[Cancer Research 60, 3978-3984, July 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Cimetidine Inhibits Cancer Cell Adhesion to Endothelial Cells and Prevents Metastasis by Blocking E-selectin Expression1
Ken-ichi Kobayashi,
Sumio Matsumoto,
Takashi Morishima,
Takumi Kawabe and
Takashi Okamoto2
Department of Molecular Genetics, Nagoya City University Medical School, Nagoya 467-8601 [K-i. K., T. M., T. K., T. O.], and Department of Surgery, 2nd Teaching Hospital, Fujita Health University Medical School, Nagoya 454-8509 [K-i. K., T. M., S. M.], Japan
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Although the beneficial effect of cimetidine on survival in cancer has
been clinically demonstrated in colorectal cancer patients, the mode of
action of cimetidine has not been elucidated. In this report, we have
demonstrated for the first time that cimetidine can block the adhesion
of a colorectal tumor cell line to the endothelial cell monolayer in
cell culture and that it can suppress the metastasis of the tumor cell
in a nude mouse model. We also demonstrated that these antimetastasis
effects of cimetidine might occur through down-regulation of the cell
surface expression of E-selectin on endothelial cells, a ligand for
sialyl Lewis antigens on tumor cells. We found that the
cimetidine-mediated down-regulation of E-selectin did not involve
down-regulation of E-selectin mRNA or blocking of the nuclear
translocation of nuclear factor
B, a transcriptional activator of
E-selectin gene expression. Because two other histamine type 2 receptor
antagonists, famotidine and ranitidine, did not show any similar
effect, these actions of cimetidine probably do not occur via
blocking of the histamine receptor. These observations support the idea
that cancer metastasis can be blocked by cimetidine administration
through blocking the adhesion of tumor cells to the endothelium when an
interaction between E-selectin and sialyl-Lewis antigens plays a role.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Cimetidine has been shown to improve the survival of patients with
colorectal cancer, melanoma, and renal cell cancer (19)
.
Although it is not clear whether this effect of cimetidine on cancer is
direct or indirect, it has been proposed that cimetidine may act by
enhancing the host immune response against tumor cells (10, 11)
or by blocking the cell growth-promoting activity of
histamine in colon cancer and melanoma cell lines (9, 1214)
. Other
H2R3
antagonists including ranitidine and famotidine did not have such an
effect on the survival of cancer patients (1315)
,
indicating that the anticancer actions of cimetidine might not be
mediated via histamine antagonism. Therefore, the mechanism of action
by which cimetidine prolongs the survival of patients with various
forms of cancer remains to be clarified.
In this study, we have attempted to examine the action of cimetidine by
investigating its effect on the cancer cell adhesion to endothelial
cells, one of the critical steps of cancer invasion and metastasis. We
have also applied an in vivo metastasis model to confirm the
effect of cimetidine. We demonstrated previously (16)
that
the induction of E-selectin in HUVECs by IL-1ß induced the adhesion
of cancer cells expressing the E-selectin ligand sialyl Lewis antigens
(17, 18)
to HUVECs and that inhibitors of NF-
B
activation including pentoxifylline, aspirin, and
N-acetyl-L-cysteine could block the
cancer cell adhesion by inhibiting the IL-1ß-mediated induction of
E-selectin. Here we attempted to examine the effect of
cimetidine by applying a similar approach, and we found that cimetidine
blocked cancer cell adhesion to HUVECs. We also demonstrated that
cimetidine can prevent liver metastasis in a nude mouse model in which
tumor cell line HT-29 was injected intrasplenically.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Cells.
HUVECs were isolated from fresh human umbilical cords by treatment with
1 mg/ml collagenase and dispase and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented
with 50 µg/ml endothelial cell growth supplement (UBI, Lake
Success, NY), 1 µg/ml epithelial growth factor (UBI), 292
µg/ml L-glutamine, 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml
streptomycin, 5 µg/ml heparin, and 15% fetal bovine serum. HUVECs
were characterized by expression of von Willebrand factor using
immunostaining with a specific antiserum (Zymed, San Francisco, CA).
HUVECs between passage 4 and 8 were used in this study. HUVECs obtained
from three unrelated donors were assessed in this study, and we ensured
that the observed effects were not batch specific. HUVECs from a single
donor were used within each experiment. Human tumor cell line HT-29
expressing sialyl Lewis antigens (X and A) and derived from
well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the colon (19)
was a
gift from Dr. M. Iigoh (National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan). This
cell line was maintained in McCoys medium supplemented with 10%
fetal bovine serum.
Cytotoxicity of Compounds.
To evaluate the cytotoxicity of each compound,
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays
were performed by incubating HUVECs or HT-29 cells with various
concentrations of each compound according to the method described
previously (20)
.
Reagents.
Recombinant IL-1ß was a gift from Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co.
(Tokushima, Japan). Immunostaining and flow cytometry (FACScan) of
E-selectin were carried out using a peptide-specific mouse monoclonal
antibody to human E-selectin as a primary antibody (R&D Systems,
Minneapolis, MN) as reported previously (16, 21) . For
ELISA, mouse monoclonal antibodies to human E-selectin (CD62E;
PharMingen, San Diego, CA) and human ICAM-1 (CD54; Becton Dickinson,
San Jose, CA) were used. The secondary antibodies used for
immunostaining and ELISA were FITC-conjugated rabbit antimouse IgG or
rhodamine-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG (Cappel, Durham, NC) and
horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse IgG antibody
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom),
respectively. For the immunostaining of NF-
B, the peptide-specific
rabbit antibody to human p65 was used as a primary antibody
(22)
. Commercial antibodies to p65 and p50 (Santa Cruz
Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) were also used for this study. For
blocking of the HT-29 cell adhesion to HUVECs, antibodies to E-selectin
(CD62E) and to sialyl LewisX (CD15s; PharMingen)
were used. Pentoxifylline and aspirin were purchased from Sigma
Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Cimetidine, famotidine, and ranitidine
were kindly provided by Smith Kline Beecham Japan (Tokyo, Japan),
Yamanouchi (Tokyo, Japan), and Sankyo (Tokyo, Japan), respectively.
Aspirin was dissolved in 99% ethanol. H2R blockers and pentoxifylline
were dissolved in PBS.
Monolayer Cell Adhesion Assay.
HUVECs were stimulated with 10 ng/ml IL-1ß for 04 h in a
10-cm2 plate. HT-29 cells (1 x 105 cells/200 µl/well) were added onto a
semiconfluent monolayer culture of HUVECs, incubated for 20 min at
37°C with rotation at 120 rpm, and washed extensively to exclude
nonspecific cell attachment. The number of attached cells was counted
directly under a microscope as reported previously (16)
.
For antibody-mediated blocking of cell adhesion, the IL-1ß-stimulated
HUVECs were incubated with antibody to either E-selectin (CD62E) or
ICAM-1 (CD54; final dilution of 1:400 for both antibodies) for
3 h at 37°C in humidified CO2 incubator,
and then HT-29 cells were added. In the case of sialyl
LewisX, the antibody (CD15s) was incubated with
HT-29 for 1 h and added to the IL-1ß-stimulated HUVECs.
Northern Blot Analysis.
Poly(A) RNA was purified from HUVECs treated with various
concentrations of cimetidine in the absence or presence of IL-1ß
using a commercial mRNA isolation kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim,
Germany). Two µg of poly(A) RNA were loaded onto each lane. The
electrophoresis and blotting to Hybond-N membrane filter (Amersham
Pharmacia Biotech) were performed as recommended by the supplier.
Hybridization was carried out with a specific cDNA probe for E-selectin
that did not hybridize with other selectin genes. A cDNA probe for
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase was used as an internal
control. Radiolabeling was carried out using a commercial kit (Random
Primer Labeling Kit; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA).
Immunostaining, Flow Cytometry, Immunoblotting, and Confocal
Laser Microscopy.
Immunostaining was performed as reported previously (16, 21)
. Briefly, semiconfluent HUVECs on Lab-Tek tissue culture
chamber slides (Nunc, Inc., Naperville, IL) were fixed with acetone for
10 min at -20°C and washed three times with PBS. They were
subsequently incubated with the primary antibody for 1 h at
37°C. After washing three times with PBS containing 0.05% Triton
X-100, they were incubated with the secondary antibody for 20
min at 37°C. Slides were mounted with buffered glycerol for
fluorescence (BX50; Olympus Co., Tokyo, Japan) or confocal laser
microscopic examination (MRC-600UV; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Primary and
secondary antibodies were diluted 1:100 in PBS containing 3% BSA. For
analysis of cell surface E-selectin expression, unfixed cells were
stained with the same anti-E-selectin antibody and FITC-conjugated
rabbit antimouse IgG, and cytofluorometric examination was carried out
as described previously (Ref. 21
; FACScan; Becton
Dickinson). For immunoblotting, total cell extracts prepared from HUVEC
cultures were analyzed with the mouse monoclonal anti-E-selectin
antibody according to the method reported previously (21)
.
ELISA.
An ELISA method was developed, according to the work of Wellicome
et al. (23)
, to quantitatively measure the
amount of cell adhesion molecules, including E-selectin and ICAM-1,
expressed on the cell surface of HUVEC cultures. Basically, the ELISA
was performed at room temperature with three washes of 0.1% BSA in PBS
between each step. HUVECs were incubated for 1 h with the primary
antibody, antihuman E-selectin monoclonal antibody (CD62E) or antihuman
ICAM-1 monoclonal antibody (CD54). After washing, the secondary
antibody, horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse IgG
antibody, was added and incubated with HUVECs for 30 min. The enzyme
substrate O-phenylenediamine (1 mg/ml) and 0.03% hydrogen
peroxide in citrate-phosphate buffer (pH 5.0) were then added. Color
development was stopped with 2 N sulfuric acid,
and the absorbance of each well was read at 450 nm in a Titertek ELISA
plate reader (SLT Lab Instruments, Salzburg, Austria). Test and control
samples were examined in triplicates for each experiment. The degree of
specific antibody binding was calculated by subtracting the mean
negative control value (without the primary antibody), and the results
were expressed as the fold activation of surface E-selectin expression
(mean ± SD). In each experiment, HUVECs at the fourth
or the fifth passage were used to minimize the interassay variation.
Although HUVEC cultures from three unrelated donors were tested,
there was no significant difference in the level of E-selectin or
ICAM-1 expression. Within each experiment, cells from a single donor
were used.
Nude Mouse Model of Liver Metastasis.
All of the experimental procedures were performed with the approval of
the Animal Experimentation Committee of Nagoya City University
Medical School. Specific pathogen-free athymic BALB/c female mice of
34 weeks of age were kept under sterile conditions in a laminar flow
room in cages with filter bonnets and fed a sterilized mouse diet and
water. To induce hepatic metastasis of tumor cells, HT-29 was injected
intrasplenically. The mice were anesthetized by i.p. administration of
pentobarbital (12 µg/g body weight), and a small left subcostal
incision was made to expose the spleen. HT-29 cells (1 x 106 or 1 x 107 cells in different experiments) in 100 µl
of PBS were injected beneath the splenic capsule using a 27-gauge
needle. To examine the effect of H2R antagonists, the mice were treated
with 200, 50, or 10 mg/kg/day cimetidine or saline (control) i.p. for
10 consecutive days, that is, for 5 days before HT-29 injection and for
5 days after HT-29 injection. Subsequently, H2R antagonists or saline
(control) was administered every other day for an additional 9 weeks
and 2 days (a total of 10 weeks after HT-29 cell implantation).
Quantification of Hepatic Metastasis in Nude Mice.
Ten weeks after HT-29 cell injection, animals were sacrificed, and the
status of liver metastasis was evaluated quantitatively. The livers
were excised and cut into 23-mm-thick slices that were then fixed in
ice-cold acetone for subsequent H&E staining. The area of tumor nodules
was measured with the aid of a video image processor (VIP-21C; Olympus
Co.), and it was expressed as a percentage of occupancy in the liver
according to the method of Hirose et al. (24)
.
Statistical Analysis.
Differences between the results of experimental treatments were
evaluated by means of the two-tailed Students t test.
Fishers exact probability test was used to assess the difference in
the incidence of metastatic liver lesions. StatView-J 4.0.2 computer
software was applied for these analyses.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Suppression of Tumor Cell Adhesion to Endothelial Cells by
Cimetidine.
To examine the effects of cimetidine on HT-29 tumor cell adhesion to
HUVECs, a monolayer cell adhesion assay was carried out. As shown in
Fig. 1A
, the adhesion of HT-29 cells to HUVECs was strongly induced
on stimulation with IL-1ß (10 ng/ml). The maximum induction of cell
adhesion by IL-1ß was obtained after 4 h of stimulation. Using
this model, we investigated the effects of various H2R antagonists at a
range of noncytotoxic concentrations [from
10-4 to
10-8
M (9, 13)
; also confirmed by
3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay in
this study]. Cultured HUVECs were pretreated with cimetidine or other
H2R antagonists 2 h before the addition of IL-1ß. After 4 h
of IL-1ß stimulation, HT-29 cells were added, and the cell adhesion
assay was performed. As shown in Fig. 1
, pretreatment of HUVECs with
pentoxifylline blocked the adhesion with HT-29 cells, as reported
previously (16)
. Similarly, this adhesion of HT-29 cells
to HUVECs was inhibited by cimetidine in a dose-dependent manner.
However, other H2R antagonists, famotidine and ranitidine, had no
inhibitory effect.

View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. Inhibition of HT-29 tumor cell adhesion to HUVECs by
cimetidine. HT-29 cells (1 x 105 cells/200
ml/well) were added onto a semiconfluent monolayer culture of HUVECs,
incubated for 20 min at 37°C with rotation at 120 rpm, and washed
extensively to exclude nonspecific cell attachment. A,
various concentrations of H2R antagonists were added, and HT-29-HUVEC
interaction was examined in the presence of IL-1ß (10 ng/ml).
Phase-contrast microscopic pictures of representative experiments are
shown. B, quantitation of HT-29-HUVEC interaction. The
number of HT-29 cells adhering to the HUVEC monolayer was counted.
Values were obtained from the results of three independent experiments;
bars, SD.
|
|
To confirm that the HT-29 adhesion to HUVECs was due to the cognate
interaction between sialyl LewisX (on HT-29) and
E-selectin (induced on HUVECs by IL-1ß), specific antibodies were
applied to block these molecules before the cell adhesion assay. In
Fig. 2
, we incubated HUVECs that had been stimulated with IL-1ß with the
antibody to E-selectin or ICAM-1, and the monolayer cell adhesion assay
was carried out. When HUVECs were preincubated with the antibody to
E-selectin, the IL-1ß-induced HT-29 adhesion to HUVECs was
abolished (Fig. 2, A and B)
. Similarly, when
HT-29 cells were preincubated with the antibody to sialyl
LewisX, the HT-29 adhesion to HUVECs was also
blocked. In contrast, preincubation of HT-29 cells with anti-ICAM-1
antibody did not significantly reduce cell adhesion. There was no
significant effect of antibodies to E-selectin or sialyl
LewisX antigens on the basal level of HT-29
adhesion to HUVECs (without IL-1ß stimulation; data not shown). These
findings were consistent with previous observations by others
(18, 25, 26)
and indicate that both E-selectin and sialyl
LewisX are primarily involved in our experimental
cell adhesion assay system using HT-29 cells and HUVECs.

View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Inhibition of HT-29 tumor cell adhesion to HUVECs by
E-selectin, sialyl Lewisx, and ICAM-1 antibody.
A, E-selectin, sialyl Lewisx, and ICAM-1
antibody were added (at a final dilution of 1:400), and HT-29-HUVEC
interaction was examined in the presence of IL-1ß (10 ng/ml).
Phase-contrast microscopic pictures of representative experiments are
shown. B, quantitation of HT-29-HUVEC interaction. The
number of HT-29 cells adhering to the HUVEC monolayer was counted.
Values were obtained from the results of three independent experiments;
bars, SD.
|
|
Effects of Cimetidine on E-selectin Gene Expression and
IL-1ß-mediated NF-
B Activation.
To investigate the effect of cimetidine on the E-selectin mRNA
level, Northern blot analysis was carried out (Fig. 3A
). Poly(A) RNA purified from HUVEC cultures treated with
various concentrations of cimetidine in the absence or presence of
IL-1ß was hybridized with the E-selectin cDNA probe. As shown in Fig. 3A
, IL-1ß could induce E-selectin gene expression.
However, even at the highest concentration, cimetidine could not
significantly reduce the E-selectin mRNA level. We also examined the
effect of cimetidine on the IL-1ß-induced nuclear translocation of
NF-
B (Fig. 3B
). In contrast to aspirin, which effectively
blocked the nuclear translocation of NF-
B as reported previously
(16, 21) , cimetidine or other H2R antagonists did not
block the nuclear translocation of NF-
B elicited by IL-1ß (Fig. 3A
).
Cimetidine Blocked Cell Surface Expression of E-selectin Induced by
IL-1ß.
We then examined the effect of H2R antagonists on the E-selectin
protein level in HUVECs stimulated by IL-1ß using
immunohistochemistry and cytofluorometry (Fig. 4
). Maximum induction of E-selectin by IL-1ß (10 ng/ml) was obtained
after 4 h of treatment (Fig. 4A
), which coincided with
the HT-29 adhesion to HUVECs. Interestingly, a significant suppression
of E-selectin induction was observed on pretreatment of HUVECs with
cimetidine in a dose-dependent manner at noncytotoxic concentrations
(from 10-8 to
10-4
M), which again correlated with the effect of
cimetidine on the adhesion of HT-29 cells to HUVECs (Fig. 1)
. It was
noted by confocal microscopic examination that there was no significant
change in the intracellular localization of E-selectin (Fig. 4A
). Neither famotidine nor ranitidine showed any inhibitory
effect on E-selectin levels. There was no change in the expression
level of sialyl Lewis antigens on the HT-29 cell surface by cimetidine
(data not shown). There was no significant effect of cimetidine on the
ICAM-1 level in HUVECs in either the presence or absence of IL-1ß
(data not shown). In spite of our repeated attempts to identify the
change of E-selectin protein levels by Western blotting using a number
of commercially available antibodies, we were not able to detect the
monospecific band corresponding to E-selectin, a failure we believe to
be due to the low affinity of the antibodies in solution or the
presence of interacting proteins that interfered in the antibody
reaction.

View larger version (45K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. Inhibition of E-selectin induction on HUVECs by
cimetidine. A, confocal laser microscopic examination of
HUVECs on treatment with cimetidine at the indicated concentrations.
B, E-selectin expression on the cell surface of HUVECs
by cytofluorometry. Unfixed cells were stained with mouse monoclonal
antibody to E-selectin. Before stimulation with IL-1ß, HUVECs were
treated with 10-6,
10-5, or 10-4
M cimetidine. Fractions (%) of cells with high-level
E-selectin expression are indicated.
|
|
Quantitation of the Cell Surface E-selectin Expression by ELISA.
We thus developed a cell ELISA system, as described by Wellicome
et al. (23)
, to quantitate the E-selectin level
on the HUVEC cell surface. Using this system, the effects of H2R
antagonists on E-selectin and ICAM-1 expression on HUVECs with or
without IL-1ß stimulation were examined. As shown in Fig. 5A
, the E-selectin level on HUVECs was augmented by
6.0 ± 0.36-fold on stimulation with IL-1ß. When
HUVECs were pretreated with cimetidine 2 h before IL-1ß
stimulation, the extent of E-selectin induction decreased to
4.9 ± 0.35-, 1.9 ± 0.06-, and
1.1 ± 0.12-fold at cimetidine concentrations of
10-8,
10-6, and
10-4
M, respectively (P < 0.01). The cell surface ICAM-1 expression was also augmented by
6.37 ± 0.43-fold on IL-1ß treatment (Fig. 5B
). However, ICAM-1 expression was not significantly
inhibited by cimetidine pretreatment. Neither famotidine nor ranitidine
showed any inhibitory effect (Fig. 5, C and D)
.

View larger version (68K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 5. Quantitation of cell adhesion molecules on HUVECs by cell
ELISA. A, HUVECs were treated with cimetidine in the
presence or absence of IL-1ß (10 ng/ml) stimulation, and E-selectin
levels were measured. Asterisks indicate that the
reduction of the E-selectin level was statistically significant
(P < 0.01). B, similar
quantitation was performed for ICAM-1. C and
D, effects of other H2R antagonists, famotidine
(C) and ranitidine (D), were evaluated on
the level of E-selectin on HUVECs stimulated with IL-1ß. Values were
obtained from the results of three independent experiments;
bars, SD.
|
|
Suppression of Liver Metastasis in Nude Mice by Cimetidine.
The efficacy of cimetidine in blocking E-selectin protein
expression and the subsequent HT-29 cell adhesion to HUVECs prompted us
to examine the effects of cimetidine on liver metastasis using a nude
mouse model in vivo. Mice were inoculated with HT-29
(1 x 106 and 1 x
107 cells in experiments 1 and 2, respectively)
intrasplenically, and the effects of cimetidine on the incidence and
the extent of liver metastasis were evaluated. Ten weeks after the
injection of HT-29 cells, mice were sacrificed, and the status of liver
metastasis was examined. The areas of metastatic nodules in the liver
were measured from the excised liver slices using a video image
processor according to the method developed by Hirose et al.
(24)
. As demonstrated in Table 1
, cimetidine prevented the incidence of liver metastasis in a
dose-dependent manner. At the highest dose of cimetidine (daily doses
of 200 mg/kg), liver metastasis was completely inhibited when
1 x 106 HT-29 cells were injected
intrasplenically (none of the nine mice had detectable liver
metastasis; Table 1
, experiment 1), whereas there was no notable
difference in the size of the primary tumor in the spleen (data not
shown). Famotidine or ranitidine at doses equivalent to that of
cimetidine had no inhibitory effect on liver metastasis (data
not shown). A repeated experiment using a greater number of HT-29 cells
(1 x 107) for inoculation
demonstrated similar effects of cimetidine on the prevention of
liver metastasis (Table 1
, experiment 2). Furthermore, the
extent of liver metastasis (the percentage of occupancy of the
metastatic nodules in the liver slices) was significantly diminished in
the cimetidine-treated animals (Table 2
).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Frequency of liver metastasis 10 weeks after intrasplenic injection of
HT-29 cells in nude mice
Liver foci larger than 0.1 mm in diameter were not observed in a group
of animals treated with 200 mg cimetidine/kg/day.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Percentage of occupancy of the metastatic regions in the liver
Values shown represent the means (%) ± SD.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The clinical benefit of cimetidine for the prolonged survival of
cancer patients has been established previously (19)
. In
this study, we investigated the effects of cimetidine using an in
vitro cell culture system and an in vivo nude mice
cancer metastasis model. These experiments clearly demonstrated that
cimetidine effectively blocked HT-29 adhesion to HUVECs by preventing
E-selectin induction and the trans-portal liver metastasis
of HT-29 cells in nude mice.
E-selectin is considered to play a primary role in initiating the
adhesion of cancer cells to vascular endothelial cells through its
interaction with its specific ligand sialyl Lewis antigens
(1618, 2528) . In a previous study (16)
,
we reported that adhesion of tumor cell line QG90 to HUVECs was
dependent on E-selectin expression on the cell surface of HUVECs and
was induced by IL-1ß. Similar results were reported with HT-29 cells
by Dejana et al. (26)
. In these studies,
IL-1ß was used to activate E-selectin on HUVECs to mimic the local
inflammatory response in the metastasized region (29, 30)
,
and some tumor cells were reported to produce IL-1ß (31, 32)
. In fact, expression of E-selectin in endothelium adjacent
to the metastatic tumor lesion was reported by others (33, 34)
. It is also known that E-selectin is induced on
ischemia-reperfusion injury (35)
, which may be associated
with tumor embolism during metastasis. Thus, it is likely that
E-selectin is induced by such mechanisms in our nude mice model.
We found that the effect of cimetidine did not appear to be at the
level of E-selectin gene expression because the E-selectin protein
level was reduced without significantly reducing its mRNA level. The
failure of cimetidine to block NF-
B nuclear translocation also
supported this possibility. Previous studies have indicated a variety
of unexpected actions of cimetidine. For example, cimetidine was
reported to have direct growth-inhibitory effects on certain cancer
cell lines (1, 14)
and direct stimulatory effects on
lymphocyte function (1012)
. It was also reported that
histamine was released into the blood stream during the operation,
presumably from tumor cells (36)
or the adjacent mast
cells (37)
, and that histamine interfered with the host
immune system (10, 11, 38)
. It was then suggested that
histamine might promote the growth of tumor cells (12, 14, 39)
. However, we did not observe any cytotoxic or cytostatic
effects of cimetidine on HT-29. In addition, we found that other H2R
antagonists did not have the same effect as cimetidine in our
experimental systems, indicating that this action of cimetidine is
probably not mediated via the H2R. In addition, although some reports
have indicated that cimetidine may have antioxidant activity
(4042)
, and antioxidants have been shown to block
E-selectin gene expression by blocking the activation cascade of
NF-
B (16)
, cimetidine did not block IL-1ß-induced
NF-
B activation (Fig. 3B
).
The action of cimetidine on E-selectin expression does not appear to
involve the transcription step. Therefore, the experimental
observations obtained in this study suggest that cimetidine may block
E-selectin expression at a step after transcription. In this regard, it
may be worth noting that other regulatory molecules such as p38 MAPK,
in addition to NF-
B, were also involved in IL-1ß signaling
(43, 44)
. Because it has been implicated that E-selectin
expression requires p38 MAPK (43)
, and p38 MAPK activates
the expression of a number of genes at the level of posttranscription
(4446)
, the issue of whether cimetidine but not other
H2R antagonists might interfere with such signaling mediators should be
explored.
Our observations support the previous clinical findings that
cimetidine increased the survival of cancer patients. It is
likely that cimetidine may block cancer cell adhesion to
endothelial cells and thus prevent metastasis. In fact, we found in our
recent randomized clinical study that cimetidine treatment
significantly reduced cancer metastasis and recurrence, thus resulting
in the prolonged survival of patients with colorectal cancer whose
tumors had high levels of sialyl Lewis
antigens.4
There were no effects when the tumor had no sialyl Lewis antigens or
low levels of sialyl Lewis antigens. Additional analyses on the actions
of cimetidine are needed to identify a novel therapeutic target against
cancer aggression.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank M. Futakuchi (Department of Pathology, Nagoya City
University Medical School, Nagoya, Japan) for help in the quantitation
of liver metastasis using a video image processor.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported in part by grants-in-aids for
Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and
Culture, the Ministry of Health and Human Welfare, Japan and the
Japanese Health Sciences Foundation. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Molecular Genetics, Nagoya City University
Medical School, 1 Kawasumi, Mizuho-cho, Mizuho-ku, Nagoya 467-8601,
Japan. Phone: 81-52-853-8204; Fax: 81-52-859-1235; E-mail: tokamoto{at}med.nagoya-cu.ac.jp 
3 The abbreviations used are: H2R, histamine type
2 receptor; NF-
B, nuclear factor
B; HUVEC, human umbilical vein
endothelial cell; ICAM, intercellular adhesion molecule; IL-1,
interleukin 1; poly(A) RNA, polyadenylated RNA; MAPK, mitogen-activated
protein kinase. 
4 S. Matsumoto, K. Kobayashi, S. Umemoto,
K. Suzuki, and T. Okamoto. Effects of cimetidine on survival after
curative operation of colorectal cancer: cimetidine increases survival
of colorectal cancer patients with high levels of sialyl Lewis-X and
sialyl Lewis-A epitope expression on tumor cells, manuscript in
preparation. 
Received 12/14/99.
Accepted 5/16/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Adams W. J., Morris D. L. Short-course cimetidine and survival with colorectal cancer. Lancet, 344: 1768-1769, 1994.[Medline]
-
Matsumoto S. Cimetidine and survival with colorectal cancer. Lancet, 346: 115 1995.[Medline]
-
Svendsen L. B., Ross C., Knigge U., Frederiksen H. J., Graversen P., Kjaergard J., Luke M., Stimpel H., Sparso B. H. Cimetidine as an adjuvant treatment in colorectal cancer. Dis. Colon Rectum, 38: 514-518, 1995.[Medline]
-
Hellstrand K., Naredi P., Lindner P., Lundholm K., Rudenstam C. M., Hermodsson S., Asztely M., Hafstrom L. Histamine in immunotherapy of advanced melanoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother, 39: 416-419, 1994.[Medline]
-
Creagan E. T., Ahman D. L., Green S. J., Long H. J., Frytak S., Itri L. M. Phase II study of recombinant leukocyte A interferon (IFN-RA) plus cimetidine in disseminated malignant melanoma. J. Clin. Oncol, 3: 977-981, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sagaster P., Micksche M., Flamm J., Ludwig H. Randomised study using IFN-
versus IFN-
plus coumarin and cimetidine for treatment of advanced renal cell cancer. Ann. Oncol, 6: 999-1003, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Morris D. L., Adams W. J. Cimetidine and colorectal cancerold drug, new use?. Nat. Med, 1: 1243-1244, 1995.[Medline]
-
Kelly M. D., King J., Cherian M., Dwerryhouse S. J., Finlay I. G., Adams W. J., King D. W., Lubowski D. Z., Morris D. L. Randomized trial of preoperative cimetidine in patients with colorectal carcinoma with quantitative assessment of tumor-associated lymphocytes. Cancer (Phila.), 85: 1658-1663, 1999.[Medline]
-
Sasson A. R., Gamagami R., An Z., Wang X., Moossa A. R., Hoffman R. M. Cimetidine: an inhibitor or promoter of tumor growth?. Int. J. Cancer, 81: 835-838, 1999.[Medline]
-
Hansbrough J. F., Zapata-Sirvent R. L., Bender E. M. Prevention of alterations in postoperative lymphocyte subpopulations by cimetidine and ibuprofen. Am. J. Surg, 151: 249-255, 1986.[Medline]
-
Adams W. J., Morris D. L., Ross W. R., Lubowski D. Z., King D. W. Cimetidine preserves non-specific immune function after colonic resection for cancer. Aust. N. Z. J. Surg, 64: 847-852, 1994.[Medline]
-
Adams W. J., Lawson J. A., Morris D. L. Cimetidine inhibits in vivo growth of human colon cancer and reverses histamine stimulated in vitro and in vivo growth. Gut, 35: 1632-1636, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lawson J. A., Adams W. J., Morris D. L. Ranitidine and cimetidine differ in their in vitro and in vivo effects on human colonic cancer growth. Br. J. Cancer, 73: 872-876, 1996.[Medline]
-
Reynolds J. L., Akhter J., Morris D. L. In vitro effect of histamine and histamine HI and H2 receptor antagonists on cellular proliferation of human malignant melanoma cell lines. Melanoma Res, 6: 95-99, 1996.[Medline]
-
Hahm K. B., Kim W. H., Lee S. I., Kang J. K., Park I. S. Comparison of immunomodulative effects of the histamine-2 receptor antagonist cimetidine ranitidine, and famotidine on peripheral blood mononuclear cells in gastric cancer patients. Scand. J. Gastroenterol, 30: 265-271, 1995.[Medline]
-
Tozawa K., Sakurada S., Kohri K., Okamoto T. Effects of anti-nuclear factor
B reagents in blocking adhesion of human cancer cells to vascular endothelial cells. Cancer Res, 55: 4162-4167, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Majuri M. L., Niemela R., Tiisala S., Renkonen O., Renkonen R. Expression and function of
2,3-sialyl-and
1,3/1,4-fucosyltransferases in colon adenocarcinoma cell lines: role in synthesis of E-selection counter-receptors. Int. J. Cancer, 63: 551-559, 1995.[Medline]
-
Srinivas U., Pahlsson P., Lundblad A. E-selectin: sialyl Lewis, a dependent adhesion of colon cancer cells is inhibited differently by antibodies against E-selectin ligands. Scand. J. Immunol, 44: 197-203, 1996.[Medline]
-
Thomas D. R., Philpott G. W., Jaffe B. M. Prostaglandin E (PGE) control of cell proliferation in vitro: characteristics of HT-29. J. Surg. Res, 16: 463-465, 1974.[Medline]
-
Merin J. P., Matsuyama M., Kira T., Baba M., Okamoto T.
-Lipoic acid blocks HIV-1 LTR-dependent expression of hygromycin resistance in THP-1 stable transformants. FEBS Lett, 394: 9-13, 1996.[Medline]
-
Sakurada S., Kato T., Okamoto T. Induction of cytokines and ICAM-1 by proinflammatory cytokines in primary rheumatoid synovial fibroblasts and inhibition by N-acetyl-L-cysteine and aspirin. Int. Immunol, 8: 1483-1493, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hayashi T., Sekine T., Okamoto T. Identification of a new serine kinase that activates NF-
B by direct phosphorylation. J. Biol. Chem, 268: 26790-26795, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wellicome S. M., Thornhill M. H., Thomas D. S., Pitzalis C., Lanchbury J. S. S., Panayi G. S., Haskard D. O. A monoclonal antibody that detects a novel antigen on endothelial cells that is induced by TNF, IL-1 or LPS. J. Immunol, 144: 2558-2565, 1990.[Abstract]
-
Hirose M., Hasegawa R., Kimura J., Akagi K., Yoshida Y., Tanaka H., Miki T., Satoh T., Wakabayashi K., Ito N., Shirai T. Inhitory effects of 1-O-hexyl-2,3,5-trimethylhydroquinone (HTHQ), green tea catechins and other antioxidants on 2-amino-6-methyldipyrido[1,2-a: 3',2'-d]imidazole (Glu-P-1)-induced rat hepatocarcinogenesis and dose-dependent inhibition by HTHQ of lesion induction by Glu-P-1 or 2-amino-3,8-dimethylimidazo[4,5-f]quinoxaline (MeIQx). Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 3049-3055, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Takada A., Ohmori K., Yoneda K., Hasegawa A., Kiso M., Kannagi R. Contribution of carbohydrate antigens sialyl Lewis A and sialyl Lewis X to adhesion of human cancer cells to vascular endothelium. Cancer Res, 53: 354-361, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dejana E., Martin P. I., Lauri D., Bernasconi S., Bani M. R., Garofalo A., Giavazzi R., Magnani J., Mantovani A., Menard S. Endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule-1-dependent adhesion of colon carcinoma cells to vascular endothelium is inhibited by an antibody to Lewis fucosylated type I carbohydrate chain. Lab. Investig, 66: 324-330, 1992.[Medline]
-
Takada A., Ohmori K., Takahashi N., Tsuyuoka K., Yago K., Zenita K., Hasegawa A., Kannagi R. Adhesion of human cancer cells to vascular endothelium mediated by a carbohydrate antigens, sialyl Lewis A. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 179: 713-719, 1991.[Medline]
-
Kunzendorf U., Kruger K. S., Notter M., Hock H., Walz G., Diamantstein T. A sialyl-Le(x)-negative melanoma cell line binds to E-selectin but not to P-selectin. Cancer Res, 54: 1109-1112, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Montgomery K. F., Osborn L., Hession C., Tizard R., Goff D., Vassallo C., Tarr P. I., Bomsztyk K., Lobb R., Harlan J. M., Pohlman T. H. Activation of endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 (ELAM-1) gene transcription. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 6523-6527, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Whelan J., Ghersa P., Huijsduijnen R. H., Gray J., Chandra G., Talabot F., DeLamarter J. F. An NF-
B-like factor is essential but not sufficient for cytokine induction of endothelial leukocyte adhesion molecule 1 (ELAM-1) gene transcription. Nucleic Acids Res, 19: 2645-2653, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burrows F. J., Haskard D. O., Hart I. R., Marshall J. F., Selkirk S., Poole S., Thorpe P. E. Influence of tumor-derived interleukin 1 on melanoma-endothelial cell interactions in vitro. Cancer Res, 51: 4768-4775, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kaji M., Ishikura H., Kishimoto T., Omi M., Ishizu A., Kimura C., Takahashi T., Kato H., Yoshiki T. E-selectin expression induced by pancreas-carcinoma-derived interleukin-1
results in enhanced adhesion of pancreas-carcinoma cells to endothelial cells. Int. J. Cancer, 60: 712-717, 1995.[Medline]
-
Ye C., Kiriyama K., Mitsuoka C., Kannagi R., Ito K., Watanabe T., Kondo K., Akiyama S., Takagi H. Expression of E-selectin on endothelial cells of small veins in human colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 61: 455-460, 1995.[Medline]
-
Suzuki Y., Ohtani H., Mizoi T., Takeha S., Matsuno S., Nagura H. Cell adhesion molecule expression by vascular endothelial cells as an immune/inflammatory reaction in human colon carcinoma. Jpn. J. Cancer Res, 86: 585-593, 1995.[Medline]
-
Stanimirovic D. B., Wong J., Shapiro A., Durkin J. P. Increase in surface expression of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and E-selectin in human cerebromicrovascular endothelial cells subjected to ischemia-like insults. Acta Neurochir. Suppl, 70: 12-16, 1997.[Medline]
-
Garcia-Caballero M., Nunezed X., Castro I., Kusche J., Vora-Thorbeck L. Histamine metabolism in human breast and colorectal cancer: its effects on other host tissues. Adv. Biosci, 89: 273-287, 1993.
-
Jeziorska M., Haboubi N. Y., Schofield P. F., Wooley D. E. Mast cell distribution and tumour cell proliferation in colonic carcinoma. Gut, 34(Suppl.): S5 1993.[Free Full Text]
-
Katoh J., Tsuchiya K., Sato W., Nakajima M., Iida Y. Cimetidine and immunoreactivity. Lancet, 348: 404-405, 1996.[Medline]
-
Weese J., Ottery F., Emoto S. Do operations facilitate tumor growth?. An experimental model in rats. Surgery, 100: 273-277, 1986.
-
Kimura E., Koike T., Shimizu Y., Kodama M. Complexes of the histamine H2-antagonist cimetidine with divalent and monovalent copper ions. Inorg. Chem, 25: 2242-2246, 1986.
-
Uchida K., Kawakishi S. Cimetidine anti-ulcer drug as a powerful hydroxyl radical scavenger. Agric. Biol. Chem, 54: 2485-2487, 1990.
-
Lapenna D., De Gioia S., Mezzetti A., Grossi L., Festi D., Marzio L., Cuccurullo F. H2-receptor antagonists are scavengers of oxygen radicals. Eur. J. Clin. Investig, 24: 476-481, 1994.[Medline]
-
Read M. A., Whitley M. Z., Gupta S., Pierce J. W., Best J., Davis R. J., Collins T. Tumor necrosis factor
-induced E-selectin expression is activated by the nuclear factor-
B and c-JUN N-terminal kinase/p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways. J. Biol. Chem, 272: 2753-2761, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pietersma A., Tilly B. C., Gaestel M., Jong N. D., Lee J. C., Koster J. F., Sluiter W. p38 mitogen activated protein kinase regulates endothelial VCAM-1 expression at the post-transcriptional level. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun, 230: 44-48, 1997.[Medline]
-
Caivano M. Role of MAP kinase cascades in inducing arginine transporters and nitric oxide synthetase in RAW264 macrophages. FEBS Lett, 429: 249-253, 1998.[Medline]
-
Miyazawa K., Mori A., Miyata H., Akahane M., Ajisawa Y., Okudaira H. Regulation of interleukin-1ß-induced interleukin-6 gene expression in human fibroblast-like synoviocytes by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem, 273: 24832-24838, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Auguste, L. Fallavollita, N. Wang, J. Burnier, A. Bikfalvi, and P. Brodt
The Host Inflammatory Response Promotes Liver Metastasis by Increasing Tumor Cell Arrest and Extravasation
Am. J. Pathol.,
May 1, 2007;
170(5):
1781 - 1792.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Gout, C. Morin, F. Houle, and J. Huot
Death Receptor-3, a New E-Selectin Counter-Receptor that Confers Migration and Survival Advantages to Colon Carcinoma Cells by Triggering p38 and ERK MAPK Activation.
Cancer Res.,
September 15, 2006;
66(18):
9117 - 9124.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
F. Cianchi, C. Cortesini, N. Schiavone, F. Perna, L. Magnelli, E. Fanti, D. Bani, L. Messerini, V. Fabbroni, G. Perigli, et al.
The Role of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Mediating the Effects of Histamine on Cell Proliferation and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Production in Colorectal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2005;
11(19):
6807 - 6815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-M. Khatib, L. Fallavollita, E. V. Wancewicz, B. P. Monia, and P. Brodt
Inhibition of Hepatic Endothelial E-Selectin Expression by C-raf Antisense Oligonucleotides Blocks Colorectal Carcinoma Liver Metastasis
Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2002;
62(19):
5393 - 5398.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ando, T. Kawabe, H. Ohara, B. Ducommun, M. Itoh, and T. Okamoto
Involvement of the Interaction between p21 and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen for the Maintenance of G2/M Arrest after DNA Damage
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 9, 2001;
276(46):
42971 - 42977.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Laferriere, F. Houle, M. M. Taher, K. Valerie, and J. Huot
Transendothelial Migration of Colon Carcinoma Cells Requires Expression of E-selectin by Endothelial Cells and Activation of Stress-activated Protein Kinase-2 (SAPK2/p38) in the Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 31, 2001;
276(36):
33762 - 33772.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|