| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
R-I(6A) Is a Candidate Tumor Susceptibility Allele1
Cell Biology Program [B. P., Y-G. C., R. S .L., L. K., J. M.], Department of Human Genetics [P. K., K. N., D. B., D. Y., S. J., L. L., K. O.], and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics [J. S.], Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Human Genetics Program, Department of Pediatrics, New York University Medical Center, New York, New York [C. O., H. O.]; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021 [J. M.]; Unit of Cancer Epidemiology, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche e Oncologia Umana, Università di Torino e CPO-Piemonte, 10126 Torino, Italy [P. V.]; and Experimental Oncology Laboratory, National Cancer Institute, 16132 Genova, Italy [L. V.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
receptor (T
R-I) polymorphic allele, T
R-I(6A), that has a deletion of three alanines from a nine-alanine stretch. We observed a higher than expected number of T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among tumor and nontumor DNA from patients with a diagnosis of cancer. To test the hypothesis that T
R-I(6A) homozygosity is associated with cancer, we performed a case-control study in patients with a diagnosis of cancer and matched healthy individuals with no history of cancer and who were identical in their gender and their geographical and ethnic background to determine the relative germ-line frequencies of this allele. We found nine T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 851 patients with cancer. In comparison, there were no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 735 healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). We also observed an excess of T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes in cancer cases compared to controls (14.6% versus 10.6%; P = 0.02, Fishers exact test). A subset analysis revealed that 4 of 112 patients with colorectal cancer were T
R-I(6A) homozygotes (P < 0.01). Using mink lung epithelial cell lines devoid of T
R-I, we established stably transfected T
R-I and T
R-I(6A) cell lines. We found that, compared to T
R-I, T
R-I(6A) was impaired as a mediator of TGF-
antiproliferative signals. We conclude that T
R-I(6A) acts as a tumor susceptibility allele that may contribute to the development of cancer, especially colon cancer, by means of reduced TGF-
-mediated growth inhibition. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
function. This prediction was recently fulfilled by the discovery that mice with decreased TGF-
levels have an increased susceptibility to tumor development (1)
. Inactivating mutations of the type II TGF3
-
receptor (T
R-II) have been reported in gastrointestinal cancers with microsatellite instability (2, 3, 4)
. Two repetitive dinucleotide sequences within the coding region of T
R-II are prone to replication errors that encode truncated, inactive receptors. Missense mutations elsewhere in T
R-II have been described in T-cell lymphomas and head and neck carcinomas (5
, 6)
. Homozygous deletion of T
R-I was reported in pancreatic and biliary carcinomas (7)
. Additionally, in several human cancer cell lines that lack active TGF-
receptors, restoration of functional receptors reverses the transformed phenotype of the cell lines (8
, 9)
.
Targeting of the TGF-
pathway in cancer is further demonstrated by the identification of inactivating mutations in Smad4/DPC4 and Smad2. Smad4/DPC4 was originally cloned as a tumor suppressor gene that is deleted or mutated in half of human pancreatic carcinomas (10)
. Smad4/DPC4 mutations have also been found in carcinomas of the colon, esophagus, breast, ovary, lung and head, and neck cancer (11, 12, 13)
. Missense and other mutations of Smad2 occur in colon cancer (14)
. Recent reports indicate that germ-line mutations of T
R-II (15)
and Smad4/DPC4 (16)
may predispose to the development of hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer and juvenile polyposis, respectively.
Reduced expression of T
R-I has been noted in colon and prostate cancer (17
, 18)
, and a tumor-specific mutation was recently reported in breast cancer (19)
. We have previously described a type I TGF-
receptor (T
R-I) polymorphic allele, T
R-I(6A), which has a deletion of three alanines from a nine-alanine stretch (20)
. We had observed a higher than expected frequency of T
R-I(6A) homozygotes in both tumor and nontumor DNA samples from patients with a diagnosis of cancer (20)
, suggesting that T
R-I(6A) might contribute to cancer development.
To test the hypothesis of an association of this mutant allele with neoplasms, we performed a case-control study to determine the relative frequencies of this allele in the germ-line of patients with various malignancies and controls of identical gender, geographical, and ethnic background. We found nine T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 851 patients with cancer. In comparison, there were no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 735 healthy volunteers (P < 0.01). We also observed an excess of T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes in cancer cases compared to controls (14.6% versus 10.6%; P < 0.02, Fishers exact test). A subset analysis revealed that 4 of 112 patients with colon cancer were T
R-I(6A) homozygotes (P < 0.01).
To further investigate these observations, we stably transfected mink lung epithelium cell lines devoid of functional T
R-I with T
R-I(6A) and T
R-I. TGF-
growth-inhibition experiments showed that, compared to T
R-I, T
R-I(6A) was impaired as a mediator of antiproliferative signals. We conclude that T
R-I(6A) acts as a tumor susceptibility allele that may contribute to the development of cancer, in particular, colon cancer. Up to 9% of colorectal neoplasia may be attributed to heterozygosity or homozygosity of this allele in the general population.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R-I genotype. These included 80 nontumor DNA specimens from patients with cancer reported previously (20)
and 771 specimens consecutively ascertained from patients admitted to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center. DNA was extracted from peripheral blood after the completion of diagnostic studies on these samples. Information regarding sex, age, and ethnic status (race and religion) was recorded; all other personal identifiers were permanently removed. Detailed clinical and family history information was available only from the initial 80 specimens, of which 40 were from patients with colorectal cancer (20)
. A population of 617 male and female healthy individuals with a well-defined geographic and ethnic background from the New York University Medical Center who had donated blood for various reasons (predominantly prenatal screening for noncancer hereditary disease) as well as 118 normal blood donors described previously (20)
constituted the control group. None of the controls had any history of cancer at the time of the blood donation. This was ascertained by a questionnaire filled by each control. All cases and controls resided in the New York metropolitan region, and both groups were similar with respect to the proportion of Caucasian (80%), African-American (5%), Hispanic (10%), or Asian (5%) origin. Cases and controls matched for gender and ethnic status. However, the mean age of the cases was 56 years, and the mean age of 376 of the controls on which age data were available was 35 years. Additionally, 50 controls and 347 histologically confirmed cancer cases from the Turin metropolitan area without any additional identifiers were available for screening.
Genotyping.
Genomic DNA (200 ng) were amplified as described previously (20)
. All genotypes except for T
R-I/T
R-I and T
R-I/T
R-I(6A) were confirmed by either direct sequencing or restriction enzyme digestion of the product. We used BssSI because this enzyme recognizes a unique site within the amplified fragment and yields a common 66-bp fragment and fragments of 44-, 53-, and 56-bp for T
R-I(6A), T
R-I, and T
R-I(10A), respectively.
Cells devoid of T
R-I were transfected with vectors encoding T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A). To facilitate the quantitation of the transfected receptor, the T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A) constructs encoded an influenza virus HA epitope at the COOH-terminus of the receptor. This epitope does not alter the signaling activity of T
R-I (21)
. Growth-inhibition assays were performed over a wide range of TGF-
concentrations.
Plasmid Construction.
pCMV5 vectors encoding T
R-I-HA, T
R-I(6A)-HA, or T
R-I(10A)-HA were prepared as described previously (20)
. The pUHD10-3 hygromycin vectors were generated by inserting each of the HA-tagged alleles into the linearized plasmid. The proper alignment of the construct was verified by sequencing.
Cell Lines and Stable Transfection.
To analyze the signaling activity of the various alleles, R1B/L17 cells containing the pUHD15-1 tetracycline repressor plasmid (22)
were stably transfected with the pUHD10-3 hygromycin vectors using the lipofectin procedure according to the manufacturers protocol (Life Technologies, Inc.). This cell line is derived from Mv1Lu mink lung epithelial cells by chemical mutagenesis (23)
and is defective in T
R-I and completely insensitive to TGF-
1 transcriptional and antiproliferative responses (24
, 25) . Clones were selected by ring cloning in 1 mg/ml of G-418 (Geneticin, Life Technologies, Inc., Life Technologies, Inc.), 0.3 mg/ml of hygromycin (Calbiochem), and 2 µg/ml of tetracycline. To examine the expression of the exogenous T
R-I, the clones were grown to 50% confluency. The culture medium was then switched to medium with or without 2 µg/ml of tetracycline. After 18 h, the cells were lysed in hypotonic buffer, and T
R-I expression was assessed by Western immunoblotting of whole-cell extracts (10 µg) using the 3F10 anti-HA antibody (Boehringer Mannheim). The expression of the exogenous T
R-I was not repressible in the presence of tetracycline in most of our clones.
TGF-
Growth-Inhibition Assays.
Clones with identical levels of expression in the absence of tetracycline were selected for TGF-
growth-inhibition assays. TGF-
growth inhibition was performed in medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum as described before (24)
. All experiments were performed in triplicates with four different clones from each of the T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A) cell lines.
TGF-
Receptor Affinity-Labeling and Metabolic-Labeling Assays.
TGF-
receptor affinity-labeling assays using 125I-TGF-
1 and disuccinyl suberimidate were performed as previously described (26)
. Stably transfected cell lines with a comparable high level of receptor expression were placed in methionine/cysteine-deficient medium for 1 h. Pulse-chase labeling of the cells was performed with 35S-methionine/cysteine (Amersham) for 15 min. After the removal of the pulse medium, the cells were washed extensively and chased in regular DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS for up to 8 h. At each time point, the cells were lysed in TNE buffer supplemented with protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Immunoprecipitation using the 3F10 anti-HA antibody (Boehringer Mannheim) was performed. The immunoprecipitates were subsequently washed and separated by SDS-PAGE, followed by autoradiography.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R-I(6A) Heterozygotes and Homozygotes Are Over-represented in Cancer Cases.
R-I(6A) homozygotes were observed in 9 of the 851 cases and in none of the 735 controls (P < 0.01, Fishers exact test). Of the 851 cancer cases, 124 were T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes [1 T
R-I(6A)/T
R-I(10A) and 123 T
R-I/T
R-I(6A); 14.6%] compared to 78 among 735 controls (10.6%; P = 0.02; Table 1
R-I(6A) homozygotes, compared to 735 controls in which no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were observed (P < 0.01). The over-representation of T
R-I(6A) homozygotes in colon cancer cases was confirmed in an analysis of a subset of the study population presumed to be in a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. Two T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes and two T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were observed in 25 colon cancer cases of Ashkenazi background. Based on a T
R-I(6A) heterozygote frequency of 12% observed in Ashkenazi controls, the finding of two homozygotes is highly significant (P < 0.01).
|
|
R-I(6A) allele were similar with respect to the male/female proportion and the proportion of various ethnic backgrounds. Among the subset of cases with colorectal cancer, the median age of onset of disease was 56 years in the four T
R-I(6A) homozygotes, compared to 58 years in 107 patients who were wild type for at least one allele. Of the four T
R-I(6A) homozygotes with colon cancer, all were Caucasian; two were of Ashkenazi Jewish ancestry, and two were non-Jewish. One of the T
R-I(10A) cases was an African-American female with colon cancer, and the others were a female of Ashkenazi Jewish origin who had ovarian cancer and a Caucasian non-Jewish male with germ cell cancer.
Other T
R-I Variants Observed in Cases and Controls.
Whereas two T
R-I(10A) heterozygotes and a single T
R-I(10A)/T
R-I(6A) compound heterozygote were observed in patients with germ cell cancer, ovarian cancer, and colon cancer, respectively, no T
R-I(10A) heterozygotes or compounds were observed in the 735 subjects unaffected by cancer. However, in the control group, there were two T
R-I(8A) heterozygotes and one T
R-I(5A) heterozygote characterized by a stretch of eight and five alanines, respectively. One T
R-I(8A) heterozygote was of African descent from Jamaica, the other was of Hispanic (Puerto Rican) origin. The only T
R-I(5A) heterozygote was also from Puerto Rico. Hence, individuals of varied ethnic backgrounds were found to carry a total of five T
R-I alleles: T
R-I(5A), T
R-I(6A), T
R-I(8A), T
R-I, and T
R-I(10A). Although the T
R-I(10A) allele was noted in three patients with a diagnosis of cancer, small numbers preclude epidemiological correlation. T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were also noted in single cases of lymphoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer, and two cases of germ cell cancer (Table 1)
.
Analysis of Northern Italian Samples.
A separate group of patient samples from Northern Italy was investigated. One T
R-I(6A) homozygote and one T
R-I(10A) heterozygote were observed in cancer patients but not in controls. We found 1 T
R-I(6A) homozygote among 48 cases of breast cancer. No T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were observed among 50 controls and 65 cases of colon cancer. There was one T
R-I/T
R-I(10A) but no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 234 Italian bladder cancer cases. Similarly, no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were found among 77 New York patients with a diagnosis of bladder cancer.
Functional Assessment of T
R-I(6A) in Stably Transfected Cell Lines.
There was a small but significant difference in TGF-
growth inhibition when T
R-I(6A) clones were compared with T
R-I(10A) or T
R-I clones. TGF-
growth-inhibition assays using four different sets of T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A) clones showed similar results (Fig. 2)
. Each set was chosen based on comparable levels of receptor expression as assessed by Western immunoblotting (Fig. 3)
. Both high and low expresser clones were chosen for each T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A), and the percentages of growth inhibition for a given TGF-
concentration were found to be similar among clones of a same allele, i.e., independent of the amounts of receptors expressed (data not shown). ANOVA showed that TGF-
inhibited T
R-I(6A) clones less effectively than T
R-I clones (P < 0.01) and T
R-I(10A) clones (P < 0.01).
|
|
-receptor interactions were analyzed using increasing concentrations of 125I-TGF-
1 and a cross-linking reagent to visualize 125I-TGF-
1 interactions with the transfected T
R-I and the endogenous type II receptor (T
R-II) in these cell lines. The binding affinity was assessed by adding unlabeled TGF-
1 (Fig. 3)
affinity were observed between T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A) (Fig. 3)
R-I and T
R-I(6A) proteins in the stably transfected cell line, which was assessed by performing pulse-chase metabolic labeling experiments using 35S-methionine/cysteine, showed no difference in the metabolic stability of T
R-I and T
R-I(6A). Both had a half-life of
1.5 h (data not shown), as compared with a reported half-life of 2.53 h for endogenous T
R-I from the parental Mv1Lu cell line (27)
. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
R-I(6A) homozygosity is associated with cancer. A predisposition to cancer, predominantly of the large intestine, was observed both in T
R-I(6A) homozygotes and in T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes. One possible interpretation of these findings is that these genotypes result in a decreased function of the receptor. The decrease in function might be small in T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes but may become more pronounced in T
R-I(6A) homozygotes. It is consistent with the findings that defects in the TGF-
receptor system causing a limited loss in the growth inhibitory effect of TGF-
lead to tumorigenesis (1)
. Such a functional alteration is compatible with normal development into adult age but is likely to contribute to tumorigenesis in colon epithelial cells and other tissues. The fact that this alteration was over-represented among patients with a diagnosis of colon cancer suggests that T
R-I(6A) homozygous colon epithelial cells may derive an advantage from decreased TGF-
signaling during tumor development. T
R-I(6A) functional alteration with respect to growth inhibition corroborates the recent finding that T
R-I(6A) mink lung epithelial cell lines are less effectively growth-inhibited by TGF-
when using the firefly luciferase reporter gene, pSBE428.
Although comparable with respect to gender, geographical location, and ethnic origin, cases were older than controls (mean age for cases, 56 years; mean age for controls, 35 years). It is possible that age differences in cases and controls affected the allele frequencies observed. If the T
R-I(6A) allele predisposes to a lethal malignancy such as colorectal cancer, however, its frequency could be higher, not lower, in a younger cohort. Thus, the younger mean age of controls could result in a bias toward the null hypothesis, resulting in an even stronger association than that observed.
Our findings are in agreement with a recent report investigating T
R-I(6A) frequency among 66 patients with a diagnosis of cancer of the cervix and 68 matched controls (28)
. Indeed, the authors found 10.3% T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes among controls and 15.2% among patients with a diagnosis of cancer or the cervix, which is almost identical to the 10.6% and 14.6% T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes we observed. Similarly, the only T
R-I(6A) homozygote was found in a patient with cancer of the cervix.
The presumed site of signal peptide sequence cleavage is within the T
R-I polyalanine stretch (29)
. Therefore, it is not known whether deletions and insertion within the polyalanine stretch are part of the signal peptide or part of the mature receptor. The observation that T
R-I(6A) clones were less effectively inhibited than the wild-type clones raises the possibility that T
R-I(6A) encodes a receptor that, in its mature form, lacks three alanine residues. This hypothesis is reinforced by the report that the T
R-I polyalanine tract is not necessary for membrane localization (28)
. This might affect ligand binding, and T
R-I(6A) might bind TGF-
less effectively than T
R-I. Although no differences in TGF-
affinity were observed between T
R-I, T
R-I(6A), and T
R-I(10A), and no difference in the metabolic stability of T
R-I and T
R-I(6A) was demonstrated, these results do not exclude potential small differences between T
R-I and T
R-I(6A) in their ligand binding, intracellular processing, and compartmentalization that escape detection in our assays. Further studies are mandated to determine the molecular mechanism of T
R-I(6A) in cancer development.
The finding of one T
R-I/T
R-I(10A) heterozygote but no T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 234 Italian bladder cancer cases is consistent with the absence of T
R-I(6A) homozygotes among 77 New York patients with a diagnosis of bladder cancer. These observations are in apparent contrast with our previous report that 6 of 66 bladder cancer samples were T
R-I(6A) homozygotes (20)
. Because those data were from tumor DNA and because loss of heterozygosity of chromosome 9 occurs in >50% of cases of bladder cancer (30)
, it is probable that some of those samples were in fact not true homozygotes but pseudohomozygotes in which the wild-type allele was deleted. Additional studies of tumor and nontumor DNA from patients with bladder cancer are warranted to determine whether there is a preferential loss of the T
R-I over the T
R-I(6A) arm in T
R-I/T
R-I(6A) heterozygotes with bladder cancer. T
R-I(6A) homozygotes were not observed in a small number of Northern Italian colon cancer cases. If this is replicated in a larger study, this suggests the possibility that environmental or other genetic factors may contribute to the development of colon cancer in T
R-I(6A) homozygotes.
This study reveals that a common polymorphism in the TGF-
signaling pathway results in decreased TGF-
antiproliferative effects, thus resulting in increased cancer susceptibility. Assuming a population frequency of T
R-I(6A) homozygotes as predicted by the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, colon cancer predisposition due to homozygosity at this locus may account for as much as 3% of incident cases of the disease (4500 cases/year in the United States), with an additional 6% (9000 cases/year) attributable to the increase in risk observed in individuals heterozygous for T
R-I(6A). In contrast, the highly penetrant genetic mutations associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer and adenomatous polyposis account for 34% and <1% of cases of colorectal neoplasia, respectively (31)
. These observations, as well as prior associations of germ-line mutations of T
R-II and SMAD4 with inherited colorectal neoplasia (15
, 16)
, suggest that alterations in the TGF-
signaling pathway, such as with T
R-I(6A), constitute important predisposing factors in colon cancer tumorigenesis and may account for a large proportion of inheritable cases of the disease. Although the data presented here provide strong evidence that T
R-I(6A) acts as a tumor susceptibility allele, additional studies are needed to determine the phenotype of homozygotes and the range and magnitude of cancer risks in mutation carriers.
|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grants K12 CA01712-04 (to B. P.), CA43610 (to J. M.), and CA08748 (to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center), the Lymphoma Foundation, the National Foundation for Jewish Genetic Diseases, and the Kleberg Foundation. J. M. is an investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-8636; Fax: (212) 717-3129; E-mail: offitk@mskcc.org. (K.O.) or j{at}ski.mskcc.org (J.M.). ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TGF, transforming growth factor. ![]()
Received 7/ 7/99. Accepted 9/ 7/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-1 is a new form of tumor suppressor with true haploid insufficiency. Nat. Med., 4: 802-807, 1998.[Medline]
receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability [see comments]. Science (Washington DC), 268: 1336-1338, 1995.
receptor type II gene mutation common in colon and gastric but rare in endometrial cancers with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res., 55: 5545-5547, 1995.
type II receptor gene and its mutations in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancers. Cancer Res., 56: 4595-4598, 1996.
type II receptor in human head and neck squamous carcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 55: 3982-3987, 1995.
receptor in the malignant progression of a cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 3480-3489, 1996.[Abstract]
receptor genes in pancreatic and biliary adenocarcinomas. Cancer Res., 58: 5329-5332, 1998.
receptor inactivates its tumor suppressor activity in replication error-positive colon carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 22044-22049, 1995.
type II receptor leads to reduced malignancy in human breast cancer MCF-7 cells. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 26449-26455, 1994.
type II receptor gene. Nat. Genet., 19: 17-18, 1998.[Medline]
type I receptor contributes to the malignancy of human colon carcinoma cells. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 17366-17371, 1996.
(TGF-
) receptor type I gene correlates with insensitivity to TGF-
1 in human prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res., 56: 44-48, 1996.
type I receptor kinase mutant associated with metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 4805-4810, 1998.
receptor maps to 9q22 and exhibits a polymorphism and a rare variant within a polyalanine tract. Cancer Res., 58: 2727-2732, 1998.
receptor. Nature (Lond.), 370: 341-347, 1994.[Medline]
. Genes Dev., 9: 1831-1845, 1995.
(TGF-
) restored by genetic complementation between cells defective in TGF-
receptors I and II. J. Biol. Chem., 266: 9108-9112, 1991.
signaling by a mutation that prevents transphosphorylation within the receptor complex. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 1573-1581, 1995.[Abstract]
receptors reveals a novel form of receptor cooperativity essential for signaling. EMBO J., 15: 276-289, 1996.[Medline]
transforming growth factor. Methods Enzymol., 146: 143-153: 143153, 1987.[Medline]
receptors-implications for complex formation. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 11444-11451, 1997.
receptor genes in human cervical carcinoma. Int. J. Cancer, 82: 43-51, 1999.[Medline]
type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF
type II receptor. Cell, 75: 681-692, 1993.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
Z. Lei, R.-Y. Liu, J. Zhao, Z. Liu, X. Jiang, W. You, X.-F. Chen, X. Liu, K. Zhang, B. Pasche, et al. TGFBR1 Haplotypes and Risk of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cancer Res., September 1, 2009; 69(17): 7046 - 7052. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Q. Zeng, S. Phukan, Y. Xu, M. Sadim, D. S. Rosman, M. Pennison, J. Liao, G.-Y. Yang, C.-C. Huang, L. Valle, et al. Tgfbr1 Haploinsufficiency Is a Potent Modifier of Colorectal Cancer Development Cancer Res., January 15, 2009; 69(2): 678 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Valle, T. Serena-Acedo, S. Liyanarachchi, H. Hampel, I. Comeras, Z. Li, Q. Zeng, H.-T. Zhang, M. J. Pennison, M. Sadim, et al. Germline Allele-Specific Expression of TGFBR1 Confers an Increased Risk of Colorectal Cancer Science, September 5, 2008; 321(5894): 1361 - 1365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. S. Rosman, S. Phukan, C.-C. Huang, and B. Pasche TGFBR1*6A Enhances the Migration and Invasion of MCF-7 Breast Cancer Cells through RhoA Activation Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 68(5): 1319 - 1328. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Bian, T. J. Knobloch, M. Sadim, V. Kaklamani, A. Raji, G.-Y. Yang, C. M. Weghorst, and B. Pasche Somatic acquisition of TGFBR1*6A by epithelial and stromal cells during head and neck and colon cancer development Hum. Mol. Genet., December 15, 2007; 16(24): 3128 - 3135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Skoglund, B. Song, J. Dalen, S. Dedorson, D. Edler, F. Hjern, J. Holm, C. Lenander, U. Lindforss, N. Lundqvist, et al. Lack of an Association between the TGFBR1*6A Variant and Colorectal Cancer Risk Clin. Cancer Res., June 15, 2007; 13(12): 3748 - 3752. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Daley, W. Morgan, S. Lewis, J. Willis, R. C. Elston, S. D. Markowitz, and G. L. Wiesner Is TGFBR1*6A a Susceptibility Allele for Nonsyndromic Familial Colorectal Neoplasia? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2007; 16(5): 892 - 894. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Xu and B. Pasche TGF-{beta} signaling alterations and susceptibility to colorectal cancer Hum. Mol. Genet., April 15, 2007; 16(R1): R14 - R20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Peterlongo, N. Mitra, A. S. d. Abajo, M. d. l. Hoya, C. Bassi, L. Bertario, P. Radice, E. Glogowski, K. Nafa, T. Caldes, et al. Increased frequency of disease-causing MYH mutations in colon cancer families Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2006; 27(11): 2243 - 2249. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. S. Feigelson, A. V. Patel, W. R. Diver, V. L. Stevens, M. J. Thun, and E. E. Calle Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Receptor Type I and Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Polymorphisms Are Not Associated with Postmenopausal Breast Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1236 - 1237. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-H. Mao, E. F. Saunier, J. P. de Koning, M. M. McKinnon, M. N. Higgins, K. Nicklas, H.-T. Yang, A. Balmain, and R. J. Akhurst Genetic variants of Tgfb1 act as context-dependent modifiers of mouse skin tumor susceptibility PNAS, May 23, 2006; 103(21): 8125 - 8130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. E. Kemp, L. G. Carvajal-Carmona, E. Barclay, M. Gorman, L. Martin, W. Wood, A. Rowan, C. Donohue, S. Spain, E. Jaeger, et al. Evidence of linkage to chromosome 9q22.33 in colorectal cancer kindreds from the United kingdom. Cancer Res., May 15, 2006; 66(10): 5003 - 5006. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Casey, P. J. Neville, X. Liu, S. J. Plummer, M. S. Cicek, L. M. Krumroy, A. P. Curran, M. R. McGreevy, W. J. Catalona, E. A. Klein, et al. Podocalyxin variants and risk of prostate cancer and tumor aggressiveness Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2006; 15(5): 735 - 741. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Watkins, S. E. Harris, M. J. Craven, A. L. Vincent, I. M. Winship, K. Gersak, and A. N. Shelling An investigation into FOXE1 polyalanine tract length in premature ovarian failure Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2006; 12(3): 145 - 149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chen, C. R. Jackson, A. Link, M. P. Markey, B. M. Colligan, L. E. Douglass, J. O. Pemberton, J. A. Deddens, J. R. Graff, and J. H. Carter Int7G24A Variant of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor Type I Is Associated with Invasive Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 12(2): 392 - 397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pasche, V. Kaklamani, A. Rademaker, N. Hou, H. Ahsan, and Y. Chen In Reply J. Clin. Oncol., October 20, 2005; 23(30): 7744 - 7746. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pasche, T. J. Knobloch, Y. Bian, J. Liu, S. Phukan, D. Rosman, V. Kaklamani, L. Baddi, F. S. Siddiqui, W. Frankel, et al. Somatic Acquisition and Signaling of TGFBR1*6A in Cancer JAMA, October 5, 2005; 294(13): 1634 - 1646. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Bian, T. Caldes, J. Wijnen, P. Franken, H. Vasen, V. Kaklamani, K. Nafa, P. Peterlongo, N. Ellis, J. A. Baron, et al. TGFBR1{star}6A May Contribute to Hereditary Colorectal Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2005; 23(13): 3074 - 3078. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Kaklamani, L. Baddi, J. Liu, D. Rosman, S. Phukan, C. Bradley, C. Hegarty, B. McDaniel, A. Rademaker, C. Oddoux, et al. Combined Genetic Assessment of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling Pathway Variants May Predict Breast Cancer Risk Cancer Res., April 15, 2005; 65(8): 3454 - 3461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Pasche, V. Kaklamani, N. Hou, and A. Rademaker In Reply: J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2004; 22(13): 2754 - 2755. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
J R Howe, M G Sayed, A F Ahmed, J Ringold, J Larsen-Haidle, A Merg, F A Mitros, C A Vaccaro, G M Petersen, F M Giardiello, et al. The prevalence of MADH4 and BMPR1A mutations in juvenile polyposis and absence of BMPR2, BMPR1B, and ACVR1 mutations J. Med. Genet., July 1, 2004; 41(7): 484 - 491. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. G. Kaklamani, N. Hou, Y. Bian, J. Reich, K. Offit, L. S. Michel, W.S. Rubinstein, A. Rademaker, and B. Pasche TGFBR1*6A and Cancer Risk: A Meta-Analysis of Seven Case-Control Studies J. Clin. Oncol., September 1, 2003; 21(17): 3236 - 3243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Tang, M. L. McKinnon, L. M. Leong, S. A. B. Rusholme, S. Wang, and R. J. Akhurst Genetic modifiers interact with maternal determinants in vascular development of Tgfb1-/- mice Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2003; 12(13): 1579 - 1589. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Evangelou, M. Letarte, I. Jurisica, M. Sultan, K. J. Murphy, B. Rosen, and T. J. Brown Loss of Coordinated Androgen Regulation in Nonmalignant Ovarian Epithelial Cells with BRCA1/2 Mutations and Ovarian Cancer Cells Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2416 - 2424. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. K. Law, A. Chytil, N. Dumont, E. G. Hamilton, M. E. Waltner-Law, M. E. Aakre, C. Covington, and H. L. Moses Rapamycin Potentiates Transforming Growth Factor {beta}-Induced Growth Arrest in Nontransformed, Oncogene-Transformed, and Human Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2002; 22(23): 8184 - 8198. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. de Jong, I. M. Nolte, G. J. te Meerman, W. T. A. van der Graaf, E. G. E. de Vries, R. H. Sijmons, R. M. W. Hofstra, and J. H. Kleibeuker Low-penetrance Genes and Their Involvement in Colorectal Cancer Susceptibility Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2002; 11(11): 1332 - 1352. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Lu, J. T. Murray, W. Luo, H. Li, X. Wu, H. Xu, J. M. Backer, and Y.-G. Chen Transforming Growth Factor beta Activates Smad2 in the Absence of Receptor Endocytosis J. Biol. Chem., August 9, 2002; 277(33): 29363 - 29368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M M de Jong, I M Nolte, G J te Meerman, W T A van der Graaf, J C Oosterwijk, J H Kleibeuker, M Schaapveld, and E G E de Vries Genes other than BRCA1 and BRCA2 involved in breast cancer susceptibility J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2002; 39(4): 225 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. W. Baxter, D. Y. H. Choong, D. M. Eccles, and I. G. Campbell Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Receptor 1 Polyalanine Polymorphism and Exon 5 Mutation Analysis in Breast and Ovarian Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2002; 11(2): 211 - 214. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.-M. Stefanovska, G. D. Efremov, A. J. Dimovski, D. Jasar, G. Zografski, T. Josifovski, M. Panovski, R. Jankova, M. Spiroski, B. Pasche, et al. T{beta}R-I(6A) Polymorphism Is not a Tumor Susceptibility Allele in Macedonian Colorectal Cancer Patients Correspondence re: B. Pasche et al. Type I T{beta}R-I(6A) Is a Candidate Tumor Susceptibility Allele. Cancer Res., 58: 2727-2732, 1998. Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 61(22): 8351 - 8351. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Winawer A Quarter Century of Colorectal Cancer Screening: Progress and Prospects J. Clin. Oncol., September 15, 2001; 19(90001): 6s - 12. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Cleary, E. Boulton, and M. Plumb Allelic loss on chromosome 4 (Lyr2/TLSR5) is associated with myeloid, B-lympho-myeloid, and lymphoid (B and T) mouse radiation-induced leukemias Blood, September 1, 2001; 98(5): 1549 - 1554. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A J Alvi, J S Rader, M Broggini, F Latif, and E R Maher Microsatellite instability and mutational analysis of transforming growth factor {beta} receptor type II gene (TGFBR2) in sporadic ovarian cancer Mol. Pathol., August 1, 2001; 54(4): 240 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Ziv, J. Cauley, P. A. Morin, R. Saiz, and W. S. Browner Association Between the T29->C Polymorphism in the Transforming Growth Factor {beta}1 Gene and Breast Cancer Among Elderly White Women: The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures JAMA, June 13, 2001; 285(22): 2859 - 2863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Chen, J. Triplett, B. Dehner, B. Hurst, B. Colligan, J. Pemberton, J. R. Graff, and J. H. Carter Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Receptor Type I Gene Is Frequently Mutated in Ovarian Carcinomas Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 61(12): 4679 - 4682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |