This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Simpson, D. J. Articles by Farrell, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simpson, D. J. Articles by Farrell, W. E.

Chromosome 13q Deletion Mapping in Pituitary Tumors

Infrequent Loss of the Retinoblastoma Susceptibility Gene (RB1) Locus Despite Loss of RB1 Protein Product in Somatotrophinomas¹

Centre for Cell and Molecular Medicine, School of Postgraduate Medicine, Keele University, North Staffordshire Hospital, Stoke-on Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom [D. J. S., J. M., J. E. B., R. N. C., W. E. F.]; Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, University of Michigan Medical Centre, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109 [A. L. B.]; and University Department of Pathology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow G4 OSF, United Kingdom [A. M. M., W. E. F.]

	ABSTRACT

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Two recent studies have described allelic loss of an RB1 intragenic marker on chromosome 13q in aggressive and metastatic pituitary tumors that did not correlate with loss of pRB. The second report also showed that losses were more frequently associated with a more centromeric marker. Because both of these studies suggest the presence of another or other tumor suppressor genes (TSGs) on 13q, we carried out an allelotype analysis encompassing known and recently described TSG loci on 13q, together with immunohistochemical analysis of pRB.

We analyzed 82 nonfunctional tumors and 53 somatotrophinomas subdivided into invasive and noninvasive cohorts. A significantly higher frequency of loss, at one or more of 13 markers, was evident in the invasive nonfunctional tumors (54%, 26 of 48) than in their noninvasive counterparts (29%, 10 of 34). An approximately equal frequency of loss was apparent in invasive (28%, 5 of 18) and noninvasive (31%, 11 of 35) somatotrophinomas at one or more markers. In those tumors harboring deletion, loss at two or more markers was more frequent in invasive nonfunctional tumors 65% (17 of 26) compared with 36% (4 of 11) of their noninvasive counterparts. In somatotrophinomas, 40% (2 of 5) of invasive tumors as compared with 64% (7 of 11) of noninvasive tumors had evidence of two or more deletions. In tumors showing loss at two or more loci, the majority showed large deletions; however, loss of the RB1 intragenic marker D13S153 was infrequent. In most cases, loss at individual markers was more frequent in invasive tumors than their noninvasive counterparts. A marker 3 cM telomeric to RB1 (D13S1319) showed the highest frequency of deletion in both invasive cohorts (29% of somatotrophinomas and 24% of nonfunctional tumors).

Immunohistochemical analysis of pRB showed frequent loss in somatotrophinomas (27%, 9 of 33) in comparison with 4% (2 of 53) of nonfunctional tumors. Although loss of pRB did not correlate with loss of an intragenic marker or tumor grade, it was significantly associated with the somatotrophinoma subtype (P = 0.002). These data suggest that chromosome 13q is a frequent target for allelic deletion in pituitary tumors and point to another or other TSG loci in these regions.

	INTRODUCTION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Human pituitary tumors are predominantly monoclonal in origin (1 , 2) , and the majority of these tumors will remain benign; however, a proportion will develop invasive behavior. Although human endocrine tumors are thought to arise from the progressive accumulation of genetic alterations in both oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (3, 4, 5) , a proposal analogous to that demonstrated for colorectal cancer (6) , these changes are not clearly defined.

Mice heterozygous for an RB1 mutation do not develop retinoblastomas but have a near complete predisposition to pituitary tumor development (7 , 8) . Although these are of neurointermediate lobe derivation, they nevertheless prompted studies of the RB1 locus in human pituitary tumors. Early studies using intragenic markers to RB1 suggested that this was not a frequent target of loss in pituitary tumorigenesis (9, 10, 11) . However, two recent reports (12 , 13) have described losses on chromosome 13q in invasive pituitary adenomas, carcinomas, and their metastases in comparison to their noninvasive counterparts. Although both reports describe loss of RB1 intragenic markers, Bates et al. (13) found that losses were more frequently associated with a microsatellite marker 2 cM centromeric to RB1 and that a proportion of tumors failed to express pRB. However, both studies demonstrated lack of correlation between LOH³ at an RB1 intragenic marker and loss of pRB, suggesting the presence of another TSG on chromosome 13q. Similar conclusions have been reached in other common cancers including head and neck (14) , breast (15) , ovarian (16 , 17) , and prostate tumors (18) . More recent reports have described other TSGs on 13q including BRCA2 (19) and other putative TSG loci telomeric to RB1 in hematological malignancies, termed DBM (20, 21, 22) and centromeric to RB1 in breast cancer termed BRUSH1 (23) .

To further define the role of chromosome 13q and RB1 in pituitary tumorigenesis, we have carried out an allelotype analysis of 135 sporadic human pituitary tumors (53 somatotrophinomas and 82 nonfunctional) using a panel of 13 microsatellite markers encompassing known and putative TSG loci together with IHC analysis of pRB. On radiological criteria, these tumors were subdivided into noninvasive and invasive tumor cohorts (13) . The study shows that chromosome 13q is a frequent target for deletion, irrespective of tumor subtype (nonfunctional and somatotrophinoma) or clinical behavior; however, loss of an intragenic marker to RB1 was infrequent. Loss of pRB expression as assessed by immunohistochemical analysis was not associated with LOH at an RB1 intragenic marker or tumor grade; however, we show an association with the somatotrophinoma subtype.

	MATERIALS AND METHODS

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Patient Material.
Eighty-two sporadic, clinically nonfunctional pituitary tumors and 53 somatotrophinomas with matched blood samples were obtained from patients who had undergone hypophysectomy. Within the nonfunctional cohort, 57 tumors have been reported previously for chromosome 9p deletion analysis (24) . Tumor tissues were collected retrospectively following standard immunohistochemical assessment. Tumors were defined as noninvasive or invasive and graded according to criteria based on a modified Hardy classification (25) as described previously (13) . Grade 1 tumors were microadenomas (<1-cm diameter) and grade 2 tumors consisted of enclosed macroadenomas (>1-cm diameter) with or without suprasellar extension. Both grade 1 and grade 2 tumors were defined as noninvasive. Grade 3 tumors were locally invasive with evidence of bony destruction and tumor within the sphenoid and/or cavernous sinus. Grade 4 tumors demonstrate central nervous system/extracranial spread with or without metastases. Grade 3 and grade 4 tumors were considered to be invasive. Using these criteria, 35 somatotrophinomas were classified as noninvasive (comprising 11 grade 1 tumors and 24 grade 2 tumors) and 18 as invasive (16 grade 3 tumors and 2 grade 4 tumors). Similarly, 34 nonfunctional tumors were classified as noninvasive (2 grade 1 tumors and 32 grade 2 tumors) and 48 tumors as invasive (44 grade 3 tumors and 4 grade 4 tumors).

In addition, 15 histologically normal postmortem pituitary and matched spleen samples were obtained, within 12 h of death, and stored at -70°C. Normal pituitary tissues were formalin fixed, paraffin embedded, and confirmed normal by routine microscopy prior to DNA extraction.

Tissue and DNA Preparation.
Prior to DNA extraction from archival specimens, a single 5-µm section was subjected to H&E staining, allowing tumor identification and microdissection from subsequent slides, therefore providing a microscopically homogeneous sample with minimal nonneoplastic cell contamination. DNA was extracted as described previously (13 , 24) .

LOH Analysis.
Oligonucleotide sequences to 13 highly polymorphic microsatellite markers spanning chromosome 13q in the following linkage order: D13S1250, D13S1246, D13S260, D13S219, D13S1253, D13S263, D13S168, D13S155, D13S1325, D13S153, D13S272, D13S1319, and D13S176 (Fig. 1) were obtained from the Genome Database. The marker D13S153 lies in intron 2 of the RB1 gene (26) , and the marker D13S260 maps to the TSG BRCA2 (20) . The recently described TSG DBM lies 1.6 cM telomeric to RB1 (22) ; we used the microsatellite marker D13S272 (22 , 27 , 28) to assess LOH status at this locus. LOH status at the recently described BRUSH1 locus was assessed with the microsatellite marker D13S219 as described (23) . The total tumor cohort (82 nonfunctional and 53 somatotrophinomas), together with matched blood DNA, were PCR amplified for these microsatellite markers as described previously (13 , 24) . Products were run on 8% nondenaturing polyacrylamide gels, fixed and visualized by silver staining as described previously (13 , 24) .

View larger version (48K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 1. Deletion mapping of somatotrophinoma and nonfunctional tumors. LOH was analyzed using 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers to chromosome 13q. Deletion status of somatotrophinomas (a) and non-functional tumors (b) are shown. The relative positions and linkage order of each microsatellite marker are shown on the left of both figures, together with the approximate map positions of the TSGs RB1, BRCA2, DBM, and BRUSH1. Tumors are subdivided into invasive and noninvasive. To aid interpretation, tumors showing a single loss are shown to the left of those showing more than one loss. The frequency (%) LOH at each of the markers is shown to the right of each of the loss patterns for invasive and noninvasive somatotrophinomas and nonfunctional pituitary tumors. The asterisk shows markers demonstrating significantly increased frequency of LOH in invasive tumors compared with noninvasive counterparts, where * denotes P = <0.05 and ** denotes P = <0.01 (Fisher’s Exact test). The figure also shows the IHC staining status for those tumors sustaining LOH on 13q. Staining status for tumors without LOH on this chromosome are not shown (see "Results").

pRB Immunohistochemistry.
Archival sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and microwaved in a citrate buffer (pH 6.0) for 25 min on full power in a 600-W microwave oven. Sections were then stained using a labeled strepavidin-biotin system, with a primary mouse monoclonal antibody NCL-RB1 (Novacastra Labs, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, UK) as described previously (13) . The primary antibody, that recognizes an epitope of pRB located between amino acids 300 and 380, was used at a dilution of 1:25. The secondary antibody was biotinylated anti-rabbit/mouse immunoglobulins, followed by streptavidin-horseradish peroxidase (Large volume LSAB kit; Dako, Ltd, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), with diaminobenzidine as chromogen. Negative controls were the substitution of pre-immune rabbit serum for the primary antibody and the staining of tissue sections from a proven retinoblastoma. A breast carcinoma was used as a positive control. Tumors were scored positive if all cells were stained or the staining pattern was heterogeneous with a portion of the tumor cells showing nuclear staining. Tumors were scored as pRB negative only if all of the malignant cells showed no pRB nuclear staining in the presence of nuclear staining in surrounding and/or infiltrating normal cells. Tumors were scored without knowledge of subtype or behavior.

	RESULTS

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
Allelic Loss at One or More Microsatellite Markers on Chromosome 13q.
Fifty-three somatotrophinomas (35 noninvasive and 18 invasive) and 82 nonfunctional tumors (34 noninvasive and 48 invasive) were studied for evidence of LOH using 13 polymorphic markers spanning known and putative TSG loci on chromosome 13q (Fig. 1) . The somatotrophinoma cohort (Fig. 1a) showed an approximately equal frequency of loss in invasive (28%, 5 of 18) and noninvasive (31%, 11 of 35) tumors at one or more microsatellite markers. However, in the nonfunctional tumor cohort (Fig. 1b) , there was a significantly higher frequency of loss, at one or more microsatellite markers, in invasive tumors 54% (26 of 48) compared with their noninvasive 29% (10 of 34) counterparts (P = <0.05). Representative examples of LOH at informative microsatellite markers are shown in comparison to matched leukocyte DNA in each case (Fig. 2) .

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Fig. 2. Representative tumors studied for allelic deletion. In each case, tumor (T) and matched blood DNA (B) are shown in adjacent lanes. LOH is highlighted by the arrow. The microsatellite markers are shown below the tumor specimen. The figure also shows two invasive tumors in which the intragenic marker to RB1 (D13S153) is lost (#250) and one (#238) in which the marker is retained. LOH is demonstrated by the absence, or substantially reduced intensity, of one of the expected alleles in tumor DNA when compared with matched leukocyte DNA.

Allelic Loss at the RB1 Intragenic Marker D13S153.
The majority of tumors studied showed retention of the RB1 intragenic marker D13S153. The highest frequency of LOH at D13S153 was apparent in invasive somatotrophinomas (2 of 15; 13%), followed by invasive nonfunctional tumors (3 of 46; 6.5%). Loss of D13S153 was detected in only 2 of 32 (6%) noninvasive somatotrophinomas, and no losses were detected in 33 noninvasive, nonfunctional tumors (Fig. 1) . Of the six pituitary carcinomas available for study, one of five informative tumors (nonfunctional) showed loss of the RB1 intragenic marker.

Frequency of Loss in Invasive and Noninvasive Pituitary Tumors.
Fig. 1 summarizes the frequency of LOH across the 13 microsatellite markers in somatotrophinomas and nonfunctioning tumors. The figures also show multiple regions of allelic deletion distinct from RB1 that are significantly associated with invasive tumors in comparison with their noninvasive counterparts. In the somatotrophinomas, two markers, D13S1319 and D13S176, show a significantly higher frequency of loss in invasive tumors in comparison with their noninvasive counterparts. Similarly, in the nonfunctional tumors, three markers comprising D13S260, D13S155, and D13S1319 show a significantly higher frequency of LOH in invasive tumors compared with their noninvasive counterparts. For the remaining markers, the majority were more frequently lost in invasive tumors in comparison with their noninvasive counterparts; however, this did not reach statistical significance (Fig. 1) . Microsatellite mapping of 15 histologically normal postmortem pituitaries with the 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers used in this study failed to show allelic deletion on chromosome 13q.

pRB Immunohistochemistry.
Thirty-three of 53 somatotrophinomas and 53 of 82 nonfunctional adenomas were evaluable for immunohistochemical analysis of pRB expression. Of the evaluable tumors, 27% (9 of 33) of somatotrophinomas and 4% (2 of 53) of nonfunctional tumors failed to stain for pRB irrespective of LOH status at any of the microsatellite markers used in this study. Loss of pRB was found at approximately equal frequency in invasive (5 of 11) and noninvasive tumors (6 of 11). Fig. 1 summarizes the pRB expression status in tumors showing chromosome 13q deletions. In the total tumor cohort (nonfunctional and somatotrophinomas), seven tumors showed loss at the intragenic RB1 intragenic marker (Fig. 1) ; of these, four were available for staining. In two cases, loss at RB1 was accompanied by an absence of pRB (Fig. 1) . Because so few tumors showed loss of the RB1 intragenic marker and loss of pRB, we were unable to draw any statistical conclusion. However, a significant correlation was found between loss of pRB and the somatotrophinoma subtype (P = 0.002). Ten histologically normal postmortem pituitaries were also examined for pRB and showed nuclear staining in all cases.

	DISCUSSION

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 
In this study, we confirmed and extended recent investigations that define a role for chromosome 13q aberrations in pituitary tumors (12 , 13) . Using a panel of highly polymorphic markers to chromosome 13q, our analysis showed that the nonfunctional and somatotrophinoma tumor cohorts show LOH at one or more markers, irrespective of clinical behavior. However, in nonfunctional tumors, the frequency of loss (at one or more markers) was significantly higher in invasive (54%) than in their noninvasive counterparts (29%), whereas an approximately equal overall frequency of loss was apparent in somatotrophinomas (28% versus 31%, respectively). In those tumors that had sustained deletion, loss at two or more loci was more frequent in invasive nonfunctional tumors (65%) than their noninvasive counterparts (36%).

Previous studies by our own group and others (13 , 29, 30, 31) have shown that multiple allelic deletions (in this case, on two or more chromosomes) are associated with increasingly invasive behavior. For the somatotrophinoma cohort, the reverse was true in that 64% of noninvasive tumors compared with 40% of invasive tumors had evidence of two or more deletions on chromosome 13q. The difference may reflect a subtype-specific phenomenon; however, it does not exclude the possibility of an increase in the frequency of losses involving other chromosomes segregating with invasive somatotrophinomas. In this context, we recently reported an approximately equal frequency of loss (31%) on chromosome 9p in invasive and noninvasive nonfunctional pituitary tumors (24) , leading us to suggest that chromosome 9p is an early target in pituitary tumorigenesis. Subsequent studies have shown losses on this chromosome to be an infrequent event in somatotrophinomas (32) . Taken together, these findings further support the concept of subtype-specific genetic aberrations. Noninvasive tumors, irrespective of subtype, showed highly infrequent loss of an RB1 intragenic marker, confirming our previous findings (13) . However, earlier studies appeared to discount a role for RB1 deletion in noninvasive tumors (9, 10, 11, 12) . The low frequency of loss found in this and our previous study (13) most likely reflects the larger number of tumors investigated. Loss of an RB1 intragenic marker was found at a higher frequency in invasive tumors, regardless of tumor subtype in comparison with their noninvasive counterparts. These findings are in agreement with our earlier studies (13) ; however, they are somewhat at variance with a recent study by Pei et al. (12) , who reported loss of RB1 in all of 13 highly invasive or malignant pituitary tumors. Although both studies used intragenic markers, the size of the gene (>200 kb) cannot exclude microdeletions as a mechanism accounting for these different findings or perhaps reflect the different tumor subtypes studied. Interestingly, Pei et al. (12) showed in two of their tumors an intact RB1 allele at initial surgery and loss at a subsequent operation. Thus, loss of RB1 may more accurately reflect tumors destined for recurrence or a predilection toward particularly aggressive behavior.

Because TSGs may be inactivated by a variety of genetic or epigenetic mechanisms, we determined IHC expression of pRB irrespective of chromosome 13q LOH status. Loss of pRB was detected at a significantly higher frequency in somatotrophinomas (27%, P = 0.002) than in nonfunctional tumors (4%). Although two earlier studies (12 , 33) have failed to detect loss of pRB in pituitary tumors, neither study included somatotrophinomas, suggesting to us that this may indeed represent a subtype-specific phenomenon. Indeed, our studies of the TSG p16 have shown that methylation and loss of protein to be significantly associated with nonfunctional tumors but not somatotrophinomas (32) . The loss of pRB and retention of p16 in somatotrophinomas may well represent mutually exclusive phenomena that are also apparent in several other tumor types. The lack of any clear association between allelic loss at RB1 and absent pRB in these and earlier studies further supports the suggestion of another or other TSGs in this region (12 , 13) . In addition to pituitary tumors, a lack of concordance between loss of RB1 and absent pRB in several different tumor types has led to a similar conclusion (14 , 15 , 17 , 18 , 20 , 23) and in some cases identified novel regions of deletion and candidate TSG loci. Although the mechanism responsible for loss of pRB in our tumor cohorts remains to be determined, two other recent studies have described loss of pRB in pituitary tumors. The first report (34) showed that 2 of 28 adenomas had undetectable pRB, and in a subsequent study (35) of an adrenocorticotropic hormone-secreting tumor, the benign adenoma showed strong immunoreactivity for pRB, whereas an adjacent sellar carcinoma and its metastases were pRB negative.

In general, in those tumors showing loss at two or more markers, deletions were large, frequently involving juxtaposed markers. In our own previous study, we also found, that some tumors had evidence of codeletion involving RB1 and a more centromeric marker (D13S155). Pei et al. (12) also reported codeletion of RB1, in this case, with a marker either centromeric or telomeric to this locus in 2 of 13 tumors studied. Although the size of the deletions and the overall pattern of loss do not readily allow us to draw firm conclusions regarding a specific target(s), several regions are worthy of note. In particular, a region 3 cM telomeric to RB1 (D13S1319) was the most frequently lost locus in invasive tumors, regardless of subtype. In contrast, a closely spaced marker, 2 cM telomeric to RB1 (D13S272) and linked to the putative TSG termed DBM (20, 21, 22) was lost at low frequency (in this case, a low frequency was arbitrarily defined as 15% or less). An additional region extending from the marker D13S1250 to D13S253 showed frequent deletion, principally in invasive nonfunctional tumors. This region, centromeric to RB1, harbors the characterized TSG BRCA2 (19) and the recently described putative TSG BRUSH1 (23) . Because the markers used in this study are closely linked to these genes, more detailed investigations may define a role for these genes in pituitary tumorigenesis.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ Financial support provided by the West Midlands Regional Health Authority and the Association for International Cancer Research. D.J.S. is a recipient of a West Midlands New Blood Fellowship, and their support is gratefully acknowledged.

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Medicine, Keele University, Thornburrow Drive, Hartshill Stoke-on-Trent ST4 7QB, United Kingdom. Phone: (44) 1782 555225; Fax: (44) 1782 747 319; E-mail: w.e.farrell{at}keele.ac.uk

³ The abbreviations used are: LOH, loss of heterozygosity; TSG, tumor suppressor gene; DBM, deleted in B-cell malignancy; IHC, immunohistochemistry.

Received 10/20/98. Accepted 1/28/99.

	REFERENCES

Top ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION MATERIALS AND METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION REFERENCES

 

1. Alexander J. M, Biller B. M. K, Bikkal H, Zervas N. T, Arnold A, Klibanski A. Clinically non-functioning pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin. J. Clin. Invest., 86: 336-340, 1990.
2. Herman V., Fagin J., Gonsky R., Kovaks K., Melmed S. Clonal origin of pituitary adenomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 71: 1427-1433, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Arnold A. Molecular genetics of parathyroid gland neoplasia. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 77: 1108-1112, 1993.[Medline]
4. Thakker R. V. The molecular genetics of the multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome. Clin. Endocrinol., 38: 1-14, 1993.[Medline]
5. Melmed S. Pituitary neoplasia Gagel R. F. eds. . Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia, . Endocrinol. Metab. Clin. North Am., 23: 81-92, 1994.
6. Fearon E. R., Volgestein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell, 61: 759-767, 1990.[Medline]
7. Jacks T., Fazeli A., Scmitt E. M., Bronson R. T., Goodell M. A., Weinberg R. A. Effects of an RB mutation in the mouse. Nature (Lond.), 359: 295-300, 1992.[Medline]
8. Hu N-P., Gutsmaan A., Herbert D. C., Bradley A., Lee W-H., Lee EY-HP. Heterozygous Rb-1^D20/+ mice are predisposed to tumours of the pituitary gland with nearly complete penetrance. Oncogene, 9: 1021-1027, 1994.[Medline]
9. Cryns V. L., Alexander J. M., Klibanski A., Arnold A. The retinoblastoma gene in human pituitary tumours. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 77: 644-646, 1993.[Abstract]
10. Woloschak M., Roberts J. L., Post K. D. Loss of heterozygosity at the retinoblastoma locus in human pituitary tumors. Cancer (Phila.), 74: 693-696, 1994.[Medline]
11. Zhu J., Leon S. P., Beggs A. H., Busque L., Gilliland D. G., Black P. M. Human pituitary adenomas show no loss of heterozygosity at the retinoblastoma gene locus. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 78: 922-927, 1994.[Abstract]
12. Pei L., Melmed S., Scheithauer B., Kovacs K., Benedict W. F., Prager D. Frequent loss of heterozygosity at the retinoblastoma susceptibility gene (RB) locus in aggressive pituitary tumours: evidence for a chromosome 13 tumour suppressor gene other than RB. Cancer Res., 55: 1613-1616, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
13. Bates A. S., Farrell W. E., Bicknell E. J., Talbot A. J., Broome J. C., Perrett C. W., Thakker R. V., Clayton R. N. Allelic deletion in pituitary adenomas reflects aggressive biological activity and has potential value as a prognostic marker. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 82: 818-824, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Yoo G. H., Xu H-J., Brennan J. A., Westra W., Hruban R. H., Kock W., Benedict W. F., Sidransky D. Infrequent inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene despite frequent loss of chromosome 13q in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 54: 4603-4606, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Borg A., Zhang Q. X., Alm P., Olsson H., Selberg G. The retinoblastoma gene in breast cancer: allelic loss is not correlated with loss of gene protein expression. Cancer Res., 52: 2991-2994, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Dodson M. K., Cliby W. A., Xu H-J., Delacy K. A., Hu S-X., Keeney G. L., Li J., Podratz K. C., Jenkins R. B., Benedict W. F. Evidence of functional RB protein in epithelial ovarian carcinomas despite loss of heterozygosity at the RB locus. Cancer Res., 54: 610-613, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
17. Kim T. M., Benedict W. F., Xu H-J., Hu S-X., Gosewehr J., Velicesu M., Yin E., Zheng J., D’Ablaing G., Dubeau L. Loss of heterozygosity on chromosome 13 is common only in biologically more aggressive subtypes of ovarian epithelial tumours and is associated with normal retinoblastoma gene expression. Cancer Res., 54: 605-609, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Cooney K. A., Wetzel J. C., Merajver S. D., Macoska J. A., Singleton T. P., Wojno K. J. Distinct regions of allelic loss on 13q in prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 56: 1142-1145, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Wooster R., Neuhausen S. L., Mangion J., Quirk Y., Ford D., Collins N., Nguyen K., Seal S., Tran T., Averill D., Devilee P., Cornelisse C. J., Menko F. H., Daly P. A., Ponder B. A. J., Skolnick M. H., Easton D. F., Goldgar D. E., Stratton M. R. Localisation of a breast cancer susceptibility gene, BRCA2, to chromosome 13q12–13. Science (Washington DC), 265: 2088-2090, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Brown A. G., Ross F. M., Dunne E. M., Steel M., Weir-Thompson E. M. Evidence for a new tumour suppressor locus (DBM) in human B-cell neoplasia telomeric to the retinoblastoma gene. Nat. Genet., 3: 67-72, 1993.[Medline]
21. Liu Y., Szekely L., Grander D., Soderhall S., Juliusson G., Gahrton G., Linder S., Einhorn S. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells with allelic deletion at 13q14 commonly have one intact RB1 gene: evidence for a role of adjacent loci. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 8696-8701, 1993.
22. Devilder M. C., Francois S., Bosic A., Moreau C., Mellerin M. P., Le Paslier D., Bataille R., Moisan J. P. Deletion cartography around the D13S25 locus in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and accurate mapping of the involved tumour suppressor gene. Cancer Res., 55: 1355-1357, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Schott D. R., Chang J. N., Deng G., Kurisu W., Kuo W. L., Gray J., Smith H. S. A candidate tumour suppressor gene in human breast cancers. Cancer Res., 54: 1393-1396, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Farrell W. E., Simpson D., Bates A. S., Talbot J. A., Bicknell J., Clayton R. N. Chromosome 9p deletions in invasive and non invasive non-functional pituitary adenomas: the deleted region involves markers outside of the MTS1 and MTS2 gene. Cancer Res., 57: 2703-2709, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Hardy J. Transphenoidal microsurgical treatment of pituitary tumours Linfoot J. eds. . Recent Advances in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pituitary Tumours, : 375-388, Raven Press New York 1979.
26. Toguchida J., Mcgee T. L., Paterson J. C., Eagle J. R., Tucker S., Yandell D. W., Dryja T. P. Complete genomic sequence of the human retinoblastoma susceptibility gene. Genomics, 17: 535-543, 1993.[Medline]
27. Chapman R. M., Corcoran M. M., Gardiner A., Hawthorn L. A., Cowell J. K., Oscier D. G. Frequent homozygous deletions of the D13S25 locus in chromosome region 13q14 defines the location of a gene critical in leukaemogenesis in chronic B-cell lymphocytic leukaemia. Oncogene, 9: 1289-1293, 1994.[Medline]
28. Melemed J., Einhorn J. M., Ittmann M. M. Allelic loss on chromosome 13q in human prostate carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1867-1872, 1997.[Abstract]
29. Bystrom C., Larsson C., Blomberg C., Sandelin K., Falkmer E., Skogseid B., et al Localisation of the MEN1 gene to a small region within chromosome 11q13 by deletion mapping in tumours. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 1968-1972, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
30. Thakker R. V., Pook M. A., Wooding C., Boscaro M., Scanarini M., Clayton R. N. Association of somatotrophinomas with loss of alleles on chromosome 11 and with gsp mutations. J. Clin. Invest., 91: 2815-2821, 1993.
31. Boggild M. D., Jenkinson S., Pistorello M., Boscaro M., Scanarini M., Mcternan P., Perrett C. W., Thakker R. V., Clayton R. N. Molecular genetic studies of sporadic pituitary tumours. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 78: 387-392, 1994.[Abstract]
32. Simpson D. J., Bicknell E. J., McNicol A. M., Clayton R. N., Farrell W. E. Hypermethylation of the p1b/CDKN2A/MTS1 gene and loss of protein expression is associated with nonfunctional pituitary adenomas but somatotrophinomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 24: 328-336, 1999.[Medline]
33. Woloschak M., Yu A., Xiao J., Post K. D. Abundance and state of phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma gene product in human pituitary tumours. Int. J. Cancer, 67: 16-19, 1996.[Medline]
34. Lucke M., Hamel W., Ludecke D. K., Herrmann H. D., Westphal M. Expression of retinoblastoma gene in human intracranial neoplasms. Int. J. Oncol., 4: 885-890, 1994.
35. Hinton D. R., Hahn J. A., Weiss M. H., Couldwell W. T. Loss of RB expression in an ACTH-secreting pituitary carcinoma. Cancer Lett., 126: 209-214, 1998.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. A. Fernando and A. P. Heaney {alpha}1-Adrenergic Receptor Antagonists: Novel Therapy for Pituitary Adenomas Mol. Endocrinol., December 1, 2005; 19(12): 3085 - 3096. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Lania, G. Mantovani, and A. Spada Genetics of Pituitary Tumors: Focus on G-Protein Mutations Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2003; 228(9): 1004 - 1017. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. J. Simpson, S. J. Frost, J. E. Bicknell, J. C. Broome, A. M. McNicol, R. N. Clayton, and W. E. Farrell Aberrant expression of G1/S regulators is a frequent event in sporadic pituitary adenomas Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2001; 22(8): 1149 - 1154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. N. Clayton, M. Pfeifer, A. B. Atkinson, P. Belchetz, J. A. H. Wass, E. Kyrodimou, M. Vanderpump, D. Simpson, J. Bicknell, and W. E. Farrell Different Patterns of Allelic Loss (Loss of Heterozygosity) in Recurrent Human Pituitary Tumors Provide Evidence for Multiclonal Origins Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 6(10): 3973 - 3982. [Abstract] [Full Text]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Simpson, D. J. Articles by Farrell, W. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Simpson, D. J. Articles by Farrell, W. E.