| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Institute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research), University of Essen Medical School and West German Cancer Center Essen, D-45122 Essen, Germany [A. K-R., A. B. K., B. U. K., M. F. R.], and Institute of Human Genetics, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 328, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany [C. F.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Rats of the inbred BD strains (11) provide an excellent model for the study of resistance to chemically induced carcinogenesis in the peripheral and central nervous system because these strains exhibit differential sensitivity toward the induction of neural tumors by pre- or perinatal pulse-exposure to EtNU4 (12 , 13) . Thus, BDIX rats develop malignant schwannomas, predominantly of the trigeminal nerves, with an incidence >85%, whereas BDIV rats are entirely resistant (12 , 14) . Schwannoma development is strongly suppressed in (BDIX x BDIV) F1 rats, consistent with a dominant resistance gene with decreased penetrance and/or with polygenic inheritance. On the basis of targeted linkage mapping in genetic crosses of BDIX and BDIV rats, we have recently reported a locus on chromosome 10 that is associated with susceptibility/resistance toward schwannoma development (14) .
A transversion mutation at nucleotide 2012 in the transmembrane region of the neu/erbB-2 gene is likely to be the initial event in EtNU-induced schwannoma development in sensitive strains of rats (15) .5 This mutation (16) is diagnostic of EtNU-induced rat schwannomas (15 , 17) and in the process of oncogenesis characterizes a subset of immature Schwann cells that are mainly located near the nerve-brain junction and exhibit unrestrained proliferative activity in contrast to their differentiating wild-type counterpart cells. neu-mutant Schwann cells are, therefore, at high risk of progressing toward the expression of fully malignant phenotypes.
Different from other animal models of strain-specific oncogenesis that rely on the detection of complex histomorphological alterations as premalignant lesions (10 , 18) , the identification of mutant neu-alleles in the DNA of microdissected trigeminal nerve tissue allows us to reproducibly quantify premalignant cells before any morphological changes become detectable as well as later on during the process of carcinogenesis. Because neu mutation-tagged cells can be followed regardless of alterations in cell morphology or cell migration, the rat model of EtNU-induced carcinogenesis in the trigeminal nerve is particularly well suited to gain insight into potential resistance mechanisms operating in a stage-specific manner.
In the present study, we have quantified the neu-mutant alleles in the trigeminal nerves of resistant BDIV and predominantly resistant (BDIX x BDIV) F1 animals in comparison with the sensitive BDIX rats as a function of time after exposure to EtNU on postnatal day 1 in parallel to histomorphological analyses.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of Histological Samples.
From postnatal day 30 onward, groups of 310 rats were sacrificed with
CO2 at defined intervals. The intracranial
portions of the trigeminal nerves were dissected out under a stereo
operation microscope, snap frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at
-80°C until cryosectioning (15)
. In most cases, both
nerves were used. Frozen sections (8 µm) were dried and stained with
Mayers hemalum.
Microdissection.
To reproducibly analyze trigeminal nerve tissue near the nerve-brain
junction known to contain neu-mutant premalignant cells
(15)
, this area was microdissected from hemalum-stained
longitudinal sections of the central nerve region. Adjacent brain
tissue and the meninges were removed with a sterile needle under the
stereo microscope, and a 1-mm-wide tissue specimen was then transferred
into a PCR tube.
Quantitative neu Mutation Analysis in
Microdissected Nerve Tissue.
Fluorescence-labeled PCR amplification of a 129 bp neu gene
fragment from microdissected material was carried out in a total volume
of 25 µl. Final concentrations of deoxynucleotide triphosphates were
0.2 mM. Primer 402e (5'-GCC AGC CCG GTG ACA TTC
ATC ATT G-3') and FITC-labeled primer 412 (5'-fluoro-GCA GCC TAC GCA
TCG TAT ACT TCC G-3'; Life Technologies, Karlsruhe, Germany),
respectively, were used at 0.1 µM
concentrations. Taq polymerase (Pharmacia Biotech, Freiburg, Germany)
0.5 units were added per reaction. Amplification was performed in a
Trio-Thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) in the dark,
using a profile of 0.6 min at 94°C, 1 min at 65°C, and 1 min at
72°C for 45 cycles, with a final 10-min extension at 72°C. For
quantitative restriction fragment length analysis, 1 µl of each PCR
product was digested with 0.5 unit of MnlI (recognition
sequence, 5'-CCTC(N)7; MBI Fermentas, St.
Leon-Rot, Germany) for 3 h at 37°C. 0.3 µl of the digested PCR
product was combined with 4 µl loading buffer, denatured at 90°C
for 10 min, and placed on ice. Samples were electrophoresed on
denaturing 6% polyacrylamide gels
[acrylamide:N,N'-methylenebisacrylamide, 19:1;
Ready Mix Gel, A.L.F. grade, Pharmacia Biotech] in TBE buffer on an
A.L.F. DNA Sequencer (Pharmacia Biotech).
For each sample, fluorescence-labeled fragments [wild-type allele (129 bp), mutant allele (104 bp)] were quantified by calculating the peak integrals (Fragment Manager program; Pharmacia Biotech), and their ratios were determined.
Statistical Analysis.
Each trigeminal nerve was regarded as an independent unit of
observation with respect to the fraction of mutant neu
alleles. Group comparisons were performed using the nonparametric
Wilcoxon test as implemented in SAS V.6.12 on PC. Pointwise Pvalues were reported.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A:T
transversion mutation at nucleotide 2012 of the neu gene was
detected by the resulting additional restriction site for
MnlI. Calibration was performed by measuring the ratio of
wild-type to mutant alleles in defined mixtures of a homozygously
mutant schwannoma cell line with a fibroblast cell line carrying
two wild-type neu alleles. The detection limit for reliable
quantitation of mutant alleles with an SD of <1% was 5%. Fig. 1
|
|
In EtNU-treated F1 animals,
20% of which had
been shown previously to exhibit trigeminal tumors (14)
, a
mixed type of kinetics was observed for the frequency of
neu-mutant alleles (Fig. 2C)
. Because no
significant difference between rats of both orientations of gender was
observed, the data were combined. During phase I, the great majority of
animals displayed values similar to those determined for BDIV rats
(median, 2.9%; minimum, 0%; maximum, 52%). During phase II, high
mutation frequencies were observed in a small subgroup of
F1 animals, similar to the values detected
previously in BDIX rats. However, most animals displayed low
frequencies of mutant alleles during phases II and III (median, 5.1;
minimum, 0; maximum, 85.1). None of the F1
animals had to be sacrificed before the time points originally
scheduled for analysis.
Histomorphological Observations.
The nerve-brain junction was examined histomorphologically in
trigeminal nerve sections from EtNU-treated BDIV, BDIX, and
(BDIX x BDIV) F1 rats, as well as
from untreated control animals. Time intervals were the same as those
used for mutation analysis, with the earliest time point at 30 days
after EtNU-exposure. neu-mutant cells typically appear as
multiple groups of irregularly distributed cells with an increased
nuclear:cytoplasmic ratio (early atypical proliferates; Refs.
15
and 20
).
Histomorphological observations paralleled the findings at the
molecular level. As exemplified in Fig. 3
, there was no visible difference regarding the frequencies and sizes of
early atypical proliferates in the susceptible BDIX and the resistant
BDIV rats up to postnatal day 70, whereas untreated control animals
neither exhibited morphologically altered cells nor atypical tissue
architecture. About 110 days later on, the frequency and size of nests
of atypical-looking cells had gradually increased and dominated the
nerve-brain junctional area in most of the EtNU-treated BDIX animals.
In contrast, the trigeminal nerves of BDIV rats had gradually became
devoid of the premalignant cells and at 180 days after EtNU-exposure
appeared almost identical to untreated controls. Most trigeminal nerves
of F1 animals (data not shown) were
histomorphologically indistinguishable from those of their BDIV
parents. In a few F1 rats, however, the number of
premalignant cells increased during phase II and finally gave rise to
full-blown schwannomas.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Using a combination of molecular and histomorphological analyses, we
have attempted to obtain information on the cause of the resistance of
BDIV rats to the development of EtNU-induced schwannomas, in contrast
to the high susceptibility of the BDIX strain. In BDIX rats, immature
trigeminal Schwann precursor cells exhibiting a T:A
A:T transversion
at nucleotide 2012 of the neu gene transmembrane region are
observed from a very early stage of carcinogenesis onward up to the
appearance of full-blown malignant schwannomas (15)
. These
cells are arrested in maturation and, contrary to their differentiating
neighboring cells, continue multiplying and, therefore, are at high
risk of progressing to the expression of fully malignant phenotypes.
The fate of these cells can be monitored along the process of
carcinogenesis in vivo. Comparative quantitative
neu gene mutation analyses of the trigeminal Schwann cell
population of BDIV, (BDIX x BDIV)
F1, and BDIX rats as a function of time after
exposure to EtNU, paralleled by histomorphological analyses, were thus
performed in the present study.
Limitations to an absolute proportionality between the amount of neu-mutant alleles and the number of initiated cells are: (a) the distribution of cell cycle phases in the target cell population; and (b) at a later stage of the carcinogenic process, loss of the wild-type neu allele, as detectable from around day 70 after EtNU-exposure onward.
The neu gene mutation at nucleotide 2012 in trigeminal Schwann cells of BDIV rats was first detected on day 30 after carcinogen exposure and further on throughout phase I (days 30100) of carcinogenesis (see "Results"). Surprisingly, the frequency of mutant neu alleles detected in BDIV trigeminal nerves during phase I was even higher than in the susceptible BDIX animals. This observation excludes resistance mechanisms based on a strain-specific differential frequency of mutational initiation, caused, e.g., by differential DNA repair capacity. Moreover, a smaller size of the BDIV target cell population, potentially attributable to a different timing of trigeminal development between the two strains, is also unlikely to play a significant role.
The results of the present mutation analyses are mirrored by the histomorphological appearance of BDIV versus BDIX trigeminal nerves during phase I. Around day 70, groups of small round atypical cells that carry the mutant neu gene, as shown previously (15) , accumulated near the trigeminal nerve-brain junction in both BDIV and BDIX rats. Both the frequency and size of these lesions were indistinguishable between the two rat strains. The identical histomorphological appearance of BDIV and BDIX trigeminal nerves during the early phase of carcinogenesis is evidence for the fact that the resistance of BDIV rats is effected by mechanisms acting during later steps in the carcinogenic process. Observations in other experimentally induced rodent tumors, e.g., 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced mouse colon tumors (7) and rat mammary tumors induced by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (8 , 9) , suggest a similar sequence of events.
During phase II (days 100260) of schwannomagenesis (see "Results"), a striking difference was observed between the trigeminal nerves of the two strains. In EtNU-exposed BDIX rats, the frequency of mutant alleles drastically increased up to peak values of >90%, reflecting the development of full-blown schwannomas with loss of heterozygosity for the wild-type neu allele (clearly confirmed by the histomorphology of BDIX trigeminal nerves on day 180). In contrast, neu-mutant Schwann cells gradually disappeared from the BDIV trigeminal nerves, and the mutation became undetectable after day 220. Accordingly, the histomorphological appearance of BDIV trigeminal nerves on day 180 closely resembled that of untreated control animals.
The resistance of BDIV rats is thus apparently attributable to the
elimination of neu-mutant premalignant cells. In most of the
(BDIX x BDIV) F1 rats, too,
neu-mutant cells disappeared during phases II and III.
However, in accordance with the fact that
20% of EtNU-exposed
F1 rats developed trigeminal schwannomas
(14)
, a subgroup of F1 animals
exhibited high levels of mutant alleles (up to 80%) in their
trigeminal nerves through phase II. Because of, perhaps, a second event
during oncogenesis [possibly BDIV allele-specific loss of
heterozygosity on chromosome 10 (14)
], these
neu-mutant cells may thus have been saved from the
BDIV-specific control mechanisms.
Various mechanisms could be responsible for the removal of initiated cells. Among these are host factors such as immunosurveillance as well as tissue-specific processes. neu-mutant initiated Schwann cells within the trigeminal nerve could, for example, be removed by cytotoxic T cells or natural killer cells. Recent work by Altenschmidt et al. (21) has shown that syngeneically transplanted BDIX schwannoma cells do indeed induce a specific T-cell response; but they simultaneously secrete factors, such as transforming growth factor ß, which inhibit T-cell proliferation, thereby enabling schwannoma cells to escape immunosurveillance (21) . A differential capability of premalignant Schwann cells to escape immunosurveillance might translate into differential susceptibility.
Alternatively, neu-mutant cells in BDIV trigeminal nerves, contrary to their premalignant counterpart cells in BDIX rats, might be induced to undergo apoptosis at a rate exceeding their proliferation rate and thus ultimately disappear. If initiated BDIV Schwann cells undergo apoptosis at an elevated rate, the molecular stimuli triggering this response at >100 days after carcinogen exposure will have to be identified as well as apoptosis-associated genes that might be functionally polymorphic between BDIV and BDIX rats.
Redifferentiation of glutathione S-transferase 7-7 positive preneoplastic foci induced in the liver of resistant Copenhagen (Cop) rats has been suggested to be a putative resistance mechanism (18 , 22) . This option can be excluded for the disappearance of premalignant neu-mutant Schwann cells in the trigeminal nerves of BDIV rats. Mutant alleles are no longer detectable at 220 days after carcinogen exposure, even further distal to the nerve-brain junctional area. The premalignant cells must, therefore, have been eliminated from the nerve tissue rather than having migrated out or differentiated. Our ongoing studies are directed toward clarification of the mechanism(s) responsible for the elimination of premalignant Schwann cells by functional and morphological analyses.
A phenomenon similar to the one described here has been observed regarding the resistance of Cop rats to the induction of mammary tumors by N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (10) . After exposure to N-methyl-N-nitrosourea, Cop rats developed characteristic preneoplastic lesions after a period of time corresponding to the time seen in the susceptible Wistar Furth (WF) strain. In this model, the cells of many lesions displayed an activating mutation of the Ha-ras gene in both the WF (75%) and the Cop rat (60%). Despite this fact, ras-mutant cells failed to progress toward malignancy and ultimately disappeared in the resistant strain (9 , 10) . Crosses with immune-deficient nude rats have shown that the resistance of Cop rats does not depend on the presence of T cells (23) .
Resistance to cancer development effected by the elimination of premalignant cells at postinitiation stages of carcinogenesis not only calls for clarification of the underlying mechanisms and identification of the responsible genes; it also invites cancer-preventive approaches based on the interference with intermediary stages in the process of carcinogenesis preceding the onset of the growth of malignant tumors.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by Wilhelm
Sander-Stiftung Grant 94.009.3 (to M. F. R. and A. K-R.), the Dr.
Mildred Scheel Stiftung für Krebsforschung, Grant W87/92/Ra 5 (to
M. F. R.), and the National Foundation for Cancer Research, USA,
through Krebsforschung International e.V. (to M. F. R.). ![]()
2 These authors contributed equally to this
work. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Institute of Cell Biology (Cancer Research), University
of Essen Medical School, Hufeland-Strasse 55, D-45122 Essen, Germany.
Phone: 049-(0)201-723-2803; Fax: 049-(0)201-723-5905; E-mail: rajewsky{at}uni-essen.de ![]()
4 The abbreviation used is: EtNU,
N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea. ![]()
5 A. Kindler-Röhrborn, B. U. Koelsch, and M.
F. Rajewsky, unpublished results. ![]()
Received 12/13/99. Accepted 7/19/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. M. Gering, J. A.M. Marx, K. Lennartz, C. Fischer, M. F. Rajewsky, and A. Kindler-Rohrborn The Interaction Mode of Premalignant Schwann and Immune Effector Cells during Chemically Induced Carcinogenesis in the Rat Peripheral Nervous System Is Strongly Influenced by Genetic Background. Cancer Res., May 1, 2006; 66(9): 4708 - 4714. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. U. Koelsch, A. Kindler-Rohrborn, S. Held, S. Zabel, and M. F. Rajewsky Loss of heterozygosity in malignant rat schwannomas chemically induced in hybrids of inbred rat strains with differential tumor susceptibility Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2002; 23(6): 1033 - 1037. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. A. Wood, J. E. Korkola, and M. C. Archer Tissue-specific resistance to cancer development in the rat: phenotypes of tumor-modifier genes Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2002; 23(1): 1 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Cell Growth & Differentiation |