| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Tumor Biology |
3ß1 Integrin-mediated Adhesion and Neurite-like Outgrowth and Inhibits Proliferation of Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Cells
Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [N-h. G., H. A-B., J. C., J. M. S., H. C. K., D. D. R.], and Center for Cell and Gene Therapy, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030 [N. S. T.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3 or ß1 integrin subunits, and by soluble
3ß1 integrin ligands. SCLC cells extended neurite-like processes
on a TSP1 substrate, which was also mediated by
3ß1 integrin.
Process formation on a TSP1 substrate was specifically stimulated by
epidermal growth factor and somatostatin. Adhesion on TSP1 weakly
inhibited SCLC cell proliferation, but this inhibition was strongly
enhanced in the presence of epidermal growth factor. TSP1 and an
3ß1 integrin-binding peptide from TSP1 also inhibited
proliferation when added in solution. High-affinity binding of
125I-labeled TSP1 to OH-1 cells was heparin-dependent and
may be mediated by sulfated glycolipids, which are the major sulfated
glycoconjugates synthesized by these cells. Synthesis or secretion of
TSP1 by SCLC cells could not be detected. On the basis of these
results, the
3ß1 integrin and sulfated glycolipids cooperate to
mediate adhesion of SCLC cells on TSP1. Interaction with TSP1 through
this integrin inhibits growth and induces neurotypic differentiation,
which suggests that this response to TSP1 may be exploited to inhibit
the progression of SCLC. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many SCLC cell lines have been established that are typically
nonadherent on tissue culture substrates and grow as tight aggregates
in suspension (4
, 5)
. Cell-cell adhesion is, therefore,
the dominant interaction for SCLC cells and is mediated by E-cadherin
(6)
and neural cell adhesion molecules. Expression of the
latter by SCLC correlates with poor prognosis (1
, 7)
.
Although SCLC cell lines generally fail to interact with the adhesive
proteins in serum and with most extracellular matrix components, some
SCLC lines can attach on laminin substrates (8, 9, 10)
. SCLC
cells express some ß1 integrins but not ß3, ß4, or ß5 integrins
(11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
and were reported to interact with laminins
through
3ß1 and
6ß1 integrins (12
, 16)
.
To better understand the role of cell-matrix interactions in the rapid
dissemination of SCLC, we have examined the possible role of TSP1 to
mediate interactions of SCLC cells with the extracellular matrix. TSP1
is a major component of the
-granules of platelets and is a member
of the thrombospondin family of matricellular proteins that is
synthesized by many cell types in response to growth factor stimulation
(reviewed in Ref. 17
).
In common with other extracellular matrix proteins such as fibronectin and laminins, TSP1 plays important roles in regulating growth, motility, survival, and adhesion of cells (reviewed in Ref. 18 ) and modulating tumor growth and metastasis (reviewed in Ref. 19 ). TSP1 can directly influence adhesion, growth, and motility of some tumor cell lines in vitro (reviewed in Ref. 19 ), but its major inhibitory effect on tumor growth in vivo is thought to result from the inhibition of angiogenesis (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) .
TSP1 is recognized by several cell surface receptors including ß3 and ß1 integrins, CD47, syndecan-1, sulfatides, and CD36 (reviewed in Ref. 19 ). TSP1 also binds to several extracellular matrix components (26) , which may in turn mediate its binding to cells through additional receptors. Distinct signaling pathways may be induced by the binding of TSP1 to each class of receptor (27, 28, 29, 30) ; therefore, identification of the specific TSP1 receptors used by each cell type is important for understanding the responses that result from these interactions.
We recently observed that OH-1 cells and other nonadherent SCLC cell
lines attached avidly to TSP1 substrates and grew as adherent cells on
this substrate. We have characterized the receptors that mediate this
response and demonstrate here that both sulfated glycolipids and
3ß1 integrin on SCLC cells function as TSP1 receptors. The
activity of this integrin is stimulated by EGF and somatostatin. In
addition to mediating adhesion, the
3ß1 integrin promotes
neurite-like outgrowth on TSP1 substrates and modulates SCLC cell
growth.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The function-blocking CD36 antibody OKM-5 was purchased from Ortho-mune
(Raritan, NJ). The integrin
vß3 antibody LM609 was the gift of Dr.
David Cheresh (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA; Ref.
35
). Rat monoclonal antibodies to the human ß1 integrin
(mAb 13) and
5 subunits (mAb 16) were provided
by Dr. Kenneth Yamada (National Institute for Dental and Craniofacial
Research, Bethesda, MD; Ref. 36
). Integrin
function-blocking antibodies P1B5 (
3ß1), P4C2 (
4ß1), and P1D6
(
5ß1) were obtained from Life Technologies, Inc. The ß1
integrin-activating antibody TS2/16 (37)
and the CD98
antibody 4F2 were prepared from hybridomas obtained from the American
Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD).
The following oligonucleotides were synthesized (The Midland Certified Reagent Co., Midland, TX) and used as primers for the RT-PCR: upstream primer for human THBS1: 5'-CAA CCA CAA TGG AGA GCA CCG-3'; downstream primer sequence for THBS1: 5'-TAG TTG CAC TTG GCG TTC TTG TTG-3'; upstream primer for human THBS2: 5'-CTC CAC CAG CAA GGT GCC TCG CTG-3'; downstream primer for THBS2: 5'-CCG TCG CCC GCG TAG CCT GTC TGG-3'; upstream primer sequence for human THBS3: 5'-GAC ACA GTG CCT GAG GAC TTT GAG-3'; downstream primer for THBS3: 5'-TGG CAA TGT GCT GTC ATC TTT CC-3'; upstream primer for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: 5'-GCT CTC CAG AAC ATC ATC CCT GCC-3'; downstream primer sequence of human glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase: 5'-TCC TTG GAG GCC ATG TGG GCC ATG-3'.
Cell Culture.
The OH-1 cell line (38)
was provided by Dr. Joel Shaper
(Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD). Variant OH-1 arose after
prolonged culture of OH-1 and had lost the tight aggregate
morphology. The H128, H69, H82, and H209 cell lines were purchased from
the American Type Culture Collection. These cell lines were established
from pleural fluids of SCLC patients (5)
. N417 and H345
cell lines (39)
were provided by Dr. A. Gazdar (University
of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX). N417
originated from a lung metastasis and H345 from a bone marrow
metastasis. All of the cell lines were cultured suspended in RPMI 1640
with 15% FCS (Biofluids Inc., Rockville, MD) at 37°C in a 5%
CO2 incubator. The medium was changed every 5
days.
Cells were passaged every 9- 11 days. In brief, cells were centrifuged at 400 x g for 2 min, and the medium was aspirated. Cell pellets were washed once with RPMI 1640 containing 5 mM MgCl2 and treated for 5 min with 50 µg/ml DNase-1 (Biofluids Inc.) in RPMI 1640 containing 5 mM magnesium chloride. The cells were triturated three times, and 0.1 volume of trypsin (2.5%; Life Technologies, Inc.) was added for 5 min and triturated as above. The single cell suspension was washed once with the same medium, centrifuged, and suspended in fresh medium.
For adhesion assays, cell aggregates were washed once with RPMI 1640 and centrifuged at 200 x g for 2 min. The pellet was suspended in PBS (pH 7.4), containing 2.5 mM EDTA and incubated for 10 min at 37°C. After trituration three times and centrifugation for 2 min at 400 x g, the cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 containing 0.1% BSA (Sigma). Trypan blue staining showed greater than 90% cell viability.
Adhesion of SCLC Cells to Extracellular Matrix Proteins.
Extracellular matrix proteins or peptides in Dulbeccos PBS were
adsorbed onto polystyrene by incubating overnight at 4°C. Adsorption
isotherms of TSP1 on plastic have been reported previously
(40)
. The supernatant fluid was removed, and the dishes
were incubated with Dulbeccos PBS with 1% BSA for 30 min to minimize
nonspecific adhesion. The dishes were washed twice with cold PBS (pH
7.2) and overlaid with dissociated SCLC cells, prepared as described
above, at a density of 5 x 104/cm2. For inhibition,
inhibitors or antibodies were added and incubated with SCLC cells at
the indicated concentrations. After incubation for 6090 min at
37°C, the dishes were washed three times with PBS (pH 7.2), fixed
with 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS (pH 7.2), and stained with Diff-Quik.
Attached cells were counted microscopically.
Neurite outgrowth was assessed in SCLC cells after incubation for 7590 min on a TSP1 substrate. Neurites extending more than one-cell-diameter from the central cell body were counted microscopically in four adjacent 0.25-mm2 fields for each triplicate analysis.
Immunoprecipitation and Western Analysis.
OH-1 cells were surface-labeled using EZ-Link Sulfo-NHS-LC-Biotin
(Pierce) as suggested by the manufacturer. The cells were then lysed in
50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP40,
0.5% sodium deoxycholate, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM NaF
supplemented with 10 µg/ml each of the following protease inhibitors:
antipain, pepstatin A, chymostatin, leupeptin, aprotinin, soybean
trypsin inhibitor, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl
fluoride. A total of 90 µg of proteins were immunoprecipitated
using 0.75 µg mouse monoclonal anti-EGF receptor antibody
(Transduction Laboratories) prebound to antimouse IgG agarose (Sigma).
After washing, the immune complex was eluted with sample buffer.
Immunoprecipitated proteins were fractionated on a 10% SDS gel along
with 5 µg of A431 carcinoma total proteins as a control. The proteins
were transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membrane and
blotted with mouse anti-EGF receptor antibody. The membrane was washed
and incubated with a mixture of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated goat
antimouse IgG antibody (Kirkegaard and Perry, Gaithersburg, MD)
and horseradish peroxidase-streptavidin (Pierce) and was visualized
using chemiluminescent substrate (Pierce).
Proliferation.
Effects of soluble and substrate-bound TSP1 or TSP1 peptides on cell
proliferation were quantified using a tetrazolium proliferation assay
(CellTiter Assay, Promega). Treatment with soluble TSP1 was performed
in 96-well tissue culture plates, and proliferation was determined
after 72 h in RPMI containing 15% FCS. Proteins and peptides were
immobilized on Nunc Maxisorp 96-well plates by overnight incubation
with the proteins or peptides dissolved in 50 µl of sterile
Dulbeccos PBS. The supernatant fluid was removed, and the wells were
incubated for 30 min. in Dulbeccos PBS containing 1% BSA. OH-1 cells
(1 x 104/well) were added in RPMI
containing 15% FCS and incubated for 72 h at 37° in 5%
CO2. For assessing inhibition by soluble proteins
or peptides, OH-1 cells were grown in suspension in Nunclon 96-well
tissue culture plates using the same medium supplemented with the
indicated inhibitors and growth factors.
Cell-binding Assay.
A 0.2-ml cell suspension, dissociated using EDTA as above, was
transferred into 12 x 75-mm polypropylene tubes (PGC
Scientific Inc., Gaithersburg, MD). Iodinated proteins (final
concentration of 0.2 µg/ml) were added and incubated for 1 h on
ice with rotary shaking. Bound radioactivity was quantified after
centrifugation of the cells through oil as described previously
(32)
. For inhibition studies, inhibitors were added first
and incubated with the cells for 15 min. Iodinated proteins, peptides,
or fragments were then added and incubated as above. To test the effect
of divalent cations on binding of TSP1 to OH-1 cells, the cells were
treated and suspended in HBSS or HBSS containing EDTA or
divalent cations. After incubation for 1 h at 4°C, cells were
centrifuged and separated from the unbound ligand by centrifugation
through oil and counted in a gamma counter. Using the same procedure,
other media (including DMEM, RPMI 1640, or RPMI 1640 without phosphate) were
tested but had no effect on the binding of TSP1 to the cells.
Extraction of Sulfatide and Interaction with TSP1.
Sulfatides were extracted from SCLC cells, desalted by Sephadex G-25,
and separated into neutral and acidic fractions by DEAE-Sepharose
ion-exchange chromatography according to the previously described
method (41)
. Fractions were evaporated to dryness and
dissolved in chloroform-methanol (1:1) for analysis. The extracts were
chromatographed on aluminum-backed high-performance TLC plates and
incubated with 125I-labeled TSP1 according to the
previously described method (41)
.
RT/PCR.
Total RNAs from SCLC cell lines were extracted using RNAzol B according
to the suppliers protocol. RNA pellets were washed with 75% ethanol,
briefly dried under vacuum for 2 min, and stored in -70°C. RT-PCR
was performed according to the manufacturers procedure (Perkin-Elmer
Cetus). Aliquots (2 µl) containing 250 ng of human SCLC total RNA
were brought to a final volume of 20 µl with reverse transcription
buffer containing rTth polymerase and downstream primer. The samples
were heated to 70° for 15 min. PCR buffer with the same amount of
sense primers was added to a final volume of 100 µl. The reaction
mixture was heated to 95° for 1 min and amplified for 3050 cycles:
at 95° for 10 s and at 60° for 15 s. Finally, the sample
was incubated at 60° for 5 min. The PCR products were analyzed by
agarose gel electrophoresis.
Metabolic Labeling of Sulfatides and Proteoglycans.
SCLC cells were cultured in 5 ml of RPMI 1640 without methionine
containing 4% Ultroser HY (IBF Biotechnics) for 12 h in
25-cm2 culture flask before the addition of 125
µCi of [35S]sulfate (ICN Radiochemicals).
After 48 h, the cells were harvested, and glycolipids or
proteoglycans were extracted according to the previously described
method (41)
. For some experiments, cells were grown in
sulfate-depleted medium supplemented with sodium chlorate to inhibit
sulfation as described previously (42)
.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
3ß1 Integrin.
vß3 integrin (LM609) and CD36 (OKM5), had no
effect on adhesion to TSP1 (results not shown). A function-blocking
antibody recognizing ß1 integrin was a dose-dependent inhibitor
of OH-1 cell adhesion on TSP1 but inhibited adhesion only by half at
saturating concentrations (Fig. 2A
|
subunit antibodies were used to define
the specific ß1 integrin that recognized TSP1 (Fig. 2B
3ß1 integrin function-blocking antibody (P1B5) but not
anti-
4 or anti-
5
integrin antibodies, which have been reported to recognize TSP1 in
other cell types (44
, 45)
, partially inhibited adhesion on
TSP1. The
3 and ß1 function-blocking antibodies also partially
inhibited adhesion of OH-1 cells on an immobilized TSP1 peptide
(peptide 678), which is recognized by the
3ß1 integrin on breast
carcinoma cells (33
, 45)
, and on immobilized
invasin (Fig. 2B
3ß1,
4ß1, and
5ß1 (43)
;
therefore. the failure of the
4ß1 and
5ß1 antibodies to
significantly inhibit adhesion to immobilized invasin combined with
their lack of adhesion on the well-characterized ligand for these
integrins, fibronectin (Fig. 1
4ß1 nor
5ß1 integrins. The consistently
greater inhibition by the integrin antagonists of adhesion on invasin
relative to that on TSP1 is also consistent with involvement of a
heparin-sensitive receptor in adhesion to TSP1.
The ß1 integrin-activating antibody TS2/16 enhanced adhesion on TSP1
and on the TSP1 peptide 678 but not on a CD36-binding peptide (Mal II)
or a heparin-binding peptide (p246) from TSP1 (Fig. 2C
).
This further confirmed that the recognition of TSP1 peptide 678 by OH-1
cells is ß1 integrin-mediated and suggested that this integrin exists
in a partially inactive state on OH-1 cells.
TSP1 Promotes Neurite-like Outgrowth of SCLC.
The attached OH-1 cells generally retained rounded cell bodies, but
many cells rapidly extended neurite-like processes on the TSP1
substrate (Fig. 3 A
).
3ß1 integrin binding was necessary for neurite
outgrowth on TSP1 because function-blocking
3 and ß1 integrin
antibodies inhibited the response (Fig. 3, B and D
). In contrast, function-blocking antibodies that
recognized
4ß1 or
5ß1 integrins did not inhibit neurite
outgrowth (Fig. 3D
). The
3ß1 integrin-binding peptide
678 from TSP1 (Fig. 3, C and D
) and the
3ß1
ligand invasin also inhibited neurite outgrowth on a TSP1 substrate
(Fig. 3D
). Ligation of
3ß1 integrin also was sufficient
to promote formation of neurite-like processes, in that substrates
coated with immobilized TSP1 peptide 678 or invasin both promoted
neurite formation (Fig. 3E
). The control peptide 690, in
which the essential Arg residue was replaced by Ala, was
inactive, and an analogue with decreased integrin binding, peptide 686
(33)
, was a weaker stimulator of neurite outgrowth. The
TSP1 heparin-binding peptide 246 only weakly promoted neurite
outgrowth, which indicated that the heparin-binding activity of TSP1 is
not sufficient to stimulate the neurite outgrowth response. Activation
of the
3ß1 integrin by antibody TS2/16 increased neurite formation
on TSP1 (Fig. 4A
).
|
|
3ß1 integrin binding
mediates neurite-like outgrowth on TSP1.
EGF and Somatostatin Stimulate Integrin-mediated Outgrowth of SCLC
on TSP1.
Although we previously demonstrated that insulin and insulin-like
growth factor-1 specifically stimulated the
3ß1 integrin-mediated
spreading of breast carcinoma cells on TSP1 (45)
, these
growth factors had no significant effect on the function of the same
integrin in SCLC cells to promote adhesion on TSP1 or neurite outgrowth
(Fig. 4A
and data not shown). Basic FGF also had no effect,
but EGF was a potent inducer of OH-1 neurite outgrowth on TSP1 and
moderately increased cell adhesion on TSP1 or peptide 678 (Fig. 4A
and data not shown). Expression of EGF receptor by OH-1
cells was verified by immunoprecipitation using an EGF receptor
antibody, which comigrated with the EGF receptor from A431 epidermoid
carcinoma cells (inset in Fig. 4A
).
EGF-stimulated outgrowth of neurite-like processes on a TSP1 substrate
required the
3ß1 integrin because both
3- and ß1-specific
function-blocking antibodies reversed the stimulation by EGF (Fig. 4B
). Blocking the heparin-binding sites of TSP1 using
soluble heparin, in contrast, had no effect on EGF-stimulated outgrowth
(Fig. 4B
). EGF also specifically induced neurite outgrowth
on the
3ß1 ligand invasin, confirming that the stimulation of
neurite outgrowth by EGF was ß1 integrin-dependent (Fig. 4C
).
Several neuropeptides have also been reported to promote neurite
outgrowth in other neurectoderm-derived cell lines (46
, 47)
. Representatives of two major neuropeptide families were
tested. Somatostatin-14, a member of the somatostatin family,
stimulated outgrowth on TSP1 (Fig. 4A
) and slightly
stimulated adhesion on TSP1 (results not shown). In contrast, bombesin,
a member of the bombesin/gastrin-releasing peptide family that are
secreted by many SCLC cell lines, was inactive (Fig. 4A
).
CD47-binding peptides from the carboxyl-terminal domain of TSP1
activate the function of several integrins in other cell types
(27
, 29 , 48)
but did not stimulate
3ß1 integrin
function in breast carcinoma cells (45)
. Consistent with
the latter results, the CD47-binding peptide 7N3 did not significantly
stimulate neurite outgrowth or adhesion of OH-1 cells on TSP1 (Fig. 4A
and results not shown). Therefore, TSP1 cannot stimulate
a neurite-like outgrowth response of SCLC cells to itself by binding to
CD47.
TSP1 and an
3ß1 Integrin-binding Peptide from TSP1 Inhibit
SCLC Proliferation.
TSP1 is known to modulate the growth of several cell types (reviewed in
Ref. 19
). The addition of soluble TSP1 to nonadherent OH-1
cells markedly inhibited their proliferation, with an
IC50 of 40 nM (Fig. 5A
). This inhibition may result from ligation of the
3ß1
integrin because two additional ligands for this integrin, MBP-invasin
(IC50 = 80 nM)
and the TSP1 peptide 678 (IC50 = 6
µM), also inhibited OH-1 cell proliferation
(Fig. 5A
). The activity of peptide 678 was specific in that
the analogue 686, in which the essential Asn residue was replaced
by Ala (33)
, was inactive. A heparin-binding
peptide from the type 1 repeats (peptide 246) only weakly inhibited
OH-1 cell proliferation at the same concentrations (data not shown),
further indicating that the inhibition by the integrin-binding peptide
from TSP1 is specific.
|
Surprisingly, OH-1 cell proliferation was much more sensitive to
inhibition by immobilized TSP1 in the presence of EGF (Fig. 5B
). The addition of EGF alone had no significant effect on
the proliferation of OH-1 cells, but, in the presence of immobilized
TSP1, it produced a dose-dependent inhibition of proliferation (Fig. 5C
). The inhibition of proliferation on a TSP1 substrate by
EGF was specific in that IGF1 and bombesin did not display synergism
with TSP1 to inhibit proliferation (data not shown). The inhibition of
proliferation by a TSP1 substrate in the presence of EGF may also be
mediated by the
3ß1 integrin because substrates coated with TSP1
peptide 678 or MBP-invasin showed similar cooperative effects with EGF
to inhibit OH-1 cell proliferation (Fig. 5D
). TSP1 peptides
that bind to CD47 (7N3) or heparin (p246) did not synergize with EGF,
which indicated that the activity of TSP1 peptide 678 is specific (Fig. 5D
). Thus, EGF specifically and synergistically suppressed
proliferation of SCLC cells attached on TSP1 or an
3ß1-binding
sequence from TSP1.
Sulfatides Mediate High-affinity Binding of Soluble TSP1 to SCLC
Cells.
Although integrins mediate these biological responses of OH-1 cells to
TSP1, heparin-inhibitable binding accounted for most of the
high-affinity binding of soluble TSP1 to OH-1 cells. TSP1 bound
saturably to OH-1 cells with a dissociation constant of 72 ± 16 nM and 2.6 x 105 sites/cell (Fig. 6A
). This is comparable to the binding constant of 50
nM for TSP1 reported for TSP1 binding to resting
platelets (49)
and of 22 nM for
keratinocytes (50)
. The dissociation constant for H128
cells was slightly higher than for OH-1 cells
(Kd = 92 ± 21 nM) with 2.1 x 105 binding sites/cell (data not shown).
Additional low-affinity sites may be present on both cell lines but
were not detected using the accessible TSP1 concentrations.
|
3ß1 integrin.
OH-1 cells incorporated
35SO4 into acidic
glycolipids, glycoproteins, and proteoglycans. In contrast to the
predominant labeling of proteoglycans in most cell types examined
previously (Ref. 41
and unpublished
results),3
the majority (89%) of [35S]-incorporation was
recovered in the lipid fraction extracted using chloroform/methanol. No
binding of 125I-labeled TSP1 was detected to the
glycoprotein or proteoglycan fractions (results not shown); therefore,
these fractions were not further characterized. The sulfated
glycolipids identified by [35S]-labeling in
extracts of OH-1 cells are shown in Fig. 7
, Lane a. Galactosyl sulfatide was the major
sulfated lipid based on comigration of the labeled glycolipid with
authentic bovine brain sulfatide in two developing solvents. When the
total acidic glycolipids separated on TLC were incubated with
125I-labeled TSP1 (Lane b), a major
band comigrating with authentic galactosyl sulfatide from bovine brain
(Lane c) was strongly labeled. Several more
complex glycolipids also incorporated
[35S]sulfate (Lane a) but
were not present in sufficient concentration to detect TSP1 binding
(Lane b).
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3ß1 integrin and sulfated
glycolipids. Interaction of the
3ß1 integrin on SCLC cells with
immobilized TSP1 stimulates formation of neurite-like processes and
inhibits SCLC cell growth. Both the induction of neurite-like processes
and the inhibition of proliferation by TSP1 are enhanced in the
presence of EGF, which suggests that TSP1 and EGF cooperate to reduce
SCLC growth by inducing neurotypic differentiation.
These results demonstrate that the
3ß1 integrin is an important
receptor in SCLC cells for transducing signals from TSP1. On the basis
of the activity of a TSP1 peptide, these signals are initiated by the
binding of residues 190201 in the NH2-terminal
pentraxin module of TSP1 to this integrin. The
3ß1 integrin also
plays a major role in the adhesion of breast carcinoma and endothelial
cells to TSP1
(45)
,4
promotes neurite outgrowth in rat neurons on TSP1 (52)
,
and was recently shown to mediate interactions of neuroblastoma cells
with TSP1 (53)
. Although the
4ß1 and
5ß1
integrins are TSP1 receptors on other cell types (44
, 45
, 53)
, these integrins do not play a significant role in SCLC cell
adhesion on TSP1. The high-affinity binding of TSP1 to SCLC cells,
however, is not mediated by this integrin. This observation is
consistent with previous reports that the affinity of TSP1 binding to
3ß1 integrin is relatively low (34)
and that
high-affinity binding of TSP1 to both breast carcinoma cells and SCLC
cells is mediated by sulfated glycoconjugates rather than the
3ß1
integrin (45)
.
Sulfated glycolipids on cell membranes play a role in the interactions of several cell types with TSP1 (54) . In melanoma (41) , carcinoma, and endothelial cells,5 sulfated glycolipids typically account for only 0.510% of the total 35SO4 incorporation at steady state, but these are the major sulfated glycoconjugate on OH-1 cells. These glycolipids mediate most high-affinity binding of soluble TSP1 to OH-1 cells and significantly contribute to their adhesion on immobilized TSP1 but do not mediate neurite outgrowth.
Formation of neurite-like processes has been observed previously
when SCLC cells were plated on substrates coated with laminin-1
(10)
, polyethyleneimine or the extracellular matrix
produced by PC-9 lung carcinoma cells (55)
. The present
results identify TSP1 as a matrix protein that also induces this
response in SCLC cells and is mediated by the
3ß1 integrin. This
is consistent with the observations that the
3ß1 integrin mediated
neurite outgrowth of rat sympathetic neurons on TSP1 (52)
and that central and peripheral neurons (56)
and
neuroblastoma cells (53)
formed neurites when plated on
TSP1. EGF-induced neurotypic differentiation of thymic epithelial cells
induced TSP1 expression, and TSP1 also induced neurite outgrowth in
these cells (57)
. Therefore, TSP1 may inhibit the growth
of SCLC cells by triggering signaling through the
3ß1 integrins
that induce the cells to differentiate along a neuronal pathway.
Enhancement of this differentiation signal by EGF may explain the
synergism of these two proteins to inhibit SCLC cell proliferation. EGF
is known to have both growth-stimulating and -inhibitory activities in
other cell types (58)
, but inhibition by EGF has not been
observed in SCLC.
As was observed in breast carcinoma and endothelial cells
(45)
,4
the activation state of
3ß1 integrin in
SCLC cells to recognize TSP1 is regulated. The signals that mediate
this regulation, however, seem to be different for each cell type. The
3ß1 integrin in SCLC cells is activated by EGF and somatostatin
but not by CD47 ligation or by FGF or IGF1 receptor ligands, whereas
IGF1 but not EGF activates that same integrin in breast carcinoma
cells. The specificity for EGF receptor signaling versus
that from two other tyrosine kinase receptors in SCLC cells is
interesting in light of the extensive overlap in signaling pathways
regulated by these receptors (reviewed in Ref. 59
). One
established outcome of EGF signaling is modulation of integrin
activation (60)
. Additional work is needed to determine
how the activation state of the
3ß1 integrin is differentially
regulated by IGF1 and EGF receptor signaling in SCLC and breast
carcinoma cells.
Extracellular matrix can be an important regulator of the
malignant phenotype. Blocking of ß1 integrin signaling in breast
carcinoma cells induced differentiation of the tumor cells with loss of
their malignant phenotype (61)
. TSP1 has been implicated
in suppressing growth or inducing differentiation of several tumor cell
types. TSP1 inhibits proliferation of melanoma cells (28)
and breast carcinoma cells (62)
. It also inhibits
proliferation of HL60 cells while inducing their differentiation
(63)
. Increased TSP1 expression is also associated with
retinoic acid-induced differentiation of neuroblastoma cells
(64)
. On the basis of the present data, TSP1 may
coordinately induce differentiation of SCLC and suppress its growth.
Attachment on murine laminin-1 induced increased expression of
differentiation markers on SCLC, although proliferation was not
inhibited (10)
. The laminin-1 effect may also be mediated
by
3ß1, although laminin-1 is not a high-affinity ligand for this
integrin (65)
.
SCLC cell lines fail to express TSP1 at the protein or mRNA level but consistently express TSP3 mRNA. p53 mutations, which are common in SCLC, may suppress TSP1 expression in these cells (23) . A minor population of lung cells was identified as a site of THBS3 gene expression in the mouse (66 , 67) . The cells that expressed TSP3 were not identified, but the present data suggest that neuroendocrine cells, from which SCLC may derive, are a source of TSP3 expression in lung.
Expression of receptors for TSP1 but not TSP1 may contribute to the tumor biology of SCLC. Because TSP1 is an inhibitor of angiogenesis (20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25) , lack of TSP1 expression may increase tumor growth by permitting neovascularization in response to angiogenic signals. Loss of TSP1 expression also may release the SCLC cells from the autocrine differentiating and antiproliferative activities of this matrix component and, therefore, may create an additional selective pressure to suppress TSP1 expression in SCLC cells.
Signals from the extracellular matrix may provide both positive (68) and, as demonstrated here, negative signals to control SCLC growth and survival. We have identified direct effects of soluble TSP1 and a synergistic interaction between a TSP1 matrix and EGF to suppress growth and increase neurotypic differentiation of SCLC. Inducing neuroendocrine differentiation of SCLC by a combination of TSP1 (or the integrin-binding peptide from TSP1) and EGF may facilitate treatment of this cancer because neuroendocrine differentiation is correlated with increased sensitivity of SCLC to radiotherapy (38) .
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Drs. Steven Akiyama (NIH, Research Triangle Park,
NC), David Cheresh, William Frazier, Adi Gazdar, Ralph Isberg
(Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA), Lance Liotta,
Joel Shaper, and Kenneth Yamada for providing reagents.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at NIH, National Cancer Institute, Building 10, Room 2A33,
10 Center Drive, MSC 1500, Bethesda, MD 20892-1500. Phone: (301)
496-6264; Fax: (301) 402-0043; E-mail: droberts{at}helix.nih.gov ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: SCLC, small cell
lung carcinoma; EGF, epidermal growth factor; IGF1, insulin-like growth
factor-1; mAb, monoclonal antibody; FGF, fibroblast growth factor; MBP,
maltose-binding protein; peptide 678, FQGVLQNVRFVF (TSP1 residues
190201); peptide 686, FQGVLQAVRFVF; peptide 690, FQGVLQNVAFVF;
peptide 246, KYRFKQDGGWSHWSPWSS (TSP1 residues 412428); peptide 7N3,
FIRVVMYEGKK (TSP1 residues 11021112); TSP1, thrombospondin-1; RT-PCR,
reverse transcription-PCR. ![]()
3 Roberts, D. D., unpublished
observations. ![]()
4 Chandrasekaran, L., He, C-Z., Krutzsch, H. C., Iruela-Arispe, M. L., and Roberts, D. D. Modulation of
endothelial cell behavior and angiogenesis by an
3ß1
integrin-binding peptide from thrombospondin-1, submitted for
publication. ![]()
5 Roberts, D. D., unpublished
observations. ![]()
Received 7/15/99. Accepted 11/11/99.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3ß1 integrin receptor and its ligands in human lung tumors. Int. J. Cancer, 64: 248-252, 1995.[Medline]
subunit gene at 3p21.3 in small cell lung cancer. Oncogene, 9: 611-619, 1994.[Medline]
6/ß4) expression in human lung cancer as monitored by specific monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Res., 50: 6107-6112, 1990.
vß3 function through integrin-associated protein. J. Cell Biol., 135: 533-544, 1996.
vß3 ligands to promote melanoma cell spreading and focal adhesion formation. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 22755-22762, 1999.
3ß1 integrin recognition sequence in thrombospondin-1. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 24080-24086, 1999.
3ß1 integrin: purification, processing, regulation, and specific binding to laminin-5 and invasin in a mutually exclusive manner. Biochemistry, 37: 10945-10955, 1998.[Medline]
-radiation in culture line OH-1 of human small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer Res., 42: 1361-1367, 1982.
chain mutations on invasin and natural ligand interaction. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 31837-31843, 1998.
4 ß 1 (VLA-4) and
5ß1 (VLA-5) integrins. J. Immunol., 151: 149-158, 1993.[Abstract]
3ß1 integrin and regulated by insulin-like growth factor-1 and CD98. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 11408-11416, 1999.
2ß1 integrin in vascular smooth muscle cells. Mol. Biol. Cell, 9: 865-874, 1998.
3ß1 as a neuronal thrombospondin receptor mediating neurite outgrowth. Neuron, 15: 333-343, 1995.[Medline]
3Aß1 and
6Aß1 integrins: recognition of laminin isoforms. Mol. Biol. Cell, 5: 203-215, 1994.[Abstract]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Ambrosino, M. Terabe, R. C. Halder, J. Peng, S. Takaku, S. Miyake, T. Yamamura, V. Kumar, and J. A. Berzofsky Cross-Regulation between Type I and Type II NKT Cells in Regulating Tumor Immunity: A New Immunoregulatory Axis J. Immunol., October 15, 2007; 179(8): 5126 - 5136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Behera, E. Hildebrand, S. Uematsu, S. Akira, J. Coburn, and L. T. Hu Identification of a TLR-Independent Pathway for Borrelia burgdorferi-Induced Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases and Inflammatory Mediators through Binding to Integrin {alpha}3beta1 J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 657 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Sutton, K. O'Byrne, J. C. Goddard, L.-J. Marshall, L. Jones, G. Garcea, A. R. Dennison, G. Poston, D. M. Lloyd, and D. P. Berry Expression of Thrombospondin-1 in Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases Predicts Poor Prognosis Clin. Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 11(18): 6567 - 6573. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Thomas-Tikhonenko, I. Viard-Leveugle, M. Dews, P. Wehrli, C. Sevignani, D. Yu, S. Ricci, W. el-Deiry, B. Aronow, G. Kaya, et al. Myc-Transformed Epithelial Cells Down-Regulate Clusterin, Which Inhibits Their Growth in Vitro and Carcinogenesis in Vivo Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 64(9): 3126 - 3136. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Araujo, E. Negreiros, and E. Bier Integrins modulate Sog activity in the Drosophila wing Development, August 15, 2003; 130(16): 3851 - 3864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. G. Sathyanarayana, S. Toyooka, A. Padar, T. Takahashi, E. Brambilla, J. D. Minna, and A. F. Gazdar Epigenetic Inactivation of Laminin-5-encoding Genes in Lung Cancers Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2003; 9(7): 2665 - 2672. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Tanaka, H. Sonoo, J. Kurebayashi, T. Nomura, S. Ohkubo, Y. Yamamoto, and S. Yamamoto Inhibition of Infiltration and Angiogenesis by Thrombospondin-1 in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 8(5): 1125 - 1131. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. O. Barazi, L. Zhou, N. S. Templeton, H. C. Krutzsch, and D. D. Roberts Identification of Heat Shock Protein 60 as a Molecular Mediator of {alpha}3{beta}1 Integrin Activation Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(5): 1541 - 1548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Li and T. G. Rossman Genes Upregulated in Lead-Resistant Glioma Cells Reveal Possible Targets for Lead-Induced Developmental Neurotoxicity Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 90 - 99. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Sargiannidou, J. Zhou, and G. P. Tuszynski The Role of Thrombospondin-1 in Tumor Progression Experimental Biology and Medicine, September 1, 2001; 226(8): 726 - 733. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Rodrigues, A. Panizo-Santos, J. A. Cashel, H. C. Krutzsch, M. J. Merino, and D. D. Roberts Semenogelins Are Ectopically Expressed in Small Cell Lung Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., April 1, 2001; 7(4): 854 - 860. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
L. Chandrasekaran, C.-Z. He, H. Al-Barazi, H. C. Krutzsch, M. L. Iruela-Arispe, and D. D. Roberts Cell Contact-dependent Activation of alpha 3beta 1 Integrin Modulates Endothelial Cell Responses to Thrombospondin-1 Mol. Biol. Cell, September 1, 2000; 11(9): 2885 - 2900. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
R. G. Rodrigues, N.-h. Guo, L. Zhou, J. M. Sipes, S. B. Williams, N. S. Templeton, H. R. Gralnick, and D. D. Roberts Conformational Regulation of the Fibronectin Binding and alpha 3beta 1 Integrin-mediated Adhesive Activities of Thrombospondin-1 J. Biol. Chem., July 20, 2001; 276(30): 27913 - 27922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |