Cancer Research Versailles No Abst  Advances in Breast Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dragani, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagao, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dragani, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagao, M.
[Cancer Research 60, 5017-5020, September 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Population-based Mapping of Pulmonary Adenoma Susceptibility 1 Locus1

Tommaso A. Dragani2, Setsuo Hirohashi, Takeo Juji, Kaname Kawajiri, Masahiro Kihara3, Masako Ono-Kihara3, Giacomo Manenti, Tomoko Nomoto, Haruhiko Sugimura, Keiichiro Genka, Jun Yokota, Takashi Takahashi, Tetsuya Mitsudomi and Minako Nagao

National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan [T. A. D., S. H., T. N., J. Y., M. N.]; Istituto Nazionale Tumori, 20133 Milan, Italy [T. A. D., G. M.]; Japanese Red Cross Central Blood Center, Tokyo, Japan [T. J.]; Saitama Cancer Center Research Institute, Saitama, Japan [K. K.]; Kanagawa Cancer Center Research Institute, Yokohama, Japan [M. K., M. O-K.]; Hamamatsu University of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan [H. S.]; National Okinawa Hospital, Okinawa, Japan [K. G.]; and Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan [T. T., T. M.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Pulmonary adenoma susceptibility 1 (Pas1), the major locus affecting inherited predisposition to lung tumor development in mice, maps near the Kras2 gene. We previously reported a significant association between a KRAS2/RsaI polymorphism and the risk and prognosis of lung adenocarcinoma (ADCA) in the Italian population. In the present case-control study, we examined 269 lung ADCA patients, 121 squamous cell lung carcinoma patients, and 632 healthy individuals (general population controls) in the Japanese population with genetic markers spanning ~1200 kb in the KRAS2 region. Allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization revealed the same KRAS2/RsaI polymorphism associated with risk and prognosis as in Italian lung ADCA patients; the polymorphism was significantly associated with clinical stage (P < 0.001) and survival rate (log rank = 0.0014), confirming the mapping of PAS1 and pointing to the role of this locus in human lung cancer.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Inbred mouse strains are available that show either high, intermediate, or low genetic susceptibility to lung cancer (1) . Pulmonary adenoma susceptibility 1 (Pas1) plays a major role in inherited predisposition to lung tumor development in mice, as shown by genetic linkage studies carried out in different crosses and in different laboratories (reviewed in Ref. 2 ). Our recent genetic linkage and LD4 studies suggest that the same Pas1 susceptibility allele is carried by most mouse strains with high and intermediate genetic susceptibility to cancer, leading us to hypothesize an ancestral origin of this allele (3) . We have fine-mapped the mouse Pas1 locus on a <2-Mb region of chromosome 6 using a combination of physical mapping and LD analysis (3) .

In an Italian population study, we demonstrated a significant association between genetic polymorphisms located in the human 12p12 chromosomal region, i.e., the region homologous to the Pas1 site in the mouse, and risk and prognosis of lung ADCA. However, population-based studies may be biased because of population admixture and stratification (4) . Thus, we have designed a case-control study in the Japanese population to determine whether a similar association exists between genetic markers and risk and prognosis of lung cancer. In lung ADCA patients, we found a significant association between clinical stage, prognosis, and the same marker polymorphism (KRAS2/RsaI) associated with lung cancer risk and prognosis in the Italian population. Pairwise LD between the biallelic markers used showed that LD can extend up to 200–300 kb.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Subjects.
A total of 269 pathologically documented lung ADCA and 121 SCC patients were enrolled at several Japanese institutions. Clinical data included stage and survival time. A random sample of 632 unrelated control subjects was established for estimating population gene frequency. Controls were included in part using a case-control design and in part as a random sampling of the general population. They were sampled from the same areas and were of the same ethnic origin (Japanese) as cases. Genomic DNAs were isolated according to standard methodologies. Smoking information was obtained from clinical records; the ex-smoker category included subjects who stopped smoking more than 1 year before diagnosis/sampling.

Genetic Markers.
A pilot study to identify genetic polymorphisms was conducted on selected Japanese cases and controls, using PCR primers allowing amplification of 1–2-kb DNA fragments containing the genetic markers of interest. Nucleotide sequences of the amplified fragments were obtained using an ABI PRISM 377 automatic sequencer (Perkin-Elmer). Nucleotide sequences were aligned and compared using the Genetics Computer Group software package to identify putative polymorphisms. PCR primers were designed to amplify DNA fragments of 100–200 bp (Table 1)Citation , and the SNPs identified were tested by ASO hybridization in the entire sample set, using the oligonucleotide probes reported in Table 1Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Oligonucleotides used as PCR primers and as probes for allele-specific hybridization

 
Genetic markers were amplified by PCR under the following conditions: 100–200 ng of genomic DNA; 1.5 mM MgCl2; 200 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphates; 0.25 unit of Taq polymerase (Perkin-Elmer/Roche); and 20 pmol of specific primers in a final volume of 20 µl. Thirty PCR cycles were performed. Aliquots of the PCR products were analyzed on an agarose gel and stained with ethidium bromide to check the quality of the PCR reactions. Physical mapping of genetic markers was performed using the Genebridge4 RH panel (Research Genetics; Ref. 5 ).

ASO Hybridization.
SNPs were detected by ASO hybridization. The PCR mix was denatured in 0.4 M NaOH/25 mM EDTA at room temperature and spotted onto a nylon membrane. Fifteen-mer ASOs, including the SNP at the central position, were 5'-end-labeled with [{gamma}-32P]dATP (3000 Ci/mM; Amersham, Branchburg, NY) and T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA). ASO hybridizations were performed in tetramethylammonium chloride as described previously (6) .

Statistical Analysis.
Molecular genetic analysis was performed without knowledge of the clinical data, which were available after completion of the marker analysis. Fisher’s exact test was used to evaluate LD in the case of two alleles at both loci because it detects significance with a low probability of false positives, and P < 0.001 was considered significant (7 , 8) . Negative logarithms of the statistical P values were used to present the pairwise LD evidence more clearly. Allele and genotype associations with lung cancer risk were also tested by the Fisher’s exact test. The Kaplan-Meier product-limit method (9) was adopted to estimate survival functions. The null hypothesis concerning the differential effects of genotypes on univariate (unadjusted) analysis or after adjustment for gender and smoking habits (adjusted analysis) was tested by means of the log-rank test (10) , and all P values were related to a two-sided significance test. In addition, Cox’s multiple regression analysis (11) was performed. The regression coefficients have been estimated by maximum likelihood criteria, and their significance was tested by Wald’s test (12) . The relative risks reported in the text were estimated as hazard rate ratios.


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Epidemiological data of the cases and controls are reported in Table 2Citation . Our cases constituted representative samples of Japanese lung ADCA and SCC patients collected consecutively in different institutions. Mean age was slightly lower in ADCA cases than in SCC cases (Table 2)Citation , and nonsmokers had ADCA more frequently than SCC, as expected. Smoking habits were available for more than 90% of cases and for ~60% of controls, which showed a distribution similar to that of ADCA cases (Table 2)Citation . Males were more frequent in SCC cases than in ADCA cases (Table 2)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Epidemiological data of lung cancer patients and general population controls

 
LD and Physical Distance between Genetic Markers.
The genetic markers used span from the KRAS2 to ITPR2 genes (Table 1)Citation . A physical map of the genetic markers was assembled based on reported data (13 , 14) , on our YAC contig data, and on RH mapping (data not shown). In this RH panel, a distance of 234 kb is attributed to 1 cR for chromosome 12 (5) . Although the algorithm used in RH mapping may lead to estimated physical distances <1 cR, computer simulation indicated that the RH panel provides a mapping resolution of 1.3–2.1 cR (304–490 kb) in the 12p12 region. The mapping resolution represents a range of minimal estimated distances between two non-cosegregating markers, due to single variations in typing. Considering these uncertainties in the physical distances, the following marker order with distances in cR was obtained: KRAS2-(4.2 cR)-KRAG-(0.8 cR)-M4-(0.0 cR)-ITPR2. The marker order and estimated distances were in agreement with the YAC contig map (data not shown). The physical distance between the KRAS2 and ITPR2 markers was found to be 5.0 cR (~1200 kb; Table 3Citation ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Pairwise LD between genetic markers mapping in the human PAS1 homologous region (chromosome 12p12)a

 
Pairwise LD analysis between genetic markers revealed statistically significant LD (-log P > 3) between close markers. The highest LD (-log P = 137) was seen for the two KRAS2 polymorphisms, which were separated by ~20 kb. As expected, intragenic polymorphisms maintained a high degree of disequilibrium (15) . The two M4 polymorphisms, located within a 1.3-kb DNA fragment that coamplifies with KRAS2 in some tumors (16) , also showed a highly significant LD (-log P = 43). Pairwise LD results were in agreement with the marker order predicted by the physical map and showed that in our population sample, a statistically significant LD can be detected up to 1 cR (200–300 kb), as in the case of KRAG-M4 markers (-log P = 14.7; Table 3Citation ).

Case-Control and Clinical Associations.
Allele frequencies at all loci were in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium for both patients and controls (data not shown). Analysis of association of genetic markers with risk of lung cancer showed no statistically significant association at any markers, even after adjustment for gender and smoking history. However, genotype A2/A2 at marker KRAS2/RsaI, i.e., homozygous for the presence of the restriction site, was ~2-fold more frequent in ADCA patients than in controls (Table 4)Citation . In SCC, only three individuals carried the A2/A2 genotype, and no significant difference from controls was observed.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 4 Genotype frequency of a KRAS2/RsaI polymorphism in Japanese lung ADCA patients by clinical stage and in the general population

 
Clinical stage according to KRAS2/RsaI genotype showed a significant difference in the distribution of the stages among the genotypes (P < 0.001). An excess of stage 3 and stage 4 patients was observed in the A2/A2 and A1/A2 genotypes, respectively, as compared with A1/A1 genotypes (Table 4)Citation .

The median follow-up time for all survivors was 1490 days (range, 190-7027 days). All markers were tested for possible allelic association with survival rate in ADCA patients and SCC patients separately. In ADCA patients, a statistically significant association was found only for marker KRAS2/RsaI; the A2 allele, which was present at an excess frequency in ADCA cases as compared with the general population controls, was associated with poorer survival (P = 0.0014; Fig. 1Citation ). The probabilities of survival at 1200 days were 0.58 ± 0.05 (n = 119), 0.30 ± 0.07 (n = 47), and 0.20 ± 0.18 (n = 5) for those with the A1/A1, A1/A2, and A2/A2 genotypes, respectively (P = 0.0030), indicating a significant trend toward poor survival by copy number of the A2 allele. Cox’s regression analysis, including genotypes, sex, and smoking habits, was carried out by resorting to a backward procedure. Genotypes (relative risk, 1.8; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–2.85; P = 0.01) and sex (relative risk, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–3.79; P = 0.006) remained statistically significant, whereas smoking habits failed to reach statistical significance.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Kaplan-Meier survival curves in lung ADCA patients carrying either the A1/A1 genotype (n = 119) or the A2 allele [A1/A2 (n = 47), A2/A2 (n = 5)] of the KRAS2/RsaI polymorphism.

 
No significant association was found between KRAS2/RsaI genotypes or any other marker genotypes and survival in SCC patients.


    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
In our previous analysis of the KRAS2/RsaI marker and risk/prognosis of lung cancer in the Italian population, individuals homozygous for the KRAS2/RsaI A2 allele were ~2-fold more frequent in the general population controls than in lung ADCA patients, with a difference that was of borderline statistical significance (13) . The same A2 allele associated with a protective effect on lung cancer risk was significantly associated with better survival (13) . In the Japanese population, there was a ~2-fold excess frequency of the homozygous A2 genotype in lung ADCA patients as compared with controls ("risk allele"), although this was not statistically significant, due at least in part to the lower frequency of the KRAS2/RsaI A2 allele in the Japanese general population as compared with the Italian population.

The A2 allele was seen more frequently in the general population than in cancer patients in the Italian population, but the opposite distribution was seen in the Japanese population; the reason for this difference may rest in the different creation of the LD between the KRAS2/RsaI marker and the PAS1 locus in the two populations. The A2 allele, in excess frequency in lung ADCA patients, was significantly associated with poor prognosis in the Japanese cases. Therefore, the same KRAS2/RsaI A2 allele showed a significant and consistent pattern of association with disease prognosis in lung ADCA patients from two unrelated populations. The maintenance of LD between a disease allele (PAS1) and the same marker allele (KRAS2/RsaI) in two unrelated populations provides strong support for the implication of the PAS1 gene in human lung tumorigenesis and suggests a close relationship between the loci of the disease and the marker.

In a study of LD in human populations, Laan and Paabo (17) showed that recently expanded populations, such as the Finns, are well suited to map rare single-disease genes affected by recent mutations, whereas populations that have been of constant size may be much better suited to map genes involved in complex traits caused by older mutations. Slatkin (8) reached the same conclusions, finding that there is a substantial probability of obtaining significant nonrandom associations between closely linked polymorphic loci in a population of constant size at equilibrium, whereas in a rapidly growing population, the probability of detecting significant LD is low, even between completely linked loci. Our results indicate that both the Italian and Japanese populations are well suited for mapping lung cancer predisposition loci, in agreement with the findings of other studies (18) .

Several studies have demonstrated a good correlation between physical distance and LD (15 , 19 , 20) . However, the correlation is necessarily imperfect due to the type, age, frequency, mutation rate, and so forth of the polymorphisms. In a survey of LD between microsatellite loci spread over an anonymous genome region in the Finnish population, LD was detected between loci separated by up to 1 Mb (19) . However, the detection limit for LD is ~50–300 kb when only biallelic markers are used (15 , 20) . In our total sample set of 1022 Japanese individuals, the biallelic markers showed a statistically significant LD with their flanking markers located in close vicinity, i.e., significant LD was detected up to a physical distance of 200–300 kb (Table 3)Citation . Thus, in light of the significant association between KRAS2 polymorphism and lung tumor prognosis, the PAS1 gene is most probably located within 200–300 kb of this polymorphism.

No LD is detectable between genetic markers and a disease locus resulting from multiple mutations, such as the NF1 locus (15) . Our positive results with respect to the association between KRAS2 polymorphisms and risk/prognosis of human lung cancer suggest that the PAS1 susceptibility allele in humans results from a single or a predominant mutation/polymorphism. This prediction is consistent with an ancestral origin of the PAS1 susceptibility allele, which has been hypothesized based on LD analysis of mouse inbred strains (3) .

The putative PAS1 locus showed a more statistically significant LD with prognosis than with risk of lung ADCA in both the Italian and Japanese populations. Prognosis of lung cancer patients may be affected by several factors, including gender and smoking habits (21) . In our ADCA patients, PAS1 and gender, but not smoking habits, were significantly associated with survival. Based on these data, it is possible that the low statistical level of LD with lung cancer risk is due to a relatively high frequency of the susceptibility allele in the general population. The PAS1 susceptibility allele may determine the risk of lung cancer in association with environmental risk factors (e.g., smoking). Indeed, Sellers et al. (22) suggested the involvement of a major predisposition gene in the risk of human lung cancer, i.e., the susceptibility allele of the predisposition gene causing lung cancer by interaction with tobacco smoking. Also, interaction of the PAS1 susceptibility allele with lung cancer resistance (Par) loci may mask the relevance of the PAS1 locus in association studies, underestimating the role of PAS1 in lung cancer risk (23) . In any case, the putative human PAS1 locus showed a consistent association with lung ADCA prognosis, indicating a role for the PAS1 gene in lung tumor progression.

The use of several genetic markers over a short region in our population-based association study allowed us to estimate the physical distance between biallelic markers to which LD extends in the Japanese population and to confirm of the role and fine mapping of PAS1 in humans. The delineation of a short mapping region (200–300 kb) for the PAS1 locus by LD provides the basis for the positional cloning of the PAS1 gene. Availability of the cloned gene will enable analysis of the type of mutation/polymorphism associated with the risk and prognosis of lung ADCA and study of the frequency of the disease allele(s) in different populations. Identification of individuals at genetic risk for lung ADCA as well as epidemiological studies to characterize the interaction of genetic and environmental factors will also be facilitated.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank P. Valagussa for statistical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control from the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan, a grant from the Smoking Research Foundation of Japan, and grants from Associazione and Fondazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro (AIRC and FIRC) of Italy. T. A. D. was a recipient of Foreign Research Fellowship of the Foundation for Promotion of Cancer Research (Tokyo, Japan). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Via G. Venezian 1, 20133 Milan, Italy. Fax: 39-02-2390764; E-mail: dragani{at}istitutotumori.mi.it Back

3 Present address: Kyoto University School of Public Health, Kyoto, Japan. Back

4 The abbreviations used are: LD, linkage disequilibrium; ADCA, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell lung carcinoma; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; ASO, allele-specific oligonucleotide; RH, radiation hybrid; YAC, yeast artificial chromosome. Back

Received 1/ 3/00. Accepted 8/ 2/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Malkinson A. M. The genetic basis of susceptibility to lung tumors in mice. Toxicology, 54: 241-271, 1989.[Medline]
  2. Manenti G., De Gregorio L., Gariboldi M., Falvella F. S., Zanesi N., Pierotti M. A., Dragani T. A. Genetic mapping of cancer susceptibility/resistance loci in the mouse. Recent Results Cancer Res., 154: 292-297, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Manenti G., Stafford A., De Gregorio L., Gariboldi M., Falvella F. S., Avner P., Dragani T. A. Linkage disequilibrium and physical mapping of Pas1 in mice. Genome Res., 9: 639-646, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Elston R. C. Linkage and association. Genet. Epidemiol., 15: 565-576, 1998.[Medline]
  5. Gyapay G., Schmitt K., Fizames C., Jones H., Vega-Czarny N., Spillett D., Muselet D., Prud’Homme J. F., Dib C., Auffray C., Morissette J., Weissenbach J., Goodfellow P. N. A radiation hybrid map of the human genome. Hum. Mol. Genet., 5: 339-346, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Manenti G., Pilotti S., Re F. C., Della Porta G., Pierotti M. A. Selective activation of ras oncogenes in follicular and undifferentiated thyroid carcinomas. Eur. J. Cancer, 30A: 987-993, 1994.
  7. Slatkin M., Excoffier L. Testing for linkage disequilibrium in genotypic data using the Expectation-Maximization algorithm. Heredity, 76: 377-383, 1996.
  8. Slatkin M. Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. Genetics, 137: 331-336, 1994.[Abstract]
  9. Kaplan E. L., Meier P. Non-parametric estimation from incomplete observations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc., 3: 457-481, 1958.
  10. Peto R., Peto J. Asymptotically efficient rank invariant test procedures. J. R. Stat. Soc. A, 135: 185-206, 1972.
  11. Cox D. R. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 34: 187-220, 1972.
  12. Miller, R. C. Survival Analysis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1981.
  13. Manenti G., De Gregorio L., Pilotti S., Falvella F. S., Incarbone M., Ravagnani F., Pierotti M. A., Dragani T. A. Association of chromosome 12p genetic polymorphisms with lung adenocarcinoma risk and prognosis. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 18: 1917-1920, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Heighway J., Betticher D. C., Hoban P. R., Altermatt H. J., Cowen R. Coamplification in tumors of KRAS2, type 2 inositol 1,4,5 triphosphate receptor gene, and a novel human gene, KRAG. Genomics, 35: 207-214, 1996.[Medline]
  15. Jorde L. B., Watkins W. S., Viskochil D., O’Connell P., Ward K. Linkage disequilibrium in the neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) region: implications for gene mapping. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 53: 1038-1050, 1993.[Medline]
  16. Heighway J. Primers for detection of StuI and BstXI polymorphisms in a fragment co-amplified with c-Ki-ras 2 (KRAS2). Nucleic Acids Res., 19: 3162 1991.[Free Full Text]
  17. Laan M., Paabo S. Demographic history and linkage disequilibrium in human populations. Nat. Genet., 17: 435-438, 1997.[Medline]
  18. Kawashima K., Nomura S., Hirai H., Fukushi S., Karube T., Takeuchi K., Naruke T., Nishimura S. Correlation of L-myc RFLP with metastasis, prognosis and multiple cancer in lung-cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer, 50: 557-561, 1992.[Medline]
  19. Peterson A. C., Di Rienzo A., Lehesjoki A. E., de la Chapelle A., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. The distribution of linkage disequilibrium over anonymous genome regions. Hum. Mol. Genet., 4: 887-894, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Jorde L. B., Watkins W. S., Carlson M., Groden J., Albertsen H., Thliveris A., Leppert M. Linkage disequilibrium predicts physical distance in the adenomatous polyposis coli region. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 54: 884-898, 1994.[Medline]
  21. Tomizawa Y., Adachi J., Kohno T., Hamada K., Saito R., Noguchi M., Matsuno Y., Hirohashi S., Yamaguchi N., Yokota J. Prognostic significance of allelic imbalances on chromosome 9p in stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res., 5: 1139-1146, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Sellers T. A., Potter J. D., Bailey-Wilson J. E., Rich S. S., Rothschild H., Eltson R. C. Lung cancer detection and prevention: evidence for an interaction between smoking and genetic predisposition. Cancer Res., 52: 2694s-2697s, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Manenti G., Gariboldi M., Elango R., Fiorino A., De Gregorio L., Falvella F. S., Hunter K., Housman D., Pierotti M. A., Dragani T. A. Genetic mapping of a pulmonary adenoma resistance locus (Par1) in mouse. Nat. Genet., 12: 455-457, 1996.[Medline]
  24. Abrams E. S., Shtatland T., Lerman L. S. PCR assay for a polymorphic TaqI site in the human K-ras-2 gene on chromosome 12p (KRAS2). Nucleic Acids Res., 19: 4795 1991.[Free Full Text]
  25. Heighway J. PCR primers to convert c-Ki-ras to a four allele RsaI system (KRAS2). Nucleic Acids Res., 19: 6966 1991.[Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
T. Kohno, H. Kunitoh, K. Suzuki, S. Yamamoto, A. Kuchiba, Y. Matsuno, N. Yanagitani, and J. Yokota
Association of KRAS polymorphisms with risk for lung adenocarcinoma accompanied by atypical adenomatous hyperplasias
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2008; 29(5): 957 - 963.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Manenti, F. Galbiati, A. Pettinicchio, M. Spinola, S. Piconese, V. P. Leoni, B. Conti, F. Ravagnani, M. Incarbone, U. Pastorino, et al.
A V141L polymorphism of the human LRMP gene is associated with survival of lung cancer patients
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2006; 27(7): 1386 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
C. Solano-Lopez, P. C. Zeidler-Erdely, A. F. Hubbs, S. H. Reynolds, J. R. Roberts, M. D. Taylor, S.-H. Young, V. Castranova, and J. M. Antonini
Welding Fume Exposure and Associated Inflammatory and Hyperplastic Changes in the Lungs of Tumor Susceptible A/J Mice
Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2006; 34(4): 364 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
F. Lesueur, P. D. Pharoah, S. Laing, S. Ahmed, C. Jordan, P. L. Smith, R. Luben, N. J. Wareham, D. F. Easton, A. M. Dunning, et al.
Allelic association of the human homologue of the mouse modifier Ptprj with breast cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 15, 2005; 14(16): 2349 - 2356.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Manenti and T. A. Dragani
Pas1 haplotype-dependent genetic predisposition to lung tumorigenesis in rodents: a meta-analysis
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2005; 26(5): 875 - 882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol.Home page
A. K. Bauer, A. M. Malkinson, and S. R. Kleeberger
Susceptibility to neoplastic and non-neoplastic pulmonary diseases in mice: genetic similarities
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, October 1, 2004; 287(4): L685 - L703.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Wang, Z. Zhang, Y. Yan, W. J. Lemon, M. LaRegina, C. Morrison, R. Lubet, and M. You
A Chemically Induced Model for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Lung in Mice: Histopathology and Strain Susceptibility
Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 64(5): 1647 - 1654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M. Gariboldi, M. Spinola, S. Milani, C. Pignatiello, K. Kadota, H. Bono, Y. Hayashizaki, T. A. Dragani, and Y. Okazaki
Gene expression profile of normal lungs predicts genetic predisposition to lung cancer in mice
Carcinogenesis, November 1, 2003; 24(11): 1819 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Z. Zhang, M. Futamura, H. G. Vikis, M. Wang, J. Li, Y. Wang, K.-L. Guan, and M. You
Positional cloning of the major quantitative trait locus underlying lung tumor susceptibility in mice
PNAS, October 28, 2003; 100(22): 12642 - 12647.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. A. Dragani
10 Years of Mouse Cancer Modifier Loci: Human Relevance
Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3011 - 3018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Wang, W. J. Lemon, G. Liu, Y. Wang, F. A. Iraqi, A. M. Malkinson, and M. You
Fine Mapping and Identification of Candidate Pulmonary Adenoma Susceptibility 1 Genes Using Advanced Intercross Lines
Cancer Res., June 15, 2003; 63(12): 3317 - 3324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. Manenti, F. Galbiati, S. Noci, and T. A. Dragani
Outbred CD-1 mice carry the susceptibility allele at the pulmonary adenoma susceptibility 1 (Pas1) locus
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2003; 24(6): 1143 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Med. Genet.Home page
W J Lemon, C H Swinton, M Wang, N Berbari, Y Wang, and M You
Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis of mouse pulmonary adenoma susceptibility loci 1-4 for identification of candidate genes
J. Med. Genet., April 1, 2003; 40(4): e36 - 36.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
N. Yanagitani, T. Kohno, N. Sunaga, H. Kunitoh, T. Tamura, S. Tsuchiya, R. Saito, and J. Yokota
Localization of a human lung adenocarcinoma susceptibility locus, possibly syntenic to the mouse Pas1 locus, in the vicinity of the D12S1034 locus on chromosome 12p11.2-p12.1
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2002; 23(7): 1177 - 1183.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. M. Malkinson, R. A. Radcliffe, and A. K. Bauer
Quantitative trait locus mapping of susceptibilities to butylated hydroxytoluene-induced lung tumor promotion and pulmonary inflammation in CXB mice
Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2002; 23(3): 411 - 417.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dragani, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagao, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dragani, T. A.
Right arrow Articles by Nagao, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online