Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

[Cancer Research 59, 1514-1519, April 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu-Welliver, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu-Welliver, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
[Cancer Research 59, 1514-1519, April 1, 1999]
© 1999 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Alteration of the Conserved Residue Tyrosine-158 to Histidine Renders Human O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase Insensitive to the Inhibitor O6-Benzylguanine1

Meng Xu-Welliver, José Leitão2, Sreenivas Kanugula and Anthony E. Pegg3

Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The DNA repair protein O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) protects cells from alkylation damage. O6-Benzylguanine (BG) is a potent inactivator of human AGT (ED50 of 0.1 µM) that is currently undergoing clinical trials to enhance chemotherapy by alkylating agents. In a screen of AGT mutants randomly mutated at position glycine-160, we found that the double mutant Y158H/G160A protected Escherichea coli from killing by N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) even in the presence of BG and that the AGT activity of this mutant was strongly resistant to BG (ED50 of 180 µM). Because the single mutant G160A was not resistant to BG, this suggested that the presence of the charged histidine residue at position 158 was responsible. This hypothesis was confirmed by the construction of the single mutation Y158H. The Y158H-mutant AGT was slightly less active than wild-type AGT for the repair of methylated DNA in vitro, but it protected E. coli from killing by MNNG even in the presence of BG and had an ED50 for the inactivation by BG of 620 µM. In contrast, mutant Y158F had an ED50 of 0.2 µM. Previous studies (M. Xu-Welliver et al., Cancer Res., 58: 1936–1945, 1998) have shown that mutant P140K is highly resistant to BG (ED50 of >1200 µM). Models of human AGT suggest that the side chain of the lysine inserted into this mutant is close to tyrosine-158 and that the positively charged lysine side-chain may interfere with BG binding. The double mutants P140K/Y158H and P140K/Y158F resembled P140K and Y158H in being highly resistant to BG, but the use of a sensitive assay for reaction of BG with AGT indicated that their abilities to react were in the order P140K/Y158H < P140K < P140K/Y158F. These results confirm that the presence of a positively charged residue close to the active site of human AGT renders it highly resistant to BG without substantially affecting activity toward methylated DNA substrates. Such mutants may limit the value of BG therapy if they arise in malignant cells during chemotherapy, but the mutant sequences may be useful for gene therapy approaches in which BG-resistant human AGTs are used to prevent hematopoietic toxicity. At least 28 AGT sequences (from 25 species) have now been described. In 25 of these, the position equivalent to 158 in the human AGT is also a tyrosine, and in the other 3, it is a phenylalanine. The importance of an aromatic ring side chain at this position is emphasized by previous studies (S. Edara et al., Carcinogenesis, 16: 1637–1642, 1995), which show that the replacement by alanine renders human AGT inactive. Our results show that histidine can also substitute for tyrosine at this position.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
An important site of damage to DNA produced by reaction with alkylating agents is the O6 position of guanine (1, 2, 3, 4) . This adduct is removed by the action of the DNA repair protein AGT.4 AGT acts to transfer the alkyl group to a cysteine acceptor site (located at residue 145 in human AGT) and to restore the DNA in a single step. The presence of AGT is known to protect cells from alkylating agent-mediated toxicity including mutagenesis, cell killing, and carcinogenesis. However, the presence of AGT in tumors provides resistance to therapeutic alkylating agents (5, 6, 7) . Human AGT is strongly inhibited by BG (8) . BG acts as a substrate for AGT. It is bound at the active site, and AGT-mediated transfer of the benzyl group to the cysteine acceptor site causes its inactivation (9) . The combination of BG and BCNU is currently undergoing clinical trials for cancer chemotherapy (6 , 7 , 10) .

AGT appears to be a very widely distributed protein, and sequences are now known from at least 25 different species. Some of the microbial AGTs have been found to be very resistant to inactivation by BG (9) . Several human AGT mutants with a reduced ability to react with BG have been obtained either by site-directed mutagenesis (11, 12, 13, 14) or by screening cDNA libraries containing random insertions in the AGT sequences for the ability to protect E. coli from killing by MNNG in the presence of BG (14, 15, 16) .

Such resistant mutants are of interest for several reasons: (a) they suggest that resistance to BG therapy may arise relatively readily, and it will be necessary to obtain additional AGT inhibitors able to inactivate these resistant mutants; (b) the comparison of BG-sensitive and BG-resistant AGT mutants provides more information about the interaction of the protein and the drug that should prove valuable in designing improved inhibitors with greater potency and specificity; and (c) the dose-limiting toxicity of therapy with BG plus alkylating agents is myelosuppression, which is due to the very low level of AGT in bone marrow progenitor cells (17 , 18) . The use of a BG-resistant AGT-mutant protein for gene therapy approaches in which an AGT is expressed from a suitable vector in hematopoietic cells may overcome this toxicity and improve the chemotherapeutic index of the treatment because the tumor would remain sensitive whereas the bone marrow would be resistant (19, 20, 21, 22) .

We (12, 13, 14) and others (15 , 16) have, therefore, been attempting to produce a panel of BG-resistant mutants and to identify the major factors involved in permitting AGT to continue to work on DNA adducts but to be inactive on BG. A screening method to obtain such mutants was set up by using the ability of expressed human AGT to protect a BG-permeable E. coli strain lacking endogenous alkyltransferase (TRG8) from killing by MNNG (14) . This protection was abolished by BG. We have shown that this screen can be used to identify BG-resistant mutants in human AGT containing a random sequence inserted in place of the codons corresponding to amino acids 138–140 (14) . This screen indicated that the conversion of proline-140 to lysine (mutant P140K) produced by far the greatest resistance of any point mutation, increasing the ED50 value for inactivation by more than 12,000-fold.

Another position at which human AGT can be altered to provide resistance to BG is at glycine-160. This was discovered by the comparison of the properties of a naturally occurring variant G160R that was found in a minority of Japanese subjects (23) with wild-type AGT (13) . The G160R AGT was slightly more resistant to BG (20-fold increase in ED50), whereas the mutants G160A and G160W, which were made as controls, were found to be more sensitive than wild type (13) . The finding that G160W was sensitive to BG was later confirmed by Rafferty et al. (24) .

In the course of studies of the possible-BG resistance of an AGT-mutant population in which the codon at position 160 was replaced by NNS to produce a complete library covering replacements with all amino acids, we have now found a highly BG-resistant mutant. However, sequencing of this mutant revealed that it contained the double change Y158H/G160A. The G160A mutation was unlikely to explain the properties of this mutant because previous work had shown that G160A mutant AGT is not resistant but is slightly more sensitive than wild-type AGT (13) . Also, position 158 in AGT sequences is highly conserved with 25 of 28 known AGT sequences having tyrosine and the other three having the closely related phen-ylalanine.

We have, therefore, constructed the Y158H-mutant AGT by site-directed mutagenesis and carried out a detailed study of this and related AGT mutants. These studies show that the Y158H AGT is active in repairing DNA and is highly resistant to BG. Molecular modeling studies suggest that the charged residues on the side chains of either the P140K or the Y158H mutants may be present in the same vicinity at the AGT active site. The presence of a charged hydrophilic residue in this position may prevent the binding of the hydrophobic BG.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials.
All oligodeoxynucleotides were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). E. coli strain TRG8 was derived from strain GWR109 (25) that was kindly provided by Dr. L Samson (Department of Molecular and Cellular Toxicology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA). pQE30 plasmid and the DNA isolation kits were obtained from Qiagen (Chatsworth, CA). Restriction enzymes and Pfu polymerase were purchased from New England Biolabs (Beverly, MA) and Stratagene (La Jolla, CA). T4-ligase and the Talon Metal Affinity Resin were purchased from Clonetech (Palo Alto, CA). Ampicillin, kanamycin, isopropyl ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside, hemocyanin, and most of the other biochemical reagents were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). BG was synthesized (8) and generously provided by Dr. R. C. Moschel (ABL-Basic Research Program, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, MD). [8-3H]BG (0.34 mCi/mmol) was prepared by catalytic tritium exchange of BG with tritiated water by Amersham Corporation (26) .

Plasmids for Expression of AGT.
AGT was expressed in the pUC-18 vector for selection and studies in E. coli extracts. Expression from the pQE or pIN vectors was used for purification of the recombinant protein. Plasmids pUC-AGT (14) , pQE-AGT (13) , pQE-P140K (14) , pIN-Y158F, and pIN-Y158A (27) have been described previously.

The pUC-Y158H mutant was made by PCR by using primer 1 (5'–CCGTTTTCCAGCAAGAGTCG-3') matching nt 310 to nt 432 in the pQE-AGT plasmid and primer 2 (5'–CCTTCACGGCTAGCCCTCCGGAGTGGTTGCCCACGGCTCC-3') for the mutation of the codon for tyrosine-158 to histidine (mismatch is underlined and NheI site is shown in italics). The PCR reaction was done using Pfu polymerase (Stratagene) with pQE-AGT plasmid as template under the following conditions: (a) initial denaturation for 2 min at 92°C; (b) 25 cycles of denaturation (30 s at 92°C); (c) annealing (30 s at 52°C); and (d) extension (30 s at 72°C) followed by a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR product (236 bp) was purified, digested with MluI and NheI and ligated into the pUC-inAGT2 plasmid (described below in the next section of "Materials and Methods") digested with the same enzymes to form pUC-Y158H. Plasmid pQE-Y158H was made by ligation of the 243-bp DNA containing the sequence for the Y158H mutation (obtained by digestion of pUC-Y158H with MluI and AgeI) with pQE-AGT digested with the same enzymes.

The P140K/Y158H mutant AGT was generated by using pQE-P140K and pQE-Y158H. The 1.2-kb fragment between the DraIII (at 436) and the XbaI (at 1600) restriction sites from pQE-Y158H was ligated with the 2.8-kb fragment from pQE-P140K digested with the same enzymes to form pQE-P140K/Y158H.

The P140K/Y158F mutant was generated by using the pQE-P140K and pIN-Y158F DNA constructs. The 390-bp fragment from pIN-Y158F generated by DraIII digestion (which cuts the pIN-AGT plasmid at two sites at 436 and 826 because of a site in the vector sequence) was isolated. This fragment was further digested with the AgeI restriction enzyme (at 521), dephosphorylated, and ligated with the large fragment from pQE-P140K digested with DraIII (at 436) and AgeI (at 521) to form pQE-P140K/Y158F.

The entire AGT coding region of all of the plasmids used for AGT expression and activity measurements were sequenced to ensure no secondary mutations were formed.

Construction and Screening of AGT Library with a Random Sequence Corresponding to AGT Codon 160.
A 1040-bp irrelevant inactivating sequence was inserted into the AGT cDNA in pGEMAGT2 (14) between the DraIII (at 436) and the NheI (at 483) sites to prevent contamination of the library with wild-type AGT. The DNA insert was created by PCR using Pfu polymerase and pCM9 (28) as template with sense primer 5'-GGAAGCTGCACAGAGTGTCGAAGGGACCGAGAAGC-3' (mismatches underlined) to create the DraIII site (shown in italics) and the antisense primer 5'-CGACTCTAGCTAGCATCCACCACC-3' (mismatches underlined) to create the NheI site (shown in italics). The PCR product was purified by the PCR Purification kit (Qiagen), digested with DraIII and NheI, and ligated into pGEM-AGT2 plasmid digested with the same enzymes to form pGEM-inAGT2. From this plasmid, the 1078-bp piece fragment between DraIII and AgeI sites was isolated and inserted into the large fragment (3 kb) from pUC-AGT plasmid digested with the same enzymes to form pUC-inAGT2. The resulting plasmid, pUC-inAGT2, was then used for insertion of the random sequences. The DNA insert containing the random sequences was created by PCR covering the AGT coding region from 420 to 540, including the DraIII site (at 436) and the AgeI site (at 521), using as the sense primer, 5'-CCGTGCCACAGAGTGGTCTGCAGCAGCGGAGCCGTGGGCAACTA-CTCCNNSGGGCTAGCCGTGAAGG-3', and as the antisense primer, 5'-GGCTTCCCCAACCGGTGGCC-3', (mismatches underlined, and restriction sites shown in italics). The PCR reaction was carried out using Pfu polymerase and pUC-AGT as the template under the same conditions as described above. The PCR product was gel-purified, digested with DraIII and AgeI enzymes, and ligated into pUC-inAGT2 digested with the same enzymes. The ligated products were used to transform XL1-Blue cells. An aliquot of the transformation mixture was plated on LB plates supplemented with 50 µg/ml ampicillin to determine the total number of plasmid-containing bacteria, which was found to be about 2.5 x 105. The remainder of the transformation mixture was amplified by growing overnight. The plasmid DNA was isolated, subjected to sequencing analysis to confirm that the randomized sequence was present, and introduced into the TRG8 strain by electroporation. An aliquot of the sample was plated to determine the efficiency of transformation (2 x 108 transformants/µg DNA), and the rest was amplified overnight in LB medium containing ampicillin and kanamycin (50 µg/ml each). Aliquots of this library were either subjected to the screening process or stored at -70°C for further use.

The screening for active and BG-resistant AGT mutants was carried out as described previously (14) using treatment with 50 µM BG for 1.5 h followed by 40 µg/ml MNNG for 0.5 h at 25°C. Crude extracts for the determination of AGT activity were prepared from the independent mutants grown overnight in 10 ml of LB medium by sonicating the bacterial pellet resuspended in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM DTT for 2 min at 0°C using an ultrasonic cell disruptor model W-225-R on pulse setting 50% duty cycle. Cell debris was pelleted by centrifugation at 4°C for 15 min at 15,000 x g, and the supernatant was used to determine the AGT activity and its sensitivity to BG.

MNNG Survival Assay in the Presence of BG.
TRG8 bacteria containing plasmids expressing wild-type Y158H or Y158H/G160A AGT were grown in 5 ml of LB media containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml kanamycin with agitation at 250 rpm in a water bath at 37°C until the A600 was 0.5. The cultures were then pelleted, washed, resuspended in 1 ml of LB media and divided into two 0.5-ml aliquots, one of which was supplemented with 250 µM BG. The tubes were agitated at 250 rpm for 1.5 h at 25°C before an additional 2 ml of media with or without BG was added to restore the original volume. After BG treatment, the cultures were exposed to MNNG (0–40 µg/ml) for 30 min. The reactions were stopped by diluting small aliquots of the bacteria cultures in M9 media on ice. The bacteria were further diluted and spread on LB plates containing 50 µg/ml ampicillin and 50 µg/ml kanamycin with or without 100 µM BG. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 16 h, and the colony numbers were determined. The percentage of survival was determined by using the colony number/ml of culture exposed to MNNG divided by the colony number/ml of culture when MNNG was absent.

Purification of AGT.
The wild type and all of the mutants except Y158F were expressed using the pQE vector, which adds a 12-amino acid sequence [MRGS (H)6GS-) to the NH2 terminus of the AGT protein, and were purified by immobilized metal affinity chromatography as described previously (13 , 14) . The recombinant Y158F mutant protein was produced using the pIN-Y158F plasmid and was purified as described (27) .

Determination of Effects of BG on AGT Activity.
Inactivation of the AGT activity by BG in crude bacterial extracts or purified protein preparations was measured by incubating aliquots of the protein with different concentrations of BG at 37°C for 30 min in 0.5 ml of 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM DTT, and 0.1 mM EDTA containing 50 µg hemocyanin and 10 µg calf thymus DNA (14) . The residual AGT activity was determined, and the results were expressed as the percentage of the AGT activity remaining. Graphs of AGT activity remaining against inhibitor concentration were used to calculate an ED50 value representing the amount of inhibitor needed to produce a 50% loss of activity.

Measurements of the formation of [8-3H]guanine from [8-3H]BG were carried out as described previously (26) using various amounts of the purified AGT proteins in an assay buffer consisting of 0.7 µMO6-benzyl-[3H]guanine, 25 µg of calf thymus DNA, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 0.1 mM EDTA, and 5 mM DTT in an assay volume of 0.25 ml.

Kinetics of Repair by AGT.
The rate constant for the AGT reaction was determined by measuring the appearance of the [3H]methylated AGT at various times using concentrations of AGT protein determined in preliminary experiments to readily measurable rates under the assay conditions (29) . The reaction mixture (1 ml) for each time point contained AGT (4.5 x 10-10M for wild type, 2.75 x 10-9M for Y158H, 6.5 x 10-9M for P140K, 1.1 x 10-8M for P140K/Y158H or 3.4 x 10-9M for P140K/Y158F), 3.6 x 10-10MO6 -[3H]methylguanine in [3H]methylated DNA substrate and 50 µg of cold calf thymus DNA in a buffer containing 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 5 mM DTT, and 0.5 mM EDTA.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
A library of AGT mutants containing an NNS codon replacing codon 160 in the human AGT was placed in the pUC18 vector and expressed in TRG8 cells that lacked endogenous AGT activity and were permeable to BG (14) . The library was then selected by exposure to MNNG and BG, colonies were isolated, and the AGT sequence present was determined. One of the colonies contained a sequence coding for the double mutation Y158H/G160A. The origin of the second mutation producing the Y158H change is obscure but the mutation was an A:T to G:C transition that could have been derived from the mutagenic effects of the MNNG used for selection. The ability of the cells carrying this mutant AGT to survive the selection procedure suggested that the Y158H/G160A was likely to be active in repairing methylated DNA and to be resistant to BG. This was confirmed by direct measurement of the killing of the cells by MNNG in the presence and absence of BG (Fig. 1)Citation and by assays using crude extracts from the TRG8 cells (Fig. 2)Citation .



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. The effect of mutations Y158H and Y158H/G160A on the survival of MNNG-treated TRG8 cells in the presence and absence of BG. The survival of TRG8 cells expressing the AGT shown after treatment with the MNNG concentration indicated in the presence of 250 µM BG (open symbols) or in the absence of BG (closed symbols) was measured. Results are shown for cells expressing wild-type AGT ({circ}, •), mutant Y158H ({square}, {blacksquare}), and Y158H/G160A ({triangleup}, {blacktriangleup}).

 


View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. The sensitivity of AGT in crude cell extracts to BG. AGT inactivation studies were carried out as described under Methods and Materials by incubation of the crude cell extracts from TRG8 cells expressing the AGT shown with the BG concentrations indicated for 30 min in the presence of 10 µg of calf thymus DNA. The residual AGT activity was then determined by addition of a [3H]methylated DNA substrate and a further incubation for 30 min. There was no significant loss of AGT activity on incubation in the absence of BG.

 
Cells containing the Y158H/G160A mutant or wild-type AGT were resistant to killing by MNNG. When 250 µM BG was also added, the protection by wild-type AGT was abolished, but that by Y158H/G160A was unaffected (Fig. 1)Citation . Direct proof that the Y158H/G160A mutant was resistant to inactivation by BG was obtained using crude extracts from the cells and measuring AGT activity after exposure to the inhibitor (Fig. 2)Citation . The Y158H/G160A mutant was more than 1000 times more resistant to BG than wild type, with an ED50 value of ~180 µM as compared with ~0.1 µM.

Previous studies with the purified protein have shown that the single mutation G160A does not render AGT resistant to BG and, in fact, slightly increases sensitivity to this drug (13) . It, therefore, seemed likely that this mutation was not contributing to the resistance of the Y158H/G160A double mutant, although it might aid in maintaining the activity of the protein when the highly conserved tyrosine-158 was replaced by histidine. To test this, the single Y158H mutant AGT sequence was made and expressed in TRG8 cells. The cells expressing this protein showed similar protection from MNNG to cells expressing wild-type AGT, and this protection was not abolished by BG (Fig. 1)Citation . Also, the Y158H-mutant AGT in crude extracts from the TRG8 cells was actually significantly more resistant to BG inactivation than the double mutant (Fig. 2)Citation .

This resistance was confirmed using AGT purified to homogeneity (Fig. 3Citation and Table 1Citation ). The Y158H mutant AGT was expressed using the pQE vector, which places a (His)6-tagged sequence at the NH2 terminus. The protein was then purified using immobilized metal affinity chromatography. As shown in Fig. 3Citation , the ED50 for inactivation by BG of the Y158H AGT was greatly increased, whereas the Y158F mutation had little significant effect on the reaction with BG. The ED50 value for Y158H was increased by more than 6000-fold over wild-type AGT from 0.1 µM to 620 µM(Table 1)Citation .



View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. The effect of BG on purified AGT proteins. Inactivation studies were carried out as described in the legend to Fig. 2Citation using purified AGT proteins. Results for Y158H and wild type AGT are shown in the main figure. The insert shows results with wild-type and Y158F-mutant AGT proteins.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Properties of AGT mutant proteins

 
Only one other point mutation in AGT is associated with a greater increase in resistance to BG. This is the mutation P140K, which renders the ED50 value more than 1200 µM(14) . Models based on the known crystal structure of the related E. coli Ada-C protein suggested that the side chain of the lysine in the P140K mutant may be in close proximity to the hydroxyl group of tyrosine-158 (Fig. 4)Citation . The presence of a positive charge in this location may, therefore, strongly discourage the binding of the hydrophobic BG.



View larger version (107K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Model of partial structure of P140K and Y158H mutant AGTs. The figures were generated using the program Ras-Mol using the coordinates for the model of human AGT (36) and inserting the point mutations with the Swiss protein data base viewer program. The spatial arrangement of the protein chain at the active site is shown with the side chains of residues 140, 145, and 158 shown as ball and stick structures.

 
This concept was examined by the construction of the double mutants P140K/Y158F and P140K/Y158H. These mutants and P140K were tested for inactivation by BG, and all of them were so highly resistant that ED50 values could not be measured, although Y158F/P140K showed a slight reduction of activity with 1.2 mM BG (Table 1)Citation . Measurement of the rate of guanine production when AGT acts on BG provides a more sensitive method for determining the interaction of AGT with BG (26) . Such studies were, therefore, carried out using [8-3H]BG as a substrate in a 20 min reaction. The production of [8-3H]guanine by the mutants P140K, Y158H and Y158F was consistent with the ED50 values (Table 1)Citation . As reported previously (14) , the formation of [8-3H]guanine was greatly reduced by the P140K mutation. The Y158H mutation was slightly less effective but it also greatly reduced [8-3H]guanine formation, whereas the Y158F mutation had only a small effect (Table 1)Citation . The P140K/Y158F and P140K/Y158H double mutants had a highly impaired ability to convert [8-3H]BG to [8-3H]guanine but P140K/Y158F was actually more reactive than P140K, whereas P140K/Y158H gave no detect-able guanine formation even when 0.6 mg of AGT protein was used (Table 1)Citation .

Although the Y158H and P140K mutations clearly did not prevent the ability of AGT to repair methylated DNA, they did produce a significant effect on the rate of the reaction. As shown in Table 1Citation , there was an approximately 10-fold reduction in the rate constant for DNA repair. These reductions may reflect the distortion at the active site. The combination of the P140K mutation with the Y158H mutation that may produce an even greater distortion reduced the rate constant by a greater amount (40-fold) but the combination P140K/Y158F gave a smaller reduction of only 4-fold. This may indicate that the loss of the hydroxyl group from the side chain of residue 158 may allow the lysine inserted at position 140 to be accommodated with less of an alteration in the structure of the active site.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
It is possible that the G160A alteration in the Y158H/G160A double mutant that was selected in our screening procedure contributes to an increased activity of this mutant compensating for the 10-fold reduction in rate constant produced by the Y158H change. However, this was not investigated in our studies because the Y158H/G160A was not obtained in a purified form suitable for such experiments. Although there was apparently a slight difference in resistance to killing by MNNG between the cells expressing wild-type or Y158H AGT and those expressing the Y158H/G160A double mutant with the latter showing a greater level of protection (Fig. 1)Citation , these results should not be taken to indicate that the double mutant is more active. The observed difference may be an experimental artifact because the cells expressing the double mutant were those surviving the treatment with BG plus MNNG. These cells may have acquired additional mutations in the bacterial genome during the selection procedure, and they grew more slowly than the original untreated TRG8 cells in which the wild type and the Y158H mutants were expressed. This difference in growth rate or other effects of unknown mutations could contribute to the difference observed.

Our results show that, although the position in all of the alkyltransferases equivalent to 158 in the human AGT is highly conserved in all of the known AGTs and is restricted to tyrosine or occasionally phenylalanine, the substitution with histidine also gives rise to an active protein. It is possible that these amino acids are the only ones tolerated at this position because mutant Y158A was inactive (27) , and no AGTs with other alterations at position 158 have been found in screens of mutated AGT libraries. The ability of histidine to replace tyrosine-158 and to provide an active AGT is also suggested by recent results of the screening using BG and MNNG for the selection of plasmid libraries in which random mutagenesis was used for substitutions of positions 150–172 of AGT (16) . All of the BG-resistant mutants found had multiple substitutions with 3–5 amino acids differing from wild type, but 5 of 8 of these mutants had the Y158H change. Our results suggest that this alteration was the major reason for the resistance of these mutants to BG.

Several microbial AGTs including the Ada-C protein from E. coli are virtually unaffected by BG (9) . Studies by site-directed mutagenesis and comparison with the known crystal structure for this protein (30 , 31) have indicated that the resistance of the E. coli Ada-C AGT is due to a steric restriction of the size at the active site that prevents the binding of the bulky BG (32 , 33) . This restriction is caused by the combination of the absence of a proline and the presence of a tryptophan residue in the active site pocket. The mutation of both of these residues to form proline and alanine, respectively, renders Ada-C able to react with BG (32 , 33) .

The inability of the first reported BG-resistant mutants of the human AGT (P140A and G156A) to react well with this drug also seems to be due to steric factors inasmuch as these alterations would be expected to reduce the size of the active site pocket in the human AGT (11 , 12) . However, the discovery that the G160R mutant was also resistant, whereas G160A and G160W were not (and were actually more sensitive), suggested that another class of resistant mutants might be formed by the presence of a hydrophilic group in the active site pocket (13) .

The finding that the Y158H-mutant AGT is highly resistant to inactivation by BG (ED50 of 620 µM) provides strong support for this hypothesis. Its resistance can be explained by the presence of a charged residue in the active-site pocket that discourages the binding of the hydrophobic BG. The other two single amino acid changes that have the largest effect in rendering AGT resistant to BG are P140K (ED50 of > 1200 µM) and P140R (ED50 of 190 µM; Ref. 14 ). These changes are also likely to lead to placing a charged residue in the active site and may also influence the reaction by the steric effect caused by replacing the proline described above.

The combination of the P140K and Y158H mutations forming mutant P140K/Y158H rendered human AGT totally unable to react with BG. The limit of detection in the assays shown in Table 1Citation is such that the reduction in rate of reaction of this double mutant when compared with wild type is by a factor of more than 105. This P140K/Y158H mutant was considerably less active with BG than the single P140K mutant. Although a small part of this reduction may be due to the difference in rate constant between these two mutants, this was altered by only a factor of 3.6, whereas the reduction in the rate of guanine formation from BG was more than 20-fold (Table 1)Citation . In contrast, the increased ability of the P140K/Y158F to react with BG when compared with P140K alone may be due solely to the alteration in the rate constant.

Although both the P140K- and the Y158H-mutated AGT proteins have a significant reduction in the rate constant for the repair of methylated DNA, this does not prevent them from being highly effective in protecting E. coli from killing by MNNG (Fig. 1Citation and reference (14) ) or, in the case of P140K, from protecting mammalian cells from the therapeutic agent BCNU (34) . This is probably due to the very rapid rate of repair by the wild-type AGT. A moderate reduction in this rate, therefore, has little physiological effect. In studies with other mutants of AGT in the DNA binding domain that are more severely compromised in their activity, a greater than 35-fold reduction was required before any effect was observed. Even mutant Y114A, which had almost a 1000-fold reduction in rate constant, provided some protection (29) .

The protection from killing by alkylating agents afforded by mutants Y158H and P140K was not reduced by BG even at concentrations far in excess of those likely to be achievable in patients treated with this drug. Therefore, these mutants are excellent choices for gene therapy approaches in which the expression of a BG-resistant mutant AGT in hematopoietic progenitor cells is used to protect the bone marrow and improve the therapeutic index of such therapy.

Conversely, the relatively facile production of BG-resistant mutants that is revealed in these and other experiments suggests that the formation or selection for such forms of AGT in tumor cells during therapy may be a significant problem although these forms have lower-than-wild-type-AGT activity. This focuses attention on the development of novel inhibitors that could be used to inactivate such forms. The use of short single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides containing an O6-benzyldeoxyguanosine may be useful in this regard because the binding of these to the AGT-active site involves the DNA binding domain and is much stronger than the binding of the free base BG (35) .


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank L. Wiest for excellent technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported in part by National Cancer Institute Grants CA-71976, CA-57725, and CA-18137. J. Leitao was the recipient of fellowships for mobility granted by Foundation Calouste Gulbenkian and Luso-American Development Foundation. Back

2 Present address: Unidade de Ciencias e Tecnologias Agrarias, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambias, 8000 Faro, Portugal. Back

3 To whom requests for reprint should be addressed at Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, 500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033. Phone: (717) 531-8152; Fax: (717) 531-5157; E-mail: aep1{at}psu.edu Back

4 The abbreviations used are: AGT, O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase; BG, O6-benzylguanine; ED50, concentration of BG needed to reduce the alkyltransferase activity by 50% in a 30 min incubation at 37°C; MNNG, N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine; BCNU, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea; LB, Luria-Bertani medium. Back

Received 9/24/98. Accepted 2/ 2/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Samson L. The suicidal DNA repair methyltransferases of microbes. Mol. Microbiol., 6: 825-831, 1992.[Medline]
  2. Pegg A. E., Byers T. L. Repair of DNA containing O6-alkylguanine. FASEB J., 6: 2302-2310, 1992.[Abstract]
  3. Pegg A. E., Dolan M. E., Moschel R. C. Structure, function and inhibition of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 51: 167-223, 1995.[Medline]
  4. Mitra S., Kaina B. Regulation of repair of alkylation damage in mammalian genomes. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 44: 109-142, 1993.[Medline]
  5. Gerson S. L., Liu L., Phillips W. P., Zaidi N. H., Heist A., Markowitz S., Wilson J. K. V. Drug resistance mediated by DNA repair: the paradigm of O6-alkylguanine DNA alkyltransferase. Proc. Am. Assn. Cancer Res., 35: 699-700, 1994.
  6. Dolan M. E. Inhibition of DNA repair as a means of increasing the antitumor activity of DNA reactive agents. Adv. Drug Delivery Reviews, 26: 105-118, 1997.[Medline]
  7. Dolan M. E., Pegg A. E. O6-Benzylguanine and its role in chemotherapy. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 837-847, 1997.[Abstract]
  8. Dolan M. E., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E. Depletion of mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity by O6-benzylguanine provides a means to evaluate the role of this protein in protection against carcinogenic and therapeutic alkylating agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 5368-5372, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Pegg A. E., Boosalis M., Samson L., Moschel R. C., Byers T. L., Swenn K., Dolan M. E. Mechanism of inactivation of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase by O6-benzylguanine. Biochemistry, 32: 11998-12006, 1993.[Medline]
  10. Friedman H. S., Kokkinakis D. M., Pluda J., Friedman A. H., Cokgor I., Haglund M. M., Ashley D. M., Rich J., Dolan M. E., Pegg A. E., Moschel R. C., McLendon R. E., Kerby T., Herndon J. E., Bigner D. D., Schold S. C., Jr. Phase 1 trial of O6-benzylguanine for patients undergoing surgery for malignant glioma. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3570-3575, 1999.[Abstract]
  11. Crone T. M., Pegg A. E. A single amino acid change in human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase decreasing sensitivity to inactivation by O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 53: 4750-4753, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Crone T. M., Goodtzova K., Edara S., Pegg A. E. Mutations in O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase imparting resistance to O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 54: 6221-6227, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Edara S., Kanugula S., Goodtzova K., Pegg A. E. Resistance of the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase containing arginine at codon 160 to inactivation by O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 56: 5571-5575, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Xu-Welliver M., Kanugula S., Pegg A. E. Isolation of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase mutants highly resistant to inactivation by O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 59: 1936-1945, 1998.
  15. Christians F. C., Dawson B. J., Coates M. M., Loeb L. A. Creation of human alkyltransferases resistant to O6-benzylguanine. Cancer Res., 57: 2007-2012, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Encell L. P., Coates M. M., Loeb L. A. Engineering human DNA alkyltransferases for gene therapy using random sequence mutagenesis. Cancer Res., 58: 1013-1020, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Gerson S. L., Phillips W., Kastan M., Dumenco L. L., Donovan C. Human CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors have low, cytokine-unresponsive O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase and are sensitive to O6-benzylguanine plus BCNU. Blood, 5: 1649-1655, 1996.
  18. Maze R., Kapur R., Kelley M. R., Hansen W. K., Oh S. Y., Williams D. A. Reversal of 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea-induced severe immunodeficiency by transduction of murine long-lived hemopoietic progenitor cells using O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase complementary DNA. J. Immunol., 158: 1006-1013, 1997.[Abstract]
  19. Davis B. M., Reese J. S., Koc O. N., Lee K., Schupp J. E., Gerson S. L. Selection for G156A O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene-transduced hematopoietic progenitors and protection from lethality in mice treated with O6-benzylguanine and 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Cancer Res., 57: 5093-5099, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Reese J. S., Koc O. N., Lee K. M., Liu L., Allay J. A., Phillips J. W. P., Gerson S. L. Retroviral transduction of a mutant methylguanine DNA methyltransferase gene into human CD34 cells confers resistance to O6-benzylguanine plus 1,3-bis(chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 14088-14093, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Hickson I., Fairbairn L. J., Chinnasamy N., Lashford L. S., Thatcher N., Margison G. P., Dexter T. M., Rafferty J. A. Chemopreventive gene transfer I: transduction of human haemopoietic progenitors with O6-benzylguanine-resistant O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase attenuates the toxic effects of O6-alkylating agents in vitro. Gene Ther., 5: 835-841, 1998.[Medline]
  22. Chinnasamy N., Rafferty J. A., Hickson I., Lashford L. S., Longhurst S. J., Thatcher N., Margison G. P., Dexter T. M., Fairbairn L. J. Chemopreventive gene transfer II: multilineage in vivo protection of haemopoiesis against the effects of an antitumour agent by expression of a mutant human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Gene Ther., 5: 842-847, 1998.[Medline]
  23. Imai Y., Oda H., Nakatsuru Y., Ishikawa T. A polymorphism at codon 160 of human O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase gene in young patients with adult type cancers and functional assay. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 2441-2445, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Rafferty J. A., Wibley J. E. A., Speers P., Hickson I., Margison G. P., Moody P. C. E., Douglas K. T. The potential role of glycine-160 of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase in reaction with O6-benzylguanine as determined by site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling comparisons. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1342: 90-102, 1997.[Medline]
  25. Rebeck G. W., Samson L. Increased spontaneous mutation and alkylation sensitivity of Escherichia coli strains lacking the ogt O6-methylguanine DNA repair methyltransferase. J. Bacteriol., 173: 2068-2076, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Goodtzova K., Crone T., Pegg A. E. Activation of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase by DNA. Biochemistry, 33: 8385-8390, 1994.[Medline]
  27. Edara S., Goodtzova K., Pegg A. E. The role of tyrosine-158 in O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 1637-1642, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Stanley B. A., Pegg A. E., Holm I. Site of pyruvate formation and processing of mammalian S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase proenzyme. J. Biol. Chem., 264: 21073-21079, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Goodtzova K., Kanugula S., Edara S., Pegg A. E. Investigation of the role of tyrosine-114 in O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. Biochemistry, 37: 12489-12495, 1998.[Medline]
  30. Moody P. C. E., Moore M. E. Crystal structure of E. coli O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase Zeller W. J. D’Incalci M. Newell D. R. eds. . Novel Approaches in Anticancer Drug Design Molecular Modelling—New Treatment Strategies, 49: 16-24, Karger Basel 1995.
  31. Moore M. H., Gulbus J. M., Dodson E. J., Demple B., Moody P. C. E. Crystal structure of a suicidal DNA repair protein: the Ada O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase from E. coli. EMBO J., 13: 1495-1501, 1994.[Medline]
  32. Crone T. M., Kanugula S., Pegg A. E. Mutations in the Ada O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase conferring sensitivity to inactivation by O6-benzylguanine and 2,4-diamino-6-benzyloxy-5-nitrosopyrimidine. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 1687-1692, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Goodtzova K., Kanugula S., Edara S., Pauly G. T., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E. Repair of O6-benzylguanine by the Escherichia coli Ada and Ogt and the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 8332-8339, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Loktionova, N. A., Xu-Welliver, M., Crone, T., Kanugula, S., and Pegg, A. E. Mutant forms of O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase protect CHO cells from killing by BCNU plus O6-benzylguanine or O6-8-oxo-benzylguanine. Biochem. Pharmacol., in press, 1999.
  35. Pegg A. E., Kanugula S., Edara S., Pauly G. T., Moschel R. C., Goodtzova K. Reaction of O6-benzylguanine-resistant mutants of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase with O6-benzylguanine in oligodeoxyribonucleotides. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 10863-10867, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Wibley J. E. A., McKie J. H., Embrey K., Marks D. S., Douglas K. T., Moore M. H., Moody P. C. E. A homology model of the three-dimensional structure of human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase based on the crystal structure of the C-terminal domain of the Ada protein from Escherichia coli. Anticancer Drug Design, 10: 75-95, 1995.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Liu, M. Xu-Welliver, S. Kanugula, and A. E. Pegg
Inactivation and Degradation of O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase after Reaction with Nitric Oxide
Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(11): 3037 - 3043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. S. Srivenugopal, J. Shou, S. R. S. Mullapudi, F. F. Lang Jr., J. S. Rao, and F. Ali-Osman
Enforced Expression of Wild-Type p53 Curtails the Transcription of the O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Gene in Human Tumor Cells and Enhances Their Sensitivity to Alkylating Agents
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2001; 7(5): 1398 - 1409.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. M. Davis, L. P. Encell, S. P. Zielske, F. C. Christians, L. Liu, S. E. Friebert, L. A. Loeb, and S. L. Gerson
Applied molecular evolution of O6-benzylguanine-resistant DNA alkyltransferases in human hematopoietic cells
PNAS, April 5, 2001; (2001) 91601198.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. E. Pegg, K. Goodtzova, N. A. Loktionova, S. Kanugula, G. T. Pauly, and R. C. Moschel
Inactivation of Human O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase by Modified Oligodeoxyribonucleotides Containing O6-Benzylguanine
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., March 1, 2001; 296(3): 958 - 965.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
S. D'Atri, G. Graziani, P. M. Lacal, V. Nisticò, S. Gilberti, I. Faraoni, A. J. Watson, E. Bonmassar, and G. P. Margison
Attenuation of O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Activity and mRNA Levels by Cisplatin and Temozolomide in Jurkat Cells
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., August 1, 2000; 294(2): 664 - 671.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. E. A. Wibley, A. E. Pegg, and P. C. E. Moody
Crystal structure of the human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase
Nucleic Acids Res., January 15, 2000; 28(2): 393 - 401.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. S. Srivenugopal, S. R. S. Mullapudi, J. Shou, T. K. Hazra, and F. Ali-Osman
Protein Phosphorylation Is a Regulatory Mechanism for O6-Alkylguanine-DNA Alkyltransferase in Human Brain Tumor Cells
Cancer Res., January 1, 2000; 60(2): 282 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. M. Davis, L. P. Encell, S. P. Zielske, F. C. Christians, L. Liu, S. E. Friebert, L. A. Loeb, and S. L. Gerson
Applied molecular evolution of O6-benzylguanine-resistant DNA alkyltransferases in human hematopoietic cells
PNAS, April 24, 2001; 98(9): 4950 - 4954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Xu-Welliver, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Xu-Welliver, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pegg, A. E.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online