Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cairncross, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cairncross, J. G.
[Cancer Research 60, 4812-4818, September 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Experimental Therapeutics

Differential Expression of Drug Resistance Genes and Chemosensitivity in Glial Cell Lineages Correlate with Differential Response of Oligodendrogliomas and Astrocytomas to Chemotherapy1

Catherine L. Nutt2, Mark Noble, Ann F. Chambers and J. Gregory Cairncross3

Departments of Oncology [C. L. N., A. F. C., J. G. C.], Pathology [C. L. N., A. F. C., J. G. C.], and Clinical Neurological Sciences [J. G. C.], University of Western Ontario, and London Regional Cancer Centre [C. L. N., A. F. C., J. G. C.], London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6, and Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 [M. N.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The two principal subtypes of glial neoplasms, astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas, exhibit striking differences in response to chemotherapy. This differential chemosensitivity might be explained by the specific genetic alterations causing gliomas but could also be attributable to specific properties intrinsic to the cells from which gliomas arise. To examine the possibility that chemosensitivity might be associated with lineage-specific properties of potential ancestors of these tumors, we explored: (a) the expression of drug resistance genes in rat glial cells; (b) the sensitivity of rat glial subtypes to the bifunctional alkylating agent, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea (BCNU); and (c) the effect of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and glutathione modulation on resistance to BCNU. Astrocytes, O-2A progenitors, and oligodendrocytes each displayed a unique pattern of expression of six drug resistance genes: MGMT, GST µ, GST {pi}, p53, MDR, and MT. Oligodendrocytes were more sensitive to BCNU than either astrocytes or O-2A progenitors. The increased resistance of astrocytes in comparison to oligodendrocytes was modulated, at least in part, by both O6-benzylguanine (BG) and DL-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine, suggesting a role for both MGMT and glutathione in the resistance of astrocytes to BCNU. The sensitivity of O-2A progenitors to BCNU following BG pretreatment is virtually indistinguishable from that of oligodendrocytes depleted of MGMT, suggesting that the down-regulation of MGMT is sufficient to account for the increased sensitivity of oligodendrocyte lineage cells to BCNU as they differentiate. These experiments provide support for the hypothesis that properties of glial cells retained in gliomas may contribute to the differential chemosensitivity of glial neoplasms.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The most common primary brain tumors in humans are the gliomas. There are two principal subtypes of glial neoplasms, each with strikingly different chemosensitivities. Astrocytomas are relatively resistant to DNA alkylating drugs (e.g., nitrosoureas), whereas 70% of oligodendrogliomas, including anaplastic (malignant) oligodendrogliomas, are exquisitely sensitive to the nitrosourea-based chemotherapy regimen, procarbazine/CCNU4 /vincristine (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7) . Because the outcome of treatment for these two types of glioma is so different, it is of considerable importance to understand what aspects of the biological history of these tumors might account for this differential sensitivity.

There are two very different possible explanations for the expression of chemosensitivity or chemoresistance in tumors. One possible explanation, and the one that currently takes precedence in analysis of this problem, is that these differences are attributable to alterations in gene expression patterns associated with the process of neoplastic transformation. According to this hypothesis, it would be expected that certain tumors acquire a chemoresistant profile as a result of aberrant gene expression that protects against cell death. Expression of such genes as bcl-2, multidrug resistance genes, certain members of the glutathione-S-transferase family, and an increasing number of other genes are associated with the expression of a chemoresistant phenotype (8, 9, 10) . As yet, there is no direct evidence that genetic alterations causing glial tumors are also chemosensitizing alterations, but recently Cairncross et al. (11) reported that allelic loss of chromosome 1p, an early molecular event in the genesis of oligodendrogliomas, is significantly associated with sensitivity to procarbazine/CCNU/vincristine chemotherapy.

Another possible explanation for the expression of chemosensitivity or chemoresistance in tumors is that these differences are reflective of the biology of the specific cells of origin. Such a possibility is of particular interest in respect to the differential response of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas to chemotherapy because of the observations that, at least in rats, tumors of the oligodendroglial lineage are preferentially induced after transplacental exposure to ethylnitrosourea (12 , 13) . This result is consistent with the possibility that the normal cells that have been thought to give rise to oligodendrogliomas may be especially vulnerable to the effects of this particular nitrosourea.

Sensitivity to nitrosoureas (BCNU, CCNU, and methyl-CCNU being the most common) is of particular interest in respect to glioma therapy, because these lipid-soluble drugs are capable of penetrating into the central nervous system for treatment of intracranial tumors. Of these, BCNU has been the most frequently studied chemotherapy agent in the treatment of glial tumors (14, 15, 16) . Many mechanisms of resistance have been implicated for BCNU. One of the best-studied mechanisms is the DNA repair protein MGMT (17, 18, 19, 20) . MGMT repairs DNA damage by removing alkyl groups from the O6 position of guanine, a critical site of alkylation by the nitrosoureas. In some cells, resistance to BCNU and other alkylating agents can be mediated by MGMT, and depletion of MGMT activity by BG has been shown to reverse resistance (21, 22, 23, 24, 25) .

A second mechanism of resistance to the nitrosoureas that has received significant attention is the detoxification pathway of glutathione and its associated GSTs. The tripeptide glutathione plays a role in detoxification by nonenzymatic conjugation of alkylating agents and other electrophilic molecules with its thiolate moiety (26) . This conjugation of drug with glutathione results in a more water soluble and less toxic product (27) . GSTs are a family of enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of these drugs, thereby enhancing the rate of detoxification. GST isoenzymes are broadly grouped into three classes (28) , and each isoenzyme class exhibits different but potentially overlapping substrate specificities. Glutathione and GST levels have been studied in human glioma tissues and cell lines, and support for a role of these pathways in resistance to alkylating agents has been provided (29, 30, 31) . In addition, modulation of glutathione has been demonstrated to alter resistance to a number of alkylating agents, including BCNU (29 , 30 , 32, 33, 34, 35) .

In the present study, we explored: (a) the expression of drug resistance genes in cultures of purified rat glial cells; (b) the sensitivity of rat astrocytes, O-2A progenitors, and oligodendrocytes to the bifunctional alkylating agent, BCNU; and (c) the effect of MGMT and glutathione modulation on resistance to BCNU in purified rat glial cells. We have found that there is an excellent correlation between the chemosensitivity of glial cells and the tumors to which they are thought to be related. In addition, the mechanisms that seem to be responsible for the differential response to BCNU also show an excellent correlation with mechanisms that are thought to play a role in the differing chemosensitivities of astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials.
DMEM, L15 medium, HBSS, FBS, antibiotics, and growth factors were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, Ontario, Canada). All other cell culture reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). BCNU was obtained from Bristol Laboratories of Canada (Montreal, Quebec, Canada). O6-Benzylguanine was kindly provided by Dr. Robert C. Moschel of the National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center (Frederick, MD). The anti-RAN-2 (36) and A2B5 antibody (37) hybridomas were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Anti-GC hybridoma cells (38) were raised previously by Dr. Mark Noble. Anti-GFAP antibody, rhodamine- and fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies, biotinylated antirabbit IgG, and 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid streptavidin were purchased from Dimension Laboratories, Inc. (Mississauga, Ontario, Canada). Radiolabeled nucleotides ([{alpha}-32P]dCTP and [{gamma}-32P]dATP) were purchased from Amersham Canada Ltd. (Oakville, Ontario, Canada). All molecular biology grade chemicals were obtained from BDH, Inc. (Toronto, Ontario, Canada), Fisher Scientific (Whitby, Ontario, Canada), Life Technologies, and Sigma Chemical Co.

Isolation of Astrocyte Cultures.
Astrocyte cultures were isolated from newborn (1–3 days of age) rat cerebrums using a method modified from McCarthy and De Vellis (39) . Cerebral hemispheres were isolated from unanesthetized Sprague Dawley neonates and dissected free of meninges and blood vessels. The tissue was minced and treated with 0.025% trypsin for 30 min at 37°C. Trypsin inhibitor with 40 µg/ml DNase was added and incubated for 5 min to stop the digestion of the tissue. The tissue was centrifuged in a Beckman Model TJ-6 centrifuge (Beckman Instruments, Inc., Fullerton, CA) for ~1 min at 1000 rpm, the pellet was resuspended in 40 µg/ml DNase and triturated in a 10-ml pipette to dissociate cells. The resultant single cell suspension was centrifuged at 1000 rpm for 5 min, resuspended in DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS and 50 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and seeded into polylysine-coated, 80-cm2 flasks (2 x 107 cells/flask). To remove contaminating cells, cultures were harvested after 48 h with 0.05% trypsin and 0.53 mM EDTA and replated. Cells were grown on coverslips for various time intervals under the above-mentioned conditions before being used for immunocytochemical analysis.

Isolation of Purified O-2A Progenitors and Oligodendrocytes.
Populations of purified O-2A progenitors and oligodendrocytes were isolated from 7-day-old rat corpus callosa using an immunopanning purification method modified from Mayer et al. (40) . Panning plates were prepared 1 day in advance by incubating 10 ml of Tris buffer solution (50 mM, pH 9.5) with 50 µg of goat antimouse IgG (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA) in a 10-cm Petri dish overnight at 4°C. The next day, each dish was washed three times with PBS and incubated with anti-RAN-2 hybridoma supernatant (1:4) in DMEM containing 0.8 mg/ml BSA for 1 h at 37°C. The addition of BSA was required to block the nonspecific adherence of cells to the panning plates. The dishes were then washed three times with PBS, and PBS was left on the dishes until they were required for panning. Twelve anti-RAN-2 plates were prepared for each litter of 12–18 rats.

Corpus callosa were isolated from six to nine Sprague Dawley neonates, minced finely, and incubated in 750 µl of 667 units/ml solution of collagenase in L15 medium for 45 min at 37°C. The tissue was then centrifuged at 1000 rpm in a Beckman Model TJ-6 centrifuge for 5 min and resuspended in 3 ml of a 30 unit/ml papain solution in DMEM containing L-cysteine and 0.013% DNase. This suspension was incubated for 1 h at 37°C, centrifuged, and resuspended in 1 ml of papain inhibitor solution consisting of 2 mg/ml ovomucoid and 1 mg/ml BSA in L15 medium. The tissue was then triturated sequentially through 23- and 27-gauge needles to yield a single-cell suspension. Two of these preps were performed in parallel for each litter of 12–18 rats. The corpus callosa cell suspension was resuspended in B-S medium (41) as modified by Lillien et al. (42) . This defined medium consisted of 5.6 mg/ml glucose, 5 µg/ml insulin, 100 µg/ml transferrin, 100 µg/ml BSA, 0.06 ng/ml progesterone, 16 µg/ml putrescine, 40 ng/ml selenium, 40 ng/ml thyroxine, and 30 ng/ml tri-iodothyronine in DMEM.

To deplete astrocytes and meningeal cells, the suspension was divided evenly into six samples and incubated on anti-RAN-2 panning plates for 30 min at 37°C. This incubation also depletes microglia and macrophages that stick via their Fc receptors to the original IgG coating on the panning plate. The plates were agitated gently at 15 min to ensure access of the panning surface to all cells. The nonadherent cells were transferred to a second set of six anti-RAN-2 plates for an additional 30-min incubation. All cells remaining in the supernatant were seeded into polylysine-coated, 80-cm2 flasks in B-S medium containing 0.5% FBS and 10 ng/ml each of PDGF-AA and bFGF.

O-2A progenitor cells were grown in the presence of 10 ng/ml each of PDGF-AA and bFGF to promote cell proliferation and prevent differentiation. To obtain pure populations of oligodendrocytes, O-2A progenitors were first grown to the required cell number. O-2A progenitors were then allowed to undergo differentiation into oligodendrocytes by removing bFGF from the medium. All medium was removed from the flasks, and the progenitors were washed once with citrate saline buffer (15 mM sodium citrate and 130 mM KCl). Fresh B-S medium containing 0.5% FBS and 10 ng/ml PDGF-AA was added to the flasks, and the cells were allowed to differentiate for ~4 days. The state of differentiation was monitored morphologically; oligodendrocytes displayed highly branched processes in contrast to the bipolar morphology displayed by O-2A progenitors. That such cultures consisted of >90% oligodendrocytes was confirmed by staining with cell type-specific antibodies. Because the oligodendrocytes began to undergo cell death within several days after reaching terminal differentiation, all experiments were completed within 1 week of the original change in morphology. In all cases, the requisite growth factors were replenished every 24 h. Both cell types were grown on coverslips for various time intervals under the above-mentioned conditions before being used for immunocytochemical analysis.

Immunocytochemistry.
Anti-GFAP antibody (rabbit IgG), A2B5 antibody (mouse IgM), and anti-GC antibody (mouse IgG3) were used to ascertain the percentage of astrocytes (GFAP-positive, A2B5-negative, and GC-negative), O-2A progenitor cells (A2B5-positive, GC-negative, and GFAP-negative), and oligodendrocytes (GC-positive, A2B5-negative, and GFAP-negative) in the pure cultures using a triple staining protocol. All dilutions and washes were carried out using Hank’s staining solution [HBSS without sodium bicarbonate, 5% calf serum, 4.76 g/l HEPES (Mr 238.3), 5.2 g/l HEPES (Mr 260.3), and 0.05% sodium azide]. Briefly, coverslips containing cells were washed once by dipping the coverslip in Hank’s staining solution, and cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15–20 min. After all subsequent incubations, the coverslips were washed by dipping in four changes of Hank’s staining solution. A mixture of 1/2 GC-1/2 A2B5 hybridoma supernatants was added for 20 min and washed off, and cells then were fixed in methanol for 15 min at -20°C to permeabilize the cell membranes. A mixture of anti-GFAP (1:300), antimouse IgG3-fluorescein (1:100), and antimouse IgM-rhodamine (1:100) was then added to the cells. Goat antirabbit biotin (1:100) was added for 20 min, followed by 7-amino-4-methylcoumarin-3-acetic acid streptavidin (1:50) for 40 min. After the final wash, coverslips were rinsed in distilled water, mounted onto slides with a drop of antifade [2.5% 1,4-diazabicyclo-(2.2.2) octane in glycerol], and sealed with nail polish. Cells were visualized with fluorescence optics on a Leitz Diavert inverted microscope (Ernst Leitz Canada, Ltd., Midland, Ontario, Canada), and culture purity was determined by counting the percentage of positive cells.

Northern Blot Analysis.
Sequences for oligonucleotide probes are as follows: MGMT, 5'-tttcttacca gcaattagca gccctggcag gcaaccccaa agc-3'; GST µ, 5'-cggcacgaat ccgctcctcc tctgtctctc cacacaggtg-3'; and GST {pi}, 5'-ggtaaccacc tcctccttcc agctctggcc ctggtcagcc-3'.

All cDNA inserts used for Northern hybridization were generously donated by other investigators. A 1.35-kb mouse p53 partial cDNA in pUC-18, designated pMO53, was a gift from Dr. Sam Benchimol (Ontario Cancer Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada). A derivative of pMO53, pECM53, has been described by Johnson et al. (43) . The hamster MDR cDNA in pUC-9, designated pEX/172 (44) , and the primers (A100 and B100) required to label the probe using a PCR protocol were kindly provided by Dr. Victor Ling (British Columbia Cancer Research Center, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada). The MT cDNA was generously provided by Dr. Jim Koropatnick (London Regional Cancer Center, London, Ontario, Canada).

Total RNA was isolated from cultured cells using TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Burlington, Ontario, Canada), following the manufacturer’s instructions. Selection of mRNA was performed using Oligo(dT) Cellulose Columns (Life Technologies). As described (45) , samples and molecular weight markers (0.24–9.5 kb; Life Technologies) were electrophoresed at 50 mA for 3–4 h in 1.1% agarose gels containing formaldehyde; mRNA then was transferred to Gene Screen Plus membranes (DuPont Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada) in 10x SSC buffer (1.5 M NaCl, 0.15 M sodium citrate, pH 7.0) by capillary action.

To block nonspecific binding, membranes were prehybridized in a VWR Scientific Model 2710 hybridization oven (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) at 42°C in a buffer containing 50% formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1% SDS, 1 M NaCl and 100 µg/ml herring sperm DNA. After 1–4 h, radiolabeled probe (106 cpm/ml) was added to the prehybridization solution and incubated with constant rotation for 16–20 h at 42°C. 5'-Labeling of oligonucleotide probes was carried out with T4 polynucleotide kinase, and labeling of cDNA probes was performed using the Life Technologies Random Primers DNA Labeling System, following the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). A PCR-based method was used to label the pEX/172 (MDR) cDNA probe (44) . Subsequently, probe-specific washing procedures were followed.

Membranes were exposed to a Storage Phosphor Screen (Molecular Dynamics, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), screens were scanned by a Personal Densitometer SI Model 375A (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.), and images were quantitated using ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics, Inc.). All images were below saturation and corrected for background. Expression of standard control probes, ß-actin and glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, varied slightly with the degree of differentiation of oligodendrocyte lineage cells (data not shown); as such, quantified signal intensities for each probe were normalized to a poly-dT probe. Images were assembled into composites using CorelDraw software (Corel Corp., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada), and signal intensity data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel software (Microsoft Canada, Inc., Mississauga, Ontario, Canada).

Cytotoxicity Analysis.
BCNU was dissolved in absolute alcohol and diluted to 3.3 mg/ml with sterile water. The stock solution was stored at -80°C, and subsequent dilutions were made with culture medium at the time of cell treatment. BG stock solution (100 mM) was made in filter-sterilized DMSO and stored at -80°C. At the time of use, BG was diluted to 1 mM in PBS, and subsequent dilutions were made with culture medium. Twenty-five µM BSO was prepared in medium at the time of treatment.

To test for cytotoxicity, 96-well plates were seeded at 104 cells/well and incubated at 37°C. Forty-eight h later, cells were treated and incubated for an additional 96 h, at which time cytotoxicity was measured using the MTT assay. BCNU treatments were performed for 2 h. On the basis of previous reports, pretreatment with modulators consisted of a 2-h incubation for BG (46) and a 24-h incubation for BSO (47 , 48) to modulate MGMT and glutathione, respectively.

The toxic effects of the above treatments were compared using the MTT assay as modified for chemosensitivity testing as described by Cole (49) . Ninety-six h after treatment, 100 µl of medium were removed, 25 µl of MTT solution (2 mg/ml in PBS) were added, and the plates were incubated for 2 h at 37°C. To solubilize formazan crystals, 0.04 M hydrochloric acid in isopropanol was added to each well and mixed thoroughly. Plates were kept at 37°C for 1 h, and cell viability was quantified by measuring light absorbance (570 nm) in a Bio-Rad Model 3550 automated microplate reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA). To control for differential growth rates, dose-response curves were normalized by expressing absorbance values relative to nontreated control values. Cytotoxicity assay results were analyzed using the two-tailed t test for independent means.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Characterization of Cultures of Purified Rat Glial Cells.
The cellular composition of the cultures was determined at the time of assay by immunocytochemical analysis with cell type-specific antibodies. Astrocyte cultures (GFAP-positive, A2B5-negative, and GC-negative) were >95% pure. O-2A progenitors (A2B5-positive, GFAP-negative, and GC-negative) were cultured to a purity >95% and oligodendrocytes (GC-positive, A2B5-negative, and GFAP-negative) to a purity >90%.

Genes Associated with Chemoresistance Are Expressed at Different Levels in Different Glial Cell Populations.
To explore the expression of drug resistance genes in cultures of purified glia, RNA was isolated from astrocytes, O-2A progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes, poly(A) selected, and subjected to Northern blot analysis. The Northern blots were probed for MGMT, GST µ, GST {pi}, p53, MDR, and MT transcripts (Fig. 1)Citation . Hybridization signals were normalized to a poly-dT probe (data not shown). A differential pattern of mRNA expression was observed for each of the six probes. Among differentiated glial cells (i.e., astrocytes and oligodendrocytes), expression levels of MGMT, p53, and MDR mRNA were higher in astrocytes; astrocytes displayed a 5-fold increase in both MGMT and MDR expression over oligodendrocytes; and an approximate 2-fold increase was exhibited in p53 expression. In comparison, expression levels of GST µ and MT mRNAs were slightly higher in oligodendrocytes than in astrocytes.



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Differential expression of drug resistance genes in cultures of purified glial cells. RNA was isolated from astrocytes, O-2A progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes, poly(A) selected, and subjected to Northern blot analysis. A differential pattern of mRNA expression was observed for each of the six probes.

 
Within the oligodendroglial lineage, we observed changes in expression levels of several genes as O-2A progenitor cells differentiated into oligodendrocytes. Progenitor cells displayed higher levels of MGMT, GST {pi}, p53, and MDR expression as compared with oligodendrocytes (Fig. 1)Citation . Progenitors displayed an ~5-fold increase in MGMT expression over oligodendrocytes, GST {pi} and p53 expression in progenitors was approximately twice that of oligodendrocytes, and an ~3.5-fold higher level of MDR expression was displayed over oligodendrocytes. In contrast, oligodendrocytes displayed a higher level of expression of GST µ and MT mRNAs; the expression of GST µ was approximately twice that seen in O-2A progenitor cells, and MT mRNA levels were slightly higher in oligodendrocytes than in the progenitor cells from which they were derived.

Two mRNA transcripts were detected for each of p53 and MDR. Although two transcripts have not been demonstrated previously in rat tissue, alternatively spliced forms of p53 have been documented in mouse tissues (50 , 51) . Two transcripts have been detected previously for MDR in rat and are known to correspond to the MDR1a and MDR1b genes (larger and smaller transcripts respectively; Ref. 52 ).

Oligodendrocytes Are More Sensitive to Killing by BCNU Than Are O-2A Progenitor Cells or Astrocytes.
To explore the potential functional consequences of differential expression of drug resistance genes in glial cells, we next examined the effect of BCNU treatment on the viability of purified rat glial cells. It had been observed previously that mixed cultures of rat cells from the oligodendrocyte lineage were more sensitive to the bifunctional alkylating agent BCNU than astrocytes (53) . To expand upon this finding, we determined the sensitivity of purified rat astrocytes, O-2A progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes to treatment with BCNU. Cells were isolated from newborn rats and treated with increasing concentrations of BCNU, and cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. Oligodendrocytes were more sensitive to BCNU than either astrocytes or O-2A progenitor cells (Fig. 2)Citation . Astrocytes appeared somewhat more sensitive to BCNU than O-2A progenitors, but this difference did not reach statistical significance.



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of BCNU treatment on purified rat astrocytes, O-2A progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes. Both astrocytes and O-2A progenitor cells displayed greater resistance to BCNU than did oligodendrocytes. O-2A progenitor cells exhibited a trend toward increased resistance to BCNU when compared with astrocytes, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. The survival of untreated cells was normalized to a value of 1.0. Symbols represent the mean of at least three independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. •, astrocytes; {blacktriangleup}, O-2A progenitors; {blacksquare}, oligodendrocytes. Bars, SE; asterisks, level of statistical significance (* *, P < 0.005).

 
Because oligodendrocytes and O-2A progenitor cells are grown in chemically defined medium, we determined whether growth in such medium might account for the differential sensitivity of oligodendrocytes to BCNU. When astrocytes were grown in the same medium used for growth of oligodendrocyte lineage cells, no difference was seen in their response to BCNU (data not shown).

Sensitivity of Astrocytes to BCNU Can Be Induced by Depletion of MGMT Activity or by Inhibition of Glutathione Synthesis.
There may be many reasons for resistance of astrocytes to BCNU. On the basis of previous studies, however, levels of MGMT activity and levels of glutathione were of particular interest. Rat astrocyte cultures have been found previously to have 3-fold higher levels of MGMT activity than mixed cultures of oligodendrocyte lineage cells (53) . Moreover, modulation of glutathione levels has been demonstrated to alter resistance to a number of alkylating agents, including BCNU (29 , 30 , 32, 33, 34, 35) . In this regard, it is potentially relevant that Thorburne and Juurlink (54) demonstrated that astrocytes had 3-fold higher glutathione concentrations than O-2A progenitor cells.

Analysis of the effects of BG and BSO on BCNU sensitivity in astrocytes indicates that depleting MGMT activity or inhibiting glutathione production both increase sensitivity to this alkylating agent. Cells were pretreated with 25 µM BG (to deplete MGMT activity) for 2 h and exposed to increasing concentrations of BCNU, and cell viability was determined using the MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 3ACitation , such treatment increased significantly the sensitivity of astrocytes to BCNU. Similar results were obtained by treating astrocytes with BSO to inhibit glutathione synthesis. As shown in Fig. 3BCitation , a 24-h pretreatment with 25 µM BSO was also associated with a significant increase in sensitivity of these cells to treatment with BCNU.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of BG and BSO pretreatment on the response of rat astrocytes to BCNU. Astrocytes were pretreated with either 25 µM BG for 2 h (A) or 25 µM BSO for 24 h (B) and then exposed to increasing concentrations of BCNU. Both BG and BSO pretreatment increased significantly the sensitivity of astrocytes to BCNU. Symbols represent the mean of at least two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. •, astrocytes treated with BCNU alone; {blacksquare}, BG or BSO pretreatment. Bars, SE; asterisks, level of statistical significance (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.005).

 
Effect of BG Pretreatment on the Sensitivity of Purified O-2A Progenitors and Oligodendrocytes to BCNU.
In light of previous reports that O-2A progenitor cells have low glutathione levels as compared with astrocytes (54) and our own finding that MGMT activity is higher in O-2A progenitor cells than in oligodendrocytes, we determined whether depletion of MGMT activity with BG might render O-2A progenitor cells as sensitive as oligodendrocytes to BCNU. We found that pretreatment of O-2A progenitor cells with 25 µM BG for 2 h was sufficient to significantly increase the sensitivity of these cells to BCNU (Fig. 4)Citation . BG pretreatment also somewhat increased the sensitivity of oligodendrocytes to BCNU, although to a lesser extent than was seen with O-2A progenitor cells (Fig. 4ACitation , and 4B)Citation . Interestingly, after negating the effects of MGMT on drug resistance by pretreatment with BG, O-2A progenitors and oligodendrocytes had similar sensitivities to BCNU (Fig. 4C)Citation .



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of BG pretreatment on the response of purified rat O-2A progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes to BCNU. O-2A progenitor cells (A) and oligodendrocytes (B) were pretreated with 25 µM BG for 2 h and then exposed to increasing concentrations of BCNU. BG pretreatment appeared to increase the sensitivity to BCNU of both cell types. Interestingly, after negating the effects of MGMT on drug resistance by pretreatment with BG, O-2A progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes had similar sensitivities to BCNU (C). Symbols represent the means of at least two independent experiments, each performed in triplicate. •, cells treated with BCNU alone; {blacksquare}, BG pretreatment. Bars, SE; asterisks, level of statistical significance (*, P < 0.05).

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In this study, we have documented differential expression of drug resistance genes in astrocytes, O-2A progenitor cells, and oligodendrocytes. These findings lend credence to the hypothesis that properties intrinsic to the cells from which gliomas arise, if retained, may contribute to the differential chemosensitivities of glial neoplasms.

The lineage origin of oligodendrogliomas has been a topic of interest for many years and remains uncertain. Previous studies have suggested that oligodendrogliomas may express some properties of O-2A lineage cells (55) . More recent evidence that tumors of this classification express NG2 proteoglycan and the PDGF-{alpha} receptor (which are expressed by O-2A progenitor cells) lends support to the view that, as implied by their name, oligodendrogliomas may indeed be related to the oligodendrocyte lineage (56 , 57) . Thus, it is becoming clearer that consideration of the properties of cells of the O-2A lineage may provide information of relevance to understanding the properties of oligodendrogliomas.

A differential pattern of mRNA expression was observed for each of the six drug resistance genes that we examined: MGMT, GST µ, GST {pi}, p53, MDR, and MT. Rat astrocytes expressed higher levels of MGMT, p53, and MDR than oligodendrocytes. The results for MGMT are consistent with our previous observations of increased MGMT activity in rat astrocytes relative to mixed cultures of oligodendrocyte lineage cells (53) .

One of the best-studied mechanisms of resistance to BCNU is MGMT (17, 18, 19, 20) . MGMT levels show a striking correlation with responsiveness to BCNU in patient populations (58) . In addition, it has been found that levels of MGMT in oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligo-astrocytomas are significantly lower than in astroglial tumors (59) . Because MGMT protein activity has been found to correlate with resistance to BCNU in cultures of mixed glial cells (53) , the effect of pretreatment with the modulator, BG, on the sensitivity of astrocytes to BCNU was determined. BG pretreatment significantly increased the sensitivity of astrocytes to BCNU, consistent with the hypothesis that this protein is important in conferring resistance to these cells. It was interesting to see, however, that astrocytes treated with BG nevertheless remained more resistant to BCNU than untreated oligodendrocytes. From these experiments, we conclude that MGMT contributes to the resistance of rat astrocytes to BCNU, but that other mechanisms of resistance also must be operative in these cells.

We suggest that a second component of BCNU resistance in astrocytes is related to levels of glutathione in these cells, which have elsewhere been shown to be higher than in O-2A progenitor cells (54) . Modulation of glutathione has been demonstrated to alter resistance to a number of alkylating agents, including BCNU (29 , 30 , 32, 33, 34, 35) . For this reason, the effect of BSO pretreatment on the sensitivity of astrocytes was examined. BSO, an inhibitor of {gamma}-glutamyl cysteine synthetase (the rate-limiting enzyme in glutathione biosynthesis), has been shown to cause depletion of cellular glutathione levels (30 , 32, 33, 34 , 48) . BSO pretreatment increased the sensitivity of astrocytes to BCNU, suggesting that the glutathione-GST detoxification system, or some other aspect of glutathione physiology, may also play a role in the resistance of astrocytes to BCNU.

We also were surprised to find that sensitivity to BCNU treatment increases as O-2A progenitors differentiate into oligodendrocytes. Because MGMT levels were 5-fold higher in O-2A progenitor cells than in oligodendrocytes, we examined the effect of MGMT modulation on sensitivity to BCNU in purified cultures of O-2A progenitor cells and oligodendrocytes. BG pretreatment appeared to increase the sensitivity of both cell types to BCNU, although a greater increase in sensitivity was observed in the cultures of O-2A progenitors. These results suggested that MGMT contributes to BCNU resistance in cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage. Interestingly, the sensitivity of O-2A progenitors to BCNU after BG pretreatment is virtually indistinguishable from that of oligodendrocytes depleted of MGMT, suggesting that the down-regulation of MGMT is sufficient to account for the increased sensitivity of oligodendrocyte lineage cells to BCNU as they differentiate. If our general hypothesis that cellular lineage contributes to chemoresponsiveness is correct, then it will be of interest in future studies to determine whether the levels of MGMT in oligodendrogliomas or oligo-astrocytomas correlate with the extent to which maturation is precluded in these tumors.

In summary, we have demonstrated that rat glial cell subtypes exhibit differential expression of a number of drug resistance genes. In addition, it was determined that rat glial cell subtypes display a differential sensitivity to the alkylating agent BCNU. The increased resistance of astrocytes in comparison to oligodendrocytes was modulated, at least in part, by both BG and BSO, suggesting a role for both MGMT and glutathione in the resistance of astrocytes to BCNU. Thus, the sensitivity of normal rat glial cells to BCNU appeared to be dependent on more than one mechanism of drug resistance. Our experiments provide support for the hypothesis that the fundamental properties of glial cells may be retained in gliomas and may contribute to the differential chemosensitivity of glial neoplasms.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Margot Mayer-Proschel for assistance in culturing oligodendrocytes and their progenitors, Sylvia Hill for technical assistance, and Karl Swartz for help with data processing.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Grant A178 from the London Regional Cancer Centre Endowment Fund and Grant MOP37849 from the Medical Research Council of Canada. C. L. N. received an Ontario Graduate Scholarship for this work and is currently a Research Fellow of the National Cancer Institute of Canada supported with funds provided by the Terry Fox Run. Back

2 Present address: Section of Neurobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at London Regional Cancer Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario, N6A 4L6 Canada. Back

4 The abbreviations used are: CCNU, 1-(2-chloroethyl)-3-cyclohexyl-1-nitrosourea; anti-RAN-2, anti-rat neural antigen-2; BCNU, 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea; bFGF, basic fibroblast growth factor; BG, O6-benzylguanine; B-S, Bottenstein-Sato; BSO, DL-buthionine-(S,R)-sulfoximine; FBS, fetal bovine serum; GC, galactocerebroside; GFAP, glial fibrillary acidic protein; GST, glutathione-S-transferase; MDR, multidrug resistance; MGMT, O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase; MT, metallothionein; MTT, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; O-2A, oligodendrocyte-type-2 astrocyte; PDGF, platelet-derived growth factor. Back

Received 2/24/00. Accepted 7/ 5/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Cairncross J. G., Macdonald D. R. Successful chemotherapy for recurrent malignant oligodendroglioma. Ann. Neurol., 23: 360-364, 1988.[Medline]
  2. Macdonald D. R., Gaspar L. E., Cairncross J. G. Successful chemotherapy for newly diagnosed aggressive oligodendroglioma. Ann. Neurol., 27: 573-574, 1990.[Medline]
  3. Glass J., Hochberg F. H., Gruber M. L., Louis D. N., Smith D., Rattner B. The treatment of oligodendrogliomas and mixed oligodendroglioma-astrocytomas with PCV chemotherapy. J. Neurosurg., 76: 741-745, 1992.[Medline]
  4. Cairncross J. G. Aggressive oligodendroglioma: a chemosensitive tumor. Recent Results Cancer Res., 135: 127-133, 1994.[Medline]
  5. Cairncross G., Macdonald D., Ludwin S., Lee D., Cascino T., Buckner J., Fulton D., Dropcho E., Stewart D., Schold C., Jr., Wainman N., Eisenhauer E. Chemotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma. J. Clin. Oncol., 12: 2013-2021, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Kim L., Hochberg F. H., Thornton A. F., Harsh G. R., Patel H., Finkelstein D., Louis D. N. Procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy for grade III and grade IV oligoastrocytomas. J. Neurosurg., 85: 602-607, 1996.[Medline]
  7. Mason W. P., Krol G. S., De Angelis L. M. Low-grade oligodendroglioma responds to chemotherapy. Neurology, 46: 203-207, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ali-Osman F., Brunner J. M., Kutluk T. M., Hess K. Prognostic significance of glutathione S-transferase {pi} expression and subcellular localization in human gliomas. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 2253-2261, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. El-Deiry W. S. Role of oncogenes in resistance and killing by cancer therapeutic agents. Curr. Opin. Oncol., 9: 79-87, 1997.[Medline]
  10. Serrone L., Hersey P. The chemoresistance of human malignant melanoma: an update. Melanoma Res., 9: 51-58, 1999.[Medline]
  11. Cairncross J. G., Ueki K., Zlatescu M. C., Lisle D. K., Finkelstein D. M., Hammond R. R., Silver J. S., Stark P. C., Macdonald D. R., Ino Y., Ramsay D. A., Louis D. N. Specific genetic predictors of chemotherapeutic response and survival in patients with anaplastic oligodendrogliomas. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 90: 1473-1479, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Druckrey H. Specific carcinogenic and teratogenic effects of "indirect" alkylating methyl and ethyl compounds, and their dependency on stages of ontogenic developments. Xenobiotica, 3: 271-303, 1973.
  13. Burger P. C., Shibata T., Aguzzi A., Kleihues P. Selective induction by N-nitrosoethylurea of oligodendrogliomas in fetal forebrain transplants. Cancer Res., 48: 2871-2875, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Walker M. D., Alexander E., Jr., Hunt W. E., MacCarty C. S., Mahaley M. S., Mealey J., Jr., Norrell H. A., Owens G., Ransohoff J., Wilson C. B., Gehan E. A., Strike T. A. Evaluation of BCNU and/or radiotherapy in the treatment of anaplastic gliomas. A cooperative clinical trial. J. Neurosurg., 49: 333-343, 1978.[Medline]
  15. Walker M. D., Green S. B., Byar D. P., Alexander E., Jr., Batzdorf U., Brooks W. H., Hunt W. E., MacCarty C. S., Mahaley M. S., Mealey J., Jr., Owens G., Ransohoff J., Robertson J. T., Shapiro W. R., Smith K. R., Wilson C. B., Strike T. A. Randomized comparisons of radiotherapy and nitrosoureas for the treatment of malignant glioma after surgery. N. Engl. J. Med., 303: 1323-1329, 1980.[Abstract]
  16. Chang C. H., Horton J., Schoenfeld D., Salazer O., Perez Tamayo R., Kramer S., Weinstein A., Nelson J. S., Tsukada Y. Comparison of postoperative radiotherapy and combined postoperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy in the multidisciplinary management of malignant gliomas. A joint Radiation Therapy Oncology Group and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. Cancer (Phila.), 52: 997-1007, 1983.[Medline]
  17. Yarosh D. B. The role of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in cell survival, mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res., 145: 1-16, 1985.[Medline]
  18. Lindahl T., Sedgwick B., Sekiguchi M., Nakabeppu Y. Regulation and expression of the adaptive response to alkylating agents. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 57: 133-157, 1988.[Medline]
  19. Pegg A. E. Properties of mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA transferases. Mutat. Res., 233: 165-175, 1990.[Medline]
  20. Pegg A. E. Mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase: regulation and importance in response to alkylating carcinogenic and therapeutic agents. Cancer Res., 50: 6119-6129, 1990.[Free Full Text]
  21. Swenberg J. A., Bedell M. A., Billings K. C., Umbenhauer D. R., Pegg A. E. Cell-specific differences in O6-alkylguanine DNA repair activity during continuous exposure to carcinogen. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79: 5499-5502, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ding R., Ghosh K., Eastman A., Bresnick E. DNA-mediated transfer and expression of a human DNA repair gene that demethylates O6-methylguanine. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5: 3293-3296, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Dolan M. E., Corsico C. D., Pegg A. E. Exposure of HeLa cells to O6-alkylguanines increases sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 132: 178-185, 1985.[Medline]
  24. Dolan M. E., Moschel R. C., Pegg A. E. Depletion of mammalian O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase activity by O6-benzylguanine provides a means to evaluate the role of this protein in protection against carcinogenic and therapeutic alkylating agents. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87: 5368-5372, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Kaina B., Fritz G., Mitra S., Coquerelle T. Transfection and expression of human O6-methylguanine-DNAmethyltransferase (MGMT) cDNA in Chinese hamster cells: the role of MGMT in protection against the genotoxic effects of alkylating agents. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 12: 1857-1867, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Russo A., Carmichael J., Friedman N., DeGraff W., Tochner Z., Glatstein E., Mitchell J. B. The roles of intracellular glutathione in antineoplastic chemotherapy. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 12: 1347-1354, 1986.[Medline]
  27. Beck, W. T., and Dalton, W. S. Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy. Section 11: mechanisms of drug resistance. In: V. T. DeVita, Jr., S. Hellman, and S. A. Rosenberg, (eds.), Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology. Ed. 5, pp. 498–512. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.
  28. Mannervik B., Awasthi Y. C., Board P. G., Hayes J. D., Di Ilio C., Ketterer B., Listowsky I., Morgenstern R., Muramatsu M., Pearson W. R., Pickett C. B., Sato K., Tu C-P. D., Widersten M., Wolf C. R. Nomenclature for human glutathione transferases. Biochem. J., 282: 305-310, 1992.
  29. Ali-Osman F., Caughlan J., Gray G. S. Decreased DNA interstrand cross-linking and cytotoxicity induced in human brain tumor cells by 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea after in vitro reaction with glutathione. Cancer Res., 49: 5954-5958, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Friedman H. S., Colvin O. M., Griffith O. W., Lippitz B., Elion G. B., Schold S. C., Jr., Hilton J., Bigner D. D. Increased melphalan activity in intracranial human medulloblastoma and glioma xenografts following buthionine sulfoximine-mediated glutathione depletion. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst., 81: 524-527, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Ali-Osman F., Stein D. E., Renwick A. Glutathione content and glutathione-S-transferase expression in 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea-resistant human malignant astrocytoma cell lines. Cancer Res., 50: 6976-6980, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Green J. A., Vistica D. T., Young R. C., Hamilton T. C., Rogan A. M., Ozols R. F. Potentiation of melphalan cytotoxicity in human ovarian cancer cell lines by glutathione depletion. Cancer Res., 44: 5427-5431, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Somfai-Relle S., Suzukake K., Vistica B. P., Vistica D. T. Reduction in cellular glutathione by buthionine sulfoximine and sensitization of murine tumor cells resistant to L-phenylalanine mustard. Biochem. Pharmacol., 33: 485-490, 1984.[Medline]
  34. Somfai-Relle S., Suzukake K., Vistica B. P., Vistica D. T. Glutathione-conferred resistance to antineoplastics: approaches toward its reduction. Cancer Treat. Rev., 11(Suppl.A): 43-54, 1984.
  35. Russo A., DeGraff W., Friedman N., Mitchell J. B. Selective modulation of glutathione levels in human normal versus tumor cells and subsequent differential response to chemotherapy drugs. Cancer Res., 46: 2845-2848, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Bartlett P. F., Noble M. D., Pruss R. M., Raff M. C., Rattray S., Williams C. A. Rat neural antigen-2 (RAN-2): a cell surface antigen on astrocytes, ependymal cells, Muller cells and lepto-meninges defined by a monoclonal antibody. Brain Res., 204: 339-351, 1981.[Medline]
  37. Eisenbarth G. S., Walsh F. S., Nirenberg M. Monoclonal antibody to a plasma membrane antigen of neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 4913-4917, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Ranscht B., Clapshaw P. A., Price J., Noble M., Seifert W. Development of oligodendrocytes and Schwann cells studied with a monoclonal antibody against galactocerebroside. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 79: 2709-2713, 1982.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. McCarthy K. D., De Vellis J. Preparation of separate astroglial and oligodendroglial cell cultures from rat cerebral tissue. J. Cell Biol., 85: 890-902, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Mayer M., Bhakoo K., Noble M. Ciliary neurotrophic factor and leukemia inhibitory factor promote the generation, maturation and survival of oligodendrocytes in vitro. Development (Camb.), 120: 143-153, 1994.[Abstract]
  41. Bottenstein J. E., Sato G. H. Growth of a rat neuroblastoma cell line in serum-free supplemented medium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 514-517, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Lillien L. E., Sendtner M., Rohrer H., Hughes S. M., Raff M. C. Type-2 astrocyte development in rat brain cultures is initiated by a CNTF-like protein produced by type-1 astrocytes. Neuron, 1: 485-494, 1988.[Medline]
  43. Johnson P., Gray D., Mowat M., Benchimol S. Expression of wild-type p53 is not compatible with continued growth of p53-negative tumor cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11: 1-11, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Ng, W. F., Sarangi, F., Zastawny, R. L., Veinot Drebot, L., and Ling, V. Identification of members of the P-glycoprotein multigene family. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9: 1224–1232, 1989.
  45. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning. A Laboratory Manual, Ed. 2. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989.
  46. Nutt C. L., Loktionova N. A., Pegg A. E., Chambers A. F., Cairncross J. G. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity, p53 gene status, and BCNU resistance in mouse astrocytes. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 2361-2365, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Griffith O. W., Meister A. Potent and specific inhibition of glutathione synthesis by buthionine sulfoximine (S-n-butyl homocysteine sulfoximine). J. Biol. Chem., 254: 7558-7560, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Ben-Yoseph O., Boxer P. A., Ross B. D. Assessment of the role of the glutathione and pentose phosphate pathways in the protection of primary cerebrocortical cultures from oxidative stress. J. Neurochem., 66: 2329-2337, 1996.[Medline]
  49. Cole S. P. C. Rapid chemosensitivity testing of human lung tumor cells using the MTT assay. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 17: 259-263, 1986.[Medline]
  50. Han K. A. , and Kulesz Martin, M. F. Alternatively spliced p53 RNA in transformed and normal cells of different tissue types. Nucleic Acids Res., 20: 1979-1981, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  51. Will K., Warnecke G., Bergmann S., Deppert W. Species- and tissue-specific expression of the C-terminal alternatively spliced form of the tumor suppressor p53. Nucleic Acids Res., 23: 4023-4028, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. Gant T. W., Silverman J. A., Thorgeirsson S. S. Regulation of P-glycoprotein gene expression in hepatocyte cultures and liver cell lines by a transacting transcriptional repressor. Nucleic Acids Res., 20: 2841-2846, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Nutt C. L., Costello J. F., Bambrick L. L., Yarosh D. B., Swinnen L. J., Chambers A. F., Cairncross J. G. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase in tumors and cells of the oligodendrocyte lineage. Can. J. Neurol. Sci., 22: 111-115, 1995.[Medline]
  54. Thorburne S. K., Juurlink B. H. J. Low glutathione and high iron govern the susceptibility of oligodendroglial precursors to oxidative stress. J. Neurochem., 67: 1014-1022, 1996.[Medline]
  55. Tenenbaum L., Teugels E., Dogusan Z., Avellana-Adalid V., Hooghe-Peters E. L. Plastic phenotype of human oligodendroglial tumour cells in vitro. Neuropathol. Appl. Neurobiol., 22: 302-310, 1996.[Medline]
  56. Levine J. M., Nishiyama A. The NG2 chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan: a multifunctional proteoglycan associated with immature cells. Perspect. Dev. Neurobiol., 3: 245-259, 1996.[Medline]
  57. Shoshan Y., Nishiyama A., Chang A., Mork S., Barnett G. H., Cowell J. K., Trapp B. D., Staugaitis S. M. Expression of oligodendrocyte progenitor cell antigens by gliomas: implications for the histogenesis of brain tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 10361-10366, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  58. Jaeckle K. A., Eyre H. J., Townsend J. J., Schulman S., Knudson H. M., Belanich M., Yarosh D. B., Bearman S. I., Giroux D. J., Schold S. C. Correlation of tumor O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase levels with survival of malignant astrocytoma patients treated with bis-chloroethylnitrosourea: a Southwest Oncology Group study. J. Clin. Oncol., 16: 3310-3315, 1998.[Abstract]
  59. Silber J. R., Bobola M. S., Ghatan S., Blank A., Kolstoe D. D., Berger M. S. O6-Methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase activity in adult gliomas: relation to patient and tumor characteristics. Cancer Res., 58: 1068-1073, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. P. Fruehauf, H. Brem, S. Brem, A. Sloan, G. Barger, W. Huang, and R. Parker
In vitro Drug Response and Molecular Markers Associated with Drug Resistance in Malignant Gliomas
Clin. Cancer Res., August 1, 2006; 12(15): 4523 - 4532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
L. Yuan, K. Choi, C. Khosla, X. Zheng, R. Higashikubo, M. R. Chicoine, and K. M. Rich
Tissue transglutaminase 2 inhibition promotes cell death and chemosensitivity in glioblastomas
Mol. Cancer Ther., September 1, 2005; 4(9): 1293 - 1302.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
N. D. Doolittle, L. E. Abrey, N. Ferrari, W. A. Hall, E. R. Laws, R. E. McLendon, L. L. Muldoon, D. Peereboom, D. R. Peterson, C. P. Reynolds, et al.
Targeted Delivery in Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors: Summary Report of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption Consortium
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 8(6): 1702 - 1709.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Geroni, S. Marchini, P. Cozzi, E. Galliera, E. Ragg, T. Colombo, R. Battaglia, M. Howard, M. D'Incalci, and M. Broggini
Brostallicin, a Novel Anticancer Agent Whose Activity Is Enhanced upon Binding to Glutathione
Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 62(8): 2332 - 2336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cairncross, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nutt, C. L.
Right arrow Articles by Cairncross, J. G.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online