| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Ex3 and Survivin-2B: Two Novel Splice Variants of the Apoptosis Inhibitor Survivin with Different Antiapoptotic Properties1
Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 Top ABSTRACT IntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
Ex3) or retaining a part of intron 2 as a cryptic exon (survivin-2B). Both sequence alterations cause marked changes in the structure of the corresponding proteins, including structural modifications of the baculovirus inhibitor of apoptosis protein repeat domain. The role of the novel isoforms in the regulation of apoptosis was assessed in transfection experiments, showing conservation of antiapoptotic properties for survivin-Ex3 and a markedly reduced antiapoptotic potential for survivin-2B. In conclusion, our observations suggest a complex regulatory balance between the different isoforms of survivin, which might determine the response to proapoptotic stimuli, not only in human RCCs but also in fetal tissues and other types of cancer. |
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
The molecular pathways leading to apoptotic cell death are highly conserved evolutionarily and controlled by proteins that either promote or counteract apoptotic cell death. Regulators of apoptotic cell death identified thus far predominantly include proteins of the Bcl-2 family and the IAP3 family. First described as baculoviral genes, several cellular homologues of IAPs have been identified in eukaryotes, all of which are characterized by two or three BIRs, a COOH-terminal RING finger domain, and a caspase recruitment domain (2) . All mammalian IAPs suppress apoptosis, but their way of function is not yet fully understood and could be different from each other. Some were reported to directly bind and inhibit intracellular cysteine proteases (caspases) activated in apoptosis or, in the case of c-IAP1 and c-IAP2, to bind TRAF1 and TRAF2 (3) .
Recently, the gene for a novel member of the IAP family, survivin, was found by hybridization screening of a human P1 genomic library with the cDNA of EPR-1 (4) . Survivin is structurally unique among mammalian IAPs, containing only a single BIR and lacking the COOH-terminal RING finger domain. Additionally, in contrast to c-IAP1 and c-IAP2, survivin has no caspase recruitment domain, which is necessary for the interaction with TRAFs.
It was shown that survivin inhibits processing of procaspase-3 and procaspase-7 and specifically binds both active caspases in vitro (5) . Remarkably, caspase-3 has a key role in promoting the apoptosis signal. Thus, caspase-3 is responsible for the cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, PAK2, lamin, gelsolin, and fodrin, resulting in inhibition of DNA repair, formation of apoptotic bodies, nuclear membrane breakdown, and cytoplasmic shrinkage, all of which are hallmarks of apoptosis (6) .
Initial studies using Northern blotting, in situ hybridization, and immunohistochemistry revealed strong survivin expression in several fetal tissues, whereas no survivin transcripts were detected in a variety of adult tissues (7) . Most strikingly, survivin was observed to be expressed in the most common human cancers, including carcinomas of lung, stomach, colon, breast, and prostate as well as high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (4) . These findings suggested that cancer cells return to a fetal pattern of survivin expression to enhance cell viability and thereby possibly also become able to overcome the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents. In fact, immunohistochemical studies in neuroblastomas and colorectal carcinomas indicated a correlation between the expression of survivin and a clinically unfavorable course of disease, proposing survivin expression as a potential prognostic factor (8 , 9) .
To analyze the expression of survivin in cell lines derived from human RCC of all major histological types, we used a survivin-specific RT-PCR procedure, allowing the exclusive amplification of the entire survivin coding sequence. In this report, we describe the identification of two novel alternatively processed survivin transcripts, designated as survivin-Ex3 (lacking exon 3) and survivin-2B (retaining a part of intron 2 as a cryptic exon). The expression of both survivin and survivin-Ex3 was observed in all RCC cell lines tested, with most RCCs additionally expressing survivin-2B. The function of the novel survivin isoforms was assessed in transfection experiments, showing a largely preserved antiapoptotic function for survivin-Ex3 and a marked reduction of antiapoptotic potential for survivin-2B. Our data, therefore, suggest that survivin variants generated by alternative splicing in human RCCs are intrinsically involved in the complex regulation of apoptosis.
|
Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNA was extracted from cell lines by guanidinium thiocyanate treatment and centrifugation in 5.7 mol/l cesium chloride solution. Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from total RNA via the Oligotex kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Northern blotting and hybridization were performed as described previously (11)
.
cDNA Synthesis.
RT reactions contained 2 µg of total RNA, 1x RT buffer (Promega, Heidelberg, Germany), 25 µM of each deoxynucleotide triphosphate, 10 pmol of sequence-specific RT primer (5'-AGG AAC CTG CAG CTC AGA-3', corresponding to nucleotides 914–931 of the survivin antisense strand) or 0.06 µg of random primer (Stratagene, Heidelberg, Germany), 20 units of RNAsin RNase inhibitor (Promega), and 5 units of AMV reverse transcriptase (Promega) in a final volume of 30 µl. The specific RT reactions were incubated at 50°C and random RT reactions at 37°C for 1 h, respectively.
PCR Assays.
PCR amplifications were performed on a PTC-100 Programmable Thermal Controller (Biozym Diagnostic, Hess, Oldendorf, Germany). Three µl of cDNA mixture were subjected to amplification in a 50-µl mixture containing 2.5 units of Taq polymerase, 1x PCR buffer (both from Qiagen), 25 µM each of dATP, dCTP, dGTP, and dTTP, and 25 pmol each of 5' and 3' primer. PCR conditions were: initial denaturation for 2 min at 94°C, followed by 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing for 1 min at 62°C, extension at 72°C for 1 min, and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The primer pair used for amplification of the survivin entire coding region was: forward primer, 5'-GCA TGG GTG CCC CGA CGT TG-3' [corresponding to position 48–67 of the survivin mRNA (GenBank accession NM 001168)]; and reverse primer, 5'-GCT CCG GCC AGA GGC CTC AA-3' (position 475–494). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase controls were performed using forward primer 5'-ACG GAT TTG GTC GTA TTG GGC G-3' and reverse primer 5'-CTC CTG GAA GAT GGT GAT GG-3'.
Sequence Analysis.
Bands of interest were eluted from agarose gels using the QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen), ligated into the pGEM-T-cloning vector (Promega), and cloned in accordance to standard protocols. Plasmid DNA was recovered using the Plasmid Mini kit (Qiagen), cycle sequenced, and analyzed in a ABI Prism 310 sequencing apparatus (Applied Biosystems, Weiterstadt, Germany) using T7 or SP6 site-specific primers.
S1 Nuclease Analysis.
S1 nuclease analysis was performed using the S1 nuclease assay kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The sequences of oligonucleotide probes corresponded to exon/exon borders of the complementary strand [survivin-Ex3: position 231–270/389–428; survivin-2B: position 3244–3283/4460–4499 (according GenBank accession no. U75285)]. Probes were labeled with [
-32P]dATP by T4-polynucleotide kinase (Life Technologies) and purified according to standard protocols (1)
. Samples were analyzed on 8% denaturing polyacrylamide gels (Sequi-Gen GT Sequencing Cell; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Munich, Germany), and dried gels were submitted to autoradiography.
Cloning of survivin Coding Sequences.
To generate EGFP-tagged survivin constructs, the coding sequences of the three survivin variants were PCR amplified as described above using the following primer sets: 5'-GTC GTC GGT ACC ATG GGT GCC CCG ACG TTG-3' (sense); 5'-CAG CAG GGA TCC ATC CAT GGC AGC CAG CTG CTC-3' (antisense) for survivin and survivin-2B, respectively; and 5'-CAG CAG GGA TCC AGA CAT TGC TAA GGG GCC CAC A-3' (antisense) for survivin-Ex3. PCR reactions were purified using Microspin S-300 columns (Pharmacia Biotech Europe, Freiburg, Germany), digested with KpnI and BamHI, ligated into the mammalian expression vector pEGFP-N3 (Clontech, Heidelberg, Germany), and cloned according to standard protocols.
Transfection of Cultured Cells, Induction of Cell Death, and Assessment of Cell Viability.
Eight µg of pEGFP-N3 vector control and survivin constructs were each cotransfected with 2 µg of pCMV
into HepG2 hepatoma cells according to the DEAE-dextran protocol. After culturing for 24 h, 1 x 105 cells were plated into 24-well plates and incubated with 100 µg/ml of the potent chemotherapeutic drug methotrexate. HepG2 cells had been shown previously to be methotrexate responsive, exhibiting CD95-mediated apoptosis upon exposure to this anticancer drug (12)
. Cell viability was measured after 24-h incubation by scoring cells as alive or dead by trypan blue staining. Transfection experiments were performed at least three times.
To determine transfection efficiency, control cells were fixed 48 h after transfection (2% formaldehyde/0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS) and stained for -galactosidase expression (0.1% 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl -D-galactoside/5 mM potassium ferricyanide)/5 mM potassium ferrocyanide/2 mM MgCl2.
Immunoblotting.
Protein-normalized aliquots of SDS extracts of HepG2 transfectants were electrophoresed on 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to Optitran BA-S85 nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Dassel, Germany). The membrane was blocked over night in washing buffer [100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.2% Tween 20] plus 3% nonfat dry milk/1% BSA, incubated for 1 h at room temperature with 1 µg/ml rabbit antihuman survivin antibody (kindly provided by Dr. Dario Altieri, Boyer Center for Molecular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT) or mouse anti-GFP (Clontech), washed, and incubated with a 1: 2000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-linked donkey antirabbit or sheep anti-mouse antibody (Amersham Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) for 1 h at room temperature. After washing, binding of the primary antibody was revealed by incubation with Lumi-Light substrate (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Equal loading was confirmed by 
-tubulin detection with an anti--tubulin antibody (Sigma-Aldrich, Deisenhofen, Germany).
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
. This observation was further confirmed by RT-PCR, demonstrating the expected survivin amplification product of 431 bp, and to our surprise, two other bands of 500 and 329 bp, respectively (Fig. 1b)
. These three survivin-specific amplification products were cloned and sequenced. The largest band was identified as a survivin transcript retaining a 69-bp long part of intron 2 (corresponding to nucleotides 4460–4528 of the published sequence of the survivin gene; GenBank accession no. U75285) as a novel exon, termed exon 2B (Fig. 1c)
. The 431-bp product was identified as regularly spliced survivin. The smallest band was a survivin fragment of only 329 bp in length with the 118-bp of exon 3 missing. In addition, formation of heteroduplices occurred but did not influence the ratio between the bands of expected length. Additional amplification of genomic DNA showed no product, confirming the presence of each splice variant on mRNA level only. Short-term cultures of nonneoplastic kidney tubule epithelia showed no expression of any survivin isoform by RT-PCR (data not shown). The existence of the newly identified survivin splice variant survivin-Ex3 was further proved by distinctive S1 nuclease analysis, demonstrating the presence of the mRNAs for both regular survivin and alternatively spliced survivin-Ex3 transcripts (Fig. 1d)
.
|
. These sites matched to the consensus sequences of common SD sites ({C/A}AG|GT{A/G}AGT) and SA sites ({T/C}11N{C/T}AG|G) (13
, 14)
. Thus, it is a well-known fact that the GT bases of SD sites and the AG bases of SA sites are necessary to perform splicing processes on exon-intron and intron-exon boundaries.
|
seems to be sufficient in some RCC cell lines only to permit alternative exon usage, whereas other RCC cell lines were unable to perform insertion of exon 2B. This observation could indicate patient and/or tumor specificity of the corresponding splicing factors.
The 3' boundary of exon 2B has a SD at position 4526–4534 (GAGGTCAGG). This SD site (Fig. 2b)
matches sufficiently to the consensus site and is capable of linking exon 2B to the SA site of exon 3. No splice products, however, were found directly linking exon 2B to exon 4.
In contrast, the SD site of exon 2 is suitable for linking exon 2 directly to three different exons of the survivin gene, i.e., exon 2B (survivin-2B), exon 3 (survivin), and exon 4 (survivin-Ex3) in human RCC lines (Fig. 1c)
. In conclusion, our data convincingly indicated that the newly identified survivin variants are transcript isoforms generated by alternative splicing of the survivin pre-mRNA.
Differential Alterations of Protein Domains in the Novel survivin Splice Variants.
Computational domain analysis of the putative proteins of survivin-2B and survivin-Ex3 revealed crucial consequences of the alternative splicing processes (Fig. 3)
. The chief characteristic of survivin-2B was the modification of the essential BIR domain, which was interrupted by insertion of exon 2B. The inclusion of exon 2B generated a novel potential N-glycosylation site at position 84 and two novel potential N-myristoylation sites (positions 89 and 92). Inclusion of exon 2B, however, did not result in a frame shift, as became evident in survivin-Ex3.
|
Ex3 resulted in a modification of the BIR domain at the same position as in survivin-2B but was followed by an additional frame shift in exon 4. In consequence, the open reading frame of survivin-Ex3 ends in the 3' untranslated region of survivin at position 581 and generates a novel 63 amino acids-long COOH-terminal tail in survivin-Ex3 coded by 87 nucleotides of exon 4 and 103 nucleotides of the original 3' untranslated region. Because of this frame shift, a novel potential N-myristoylation domain was generated at position 121. In summary, both splice variants exhibited truncation of the functionally important BIR domain at the same position but differed in their COOH-terminal regions. Additional posttranslational modifications, e.g., by N-glycosylation and/or N-myristoylation, could determine differential activity and/or intracellular location of the corresponding proteins.
Differential Antiapoptotic Activity of the Novel survivin Splice Variants.
Because RCCs are known to be largely resistant to anticancer drug-induced apoptosis, we used another apoptosis-inducible tumor model for further functional analysis of the different survivin splice variants. Therefore, we selected the HepG2 tumor cell line, because this cell line had been shown previously to respond to methotrexate with marked CD95-mediated apoptosis (12)
.
Using HepG2 cells, transfection experiments revealed marked differences in the antiapoptotic activity of the novel survivin splice variants (Fig. 4)
. In accordance with its previously described antiapoptotic potential, transient transfection of HepG2 cells with survivin resulted in a marked increase of cell survival after exposure to methotrexate when compared with the empty vector control. Closely corresponding cell survival was observed after methotrexate treatment of HepG2 cells transfected with survivin-Ex3. In contrast, HepG2 cells transfected with survivin-2B showed a marked reduction of cell survival after exposure to methotrexate (Fig. 4)
.
|
Ex3) or a marked reduction (survivin-2B) of the antiapoptotic effects known from the "regularly" spliced survivin isoform. |
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
Ex3) or markedly reduced (survivin-2B) antiapoptotic properties in transfection experiments. These previously unknown splice variants could not be detected by Northern blot hybridization, because only 118-bp (survivin-Ex3) or 69-bp (survivin-2B) differences in length were found when compared with the primarily identified survivin transcript. Recently, survivin has attracted considerable attention as a novel member of the IAP family. At variance with the ubiquitous distribution of other IAPs in fetal and adult tissues, survivin expression was shown to be developmentally regulated, with intensive expression in fetal tissues and complete down-regulation in most adult tissues (7) . Most strikingly, however, reexpression of survivin was found in the most common human cancers, including carcinomas of the lung, stomach, colon, breast, prostate, and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (4) . Reexpression of survivin in cancer might provide important selective advantages by abnormally prolonging cell survival and promoting resistance to apoptosis induced by immunocompetent cells or anticancer drugs.
The biochemical mechanisms by which survivin suppresses apoptosis are still under investigation. In vitro experiments have shown that survivin binds and inhibits the cell death effector proteases caspase-3 and caspase-7 (5) , which induce a wide range of cellular degradation processes determining the morphological phenotype of apoptosis. Moreover, survivin has been demonstrated to associate specifically with microtubules of the mitotic spindle (15) . Because caspase-3 is involved in proteolysis of mitotic spindle proteins (16) , survivin might assist to preserve the integrity of the mitotic apparatus, thereby cooperating with other components of the G2-M checkpoint. Overexpression of survivin in cancer might negatively interfere with the G2-M checkpoint and promote the progression of neoplastic cells through mitosis (15) .
Although at least some of its antiapoptotic modes of action are common to other IAP family members, survivin additionally exhibits structurally unique features that also have important functional implications. Thus, survivin lacks a COOH-terminal RING finger, which appears to be critical for the antiapoptotic function of baculoviral and some cellular IAPs (2)
. Moreover, survivin contains a single BIR domain only, in contrast to other human IAP family members identified thus far (2)
. In this context, it was striking to note that the novel splice variants survivin-Ex3 and survivin-2B exhibited pronounced structural alterations of the single BIR domain. Deletion of exon 3 in survivin-Ex3 results in a frame shift with truncation of the BIR domain in addition to a new COOH-terminal protein segment, which in turn might affect functional properties such as subcellular localization (compare Fig. 3
). Despite these structural modifications, survivin-Ex3 exhibited antiapoptotic properties similar to those of survivin in our experimental system. However, survivin-Ex3-mediated antiapoptosis in HepG2 cells might be a cell type-specific phenomenon. Nevertheless, the BIR domain alone was observed to be sufficient for inhibition of apoptosis in many other systems using the cellular IAPs (2)
. Therefore, we cannot conclusively explain, thus far, why survivin-Ex3 still exerted antiapoptotic effects with a single truncated BIR domain. This observation, however, might be related either to preserved antiapoptotic potential of the BIR residues or to as yet unknown antiapoptotic properties in other regions of the survivin-Ex3 molecule.
In contrast, the acquisition of an additional "cryptic" exon in survivin-2B resulted in a modification of the BIR domain (compare Fig. 3
), which proved to be functionally relevant in transfection experiments. Thus, the potential of survivin-2B to inhibit methotrexate-induced apoptosis in HepG2 cells was markedly reduced, possibly because of a dominant-negative mechanism of competitive binding to the interaction partners of survivin.
Although further experimental work will have to elucidate the functional properties of the different survivin splice variants in more detail, our observations indicated for the first time that alternative splicing might be relevant for the fine tuning of survivin actions and possibly for the actions of other IAPs as well. Alternative splicing has been found previously to play a key role in the regulation of apoptosis, determining the actions of many apoptosis-related genes along all levels of the apoptotic pathway (reviewed in Ref. 17 ). Thus, members of the CD95 death receptor family exist in membrane-bound and soluble isoforms, which antagonistically affect apoptosis. The Bcl-2-family encompasses genes, e.g., bcl-x, the different splice variants of which can antagonistically determine the susceptibility for cell death signals (18) . Finally, different isoforms of caspases, the executive proteins of apoptosis, are generated by alternative splicing (19) .
Although alternative splicing of survivin considerably adds to the complexity of the systems controlling apoptosis, there might be an additional level of regulation. Thus, the survivin gene had been identified by hybridization with the cDNA encoding the EPR-1, and the coding sequence of survivin was found to be largely complementary to that of EPR-1. This observation suggested the possibility of apoptosis regulation by naturally occurring antisense interactions between survivin and EPR-1 transcripts (20) . Although it still remains to be proved that these two transcripts actually interact in vivo, first evidence for such a mechanism has come from transfection experiments in HeLa cells (20) . In these experiments, induction of EPR-1 mRNA suppressed the expression of endogenous survivin, which was followed by increased apoptosis and reduction of cell number. Further investigations will have to show whether the newly identified splice variants might additionally modify these postulated antisense interactions in vitro and in vivo.
Taken together, the identification of two novel splice variants will have profound implications for our understanding of survivin actions. These splice variants may not only be involved in the regulation of apoptosis during fetal development but may also determine the response of cancer cells to apoptosis-inducing stimuli such as anticancer drugs and irradiation. Elucidation of the mechanisms controlling the expression and alternative splicing of survivin, therefore, could facilitate the disruption of a potent antiapoptotic mechanism in cancer cells. This intervention could selectively increase the susceptibility of cancer cells to apoptosis-based treatment strategies without affecting viability of nonneoplastic tissues that do not express survivin.
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by the Mildred Scheel Stiftung. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Institute of Pathology, Heinrich Heine University, Moorenstr. 5, D-40225 Duesseldorf, Germany. Phone: 49-211-811-8348; Fax: 49-211-811-8353.
3 The abbreviations used are: IAP, inhibitor of apoptosis protein; BIR, baculovirus IAP repeat; TRAF, tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor; EPR, effector cell protease receptor; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; RT, reverse transcription; EGFP, enhanced green fluorescent protein; SD, splice donor; SA, splice acceptor.
Received 5/12/99. Accepted 10/29/99.
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TopABSTRACTIntroductionMaterials and MethodsResultsDiscussionREFERENCES |
|---|
1 resistance: an important progression factor in human renal cell carcinoma. Lab. Investig., 76: 739-749, 1997.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  C. M. Connell, R. Colnaghi, and S. P. Wheatley Nuclear Survivin Has Reduced Stability and Is Not Cytoprotective J. Biol. Chem., February 8, 2008; 283(6): 3289 - 3296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Hu, Y. Shikama, I. Matsuoka, and J. Kimura Terminally differentiated neutrophils predominantly express Survivin-2{alpha}, a dominant-negative isoform of Survivin J. Leukoc. Biol., February 1, 2008; 83(2): 393 - 400. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C.-l. Huang, D. Liu, J. Nakano, H. Yokomise, M. Ueno, K. Kadota, and H. Wada E2F1 Overexpression Correlates with Thymidylate Synthase and Survivin Gene Expressions and Tumor Proliferation in Non Small-Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 13(23): 6938 - 6946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Troeger, M. Siepermann, G. Escherich, R. Meisel, R. Willers, S. Gudowius, T. Moritz, H.-J. Laws, H. Hanenberg, U. Goebel, et al. Survivin and its prognostic significance in pediatric acute B-cell precursor lymphoblastic leukemia Haematologica, August 1, 2007; 92(8): 1043 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Kaneko, N. Tsuji, K. Asanuma, H. Tanabe, D. Kobayashi, and N. Watanabe Survivin Down-regulation Plays a Crucial Role in 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor-induced Apoptosis in Cancer J. Biol. Chem., July 6, 2007; 282(27): 19273 - 19281. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Caldas, J. R. Fangusaro, D. R. Boue, M. P. Holloway, and R. A. Altura Dissecting the role of endothelial SURVIVIN {Delta}Ex3 in angiogenesis Blood, February 15, 2007; 109(4): 1479 - 1489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. Marconi, K. Dallaglio, R. Lotti, C. Vaschieri, F. Truzzi, F. Fantini, and C. Pincelli Survivin Identifies Keratinocyte Stem Cells and Is Downregulated by Anti-{beta}1 Integrin During Anoikis Stem Cells, January 1, 2007; 25(1): 149 - 155. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. N. Span, V. C.G. Tjan-Heijnen, J. J.T.M. Heuvel, J. B. de Kok, J. A. Foekens, and F. C.G.J. Sweep Do the Survivin (BIRC5) Splice Variants Modulate or Add to the Prognostic Value of Total Survivin in Breast Cancer? Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1693 - 1700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Fujino, M. Ueda, M. Takehara, H. Futakuchi, K. Kanda, Y. Yamashita, Y. Terai, and M. Ueki Transcriptional expression of survivin and its splice variants in endometriosis Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2006; 12(6): 383 - 388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R.-I. You, M.-C. Chen, H.-W. Wang, Y.-C. Chou, C.-H. Lin, and S.-L. Hsieh Inhibition of Lymphotoxin-{beta} Receptor-Mediated Cell Death by Survivin-{Delta}Ex3. Cancer Res., March 15, 2006; 66(6): 3051 - 3061. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. K. Singh, N. N. Singh, E. J. Androphy, and R. N. Singh Splicing of a Critical Exon of Human Survival Motor Neuron Is Regulated by a Unique Silencer Element Located in the Last Intron Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2006; 26(4): 1333 - 1346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H Caldas, M P Holloway, B M Hall, S J Qualman, and R A Altura Survivin-directed RNA interference cocktail is a potent suppressor of tumour growth in vivo J. Med. Genet., February 1, 2006; 43(2): 119 - 128. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. A. Noton, R. Colnaghi, S. Tate, C. Starck, A. Carvalho, P. K. Ferrigno, and S. P. Wheatley Molecular Analysis of Survivin Isoforms: EVIDENCE THAT ALTERNATIVELY SPLICED VARIANTS DO NOT PLAY A ROLE IN MITOSIS J. Biol. Chem., January 13, 2006; 281(2): 1286 - 1295. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Z. Wang, J. Sampath, S. Fukuda, and L. M. Pelus Disruption of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Survivin Sensitizes Bcr-abl-Positive Cells to STI571-Induced Apoptosis Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8224 - 8232. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Jiang, A. de Bruin, H. Caldas, J. Fangusaro, J. Hayes, E. M. Conway, M. L. Robinson, and R. A. Altura Essential Role for Survivin in Early Brain Development J. Neurosci., July 27, 2005; 25(30): 6962 - 6970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Kumazawa, K. Kawamura, T. Sato, N. Sato, Y. Konishi, Y. Shimizu, J. Fukuda, H. Kodoma, and T. Tanaka HCG up-regulates survivin mRNA in human granulosa cells Mol. Hum. Reprod., March 1, 2005; 11(3): 161 - 166. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. NOTARBARTOLO, M. CERVELLO, L. GIANNITRAPANI, M. MELI, P. POMA, L. DUSONCHET, G. MONTALTO, and N. D'ALESSANDRO Expression of IAPs and Alternative Splice Variants in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tissues and Cells Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., December 1, 2004; 1028(1): 289 - 293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Pizzoferrato, Y. Liu, A. Gambotto, M. J. Armstrong, M. T. Stang, W. E. Gooding, S. M. Alber, S. H. Shand, S. C. Watkins, W. J. Storkus, et al. Ectopic Expression of Interferon Regulatory Factor-1 Promotes Human Breast Cancer Cell Death and Results in Reduced Expression of Survivin Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 64(22): 8381 - 8388. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. E. Johnson and E. W. Howerth Survivin: A Bifunctional Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein Vet. Pathol., November 1, 2004; 41(6): 599 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 B. Vischioni, P. van der Valk, S. W. Span, F. A. E. Kruyt, J. A. Rodriguez, and G. Giaccone Nuclear localization of survivin is a positive prognostic factor for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Ann. Onc., November 1, 2004; 15(11): 1654 - 1660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Yang, A. Welm, and J. M. Bishop Cell division and cell survival in the absence of survivin PNAS, October 19, 2004; 101(42): 15100 - 15105. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. J. Schultz, L. A. Kiemeney, H. F.M. Karthaus, J. A. Witjes, J. L. Willems, D. W. Swinkels, J. M.T. K. Gunnewiek, and J. B. de Kok Survivin mRNA Copy Number in Bladder Washings Predicts Tumor Recurrence in Patients with Superficial Urothelial Cell Carcinomas Clin. Chem., August 1, 2004; 50(8): 1425 - 1428. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Asanuma, N. Tsuji, T. Endoh, A. Yagihashi, and N. Watanabe Survivin Enhances Fas Ligand Expression via Up-Regulation of Specificity Protein 1-Mediated Gene Transcription in Colon Cancer Cells J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3922 - 3929. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Z. Song, S. Liu, H. He, N. Hoti, Y. Wang, S. Feng, and M. Wu A Single Amino Acid Change (Asp 53-> Ala53) Converts Survivin from Anti-apoptotic to Pro-apoptotic Mol. Biol. Cell, March 1, 2004; 15(3): 1287 - 1296. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. P. Wheatley, A. J. Henzing, H. Dodson, W. Khaled, and W. C. Earnshaw Aurora-B Phosphorylation in Vitro Identifies a Residue of Survivin That Is Essential for Its Localization and Binding to Inner Centromere Protein (INCENP) in Vivo J. Biol. Chem., February 13, 2004; 279(7): 5655 - 5660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Beltrami, J. Plescia, J. C. Wilkinson, C. S. Duckett, and D. C. Altieri Acute Ablation of Survivin Uncovers p53-dependent Mitotic Checkpoint Functions and Control of Mitochondrial Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., January 16, 2004; 279(3): 2077 - 2084. [Abstract] [Full Text] [ |
50% in all transfection experiments. The percentage of transfected cells was determined by microscopic evaluation of