
[Cancer Research 60, 474-480, January 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Heregulin Regulation of Autocrine Motility Factor Expression in Human Tumor Cells1
Amjad H. Talukder,
Liana Adam,
Avraham Raz and
Rakesh Kumar2
Cell Growth Regulation Laboratory, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [A. H. T., L. A., R. K.], and Metastasis Research Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201 [A. R.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
The exposure of cells to growth factors has been shown to induce
cytoskeleton reorganization, leading to stimulation of cell motility
and invasion. Heregulin ß1 (HRG), a combinatorial ligand for human
epidermal growth factor receptor 3 and human epidermal growth factor
receptor 4 receptors, is a regulatory secretory polypeptide with a
distinctive function in promoting motility and invasiveness of breast
cancer cells. In addition to HRG, motility and invasiveness of tumor
cells may also involve up-regulation of expression and function of the
autocrine motility factor (AMF). Here we explored the possible
involvement of AMF in the motility-promoting action of HRG in the MCF-7
breast cancer cell model system. We report that HRG increases the
expression of AMF mRNA by 38-fold in an actinomycin D-sensitive
manner and does not require de novo protein synthesis.
The HRG-induced stimulation of AMF expression was inhibited by specific
inhibitors of p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK kinases,
but not by an inhibitor of the phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase pathway.
Other HRG-responsive human cell lines demonstrated that HRG does indeed
significantly up-regulate AMF expression. Furthermore, HRG-stimulated
increased motility was partially suppressed by inclusion of an anti-AMF
antibody to breast cancer cells, suggesting that a HRG-mediated
increase in cell motility may be mediated, at least in part, via
induction of AMF. The present study is the first demonstration of AMF
regulation by a growth factor and suggests a potential role for AMF in
HRG regulation of breast cancer cell motility and a novel function of
HRG as a regulator of motility factor expression.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Growth factors and their receptor interactions play an essential
role in the regulation of epithelial cell proliferation, and
abnormalities in growth factor expression and action may contribute to
the progression and maintenance of the malignant phenotype. For
example,
HER23
overexpression is frequently (in 30% of patients with breast cancer)
associated with an aggressive clinical course, shorter disease-free
survival time, poor prognosis, decreased sensitivity to
chemotherapeutics, and increased metastasis in human breast cancer
(1)
. Recently, additional members, HER3 and HER4, have
been added to the HER2 family. All HER receptors share a sequence
homology with the tyrosine kinase domain of HER1 (2, 3, 4)
.
The regulation of HER family members is complex because HER family
receptors can be transactivated by receptor-receptor interaction in a
ligand-dependent manner (3)
and can therefore use more
than one pathway to transduce their biological functions. For example,
HER3 and HER4 receptors bind to more than a dozen isoforms of HRGs or
neu differentiation factors (5
, 6)
and can activate the
HER2 receptor due to heterodimeric interactions (3
, 4
, 7)
.
HRG stimulation of breast cancer cells enhances activation of PI3k,
mitogen-activated protein kinase, and p38MAPK
kinase (8
, 9)
. A ligand that interacts with HER2 in the
absence of other HER family members has yet to be identified. In recent
years, accumulating evidence suggests that the progression of human
breast cancer cells may be regulated by HRG, a combinatorial ligand for
HER3 and HER4 receptors (5
, 6) . Recently, we and others
(9, 10, 11, 12)
have demonstrated that HRG activation of breast
cancer cells (in the absence of HER2 overexpression) also promotes the
development of more aggressive phenotypes in breast cancer cells. The
activation of HRG signaling (10
, 13)
, activator protein 1
(14)
, and nuclear factor
B (15)
pathways
has also been linked with the progression of breast cancer cells to a
more invasive phenotype. These observations suggest that ligand-driven
activation of HER receptors may play an important biological role or
roles in the progression of breast cancer cells to a malignant
phenotype. The nature of the pathways by which HRG signals may modulate
the expression of the motility factor or factors remains poorly
understood.
The exposure of cells to growth factors has been shown to cause
cytoskeleton reorganization, formation of lamellipodia, membrane
ruffling, and altered cell morphology and has accordingly been
implicated in stimulating cell migration and invasion (16
, 17)
. Most eukaryotic cells possess the capacity to migrate over
or through a substrate, and cell motility plays a key role in both
normal and pathological cellular physiology, exemplified in the latter
by invasion and metastasis (18)
. In many tissues, cells
are stationary, but motility can be activated by appropriate stimuli,
oncogenic transformation, or both. In fact, one of the earliest
responses of cells to many extracellular growth factors is rapid
reorganization of their cytoskeleton and cell shape.
In addition to HRG action, it is increasing accepted that the
progression of breast cancer cells to a more invasive phenotype may
also involve the AMF (19)
. AMF was originally
distinguished by its ability to stimulate the migration of
AMF-producing tumor cells via a receptor (gp78)-mediated pathway
(20, 21, 22)
. Recently, the AMF has been identified as
phosphohexose isomerase, a molecule previously described as the
extracellular cytokine neuroleukin (23)
. In light of their
motility-regulating effects, the AMF and its receptor have been
proposed to play a role in the metastasis of cancer (24)
.
Expression of the AMF pathway correlates well with disease progression
in numerous cancers including colorectal, bladder, esophageal, and
gastric cancer (25, 26, 27, 28)
.
HRG was shown to stimulate the motility and invasiveness of human
breast cancer cells (9
, 13)
, but it is still unknown
whether there is any role for AMF in the noticed action of HRG in
breast cancer cells. Here we investigate HRGs potential regulation of
AMF expression and function in breast cancer cells and demonstrate that
HRG stimulation of noninvasive MCF-7 human breast cancer cells leads to
the induction of expression of AMF mRNA and protein. Extension of these
observations to two other HRG-responsive human cell lines also
demonstrates a significant capacity of HRG to up-regulate AMF
expression. The HRG-induced stimulation of AMF expression was
suppressed by specific inhibitors of p42/44MAPK
and p38MAPK kinases, but not by an inhibitor of
the PI3k pathway. Furthermore, HRG-stimulated enhancement of cell
motility-associated changes such as cell scattering and actin
reorganization in breast cancer cells was partially suppressed by
monospecific anti-AMF polyclonal Ab. The present study is the first to
show regulation of AMF expression by a polypeptide growth factor and
suggests that AMF may have an augmenting role in HRGs regulation of
breast cancer cells.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Cell Cultures and Reagents.
Human breast cancer MCF-7 cells (9)
and colorectal
carcinoma cell lines LS174T, CaCo-2, and FET (29)
were
maintained in DMEM:Hams F-12 (1:1) supplemented with 10% FCS.
Recombinant HRG was purchased from Neomarkers, Inc. (Freemont, CA), and
secondary Abs were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO)
and Molecular Probes. Monospecific polyclonal Ab directed against AMF
was generated by immunization with a synthetic peptide
YFQQGDMESNGKYITK, corresponding to amino acids 351366 of human AMF,
as described previously (19)
.
Cell Extracts and Immunoprecipitation.
To prepare cell extracts, the cells were washed three times with
PBS and lysed in buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 120
mM NaCl, 0.5% NP40, 100 mM NaF, 200
mM NaVO5, 1 mM
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml
aprotinin] for 15 min on ice. The lysates were centrifuged in an
Eppendorf centrifuge at 4°C for 15 min. Cell lysates containing equal
amounts of protein were resolved on a SDS-PAGE, transferred to
nitrocellulose, and probed with the appropriate Abs. An equal number of
cells were metabolically labeled for 12 h with 100 µCi/ml
[35S]methionine in methionine-free medium
containing 2% dialyzed fetal bovine serum in the absence or presence
of HRG. Cell extracts (equal perceptible trichloroacetic acid
counts) were immunoprecipitated with the desired Ab or control Ab,
resolved on a SDS-PAGE gel, and analyzed by autoradiography
(30)
.
Northern Hybridization.
Total RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent, and 20 µg of each RNA
were resolved on a 1% agarose gel after ethidium bromide staining. A
1.1-kb human cDNA fragment was used as a probe (19)
. GAPDH
levels were used to assess the integrity of the RNA and of the
RNA-loading control.
Analysis of F-Actin Distribution and Cell Scattering.
For F-actin staining, cells cultured on glass coverslips or in chamber
slides (Falcon) were fixed with 3.7% paraformaldehyde, followed by a
short incubation with acetone at -20°C as indicated by the
manufacturer. In some cases, coverslips were coated with a thin layer
of Matrigel before the cells were plated. After 5 h of HRG
treatment, coverslips were incubated for 24 h with anti-AMF Ab
(1:10 dilution) or rabbit preimmune serum, fixed with paraformalin.
Rhodamine phalloidin was added for 30 min at ambient temperature to
stain the filamentous actin. Coverslips were mounted using the Slow
Fade Antifade kit (Molecular Probes). For indirect immunofluorescence,
fixed cells were washed two times with PBS and blocked by incubation
with 10% normal goat serum (Sigma) in PBS for 1 h at ambient
temperature. Cells were then allowed to react for 1 h at ambient
temperature with the AMF Ab (19)
. After four washes in
PBS, the cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated goat antirabbit IgG
(Molecular Probes) at a 1:100 dilution in 10% normal goat serum in
PBS. For controls, some cells were only treated with the secondary Ab,
and the primary Ab was omitted; no signals were detected in untreated
control cells. Cells were viewed with an inverted Zeiss Axioplan
fluorescence microscope with a charge-coupled device camera, using
IP-Lab Spectrum software. Each image represents Z-sections at the same
cellular level and magnification. In some of these cases, the
transmission mode was also used on the same microscopic field to
visualize the entire cell or quantified by confocal microscopy (Leiss
LSM). For quantitation of cell scattering, seven random fields (x20
magnification) of cells were counted, and the percentage of scattered
cells was recorded.
Immunostaining Studies and FACS.
Cellular localization of AMF was determined using confocal microscopy
as described previously (9)
. Briefly, cells grown on glass
coverslips were fixed in methanol at -20°C for 10 min. Several
dilutions of Ab were used to obtain the optimal results. DNA was
stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (blue). For staining of AMF
expression on the cell surface, cells were treated with anti-AMF Ab
followed by a FITC-labeled secondary Ab (Molecular Probes). Control
cells were treated only with secondary Ab. After gating the cells
against the dead cells, as described previously (19)
, cell
surface expression of AMF was quantitated by FACS scanning using the
anti-AMF Ab or preimmune serum and FITC-tagged antirabbit IgG.
Human Tissue Samples.
Human breast tissue samples were obtained from patients who had surgery
for breast cancer, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C
(13)
. Three samples each of grade 2 and grade 3 disease
were analyzed (13)
. The tissue samples were homogenized in
TritonX-100 lysis buffer [20 mM HEPES, 150 mM
NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% deoxycholate (v/w), 2 mM
EDTA, 2 mM EDTA, 2 mM sodium orthovanadate, and
protease inhibitor mixture (Boehringer Mannheim)], and equal amount of
proteins were analyzed by Western blotting.
 |
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Regulation of AMF mRNA Expression by HRG.
To examine the potential involvement of AMF in the action of HRG, we
explored the regulation of AMF mRNA expression in MCF-7 cells, which
are known to respond to HRG by increased cell motility (9
, 13)
. Total RNA was isolated from control cells and HRG-treated
cells, and expression of AMF mRNA was analyzed by Northern
hybridization using a cDNA to human AMF (19)
. Data in Fig. 1A
demonstrate that HRG increases the steady-state levels of
the 1.6-kb transcript of AMF by 26-fold in MCF-7 cells, with the
maximal induction taking place between 3 and 12 h after HRG
treatment, followed by a decline to near basal levels by 24 h. The
observed up-regulation of AMF mRNA in MCF-7 cells was a specific effect
of HRG because there was no effect of HRG on the expression of the AMF
receptor gp78 (Fig. 1B
).

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. HRG regulation of AMF mRNA expression.
A, MCF-7 cells were treated with HRG for the indicated
times. Total RNA (20 µg) was analyzed by Northern blotting using a
AMF cDNA probe. The blot was reprobed with GAPDH cDNA probe.
Quantitation of AMF mRNA is shown in the bottom panel.
B, total RNA levels from MCF-7 cells were analyzed by
Northern blotting with AMF cDNA and reprobed with gp78 cDNA.
|
|
HRG may enhance the expression of AMF mRNA due to increased synthesis
of newly transcribed mRNA, increased stability, or both. To determine
which of these was the case, we examined the effect of
actinomycin D, an inhibitor of transcription, on specific mRNA
expression. Pretreatment of cells with actinomycin D completely
abolished the HRG-mediated induction of AMF mRNA, suggesting that HRG
regulates AMF at the transcriptional level (Fig. 2
). To study translational regulation, we used cycloheximide, a
translational inhibitor. Cycloheximide inhibited the expression of AMF
mRNA (Fig. 2
, compare Lane 4 with Lane 1),
while HRG treatment further stimulated the expression of AMF mRNA
compared to the level in cycloheximide treated culture (Fig. 2
,
compare Lane 3 with Lane 4), suggesting no
requirement for a de novo protein synthesis for HRG-mediated
stimulation of AMF mRNA expression.

View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. HRG induces AMF transcription. MCF-7 cells were treated
with cycloheximide (50 µg/ml) or actinomycin D (10 µg/ml) in the
presence or absence of HRG (10 ng/ml) for 3 h. Total RNA was
isolated, and the levels of AMF mRNA were as detected by Northern
blotting. The blot was reprobed with a GAPDH cDNA probe. Quantitation
of AMF mRNA is shown in the bottom panel.
|
|
HRG is known to activate a number of signaling pathways, including
PI3k, p42/44MAPK, and
p38MAPK pathways (9)
. As expected,
HRG treatment of MCF-7 cells stimulated the activation of PI3k,
p42/44MAPK, and p38MAPK via
a kinetic mechanism similar to HER2 phosphorylation (date not
shown). To understand the nature of the HRG signaling pathway leading to AMF
mRNA expression, we used three inhibitors (Ly294002, PD980599, and
SB203580) that specifically inhibit PI3k,
p42/44MAPK, and p38MAPK,
respectively. Pretreatment of cells with Ly294002 had no inhibitory
effect on the HRG-mediated up-regulation of AMF mRNA (Fig. 3
,
bottom panel). In contrast, treatment of cells with PD98059
(Lane 4) or SB203580 (Lane 3) prevented
HRG-induced enhanced expression of AMF mRNA (Fig. 3
, bottom
panel). In brief, these results suggest that
p42/44MAPK and p38MAPK
pathways may be involved in HRG-mediated stimulation of AMF.

View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 3. Effects of inhibitors PD98059, SB203580, and LY294002 on
AMF expression in HRG-treated cells. MCF-7 cells pretreated for 30 min
with or without inhibitors were cultured with or without HRG for 4 h. Total RNA was isolated, and expression of AMF mRNA was detected by
Northern blotting. The blot was reprobed with a GAPDH cDNA probe.
Quantitation of AMF mRNA is shown in the bottom panel.
|
|
HRG Induces the Expression of AMF Protein.
Recently, AMF has been shown to exist in five variant forms,
Mr 65,000,
Mr 57,000,
Mr 46,000,
Mr 38,000, and
Mr 31,000 in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells
(19)
. It was proposed that these AMF forms may be derived
from a single gene by alternative splicing, posttranslational
modifications, or both (19)
. To determine whether the
observed increase in the level of AMF mRNA in HRG-treated MCF-7 breast
cancer cells was associated with an increase in the expression of AMF
protein, Western blot analysis was performed. The results in Fig. 4A
demonstrate that MCF-7 cells responded to HRG by a
significant specific increase in the level of the
Mr 38,000 form of AMF protein, which
was not detected by preimmune serum. Because earlier studies have shown
that the Mr 57,000 form of AMF may be
secreted in HT1080 fibrosarcoma cells (19)
, we also
examined the expression of AMF in the conditioned medium of MCF-7 cells
treated with or without HRG (Fig. 4B
). In contrast to the
fibrosarcoma cells, HRG treatment appears to increase the accumulation
of the Mr 38,000 form of AMF in
epithelial cells. To further validate the induction of AMF in
HRG-treated cells, we examined the synthesis of AMF protein in MCF-7
cells metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine. HRG treatment resulted in the
increased expression of newly synthesized AMF within 8 h (Fig. 4C
).

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. HRG up-regulates the level of AMF protein.
A, MCF-7 cells were treated with HRG for the indicated
times. Total lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted with anti-AMF
Ab, and subsequently reprobed with preimmune serum. B,
conditioned medium from control and HRG-treated MCF-7 cells was
concentrated, analyzed by SDS-PAGE, immunoblotted with anti-AMF Ab
(Lanes 13), and reprobed with preimmune serum
(Lanes 13). C, MCF-7 cells were
stimulated with HRG for 8 h and metabolically labeled with
[35S]methionine during the last 4 h before
harvesting. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with an anti-AMF Ab
and analyzed by SDS-PAGE, followed by fluorography. *, AMF protein.
|
|
To further characterize the regulation of AMF expression in HRG-treated
cells, we next examined the redistribution of the AMF protein by
indirect immunofluorescence and by confocal analysis. To identify the
nuclei, we used the DNA intercalating agent
4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. The AMF protein was detected using a
FITC-coupled secondary goat Ab directed against the polyclonal rabbit
anti-AMF Ab. The AMF protein was localized primarily in the cytoplasm
in MCF-7 cells (Fig. 5A
). The observed AMF staining was specific because there was
no such immunoreactivity with the preimmune serum (data not shown).
After the HRG treatment, AMF accumulated in the cytoplasm, as shown by
an increased intense staining (Fig. 5
). However, in HRG-treated cells,
a significant amount of AMF was also localized at intercellular
boundaries as well as in the plasma membrane. Taken together, the
results demonstrated that HRG-induced AMF expression was accompanied by
an alteration in the subcellular distribution of AMF.

View larger version (103K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 5. Localization of AMF in HRG-treated cells by
immunofluorescence microscopy. MCF-7 cells were treated with HRG
(B, D, and E) or without HRG
(A and C) for 6 h. Representative
microscopic fields of control and HRG-treated MCF-7 cells were analyzed
by indirect immunofluorescence (A and B),
by confocal scanning of Z-sections at a similar level (C,
D, and E), or by corresponding transmitted mode
microscopy (C' and D'). White
arrows, AMF; black arrows, AMF location in the
same field under transmission mode. Note that treatment with HRG
resulted in membranous AMF immunostaining (compare B, D,
and E with A and C).
|
|
An enhancement of AMF immunoreactivity at the plasma membrane
suggested that HRG stimulation may be related to an increase in
membrane-bound AMF in MCF-7 cells. To explore this possibility, we
analyzed the cell surface expression of AMF by flow cytometry using
anti-AMF Ab and fluorescence (FITC)-tagged antirabbit IgG on unfixed
cells (Fig. 6
). The mean fluorescence of control cells was 1520%, and this was
increased to 45% by HRG treatment. These results indicated that
HRG-mediated up-regulation of AMF was accompanied by an increase of
cell surface expression of AMF in MCF-7 cells. The increase in the
level of cell surface AMF was specific because there was no such
increase when preimmune serum was used.

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 6. Cell surface analysis of AMF expression by FACS. MCF-7
cells were treated with or without HRG for 24 h. Single-cell
suspensions were prepared, and equal numbers of cells from each
condition were analyzed by using anti-AMF Ab or preimmune serum and
fluorescence (FITC)-tagged anti-rabbit IgG. After gating against
the dead cells, cell surface AMF expression was quantitated by FACS
scanning.
|
|
Effect of Anti-AMF Ab on HRG-mediated Increased Cell Motility.
Because HRG has previously been shown to be a potent motogen (9
, 13)
and induces AMF expression, and because AMF stimulates cell
motility in other cell types (this study) (31
, 32)
, we
explored the possibility of a meditative role of AMF during HRG-induced
cell motility. As seen in Fig. 7
, anti-AMF Ab, but not preimmune serum, suppressed the cell scattering
by 40% in HRG-treated MCF-7 cells, suggesting that the HRG-mediated
increase in cell motility may involve, at least in part, AMF in MCF-7
cells.

View larger version (124K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 7. Effect of anti-AMF Ab on HRG-induced cell scattering.
MCF-7 cells were treated without (A) or with HRG for
24 h (B and C) in the presence
(C) or absence (B) of anti-AMF Ab.
Expression of F-actin was determined by FITC-anti-rabbit Ab as
described in "Materials and Methods." The effect of anti-AMF Ab on
HRG-induced cell scattering is shown in D (Lane
1, control; Lane 2, HRG; Lane 3,
anti-AMF Ab + HRG; Lane 4, anti-AMF Ab only;
Lane 5, nonspecific Ab + HRG; Lane
6, nonspecific Ab only). Results are expressed as the
percentage of total cells/field x20.
|
|
HRG Regulates AMF Expression in Diversified Cell Types.
To determine whether the observed induction of AMF expression is an
effect restricted to MCF-7 cells or more general to HRG-responsive
cells, we examined the HRG-AMF relationship in HRG-responsive human
colorectal FET and LS174T cells (28)
. As illustrated in
Fig. 8
, HRG treatment led to a significant up-regulation of AMF mRNA
expression in tumor cells (Fig. 8A
). The observed induction
of AMF mRNA expression may not be a universal property of stimulatory
growth factors, because transforming growth factor
and
HB-epidermal growth factor only modestly induced AMF mRNA
expression in FET cells (Fig. 8B
). These results suggest
that AMF expression could be up-regulated more effectively by a
polypeptide factor with motility-promoting action, such as HRG.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 8. HRG stimulates AMF expression in multiple cell lines.
A, FET and LS174T colon cancer cell lines were treated
with or without HRG for the indicated times, and AMF mRNA expression
was determined by Northern blotting. The blot was sequentially reprobed
with GAPDH probe, and quantitation of AMF mRNA is shown in the
bottom panel. B, FET and MCF-7 cells were
treated with the indicated factors, and AMF mRNA expression was
determined by Northern blotting.
|
|
AMF Expression and Breast Cancer.
Because HER family members are known to be overexpressed in a number of
tumors and cancer cell lines, we explored the potential relationship
between the levels of HER family members and AMF expression. There was
no correlation between the status of HER family members and expression
of AMF variants, at least in the seven breast cancer cell lines
analyzed in this study (Fig. 9A
). However, the Mr 38,000
form of AMF was readily detectable in cells with tumorigenic potential
(such as BT-474 and MDA-453 cells) or metastatic potential (such as
MDA-435 cells). These results suggested that breast cancer cells may
express certain variants of AMF, the regulation of which may be
complex. We also examined AMF expression in a small number of tumor
biopsy samples. Three samples each from grade 2 and grade 3 breast
tumors were analyzed. In general, grade 3 specimens had a higher level
of AMF variants than grade 2 specimens (Fig. 9B
). Additional
studies using a large number of clinical samples are needed to confirm
these findings.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 9. AMF expression and breast cancer. A,
status of AMF protein expression in human breast cancer cell lines.
Equal amounts of protein from exponentially growing cells were analyzed
by immunoblotting using anti-AMF Ab. Blots were reprobed with
preimmune serum. B, breast tumor biopsy samples were
homogenized in lysis buffer, and equal amounts of protein were loaded
on SDS-PAGE gels, immunoblotted with anti-AMF Ab, and reprobed with
preimmune serum.
|
|
Abnormality in the action of the HER2 receptor and HRG, which activates
the HER2 receptor via its binding to HER3 or HER4 receptors, has been
shown to be frequently associated with increased motility and
progression of breast cancer cells to a more invasive and aggressive
phenotype. Because both motility and invasiveness of human tumors have
been shown to be influenced by AMF, we questioned the regulation of AMF
expression by HRG and showed that HRG enhances the AMF expression of
AMF mRNA without de novo protein synthesis. The observed
HRG-induced stimulation of cell motility was accompanied by increased
expression of cellular AMF protein and localization of AMF at the cell
surface, and cotreatment with anti-AMF Ab (but not preimmune serum)
partially blocked HRG-induced cell motility. Another notable finding
was the possible involvement of p44/42MAPK and
p38MAPK in mediating the stimulation of AMF mRNA
by HRG. In this context, we recently demonstrated that inhibition of
p38MAPK leads to suppression of HRG-induced
stimulation of cell spreading and scattering of breast cancer cells
(13
, 33)
. Because AMF has been shown to promote cell
spreading (33)
, and because HRG may use the
p38MAPK-dependent signal transduction pathway to
induce both cell spreading (33)
and AMF expression (this
study), the role of p38MAPK in the action of HRG
may be important. However, inducible expression of AMF may also
involve distinctive HRG-initiated signals such as
p44/42MAPK, which may not be required for
HRG-induced cell spreading and scattering effects (33)
.
These results suggest that different functions of HRG may be regulated
by a combination of specific and overlapping signaling pathways. This
hypothesis is further supported by our recent finding that HRG
stimulation of PI3k is required for actin reorganization
(9)
but does not influence cell spreading
(13)
or AMF expression (this study). In summary, we show
here that HRG may also induce the expression of other motogen molecules
such as AMF that in concept may contribute to the motility and invasive
phenotypes.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported in part by NIH Grants CA80066 and
CA65746, and Breast Cancer Research Program of the University of Texas
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (to R. K.) and NIH Grant CA51714 (to
A. R.). 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Cell Growth Regulation, Box 36, The University of Texas
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX
77030. E-mail: rkumar{at}notes.mdacc.tmc.edu 
3 The abbreviations used are: HER, human epidermal
growth factor receptor, HRG, heregulin ß1; AMF, autocrine motility
factor; PI3k, phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase; Ab, antibody; GAPDH,
glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; FACS, fluorescence-activated
cell sorting. 
Received 6/29/99.
Accepted 11/12/99.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Slamon D. J., Clark G. M., Wong S. G., Levin W. J., Ullrich A., McGuire W. L. Human breast cancer: correlation of relapse and survival with amplification of the HER-2/neu oncogene. Science (Washington DC), 235: 77-82, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Plowman G. D., Green J. M., Culouscou J. M., Carlton G. W., Rothwell V. M., Buckley S. Heregulin induces tyrosine phosphorylation of HER4/p180erbB4. Nature (Lond.), 366: 473-475, 1993.[Medline]
-
Hynes N. C., Stern D. F. The biology of erbB2/neu/HER2 and its role in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1198: 165-184, 1994.[Medline]
-
Carraway K., Cantley L. A neu acquaintance for erbB3 and erbB4: a role for receptor heterodimerization in growth signaling. Cell, 78: 5-8, 1994.[Medline]
-
Peles E., Bacus S. S., Koski R. A., Lu H. S., Wen D., Ogden S. G., Levy R. B., Yarden Y. Isolation of the Neu/HER2 stimulatory ligand: a 44 kD protein in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cell lines. Cell, 69: 205-216, 1992.[Medline]
-
Wen D., Peles E., Cupples R., Suggs S. V., Bacus S. S., Luo Y., Trail G., Hu S., Silbiger S. M., Levy B. Neu differentiating factor: a transmembrane glycoprotein containing an EGF domain and an immunoglobulin homology unit. Cell, 69: 559-572, 1992.[Medline]
-
Graus-Ponta D., Beerli R. R., Daly J. M., Hynes N. E. ErbB-2, the preferred heterodimerization partner of all ErbB receptors, is a mediator of lateral signaling. EMBO J., 16: 1647-1655, 1997.[Medline]
-
Reese D. M., Slamon D. J. Her2/neu signal transduction in human breast and ovarian cancer. Stem Cells, 15: 1-8, 1997.[Medline]
-
Adam L., Vadlamudi R., Kondapaka S. B., Chernoff J., Mendelsohn J., Kumar R. Heregulin regulates cytoskeletal reorganization and cell migration through the p21-activated kinase-1 via phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 28238-28246, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pietras R. J., Arboleda J., Reese D. M., Wongvipat N., Pegram M. D., Ramos L., Gorman C. M., Parker M. G., Sliwkowski M. X., Slamon D. J. HER-2 tyrosine kinase pathway targets estrogen receptor and promotes hormone-independent growth in human breast cancer cells. Oncogene, 10: 2435-2446, 1995.[Medline]
-
Kumar R., Mandal M., Ratzkin B. J., Liu N., Lipton A. NDF induces expression of a novel 46 kd protein in estrogen receptor positive breast cancer cells. J. Cell. Biochem., 62: 102-112, 1995.
-
Tang C. K., Perez C., Grunt T., Waibel C., Cho C., Lupu R. Involvement of heregulin ß2 in the acquisition of the hormone-independent phenotype of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 56: 3350-3358, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vadlamudi R., Adam L., Costa L., Kumar R. Transcriptional up-regulation of paxillin by heregulin in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Res., 59: 2843-2846, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dumont J. A., Bitonti A. J., Wallace C. D., Baumann R. J., Cashman E. A., Cross-Doersen D. E. Progression of MCF-7 breast cancer cells to antiestrogen-resistant phenotype is accompanied by elevated levels of AP-1 DNA-binding activity. Cell Growth Differ., 7: 351-359, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Nakshatri H., Bhat-Nakshatri P., Martin D. A., Goulet R. J., Jr., Sledge G. W., Jr. Constitutive activation of NF-
B during progression of breast cancer to hormone-independent growth. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 3629-3639, 1997.[Abstract]
-
Mitchison T. J., Cramer L. P. Actin based cell motility and cell locomotion. Cell, 84: 371-379, 1996.[Medline]
-
Burridge K., Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M., Zhong C. Focal adhesion assembly. Trends Cell Biol., 7: 342-347, 1997.[Medline]
-
Bergman M., Joukov V., Virtanen I., Alitalo K. Overexpressed Crk tyrosine kinase is localized in focal adhesions, causes reorganization of
vß integrin, and interferes with HeLa cell spreading. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 711-722, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Niinaka Y., Paku S., Haga A., Watanabe H., Raz A. Expression and secretion of neuroleukin/phosphohexose isomerase/maturation factor as autocrine motility factor by tumor cells. Cancer Res., 58: 2667-2674, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Benlimame N., Le P. U., Nabi I. R. Localization of autocrine motility factor receptor to caveolae and clathrin-independent internalization of its ligand to smooth endoplasmic reticulum. Mol. Biol. Cell, 9: 1773-1786, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Silletti S., Raz A. Regulation of autocrine motility factor receptor expression in tumor cell locomotion and metastasis. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol., 213: 137-169, 1996.
-
Liotta L. A., Mandler R., Murano G., Katz D. A., Gordon R. K., Chiang P. K., Schiffmann E. Tumor cell autocrine motility factor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 3302-3306, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Silletti S., Timar J., Honn K. V., Raz A. Regulation of tumor cell motility by 12(S)-HETE. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 400B: 683-692, 1997.
-
Silletti S., Raz A. Autocrine motility factor is a growth factor. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 194: 446-457, 1996.
-
Baumann M., Brand K. Purification and characterization of phosphohexose isomerase from human gastrointestinal carcinoma and its potential relationship to neuroleukin. Cancer Res., 48: 7018-7021, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Baumann M., Kappl A., Lang T., Brand K., Siegfried W., Paterok E. The diagnostic validity of the serum tumor marker phosphohexose isomerase (PHI) in patients with gastrointestinal, kidney, and breast cancer. Cancer Investig., 8: 351-356, 1990.[Medline]
-
Filella X., Molina R., Jo J., Mas E., Ballesta A. M. Serum phosphohexose isomerase activities in patients with colorectal cancer. Tumour Biol., 12: 360-367, 1991.[Medline]
-
Patel P. S., Raval G. N., Rawal R. M., Patel G. H., Balar D. B., Shah P. M., Patel D. D. Comparison between serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen, sialic acid and phosphohexose isomerase in lung cancer. Neoplasma, 42: 271-274, 1995.[Medline]
-
Vadlamudi R., Mandal M., Adam L., Steinbach G., Mendelsohn J., Kumar R. Regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 pathway by HER2 receptor. Oncogene, 18: 305-314, 1999.[Medline]
-
Kumar R., Atlas I. Interferon
induces the expression of retinoblastoma gene product in human Burkitt lymphoma Daudi cells: role in growth regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 6599-6603, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Silletti S., Paku S., Raz A. Autocrine motility factor and the extracellular matrix. I. Coordinate regulation of melanoma cell adhesion, spreading and migration involves focal contact reorganization. Int. J. Cancer, 76: 120-128, 1998.[Medline]
-
Silletti S., Paku S., Raz A. Autocrine motility factor and the extracellular matrix. II. Degradation or remodeling of substratum components directs the motile response of tumor cells. Int. J. Cancer, 76: 129-135, 1998.[Medline]
-
Vadlamudi R., Adam L., Talukder A., Mendelsohn J., Kumar R. Serine phosphorylation paxillin by heregulin: role of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase. Oncogene, 18: 7253-7264, 1999.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
G A Clines and T A Guise
Hypercalcaemia of malignancy and basic research on mechanisms responsible for osteolytic and osteoblastic metastasis to bone
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
September 1, 2005;
12(3):
549 - 583.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Mishra, A. Raz, and L. J. Murphy
Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Interacts with Autocrine Motility Factor/Phosphoglucose Isomerase (AMF/PGI) and Inhibits the AMF/PGI Function
Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2004;
64(7):
2516 - 2522.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Canto, E. Suarez, J. M. Lizcano, E. Grino, P. R. Shepherd, L. G. D. Fryer, D. Carling, J. Bertran, M. Palacin, A. Zorzano, et al.
Neuregulin Signaling on Glucose Transport in Muscle Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
March 26, 2004;
279(13):
12260 - 12268.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P.-W. Tsai, S.-G. Shiah, M.-T. Lin, C.-W. Wu, and M.-L. Kuo
Up-regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor C in Breast Cancer Cells by Heregulin-beta 1. A CRITICAL ROLE OF p38/NUCLEAR FACTOR-kappa B SIGNALING PATHWAY
J. Biol. Chem.,
February 14, 2003;
278(8):
5750 - 5759.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Talukder, R. Bagheri-Yarmand, R. R. E. Williams, J. Ragoussis, R. Kumar, and A. Raz
Antihuman Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Antibody Herceptin Inhibits Autocrine Motility Factor (AMF) Expression and Potentiates Antitumor Effects of AMF Inhibitors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2002;
8(10):
3285 - 3289.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Tsutsumi, S. K. Gupta, V. Hogan, J. G. Collard, and A. Raz
Activation of Small GTPase Rho Is Required for Autocrine Motility Factor Signaling
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2002;
62(15):
4484 - 4490.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Xiong, R. Grijalva, L. Zhang, N. T. Nguyen, P. W. Pisters, R. E. Pollock, and D. Yu
Up-Regulation of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor in Breast Cancer Cells by the Heregulin-{beta}1-activated p38 Signaling Pathway Enhances Endothelial Cell Migration
Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2001;
61(4):
1727 - 1732.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|