Cancer Research Cancer Medicine 8  2010 Workshops
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, N. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richard, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, N. O.
[Cancer Research 60, 4231-4237, August 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Nuclear and Mitochondrial Genome Instability in Human Breast Cancer1

Silvina M. Richard, Graciela Bailliet, Gerardo L. Páez, Martha S. Bianchi, Päivi Peltomäki and Néstor O. Bianchi2

Instituto Multidisciplinario de Biología Celular, La Plata, Argentina [S. M. R., G. B., G. L. P., M. S. B., N. O. B.], and Division of Human Cancer Genetics, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio [P. P.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We analyzed 40 pairs of breast normal/cancer tissues for the presence of mitochondrial (mt) genome instability and nuclear MSI in tumor cells. As mt, markers we used a (CA)n mt microsatellite (MS) starting at the 514-bp position of the D loop region and 4 informative MnlI sites located between the 16,108- and 16,420-bp positions of the D loop region. Nuclear microsatallite instability (MSI) was tested with 8 (CA)n MS, syntenic for the 13q chromosome arm. Moreover, we tested the spontaneous frequency of mtMSI and mt-MnlI mutations in 459 mother/descendant events. Mutations of mt-MnlI sites were found in 19 of 40 (47.5%) breast tumors, representing a 216-fold increase over the spontaneous rate in the female germline. Instability of the mtMS occurred in 17 of 40 (42.5%) breast cancers, which implies a 16-fold increase over the rate of spontaneous mutations. Nuclear MSI was found in 20 of 40 (50%) cases. In 15 of these cases the MSI was restricted to one locus, whereas in 5 instances the change of alleles was detected in 2 or 3 loci. Analysis of the correlation between mt and nuclear mutations showed no significant associations, suggesting that different systems are responsible for mt and nuclear genome instability in tumor cells. We propose that the two main mechanisms producing mtRFLP and mtMSI are damage by free radicals and error repair by the polymerase {gamma}, the first mechanism being a major cause of MnlI mutations and a secondary cause of mtMSI.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cancer is the result of a multistep mechanism that ends in malignant cell transformation. Despite the enormous progress made during the last decade in the understanding of the role of mismatch repair genes, oncogenes, and tumor suppressor genes, several aspects in the process of carcinogenesis still remain unclear. In this regard, the finding of mutations and deletions in the mtDNA3 of tumor cells has focused the attention on these cytoplasmic organelles as concurrent factors in the start or progress of tumors (1) .

mtDNA is transmitted from the mother to all children, but only the female descendants pass it on to the next generation. Accordingly, mtDNA molecules are haploid due to the lack of homologous molecules of paternal origin. The number of mt genomes per cell varies from a few (resting lymphocytes) to several thousands (oocytes), giving rise to mtDNA polyhaploidy in all cells. A significant amount of ROS is generated during mt OXPHOS. This increase in ROS concentration in the mt microenvironment, combined with the lack of the protective action of histones and a deficiency in mtDNA repair, gives rise to a rate of mt genome mutations 10- to 100-fold higher than the nuclear DNA mutation rate (2, 3, 4, 5) . The association of nonmutated and mutated mt subpopulations in the cells of an individual is identified as heteroplasmy; several degenerative diseases, apoptosis, and senescence are assumed to occur when mt mutations are disadvantageous and the number of defective mt genomes in the heteroplasmic cell population exceeds a certain threshold (6 , 7) .

Extensive mt genome deletions and base changes mainly involving purine transitions are the two types of mt mutations assumed to occur after the action of ROS; thus far, renal (8 , 9) , breast (10) , and colon cancer cells (11 , 12) have been reported to show a variable spectrum of ROS-induced mt mutations.

There is a variety of tumors exhibiting an abnormally high rate of spontaneous mutations that result from malfunction of DNA MMR genes and that is identified as nuclear genome instability. The most common form of nuclear genome instability is the appearance of novel, noninherited microsatellite alleles in tumor cells with persistence of inherited alleles in the normal cell counterpart. The first descriptions of MSI were reported in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinomas (13, 14, 15, 16) . Ever since, MSI has been found in several types of hereditary and sporadic tumors, including breast cancer (17, 18, 19) .

In normal individuals, starting at 514 bp of the mtDNA control region, there is a (CA)n microsatellite showing 5 haploid alleles differing in size by the number of dinucleotide repeats (Ref. 20 ; data in this report). Heerdt et al. (11) tested 24 pairs of normal/colorectal cancer tissues and found no allelic change in the mtMS.

Extending from 16,184 bp to 16,193 bp of the mtDNA control region, there is a poly(C) tract interrupted by a T at the 16,189 bp position (21) . One of the mt variants that usually occur in normal individuals is the appearance of an uninterrupted poly(C) tract due to a T->C transition at 16,189 bp; these cases, in addition to the T->C transition, also show by length heteroplasmies of the poly(C) tract that are matrilineally transmitted from the female ancestor to her descendants (22) . Some colorectal cancers carry the T->C transition and the poly(C) tract heteroplasmy in tumor but not in normal cells (23) , the T->C transition being the primary event and the poly(C) tract instability the secondary effect.

In this report, we analyze 40 pairs of breast normal/cancer cells. The rate of allele changes in the mt(CA)n MS of tumor cells determines the frequency of mtMSI. Moreover, we used 4 informative MnlI sites located between 16,108 bp and 16,420 bp of the mt control region (21) to detect RFLP between normal and tumor cells; the T->C transition at 16,189 bp is detected by the loss of one of the above sites. We also tested 8 MS loci to assess the rate of nuclear MSI in tumor cells. Furthermore, we analyzed the frequency of appearance of mtRFLPs and (CA)n mtMS allele changes in 459 mother/descendant events to estimate the spontaneous rate of mtMSI and mt-MnlI mutations in the female germline and to compare these rates with the rate of mt mutations in breast tumor tissues.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Samples.
We studied 40 pairs of normal/cancer breast specimens fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin. Normal and tumor tissues were identified by microscopy; cancer regions selected for DNA extraction showed >90% of abnormal cells. DNA from paraffin slices was extracted according to the method of Mashal et al. (24) . We also studied DNA samples from 40 CEPH families comprising 67 ancestral matrilineages and 459 mother/descendant events.

MtDNA Analysis.
The (CA)n microsatellite starting at 514 bp (21) was amplified with the primers and PCR conditions reported by Szibor et al. (20) . Microsatellite allele identification was performed by electrophoresis in 15% neutral polyacrylamide and Sybr-Green fluorescence. Allele nomenclature in the text and tables was based on the number of repeats (20) .

RFLP for MnlI sites [CCTC(N)7] was detected in a mtDNA fragment of 312 bp extending from the 16,108 bp position to the 16,420 bp position. Primers used were mtL16,108 5'-CAGCCACCATGAATATTGTAC-3' (forward) and mtH16,420 5'-TGATTTCACGGATGGTG-3' (backward). PCR conditions were 30 cycles with 56°C annealing temperature. According to the reference sequence of Anderson et al. (21) , the 312-bp fragment comprises five MnlI sites producing fragments of 118, 89, 39, 35, 28, and 3 bp (Fig. 1Citation , a). With the exception of the 3-bp fragment, which could not be identified due to its small size, all of the other fragments and their corresponding RFLPs (Fig. 1Citation , a–l) were detected by electrophoresis in 10% neutral polyacrylamide and Sybr-Green fluorescence staining. In the text, tables, and figures, the position of MnlI sites is identified by the position of the restriction site located 7 bp downstream of the end of the recognition site.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. MnlI RFLPs patterns. The site at the 16,417 bp position was not informative. Accordingly, the a–l patterns are based on the four informative MnlI sites. The a pattern corresponds to the reference sequence of Anderson et al. (21). MnlI sites are defined by restriction positions that are located 7 bp downstream of the recognition site of the enzyme.

 
All pairs of normal/cancer samples and all CEPH cases showing mt marker changes between the ancestor and a given descendant were tested 2–4 times to confirm the consistency of mt marker identifications.

Autosomal MS.
A set of eight (CA)n MS syntenic for the 13q chromosome arm were amplified with the primers reported by Deka et al. (25) . We used four duplex PCR reactions combining the primers for FLT1 and D13S197 (55°C annealing), D13S118 and D13S193 (55°C annealing), D13S121 and D13S71 (55°C annealing), and D13S122 and D13S124 (49°C annealing). Alleles were detected by electrophoresis in 15% neutral polyacrylamide and Sybr-Green fluorescence. Alleles are identified in the text by the number of repeats. Allele diversities reported in literature for each one of the MS are: FLT1, 19 alleles (156–200 bp); D13S118, 12 alleles (176–200 bp); D13S121, 15 alleles (150–180 bp); D13S71, 11 alleles (67–81 bp); D13S122, 28 alleles (75–113 bp); D13S197, 31 alleles (87–145 bp); D13S193, 18 alleles (119–151 bp); and D13S124, 10 alleles (177–195 bp) (25) . Cases showing allele changes between normal and tumor cells were tested twice to confirm the results.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
CEPH Families.
The mt (CA)n alleles observed in the 67 founder maternal lineages are indicated in Table 1Citation . Allele changes between the ancestor and descendant(s) were observed in three families (Fig. 2Citation ). In family 35, six of the eight F1 descendants showed allele changes. One case was homoplasmic, two other cases were heteroplasmic for two mtDNA subpopulations, and three were heteroplasmic for three subpopulations, one of which corresponded to the maternal ancestor allele (Fig. 2Citation ). In F2 of family 1408 (Fig. 2Citation ), the ancestral allele 7 changed into a homoplasmic allele 8 in one male descendant and into a 7/8 heteroplasmy in a female descendant. Finally, in family 1413, we observed one homoplasmic change that does not fit the pattern of maternal transmission (Fig. 2Citation ). Because the CEPH family repository is stored as Epstein-Barr immortalized lymphoblastoid cell lines (26) , we assume that the allele shifting in family 1413 was due to the process of immortalization. Allelic changes caused by lymphocyte immortalization have been reported by Weber and Wong (27) and Bianchi et al. (28) . Thus, if in heteroplasmies we count as mutations only those alleles differing from the maternal allele, we have a total of 12 novel MS alleles representing a spontaneous mutation rate of 2.6% (12 of 459) and a mutation rate due to lymphoblastoid transformation of 0.2% (1 of 459).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Allelic frequencies of mtMS

 


View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Genealogies of the three families showing spontaneous mutations of the mtMS. The mtMS mutation in family 1413 does not correspond to the pattern of maternal transmission. Numbers in circles and squares, mtMS alleles; h, heteroplasmy in these cases. The different mtMS alleles coexisting in the cell population are indicated below symbols. Mutated alleles are bold and with symbols delimited by thick lines.

 
The total number of MnlI restriction patterns detected in normal, tumor, and CEPH samples was 12; 9 of them corresponded to CEPH lineages. In only one of the CEPH lineages (family 2) did we observe that the ancestral restriction pattern b changed to pattern i (Fig. 2Citation ; Table 2Citation ). Accordingly, the spontaneous rate of MnlI mutations in female germline cells is 1 of 459 or 0.22%. We sequenced three randomly selected samples showing the T->C transition at 16,189 bp, and in all of them we found the poly(C) length heteroplasmy reported by Bendall and Sykes (22) . We conclude that in our series of normal/cancer pairs poly(C) instability is a constant event accompanying all cases with a T->C transition at 16,189 bp.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Frequency of MnlL RFLPs in CEPH lineages and in normal and tumoral breast tissuesa

 
We did not observe any case of heteroplamy during the analysis of MnlI RFLPs in CEPH samples. Zischler et al. (29) have reported that human chromosomes 11 carry a recent integration of a segment of the mt control region extending from 16,089 bp to 59 bp. The region we used to analyze MnlI RFLPs is part of the nuclear pseudomitochondrial gene reported by Zischler et al. (29) ; moreover, the mtL16,108 forward primer is homologous to the nuclear sequence, and the mtH16,420 backward primer differs from the complementary nuclear sequence by a single base located at the second 5'-position. Thus, the PCR reactions with these primers not only amplify the mt sequence but should also amplify the nuclear mt-like sequence. Nuclear mt-like fragments lack the MnlI recognition site at 16,189 bp due to a T->A transversion (29) . In case of equivalent coamplification of mt-like nuclear and genuine mt sequences, all samples having the MnlI 16,189 mt site would be heteroplasmic due to the coexistence of 89-bp + 35-bp fragments (presence of the site in the mt fragment) with a 124-bp fragment (lack of the site in the mt-like nuclear fragment). Because this is not the case, we conclude that due to the differential amount of targets (thousands of mtDNA targets per cell versus only two chromosome 11 targets per cell) the PCR fragment amplified is predominantly of mt and not of nuclear origin, a conclusion valid not only for CEPH families but also for normal/cancer breast tissue pairs.

(CA)n mtMSI and MnlI RFLPs in Normal/Cancer Breast Tissues.
Over a total of 40 normal breast tissues analyzed for (CA)n MS, we detected one heteroplasmic sample (case 4, alleles 5/6; Table 3Citation ). Accordingly, the total number of alleles detected in the 40 samples of normal breast tissues was 41. Table 1Citation depicts the allele frequency in normal tissues. The analysis of tumor sample counterparts showed allele changes in 17 of 40 cases (42.5%; Table 3Citation ). Eight of these cases exhibited a shifting from allele 5 in the normal tissue to allele 4 in the tumor tissue; 7 cases showed a 4- to 5-allele changes; one case had allele 5 in normal tissue and a 6/8 heteroplasmy in cancer cells (case 11; Table 3Citation ), whereas the remaining case was heteroplasmic for alleles 5/6 in normal tissue and homoplasmic for allele 5 in tumor cells (case 4; Table 3Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Mitochondrial MSI, mitochondrial RFLPs, and nuclear MSIa

 
The appearance of MnlI mutations was observed in 19 of 40 cases of breast tumor cells (47.5%; Table 3Citation ). Nine cases gained 1 and 10 cases lost 1 MnlI site with regard to normal tissues. If we combine MS and MnlI data, the mtGI observed in cancer tissues was 27 of 40 (65%).

Nuclear MSI.
To define MSI, we followed the recommendations and guidelines reported for colorectal cancers (30) . Thus, we identified as MSI any change in length produced by the insertion or deletion of one or more repeat units in tumor tissues MS as compared with MS alleles in normal counterpart tissues. MSI-L and MSI-H were characterized, respectively, by allelic changes in one locus (MSI-L) or in two or more loci (MSI-H) of the eight loci used. Cases in which the normal tissues showed two different alleles and tumor tissues showed only one of the alleles in normal cells (i.e., cases 1, 2, 20, and 23; Table 3Citation ) were not counted as MSI because we considered it difficult to clearly discern between loss of heterozygosity or MSI (30) . Using these criteria, we found 15 of 40 (37.5%) cases of MSI-L (cases 5, 6, 8, 11, 14, 15, 16,18, 20, and 23–28; Table 3Citation ) and 5 cases (12.5%) of MSI-H (cases 17, 19, 21, 22, and 30; Table 3Citation ). Approximately one-half of the mutated alleles showed length contraction and half-length expansion.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Frequency and Characterization of Nuclear MSI.
Data in the literature on the frequency of nuclear MSI in breast cancer range from 0% [7 loci analyzed (13) ] to 80% [8 loci tested (31) ]. Between these minimum and maximum rates, the frequencies reported are: 1.3% [8 loci tested (19) ]; 8% [11 loci tested (32) ]; 10.8% [12 loci tested (33) ]; 26% [7 loci tested (34) ]; 28.2% [7 loci tested 35 )]; 39.3% [8 loci tested (18) ]; 40% [11 loci tested (36) . Although the causes for these extreme range of frequencies are not totally clear, it seems obvious that the instability of the markers used probably plays an important role, mainly when we take into account that the type of MS tested by different authors varies from di- to tetranucleotides, the loci locations comprise a large number of chromosome regions, and the spontaneous rate of germline MS mutation reported in the literature varies from 2.3 x 10-5 (37) to 1.2 x 10-3 (27 , 37, 38, 39) per locus per gamete per generation for autosomal MS; 1.2 x 10-3 for Y-specific MS (28) ; and 1.5% per gamete per generation for the X-linked DXS981 MS (40) . Thus, results from different laboratories are not comparable.

We had no special reason to select the eight MS markers used in this report except that they are routinely used by our and other groups for population studies. One of the main peculiarities of this set of markers is that they do not follow the predictions of the single-step mutation model (25) . Thus, length contractions and expansions comprising more than one repeat are frequent (Table 3)Citation .

We found MSI in 20 of 40 (50%) of tumor cases. Liu et al. (41) have defined three different groups of cancer with MSI: group 1, cancers with a family history of malignancy, which usually show two or more loci exhibiting MSI (MSI-H); group b, tumors with MSI-H but with no family history of cancer; and group c, tumors with no family history of cancer and with a lower prevalence of MSI (MSI-L). According to these criteria, 15 of our cases correspond to the third group and 5 to the second group.

Malfunction of the two alleles in at least one locus of the MMR genes loci (hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS2, or hPMS1) has been documented in colorectal cancers of groups a and b (15 , 41) , and also, although at lower frequency, in endometrial and gastric cancers with MSI-H (42, 43, 44) . Therefore, by extrapolation it has been assumed that breast cancers showing MSI-H have also defective MMR genes (18) . On the other hand, no defective MMR genes have been detected in colorectal, endometrial, and gastric cancers with MSI-L (42 , 44 , 45) . MSI-L in these tumors has been explained by endogenous damage by ROS, exogenous factors including smoking and diet, and deficiencies in repair mechanisms not controlled by the major cohort of MMR genes (30) .

mt GI.
The presence of mtDNA mutations in tumor cells has been investigated in gastric (46) , breast (10) , and colorectal cancers (11 , 12 , 23) . A deletion of 50 bp extending from 298 to 348 bp was detected in 12.5% of gastric adenocarcinomas of the gastroesophageal junction (4 of 32 cases tested) but in none of the 45 cases having more distal gastric cancers (46) . Furthermore, of a total of seven cases of breast cancer in which the whole mt genome was tested for RFLP with the use of nine different restriction enzymes, five cases exhibited mutations in tumor but not in normal cells (10) . Heerdt et al. (11) sequenced a fragment of the mt-D loop (371–570 bp) and analyzed the appearance of allele changes in the (CA)n mtMS in 24 pairs of normal/tumor tissues of colorectal cancers, finding no tumor mutations. Polyak et al. (12) amplified by PCR and sequenced the entire mt genome in seven cell lines derived from colorectal tumors. Of the 88 mutations detected (4–31 per tumor cell line), 8 were present in protein coding genes and 4 in tRNA genes. To confirm whether these variants were specific of cancer cells or the result of the in vitro conditions, the authors tested the primary cancer cells from which the cell lines were derived and also the normal colon tissue counterparts. They found that 12 of the 88 mutations were specific of tumor cells. Eleven of these mutations were T->C or G->A transitions and one was a base insertion; 10 mutations were homoplasmic, and 2 were heteroplasmic for 2 mt genome subpopulations. Habano et al. (23) analyzed the (CA)n mtMS and the D loop poly(C) tract in 45 pairs of normal/tumor tissues from sporadic colorectal cancers. No mtMSI was detected in tumor tissues, whereas 20 cases (44%) of tumor cells showed instability of the poly(C) tract very likely produced by T->C transitions at the 16,189 bp position.

In the series reported here, we found 17 of 40 (42.5%) tumors showing mtMSI. Because the spontaneous rate mutation rate for this MS in female gametes was 2.6%, we conclude that breast tumor tissues had a 16-fold increase in the rate of mtMSI. Mutations of MnlI sites appeared in 47.5% (19 of 40) of cancer breast tissues and 0.22% of CEPH pedigrees; this represents a 216-fold increase in the mutation rate of cancer cells with regard to the spontaneous rate detected in female gametes.

Table 4Citation shows the lack of significance between the observed and the expected frequencies of nuclear MSI, mtMSI, and mtRFLP associations. Data in this table indicate that nuclear GI and the two forms of mtGI analyzed in this report are independent phenomena caused by abnormalities at different stages of the pathway leading to cell transformation.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Associations of nuclear MSI and mt GI

 
Origin of mtGI.
Increased damage by ROS and defective DNA repair are the two causes proposed to explain the mtGI in cancer cells (5 , 10, 11, 12 , 23 , 46) . Moreover, the same causes have been assumed to play a role in the induction of nuclear MSI in colorectal cancers and other tumors (30) . Although these factors are surely involved in the mt damage found in our series of cancer breast tissues, the importance of these mechanisms is different for each one of the mutations analyzed.

The mtDNA fragment tested for MnlI RFLPS is part of the D loop segment. This region has a triple-stranded DNA conformation and is the point of attachment of the mtDNA to the mt membrane (47) . All cases of breast cancers included in our series correspond to postmenopausal women whose normal breast cells were in a metabolic resting state due to the lack of hormonal stimulus. Breast cancer cells, on the other hand, exhibit an active OXPHOS pathway producing a marked increase of ROS (10) . These DNA breakdown products (lipid peroxides, alkoxyl radicals, peroxyl radicals, and aldehydes) mainly occur at the mt membrane level and preferentially damage the single chain of the triple-stranded DNA structure of the D loop (48) . The base repair process used to correct the damage in the mtDNA molecule is mediated by polymerase {gamma} (Pol {gamma}), an enzyme with decreased proof reading efficiency (49 , 50) . Thus, the combination of increased DNA damage by free radicals and deficient base repair by Pol {gamma} are the causes explaining the 216-fold increase of MnlI mutations detected in the D loop region of breast cancer cells.

Slipped strand mispairing followed by deficient repair are the mechanisms accounting for the origin of MS repeat variants (51) . Accordingly, in breast tumors, the nuclear and mtDNA replication resulting from the continuous cell cycling of transformed cells gives the basis for the appearance of slipped strand mispairing. In nuclear MSI-H, the homozygous malfunction in one locus of the cohort of MMR genes seems to play a fundamental role in the appearance of facultative MS allele changes. On the other hand, besides ROS damage, dietary components and smoking have been assumed to enhance MSI-L (30) , although the role played by these factors in the induction of slippage mispairing is not clear. The moderate increase of mtMSI in breast cancer cells with regard to the spontaneous rate observed in germline cells (16-fold versus the 216-fold detected in MnlI mtRFLPs) emphasizes that mtMS allele changes in breast cancer are mainly due to Pol {gamma} errors and, to a lesser extent, to ROS-induced DNA damage.

Homoplasmy of mt Mutations.
In human ovary carcinoma, the average of mitochondria per cell was 4.6, with 10 being the average of DNA molecules per mitochondria (52) . Although we do not have equivalent estimations for breast cancer cells, it seems reasonable to assume that the number of mtDNA molecules per cell probably ranges from a few hundreds to a few thousands. Damage to mtDNA by ROS and error repair by Pol {gamma} should occur at random, giving rise to cell heteroplasmies comprising multiple subpopulations of mutated mtDNA molecules. Yet, in our series, most tumor cells exhibiting mt MnlI variants or MSI were homoplasmic for the mutated DNA. Polyak et al. (12) also found that 10 of 12 cases of colorectal cancers showed mtDNA homoplasmic mutations. Two opposite hypotheses have been formulated to explain the predominance of homoplasmic versus heteroplasmic mutated mtDNA in cancer cells. According to the report of Shay and Werbin (1) , under particular environmental conditions, some of the mt mutations may result in selective advantage, enabling the cell(s) harboring the mutation to outgrow other cells in the population and also allowing the mtDNA with the advantageous mutation to outgrow other mt genomes in the cell. Conversely, Polyak et al. (12) proposed that mt genomes with mutations affecting their functional efficiency overreplicate to maintain a normal OXPHOS pathway by an increase in number. Over the thousands of generations required for the tumor to progress and expand, the most overreplicated mtDNA molecule(s) easily replace other mt subpopulations, giving rise to homoplasmy. Because all mt genes and markers are in linkage disequilibrium, the overreplicated mtDNA gives rise to homoplasmy, not only for the advantageous or disadvantageous mutations but also for all other mt markers associated with it.

Final Remarks.
By using eight autosomal MS, one mtMS, and four polymorphic mt MnlI sites, we were able to detect nuclear and/or mtGI in 35 of 40 (87.5%) breast cancers; a figure high enough to have importance for the diagnosis of malignancy. Damage by ROS and lipid peroxides combined with Pol {gamma} error repair seem to be the mechanisms subjacent for MnlI mtRFLPs. On the other hand, mtMSI seems to depend more on the Pol {gamma} mismatch repair than on damage by ROS. Although we did not find any correlation between the type of nuclear or mt damage detected and the pathology of the tumor cases analyzed (Table 3)Citation , in the future it would be advisable to extend these studies to explore whether the distinct types of mt and nuclear GI found in breast cancer cells may be correlated with different clinical forms or with different therapeutic responses and survival.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank M. Laguens for the provision of normal and tumoral samples and for the information on the pathology of cancers.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by grants from Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Comision de Investigaciones Científicas de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Técnólogica, and Liga Argentina de Lucha Contra el Cáncer of Argentina and NIH Grant CA82282. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at IMBICE, Calle 526 e/10 y 11, 1900 La Plata, Argentina. Phone/Fax: (54 221) 425 3320; E-mail: bianchi{at}satlink.com/imbice@satlink.com Back

3 The abbreviations used are: mtDNA, mitochondrial DNA; mt, mitochondrial; ROS, reactive oxygen species; OXPHOS, oxidative phosphorylation; MMR, mismatch repair; MS, microsatellite; MSI, microsatellite instability; CEPH, Centre d’étude du Polymorphisme Humain; MSI-L, MSI characterized by allelic changes in one locus of the eight loci used; MSI-H, MSI characterized by allelic changes in two or more loci of the eight loci used; GI, genome instability; Pol {gamma}, polymerase {gamma}. Back

Received 11/19/99. Accepted 6/ 1/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Shay J. W., Werbin H. Are mitochondrial DNA mutations involved in the carcinogenic process?. Mutat. Res., 186: 149-160, 1987.[Medline]
  2. Howell N., Kubacka I., Mackey D. A. How rapidly does the human mitochondrial genome evolve?. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59: 501-509, 1996.[Medline]
  3. Bendall K. E., Macaulay V. A., Baker J. R., Sykes B. C. Heteroplasmic point mutation in the human mtDNA control region. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59: 1276-1287, 1996.[Medline]
  4. Pääbo S. Mutational hot spots in the mitochondrial microsome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59: 493-496, 1996.[Medline]
  5. Khrapko K., Coller H. A., André P. C., Li X-C., Hanekamp J. S., Thilly W. G. Mitochondrial mutational spectra in human cells and tissues. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 13798-13803, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Wallace D. C. Mitochondrial DNA variation in human evolution, degenerative disease, and aging. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 59: 213-225, 1995.
  7. Lightowlers R. N., Chinnery P. F., Turnbull D. M., Howell N. Mammalian mitochondrial genetics: heredity, heteroplasmy and disease. Trends Genet., 13: 450-455, 1997.[Medline]
  8. Welter C., Kovacs G., Seitz G., Blin N. Alteration of mitochondrial DNA in human oncocytomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 1: 79-82, 1989.[Medline]
  9. Horton, T. M., Petros, J. A., Heddi, A., Shoffner, J., Kaufman, A. E., Graham, S.D., Jr., Gramlich, T., and Wallace, D. C. Novel mitochondrial DNA deletion found in a renal cell carcinoma. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 15: 95–101, 1996.
  10. Bianchi M. S., Bianchi N. O., Bailliet G. Mitochondrial DNA mutations in normal and tumor tissues from breast cancer patients. Cytogenet. Cell Genet., 71: 99-103, 1995.[Medline]
  11. Heerdt B. G., Chen J., Stewart L. R., Augenlicht L. H. Polymorphisms, but lack of mutations or instability, in the promotor region of mitochondrial genome in human colonic tumors. Cancer Res., 54: 3912-3915, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Polyak K., Li Y., Zhu H., Lengauer C., Willson J. K. V., Markowitz S. D., Trush M. A., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Somatic mutation of the mitochondrial genome in human colorectal tumors. Nat. Genet., 20: 291-293, 1998.[Medline]
  13. Peltomaki P., Ragnhild A. L., Aaltonen L. A., Pylkkänen L., Nystróm-Lahti M., Seruca R., David L., Holm R., Ryberg D., Brøgger A-L., de la Chapelle A. Microsatellite instability is associated with tumors that characterize the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal carcinoma syndrome. Cancer Res., 53: 5853-5855, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Thibodeau S. N., Bren G., Schaid D. Microsatellite instability in cancer of proximal colon. Science (Washington DC), 260: 816-819, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Aaltonen L. A., Peltomäki P., Leach F. S., Sistonen P., Pylkkänen L., Mecklin J-P., Järvinen H., Powell S. M., Jen J., Hamilton S. R., Petersen G., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., de la Chapelle A. Clues to the pathogenesis of familial colorectal cancer. Science (Washington DC), 260: 812-816, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Ionov Y., Peinado M. A., Malkhosyan S., Shibata D., Perucho M. Ubiquitous somatic mutations in simple repeated sequences reveal a new mechanism for colonic carcinogenesis. Nature (Lond.), 363: 558-561, 1993.[Medline]
  17. Toyoma T., Iwase H., Yamashita H., Iwata H., Yamashita I., Ito K., Hara Y., Suchi M., Kato T., Nakamura T., Kobayashi S. Microsatellite instability in sporadic human breast cancers. Int. J. Cancer, 68: 447-451, 1996.[Medline]
  18. De Marchis, L., Contegiacomo, A., D’ Amico, C., Palmirotta, R., Pizzi, C., Ottini, L., Mastranzo, P., Figliolini, M., Petrella, G., Amanti, C., Battista, P., Bianco, A. R., Frati, L., Cama, A., and Mariani-Costantini, R. Microsatellite instabilily is correlated with lymph node-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 241–248, 1997.
  19. Dillon E. K., de Boer W. B., Papadimitiou J. M., Turbett G. R. Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in mammary carcinoma and its probable precursors. Br. J. Cancer, 76: 156-162, 1997.[Medline]
  20. Szibor R., Michael M., Spitsyn V. A., Plate I., Ginter E. K., Krause D. Mitochondrial D-loop 3' (CA)n repeat polymorphism: optimization of analysis and population data. Electrophoresis, 18: 2857-2860, 1997.[Medline]
  21. Anderson S., Bankier A. T., Barriel G. G., De Bujin M. H. L., Coulson A. R., Drouin J., Eperon I. C. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature (Lond.), 290: 457-465, 1981.[Medline]
  22. Bendall K. E., Sykes B. C. Length heteroplasmy in the first hypervariable segment of the human mtDNA control region. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 57: 248-256, 1995.[Medline]
  23. Habano W., Nakamura S., Sugai T. Microstellite instability in the mitochondrial DNA of colorectal carcinomas: evidence for mismatch repair systems in mitochondria. Oncogene, 17: 1931-1937, 1998.[Medline]
  24. Mashal R. D., Lester S. C., Sklar J. Clonal analysis by study of X chromosome inactivation in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue. Cancer Res., 53: 4676-4679, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Deka R., Jin L., Shriver M. D., Yu L. M., DeCroo S., Hundrieser J., Bunker C. H., Ferrell R. E., Chakraborty R. Population genetics of dinucleotide (dC-dA)n. (dG-dT)n polymorphisms in world populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 56: 461-474, 1995.[Medline]
  26. Dausset J., Cann H., Cohen D., Lathrop M., Lalouel J-M., White R. Centre d’étude du Polymorphisme Humain (CEPH): Collaborative Genetic Mapping of the Human Genome. Genomics, 6: 575-577, 1990.[Medline]
  27. Weber J. L., Wong C. Mutation of human short tandem repeats. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2: 1123-1128, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Bianchi N. O., Catanesi C. I., Bailliet G., Martínez-Marignac V. L., Bravi C. M., Vidal-Rioja L. B., Herrera R. J., López-Camelo J. S. Characterization of ancestral and derived Y-chromosome haplotypes of New World native populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 63: 1862-1871, 1998.[Medline]
  29. Zischler H., Gelsert H., von Haeseler A., Pääbo S. A nuclear "fossil" of the mitochondrial D-loop and the origin of modern humans. Nature (Lond.), 378: 489-492, 1995.[Medline]
  30. Boland R. C., Thibodeau S. N., Hamilton S. R., Sidransky D., Eskleman J. R., Burt R. W., Meltzer S. J., Rodríguez-Vigas M. A., Fodde R., Ranzani N., Srivastava S. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 58: 5248-5257, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Fujii S., Takeshima Y., Arihiro K., Kaneko M., Inai K. Microsatellite instability in breast cancers with special reference to patients’ age and bilaterality. Hiroshima J. Med. Sci., 47: 89-97, 1998.[Medline]
  32. McCulloch R. S., Sellner L. N., Papadimitrou J. M., Turbett G. R. The incidence of microstellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in fibroadenoma of the breast. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 49: 165-169, 1998.[Medline]
  33. Wooster R., Cleton-Janser A-M., Collins N., Mangion J., Cornelis R. S., Cooper C. S., Gusterson B. A., Ponder B. A. J., von Deimling A., Wiestler O. D., Cornelisse C. J., Devilee P., Stratton M. R. Instability of short tandem repeats (microsatellites) in human cancers. Nat. Genet., 6: 152-156, 1994.[Medline]
  34. Sourvinos G., Kiaris H., Tsikkinis A., Vassilaros S., Sandidos D. S. Microsatellite instability and loss of heterozygosity in primary breast tumours. Tumor Biol., 18: 157-166, 1997.
  35. Rush E. B., Calvano J. E., van Zee K. J., Zelenetz A. D., Borgen P. I. Microsatellite instability in breast cancer. Ann. Surg. Oncol., 4: 310-315, 1997.[Medline]
  36. Rosenberg C. L., de las Morenas A., Huang K., Cupples L. A., Faller D. V., Larson P. S. Detection of monoclonal microsatellite alterations in atypical breast hyperplasia. J. Clin. Invest., 98: 1095-1100, 1996.[Medline]
  37. Edwards A., Hammond H. A., Jin L., Caskey T., Chakraborty R. Genetic variation at five trimeric and tetrameric tandem repeat loci in four human population groups. Genomics, 12: 241-253, 1992.[Medline]
  38. Hearne C. M., Ghosh S., Todd J. A. Microsatellites for linkage analysis of genetic traits. Trends Genet., 8: 288-294, 1992.[Medline]
  39. Kwiatkowski D. J., Henske E. P., Weimer K., Ozelius L., Gusella J. F., Haines J. Construction of a GT polymorphism map of human 9q. Genomics, 12: 229-240, 1992.[Medline]
  40. Mahtani M. M., Willard F. W. A polymorphic X-linked tetranucleotide repeat locus displaying a high rate of new mutation: implications for mechanisms of mutation at short tandem repeat loci. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2: 431-437, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  41. Liu B., Nicolaides N. C., Markowitz S., Willson J. K. V., Parson R. E., Jen J., Papadopolous N., Peltomäki P., de la Chapelle A., Hamilton S. R., Kinzler D. W., Vogelstein B. Mismatch repair gene defects in sporadic colorectal cancers with microstellite instability. Nat. Genet., 9: 48-55, 1995.[Medline]
  42. Katabuchi H., van Rees B., Lambers A. R., Ronnett B. M., Blazer M. S., Leach F. S., Cho K. R., Hedrick L. Mutation in DNA mismatch repair genes are not responsible for microsatellite instability in most sporadic endometrial carcinomas. Cancer Res., 55: 5556-5560, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Chong J. M., Fukayama M., Hayashi Y., Takizawa T., Koike M., Konishi M., Kinishi-Yanoshita R., Miyaki M. Microsatellite instability in the progression of gastric carcinoma. Cancer Res., 54: 4595-4597, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Keller G., Grimm V., Vogelsang H., Bischoff P., Mueller J., Siewert J. R., Hofler H. Analysis for microsatellite instability and mutations of the DNA mismatch repair gene hMLH1 in familial gastric cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 68: 571-576, 1996.[Medline]
  45. Dietmaier W., Wallinger S., Bocker T., Kullmann F., Fishel R., Rüschoff J. Diagnostic microsatellite instability: definition and correlation with mismatch repair protein expression. Cancer Res., 57: 4749-4956, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Burgart W. J., Zhen J., Shu Q., Stricker J. G., Shibata D. Somatic mitochondrial mutation in gastric cancer. Am. J. Pathol., 147: 1105-1111, 1995.[Abstract]
  47. Wallace, D. C., Lott, M. T., Torroni, A., Brown, M. D., and Shoffner, J. M. Report of the committee on human mitochondrial DNA. Hum. Gene Mapping, 813–845, 1993.
  48. Hruszkewycz A. H. Evidence for mitochondrial DNA damage by lipid peroxidation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 153: 191 1978.
  49. Kunkel T. A., Alexander P. S. The base substitution fidelity of eukaryotic DNA polymerases: mispairing frequencies, site preferences, insertion preferences, and base substitution by dislocations. J. Biol. Chem., 261: 160-166, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Pinz K. G., Shibutani S., Bogenhagen D. F. Action of mitochondrial DNA polymerase {gamma} at sites of base loss or oxidative damage. J. Biol. Chem., 270: 9202-9206, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Levinson G., Gutman G. A. Slipped-strand mispairing: a major mechanism for DNA sequence evolution. Mol. Biol. Evol., 4: 203-221, 1987.[Abstract]
  52. Satoh M., Koroiwa T. Organization of multiple nucleoids and DNA molecules in mitochondria of human cells. Exp. Cell Res., 198: 137-145, 1991.



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Ye, Y.-T. Gao, W. Wen, J. P. Breyer, X. O. Shu, J. R. Smith, W. Zheng, and Q. Cai
Association of Mitochondrial DNA Displacement Loop (CA)n Dinucleotide Repeat Polymorphism with Breast Cancer Risk and Survival among Chinese Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., August 1, 2008; 17(8): 2117 - 2122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W.-W. Jiang, E. Rosenbaum, E. Mambo, M. Zahurak, B. Masayesva, A. L. Carvalho, S. Zhou, W. H. Westra, A. J. Alberg, D. Sidransky, et al.
Decreased Mitochondrial DNA Content in Posttreatment Salivary Rinses from Head and Neck Cancer Patients
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2006; 12(5): 1564 - 1569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Mol. Diagn.Home page
J. P. Jakupciak, W. Wang, M. E. Markowitz, D. Ally, M. Coble, S. Srivastava, A. Maitra, P. E. Barker, D. Sidransky, and C. D. O'Connell
Mitochondrial DNA as a Cancer Biomarker
J. Mol. Diagn., May 1, 2005; 7(2): 258 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W.-W. Jiang, B. Masayesva, M. Zahurak, A. L. Carvalho, E. Rosenbaum, E. Mambo, S. Zhou, K. Minhas, N. Benoit, W. H. Westra, et al.
Increased Mitochondrial DNA Content in Saliva Associated with Head and Neck Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2005; 11(7): 2486 - 2491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
W. Zhu, W. Qin, P. Bradley, A. Wessel, C. L. Puckett, and E. R. Sauter
Mitochondrial DNA mutations in breast cancer tissue and in matched nipple aspirate fluid
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2005; 26(1): 145 - 152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
A. Maitra, Y. Cohen, S. E.D. Gillespie, E. Mambo, N. Fukushima, M. O. Hoque, N. Shah, M. Goggins, J. Califano, D. Sidransky, et al.
The Human MitoChip: A High-Throughput Sequencing Microarray for Mitochondrial Mutation Detection
Genome Res., May 1, 2004; 14(5): 812 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
L-J C Wong, D-J Tan, R-K Bai, K-T Yeh, and J Chang
Molecular alterations in mitochondrial DNA of hepatocellular carcinomas: is there a correlation with clinicopathological profile?
J. Med. Genet., May 1, 2004; 41(5): e65 - e65.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Tang, S. Baez, M. Pruyas, A. Diaz, A. Calvo, E. Riquelme, and I. I. Wistuba
Mitochondrial DNA Mutation at the D310 (Displacement Loop) Mononucleotide Sequence in the Pathogenesis of Gallbladder Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 10(3): 1041 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
M. Suzuki, S. Toyooka, K. Miyajima, T. Iizasa, T. Fujisawa, N. B. Bekele, and A. F. Gazdar
Alterations in the Mitochondrial Displacement Loop in Lung Cancers
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2003; 9(15): 5636 - 5641.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
V. Maximo, P. Soares, J. Lima, J. Cameselle-Teijeiro, and M. Sobrinho-Simoes
Mitochondrial DNA Somatic Mutations (Point Mutations and Large Deletions) and Mitochondrial DNA Variants in Human Thyroid Pathology : A Study with Emphasis on Hurthle Cell Tumors
Am. J. Pathol., May 1, 2002; 160(5): 1857 - 1865.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Nekhaeva, N. D. Bodyak, Y. Kraytsberg, S. B. McGrath, N. J. Van Orsouw, A. Pluzhnikov, J. Y. Wei, J. Vijg, and K. Khrapko
Clonally expanded mtDNA point mutations are abundant in individual cells of human tissues
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5521 - 5526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D.-J. Tan, R.-K. Bai, and L.-J. C. Wong
Comprehensive Scanning of Somatic Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., February 1, 2002; 62(4): 972 - 976.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Parrella, Y. Xiao, M. Fliss, M. Sanchez-Cespedes, P. Mazzarelli, M. Rinaldi, T. Nicol, E. Gabrielson, C. Cuomo, D. Cohen, et al.
Detection of Mitochondrial DNA Mutations in Primary Breast Cancer and Fine-Needle Aspirates
Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 61(20): 7623 - 7626.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Nekhaeva, N. D. Bodyak, Y. Kraytsberg, S. B. McGrath, N. J. Van Orsouw, A. Pluzhnikov, J. Y. Wei, J. Vijg, and K. Khrapko
Clonally expanded mtDNA point mutations are abundant in individual cells of human tissues
PNAS, April 16, 2002; 99(8): 5521 - 5526.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Richard, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, N. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Richard, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bianchi, N. O.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online