| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1.8 kb in length) was cloned into pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen Corp., San Diego, CA) via the TA cloning method and sequenced in both strands by the dRhodamine terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The RPCI-11 human BAC library4
was screened using a 430-bp hTERT cDNA fragment (nucleotides 18447 in GenBank AF015950) as a hybridization probe at Research Genetics, Inc. (Huntsville, AL). Two resultant positive BAC clones were sequenced by the BigDye terminator cycle sequencing kit (PE Applied Biosystems) using the primers that were designed based on the sequences from the PCR-based clones described above. A DNA homology search was performed at the National Center for Biotechnology Information using the basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) network service. Potential transcription factor binding sites were predicted by TESS (Transcription Element Search Software5
) search program. A search for the CpG island was carried out using GRAIL (Gene Recognition and Assembly Internet Link, Version 1.36
). The hTERT promoter sequence shown in Fig. 1
|
Construction of Luciferase Reporter Gene Constructs.
An
1.7-kb SacI/Eco47III fragment (-1665 to 5 in Fig. 1
; SacI site was at the multiple cloning sites of the pCR2.1) was ligated to the SacI/SmaI-digested pGL3-Basic vector (Promega Corp., Madison, WI) to allow transcription of firefly luciferase gene under the control of this fragment. The resultant plasmid (pGL3B-TRTP) was digested with SacI and StuI and then divided into two reactions: one was end-polished by T4 DNA polymerase and self-circularized (pBT-SE); and the other was subject to the unidirectional deletions by the Exonuclease III/Mung bean nuclease system (Stratagene Cloning Systems, La Jolla, CA) to make a series of constructs shown in Fig. 3
(pBTdel-X: -X means the nucleotide number in Fig. 1
where the fragment starts). A 251-bp fragment (-211 to 40) was PCR amplified and cloned into the SacI/SmaI-digested pGL3-Basic to produce the plasmid p2XEB. All plasmid DNAs were purified with the QIAfilter plasmid kit (Qiagen, Inc., Chatsworth, CA) and confirmed to have correct sequences by nucleotide sequencing, and their quantity and quality were routinely checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.
|
For luciferase assay, cells (5 to 7.5 x 104) were seeded on 24-well plates, cultured overnight, and transfected with the plasmids described above (1 µg/well) by using the SuperFect transfection reagent (Qiagen). For better comparison among cell lines with different transfection efficiencies (data shown in Table 1
), the pGL3-Control plasmid (1 µg/well; Promega), which has the firefly luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of SV40 enhancer/promoter, was also transfected into each cell line and used for normalization of the activities shown by the hTERT promoter-luciferase construct. For experiments to identify DNA elements responsible for the hTERT promoter activity in endogenous hTERT mRNA-expressing cells (data shown in Fig. 3
), the control plasmid, pRL-SV40 (1 ng/well; Promega) containing the Renilla reniformis luciferase gene under the transcriptional control of SV40 enhancer/promoter, was cotransfected with the hTERT promoter-luciferase constructs (1 µg/well, as described above). The level of firefly luciferase activity was normalized to that of Renilla reniformis luciferase activity for each transfection. To investigate a role of c-Myc protein in the hTERT gene transcription (data shown in Fig. 4
), a human c-myc cDNA expression plasmid, RSVmycSVpA (a kind gift from Dr. Chi V. Dang, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD), or an empty vector (0.5 µg/well) was cotransfected with the hTERT promoter-luciferase constructs (0.5 µg/well) and the pRL-SV40 (1 ng/well) into the hTERT mRNA-negative SUSM-1 cells. For all experiments, cells were cultured for 4548 h after transfection, and cell lysates were prepared and examined by using the Dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and the MLX microtiter plate luminometer (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA). All of the data shown in this study were obtained from at least three independent experiments.
|
|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
120 to
190 bases were reproducibly observed in the hTERT mRNA-expressing CMV-Mj-HEL-1, RCC23, huH-4 (hepatocellular carcinoma, Ref. 19
; see below) and SiHa cells, but not in hTERT mRNA-negative SUSM-1, normal human fibroblasts, and RCC23+3 cells (Fig. 2
135 bases in length. This suggests that a G nucleotide, which lies 55 bp upstream of the translational initiation codon, is a major transcription initiation site, which matches the 5'-end of the hTERT cDNA sequence reported by Nakamura et al. 11
. We thus refer to this G as +1 in this manuscript. A 390-base fragment was protected only in the hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, huH-4, which suggests an alternate transcription initiation upstream of -255.
|
To examine the transcriptional activity of the hTERT gene promoter, we first put the 1670-bp fragment (-1665 to 5) upstream of the firefly luciferase gene in the pGL3-Basic vector. The resultant plasmid pGL3B-TRTP was transiently transfected in the endogenous hTERT mRNA-expressing and nonexpressing cells, and the firefly luciferase activity obtained was compared with those from the pGL3-Basic vector alone and the pGL3-Control plasmid, which was used to monitor transfection efficiency (Table 1)
. In the hTERT mRNA-positive cells of both fibroblastic (CMV-Mj-HEL-1) and epithelial (SiHa and RCC23) origins, the pGL3B-TRTP showed significant activities, i.e., 6.030.9% of the pGL3-Control, or 5070-fold of the baseline activity of the pGL3-Basic vector. The highest, normalized luciferase activity observed in the CMV-Mj-HEL-1 cells is consistent with the highest expression of endogenous hTERT mRNA in this cell line, as shown in the RNase protection assay (Fig. 2)
, making our results convincing. In marked contrast, the pGL3B-TRTP construct resulted in no or little luciferase activity (0.21.0% of the pGL3-Control; 1.33-fold of the pGL3-Basic) in the hTERT mRNA-negative cells including normal human fibroblasts, SUSM-1, and RCC23+3. These data suggest that the regulation of hTERT gene expression occurs mainly at the transcriptional level, rather than at the posttranscriptional level such as control of mRNA stability. This is also consistent with our finding that treatment of hTERT mRNA-negative cells with cycloheximide to diminish short-lived RNases did not induce the hTERT mRNA expression (data not shown).
We next made a series of luciferase constructs containing unidirectionally deleted fragments from the pGL3B-TRTP and used them for luciferase assay to determine the elements responsible for the hTERT gene promoter activity (Fig. 3)
. The plasmid pBTdel-279 (containing -279 to 5) showed the highest promoter activity in the CMV-Mj-HEL-1 and SiHa cells, and pBTdel-408 (containing -408 to 5) was highest in the RCC23 cells. Reduced activities up to
50% of the full promoter activity shown by the constructs containing longer fragments might either reflect the presence of negative regulatory element(s) or be due to the lower transfection efficiency of the larger construct. It is notable that the deletion of the 59-bp region from -208 to -150 resulted in the remarkably decreased promoter activity in all of the cell lines tested, suggesting the presence of a cis-element(s) responsible for the maximal promoter activity within this 59-bp region. Interestingly, the region contains a typical E-box (CACGTG, -187 to -182 in Fig. 1
), which is known as a potential binding site of the bHLHZ class of transcription factors such as the c-Myc oncoprotein and the upstream stimulatory factor 21
. There is another typical E-box downstream of the major transcription initiation site (22 to 27). The plasmid p2XEB (-211 to 40) containing both of the E-boxes showed similar activity to that of the pBTdel-208 (-208 to 5) or pBTdel-279 (-279 to 5) containing only an upstream E-box, suggesting that the downstream E-box does not have an additive or synergistic effect at least in our transient transfection experiments. As shown in the constructs pBTdel-149 and pBTdel-130, a low but significant transcriptional activity (2035% of the full promoter activity) was observed, even without either E-box.
To examine a role of the Myc protein in the hTERT gene transcription, a human c-myc cDNA expression plasmid was cotransfected with the hTERT promoter-luciferase constructs in the endogenous hTERT mRNA-negative SUSM-1 cells (Fig. 4)
. The c-Myc expression markedly induced the luciferase activity when the constructs containing the upstream E-box (pBTdel-408 and pBTdel-208), but not the pGL3-Basic vector and the pBTdel-149 lacking it, were used. This clearly suggests that the expression of c-Myc protein positively regulates the hTERT gene transcription, probably through the E-box within the 59-bp region identified above. A slight induction observed in the pBTdel-149 might reflect an indirect effect of c-Myc protein by modulating other regulatory factors.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
By using a series of unidirectionally deleted fragments derived from the hTERT gene promoter, we identified a 59-bp region (-208 to -150 in Fig. 1
) that is responsible for the maximal promoter activity in human immortal cells of both fibroblastic and epithelial origins. Among the potential transcription factor binding sites within this 59-bp region, a typical E-box (CACGTG, -187 to -182), to which the bHLHZ family of transcription factors bind 21
, is likely to play an important role for the hTERT gene transcription. We showed that the expression of a member of this family, c-Myc oncoprotein, markedly induces the transcriptional activity of the E-box-containing hTERT gene promoter in the endogenous hTERT-negative SUSM-1 cells (Fig. 4)
. We also observed a 37-fold increase of the promoter activity by the c-Myc expression in the endogenous hTERT-positive cell lines (data not shown). These results suggest an important role of c-Myc in positive regulation of the hTERT gene expression and telomerase activation. This is consistent with the finding by Wang et al. 22
that retroviral expression of c-Myc increases the amount of hTERT mRNA and activates telomerase in human mammary epithelial cells and fibroblasts, although their work did not include transcriptional regulation of the hTERT gene. Considering that activation of c-Myc is a common target of several oncogenic signals, e.g., mutant p53 proteins 23
, viral oncoproteins 24
, and defects in the adenomatous polyposis coli/ß-catenin pathway 25
, an attractive hypothesis is that these oncogenic signals converge on the transactivation of the hTERT gene promoter through c-Myc activation as a part of their oncogenic functions. Involvement of other factors is also possible, including other bHLHZ transcription factors such as upstream stimulatory factor 21
, members of the Ets family of oncoproteins, which are known to cooperate with the bHLHZ proteins 26
, 27
, and the AP-2 family of transcription factors. We are presently investigating direct bindings of these factors, as well as c-Myc protein, to potential binding sites and their functional significance. Although the second typical E-box downstream of the major transcription initiation site appeared to contribute little to the hTERT gene promoter activity in the presence of the upstream E-box (see p2XEB in Fig. 3
), there is a possibility that the downstream E-box also acts as a positive regulatory element but is functionally redundant with the upstream one. Additional experiments will be needed to address this issue. It should also be noted that the constructs without either E-box (pBTdel-149 and pBTdel-130) still showed low, but significant, promoter activity. Multiple potential binding sites for the Sp1 and MAZ proteins, which function cooperatively at some promoters 28
, 29
, are likely to be responsible for this basal activity of the hTERT gene promoter. Indeed, the Sp1 binding was confirmed in the hTERT mRNA-positive cell lines by a supershift on gel mobility shift assay using a 20-bp probe (-117 to -98, data not shown).
Although in this study we focused our attention on the elements that positively regulate the hTERT gene transcription, the mechanisms involved in the transcriptional repression of the hTERT gene in normal human somatic cells are also of great interest. Although positive regulatory factors, e.g., c-Myc protein, may explain enhanced transcriptional activity, negative regulatory factors that function in telomerase-negative cells may play a role in the transcriptional repression. The hTERT gene promoter sequence and a series of constructs generated in this study may help to identify DNA elements and protein factors that negatively regulate the hTERT gene transcription. It has also been suggested that chromatin structure is a major determinant of gene activity 30 . In this respect, the highly GC-rich content, forming a CpG island, of the hTERT gene promoter is notable. Increased DNA methylation and associated histone deacetylation could turn off the hTERT gene expression by establishing and maintaining an inactive state of chromatin structure.
Finally, we found a genomic rearrangement at the hTERT promoter region in a hepatocellular carcinoma cell line huH-4. The rearrangement probably resulted from the integration of the viral (HBV) genome into the promoter region, which is reminiscent of the activation of some oncogenes by insertion of viral genomes 31 , 32 . Determination of the precise structure of the HBV integration and examination of the transcriptional activity of the rearranged promoter will be needed to clarify functional significance of this rearrangement.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 I. H. is supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Research Fellowship for Japanese Biomedical and Behavioral Researchers at NIH. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory of Molecular Carcinogenesis, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P. O. Box 12233, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709. Phone: (919) 541-2992; Fax: (919) 541-7784; E-mail: barrett{at}niehs.nih.gov ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: hTERT, human telomerase reverse transcriptase; BAC, bacterial artificial chromosome; HBV, hepatitis B virus; bHLHZ, basic helix-loop-helix zipper. ![]()
4 http://bacpac.med.buffalo.edu. ![]()
5 http://www.cbil.upenn.edu/tess. ![]()
6 http://compbio.ornl.gov/Grail-1.3. ![]()
Received 10/30/98. Accepted 12/31/98.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and c-myc promoters by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 protein. Virology, 232: 53-61, 1997.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Xu, W. Luo, D. J. Elzi, C. Grandori, and D. A. Galloway NFX1 Interacts with mSin3A/Histone Deacetylase To Repress hTERT Transcription in Keratinocytes Mol. Cell. Biol., August 1, 2008; 28(15): 4819 - 4828. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. J. Bauerschmitz, T. Ranki, L. Kangasniemi, C. Ribacka, M. Eriksson, M. Porten, I. Herrmann, A. Ristimaki, P. Virkkunen, M. Tarkkanen, et al. Tissue-Specific Promoters Active in CD44+CD24-/low Breast Cancer Cells Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5533 - 5539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-J. Chen, H. G. Campbell, A. K. Wiles, M. R. Eccles, R. R. Reddel, A. W. Braithwaite, and J. A. Royds PAX8 Regulates Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase and Telomerase RNA Component in Glioma Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 68(14): 5724 - 5732. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Chen, J. Zhang, Y. Fang, C. Zhao, and Y. Zhu Ginsenoside Rg1 Delays Tert-Butyl Hydroperoxide-Induced Premature Senescence in Human WI-38 Diploid Fibroblast Cells J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2008; 63(3): 253 - 264. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Bellon and C. Nicot Regulation of Telomerase and Telomeres: Human Tumor Viruses Take Control J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 98 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. DWYER, H. LI, D. XU, and J.-P. LIU Transcriptional Regulation of Telomerase Activity: Roles of the the Ets Transcription Factor Family Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., October 1, 2007; 1114(1): 36 - 47. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Wooten-Blanks, P. Song, C. E. Senkal, and B. Ogretmen Mechanisms of ceramide-mediated repression of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter via deacetylation of Sp3 by histone deacetylase 1 FASEB J, October 1, 2007; 21(12): 3386 - 3397. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Oikonomou, I. Messinis, and A. Tsezou DNA Methylation Is Not Likely to Be Responsible for hTERT Expression in Premalignant Cervical Lesions Experimental Biology and Medicine, July 1, 2007; 232(7): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. LEZHAVA and T. JOKHADZE Activation of Pericentromeric and Telomeric Heterochromatin in Cultured Lymphocytes from Old Individuals Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 1, 2007; 1100(1): 387 - 399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Renaud, D. Loukinov, Z. Abdullaev, I. Guilleret, F. T. Bosman, V. Lobanenkov, and J. Benhattar Dual role of DNA methylation inside and outside of CTCF-binding regions in the transcriptional regulation of the telomerase hTERT gene Nucleic Acids Res., February 28, 2007; 35(4): 1245 - 1256. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G.-S. Shieh, A.-L. Shiau, Y.-T. Yo, P.-R. Lin, C.-C. Chang, T.-S. Tzai, and C.-L. Wu Low-Dose Etoposide Enhances Telomerase-Dependent Adenovirus-Mediated Cytosine Deaminase Gene Therapy through Augmentation of Adenoviral Infection and Transgene Expression in a Syngeneic Bladder Tumor Model. Cancer Res., October 15, 2006; 66(20): 9957 - 9966. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Hoffmann and O. Wildner Enhanced killing of pancreatic cancer cells by expression of fusogenic membrane glycoproteins in combination with chemotherapy. Mol. Cancer Ther., August 1, 2006; 5(8): 2013 - 2022. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Racek, N. Mise, Z. Li, A. Stoll, and B. M. Putzer C-terminal p73 Isoforms Repress Transcriptional Activity of the Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (hTERT) Promoter J. Biol. Chem., December 9, 2005; 280(49): 40402 - 40405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Renaud, D. Loukinov, F. T. Bosman, V. Lobanenkov, and J. Benhattar CTCF binds the proximal exonic region of hTERT and inhibits its transcription Nucleic Acids Res., December 2, 2005; 33(21): 6850 - 6860. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Faiola, X. Liu, S. Lo, S. Pan, K. Zhang, E. Lymar, A. Farina, and E. Martinez Dual Regulation of c-Myc by p300 via Acetylation-Dependent Control of Myc Protein Turnover and Coactivation of Myc-Induced Transcription Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2005; 25(23): 10220 - 10234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Quante, S. Heeg, A. von Werder, G. Goessel, C. Fulda, M. Doebele, H. Nakagawa, R. Beijersbergen, H. E. Blum, and O. G. Opitz Differential transcriptional regulation of human telomerase in a cellular model representing important genetic alterations in esophageal squamous carcinogenesis Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2005; 26(11): 1879 - 1889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Takakura, S. Kyo, M. Inoue, W. E. Wright, and J. W. Shay Function of AP-1 in Transcription of the Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Gene (TERT) in Human and Mouse Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2005; 25(18): 8037 - 8043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. G. Wooten and B. Ogretmen Sp1/Sp3-dependent Regulation of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Activity by the Bioactive Sphingolipid Ceramide J. Biol. Chem., August 12, 2005; 280(32): 28867 - 28876. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Wang and J. Zhu The hTERT Gene Is Embedded in a Nuclease-resistant Chromatin Domain J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55401 - 55410. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Verma, S. Borah, and E. S. Robertson Latency-Associated Nuclear Antigen of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus Up-Regulates Transcription of Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter through Interaction with Transcription Factor Sp1 J. Virol., October 1, 2004; 78(19): 10348 - 10359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Gewin, H. Myers, T. Kiyono, and D. A. Galloway Identification of a novel telomerase repressor that interacts with the human papillomavirus type-16 E6/E6-AP complex Genes & Dev., September 15, 2004; 18(18): 2269 - 2282. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. S. Goueli and R. Janknecht Upregulation of the Catalytic Telomerase Subunit by the Transcription Factor ER81 and Oncogenic HER2/Neu, Ras, or Raf Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2004; 24(1): 25 - 35. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Xiong, S. Fan, Q. Meng, L. Schramm, C. Wang, B. Bouzahza, J. Zhou, B. Zafonte, I. D. Goldberg, B. R. Haddad, et al. BRCA1 Inhibition of Telomerase Activity in Cultured Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(23): 8668 - 8690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Lanson Jr., P. L. Friedlander, P. Schwarzenberger, J. K. Kolls, and G. Wang Replication of an Adenoviral Vector Controlled by the Human Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase Promoter Causes Tumor-Selective Tumor Lysis Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7936 - 7941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. R. McMurray and D. J. McCance Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E6 Activates TERT Gene Transcription through Induction of c-Myc and Release of USF-Mediated Repression J. Virol., September 15, 2003; 77(18): 9852 - 9861. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takeda, H. Inaba, M. Yamazaki, S. Kyo, T. Miyamoto, S. Suzuki, T. Ehara, T. Kakizawa, M. Hara, L. J. DeGroot, et al. Tumor-Specific G |