Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  AACR Conference on Molecular Diagnostics - 2008
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. Y.
[Cancer Research 60, 70-73, January 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

A Distinct Tumor Suppressor Gene Locus on Chromosome 15q21.1 in Sporadic Form of Colorectal Cancer1

Won Sang Park, Jik Young Park, Ro Ra Oh, Nam Jin Yoo, Sug Hyung Lee, Min Sun Shin, Hun Kyung Lee, Seoyoung Han, Sungjoo Kim Yoon, Su Young Kim, Chan Choi, Pum Joon Kim, Seong Taek Oh and Jung Young Lee2

Department of Pathology and Cancer Research Institute [W. S. P., J. Y. P., R. R. O., N. J. Y., S. H. L., M. S. S., H. K. L., S. H., S. Y. K., P. J. K., J. Y. L.], Department of Surgery [S. T. O.], and Research Institute of Molecular Genetics [S. K. Y.], College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701; and Department of Pathology, Chonnam University Medical School, Kwangju 501-190 [C. C.], Korea


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The SM1311 family is an Ashkenazi family with dominantly inherited predisposition to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas and has a high-penetrance locus in chromosome 15q, with a multipoint logarithm of the odds score of 3.06 at marker D15S118. In the present study, we performed a high-density loss of heterozygosity study with 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers, including D15S118, spanning 15q15.3-q22.1, on 70 cases of the sporadic form of colorectal tumors. Our deletion mapping data showed a locus at D15S968 in chromosomal sub-band 15q21.1 may harbor a tumor suppressor gene in an area <0.521 Mb in physical map distance defined by markers D15S514 and D15S222. THBS1, 0.185 Mb proximal to D15S968, is the nearest known gene to this specific narrow loss of heterozygosity region. Thus, we speculate that THBS1 might be the most probable candidate gene involved in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Colorectal cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer death in the world, and about 15% have a hereditary component. Two major colorectal cancer predisposition syndromes, familial adenomatous polyposis and hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer, account for up to only 5% of the total new cases of colorectal cancer (1) . A number of other rare inherited syndromes, including juvenile poly-posis (2) and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (3 , 4) , are also associated with increased susceptibility to colorectal cancer. Recently, a missense APC3 polymorphism (I1307K) was reported that indirectly leads to colorectal adenoma and carcinoma predisposition by creating a region of the gene that is prone to somatic mutations (5) . This APC variant allele was observed in 6% of Ashkenazi Jews and about 28% of Ashkenazims with a family history of colorectal cancer. However, the genes responsible for most of the familial cases are unknown as of yet.

Recently, Tomlinson et al. (6) described that the SM1311 family is an Ashkenazi family with dominantly inherited predisposition to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. This family has no evidence of linkage to known colorectal cancer susceptibility loci (including APC, TP53, PTEN, hMSH2, hMSH6, hMLH1, hPMS1, hPMS2, and SMAD4), no germline mutation of APC, hMSH2, and hMLH1, and no T-to-A I1307K APC polymorphism (6) . Furthermore, Tomlinson et al. (6) demonstrated a high-penetrance locus in chromosome 15q with a multipoint logarithm of the odds score of 3.06 at marker D15S118 in the SM1311 family by way of genetic linkage analysis. These results strongly suggested that there might be a new tumor suppressor gene on the chromosomal region 15q for the sporadic form of colorectal cancer.

In the present study, we performed a high-density LOH study with 13 polymorphic microsatellite markers, including D15S118, spanning 15q15.3-q22.1, on 70 cases of the sporadic form of colorectal tumors (26 adenomas and 44 carcinomas). Our results indicate that a locus at D15S968 in chromosomal sub-band 15q21.1 may harbor a new tumor suppressor gene in an area <0.521 Mb in physical map distance defined by markers D15S514 and D15S222. THBS1, 0.185 Mb proximal to D15S968, is the nearest gene to this specific narrow LOH region. Thus, we speculate that THBS1 is the most probable candidate gene involved in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Materials.
A total of 70 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sporadic colorectal tumor specimens (26 adenomas, 11 right-sided and 15 left-sided; 44 invasive cancers, 16 right-sided and 28 left-sided) were obtained from College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea. None of the patients had a family history of Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis, or hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer.

Microdissection and DNA Extraction.
Tumor cells were selectively procured from H&E-stained slides using a 30 G1/2 hypodermic needle (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lake, NJ) affixed to a microdissection device [SPEM II (Simple, Precise, and Economical Microdissection device); BM Korea Co., Seoul, Korea], as described previously (7) . We also obtained inflammatory or surrounding normal mucosa cells for corresponding normal DNAs from the same slides in all cases. DNA extraction was performed by a modified single-step DNA extraction method, as described previously (8) .

LOH Analysis.
Tumor DNA and corresponding normal DNA from each slide were amplified by thermal cycler (MJ Research, Inc., Watertown, MA) with 13 microsatellite markers (Research Genetic, Huntsville, AL), including D15S1040, D15S971, and D15S118 in the 15q15.3 region; D15S129, D15S514, D15S968, D15S222, D15S132, and D15S209 in the 15q21.1 region; D15S117 and D15S195 in the 15q21.2 region; D15S1036 in the 15q21.3 region; and D15S108 in the 15q22.1 region. Each PCR reaction was generally performed under standard conditions in a 10-µl reaction mixture containing 1 µl of template DNA, 0.4 µM each primer, 125 µM each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.4 unit of Taq polymerase, 0.5 µCi of [32P]dCTP (Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom), and 1 µl of 10x buffer. The reaction mixture was denatured for 5 min at 95°C and incubated for 35 cycles (denaturing at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 57°C for 90 s, and extending at 72°C for 90 s), with variations in the annealing temperature. Final extension was continued for 10 min. Reaction products (2 µl) were then denatured and electrophoresed in 6% polyacrylamide gels containing 7 M urea. After electrophoresis, the gels were transferred to 3MM Whatman paper, dried, and subject to autoradiography using Kodak X-OMAT film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Through the microdissection, we selectively procured malignant glandular epithelial cells nearly devoid of normal cell contamination, as shown in Fig. 1Citation . The fixed marker order and physical map distance for 13 markers were obtained from the genetic location database.4 Twenty-four of 26 adenomas and 40 of 44 adenocarcinomas were informative for at least one of the markers studied. The remaining two adenomas and four adenocarcinomas were considered noninformative, because all these tumors showed microsatellite instability in all markers and it was impossible to analyze the LOH in these cases. We observed no LOH at all in 24 informative adenomas (10 right-sided, 14 left-sided). In invasive carcinomas, 14 of 40 informative cases (35%) showed allelic loss of at least one informative marker within 15q15.3–22.1. Among these 14 cases, 7 (case no. 4, 12, 28, 48, 54, 69, and 71) showed allelic loss at every informative marker, suggesting a whole chromosome loss in each case (Figs. 2Citation 3Citation ). The remaining seven tumors showed interstitial deletions. Among these, cases 8 and 23 revealed allelic loss at only one marker, D15S968; this single region, marked distally by D15S222 and proximally by D15S514, revealed allelic loss in all 14 tumor cases that showed allelic loss of at least one informative marker (Figs. 2Citation 3Citation ). Constitutional heterozygosity at D15S514, 0.439 Mb proximal to D15S968, was retained in case 23 (Fig. 2Citation ), and two cases (6 and 43) retained heterozygosity at D15S222, which is about 0.082 Mb distal to D15S968 (Fig. 3Citation ). These results indicate that a locus at D15S968 in chromosomal sub-band 15q21.1 may harbor a tumor suppressor gene in an area <0.521 Mb in physical map distance defined by markers D15S514 and D15S222. There was no significant difference in allelic loss frequencies between the left-sided and right-sided colon cancers.



View larger version (122K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A, an area of colorectal cancer before microdissection showing several tumor nests surrounded by stromal cells. The needle tip (arrow) was attached to a preselected tumor cell nest using SPEM II microdissection device. H&E, original magnification, x40. B, the tumor cell nest is easily peeling off from the slide during the microdissection. C, three tumor cell nests were dissected out, leaving large holes behind.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. For each of the 13 polymorphic markers, autoradiograms of LOH analysis for three selected cases are shown. Case 23 exhibits LOH at only one locus (D15S958), the D15S118 marker shows microsatellite instability, and heterozygosity is retained at four loci, including D15S514, which is the proximal border of D15S968. Case 13 reveals allelic loss at seven loci, and heterozygosity is retained at the five most distal markers, except D15S195 (noninformative). Case 69 shows allelic loss at 10 loci, with three noninformative markers. Arrowheads indicate allelic loss in tumor DNA. The numbers at the top represent the microsatellite markers. N, normal DNA; T, tumor DNA.

 


View larger version (44K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Deletion map of chromosome 15q15.3-q22.1 with 14 cases of the sporadic form of colorectal cancers. The smallest region of overlap of deletion spans marker D15S968. Mb, physical map distance; sbl, sub-band location; {blacksquare} , LOH; {square} , no LOH; , noninformative. The numbers at the top represent the case number of colorectal cancers. The percentage numbers in the right column represent the overall frequency of LOH in colorectal cancers.

 
The autoradiograms of three selected cases showing LOH are displayed in Fig. 2Citation , and a fine deletion map of chromosome 15q15.3-q21.1 is shown in Fig. 3Citation . The almost complete absence of a signal in deleted alleles of tumor DNA (Fig. 2Citation , arrowheads) suggests that tumor samples are nearly devoid of normal cell contamination.


    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Colorectal cancer carcinogenesis is a multistep process and seems to require at least seven genetic events for completion (1 , 9) . However, the whole process of colorectal cancer carcinogenesis is still poorly understood. Recently, Tomlinson et al. (6) described a high-penetrance locus in chromosome 15q with a multipoint logarithm of odds score of 3.06 at marker D15S118 in the SM1311 Ashkenazi family, which has dominantly inherited predisposition to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. These results strongly suggest that there might be a new tumor suppressor gene near the D15S118 marker on chromosomal region 15q, however, specific narrow regions of LOH in this area on colorectal cancer have not yet been defined. This led us to focus our attention on chromosomal region 15q15.3-q22.1, including marker D15S118 in the sporadic form of colorectal cancer.

For finely detailed deletion mapping, we performed a high-density LOH study with 13 microsatellite markers, including D15S118 in 70 colorectal tumors; thirteen of these markers were positioned approximately every 1 Mb or less throughout chromosomal band 15q15.3-q22.1 (physical map distance from 48.850–64.265 Mb). Our deletion mapping data revealed a common region of deletion at D15S968, 2.62 Mb distal to D15S118, which indicated the presence of a potential tumor suppressor gene in an area <0.521 Mb in physical map distance defined by markers D15S514 and D15S222 (Fig. 3Citation ). This is the first study documenting the observation of specific allele loss of chromosome 15 in the sporadic form of colorectal cancer and is an important step toward the eventual isolation of a putative tumor suppressor gene associated with colorectal cancer by positional cloning. Up to date, however, five genes are known to be located in this narrow LOH region5 ; solute carrier family 12 member 1 (SLC12A1), microfibrillar-associated protein 1 (MFAP1), cholesterol repressible protein 39B (CHR39B), calpain large polypetide L3 (CAPN3), and THBS1. Of these genes, THBS1 is the nearest gene to marker D15S968, 0.185 Mb proximal to D15S968. Although we did not perform positional cloning in this region, we suspect that THBS1 is the most probable candidate tumor suppressor gene involving colorectal cancer at present because it is already known that THBS1 has tumor suppressor properties.

THBS1 is a multifunctional glycoprotein with p53- and retinoblastoma-regulated angiogenesis inhibition property and is found in platelets and secreted by a wide range of tissues, where it is incorporated into the extracellular matrix. THBS1 has been reported to modulate platelet aggregation, wound healing, protease activity, and cellular functions such as adherence, motility, and growth (10 , 11) . In addition to these diverse functions, it is a potent antiangiogenic factor (12) . There is accumulating evidence that THBS1 has tumor suppressor properties, presumably through the inhibition of neovascularization: (a) THBS1 was present in quiscent vessels, and levels were decreased or were absent in actively forming endothelial sprouts (13) ; (b) THBS1 expression was shut off in rapidly growing endothelial cells from mouse hemangiomas induced by the polyoma virus middle 1 antigen (14) ; (c) THBS1 production correlated inversely with tumorigeneity and/or metastatic potential in breast, melanoma, and lung cancer cell lines (15) ; (d) transfection of THBS1 resulted in reduced size of the heterotransplanted primary tumors, a decrease in spontaneous pulmonary metastasis of human breast carcinoma cells, and suppressed tumorigenesity of transformed NIH3T3 cells (12 , 15) ; and (e) reintroduction of an extra copy of chromosome 15 into human skin cancer cells lacking one copy of chromosome 15 resulted in tumor suppression (16) . Other known functions of THBS1 in addition to angiogenesis may also contribute to tumor progression. For instance, THBS1 is a tight-binding competitive inhibitor of several proteases. Thus, low expression of THBS1 in cancer cells could enhance invasion through the matrix by uninhibited protease activity (17) . Therefore, the THBS1 gene seems to be a new tumor suppressor gene involved in a late event, including tumor progression and/or metastasis in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis, as well as in other human cancers.

DNA methylation of promoter-associated CpG islands, which results in the transcriptional inactivation of selected genes in cancer, is one of the alternative mechanisms of silencing tumor suppressor genes (18) . The THBS1 promoter also contains a typical CpG island that starts 1.3 kb upstream of exon 1 at the ends of intron 1 (19) . Although the cause of THBS1 methylation in cancers remains to be defined, methylation of the THBS1 gene has also been reported in glioblastoma multiforme and in a subset of colorectal cancer (19 , 20) . These observations also strongly suggest that THBS1 is a tumor suppressor gene.

In the present study, the frequency of LOH at D15S968 was 44.4% (8 of 18 informative cancer cases; Fig. 3Citation ). Although the frequency of LOH at this marker is not that high, because it was detected only in invasive cancers, we speculate that allelic loss of this area might be involved in colorectal cancer progression but not in tumor initiation. Losses overlapping this same region have also been observed in several other tumor types, including mesothelioma (21) , prostate cancer (22) , and ovarian cancer (23) . Furthermore, Wick et al. (24) demonstrated a significant difference in LOH frequency in this area between nonmetastatic primary breast cancer (11%) and metastatic cancer to the brain (70%). These results are in agreement with our data that the D15S968 area might harbor a tumor suppressor gene involving tumor progression and/or metastasis in colorectal cancers and strongly suggest that it requires mutational, methylation studies, as well as LOH analysis in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers.

Tomlinson et al. (6) pinpointed the locus of the responsible gene of the SM1311 family to D15S118, which lies 2.62 Mb proximal to marker D15S968. In the present study, eight cases showed LOH at D15S118, but one case (case 27) retained heterozygosity at this locus. The question of whether the responsible gene loci for the SM1311 family and D15S968 or THBS1 loci are the same was unclear at the time of this study, however, THBS1 may possibly be the responsible gene for the SM1311 family because the physical map distance between THBS1 and D15S118 is only 2.345 Mb apart (Fig. 3Citation ).

In summary, we have been able to detect a distinct region for a putative tumor suppressor gene of colorectal cancer with 44.4% of LOH frequency at marker D15S968, measuring 0.521 Mb in physical distance by way of high-density LOH analysis. We concluded that THBS1, 0.185 Mb proximal to D15S968, is the most probable candidate gene involving tumor progression in colorectal cancer as well as other human malignancies. Mutational and methylation studies of THBS1 in primary and metastatic colorectal cancers are currently in progress.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by funding from the "Molecular Medicine Research Group" program from the Ministry of Science and Technology of Korea (98-J03-02-01-A-02) and the Catholic Medical Center Research Fund for special projects (99). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul 137-701, Korea. Phone: 822-590-1190; Fax: 822-537-6586; E-mail: stingray{at}cmc.cuk.ac.kr Back

3 The abbreviations used are: APC, adenomatous polyposis coli; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; THBS1, thrombospondin 1. Back

4 http://bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/databases/ldb/chrom15/gmap. Back

5 http://bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il/databases/ldb/chrom15/gene.htlm. Back

Received 7/28/99. Accepted 11/11/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Lessons from hereditary colorectal cancer. Cell, 87: 159-170, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Jacoby R. F., Schlack S., Cole C. E., Skarbek M., Harris C., Meisner L. F. A juvenile polyposis tumor suppressor locus at 10q22 is deleted from nonepithelial cells in the lamina propria. Gastroenterology, 112: 1398-1403, 1997.[Medline]
  3. Hemminki A., Markie D., Tomlinson I., Avizienyte E., Roth S., Loukola A., Bignell G., Warren W., Aminoff M., Höglund P., Järvinen H., Kristo P., Pelin K., Ridanpää M., Salovaara R., Toro T., Bodmer W., Olschwang S., Oslen A. S., Stratton M. R., de la Chapelle A., Altonen L. A. A serine/threonine kinase gene defective in Peutz-Jeghers syndrome. Nature (Lond.), 391: 184-187, 1998.[Medline]
  4. Dong S. M., Kim K. M., Kim S. Y., Shin M. S., Na E. Y., Lee S. H., Park W. S., Yoo N. J., Jang J. J., Yoon C. Y., Kim J. W., Kim S. Y., Yang Y. M., Kim S. H., Kim C. S., Lee J. Y. Frequent somatic mutations in serine/threonine kinase 11/Peutz-Jeghers syndrome gene in left-sided colon cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 3787-3790, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Laken S. J., Petersen G. M., Gruber S. B., Oddoux C., Ostrer H., Gialdiello F. M., Hamilton S. R., Hampel H., Markowitz A., Klimstra D., Jhanwar S., Winawer S., Offit K., Luce M. C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Familial colorectal cancer in Ashkenazim due to a hypermutable tract in APC. Nat. Genet., 17: 79-83, 1997.[Medline]
  6. Tomlinson I., Rahman N., Frayling I., Mangion J., Barfoot R., Hamoudi R., Seal S., Norhover J., Thomas H. J. W., Neale K., Hodgson S., Talbot I., Houlston R., Stratton M. R. Inherited susceptibility to colorectal adenomas and carcinomas: evidence for a new predisposition gene on 15q14–q22. Gastroenterology, 116: 789-795, 1999.[Medline]
  7. Lee J. Y., Dong S. M., Kim S. Y., Yoo N. J., Lee S. H., Park W. S. A simple, precise and economical microdissection technique for analysis of genomic DNA from archival tissue sections. Virchows Arch., 433: 305-309, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Lee J. Y., Dong S. M., Kim H. S., Kim S. Y., Na E. Y., Shin M. S., Lee S. H., Park W. S., Kim K. M., Lee Y. S., Jang J. J., Yoo N. J. A distinct region of chromosome 19p13.3 associated with the sporadic form of adenoma malignum of the uterine cervix. Cancer Res., 58: 1143-1143, 1998.
  9. Fearon E. R., Vogelstein B. A genetic model for colorectal tumorigenesis. Cell, 61: 759-767, 1990.[Medline]
  10. Quian X., Tuszynski G. P. Expression of thrombospondin-1 in cancer: a role in tumor progression. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med., 212: 199-207, 1996.[Abstract]
  11. Dareron K. M., Volpert O. V., Tainsky M. A., Bouck N. Control of angiogenesis in fibroblasts by p53 regulation of thrombospondin-1. Science (Washington DC), 265: 1582-1584, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Weinstat-Saalow D. L., Zabrensky V. S., Vanhoutte K., Frazier W. A., Roberts D. D., Steeg P. S. Transfection of thrombospondin 1 complementary DNA into a human breast carcinoma cell line reduces primary tumor growth, metastatic potential, and angiogenesis. Cancer Res., 54: 6504-6511, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Canfield A. E., Schor A. M. Evidence that tenascin and thrombospondin-1 modulate sprouting of endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci., 108: 797-809, 1995.[Abstract]
  14. Sheibani N., Frazier W. A. Thrombospondin 1 expression in transformed endothelial cells restores a normal phenotype and suppresses their tumorigenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 6788-6792, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Zabrensky V., Harris C. C., Steeg P. S., Roberts D. D. Expression of the extracellular matrix molecule thrombospondin inversely correlates with malignant progression in melanoma, lung and breast carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Cancer, 59: 191-195, 1994.[Medline]
  16. Bleuel K., Popp S., Eusnig N. E., Stanbridge E. J., Boukamp P. Tumor suppression in human skin carcinoma cells by chromosome 15 transfer or thrombospondin-1 overexpression through halted tumor vascularization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 2065-2070, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Roberts D. D. Regulation of tumor growth and metastasis by thrombospondin-1. FASEB J., 10: 1183-1191, 1996.[Abstract]
  18. Baylin S. B., Herman J. G., Graff J. R., Vertino P. M., Issa J. P. J. Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia. Adv. Cancer Res., 72: 141-196, 1997.
  19. Li Q., Ahuja N., Burger P. C., Issa J. P. J. Methylation and silencing of the thrombospondin-1 promoter in human cancer. Oncogene, 18: 3284-3289, 1999.[Medline]
  20. Ahuja N., Mohan A. L., Li Q., Stolker J. M., Herman J. G., Hamilton S. R., Baylin S. B., Issa J. P. J. Association between CpG island methylation and microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 57: 3370-3374, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Balsara B. R., Bell D. W., Sonoda G., De Rienzo A., Du Manoir S. Comparative genomic hybridization and loss of heterozygosity analyses identify a common region of deletion at 15q11.1–15 in human malignant mesothelioma. Cancer Res., 59: 450-454, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Cher M. L., Bova G. S., Moore D. H., Small E. J., Carroll P. R., Pin S. S., Epstain J. I., Isaacs W. B., Jensen R. H. Genetic alterations in untreated metastases and androgen-independent prostate cancer detected by comparative genomic hybridization and allelotyping. Cancer Res., 56: 3091-3102, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Cliby W., Ritland S., Hatmann L., Dodson M., Halling C., Keeney G., Podratz C., Jenkins R. B. Human epithelial ovarian cancer allelotype. Cancer Res., 53: 2393-2398, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Wick W., Petersen I., Schmutzler R. K., Wolfarth B., Lenartz D., Bierhoff E., Hümmerich J., Müller D. J., Stangl A. P., Schramm J., Wiestler O. D., von Deimling A. Evidence for a novel tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 15 associated with progression to a metastatic stage in breast cancer. Oncogene, 12: 973-978, 1996.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. R. De Miglio, P. Virdis, D. F. Calvisi, D. Mele, M. R. Muroni, M. Frau, F. Pinna, M. L. Tomasi, M. M. Simile, R. M. Pascale, et al.
Identification and chromosome mapping of loci predisposing to colorectal cancer that control Wnt/{beta}-catenin pathway and progression of early lesions in the rat
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2007; 28(11): 2367 - 2374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
J. Camps, G. Armengol, J. del Rey, J. J. Lozano, H. Vauhkonen, E. Prat, J. Egozcue, L. Sumoy, S. Knuutila, and R. Miro
Genome-wide differences between microsatellite stable and unstable colorectal tumors
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 419 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y.-S. Jou, C.-S. Lee, Y.-H. Chang, C.-F. Hsiao, C.-F. Chen, C.-C. Chao, L. S.H. Wu, S.-H. Yeh, D.-S. Chen, and P.-J. Chen
Clustering of Minimal Deleted Regions Reveals Distinct Genetic Pathways of Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3030 - 3036.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Natrajan, J. Louhelainen, S. Williams, J. Laye, and M. A. Knowles
High-Resolution Deletion Mapping of 15q13.2-q21.1 in Transitional Cell Carcinoma of the Bladder
Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 63(22): 7657 - 7662.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. Beatty, A. Terry, J. MacDonald, E. Gault, S. Cevario, S. J. O'Brien, E. Cameron, and J. C. Neil
Feline Immunodeficiency Virus Integration in B-Cell Lymphoma Identifies a Candidate Tumor Suppressor Gene on Human Chromosome 15q15
Cancer Res., December 15, 2002; 62(24): 7175 - 7180.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Birkenkamp-Demtroder, L. L. Christensen, S. H. Olesen, C. M. Frederiksen, P. Laiho, L. A. Aaltonen, S. Laurberg, F. B. Sorensen, R. Hagemann, and T. F. Orntoft
Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer
Cancer Res., August 1, 2002; 62(15): 4352 - 4363.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
D. B. Zimonjic, J. L. Pollock, P. Westervelt, N. C. Popescu, and T. J. Ley
Acquired, nonrandom chromosomal abnormalities associated with the development of acute promyelocytic leukemia in transgenic mice
PNAS, November 21, 2000; 97(24): 13306 - 13311.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
M. P. de Caestecker, E. Piek, and A. B. Roberts
Role of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling in Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 6, 2000; 92(17): 1388 - 1402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Park, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Park, W. S.
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J. Y.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online