| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Mouse Radiation Chimera1
Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel [H. M., B. D., R. S., F. A., W. B., A. C.] and Hematology Institute, Kaplan Hospital, Rehovot, Israel [A. S., L. S., M. S., D. E., A. B.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
mouse radiation chimera. This effect is prominent in early-stage disease, whereas in advanced stage suppresive and/or stimulatory effects may occur in different patients. The interaction of T cells with tumor cells and the potential of autologous T cell/immune-therapy in CLL can be further explored in this model. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lubin et al. (14)
described a new approach that enables the adoptive transfer of human PBMCs into lethally irradiated normal strains of mice radioprotected with SCID BM. This model has the advantages of rapid dissemination of human cells, rapid human immunoglobulin production, and resistance to EBV-induced transformation of human lymphocytes (15)
. We have recently described a model for human B-CLL in which PBMCs of CLL patients are transplanted into the peritoneal cavity of these human
mouse radiation chimera (18)
. In this model, adoptive transfer of low-stage PBMCs leads to marked engraftment of T cells or combined T and CLL cells engraftment, whereas high-stage PBMCs lead to dominance of CLL cells with a miniscule level of T-cell engraftment. This mutually exclusive pattern of engraftment indicated that T cells might control the expansion of tumor cells in the peritoneum of recipient mice.
In the present study, we investigated the effect of manipulation of T cells on the engraftment potential of CLL cells, at different stages of the disease, by manipulating the T cell level in human
mouse chimera following adoptive transfer of PBMCs from CLL patients.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Conditioning Regimen for Mice.
BALB/c mice were exposed to split dose (4 Gy, followed 3 days later by 10 Gy) total body irradiation, from a gamma beam 150-A 60Co source (produced by the Atomic Energy of Canada, Kanata, Ontario) with focal skin distance of 75 cm and a dose rate of 0.7 Gy/min. BNX mice were exposed to total body irradiation of 12 Gy (single dose) 1 day before transplantation.
Preparation and Transplantation of BM Cells.
BM cells were obtained from NOD/SCID mice (48 weeks of age), according to Levite et al. (16)
. Recipient mice were injected with 23x106 SCID BM cells (i.v. in 0.2 ml of PBS) 1 day after irradiation.
CLL Patients.
The patient group included 22 patients treated in the Kaplan Hospital Hematology Institute (Rehovot, Israel). Diagnosis of CLL was based on sustained lymphocytosis, peripheral blood smear, BM biopsy, and expression of CD5. Some patients had morphological features consistent with activated CLL or prolymphocytoid transformation at diagnosis. Each patient donated 2075 ml of blood after giving informed consent. Blood was drawn using heparin-washed sterile syringes, and PBMCs were separated as described below within 24 h. The patients charts were reviewed for age, disease duration, CLL stage according to Rais classification (17)
, and current treatment.
Preparation and Transplantation of Human PBMCs.
Whole blood from CLL patients was layered onto Lymphoprep solution (Nycomed, Oslo, Norway) and spun at 2000 rpm for 20 min. The interlayer was collected, washed twice, counted, and resuspended in PBS (pH 7.4) to the desired cell concentration. Human PBMCs (120 x 106 cells in 0.51.0 ml of PBS) were injected i.p. into recipient mice, conditioned as described above.
Depletion of T Cells from PBMCs.
In most of the experiments, T-cell depletion was performed in vivo by the i.p. injection of 200 µl of mouse antihuman CD3 (OKT3) ascities (ATCC CRL 8002) on the day of transplantation. In three experiments, using PBMCs of three different patients, PBMCs were depleted of T cells ex vivo by SRBC rossetting as described below. Cells from the T cell-enriched cell fraction were than added to unseparated PBMCs, so as to enrich the CLL cells with T cells. In each of these experiments, there were three groups of mice receiving either unseparated, T cell-depleted, or T cell-enriched PBMCs, including the same dose of CLL cells. The latter group received two to three times more T cells compared with the group receiving unseparated cells, whereas in the group receiving T cell-depleted PBMCs only a very low T cell dose was infused.
Preparation of SRBC or Rosetting.
AET solution was prepared by dissolving 2 g of 2-aminoethylisothiouronium bromide hydrobromide (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in 50 ml of sterile preservative-free H2O. The pH was adjusted to 8.35 with 10 N NaOH, and the solution was filtered through a 0.2-µ filter. SRBCs were centrifuged for 5 min at 2500 rpm. Supernatant and buffy coat were removed, and the cells were washed four times with PBS. Sterile AET solution (20 ml) was added to 5 ml of packed, washed SRBCs in 50-ml polypropylene conical tubes, and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. At the end of the incubation period, 25 ml of cold PBS were added and the tubes were centrifuged at 2500 rpm for 5 min. The cell pellets were resuspended and washed five times with PBS until hemolysis stopped. The cells were washed again with M199 and stored at 4°C until use. Before using, the cells were irradiated (2 Gy) and washed three times with cold M199.
Rosetting of T Cells with AET-treated SRBCs.
Ficoll separated mononuclear cells (20 x 106 cells/ml, 20 ml) in M199 were mixed with 5 ml of AET-treated SRBCs (4 x 109 cells/ml) in M199. The rosetting mixture (25 ml) was layered on top of 20 ml of Ficoll and centrifuged at 1500 rpm for 30 min. After spinning, the B cell-enriched interface was collected and washed twice with PBS. The SRBCs in the pellet were lysed with ammonium chloride lysis buffer (0.155 M ammonium chloride, 0.01 N potassium bicarbonate, and 0.1 mM EDTA), and the cells were washed twice with PBS. Samples from the pellet and the interface were counted and analyzed on a FACS for the presence of T cells and B-CLL cells.
Collection of Cells from Human
Mouse Chimera.
Peritoneal cells were obtained by lavage with 10 ml of PBS. Animals were sacrificed by cervical dislocation and the peritoneum was washed again. The cells were then isolated using Lymphoprep and counted.
FACS Analysis of Donors PBMC and Human Cell Engraftment in Chimeric Mice.
Single cell suspensions were incubated for 30 min on ice with a mixture of appropriate fluorescently labeled monoclonal antibodies. After washing, two- or three-color flow cytometry analysis of human antigens was performed on a FACScan analyzer (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA). The labeled antibodies used recognize specific surface molecules: CD45-peridinin chlorophyll protein (pan leukocyte antigen); CD3-peridinin chlorophyll protein (pan T cells); CD20-FITC (pan B-cells); CD5-phycoerythrin (pan T-cells and B-1 B-cells); CD4-phycoerythrin (T helper cells); CD8-FITC (T cytotoxic cells); All of the above antibodies were purchased from Becton Dickinson. CD3 (CY-chrome) antibody was purchased from PharMingen (San Diego, CA).
Statistical Analyses.
Statistical analyses were performed using the Stat View II program (Abacus Concepts, Inc., Berkeley, CA) on a Macintosh IICi. Students t test, ANOVA correlation, and regression analyses were used to calculate probability (P) values. Results are presented as mean ± SE.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
Mouse Chimera.
|
|
|
Effect of T-Cell Depletion on Tumor Engraftment in Advanced-Stage Disease.
The effect of T-cell depletion on the engraftment of CLL cells from patients in advanced stage was evaluated in nine cases. As in the early-stage disease, T-cell depletion was efficient and only 0.4 ± 0.3% or a total of 1.1 ± 0.8 x 104 T cells were recovered from the OKT3-treated mice versus 5.6 ± 2.0% (P = 0.01) and 6.3 ± 2.6 x 104 (P = 0.04) T cells in the untreated group, respectively. The average total CLL cell engraftment was 164.5 ± 72.6 x 104 in the treated group versus 103.8 ± 43.8 in the untreated group (Table 2)
. This higher value did not reach statistical significance. The lack of effect was due to the heterogeneous effect of T-cell depletion. In five of nine cases, the CLL enhancement ratio, as defined above, was 4.2:8.6, suggesting that T-cell depletion had the same effect as in early stage. In one experiment, using donor PBMCs from patient number 18, the recovery of CLL cells from control mice transplanted with unmanipulated PBMCs was 27.7 ± 6.2 x 104, and T-cell recovery was only 1.0 ± 0.1 x 104. Treatment with OKT3 led to marked enhancement of CLL tumor cell recovery that was elevated to 117.2 ± 14.9 x 104. As expected, no T cells were recovered (Table 2
, Fig. 3
). In two patients there was no effect (ratio, 0.9), whereas, interestingly in two groups of mice transplanted with PBMCs of two different patients, T-cell depletion completely abolished CLL engraftment. In mice transplanted with PBMCs from patient number 21, CLL recovery was 32.7 ± 14.3 x 104 cells and T cell recovery was only 2.2 ± 1.8 x 104. No CLL cells were recovered from the group of mice that was transplanted with PBMCs from the same donor but was treated with OKT3. Altogether, the enhancement of CLL engraftment of early-stage donors on T-cell depletion led to a level of CLL cell recovery that was not statistically different from that found after transplantation of advanced-stage CLL in the absence of T-cell depletion.
Effect of T-Cell Enrichment in Advanced-Stage B-CLL.
Considering that in advanced-stage B-CLL the number of T cells in the initial inoculum is relatively small, it could be reasonable to speculate that this low T-cell level might be responsible for the marked expansion of CLL cells in the chimeric mice after transplantation of advanced-stage B-CLL. To test this possibility, T cells were purified by E-rossetting with SRBCs and were then added to the tumor cell fraction at different ratios (so as to enrich T-cell concentration to two to three times the original T-cell percentage), and the effect of T cell enrichment on the engraftment of the tumor cells was evaluated. As can be seen in Table 3
, the average percentage of T cells following T-cell enrichment was 13.8 ± 4.3%, and a total of 6.3 x 104 T cells were recovered from the treated group versus 2.6 ± 1.2% (P = 0.02) and 2.0 ± 0.8 x 104 (P = 0.04), respectively, in the untreated group. CLL cell recovery was 12.4 ± 4.1 x 104 in the T-enriched group versus 28.6 ± 5.6 x 104 in the untreated group (P = 0.02). A typical experiment using PBMCs from patient number 18 is presented in Fig. 3
. CLL recovery from the untreated, T-depleted, and T-enriched groups was 27.7 ± 6.2, 117.2 ± 14.9, and 13.2 ± 6.1, respectively.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To test this hypothesis, we have now compared the effect of T-cell depletion or enrichment on the ability of CLL cells to engraft and expand. By measuring both the percentage and absolute count of CLL cells and T cells in the peritoneum lavage, we have made the following observations. First, T-cell depletion in vivo by OKT3 treatment markedly enhanced the expansion of tumor cells after adoptive transfer of B-CLL cells from early-stage patients, such that CLL cell recovery was similar to that found after infusion of cells from advanced-stage patients. Interestingly, in some of the patients with almost no CLL cell engraftment, T-cell depletion restored the ability of the tumor to engraft (as in patient 1, Fig. 2
). Second, the results of T-cell depletion in mice transplanted with advanced-stage disease were more heterogeneous. Although in five of nine patients T depletion had the same stimulatory effect on CLL cell engraftment as in early-stage disease, in four cases this effect was not demonstrated. In two patients CLL cells could not engraft in the absence of T cells or were dependent on T cells for their survival in the recipient mice. Therefore, it seems that whereas in some advanced patients T cells are capable of mediating tumor supression, in others the CLL cells exhibit an opposite effect being dependent on T cells for their growth or expansion. Finally, T-cell enrichment before adoptive transfer of CLL cells from advanced-stage patients can lead to a significant reduction of CLL cell engraftment (Table 3)
.
Altogether, our results strongly suggest that T cells of B-CLL, in particular of patients in early stage, are capable of supressing growth and expansion of tumor cells. This suggestion is in accordance with several previous studies. A few reports found oligoclonal expansions within the T-cell repertoire of CLL patients, both CD4 and CD8 (19, 20, 21, 22) and some of such clones were found to recognize autologous CLL cells in a cytokine release assay (21) . In one case, Sherman et al. (23) demonstrated that T cells reacted to a tumor-specific antigen present on CLL cells in a MHC class II-restricted manner. This suggests that a tumor-specific peptide on the cell might be recognized by autologous T cells and could be a target for immunotherapy. However, additional studies with eluted peptides are required before the presence of a tumor-specific antigen can be established.
Whereas the tumor suppressive effect of T cells is regularly found in mice transplanted with CLL cells of early-stage patients and with most donors at advanced stage, it seems that in some patients, with advanced disease, T-cell depletion may lead to ablation of tumor engraftment, indicating T-cell dependency of the CLL cells. This finding is also in accordance with some in vitro studies showing that CLL cells in progressive disease, but not in early disease, are dependent on T-cell factors for their growth (6, 7, 8) . They can respond to signaling through T-cell factors (7) and lose their clonogenic potential in the absence of activated T cells (6) .
It, therefore, seems that B-CLL cells may be regulated by the normal T-cell compartment, both negatively by suppressor activity (more prominent on early stage) and positively by helper function (more prominent in advanced stage). Considering this dichotomy, it should be noted that Fludarabine, which is increasingly being used in the treatment of CLL (3) , is known to cause severe depletion of T cells, with heterogenous results as might be expected from the dual role of T cells in this disease. Thus, our model could be used to predict the response of patients to Fludarabine and thereby avoid its use in patients in whom it may lead to adverse effect. A second issue raised by our present study is related to the T-cell dysfunction that might be associated with disease progression. B-CLL is characterized by impaired humural and cellular immunity, hypogammaglobulinemia, and autoimmunity (1 , 2) . Early studies have stressed the dysfunction of T cells in this disease. The total number of T cells is usually increased, there is a reversal of the normal CD4:CD8 ratio, decreased T-cell help, and increased T suppression (24, 25, 26, 27) T cells have been found to have a decreased proliferative response to mitogens and in allogeneic and autologous mixed lymphocyte responses (30, 31, 32, 33) . Decreased cytotoxicity and natural killer activity (28 , 29) have also been reported. Different patterns may be observed in typical and atypical CLL cases (30) .
Recent studies emphasize that CLL-derived T cells are intrinsically intact, but their interaction with B-CLL cells causes their dysfunction. B-CLL cells, as normal B cells, express the HLA class II molecule and can serve as unprofessional antigen-presenting cells (31) . Decker et al. (32) found no difference in cytokine production and proliferative response of purified CLL-derived T cells; however, when autologous accessory cells were added, there was a dramatic change. Also, further indication that there is probably no intrinsic T-cell defect was suggested by the demonstration in our model that hypogammaglobulinemia is reversed on adoptive transfer of cells from donors with low-stage disease (18) . Our interpretation of these earlier results was that helper T cells, which are anargized in the tumor-bearing patient, can be released of their anargic status by the marked xenoactivation and the subsequent exposure to high levels of interleukin-2 and cytokines experienced in the mouse environment immediately after transfer of human PBMCs.
A major question in this context is how tumor cells escape recognition or anargize specific T cells. In general, the interaction between T cells and B cells is mediated by several costimulatory molecules (33)
. The most important in this regard is the CD40/CD40 ligand system. Cantwell et al. (34)
described an acquired CD40 ligand deficiency in CLL-derived T cells. They suggested that CLL cells, by the expression of CD40, down-regulate CD40L on activated T cells and by that impair the immune response. Interestingly, no CD40L could be detected when T cells were <3% of the cells in the culture. By changing the T cell:CLL cell ratio, some of the immune potential can be recovered. This is somewhat similar to the containment of advanced CLL cells in our model by increasing the percentage of T cells in the transplant inoculum. Immune surveilance of tumor cells can also be avoided by manipulation of the B7/CD28 system (41, 42). CLL cells can escape immunity as a result of the low expression of B7. In addition, T cells in CLL patients were found to have defective CD28 expression (35)
. However, exposure of CLL cells to activated T cells might lead to B7 expression. This would lead to improved recognition of these cells by T cells. In our model, a high proportion of T cells are activated due to the murine xeno-environment, and this might be one of the ways T cells improve their ability to recognize and control CLL tumor cells. However, we were unable to demonstrate CD80/86 expression on CLL cells recovered early after transplantation (data not shown). Finally, our most recent results suggest that the FasR/FasL system might explain, in part, how CLL cells escape the effect of T cells (44). Experiments that will compare T cell and CLL cell immunophenotypes, and especially activation markers, in donor cells and in cells recovered from human
mouse chimera will help to further clarify this issue.
Our demonstration that autologous T cells can control CLL cell engraftment and the demonstration that early-stage disease following T-cell depletion was very similar to that of untreated cells from patients with advanced disease, may be relevant to the pathogenesis of disease progression. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that changes in T-cell function, in addition to changes in tumor characteristics, are associated with progression of the disease from an early to an advanced stage. Consequently, it is possible that T cell harvest (perhaps of certain subsets) during early-stage disease with later reinfusion, may afford a beneficial mode of cell therapy in advanced B-CLL patients, in addition to other treatment modalities. In summary, the unique in vivo mouse model described in the present study provides a useful tool for the investigation of the pathogenesis and progression of B-CLL, as well as for the development of T-cell therapy in this disease.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by grants from XTL Biopharmaceuticals Ltd. (Rehovot, Israel). Y. R. is the incumbent of the Henry Drake Professorial Chair at the Weizmann Institute of Science. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Immunology, The Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel. Phone: 972-8-9344023; Fax: 972-8-9344145. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: B-CLL, B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cell; SCID, severe combined immune deficient; AET, 2-aminoethylisothiouronium bromide hydrobromide; SRBC, sheep RBC; BM, bone marrow; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell-sorter. ![]()
Received 6/30/99. Accepted 10/ 4/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2-microglobulin in patients with B-CLL and benign B lymphocytosis. Leuk. Res., 16: 607-613, 1992.[Medline]
mouse radiation chimera do not develop Epstein-Barr virus lymphoma. Immunol. Lett., 49: 155-161, 1996.[Medline]
) and deficient helper (T µ) activity with respect to B-cell proliferation. Blood, 57: 418-420, 1981.
chain and CD28 are poorly expressed on T lymphocytes from chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leukemia (Baltimore), 10: 494-497, 1996.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Durig, P. Ebeling, F. Grabellus, U. R. Sorg, M. Mollmann, P. Schutt, J. Gothert, L. Sellmann, S. Seeber, M. Flasshove, et al. A Novel Nonobese Diabetic/Severe Combined Immunodeficient Xenograft Model for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Reflects Important Clinical Characteristics of the Disease Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8653 - 8661. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. J. Johnson, D. M. Lucas, N. Muthusamy, L. L. Smith, R. B. Edwards, M. D. De Lay, C. M. Croce, M. R. Grever, and J. C. Byrd Characterization of the TCL-1 transgenic mouse as a preclinical drug development tool for human chronic lymphocytic leukemia Blood, August 15, 2006; 108(4): 1334 - 1338. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Arditti, S. Aviner, B. Dekel, R. Krauthgamer, J. Gan, A. Nagler, A. Tabilio, M. Martelli, A. Berrebi, and Y. Reisner Eradication of B-CLL by autologous and allogeneic host nonreactive anti-third-party CTLs Blood, April 15, 2005; 105(8): 3365 - 3371. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. D. Arditti, A. Rabinkov, T. Miron, Y. Reisner, A. Berrebi, M. Wilchek, and D. Mirelman Apoptotic killing of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia tumor cells by allicin generated in situ using a rituximab-alliinase conjugate Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2005; 4(2): 325 - 332. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Rimsza, R. A. Roberts, T. P. Miller, J. M. Unger, M. LeBlanc, R. M. Braziel, D. D. Weisenberger, W. C. Chan, H. K. Muller-Hermelink, E. S. Jaffe, et al. Loss of MHC class II gene and protein expression in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma is related to decreased tumor immunosurveillance and poor patient survival regardless of other prognostic factors: a follow-up study from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Molecular Profiling Project Blood, June 1, 2004; 103(11): 4251 - 4258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |