Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goebel, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Lubensky, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goebel, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Lubensky, I. A.
[Cancer Research 60, 60-63, January 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Identical Clonality of Sporadic Gastrinomas at Multiple Sites

Stephan U. Goebel, Alexander O. Vortmeyer, Zhengping Zhuang, Jose Serrano, Robert T. Jensen and Irina A. Lubensky1

Digestive Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases [S. U. G., J. S., R. T. J.], and Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 [A. O. V., Z. Z., I. A. L.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Gastrinomas are neuroendocrine neoplasms that occur sporadically and in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). In MEN1, multiple gastrinomas have been shown to arise by independent clonal events (Debelenko, et al., Cancer Res., 57: 2238–2243, 1997). The purpose of the present study was to analyze clonality in 20 sporadic gastrinomas from eight patients in whom the tumor was present in at least two separate sites. A combination of methods was used to assess clonality, including MEN1 gene mutation analysis, loss of heterozygosity analysis of the MEN1 locus, and analysis of X-chromosome inactivation at the human androgen receptor locus (human androgen receptor analysis). In three patients, a somantic MEN1 gene mutation was detected in the tumor. Identical mutations were found in other tumors at different sites within the same patients. Human androgen receptor analysis in three informative patients and loss of heterozygosity analysis in five patients revealed identical clonal patterns in the tumors from multiple sites in each patient. We conclude that sporadic gastrinomas at multiple sites are monoclonal and that MEN1 gene alterations in gastrinomas occur before the development of tumor metastases.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Gastrinomas are the most common malignant functional enteropancreatic endocrine tumors, and between 60–90% of the sporadic gastrinomas are reported to be malignant (1) . However, several observations have raised the possibility that sporadic gastrinomas at multiple sites in a single patient may not represent a primary tumor and its metastases. First, a significant proportion of patients with gastrinomas (20–25%) has the tumor as part of the MEN12 syndrome. Previous studies have shown that enteropancreatic endocrine tumors, including gastrinomas, in patients with MEN1 are frequently found simultaneously at multiple sites and arise through independent clonal events (2 , 3) . Secondly, clinical observations in patients with sporadic gastrinomas have cast doubt on the hypothesis that multiple tumors in these patients always reflect a primary tumor and accompanying metastases. In a recent large surgical series of gastrinomas (4) , 10% of the patients had sporadic gastrinomas resected from a lymph node only and were disease-free 5 years after the operation. The possibility of primary lymph node gastrinomas has been previously raised by Arnold et al. (5) . Furthermore, two reports identified isolated cells staining positive for gastrin in 15% of normal lymph nodes from the gastrinoma triangle (6) as well as rests of neuroendocrine cells in regional pancreatic lymph nodes from nongastrinoma patients (7) . These observations raise the question of whether a gastrinoma in the duodenum or pancreas and, concomitantly, one or more lymph nodes in the same patient are multiple primary tumors rather than metastases originating from one primary tumor. Previous studies have also indicated that the tumor growth pattern in an individual patient may change (8) . For example, a patient with no evidence of a gastrinoma by biochemical and imaging studies postresection may develop the clinical signs of an active gastrinoma in a different location years later. This raises the question of whether such a patient developed a second de novo gastrinoma or had metastatic growth of the tumor. Lastly, a recent study reported a mixture of polyclonal and monoclonal growth patterns in sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors (9) . This report included only one gastrinoma without reporting its clonal composition and did not distinguish precisely between individual tumors at multiple sites.

Analysis of clonality in sporadic gastrinomas at multiple sites provides an experimental measure to address the question of whether they represent multiple primary gastrinomas or primary tumors and metastases. Evidence of independent clonal events in these tumors would strongly suggest that tumors arise separately at different times and locations. In contrast, monoclonal growth would support the hypothesis of a single tumor clone and subsequent metastatic spread of the tumor.

In the present study, we analyzed the clonality of sporadic gastrinomas in multiple sites in a given patient with a variety of methods. Forty-four to 93% of sporadic gastrinomas have LOH at the MEN1 locus and 33% carry a mutation within the MEN1 gene (2 , 10 , 11) . Therefore, first we analyzed the tumors for mutations of the MEN1 gene by sequencing. The clonal status of the tumors negative for MEN1 gene mutations was studied using a PCR-based analysis of X-chromosome inactivation in the androgen receptor (AR) gene. Because a subset of cases was not informative by this combined approach, we also analyzed patterns of LOH at the MEN1 locus in tumors at multiple sites.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Patients
Eight patients who underwent exploratory laparotomy for ZES at the NIH between 1990 and 1999 and who had gastrinomas in more than one location were included in this study. The eight patients, six females and two males, were part of a prospective long-term study of ZES. The study protocol was approved by the Clinical Research Committee of the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, and all patients gave informed consent. The diagnosis of ZES was established as previously reported (8) . The absence of MEN1 was diagnosed by lack of a family history and lack of laboratory evidence of other endocrinopathies on a yearly evaluation. All patients initially underwent an exploratory laparotomy for attempted curative resection of the gastrinoma with an extensive intraoperative evaluation, and three patients had repeated operations performed as described previously (4) . All patients had a duodenal or pancreatic gastrinoma and, additionally, a gastrinoma either in the lymph nodes or liver.

Tumors
DNA Extraction. Tumor samples were immediately snap frozen in liquid nitrogen during surgery and stored at -70°C or formalin-fixed and embedded in paraffin. Tumor DNA was extracted from 5-µm sections of the specimens using a commercial kit (DNA Mini Kit, Qiagen Inc., Santa Clarita, CA) after analyzing an adjacent slide with H&E staining to determine that the specimen contained at least 90% tumor cells. In those specimens with significant portions of normal tissue mixed in with the tumor, DNA was extracted after tumor microdissection as previously described (12) .

Mutational Analysis. Primers for amplification of the MEN1 gene were obtained according to the published sequences (http://www.nhgri.nih.gov). PCR was carried out under previously published conditions (13) . Direct sequencing of the exons was performed (AmpliCycle, Perkin-Elmer) in sense and antisense direction in duplicate. Leukocyte DNA from the same patients was simultaneously sequenced and an underlying germ-line mutation was ruled out.

X-Chromosome Inactivation Analysis. Extracted tumor DNA from female patients was digested with HpaII (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and compared to the undigested DNA. The DNA was then PCR amplified with primers for the HUMARA using previously published conditions (14 , 15) . The case was considered informative if the undigested tumor DNA of the patient showed two different alleles of equal intensity (i.e., polyclonal). The absence or significant reduction of one allele in the digested tumor DNA was interpreted as evidence of monoclonality. Analysis was performed in duplicate and yielded the same results.

LOH Analysis. The four polymorphic DNA markers: D11S480, PYGM, D11S449, and INT-2 encompass the MEN1 locus on chromosome 11q13, and the method of LOH analysis has been previously published (2) . The case was considered informative if the DNA from nontumor tissue of the patient showed two different alleles (i.e., heterozygosity). When comparing the two alleles in the tumor, the near complete (>90% decreased intensity) or complete absence of one allele was interpreted as LOH. Analysis was performed in duplicate and yielded the same results.


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
A total of 20 tumors from eight patients with ZES were studied preoperatively. All patients had elevated fasting serum gastrin levels with hyperchlorhydria or an elevated secretin-stimulated or calcium-stimulated gastrin release indicative of active ZES. Tumor location and results of tumor DNA analysis are summarized in Table 1Citation . We found three different mutations of the MEN1 gene in the tumor DNA but not in the corresponding leukocyte DNA in three patients (patients 3, 7, and 8). In each of the three patients, the identical somatic mutation was found in all individual tumors from the multiple sites (Table 1)Citation . The results of sequencing analysis of tumors in patient 3, in whom a single base pair deletion 730delG was detected in one duodenal gastrinoma and two separate portions of a large lymph node containing a gastrinoma, are shown in Fig. 1Citation . Similarly, in patients 7 and 8, the mutations in the MEN1 gene (1212del7 and 483delAT, respectively) were identified in the duodenal gastrinoma, in one lymph node gastrinoma (patient 7), and in two lymph node gastrinomas (patient 8) removed during separate operations.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Clinical characteristics and results of molecular analysis in 20 sporadic gastrinomas from eight patients

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Sequencing analysis of tumor DNA (T1, T2a, and T2b) and corresponding leukocyte DNA (WBC) from patient 3 with ZES. The results show the identical somatic mutation of the MEN-1 gene (arrowhead, 730delG, antisense strand shown) in the duodenal gastrinoma (T1) and two separate portions of the large lymph node with gastrinoma (T2a and T2b), which is not seen in the leukocytes (WBC). All tumor specimens show the mutated as well as faint normal allele reflecting the presence of contamination from normal surrounding tissue.

 
Analysis of X-chromosome inactivation revealed identical inactivation patterns in all tumors from each of three female patients in whom the assay was informative (patients 2, 4, and 6; Table 1Citation ). An example for such a monoclonal tumor in patient 6 is shown in Fig. 2Citation . All four separate lymph nodes with gastrinomas (T1-4) show loss of the upper allele (upper arrow) as compared to the undigested DNA (No).



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. X-chromosome inactivation pattern in four tumors from female patient 6. Tumor DNA (T1T4) digested with HpaII and one undigested tumor sample (No) were amplified by PCR with primers (molecular weight range, 253–313 bp) for the human androgen receptor (Humara; Ref. 17 ). All digested tumor samples show loss of the upper band (upper arrowhead) when compared to the undigested tumor sample indicative of a single clone.

 
LOH analysis with four polymorphic MEN1 gene markers showed the same pattern of loss or retention of heterozygosity in all tumors from each of five patients tested (patients 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6; Table 1Citation ). Patients 1, 2, and 5 showed identical patterns of LOH at the MEN1 locus in every tumor within each patient, whereas patients 4 and 6 demonstrated identical patterns of retention of heterozygosity in every tumor within each patient. Examples of the LOH results for three markers (PYGM, D11S449, and INT-2) in tumors from patient 2 are shown in Fig. 3Citation .



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Results of LOH at 11q13 for three polymorphic markers (PYGM, D11S449, and INT-2) in two tumors from patient 2. The three markers span the region of the MEN1 gene. The results for PYGM (top panel; molecular weight range, 120–130 bp; http://www.resgen.com) show that the upper allele (upper arrowhead) is lost in DNA from both tumors (T1 and T2) when compared to DNA from surrounding normal tissue (N). For INT-2 (middle panel; molecular weight range 161–177 bp; http://www.resgen.com) and D11S449 (bottom panel; molecular weight ~215 bp; Ref. 18 ), both tumors (T1 and T2) show loss of the lower allele (lower arrowhead) when compared to surrounding normal tissue (N).

 

    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Gastrinomas occur sporadically (75%) and as a manifestation of MEN1 (25%) and can occur at multiple sites, suggesting either multifocal tumor origin or metastatic spread from a primary tumor (1) . Interestingly, the sporadic gastrinoma and the MEN1-associated variant are indistinguishable by morphological criteria and both may show heterogeneous immunohistochemistry staining for various peptides. At present, it is not known whether the events underlying tumor initiation and progression are the same in sporadic and inherited forms of gastrinomas. We have previously used LOH combined with X-chromosome inactivation analysis to demonstrate that multiple enteropancreatic endocrine tumors, more specifically gastrinomas, in patients with familial MEN1 develop as independent clones (2 , 3) . This underscores the multifocal development of enteropancreatic endocrine tumors in patients with MEN1 and indicates that the genetic events underlying tumor development or progression of gastrinomas may occur simultaneously at multiple sites.

In the present study, we provide several independent lines of evidence that in contrast to multiple gastrinomas in MEN1 patients, sporadic gastrinomas at different sites are of the same clonal composition. First, the mutational analysis of the MEN1 gene in different tumors of three patients revealed identical mutation in each tumor. The presence of the same mutation in all tested tumors from an individual patient indicates that all tumor cells are of monoclonal composition. The finding of identical MEN1 mutations in tumors at multiple sites strongly suggests a single mutational event that has been passed on to subsequent tumor cell generations rather than several independent mutational events that occurred in the course of the disease. This finding is significant especially in view of the fact that somatic and germ-line MEN1 gene mutations are scattered throughout the entire gene, and mutational hotspots have not been identified (10 , 16) . Second, the X-chromosome inactivation pattern was identical in all tumors from each of the three patients, suggesting that all tumors from different sites within a given patient were derived from the same clone. Third, all different tumors in each of the five informative patients tested for LOH with four polymorphic markers at the MEN1 locus had identical patterns of loss or retention of heterozygosity. This suggests that the inactivation of the second allele of the MEN1 gene by LOH occurred in a single cell and was propagated to all daughter cells.

Our data support the conclusion that sporadic gastrinomas in multiple sites are of clonal origin. Therefore, the common clinical presentation of a sporable duodenal or pancreatic gastrinoma simultaneously with a lymph node or liver tumor represents a primary tumor metastases as opposed to independent tumors. A recent study by Perren et al. (9) reported that other sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors were as likely to be polyclonal as monoclonal. However, the authors observed a predominantly polyclonal growth pattern among tumors referred to as "benign" (5/7; 71%) and oligo- or monoclonal growth pattern in those tumors defined as "malignant" (8/13; 62%). The authors proposed that a growth pattern of sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumors may initially involve several tumor clones and then, once a single clone has a distinct growth advantage, a monoclonal growth pattern may evolve, i.e., clonal evolution (9) . The results of the present study could be interpreted as evidence that molecular pathogenesis of sporadic gastrinomas in multiple sites differs from the pathogenesis of other pancreatic endocrine tumors (nongastrinoma) or as evidence for the clonal evolution of sporadic gastrinomas. The former interpretation would be supported by the fact that we only found evidence for a monoclonal growth pattern in sporadic gastrinomas and we did not observe any polyclonal growth patterns in the gastrinomas using multiple different techniques. The latter interpretation should also be considered in view of the fact that our goal was to study gastrinomas at multiple sites in individual patients. Therefore, we selected for patients with possibly aggressive disease. Such patients represent the largest group of gastrinoma patients encountered clinically because 60–90% of all gastrinomas are reported to be malignant (1) .

MEN1 gene mutations are found in about 33% of sporadic gastrinomas (10 , 11) , but the functional relevance of such a mutation in the tumor development has not been elucidated. Identical mutations and deletions in the primary tumor and its metastases within the same patient not only indicate that multiple tumors are derived from one founding cell with these genetic alterations but also provide insight into the timing of such an event. Identical mutation and deletion patterns of the MEN1 gene were detected in the primary gastrinoma as well as in all metastases; therefore, the genetic changes must have occurred before the spread of the tumor.

In summary, we provide molecular evidence that sporadic gastrinomas in multiple sites are monoclonal in growth and in fact represent a primary tumor and subsequent metastases as opposed to independent tumors. Furthermore, the finding of identical MEN1 gene mutations and LOH patterns in primary tumors and its metastases within an individual patient is indicative of mutational/deletional events that have occurred before the development of metastases.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. H. Richard Alexander, Jeffrey A. Norton, and Douglas L. Fraker, Surgery Branch, National Cancer Institute, who performed surgery on the subjects studied.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Laboratory of Pathology/National Cancer Institute/NIH, Building 10, Room 2A33, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20892. Fax: (301) 402-0043; Phone: (301) 496-0549; E-mail: Lubensky{at}box-l.nih.gov Back

2 The abbreviations used are: MEN1, multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; ZES, Zollinger-Ellison syndrome; HUMARA, human androgen receptor analysis. Back

Received 8/23/99. Accepted 11/10/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Jensen, R. T., and Gardner, J. D. Gastrinoma. In: Go, V. L. W., Dimango, E. P., Gardner J. D., Lebenthal E., Reber H. A., and Scheele G. A. (eds.), The Pancreas: Biology, Pathobiology and Disease. 2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 931–978. New York, NY: Raven Press Publishing Co., 1993.
  2. Debelenko L. V., Zhuang Z., Emmert-Buck M. R., Chandrasekharappa S. C., Manickam P., Guru S. C., Marx S. J., Skarulis M. C., Spiegel A. M., Collins F. S., Jensen R. T., Liotta L. A., Lubensky I. A. Allelic deletions on chromosome 11q13 in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1-associated and sporadic gastrinomas and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Cancer Res., 57: 2238-2243, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Lubensky I. A., Debelenko L. V., Zhuang Z., Emmert-Buck M. R., Dong Q., Chandrasekharappa S., Guru S. C., Manickam P., Olufemi S. E., Marx S. J., Spiegel A. M., Collins F. S., Liotta L. A. Allelic deletions on chromosome 11q13 in multiple tumors from individual MEN1 patients. Cancer Res., 56: 5272-5278, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Norton J. A., Fraker D. L., Alexander H. R., Venzon D. J., Doppman J. L., Serrano J., Goebel S. U., Peghini P. L., Roy P. K., Gibril F., Jensen R. T. Surgery to cure the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome [see comments]. N. Engl. J. Med., 341: 635-644, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Arnold, W. S., Fraker, D. L., Alexander, H. R., Weber, H. C., Norton, J. A., and Jensen, R. T. Apparent lymph node primary gastrinoma. Surgery, 116: 1123–1129 and 1129–1130, 1994.
  6. Herrmann M. E., Ciesla M. C., Chejfec S., DeJong S., Yong S. Primary nodal gastrinomas-immunohistochemical study in support of a theory. Mod. Pathol., 12: 68A 1999.
  7. Perrier N. D., Batts K. P., Thompson G. B., Grant C. S., Plummer T. B. An immunohistochemical survey for neuroendocrine cells in regional pancreatic lymph nodes: a plausible explanation for primary nodal gastrinomas? Mayo Clinic Pancreatic Surgery Group. Surgery, 118: 957-965, 1995.[Medline]
  8. Fishbeyn V. A., Norton J. A., Benya R. V., Pisegna J. R., Venzon D. J., Metz D. C., Jensen R. T. Assessment and prediction of long-term cure in patients with the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome: the best approach. Ann. Intern. Med., 119: 199-206, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Perren A., Roth J., Muletta-Feurer S., Saremaslani P., Speel E. J., Heitz P. U., Komminoth P. Clonal analysis of sporadic pancreatic endocrine tumours. J. Pathol., 186: 363-371, 1998.[Medline]
  10. Zhuang Z., Vortmeyer A. O., Pack S., Huang S., Pham T. A., Wang C., Park W. S., Agarwal S. K., Debelenko L. V., Kester M., Guru S. C., Manickam P., Olufemi S. E., Yu F., Heppner C., Crabtree J. S., Skarulis M. C., Venzon D. J., Emmert-Buck M. R., Spiegel A. M., Chandrasekharappa S. C., Collins F. S., Burns A. L., Marx S. J., Jensen R. T., Liotta L. A., Lubensky I. A. Somatic mutations of the MEN1 tumor suppressor gene in sporadic gastrinomas and insulinomas. Cancer Res., 57: 4682-4686, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Goebel, S. U., Heppner, C., Burns, A. L., Marx, S. J., Spiegel, A. M., Zhuang, Z., Lubensky, I. A., Gibril, F., Jensen, R. T., and Serrano, J. Genotype/phenotype correlation of MEN1 gene mutations in sporadic gastrinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., in press, 2000.
  12. Zhuang Z., Bertheau P., Emmert-Buck M. R., Liotta L. A., Gnarra J., Linehan W. M., Lubensky I. A. A microdissection technique for archival DNA analysis of specific cell populations in lesions 1 mm in size. Am. J. Pathol., 146: 620-625, 1995.[Abstract]
  13. Chandrasekharappa S. C., Guru S. C., Manickam P., Olufemi S. E., Collins F. S., Emmert-Buck M. R., Debelenko L. V., Zhuang Z., Lubensky I. A., Liotta L. A., Crabtree J. S., Wang Y., Roe B. A., Weisemann J., Boguski M. S., Agarwal S. K., Kester M. B., Kim Y. S., Heppner C., Dong Q., Spiegel A. M., Burns A. L., Marx S. J. Positional cloning of the gene for multiple endocrine neoplasia-type 1. Science (Washington DC), 276: 404-407, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Enomoto T., Fujita M., Inoue M., Tanizawa O., Nomura T., Shroyer K. R. Analysis of clonality by amplification of short tandem repeats. Carcinomas of the female reproductive tract. Diagn. Mol. Pathol., 3: 292-297, 1994.[Medline]
  15. Allen R. C., Zoghbi H. Y., Moseley A. B., Rosenblatt H. M., Belmont J. W. Methylation of HpaII and HhaI sites near the polymorphic CAG repeat in the human androgen-receptor gene correlates with X chromosome inactivation. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 51: 1229-1239, 1992.[Medline]
  16. Agarwal S. K., Kester M. B., Debelenko L. V., Heppner C., Emmert-Buck M. R., Skarulis M. C., Doppman J. L., Kim Y. S., Lubensky I. A., Zhuang Z., Green J. S., Guru S. C., Manickam P., Olufemi S. E., Liotta L. A., Chandrasekharappa S. C., Collins F. S., Spiegel A. M., Burns A. L., Marx S. J. Germ-line mutations of the MEN1 gene in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 and related states. Hum. Mol. Genet., 6: 1169-1175, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fujita M., Enomoto T., Wada H., Inoue M., Okudaira Y., Shroyer K. R. Application of clonal analysis. Differential diagnosis for synchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancers and metastatic cancer. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 105: 350-359, 1996.[Medline]
  18. Courseaux A., Grosgeorge J., Gaudray P., Pannett A. A., Forbes S. A., Williamson C., Bassett D., Thakker R. V., Teh B. T., Farnebo F., Shepherd J., Skogseid B., Larsson C., Giraud S., Zhang C. X., Salandre J., Calender A., (The European Consortium on MEN1). Definition of the minimal MEN1 candidate area based on a 5-Mb integrated map of proximal 11q13. Genomics, 37: 354-365, 1996.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. Yu, R. T. Jensen, I. A. Lubensky, E. H. Mahlamaki, Y.-L. Zheng, A. M. Herr, and L. J. Ferrin
Survey of Genetic Alterations in Gastrinomas
Cancer Res., October 1, 2000; 60(19): 5536 - 5542.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. R. Antonescu, A. Elahi, J. H. Healey, M. F. Brennan, M. Y. Lui, J. Lewis, S. C. Jhanwar, J. M. Woodruff, and M. Ladanyi
Monoclonality of Multifocal Myxoid Liposarcoma: Confirmation by Analysis of TLS-CHOP or EWS-CHOP Rearrangements
Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2000; 6(7): 2788 - 2793.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Goebel, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Lubensky, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Goebel, S. U.
Right arrow Articles by Lubensky, I. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online