| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Immunology |
Medical Department I, Saarland University Medical School, D-66421 Homburg, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-CD3/CD30 and
-CD28/CD30 Bi-mAbs results in the specific activation of xenotransplanted, resting human T cells infiltrating the CD30-positive Hodgkins tumor. Bi-mAb treatment resulted in enhanced expression of cytokines such as interleukin 1ß, interleukin 2, tumor necrosis factor type
, and activation markers including Ki-67, CD25, and CD45RO in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. This antigen-dependent, local T-cell stimulation led to the activation of the cytolytic machinery in T lymphocytes, determined by the up-regulation of mRNA-encoding perforin and the cytotoxic serine-esterases granzymes A and B. The Bi-mAb-induced generation of CTLs depended on the presence of the CD30 antigen and the combined application of both Bi-mAbs. Our findings suggest that the combined application of T-cell-activating Bi-mAbs is able to achieve a tumor site-specific activation of the T-cell cytolytic machinery in vivo. The fact that these cytotoxic cells do not home in tumor-associated antigen-negative tissue and do not enter circulation might explain our previous observations (C. Renner et al., Blood, 87: 29302937, 1996) of a high cure rate in preclinical models even at an advanced stage of disease. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-CD30/CD3 and
-CD30/CD28 Bi-mAb regimen induced an efficient tumor cell lysis in vitro and in vivo (9)
. In a preclinical model, the treatment of SCID mice harboring xenografted disseminated CD30+ tumors resulted in the complete cure of all of the animals. Even if the beginning of treatment was delayed and tumor growth advanced, complete remissions could be achieved (10)
. Our data confirmed previous observations (11)
that only the combination of both CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes resulted in the cure of tumor-bearing SCID mice, which suggested that both subsets are crucial for the efficient eradication of tumor cells (10)
. However, the precise way by which Bi-mAb-activated T cells eliminate tumor cells still has to be elucidated. Early experiments with CTLs stressed the role of cytokines in tumor cell lysis (12) . These results were recently challenged by experimental evidence that the contribution of cytokines to tumor cell lysis is not by direct participation in processes involved in rapid cell destruction (13) ; rather, cytokines are now believed to function primarily by down-regulating the cell-cycle activity of tumor cells and by augmenting the cytolytic activity of effector lymphocytes (14) . The key components in the cytolytic machinery of T cells are represented by perforin and granzymes; as potent cytotoxic molecules they can suppress tumor growth (15) . After attaching at the target cells, perforin monomers assemble to polymeric pore structures, which are inserted into the plasma membrane thus causing osmotic cytolysis and the typical picture of necrosis (16) . Secreted granzymes enter the target cell using the perforin-channel and initiate an internal disintegration pathway that leads to DNA fragmentation (apoptosis) and lysis (17) . In vitro data showed that this granule-exocytosis pathway plays a central role in bispecific-antibody-induced T-cell-mediated tumor destruction (18) . In accordance with the observation that CD8+CD45RO+ cells are the most efficient cytotoxic cells, the up-regulation of expression of perforin and granzymes A and B reached the highest levels in this cell population (19) . To investigate whether these molecular programs of Bi-mAb-induced cytotoxic T cells are also operative in the immune destruction of tumor cells in vivo, we established an experimental tumor model in C.B-17 SCID/SCID mice. Simultaneous growth of either CD30-positive Hodgkins lymphoma and TAA-unrelated colon carcinoma was induced s.c. Our investigations show that human lymphocytes activated by the combination of both Bi-mAbs are found only in Hodgkins lymphoma tissue and to a much lesser extent or not at all in TAA-negative tissue including the unrelated colon carcinoma. This site-specific activation of resting human T lymphocytes led to directed exocytosis of perforin and granzymes, demonstrating that this pathway is a very important mechanism for Bi-mAb-mediated tumor destruction in vivo and the consecutive cure of animals xenografted with disseminated Hodgkins lymphoma, even in advanced stages of disease.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-CD3/CD30 and
-CD28/CD30) have been described previously (9
, 22)
. The established CD30+ human tumor cell line L540CY has been described previously (23)
. The LOVO colon carcinoma-derived line was obtained from American Type Culture Collection. The following moAbs were used for this study: (a) 2H4 (antihuman TNF-
) and B-G-5 (antihuman IL-2; Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany); (b) ß-36 (antihuman IL-1ß) and goat-antimouse-IgG-FITC (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany); (c) Ki-67-FITC (antihuman Ki-67), ACT1-FITC (antihuman CD25), and UCHL-1 (antihuman CD45RO; Dakopatts, Hamburg, Germany); (d) SK7-FITC and SK7-PE (Phycoerythrin, antihuman CD3); and (e) SK3-PE (antihuman CD4), SK1-PE (antihuman CD8; Becton Dickinson, Heidelberg, Germany).
T-Cell Preparations.
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from heparinized blood of healthy donors were isolated and T cells were negatively enriched by magnetic activated cell sorting as described previously (22)
. Contaminating cell fractions were always less than 0.5%.
Tumor Model.
The experimental model based on the solid growth of two different tumors in the same mice: 2 x 107 L540CY cells (suspended in PBS at a volume of 400 µl) expressing the CD30 Hodgkins-associated antigen were applied s.c. in the left ventral thoracic wall. The s.c. injection of the CD30-negative LOVO cell line (1.5 x 107 cells, suspended in PBS at a volume of 400 µl) was given in the right ventrogluteal region of the same animal. Solid tumors were established in 40 SCID mice by this way. Previous experiments had proven a 100% tumor take rate at this cell number. When tumors reached a diameter of 1 cm, bispecific antibodies followed by resting human T lymphocytes were injected into the ventral or dorsal tail vein. There were at least four experimental groups (410 mice per group): (a) CD3+ lymphocytes treatment group (1 x 107 T cells, suspended in PBS at a volume of 300 µl); (b) CD3+ lymphocytes and 100 µg of 2F10-Bi-mAbs (
-CD28/CD30); (c) CD3+ lymphocytes and 100 µg of HT3-Bi-mAbs (
-CD3/CD30); and (d) CD3+ lymphocytes and 50 µg of each Bi-mAb (
-CD3/CD30 and
-CD28/CD30). Seven days after the administration of the Bi-mAbs and effector cells, respectively, the mice were killed by cervical dislocation. The solid tumors, the spleens, and blood were removed for additional investigations.
FACScan Analysis.
Single cell suspensions were obtained by mechanical dissection of different organs. Human lymphocytes (5000) were analyzed in each experiment. For intracellular staining of IL-1ß, IL-2, and TNF-
, cells were permeabilized by 0.5% Saponin (Sigma, Munich, Germany), and FACS analysis was performed according to the method described previously (24
, 25)
. A FITC-conjugated goat-antimouse F(ab') immunoglobulin monomer antibody was used as second-step reagent (Dianova, Hamburg, Germany). For visualizing membrane-bound T-cell activation markers (Ki-67, CD25, CD45RO, CD3, CD4, and CD8) a double-immunofluorescent assay was performed either using two primarily FITC- or PE-conjugated moAbs or using the second-step reagent as described previously (24)
.
RNA Isolation.
Portions of removed tissue were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70°C for RNA extraction. The tissue was homogenized with a tissue tearer. Total RNA was extracted with guanidinium isothiocyanate (26)
and quantified by spectrophotometry.
RT-assisted PCR.
RT-PCR was done as described previously (27)
. In brief, 2 µg of total RNA in a volume of 4 µl were reverse-transcribed in a 20-µl vol. containing 5 µl of Oligo dT18 primer (10 µM, Life Technologies, Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany), 1 µl Superscript RT (Life Technologies, Inc., Karlsruhe, Germany), 2 µl of Dithiothreitol (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany), and 4 µl of 5-fold-reaction buffer (Life Technologies, Inc.). The reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C for 1 h, heated at 70°C (10 min), and stored at 4°C. Amplification of specific cDNA-fragments was performed as described by Nakajima et al. (27)
. The following primer pairs were used:
(a) the perforin PCR product was generated with 5'-GTCACGTCGAAGTACTTGGTG- 3' and 5'-ATGGCTGATAGCCTGTCTCAG- 3';
(b) granzyme A was generated with 5'-CTGTAACTTGAACAAAAGCT- 3' and 5'-CCAGAATCTCCATTGCACGA- 3';
(c) granzyme B was generated with 5'-GCCCACAACATCAAAGAACAG- 3' and 5'-AACCAGCCACATAGCACACAT- 3'; and
(d) ß-actin was generated with 5'-TCTACAATGAGCTGCGTGTGG- 3' and 5'-CATGAGGTAGTCTGTCAGGTC- 3'.
One µl of cDNA from a total of 20 µl was amplified with 1 unit of Goldstar Taq DNA polymerase (Leiden, Netherlands) in a final volume of 50 µl containing 5 µl of nucleosidtriphosphate (2 mM), 3.3 µl of MgCl2 (Merck, Darmstadt, Germ-any), 1.5 of µl of each primer (10 mM), 5 µl of 10x PCR buffer (Leiden, Netherlands) and Aqua dest. PCR amplification was carried out on a thermocycler (MWG-Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) with the following profile: 95°C for 80 s, annealing for 80 s, and extension at 72°C for 2 min. The number of cycles and the annealing temperature depended on the primers used: (a) perforin (57°C, 30 cycles); (b) granzyme A (50°C, 32 cycles); (c) granzyme B (61°C, 30 cycles); and (d) ß-actin (61°C, 30 cycles). Aliquots (20 µl) of each PCR product were separated on a 2.5% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining (Sigma).
Northern Blot Analysis.
Northern blots were performed as described previously (19)
. [32P]CTP-random-labeled (Ready-To-Go Kit, Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany) gene-specific cDNA probes were hybridized in a formamide buffer system (5 ml of formamide, 2.5 ml of 20x SSC, 1 ml of 50x Denhardts solution, 0.5 ml of SDS 20%, 1 ml of double-density H20, and 50 µg/ml heat-denatured salmon sperm) at 42°C for 1016 h. After hybridization, membranes were washed and exposed at -70°C. The perforin and granzymes A- and B-specific cDNAs were generated by PCR as described previously (18)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) and enhance expression of the high-affinity receptor for IL-2 (CD25; Ref. 28
). As demonstrated by FACScan-analysis (Fig. 1)
when compared with all of the other treatment-groups. Cross-reactivity of the anti-IL-2-moAb between murine and human IL-2 was excluded by using double immunofluorescence. The high expression level of the CD25 antigen on TILs after combined Bi-mAb treatment confirmed their activation status.
|
Up-regulation of Perforin and Granzyme Message in Bi-mAb-activated T Cells in Vivo.
As perforin and the granzyme family seem to be the most important mediators involved in target cell lysis, we looked for the up-regulation of these molecules in Bi-mAb-activated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes by Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis. Perforin and granzyme A and B mRNA were expressed only in Hodgkins lymphoma of SCID-mice treated with the Bi-mAb combination regimen (Fig. 2
, animal 1, Lane 2) and was not detectable by Northern blot in the CD30-negative colon carcinoma (Lane 1) nor in the spleen (Lane 3) or blood (Lane 4). There was no induction of these cytocidal proteins in animals treated with one Bi-mAb alone because detection of granzyme and perforin gene expression failed. Missing of cytotoxic activity after inappropriate treatment is represented by animal 2 (Fig. 2)
, which was treated with anti-CD3/CD30 Bi-mAb only. The differential pattern of mRNA expression for perforin and granzymes A and B appeared to be a consequence of the treatment regimen used because the expression of ß-actin gene was similar in all of the tissues resected from different experimental groups.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and the expression values for CD25 and Ki-67 were manifoldly higher in lymphocytes infiltrating Hodgkins lymphoma than in colon tumor tissue. Moreover, we showed that the majority of activated T cells remained in the CD30+ tissue and did not enter the circulation. Efficient stimulation of CD3+ lymphocytes was induced only after injection of both CD3/CD30 and CD28/CD30 Bi-mAbs. The crucial role of the second signal for efficient T-cell activation in vivo has been emphasized recently by clinical data. Patients with B-cell lymphoma treated with one anti-CD3/CD19 Bi-mAb alone had only slightly enhanced levels of cytokines with no significant T-cell enrichment in tumor tissue could be observed (30)
. However, the addition of IL-2 as second signal initiated efficient T cell activation proven by the increased expression of CD25 and the high levels of cytotoxic granules in tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (31)
. Analyzing the subsets of T cells infiltrating Hodgkins lymphoma showed the highest levels for the CD8+CD45RO+ pool. The phenomenon that memory CD8+ T-cells are in vitro much more potent effector cells than naive CD8+ T cells was first described by Azuma et al. for CTL clones (32) and could be confirmed by our group for Bi-mAb-mediated cytotoxicity (22) . Moreover, Demanet et al. (4) demonstrated in an in vivo murine lymphoma model that unprimed mice did not reject tumors efficiently despite the fact that two T-cell activating antibodies were used. However, if animals were primed before treatment with allogeneic EL 4 lymphoma cells, a rapid expansion of T cells expressing the CD45RO memory antigen could be detected leading to a high remission rate after subsequent tumor challenge and treatment with two Bi-mAbs, one recognizing the CD3 antigen and the other one the CD28 antigen on T cells. Therefore, memory T cells seem to have a crucial impact on tumor cell elimination. In our model, the combined application of Bi-mAbs initiating the primary and the costimulatory signal at the tumor site ensured the TAA-dependent expansion of cytotoxic T cells expressing the memory phenotype.
We could prove in our in vitro studies that Bi-mAb-activated lymphocytes secreted enhanced levels of cytokines but that the tumor eradication was dependent mainly on the release of perforin and granzymes. This granule-exocytosis pathway seems to play a critical role in the present in vivo SCID mouse model, too. Only SCID mice treated with a combination of both Bi-mAbs had up-regulated mRNA expression of perforin and granzymes in the tumor tissue. The expression pattern was strictly CD30-antigen dependent. These data support former results of several studies investigating tumor cell lysis by effector cells. Mice lacking the perforin gene provided clear evidence that pore formation by perforin is the main mechanism of cytotoxicity mediated by CTLs and natural killer cells and is crucial for tumor destruction in vivo (33 , 34) . An approach similar to the one used by our group showed that TILs activated ex vivo by an anti-CD3-moAb and IL-2 expressed high levels of perforin, granzyme, and cytokine message. Moreover, up-regulation of these molecules in TILs correlated directly with the survival rate of tumor-bearing animals (27) . Recent trials (35) confirmed the correlation between up-regulation of perforin/granzymes in TILs and clinical response. In patients suffering from follicular lymphoma, TILs displayed high levels of perforin, which was interpreted as a marker of cytotoxic activity and was speculated to be caused by the endogenous local secretion of IL-2 by the tumor cells (35) . A similar result was published for patients with metastatic melanoma. In these patients, s.c. administration of IL-2 enhanced the pool of circulating perforin- or granzyme-positive lymphocytes in a dose-dependent fashion and modulated tumor-specific cytotoxicity (36) .
Our results underline the major advantage of the combined anti-CD3/anti-CD28 Bi-mAb approach by inducing a tumor site-specific activation of the T-cell cytolytic molecular program in vivo. The granule exocytosis model does not depend on receptor-ligand interactions and, in contrast to the FAS/APO-1 system, is not limited to FAS/APO-1-positive cells. Therefore, the described in vivo findings of Bi-mAb-mediated cytotoxicity should be transferable to a wide range of tumors irrespective of their FAS/APO-1 antigen status. As Bi-mAb-targeted and -activated lymphocytes did not home to TAA-negative tissues, the extent of side effects (caused e.g., by damage of normal tissue by activated T cells) should be low.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported in part by Grant PF 135/3-2 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (to M. P.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Universität des Saarlandes, Kirrbergstrasse, D-66421 Homburg, Germany. Phone: 0049-6841/163084; Fax: 0049-6841/163004. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: Bi-mAb, bispecific monoclonal antibody; TAA, tumor-associated antigen; SCID, severe combined immunodeficient/immunodeficiency; moAb, monoclonal antibody; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; RT, reverse transcription; TIL, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte. ![]()
Received 9/21/98. Accepted 2/18/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
chain expression that is reversible by T-cell stimulation with CD3 and CD28. Blood, 88: 236-241, 1996.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
X.-B. Wang, B.-F. Zhao, Q. Zhao, J.-H. Piao, J. Liu, Q. Lin, and H.-L. Huang A New Recombinant Single Chain Trispecific Antibody Recruits T Lymphocytes to Kill CEA (Carcinoma Embryonic Antigen) Positive Tumor Cells In Vitro Efficiently J. Biochem., April 1, 2004; 135(4): 555 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bauer, N. Adrian, B. Williamson, C. Panousis, N. Fadle, J. Smerd, I. Fettah, A. M. Scott, M. Pfreundschuh, and C. Renner Targeted Bioactivity of Membrane-Anchored TNF by an Antibody-Derived TNF Fusion Protein J. Immunol., March 15, 2004; 172(6): 3930 - 3939. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Kipriyanov, B. Cochlovius, H. J. Schafer, G. Moldenhauer, A. Bahre, F. Le Gall, S. Knackmuss, and M. Little Synergistic Antitumor Effect of Bispecific CD19 x CD3 and CD19 x CD16 Diabodies in a Preclinical Model of Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma J. Immunol., July 1, 2002; 169(1): 137 - 144. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |