Cancer Research Donn Young  Sign up for Cancer Research eTOC's
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D. M.
[Cancer Research 60, 3290-3298, June 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Inhibition of the Interferon-{gamma}/Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription (STAT) Pathway by Hypermethylation at a STAT-binding Site in the p21WAF1 Promoter Region1

Bin Chen2, Ling He, Van H. Savell, Jesse J. Jenkins and David M. Parham3

Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children’s Hospital, Little Rock, Arkansas 72202 [B. C., L. H., V. H. S., D. M. P.], and Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee 38105 [J. J. J.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Expression of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1 can be up-regulated by activation of signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) proteins in response to IFN-{gamma}. In this study, we examined CpG methylation at the p21WAF1 promoter region in rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) using Southern blot analysis with the methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme HpaII. Sis-inducible element (SIE)-1, a STAT-responsive element located upstream of the p21WAF1 CpG island, was completely methylated at an internal CpG in 13 of 26 (50%) primary RMS tumors and 2 of 5 RMS cell lines. In contrast, all normal tissues examined showed a partial methylation pattern at SIE-1. Complete methylation within SIE-1 strongly correlated with decreased p21WAF1 mRNA expression in RMS. We further studied the effects of SIE-1 hypermethylation on p21WAF1 induction by STAT activation. CpG methylation within SIE-1 significantly inhibited binding of activated STAT1 in electrophoretic mobility shift assays and abrogated STAT-mediated transcription activation in response to IFN-{gamma} in luciferase reporter gene assays. Activation of STAT1 in response to IFN-{gamma} resulted in increased p21WAF1 expression and growth suppression in RMS cells containing unmethylated SIE-1 but failed to induce p21WAF1 or growth inhibition in RD and A673 cells, both of which were completely methylated within SIE-1. However, demethylation at SIE-1, induced by a demethylating agent 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine, reactivated p21WAF1 expression and restored the responsiveness to IFN-{gamma} in RD cells. Our results indicate a mechanism by which altered DNA methylation in the p21WAF1 promoter region, by precluding STAT1 binding to SIE-1, directly inhibits the p21WAF1 induction and cell growth regulation through the IFN-{gamma}/STAT signaling pathway in RMS cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Regulation of cell cycle progression is orchestrated by a family of CDKs,4 which can be negatively regulated by CDK inhibitors, such as p21WAF1 (1, 2, 3) . Increased expression of CDK inhibitors has been recognized as a general mechanism for cell cycle arrest (4 , 5) . Expression of p21WAF1 is induced by wild-type p53 in the presence of DNA damage, leading to apoptosis or cell cycle arrest at the G1 checkpoint (6) . More recent studies show that p21WAF1 expression can be induced through activation of the STAT signal transduction pathway (7) . STATs are a family of latent cytoplasmic proteins that are activated when cells encounter various cytokines and growth factors (7) . The activated STAT proteins dimerize by reciprocal phosphotyrosine interaction in the conserved Src homology 2 domain and enter the nucleus to participate in transcriptional regulation (7) . STAT proteins recognize and bind to the palindromic sequence TTCNNNGAA (8) . Such sequences have been identified in the p21WAF1 promoter region at nt –692, –2557, and –4232 from the transcription start site and designated SIE-1, SIE-2, and SIE-3, respectively (9) . All three SIEs have been shown to bind STAT1, an essential component in the IFN-{gamma} signal transduction pathway (10, 11, 12) . In a number of cell types, activation of STAT1 in response to IFN-{gamma} or other extracellular factors correlates with up-regulation of p21WAF1 expression and inhibition of cell growth (9 , 11 , 12) . However, the role of the IFN-{gamma}/STAT pathway in the growth regulation of soft tissue cancer cells is unclear.

One characteristic of cancer cells is a failure to undergo growth arrest and differentiation. RMS, the most common soft tissue malignancy in childhood, is believed to originate from skeletal muscle precursor cells and is characterized by expression of several well-known myogenic regulatory factors, including MyoD (13) . Although expression of MyoD and other myogenic factors typically correlates with terminal differentiation, untreated RMS cells typically fail to arrest or to differentiate into normal muscle (14) . In RMS cell lines with abnormally low levels of p21WAF1 protein, overexpression of an exogenous p21WAF1 gene results in growth arrest but does not lead to cell differentiation (15 , 16) . These observations suggest that p21WAF1 plays an inhibitory role in the proliferation of RMS cells and that the suppression of p21WAF1 expression may provide an advantage for tumor growth.

Methylation of DNA at the CpG dinucleotides is a postreplication event catalyzed by the DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase (17) , which establishes normal methylation patterns during embryogenesis and reproduces these patterns during replication of adult cells (18 , 19) . DNA methylation, an important mechanism of epigenetic gene regulation, is involved in genomic imprinting, X chromosome inactivation, aging, mutagenesis, regulation of tissue-specific gene expression during development, and latency of viral infection (18 , 20, 21, 22) . Alterations in the normal pattern of DNA methylation, including an overall decrease in the genomic content of the 5'-methylcytosines (23 , 24) and hypermethylation of tumor suppressor genes (25) , are frequently found in cancer cells. For example, hypermethylation at the p16 and p15 CpG islands frequently correlates with loss of gene expression in various malignancies (26, 27, 28, 29) . Previous studies have shown that although decreased p21WAF1 expression is often detected in cancer cells, mutations and allelic loss of the p21WAF1 gene are rarely detected (30 , 31) . In light of our recent findings that altered DNA methylation is present in RMS tumors and that the DNA methyltransferase expression is increased in both embryonal and alveolar subtypes of this cancer (32 , 33) , we hypothesized that abnormal methylation in the p21WAF1 promoter region might play a role in the down-regulation of this gene in RMS cells. We now show that hypermethylation of the p21WAF1 gene at the proximal STAT-binding site, SIE-1, correlates with decreased p21WAF1 expression and inhibits the STAT-mediated induction of p21WAF1 expression in response to IFN-{gamma} in RMS cells. Induced demethylation at SIE-1, on the other hand, reactivates p21WAF1 expression and restores the growth-suppressive effects of IFN-{gamma} in resistant tumor cells that were hypermethylated within SIE-1.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Tumor Specimens and Normal Tissue Samples.
Frozen RMS specimens were obtained from St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital (Memphis, TN) and from a bank of tumor tissues derived from an earlier Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study (14) . All tumor samples were sectioned for histological analysis, and blocks that contained more than 80% tumor cells were used in this study. Normal skeletal muscle samples (from subjects who were 2 months to 16 years of age) were obtained from Departments of Pathology at Arkansas Children’s Hospital and the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (Little Rock, AR). All tumor and normal tissue samples were snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at –80°C until DNA and RNA extraction. Procedures for handling the specimens were in agreement with proper ethical standards and were approved by the Human Research Advisory Committee of the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences.

Cell Culture.
Human RMS cell lines RD, A673, A204, Rh30, and HS729 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC 136-CCL, CRL-1598, CRL-7900, CRL-2061, and HTB-153) and grown in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Human IFN-{gamma} and 5-aza-2'-deoxycitidine (5-aza-CdR) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). To determine STAT activation and p21WAF1 induction, cells were incubated in 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} for 1 h to 4 days. The 5-aza-CdR treatment was performed as described previously (34 , 35) . Cells were incubated in 0.3, 0.5, 1, 2, or 3 µM 5-aza-CdR for 1–3 days and then in normal medium for 3 days. At the end of each treatment, cells were trypsinized and divided for extraction of nuclear proteins and total RNA. To determine the effects of 5-aza-CdR on cell proliferation, RD cells were plated in 96-well plates (1 x 104 cells/well), treated with various concentrations of 5-aza-CdR for 48 h, and then cultured for 1–4 days in normal medium or medium containing 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}. Cell proliferation was assessed with a cell proliferation assay kit (Promega, Madison, WI) and detected with a SpectraMax 250 plate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA).

Methylation Analysis with Southern Blot.
The Southern blot methylation analysis was performed as described previously (32) . Genomic DNA was extracted from tumor and normal tissue specimens with the Puregene DNA extraction kit (Gentra Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). DNA (5 µg) was digested with 40 units of MspI or HpaII (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at 37°C for 16 h, followed by an additional 10 units of each enzyme for 8 h. The digested DNA fragments were separated by electrophoresis in 1.2% agarose gels and blotted onto Hybond plus nylon membrane (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Arlington Heights, IL) overnight. Hybridization probes U12 (nt –786 to –387), U37 (nt –161 to 518), and U64 (nt –571 to 518) were prepared by PCR amplification and subcloning into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Approximately 100 ng of the plasmid insert DNA were 32P-labeled by random priming. All hybridizations were performed in 2x Denhardt’s solution, 100 µg/ml denatured salmon sperm DNA, and 6x SSC at 65°C for 24 h. Washing was performed at 65°C in 3x, 2x, 1x, 0.5x, and 0.1x SSC, each for 1 h. Blots were then exposed to X-ray film at –80°C for 16–72 h. The degree of CpG methylation at SIE-1 was determined by quantifying the intensity of the 808-bp methylation fragment relative to the 496-bp unmethylated band with a Cyclone phosphorimager (Packard, Meriden, CT).

RPA.
Total RNA was extracted with the Purescript RNA extraction kit (Gentra). RNA concentration was determined by spectrophotometry. PCR primers p21F (5'-GGG GAC AGC AGA GGA AGA C-3') and p21R (5'-CGG CGT TTG GAG TGG TAG A-3'), synthesized based on the published p21WAF1 mRNA sequence (GenBank accession no. U03106), were used to generate a 159-bp fragment using Rh30 cDNA as a template. A 169-bp ß-actin cDNA fragment was also generated as the internal control. The fragments were subcloned into the pCR2.1 vector by TA cloning. Inserts were sequenced to assess orientation and to eliminate any clones with mutations attributable to subcloning. Antisense probes for RPA were generated by linearizing the plasmid with HindIII and using a T7 polymerase in vitro transcription kit (Ambion, Austin, TX) in the presence of [{alpha}-32P]UTP. Probes were purified by gel electrophoresis. Duplex RPA reactions using probes for p21WAF1 and ß-actin were performed with an RPA III kit (Ambion), as recommended by the manufacturer. At least 1 µg of total RNA was used in each reaction. Electrophoresis was performed in 5% polyacrylamide/8 M urea gels. The intensity of the p21WAF1 and the ß-actin band was quantified with a Cyclone phosphorimager (Packard), and the ratio was determined for each reaction. The mean p21WAF1/ß-actin ratio (arbitrarily set as 100%) and the SE in the normal muscle samples were used to assess levels of p21WAF1 expression in the tumors. Normalized values below 3 SE were considered to be decreased expression.

Direct Sequencing Analysis.
Genomic regions containing exons 1, 2, and 3 of the p21WAF1 gene were amplified with primers U3 (5'-AGG TGC TCC AGG TGC TTC-3') and U7 (5'-ACT TGT AAT CCC GCT CTC C-3'), primers E2F (5'-TGA GGT GAC ACA GCA AAG-3') and E2R (GAG AAT CCT GGT CCC TTA C-3'), and primers E3F (5'-GGT GCG GTG ATG GAT AAA-3') and E3R (5'-GAC TAA GGC AGA AGA TGT A-3'), respectively. The PCR products were directly sequenced with the fmol cycle sequencing system (Promega, Madison, WI). The sequencing reactions were analyzed using a 6% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The gels were transferred onto blotting paper, dried, and exposed to Hyperfilm-MP (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) for 2–4 h at –80°C.

EMSA.
Nuclear extracts were prepared as described (36) and quantified with the Bradford method. To prepare the double-strand oligonucleotides used as probes or competitors in EMSA, sense and antisense strands of the oligonucleotides were synthesized separately (Integrated DNA Technologies, Coralville, IA), annealed to complimentary strands, electrophoresed in polyacrylamide gel, and then purified (36) . The methylated SIE-1 (Met-SIE-1) oligonucleotide was prepared by incubating 20 µg of unmethylated SIE-1 (UM-SIE-1) with 80 units of SssI CpG methylase (New England Biolabs) for 4 h at 37°C. Then the reaction was heated at 65°C for 30 min to inactivate the methylase, purified by PAGE, and concentrated with Centricon 3 microconcentrators (Amicon, Danvers, MA). EMSA probes were prepared by end labeling each double-strand oligonucleotide with [{gamma}-32P]ATP, and portions equivalent to 20,000 cpm were used in each reaction. Binding reactions were performed in a total volume of 20 µl in 10 mM Hepes (pH 7.9), 80 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 5% glycerol, and 50 µg/ml double-strand salmon sperm DNA. Nuclear extracts (2 µg/reaction) were incubated for 15 min on ice in the presence or absence of unlabeled competitor oligonucleotides, followed by addition of the end-labeled probe and a 15-min incubation on ice. Supershift reactions were performed by incubating an antibody against STAT1 or an antibody against STAT3 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) with nuclear proteins for 1 h at room temperature prior to addition of the 32P-labeled probe. The samples were fractionated in native 4.5% polyacrylamide gels at 160 V for 2 h in 0.25x Tris-borate EDTA. After electrophoresis, the gel was transferred to 3 MM paper, dried, and exposed to X-ray films. DNA-protein complexes were quantified by phosphorimaging.

Reporter Constructs, Transient Transfection, and Luciferase Assay.
Various lengths of the p21WAF1 5'-end region were amplified by PCR and subcloned into the pCR2.1 vector (Invitrogen). The sequences of the inserts and their orientations were examined by direct sequencing analysis. The reporter constructs were prepared by excising the p21WAF1 inserts from the pCR2.1 vector and subcloning into the pGL3-basic reporter plasmid (Promega), followed by standard CsCl purification. The methylated plasmids (Met-pGL3-U12 and Met-pGL3-basic) were obtained by incubating 40 µg of CsCl-purified plasmid DNA with 100 units SssI CpG methylase (New England BioLabs) and S-adenosylmethionine according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The constructs were then precipitated by ethanol and resuspended in 1x Tris-EDTA. Complete CpG methylation of the plasmid DNA was confirmed by HpaII digestion and gel electrophoresis. The final concentration of the methylated plasmids was determined by comparing to the CsCl-purified pGL3-U12 and pGL3-basic by electrophoresis in an ethidium bromide-stained agarose gel. Twenty-four h prior to transfection, approximately 1 x 105 cells HeLa cells (ATCC) cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc.) were plated in 12-well culture plates. Cells were transfected with 2 µg of pGL3 reporter plasmid and 50 ng of the pSEAP control plasmid (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) using Transfast (Promega) in a 1:1 ratio. Forty-eight h after transfection, the medium was removed, and cells were incubated for additional 6 h in fresh medium in the absence or presence of 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}. Then, the cells were harvested and assayed for luciferase activity using the LucLite luciferase assay kit (Packard). Transfection efficiency was normalized relative to the SEAP activity determined in the culture medium. Each experiment was repeated at least twice in triplicate, and the variation between experiments was less than 15%.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Methylation State of the SIE-1 Element.
We first examined normal tissue and RMS samples for methylation alteration in a 1.5-kb p21WAF1 upstream region, using Southern blot analysis with a methylation-sensitive restriction enzyme HpaII and its methylation-insensitive isozyme MspI. This region contains an approximate 1-kb stretch upstream of the p21WAF1 transcription start site, the entire exon 1, and part of intron 1 (Fig. 1ACitation ). A CpG site at nt –692 relative to the transcription start site, located within a previously identified STAT-binding site SIE-1 (5'-CTTCCCGGAAG-3'; Ref. 9 ), was present in both unmethylated and methylated states in all normal tissues, including skeletal muscle (n = 34), heart (n = 5), lung (n = 6), liver (n = 8), kidney (n = 5), pancreas (n = 5), spleen (n = 5), and peripheral lymphocytes (n = 26). This "incomplete" methylation pattern was indicated by the presence of both an 808-bp fragment attributable to CpG methylation at nt –692 and a 496-bp fragment that was a result of unmethylated CpG sites at nt –692 and –196 on Southern blot (Fig. 1BCitation ). The degree of methylation at this CpG site, as evaluated by the intensity of the 808-bp methylation fragment relative to the 496-bp unmethylated band, was consistent within each tissue type but varied among different tissue types, ranging from 2.7:1 in lung to 1:15 in liver (Fig. 1BCitation ). In the normal skeletal muscle samples, the ratio of methylated to unmethylated SIE-1 was 3.1–3.5:1 (Fig. 1CCitation ). The other HpaII sites in the 1.5-kb region, including 11 sites clustered in the CpG-rich region surrounding the p21WAF1 exon 1, were unmethylated in all normal tissues examined in this study (data not shown).



View larger version (49K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Hypermethylation at nt –692 within the SIE-1 site in the p21WAF1 promoter region. A, representation of the p21WAF1 5' region showing the MspI/HpaII restriction sites, numbered relative to the transcription start site. Exon 1 is represented by the filled rectangle. U12, U64, and U37 are hybridization probes located at nt –786 to –387, nt –571 to 518, and nt –161 to 518, respectively. B–D, Southern blot with MspI (M) or HpaII (H) digestion, using probe U12 in hybridizations. B, incomplete CpG methylation at nt –692 in normal tissues, evidenced by presence of the 808- and 496-bp fragments. One example is shown for each tissue type. C, complete methylation at nt –692 in primary embryonal RMSs (ERMS) and alveolar RMSs (ARMS). Tumors E4, E7, and A12 are examples of complete CpG methylation at nt –692. D, methylation within SIE-1 in RMS cell lines. All blots were probed sequentially with multiple overlapping hybridization probes. The 808-bp methylation fragment was detected whether U12 or U64 was used as a probe but not when probe U37 was used in hybridization.

 
Hypermethylation of the CpG site at nt –692 within the SIE-1 element was detected both in primary RMS tumors and in RMS cell lines. Using the Southern blot method, we examined the methylation status of the p21WAF1 upstream region in 26 primary tumors, of which 14 were the embryonal subtype and 12 were the alveolar subtype. In 13 tumors (8 embryonal and 5 alveolar), only the 808-bp fragment was present, and the 495-bp fragment was undetectable, indicating that the CpG site within SIE-1 was completely methylated (Fig. 1CCitation ). The rest of the tumors (6 embryonal and 7 alveolar) showed the incomplete methylation pattern similar to that of normal skeletal muscle. In addition, we examined five RMS cell lines (A204, RD, A673, Rh30, and HS729), for CpG methylation in the p21WAF1 upstream region. Complete methylation at SIE-1 was found in RD and A673, whereas A204, Rh30, and HS729 cells contained both unmethylated and methylated CpG site within SIE-1 (Fig. 1CCitation ). The hypermethylated CpG within SIE-1, which was found in a relatively CpG-sparse region upstream of the p21WAF1 CpG island, was the only methylation alteration identified in this study. No alteration of CpG methylation pattern was detected in the primary RMS samples or in the RMS cell lines with regard to the downstream HpaII sites that span the CpG-rich region of the p21WAF1 gene (not shown).

Correlation between SIE-1 Methylation and the p21WAF1 mRNA Expression in RMS.
To determine whether the aberrant CpG methylation in the p21WAF1 promoter region correlates with decreased p21WAF1 expression in RMS tumors, we analyzed levels of the p21WAF1 mRNA transcripts in the same set of tumor and normal muscle samples using RPA. Levels of the p21WAF1 mRNA were normalized to an internal standard ß-actin, and decreased expression was defined as less than 3 SE of the mean expression level in the normal muscle samples. All 13 tumors with completely methylated SIE-1 showed decreased p21WAF1 expression; in contrast, decreased p21WAF1 expression was detected in only one of the six embryonal tumors and none of the seven alveolar tumors with incomplete SIE-1 methylation. The correlation between SIE-1 hypermethylation and decreased p21WAF1 expression in RMS tumors is summarized in Table 1Citation , with representative RPA results shown in Fig. 2Citation . Compared to the mean expression in normal muscle, the average p21WAF1 levels were significantly lower in both tumor subtypes with complete methylation at SIE-1, whereas the difference between the incompletely methylated tumors and normal muscle was not statistically significant (Table 1)Citation . Consistent with the results from the primary tumor samples, decreased p21WAF1 expression was observed in RD and A673, the two cell lines with complete methylation at SIE-1 (Fig. 2DCitation ). Of the five RMS cell lines examined, Rh30, an alveolar RMS cell line with the least degree of CpG methylation at SIE-1, showed the highest p21WAF1 expression (Fig. 2DCitation ). These results indicated that complete CpG methylation within SIE-1 strongly correlated with decreased constitutive expression of p21WAF1 in RMS cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Correlation between complete CpG methylation within the SIE-1 in the p21WAF1 promoter and decreased p21WAF1 mRNA expression in RMSs

 


View larger version (46K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Expression of p21WAF1 mRNA, assessed by RPA using probes for p21WAF1 and ß-actin. A, normal skeletal muscle; B, embryonal RMSs (ERMS); C, alveolar RMSs (ARMS); D, RMS cell lines. The 159-bp p21WAF1 fragment and the 169-bp ß-actin fragment were quantified by phosphorimaging, and the mean p21WAF1/ß-actin ratio of the normal muscle samples was arbitrarily set as 100%. The p21WAF1 expression in tumors was normalized to the mean ratio of the normal muscle, and normalized values below 3 SE were considered to indicate decreased expression. The normalized p21WAF1 mRNA levels are shown below the gels, with decreased expression indicated by asterisks.

 
Mutation and Polymorphism Analysis.
To verify the correlation between SIE-1 methylation and decreased p21WAF1 expression, we examined the p21WAF1 coding region from all tumors for mutations and polymorphisms by direct sequencing. No mutation was detected in any of the tumors, nor was a correlation found between p21WAF1 expression and the presence of the codon 31 C -> A variant or the C -> T variant at the 20th bp after the stop codon. These results further supported an epigenetic mechanism for the decreased p21WAF1 expression in RMSs.

CpG Methylation within SIE-1 Inhibits DNA Binding of STAT1.
Abnormal CpG methylation in the promoter region, when present within regulatory elements, could potentially interfere with binding of specific transcription factors that recognize these motifs (37) . To determine whether CpG methylation within SIE-1 interferes with STAT binding, we compared the STAT binding abilities of a 27-bp oligonucleotide (nt –703 to –677) containing SIE-1 in the unmethylated (UM-SIE-1) and methylated (Met-SIE-1) forms, using EMSA. We first examined the abilities of UM-SIE-1 and Met-SIE-1 to compete with a STAT consensus sequence S1 (8) in binding to activated STAT proteins, using competition EMSA reactions with nuclear proteins from RD cells treated with 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} for 24 h (Fig. 3ACitation ). Activation of STAT1 was induced by IFN-{gamma}, as indicated by the diminished DNA-protein complex and the formation of a supershift band when an antibody against STAT1 was added to the reaction (Fig. 3ACitation , Lane 15). The addition of an antibody against STAT3 had no effect on complex formation (Fig. 3ACitation , Lane 16), indicating that STAT3 was not activated. In competition EMSA reactions, addition of 100-fold excess of unlabeled S1 or UM-SIE-1 inhibited complex formation on an equimolar basis, suggesting that the unmethylated SIE-1 binds activated STAT1 as strongly as the S1 consensus sequence (Fig. 3ACitation , Lanes 3–6). However, addition of the same amount (100-fold excess) of unlabeled Met-SIE-1 resulted in lesser inhibition of DNA-protein complex formation. Under identical conditions, similar inhibition was observed when the Met-SIE-1 competitor was increased to 500-fold excess (Fig. 3ACitation , Lanes 7–9). Similar results were observed by using nuclear proteins from IFN-{gamma}-treated A673 or A204 cells or by substituting the S1 probe with a high-affinity STAT-binding probe M67 (38) in the reactions (not shown). We then directly compared the abilities of unmethylated and methylated SIE-1 to bind activated STAT1 in EMSA reactions, using 32P-labeled UM-SIE-1 or Met-SIE-1 probes prepared to have equal specific activities (Fig. 3BCitation ). Nuclear proteins from RD cells treated with 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} for 1 h to 4 days were used in these reactions. Binding of STAT1 to UM-SIE-1 was observed throughout the IFN-{gamma} treatment (Fig. 3BCitation , Lanes 1–6). In contrast, binding of activated STAT1 to the methylated SIE-1 probe was significantly inhibited. Under identical conditions, the STAT complexes formed with Met-SIE-1 were in average 5.2 times less intense than with the UM-SIE-1 probe (Fig. 3BCitation , Lanes 7–12). EMSA reactions using nuclear proteins from IFN-{gamma}-treated A673 or A204 cells yielded similar results (not shown). Therefore, CpG methylation within SIE-1 significantly inhibited binding of activated STAT1 to this site.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. CpG methylation within SIE-1 inhibited binding of activated STAT1. A, competition EMSA with the 32P-labeled S1 probe (5'-GTT GTT CCG GGA AAA TT-3'; Ref. 38 ). Two µg of nuclear proteins from RD cells treated with IFN-{gamma} were used in Lanes 2–16, whereas no nuclear protein was added in Lane 1. In Lanes 3–13, excess amounts of unlabeled S1, UM-SIE-1 (5'-TCC CTC CTT CCC GGA AGC ATG TGA CAA-3'), Met-SIE-1, M67 (5'-GTC GAC ATT TCC CGT AAA TCA T-3'; Ref. 38 ), or an unrelated oligonucleotide ETS-1 (5'-AGG CCA AGC CGG AAG TGT GTG-3'; Ref. 54 ) were added as specific competitors. Lanes 14–16, EMSA reactions with an antibody against STAT1 (anti-STAT1) added in Lane 15 and a STAT3 antibody (anti-STAT3) in Lane 16. SS, supershift complex; NC, nonspecific complex. B, comparison of the STAT binding abilities of the unmethylated SIE-1 (UM-SIE-1) and the methylated SIE-1 (Met-SIE-1) probes. EMSA reactions were performed with nuclear proteins (2 µg/reaction) from RD cells treated with IFN-{gamma} for the indicated time. Each probe was end-labeled with [{gamma}-32P]ATP under identical conditions, diluted to have equal specific activities, and used in an amount equivalent to 20,000 cpm in each reaction.

 
CpG Methylation Inhibits STAT-mediated Transcription Activation.
To further investigate the role of SIE-1 methylation on STAT-mediated transcription activation, we studied the effect of CpG methylation on the promoter activity of the p21WAF1 upstream region with a luciferase reporter gene assay. HeLa cells were used in these experiments because of the demonstrated STAT1 activation (11) and high transfection efficiency. Cells were transiently transfected with reporter constructs containing various length of the p21WAF1 promoter region, incubated in the presence or absence of IFN-{gamma}, and analyzed for luciferase activity (Fig. 4Citation ). IFN-{gamma} induced promoter activities of the constructs containing the SIE-1 site. As shown in Fig. 4Citation , the promoter activity of two SIE-1-containing constructs, pGL3-U18 and pGL3-U12, increased by 3- and 2.8-fold, respectively, with the IFN-{gamma} treatment. Removal of the SIE-1 site from the reporter construct (pGL3-U68) virtually eliminated the response to IFN-{gamma} stimulation, indicating that SIE-1 was an essential cis-acting element for IFN-{gamma}-induced activation of the p21WAF1 promoter. We then determined the promoter activity of the SssI-modified reporter construct pGL3-U12, because the CpG dinucleotide within SIE-1 is the only CpG in the U12 fragment. CpG methylation of pGL3-U12 (Met-pGL3-U12) reduced its promoter activity by an average of 66% (P < 0.001, Student’s t test) and completely inhibited the induction of transcription activation by IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 4Citation ). In contrast, methylation of the control plasmid (Met-pGL3-basic) resulted in less than 12% decrease of the average luciferase activity, a loss that was statistically insignificant (P > 0.05, Student’s t test). These results suggested that decreased STAT-binding to methylated SIE-1 inhibited STAT-mediated transcriptional activation.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. CpG methylation inhibited the p21WAF1 promoter activity. The p21WAF1 promoter region and structure of several reporter constructs are shown schematically. The position of the SIE-1 site is indicated by a vertical bar. HeLa cells were transiently transfected with 2 µg of the indicated reporter construct, incubated with or without 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}, and analyzed for luciferase activity. Promoter activity was expressed relative to that of the empty pGL3-basic plasmid after normalization to the co-transfected SEAP activity. *, statistically significant differences (Student’s t test, P < 0.01). Error bars, SE. Each experiment was repeated at least twice in triplicate, and the variation between experiments was less than 15%.

 
Hypermethylation within SIE-1 Inhibits STAT-mediated p21WAF1 Induction and Growth Regulation.
Activation of STAT1 in response to IFN-{gamma} and other extracellular factors has been correlated with induction of p21WAF1 mRNA expression and cell growth suppression (9 , 11 , 12) . In light of the results described above, we hypothesized that hypermethylation within SIE-1 could result in deficient STAT-mediated up-regulation of p21WAF1 expression and resistance to the antiproliferative effects of IFN-{gamma} in RMS cells. To test this hypothesis, we studied STAT activation, p21WAF1 expression, and cell growth response in RD, A673, and A204 cells treated with 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} for 1 h to 3 days. Using EMSA, STAT activation was detected in all three cell lines, evidenced by the presence of the STAT complexes in all treated cells (Fig. 5ACitation ). We then performed RPA analysis to determine the induction of the p21WAF1 mRNA expression by IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 5BCitation ). IFN-{gamma}-treated A204 cells showed significantly increased p21WAF1 expression. As shown in Fig. 5BCitation , the increase of the p21WAF1 expression was 4.5-fold after a 6-h IFN-{gamma} treatment and 3.4-fold after a 1-day treatment. In contrast, in RD and A673 cells, both of which were completely methylated within SIE-1, no increase of p21WAF1 expression was induced at any time of IFN-{gamma} treatment (Fig. 5BCitation ). To determine whether induction of p21WAF1 correlated with suppression of cell growth, we analyzed the growth responses of A204, RD, and A673 cells to IFN-{gamma} treatment. The growth of A204 cells was inhibited by IFN-{gamma} treatment, whereas RD and A673 cells were resistant to the treatment and continued to proliferate in the presence of IFN-{gamma} (Fig. 6Citation ). Thus, p21WAF1 induction and cell growth suppression correlated with STAT activation in A204 cells, which contained unmethylated SIE-1; however, the responses to IFN-{gamma} were inhibited in RD and A673 cells because of complete methylation within SIE-1.



View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Methylation within SIE-1 inhibited STAT-mediated p21WAF1 induction in response to IFN-{gamma}. Nuclear proteins and total RNA were harvested from RD, A673, and A204 cells treated for 1 h to 4 days with 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}. A, activation of STAT1 detected by EMSA using a 32P-labeled S1 probe. Two µg of nuclear proteins were used in Lanes 2–15, whereas no nuclear protein was added in Lane 1. B, induction of p21WAF1 mRNA by IFN-{gamma}, assessed by RPA. Levels of the p21WAF1 expression were normalized to the internal control ß-actin, and the fold increases of p21WAF1 mRNA were determined relative to that in the untreated cells. No increase in p21WAF1 expression was observed in RD and A673 cells after IFN-{gamma} treatment, whereas induction of p21WAF1 mRNA was detected in A204 cells in response to IFN-{gamma}.

 


View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Growth curves of RD cells (A), A673 cells (B), and A204 cells (C) in the presence (——) or absence (- - - - -) of 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}. Cell counts were determined with the trypan blue dye exclusion method. Data points, averages of triplicate determinations. Significant difference in cell growth was found between IFN-{gamma}-treated and untreated A204 cells (P < 0.001 by Student’s t test), whereas no difference was found between IFN-{gamma}-treated and untreated RD or A673 cells (P > 0.05 by Student’s t test).

 
Demethylation at SIE-1 Reactivates p21WAF1 Expression and Restores the Responsiveness to IFN-{gamma}.
To verify the role of SIE-1 methylation status in transcriptional regulation of the p21WAF1 gene and to explore the potential therapeutic significance of this finding, we studied the methylation status of SIE-1, p21WAF1 expression, and cell proliferation in RD cells treated with various concentrations of 5-aza-CdR for 1–3 days. Southern blot analysis indicated that 5-aza-CdR induced demethylation at the SIE-1 site, evidenced by the appearance of the 496-bp fragment upon HpaII digestion (Fig. 7ACitation ). Demethylation at SIE-1 resulted in significantly increased p21WAF1 expression, which was further induced by IFN-{gamma} in the 5-aza-CdR-treated RD cells (Fig. 7BCitation ). The effect of the demethylation treatment on cell growth was determined with a cell proliferation assay, which measured the growth responses of 5-aza-CdR-treated and control RD cells to IFN-{gamma}. IFN-{gamma} did not affect the proliferation of control RD cells but did result in growth inhibition of the 5-aza-CdR-treated RD cells (Fig. 8Citation ). The differences in cell proliferation rate between RD cells treated with 5-aza-CdR only and those treated with 5-aza-CdR followed by IFN-{gamma} were statistically significant (Fig. 8Citation ). Therefore, induced demethylation at SIE-1 by 5-aza-CdR reactivated p21WAF1 expression and restored the responsiveness to IFN-{gamma} in the previously resistant RD cells.



View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Effects of 5-aza-CdR treatment on SIE-1 methylation, p21WAF1 expression, and responsiveness to IFN-{gamma} in RD cells. A, Southern blot with MspI (M) or HpaII (H) digestion, using probe U12 in the hybridizations. The concentrations and durations of the 5-aza-CdR treatment are indicated above the blot. UT, untreated RD cells as controls. The appearance of the 496-bp fragment after 5-aza-CdR treatment indicates demethylation at SIE-1. B, p21WAF1 mRNA expression and induction by IFN-{gamma} in RD cells treated with 5-aza-CdR, assessed by RNase protection. The level of p21WAF1 expression was normalized to the internal control ß-actin. The fold increase of p21WAF1 mRNA relative to that in the untreated RD cells is indicated. The increases of the p21WAF1 mRNA levels after 5-aza-CdR treatment and the induction of the p21WAF1 expression by IFN-{gamma} stimulation were both statistically significant (P < 0.001 by Student’s t test).

 


View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. Restoration of the growth-inhibitory effect of IFN-{gamma} in RD cells after 5-aza-CdR treatment. Cells were treated with 5-aza-CdR for 48 h, incubated in medium with or without 100 ng/ml IFN-{gamma}, and assayed for cell proliferation by measuring the production of the formazan dye in living cells using absorbance at 490 nm. Statistically significant differences in cell proliferation rate were found between control and 5-aza-CdR-treated RD cells, between control cells and cells treated with 5-aza-CdR followed by IFN-{gamma}, and between cells treated with IFN-{gamma} only and those with 5-aza-CdR followed by IFN-{gamma} (Student’s t test). Data points, averages of eight determinations.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
Our results indicate that hypermethylation within the SIE-1 element in the p21WAF1 promoter region not only strongly correlates with decreased constitutive p21WAF1 expression but also affects IFN-{gamma}-induced expression of the p21WAF1 mRNA in RMS cells. Expression of the p21WAF1 gene is regulated by p53-dependent and p53-independent mechanisms (30) . MyoD, a basic helix-loop-helix protein, activates p21WAF1 expression in a p53-independent pathway and induces cell cycle withdrawal during normal muscle differentiation, a process accompanied by down-regulation of the activity of CDKs (39 , 40) . Previous studies have indicated that both the p53-dependent and the MyoD-mediated pathways of p21WAF1 induction are inactivated in RMS cells (15) . Our study shows that complete CpG methylation at nt –692 in the SIE-1 element is a frequent occurrence in both the embryonal and the alveolar subtypes of RMS tumors. CpG methylation within SIE-1 inhibited binding of activated STAT1, resulting in abrogation of the STAT-mediated induction of p21WAF1 expression and the growth suppression in response to IFN-{gamma}. More importantly, induced demethylation at SIE-1 by 5-aza-CdR treatment reactivated p21WAF1 expression and restored cellular responsiveness to IFN-{gamma}. Although it is unclear whether a decrease in p21WAF1 expression contributes to tumor progression in vivo, our findings have demonstrated that altered DNA methylation is a new mechanism for down-regulation of the p21WAF1 expression in RMS cells.

In our study, hypermethylation was detected at a single CpG site within SIE-1, which is present in a subregion with very few other CpG sites upstream of the p21WAF1 CpG island. Previous studies have shown that methylation affects promoter regions with and without CpG islands in a differential manner (25 , 41) . Except for X-linked inactivated genes and autosomal imprinted genes, promoters that contain CpG islands are virtually always unmethylated in normal tissues. It has been well established that hypermethylation of promoter CpG islands leads to inactivation of tumor suppressor genes in cancer cells, as demonstrated by inactivation of the VHL gene caused by regional hypermethylation in renal carcinoma (42) . In contrast, CpG sites in promoter regions without CpG islands are variably methylated in normal cells, often in tissue-specific patterns that reflect the transcription status of the gene (41) . In these promoter regions, methylation of specific CpG sites in or near transcription regulatory motifs can block accessibility of the transcription factors. For example, a SnaBI CpG site in the IFN-{gamma} gene promoter was completely methylated in neonatal T cells and thymocytes that had low or undetectable IFN-{gamma} expression but was substantially hypomethylated in adult T cells with greater levels of IFN-{gamma} mRNA in response to activation (43 , 44) . In vitro methylation of this SnaBI CpG site, which was found within a regulatory element critical for IFN-{gamma} gene transcription, was shown to block binding of nuclear proteins in IFN-{gamma}-expressing T cells (44) . Recently, several groups have reported that site-specific methylation alterations may result in perturbed gene expression in cancer cells by affecting binding of transcription factors. Hypermethylation at cAMP-responsive element in the promoter regions of BRCA1 and NF1 inhibits binding of the cAMP-responsive element binding protein (37 , 45) . Similarly, CpG methylation within the ATF-like and the RBF1 recognition sites in the Rb1 promoter region prevents binding of these factors and results in decreased Rb expression (46) . In our study, hypermethylation within the SIE-1 element resulted in reduced STAT1 binding, leading to inhibition of the STAT-mediated induction of the p21WAF1 expression. These results not only support the notion that methylation alteration within regulatory elements in non-CpG island regions can directly affect transcription regulation but also demonstrate that altered DNA methylation can directly impair signal transduction in cancer cells.

Our study indicates that the CpG dinucleotide within SIE-1 is maintained at a partially methylated state in normal tissues in a tissue-specific pattern. In RMS cells, hypermethylation within SIE-1 reflects a gain in the degree of methylation at this CpG site. It is not known how methylation patterns at this CpG site were established for different cell types during development, nor is it clear to what degree the specific methylation patterns are involved in regulating p21WAF1 expression in normal tissues. Although complete CpG methylation within SIE-1 strongly correlates with decreased constitutive p21WAF1 expression in RMS cells, it is unlikely that transcription abrogation is caused by altered methylation of a single CpG located at 692 bp upstream from the transcription start site. The 11 HpaII sites spanning the p21WAF1 CpG island are invariably unmethylated both in normal tissues and in RMS cells; however, because Southern blot analysis examines only a portion of the CpG sites in the p21WAF1 promoter, it is possible that abnormal methylation is present at additional, non-HpaII CpG sites in this region. To put the methylation alteration at SIE-1 into a more defined context, future studies are necessary to determine the complete CpG methylation profile of the p21WAF1 upstream region. It is also possible that other epigenetic mechanisms, such as changes in histone acetylation and heterochromatin structure, are involved in regulating p21WAF1 expression. Therefore, although our study indicates a strong correlation between hypermethylation within SIE-1 and decreased constitutive p21WAF1 expression in primary RMS tumors, the role of CpG methylation in p21WAF1 transcription regulation merits further elucidation.

SIE-1 is the most proximal STAT-binding site among the three SIE elements in the p21WAF1 promoter region and is likely the only one directly affected by abnormal DNA methylation, because SIE-2 and SIE-3 do not contain CpG dinucleotides (9) . STAT1 was shown to bind all three SIEs in in vitro protein-DNA binding experiments (9) ; however, how these SIE sites interact with activated STAT1 in vivo is unknown. Our study indicates that deficient protein binding to SIE-1 caused by hypermethylation is sufficient to inhibit the STAT1-mediated transcriptional activation of p21WAF1. These results have raised questions such as whether SIE-2 and SIE-3 bind activated STAT1 in vivo and how they function in the presence of hypermethylated SIE-1. Further investigation is needed to elucidate the relationship of all three SIE elements to the STAT-mediated p21WAF1 up-regulation.

Regulation of p21WAF1 expression through methylation of a STAT-binding site adds a new facet to our understanding of the interplay between DNA methylation, cell cycle control, and tumor progression. p21WAF1 has been shown to form quaternary complexes with cyclin, CDK, and the proliferating cell nuclear antigen and to function as a negative regulator of cell proliferation by inhibiting CDK activity and blocking the G1-S transition (2 , 47) . On the other hand, p21WAF1 might also negatively regulate DNA methylation, as it was shown to compete with DNA (cytosine-5)-methyltransferase for binding to proliferating cell nuclear antigen (48) , thus antagonizing the DNA methyltransferase function. Our results indicate that the p21WAF1 gene is subject to methylation regulation at the transcription level and is a target of aberrant methylation in RMS cells. Decreased p21WAF1 expression has been found in a number of human cancers and appears to be associated with a more aggressive phenotype of malignant melanoma (49, 50, 51, 52, 53) ; therefore, the role of abnormal p21WAF1 methylation in the development and/or progression of these tumors is an intriguing question. Furthermore, our findings may have important therapeutic implications, because 5-aza-CdR treatment reactivates p21WAF1 expression and restores the responsiveness to STAT activation by inducing demethylation at SIE-1 in tumor cells that were resistant to IFN-{gamma}. The possible application of this observation to cancer chemotherapy deserves further exploration.


    ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 
We thank Drs. Marie Chow and Teresita Bellido for critical reading of the manuscript and helpful discussions, William M. Crist for review of the manuscript, the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group and its participants for contribution of tumor tissue, Charlotte A. Peterson and Jane M. Taylor for help on the reporter gene assays, and Laurie E. Smith for secretarial assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Arkansas Science and Technology Authority Grant 98-B-34, American Cancer Society Institutional Research Grant IRG-91-012-06, National Cancer Institute Grants P30 CA217657 and 5 U10 CA24507–09, the American Lebanese-Syrian Associated Charities, and the Sam Walton and Ed Harms Research Awards from the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences Medical Research Endowment Fund. Back

2 Current address: Division of Laboratory Systems, Public Health Practice Program Office, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway, N.E., Mailstop G25, Atlanta, GA 30341. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Slot 820, Arkansas Children’s Hospital, 800 Marshall Street, Little Rock, AR 72202. Phone: (501) 320-1307; Fax: (501) 320-3912; E-mail: WBMX95A{at}prodigy.com Back

4 The abbreviations used are: CDK, cyclin-dependent kinase; STAT, signal transducers and activators of transcription; RMS, rhabdomyosarcoma; RPA, RNase protection assay; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay; SIE, sis-inducible element; 5-aza-CdR, 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine; nt, nucleotide(s); SEAP, secreted alkaline phosphatase. Back

Received 11/ 3/99. Accepted 4/10/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
 REFERENCES
 

  1. el-Deiry W. S., Tokino T., Velculescu V. E., Levy D. B., Parsons R., Trent J. M., Lin D., Mercer W. E., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. WAF1, a potential mediator of p53 tumor suppression. Cell, 75: 817-825, 1993.[Medline]
  2. Harper J. W., Adami G. R., Wei N., Keyomarsi K., Elledge S. J. The p21 Cdk-interacting protein Cip1 is a potent inhibitor of G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Cell, 75: 805-816, 1993.[Medline]
  3. Gu Y., Turck C. W., Morgan D. O. Inhibition of CDK2 activity in vivo by an associated 20K regulatory subunit. Nature (Lond.), 366: 707-710, 1993.[Medline]
  4. Hunter T. Braking the cycle. Cell, 75: 839-841, 1993.[Medline]
  5. Sherr C. J., Roberts J. M. Inhibitors of mammalian G1 cyclin-dependent kinases. Genes Dev., 9: 1149-1163, 1995.[Free Full Text]
  6. el-Deiry W. S., Harper J. W., O’Connor P. M., Velculescu V. E., Canman C. E., Jackman J., Pietenpol J. A., Burrell M., Hill D. E., Wang Y., Wiman K. G., Mercer W. E., Kastan M. B., Kohn K. W., Elledge S. J., Kinzler K. W., Volgelstein B. WAF1/CIP1 is induced in p53-mediated G1 arrest and apoptosis. Cancer Res., 54: 1169-1174, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Darnell J. E., Jr. STATs and gene regulation. Science (Washington DC), 277: 1630-1635, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Horvath C. M., Wen Z., Darnell J. E., Jr. A STAT protein domain that determines DNA sequence recognition suggests a novel DNA-binding domain. Genes Dev., 9: 984-994, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Chin Y. E., Kitagawa M., Su W. C., You Z. H., Iwamoto Y., Fu X. Y. Cell growth arrest and induction of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 WAF1/CIP1 mediated by STAT1. Science (Washington DC), 272: 719-722, 1996.[Abstract]
  10. Bromberg J. F., Horvath C. M., Wen Z., Schreiber R. D., Darnell J. E., Jr. Transcriptionally active Stat1 is required for the antiproliferative effects of both interferon alpha and interferon {gamma}. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 7673-7678, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Chin Y. E., Kitagawa M., Kuida K., Flavell R. A., Fu X. Y. Activation of the STAT signaling pathway can cause expression of caspase 1 and apoptosis. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 5328-5337, 1997.[Abstract]
  12. Xu X., Fu X. Y., Plate J., Chong A. S. IFN-{gamma} induces cell growth inhibition by Fas-mediated apoptosis: requirement of STAT1 protein for up-regulation of Fas and FasL expression. Cancer Res., 58: 2832-2837, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Parham D. M. The molecular biology of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma. Semin. Diag. Pathol., 11: 39-46, 1994.
  14. Parham D. M., Webber B., Holt H., Williams W. K., Maurer H. Immunohistochemical study of childhood rhabdomyosarcomas and related neoplasms. Results of an Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma study project. Cancer (Phila.), 67: 3072-3080, 1991.[Medline]
  15. Otten A. D., Firpo E. J., Gerber A. N., Brody L. L., Roberts J. M., Tapscott S. J. Inactivation of MyoD-mediated expression of p21 in tumor cell lines. Cell Growth Differ., 8: 1151-1160, 1997.[Abstract]
  16. Knudsen E. S., Pazzagli C., Born T. L., Bertolaet B. L., Knudsen K. E., Arden K. C., Henry R. R., Feramisco J. R. Elevated cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase activity in the rhabdomyosarcoma cell line RD. Cancer Res., 58: 2042-2049, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Smith S. S. Biological implications of the mechanism of action of human DNA (cytosine-5)methyltransferase. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 49: 65-111, 1994.[Medline]
  18. Li E., Beard C., Forster A. C., Bestor T. H., Jaenisch R. DNA methylation, genomic imprinting, and mammalian development. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 58: 297-305, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Razin A., Kafri T. DNA methylation from embryo to adult. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 48: 53-81, 1994.[Medline]
  20. Li E., Beard C., Jaenisch R. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature (Lond.), 366: 362-365, 1993.[Medline]
  21. Li E., Bestor T. H., Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell, 69: 915-926, 1992.[Medline]
  22. Tate P. H., Bird A. P. Effects of DNA methylation on DNA-binding proteins and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 3: 226-231, 1993.[Medline]
  23. Gama-Sosa M. A., Slagel V. A., Trewyn R. W., Oxenhandler R., Kuo K. C., Gehrke C. W., Ehrlich M. The 5-methylcytosine content of DNA from human tumors. Nucleic Acids Res., 11: 6883-6894, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Flatau E., Bogenmann E., Jones P. A. Variable 5-methylcytosine levels in human tumor cell lines and fresh pediatric tumor explants. Cancer Res., 43: 4901-4905, 1983.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Baylin S. B., Herman J. G., Graff J. R., Vertino P. M., Issa J. P. Alterations in DNA methylation: a fundamental aspect of neoplasia. Adv. Cancer Res., 72: 141-196, 1998.[Medline]
  26. Merlo A., Herman J. G., Mao L., Lee D. J., Gabrielson E., Burger P. C., Baylin S. B., Sidransky D., Baylin S. B. 5' CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat. Med., 1: 686-692, 1995.[Medline]
  27. Herman J. G., Merlo A., Mao L., Lapidus R. G., Issa J. P., Davidson N. E., Sidransky D., Baylin S. B., Sidransky D. Inactivation of the CDKN2/p16/MTS1 gene is frequently associated with aberrant DNA methylation in all common human cancers. Cancer Res., 55: 4525-4530, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Ng M. H., Chung Y. F., Lo K. W., Wickham N. W., Lee J. C., Huang D. P. Frequent hypermethylation of p16 and p15 genes in multiple myeloma. Blood, 89: 2500-2506, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Herman J. G., Jen J., Merlo A., Baylin S. B. Hypermethylation-associated inactivation indicates a tumor suppressor role for p15INK4B. Cancer Res., 56: 722-727, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Gartel A. L., Tyner A. L. Transcriptional regulation of the p21(WAF1/CIP1) gene. Exp. Cell Res., 246: 280-289, 1999.[Medline]
  31. Shiohara M., el-Deiry W. S., Wada M., Nakamaki T., Takeuchi S., Yang R., Chen D. L., Vogelstein B., Koeffler H. P., Chen D. L. Absence of WAF1 mutations in a variety of human malignancies. Blood, 84: 3781-3784, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Chen B., Dias P., Jenkins J. J., 3rd, Savell V. H., Parham D. M. Methylation alterations of the MyoD1 upstream region are predictive of subclassification of human rhabdomyosarcomas. Am. J. Pathol., 152: 1071-1079, 1998.[Abstract]
  33. Chen B., Liu X., Savell V. H., Dilday B. R., Johnson M. W., Jenkins J. J., Parham D. M. Increased DNA methyltransferase expression in rhabdomyosarcomas. Int. J. Cancer, 83: 10-14, 1999.[Medline]
  34. Barletta J. M., Rainier S., Feinberg A. P. Reversal of loss of imprinting in tumor cells by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res., 57: 48-50, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Bender C. M., Pao M. M., Jones P. A. Inhibition of DNA methylation by 5-aza-2'-deoxycytidine suppresses the growth of human tumor cell lines. Cancer Res., 58: 95-101, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Chen B., Johanson L., Wiest J. S., Anderson M. W., You M. The second intron of the K-ras gene contains regulatory elements associated with mouse lung tumor susceptibility. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 1589-1593, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Mancini D. N., Rodenhiser D. I., Ainsworth P. J., O’Malley F. P., Singh S. M., Xing W., Archer T. K. CpG methylation within the 5' regulatory region of the BRCA1 gene is tumor specific and includes a putative CREB binding site. Oncogene, 16: 1161-1169, 1998.[Medline]
  38. Wagner B. J., Hayes T. E., Hoban C. J., Cochran B. H. The SIF binding element confers sis/PDGF inducibility onto the c-fos promoter. EMBO J., 9: 4477-4484, 1990.[Medline]
  39. Halevy O., Novitch B. G., Spicer D. B., Skapek S. X., Rhee J., Hannon G. J., Beach D., Lassar A. B. Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD. Science (Washington DC), 267: 1018-1021, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Parker S. B., Eichele G., Zhang P., Rawls A., Sands A. T., Bradley A., Olson E. N., Harper J. W., Elledge S. J. p53-independent expression of p21Cip1 in muscle and other terminally differentiating cells. Science (Washington DC), 267: 1024-1027, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Tate P. H., Bird A. P. Effects of DNA methylation on DNA-binding proteins and gene expression. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 3: 226-231, 1993.
  42. Herman J. G., Latif F., Weng Y., Lerman M. I., Zbar B., Liu S., Samid D., Duan D. R., Gnarra J. R., Linehan W. M., Baylin S. B. Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 9700-9704, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Young H. A., Ghosh P., Ye J., Lederer J., Lichtman A., Gerard J. R., Penix L., Wilson C. B., Melvin A. J., McGurn M. E., Lewis D. B., Taub D. D. Differentiation of the T helper phenotypes by analysis of the methylation state of the IFN-{gamma} gene. J. Immunol., 153: 3603-3610, 1994.[Abstract]
  44. Melvin A. J., McGurn M. E., Bort S. J., Gibson C., Lewis D. B. Hypomethylation of the interferon-{gamma} gene correlates with its expression by primary T-lineage cells. Eur. J. Immunol., 25: 426-430, 1995.[Medline]
  45. Mancini D. N., Singh S. M., Archer T. K., Rodenhiser D. I. Site-specific DNA methylation in the neurofibromatosis (NF1) promoter interferes with binding of CREB and SP1 transcription factors. Oncogene, 18: 4108-4119, 1999.[Medline]
  46. Ohtani-Fujita N., Fujita T., Aoike A., Osifchin N. E., Robbins P. D., Sakai T., Fujita T. CpG methylation inactivates the promoter activity of the human retinoblastoma tumor-suppressor gene. Oncogene, 8: 1063-1067, 1993.[Medline]
  47. Xiong Y., Hannon G. J., Zhang H., Casso D., Kobayashi R., Beach D. p21 is a universal inhibitor of cyclin kinases. Nature (Lond.), 366: 701-704, 1993.[Medline]
  48. Chuang L. S., Ian H. I., Koh T. W., Ng H. H., Xu G., Li B. F. Human DNA-(cytosine-5) methyltransferase-PCNA complex as a target for p21WAF1. Science (Washington DC), 277: 1996-2000, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Vidal M. J., Loganzo F., Jr., de Oliveira A. R., Hayward N. K., Albino A. P. Mutations and defective expression of the WAF1 p21 tumour-suppressor gene in malignant melanomas. Melanoma Res., 5: 243-250, 1995.[Medline]
  50. Maelandsmo G. M., Holm R., Fodstad O., Kerbel R. S., Florenes V. A. Cyclin kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 in malignant melanoma: reduced expression in metastatic lesions. Am. J. Pathol., 149: 1813-1822, 1996.[Abstract]
  51. Topley G. I., Okuyama R., Gonzales J. G., Conti C., Dotto G. P. p21(WAF1/Cip1) functions as a suppressor of malignant skin tumor formation and a determinant of keratinocyte stem-cell potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 9089-9094, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Ozcelik H., Mousses S., Andrulis I. L. Low levels of expression of an inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CIP1/WAF1) in primary breast carcinomas with p53 mutations. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 907-912, 1995.[Abstract]
  53. Furutani M., Arii S., Tanaka H., Mise M., Niwano M., Harada T., Higashitsuji H., Imamura M., Fujita J. Decreased expression and rare somatic mutation of the CIP1/WAF1 gene in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Lett., 111: 191-197, 1997.[Medline]
  54. Nye J. A., Petersen J. M., Gunther C. V., Jonsen M. D., Graves B. J. Interaction of murine ets-1 with GGA-binding sites establishes the ETS domain as a new DNA-binding motif. Genes Dev., 6: 975-990, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Escoubet-Lozach, I-L. Lin, K. Jensen-Pergakes, H. A. Brady, A. K. Gandhi, P. H. Schafer, G. W. Muller, P. J. Worland, K. W.H. Chan, and D. Verhelle
Pomalidomide and Lenalidomide Induce p21WAF-1 Expression in Both Lymphoma and Multiple Myeloma through a LSD1-Mediated Epigenetic Mechanism
Cancer Res., September 15, 2009; 69(18): 7347 - 7356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
L. Klampfer, J. Huang, S. Shirasawa, T. Sasazuki, and L. Augenlicht
Histone Deacetylase Inhibitors Induce Cell Death Selectively in Cells That Harbor Activated kRasV12: The Role of Signal Transducers and Activators of Transcription 1 and p21
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8477 - 8485.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
F. Riuzzi, G. Sorci, and R. Donato
RAGE Expression in Rhabdomyosarcoma Cells Results in Myogenic Differentiation and Reduced Proliferation, Migration, Invasiveness, and Tumor Growth
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2007; 171(3): 947 - 961.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. Egger, A. M. Aparicio, S. G. Escobar, and P. A. Jones
Inhibition of Histone Deacetylation Does Not Block Resilencing of p16 after 5-Aza-2'-Deoxycytidine Treatment
Cancer Res., January 1, 2007; 67(1): 346 - 353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
K. Nishigaki, C. Hanson, T. Ohashi, A. Spadaccini, and S. Ruscetti
Erythroblast Transformation by the Friend Spleen Focus-Forming Virus Is Associated with a Block in Erythropoietin-Induced STAT1 Phosphorylation and DNA Binding and Correlates with High Expression of the Hematopoietic Phosphatase SHP-1.
J. Virol., June 1, 2006; 80(12): 5678 - 5685.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. L. Gartel and S. K. Radhakrishnan
Lost in Transcription: p21 Repression, Mechanisms, and Consequences
Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 3980 - 3985.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Grandemange, P. Seyer, A. Carazo, P. Becuwe, L. Pessemesse, M. Busson, C. Marsac, P. Roger, F. Casas, G. Cabello, et al.
Stimulation of Mitochondrial Activity by p43 Overexpression Induces Human Dermal Fibroblast Transformation
Cancer Res., May 15, 2005; 65(10): 4282 - 4291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
U. Chatterji, J. E. Riby, T. Taniguchi, E. L. Bjeldanes, L. F. Bjeldanes, and G. L. Firestone
Indole-3-carbinol stimulates transcription of the interferon gamma receptor 1 gene and augments interferon responsiveness in human breast cancer cells
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2004; 25(7): 1119 - 1128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
V. Staalesen, B. Leirvaag, J. R. Lillehaug, and P. E. Lonning
Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in p21 and p21B Do Not Correlate with Resistance to Doxorubicin or Mitomycin and 5-Fluorouracil in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 15, 2004; 10(10): 3438 - 3443.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Ying, G. Srivastava, Z. Gao, X. Zhang, P. Murray, R. Ambinder, and Q. Tao
Promoter hypermethylation of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKI) gene p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1 is rare in various lymphomas and carcinomas
Blood, January 15, 2004; 103(2): 743 - 746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
N. Sato, N. Fukushima, A. Maitra, H. Matsubayashi, C. J. Yeo, J. L. Cameron, R. H. Hruban, and M. Goggins
Discovery of Novel Targets for Aberrant Methylation in Pancreatic Carcinoma Using High-Throughput Microarrays
Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 63(13): 3735 - 3742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
W.-G. Zhu, K. Srinivasan, Z. Dai, W. Duan, L. J. Druhan, H. Ding, L. Yee, M. A. Villalona-Calero, C. Plass, and G. A. Otterson
Methylation of Adjacent CpG Sites Affects Sp1/Sp3 Binding and Activity in the p21Cip1 Promoter
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2003; 23(12): 4056 - 4065.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Nanni, G. Nicoletti, C. De Giovanni, S. Croci, A. Astolfi, L. Landuzzi, E. Di Carlo, M. Iezzi, P. Musiani, and P.-L. Lollini
Development of Rhabdomyosarcoma in HER-2/neu Transgenic p53 Mutant Mice
Cancer Res., June 1, 2003; 63(11): 2728 - 2732.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. He, M. J. J. Ronis, and T. M. Badger
Ethanol Induction of Class I Alcohol Dehydrogenase Expression in the Rat Occurs through Alterations in CCAAT/Enhancer Binding Proteins beta and gamma
J. Biol. Chem., November 8, 2002; 277(46): 43572 - 43577.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
L. Shen, Y. Kondo, J.-P. Issa, G. Garcia-Manero, J. Roman-Gomez, J. A. Castillejo, A. Torres, and A. Jimenez
Lack of p21CIP1 DNA methylation in acute lymphocytic leukemia
Blood, October 16, 2002; 100(9): 3432 - 3433.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Widschwendter, S. Tonko-Geymayer, T. Welte, G. Daxenbichler, C. Marth, and W. Doppler
Prognostic Significance of Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 1 Activation in Breast Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2002; 8(10): 3065 - 3074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
C. Hong, Hyeon.-A. Kim, G. L. Firestone, and L. F. Bjeldanes
3,3'-Diindolylmethane (DIM) induces a G1 cell cycle arrest in human breast cancer cells that is accompanied by Sp1-mediated activation of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2002; 23(8): 1297 - 1305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. Roman-Gomez, J. A. Castillejo, A. Jimenez, M. G. Gonzalez, F. Moreno, M. d. C. Rodriguez, M. Barrios, J. Maldonado, and A. Torres
5' CpG island hypermethylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the p21CIP1/WAF1/SDI1 gene and confers poor prognosis in acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood, April 1, 2002; 99(7): 2291 - 2296.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
I. TEGEDER, J. PFEILSCHIFTER, and G. GEISSLINGER
Cyclooxygenase-independent actions of cyclooxygenase inhibitors
FASEB J, October 1, 2001; 15(12): 2057 - 2072.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
M.-L. Santiago-Raber, B. R. Lawson, W. Dummer, M. Barnhouse, S. Koundouris, C. B. Wilson, D. H. Kono, and A. N. Theofilopoulos
Role of Cyclin Kinase Inhibitor p21 in Systemic Autoimmunity
J. Immunol., October 1, 2001; 167(7): 4067 - 4074.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, B.
Right arrow Articles by Parham, D. M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online