Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Orr, F. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wang, H. H.
Right arrow Articles by Orr, F. W.
[Cancer Research 60, 5862-5869, October 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

B16 Melanoma Cell Arrest in the Mouse Liver Induces Nitric Oxide Release and Sinusoidal Cytotoxicity: A Natural Hepatic Defense against Metastasis1

Hui Helen Wang, Alan R. McIntosh, Brian B. Hasinoff, Edward S. Rector, Naeem Ahmed, Dwight M. Nance and F. William Orr2

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E OW3 [H. H. W., E. S. R., N. A., D. M. N., F. W. O.], and Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3T 2N2 [A. R. M., B. B. H.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The formation of liver metastases involves interactions between intravascular cancer cells and the hepatic microvasculature. Here we provide evidence that the arrest of intravascular B16F1 melanoma cells in the liver induces a rapid local release of nitric oxide (NO) that causes apoptosis of the melanoma cells and inhibits their subsequent development into hepatic metastases. B16F1 melanoma cells (5 x 105) labeled with fluorescent microspheres were injected into the portal circulation of C57BL/6 mice. The production of NO in vivo was detected by electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy ex vivo using an exogenous NO-trapping agent. A burst of NO was observed in liver samples examined immediately after tumor cell injection. The relative electron paramagnetic resonance signal intensity was 667 ± 143 units in mice injected with tumor cells versus 28 ± 5 units after saline injection (P < 0.001). Two-thirds of cells arrested in the sinusoids compared with the terminal portal venules (TPVs). By double labeling of B16F1 cells with fluorescent microspheres and a TdT-mediated UTP end labeling assay, we determined that the melanoma cells underwent apoptosis from 4–24 h after arrest. The mean rate of apoptosis was 2-fold greater in the sinusoids than in the TPVs at 4, 8, and 24 h after injection (P < 0.05–0.01). Apoptotic cells accounted for 15.9 ± 0.8% of tumor cells located in the sinusoids and 7.1 ± 0.9% of tumor cells in the TPVs. The NO synthase inhibitor NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester completely blocked the NO burst (P < 0.001) and inhibited the apoptosis of B16F1 cells in the sinusoids by 77%. However, the rate of tumor cell apoptosis in the TPVs was not changed. There were 5-fold more metastatic nodules in the livers of NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester-treated mice (P < 0.05). The inactive enantiomer NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester had no effect on the initial NO burst or on apoptosis of tumor cells in vivo. Both annexin V phosphatidylserine plasma membrane labeling and DNA end labeling of apoptotic cells were demonstrated after a 5-min exposure (a time equivalent to the initial transient NO induction in vivo) of B16F1 cells to a NO donor in vitro. These results identify the existence of a natural defense mechanism against cancer metastasis whereby the arrest of tumor cells in the liver induces endogenous NO release, leading to sinusoidal tumor cell killing and reduced hepatic metastasis formation.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The formation of liver metastases involves interactions between intravascular cancer cells and the hepatic microvasculature (1) . Hepatic microvascular functions of potential importance in tumor cell-endothelial interactions include the expression of adhesion molecules and release of reactive oxygen species (e.g., NO,3 O, and H2O2) under physiological and pathological conditions (1, 2, 3) . Evidence from in vitro studies has shown that reactive oxygen and nitrogen species may be cytotoxic to neoplastic cells that are adherent to the hepatic sinusoidal endothelium derived from ischemic or IL-1-stimulated mouse livers (4 , 5) . However, little in vivo data are available on the involvement of endothelium-derived NO in the mechanism of hepatic metastasis (6) .

Using a murine model of liver metastasis, our previous work has shown that intravascular B16F1 melanoma cells are trapped within the sinusoids by size restriction in control mice, whereas they arrest in the TPV region in mice that have been pretreated with IL-1{alpha}. Even so, early metastases developed in the portal tract areas in both control and IL-1{alpha}-prestimulated groups (7) . This selective growth of liver metastases in acinar zone 1 has also been demonstrated in rats and mice by others (8) . Early development of metastases has not been observed in the sinusoidal region (7 , 8) , suggesting that the sinusoids constitute a cytotoxic zone to cancer cells. Because microvascular NO can be toxic to cancer cells (9, 10, 11) and reduces their adhesion to post-capillary venules (12) , we have tested the hypothesis that the hepatic microvasculature regulates the arrest and fate of metastasizing cancer cells in vivo through release of NO. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that NO is released from the liver after arrest of tumor cells and that NO has a direct effect on sinusoidal killing of cancer cells and their metastatic outcome. The present study provides further evidence to support the development of metastases in the portal tract areas, with sinusoids being a more cytotoxic zone to tumor cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals and Materials
Female C57BL/6 mice weighing 20–22 grams were purchased from Charles River (Montreal, Quebec, Canada) and housed according to the University of Manitoba guidelines. The murine B16F1 melanoma cell line was obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Fluoresbrite carboxylate YG 0.05-µm microspheres were purchased from Polysciences, Inc. (Warrington, PA). {alpha}-MEM, Opti-MEM, penicillin/streptomycin, and trypsin-EDTA were purchased from Life Technologies, Inc. (Burlington, Ontario, Canada). Avertin (2,2,2-tribromoethanol) was from Caledon Laboratories Ltd. (Georgetown, Ontario, Canada). DETC was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Canada Ltd. (Oakville, Ontario, Canada). L-NAME, D-NAME, and SNAP were purchased from Sigma. The ApopTag Peroxidase Kit was from Intergen Company (Purchase, NY). Fluorescent polystyrene microspheres (15 µm in diameter) were kindly provided by Dr. D. Goetz (University of Ohio).

Experimental Design
In Vivo Experiments.
Fluorescent microsphere-labeled B16F1 melanoma cells were injected into the mesenteric veins of C57BL/6 mice, and the livers were removed between 0 and 24 h after injection. Data for each observation were obtained from three separate animals. In accordance with principles for the ethical use of animals, we used the smallest number required to obtain statistically meaningful data. Because data from three mice generally showed a clear statistical distribution, no more animals were added for most groups. Each liver sample was divided for the measurement of NO production, cell localization, and tumor cell apoptosis. For metastasis studies, unlabeled B16F1 cells were injected, and the livers were collected between days 3 and 7 (animal survival time) for surface metastatic nodule and histomorphometric analysis. A total of 83 mice (3–10 mice/condition) were used in the study.

In Vitro Experiments.
In vitro cultured B16F1 melanoma cells were exposed to NO donor SNAP, and apoptosis was measured. All analyses were performed blindly.


    Cell Culture and Fluorescent Labeling
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
B16F1 cells were cultured in {alpha}-MEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% penicillin/streptomycin in a T75 culture flask (Corning) to 80% confluence at 37°C and 5% CO2. The culture medium was then aspirated. Opti-MEM serum-reduced medium and fluoresbrite carboxylate microspheres were added to the flask in a ratio of 150 µl of microspheres:7.5 ml of Opti-MEM (microsphere stock, 2.5% solids-latex). The flask was gently mixed and put back in the incubator for 2.5 h to label the cells with occasional rocking of the flask. At the end of the labeling, the supernatant was removed. The cells were rinsed three times with Opti-MEM to wash off the unincorporated beads and left in {alpha}-MEM culture overnight to reduce cell aggregation on detaching. The labeled cells were detached on the following day with trypsin-EDTA-PBS (2:3 dilution) at 37°C for 5 min with frequent rocking of the flask. The cell suspension was transferred into a centrifuge tube with an additional 5 ml of culture medium to stop the trypsin reaction and centrifuged at 170 x g at room temperature for 3 min in a bench top centrifuge. The cell pellet was resuspended in saline and kept on ice before injection. The injecting cell viability measured by trypan blue was 95.0 ± 3.1% (SD) in the study.


    B16F1 Injection
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Surgery was performed under aseptic conditions between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. Instruments were soaked in 70% ethanol before the operation. The mouse was not stimulated by any cytokines or bacterial endotoxin before cell injection. The mouse was anesthetized with Avertin (30 mg/ml; 0.2–0.3 ml/mouse, i.p). The abdomen was cleaned with 70% ethanol and opened through a small midline incision (~10 mm). The intestine was gently pulled out to expose the mesenteric blood vessels. One branch of the superior mesenteric vein was isolated by separating the connective tissue around the vein, using forceps. A fluorescence-labeled cell suspension of 5 x 105 B16F1 melanoma cells in a volume of 150 µl in saline was injected into the isolated mesenteric vein over a 5–10-min period using a 30 G1/2 needle and a 1-ml syringe. A small piece of Gelfoam Sterile Sponge (12–7 mm; Upjohn) was used to stop the bleeding at the end of the injection. The incision was sutured by muscle and skin two layers using synthetic absorbable sutures (3–0 Vicryl; Ethicon, Johnson & Johnson, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada). The mouse was allowed to recover with a plastic catheter inserted in the mouth to facilitate breathing. The liver was collected under anesthesia at specific times (0–24 h) after injection. Samples with macroscopic infarction were excluded, and no microscopic infarction was found in the samples analyzed. For 0 h samples, the liver tissue was removed immediately at the end of the injection (within 30 s to 1 min) without suturing the abdomen. A group of mice received injection of 15 µm of fluorescent microspheres (5 x 105 beads/150 µl of saline) following the same procedure, and liver samples were removed immediately after injection (0 h).


    L-NAME Administration
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The competitive NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME was administered in the doses and routes shown in Table 1Citation , to inhibit NO production and test its effects on cell arrest, apoptosis, and metastasis formation. The inactive enantiomer of L-NAME, D-NAME, was administered by regimens A and D as described for L-NAME (see "Results").


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 Regimens for L-NAME administration

 

    EPR Measurement of NO Production
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The method of Doi et al. (13) was modified. The NO-trapping agents DETC (400 mg/kg-1 in saline, administered i.p.) and FeSO4/sodium citrate (trisodium salt; formula weight 294.1) (40 mg/kg-1 200 mg/kg-1 mixed in water; administered s.c. on the back) were given to each mouse 30 min before obtaining the liver sample. The mouse was anesthetized 10 min before sacrifice. The abdomen was opened, and constant portions of the left lateral, medial left and right, and right lateral lobes were removed quickly (between 30 s and 1 min) and placed onto a Petri dish precooled on ice. The mouse was sacrificed by opening the diaphragm and heart. The liver was sliced quickly into smaller pieces, placed into a precooled 1-ml syringe, and transferred into a suprasil synthetic quartz tube (2.4 mm, inner diameter; Heraeus Amersil, Atlanta, GA) by pushing the tissue through an 18-gauge needle from the syringe. An aliquot of liver weighing 0.27 ± 0.04 gram/mouse was transferred into each quartz tube (filled to 6 cm in height per tube), which was then immediately placed into liquid nitrogen until NO was measured by EPR spectroscopy. The remaining liver tissue was removed from the mouse and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde (BDH Laboratory Supplies, Poole, United Kingdom) for 24–48 h at 4°C. To assay the production of NO in cultured cells (control), fluorescent bead-labeled B16F1 cells (5 x 105 cells/150 µl of saline) were supplemented with DETC and FeSO4/sodium citrate at a final dilution of 1/15 (to approximate the final in vivo concentration), transferred into a quartz tube, and stored in liquid nitrogen before measurement.

EPR measurement of the trapped NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex was carried out at 115 K (-158°C; temperature controller Model ER-4111; Bruker Instruments). The spectra were measured with a Varian Associates Model E-12 EPR spectrometer operating at 9.025 GHz with 100 KHz modulation that was interfaced with a Nicolet Instruments Model 1180 computer and Model 2090 digital oscilloscope. The instrument settings were as follows: (a) microwave power, 5 mW; (b) modulation amplitude, 5 G; and (c) scan range, 505 or 1000 G. The concentration of the NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex in each sample was assumed to be proportional to the signal amplitude (peak-to-peak) of the triplet-hyperfine structure (hyperfine splitting of 13 G) observed at g = 2.04 and expressed as relative EPR signal intensity (arbitrary units) after subtracting the Cu2+-(DETC)2 complex signal observed in all samples (14 , 15) .


    Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
For 0 h samples, 15-µm frozen sections from constant sites at three different planes in the left lateral and medial and right lateral lobes per liver were cut using a freezing microtome (American Optical Company, Buffalo, NY). Ten microscopic fields (x100 magnification) with the highest cell numbers were counted from each lobe to determine the number of fluorescence-labeled B16F1 cells in both the TPV and sinusoidal regions. Data were expressed as the sum of the three mean values to increase the area of sampling. Each mean was determined by counting 10 fields in each lobe. The percentage of cells per region (sinusoids or TPV) was calculated by the following formula: total cell number (sum of three means) per region/total cell number in both regions (sum of six means) x 100.


    Assessment of in Vivo B16F1 Cytotoxicity by Double Labeling
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Frozen sections (17 µm) were obtained from random sampling sites in the same livers described above. In situ DNA end labeling (TUNEL assay; ApopTag S7100 Kit) using a digoxigenin-peroxidase detection system was performed on these sections, which contained injected fluorescent microsphere-labeled melanoma cells. To achieve optimal double labeling with fluorescent microspheres and TUNEL assay, the procedures were performed according to the manufacturer’s instructions with the following modifications: (a) for frozen tissue sections, proteinase K digestion (20 µg/ml), which was carried out at room temperature for 15 min followed by two washes with double-distilled H2O, was performed before permeabilizing the cells with ethanol/acetic acid (2:1, v/v) to facilitate the unmasking of fragmented DNA in apoptotic tumor cells; (b) TdT incubation was performed overnight in a humidified chamber at 37°C with a subsequent 1-h incubation with antidigoxigenin peroxidase conjugate at room temperature in a humidified chamber and a 12-min peroxidase substrate color development; (c). the "counter stain specimen" and "mount specimen" steps were omitted to prevent the quenching of fluorescence in the microspheres by organic solvents; (d) the slides were mounted with Gel/Mount (Biomeda Corp., Foster City, CA); and (e) to double label fluorescent microsphere-labeled B16F1 cells in culture, the cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, with a 2-h TdT incubation and a 1-h antidigoxigenin peroxidase incubation to optimize double labeling.

The total number of both single-fluorescent and doubly-labeled cells (fluorescent-ApopTag DNA end labeling) and their locations on all sections per sample were scored using a microscope with dual fluorescent and incandescent illumination. To achieve a constant sampling area, we quantified all tumor cells located in 5 fields/section, 10 sections/sample, under x100 magnification. The percentage of in situ DNA end-labeled melanoma cells in the TPV or sinusoidal region was calculated by the following formula: in situ DNA end-labeled tumor cells/region (%) = 100 x [number of double-labeled cells]/[total number of cells (double labeled + single labeled cells) in the region].


    Assessment of in Vitro B16F1 Cytotoxicity by NO Donor-derived NO
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Determination Using Fluorescence TUNEL Assay Dual Label and DNA Fragmentation.
Cultured B16F1 melanoma cells were exposed for 5 min to the NO donor SNAP. Melanoma cells were grown to 70–80% confluence in 25-cm2 flasks, labeled with fluorescent microspheres, and cultured overnight as described previously. Stock SNAP (100 mM in methanol) was incubated at 37°C for 10 min to initiate NO release and then added to the flask at a final concentration of 2.5 mM. The flask was incubated for 5 min, and the medium was removed. The monolayer of cells was washed twice with culture medium. Fresh complete culture medium was added to the flask, which was then put back into the 37°C incubator for 4, 8, or 24 h. Each flask was set up for one time point and handled individually to ensure the 5-min exposure time was fulfilled. The labeled cells without SNAP exposure (controls) were cultured for the same time at 4, 8, and 24 h thereafter. The cells were then detached with trypsin-EDTA and centrifuged at 170 x g for 3 min. The cell pellet was resuspended in saline. To assess apoptosis induced by a short exposure to SNAP, part of the cells were fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde for DNA end labeling, and the remaining cells were used for the DNA fragmentation assay. DNA end labeling was performed with 2 h of TdT incubation and 1 h of antidigoxigenin peroxidase incubation. DNA fragmentation was assessed using a Suicide Track DNA Ladder Isolation Kit (Cedarlane Laboratories Ltd., Hornby, Ontario, Canada).

Determination by Flow Cytometry Using Annexin V Plasma Membrane Labeling (Phosphatidylserine Binding by Annexin V-FITC in the Early Stage of Apoptotic Cells).
Unlabeled B16F1 cells were seeded into 6-well culture plates (Costar) at 1 x 105 cells/well (9.6 cm2). Cells were exposed to SNAP for 5 min at the same concentrations and by same procedures as described above. The cells were cultured for 24 h thereafter in the complete culture medium without SNAP. The cells were then detached using trypsin-EDTA, pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with cold PBS, and stained with annexin V-FITC and PI (50 µg/ml; annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit I; PharMingen, San Diego, CA). Cells cultured for the same period of time without SNAP treatment were set up as internal controls for the background of early and late apoptosis, necrosis, and membrane damage during trypsinization (16) . The seeding cell viability was 99 ± 1% by trypan blue exclusion. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on an EPICS ALTRA cell sorter (Beckman Coulter Inc., Miami, FL) with argon ion laser excitation at 488 nm (150 mW). Forward versus side scatter histograms were acquired to identify and set bit map gates for single intact cells. These gates were sufficiently wide to include both unaltered and apoptotic cells. The fluorescence signals derived from each cell were directed to the appropriate photomultiplier detectors by using 550 and 640 nm long-pass dichroic mirrors, with the FITC and PI fluorescence detected through the 525 and 610 nm bandpass filters, respectively. Bivariate histograms (log-log) relating annexin-FITC and PI fluorescence were based on 5000 cells that satisfied the light scatter gates. Color compensation was adjusted using cell samples stained with annexin-FITC alone or PI alone. Data were acquired in listmode format and subsequently analyzed using the EXPO 2 system software (Build 320) supplied with the instrument.


    Metastasis Studies
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Unlabeled B16F1 cells (5 x 105 cells/150 µl of saline) were injected into a mesenteric vein of the mouse and allowed to grow in vivo for 3–7 days by suturing the abdomen of the mouse and allowing it to recover in a warm environment. If any animal in an experimental group failed to survive, all other mice in the same group were sacrificed at the same time. Postsurgical care was given according to the guidelines of the Central Animal Care Services at the University of Manitoba. The mouse was sacrificed under anesthesia at the sampling time, and the liver was fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. Surface metastatic nodules >= 0.5 mm on all liver lobes were counted using a dissecting microscope (Olympus, Japan; x10). All animal surgical procedures were approved by the Bannatyne Campus Protocol Management and Review Committee at the University of Manitoba. Histomorphometric analysis was performed on histological sections from the left lateral, medial, and right lateral lobes of the same livers using a Merz Graticule to quantify the percentage of tissue area occupied by the metastases and the proportion of the tumor that was located on the liver surface (7) .


    Statistical Analysis
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Data from early-stage studies were analyzed using one-way and multiway ANOVA with repeated measures, followed by planned comparisons for pairwise comparisons. Unpaired t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for metastasis studies.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
NO Induction after B16F1 Injection.
Immediately after the injection of fluorescent microsphere-labeled B16F1 cells into the portal circulation, there was a burst of hepatic NO production. This was identified by using EPR spectroscopy to detect trapped NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex in the liver (Fig. 1A)Citation . This initial peak was not detected >5 min after injection, in the livers of untreated animals, or in sham controls injected with saline. The peak level of NO in the livers of animals injected with B16F1 cells was estimated to be in the range of 50–100 nmol/gram of wet tissue. This was determined by using an in vitro standard with a well-calibrated concentration of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 measured by double integration of the EPR spectrum obtained from a short 10–15-min hydrolysis of the NO donor SNAP under conditions identical to those used for analysis of the in vivo samples. The actual NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 concentration was calibrated relative to the double integration of the EPR spectrum of a standard nitroxide at known concentration under identical EPR operating conditions (115 K). The initial and extremely transient production of NO was followed by a slow and much lower rise of NO levels between 8 and 24 h after injection (Fig. 1A)Citation . Rapid and significant production of NO (264 ± 76 relative EPR signal intensity; n = 4; P < 0.01) was also detected in mice injected with 5 x 105 fluorescent microspheres (15 µm) with a diameter similar to that of B16F1 cells (16 µm) (7) . In these animals, the peak NO level was significantly lower than that induced by B16F1 cell injection (P < 0.001). The labeling of B16F1 cells with fluorescent beads was not associated with any significant NO production by these cells (12 ± 2 relative EPR signal intensity; n = 3 separate cultures; EPR conditions were the same as those used to evaluate the liver tissue samples). Representative EPR spectra for NO detection under various conditions are shown in Fig. 1BCitation .



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. A, EPR spectroscopic measurement of NO induction in the liver. Five x 105 B16F1 melanoma cells in 150 µl of saline were injected into the portal circulation via a mesenteric vein. The mice were given NO-trapping agents 30 min before sacrifice. The relative EPR signal intensity of each NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex was expressed in arbitrary units, which were calculated by measuring the distance from the peak to the trough of the triplet-hyperfine structure at the g = 2.04 location after subtraction of the Cu2+-(DETC)2 signal. NL, normal livers without injection of cells. Saline, saline injection only. n = 3 mice/point. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE. ***, P < 0.001. **, P < 0.01. B, representative complete EPR spectra of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex (triplet-hyperfine structure at g = 2.04) measured immediately after injection of various agents [Cu2+-(DETC)2 signal was not subtracted]. L-NAME = 2 doses of 2.5 mg/kg, given by intramesenteric injection 10 min before cell injection and simultaneously with the cells. The 505 G scan range is displayed for each spectrum.

 
Arrest and Killing of Injected B16F1 Cells.
Immediately after injection, 65 ± 1% of cells were found in the sinusoids, and 35 ± 1% of cells were found in the large TPVs (Fig. 2)Citation . Subsequently, from 4–24 h, cells in both locations became susceptible to DNA end labeling. However, after 4 h, a significantly greater percentage of melanoma cells in the sinusoids were DNA end labeled as compared with those in the TPVs (Table 2Citation and Fig. 3Citation ). The location of the neoplastic cells in the sinusoids or TPVs was clearly distinguishable. Deformation of some B16F1 cells was observed in samples taken immediately after injection, and membrane disruption was observed at 4 h and thereafter (data not shown). Small fluorescent fragments or individual microspheres were not counted.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Location of B16F1 cells in the liver immediately after injection. Fluorescent microsphere-labeled B16F1 cells (5 x 105 cells in 150 µl of saline) were injected into the mesenteric vein of the mouse. The liver was removed immediately thereafter, and 15-µm frozen sections were cut. Arrows indicate melanoma cells that are located in the sinusoids (S) and TPVs. Fluorescence microscopy; x100; FITC UV-2A filter.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2 Apoptotic cell counts in the liver after melanoma cell injection

Absolute counts of cells from which data in Fig. 3ACitation were calculated. Numbers represent the median and range of the three animals per group. Total = apoptotic + nonapoptotic cells/region.

 


View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. A, fluorescence/DNA end labeling of melanoma cells in the mouse liver. Random sections of frozen liver, 17-µm thick, were cut from the same livers used in Fig. 1Citation A and stained with the ApopTag TUNEL assay. The total number of single-labeled (fluorescence only) and double-labeled (fluorescence/ApopTag) cells and their locations were scored on all sections using dual illumination with incandescent and fluorescent light (FITC UV-2A filter). The percentages of double-labeled cells in the TPVs and sinusoids were calculated. The data are expressed as the mean ± SE of the three liver samples per time point per treatment group. S, sinusoids. B16 sinusoids versus TPVs: 4 h, P < 0.01; 8 h, P < 0.05; and 24 h, P < 0.001. B16 TPV (4 h) versus (0 h), P < 0.01. B16 + L-NAME sinusoids versus B16 sinusoids: 4 h, P = 0.055; 8 h, P < 0.05; 24 h, P < 0.01. B16 + L-NAME TPV versus B16 TPV: P > 0.05 for all points. {square}, B16, sinusoids; {circ}, B16, TPV; {blacksquare}, B16 + L-NAME, sinusoids; •, B16 + L-NAME, TPV; n = 3 mice/point; {diamondsuit}, B16 + DN, sinusoids (n = 2); {diamond}, B16 + DN, TPV. Absolute cell numbers are shown in Table 2Citation . B, fluorescence/ApopTag double labeling showing DNA end-labeled (large arrow) and nonlabeled melanoma cells (small arrow) in the sinusoids 4 h after injection.

 
The NO synthase inhibitor L-NAME was given to mice receiving B16F1 injections to determine whether the DNA end labeling effects could be related to the production of NO. The initial peak of NO production was completely inhibited by L-NAME, which was administered according to three different dose regimens (n = 3 mice/point): (a) regimen A (10 ± 0 relative EPR signal intensity); (b) regime B (42 ± 17 relative EPR signal intensity; Fig. 1BCitation ); and (c) regimen C (18 ± 3 relative EPR signal intensity). Regimens A and D also eliminated the later rise of NO at 8 and 24 h (data not shown). The effect of regimens B and C was not determined in the 8 and 24 h samples. After L-NAME administration, the percentage of DNA end-labeled B16F1 cells in the sinusoids decreased to the same level as that seen in the TPVs (Fig. 3A)Citation . L-NAME did not alter the proportion of DNA end-labeled cells in the TPV region (Fig. 3A)Citation . The inactive isomer, D-NAME, did not affect the NO burst at 0 h after cell injection (data not shown) or the proportion of apoptotic cells compared with these phenomena in animals receiving tumor cell injection alone (Fig. 3A)Citation . Under all experimental conditions, two-thirds of the cells (median, 66%; range, 65–78%) arrested in the sinusoids, and one-third of the cells (median, 34%; range, 22–35%) arrested in the TPVs.

In Vitro Cytotoxicity of NO on B16F1 Cells.
The cytotoxic effect of NO on B16F1 melanoma cells that we observed in vivo was also demonstrated in vitro using NO derived from the NO donor SNAP. A 5-min exposure of cultured B16F1 cells to 2.5 mM SNAP, which represented the transient exposure of injected B16F1 cells to NO in the liver, increased DNA end labeling at later time points with a profile (Fig. 4, A and B)Citation similar to that observed in vivo (Fig. 3, A and B)Citation . Five-min exposures to 5 and 10 mM SNAP induced an increase of DNA end labeling at 8 h in a dose-dependent manner (data not shown). The in vitro double labeling of apoptotic B16F1 cells at 8 h after a 5-min exposure to 5 mM SNAP is demonstrated in Fig. 4BCitation . A typical apoptotic DNA ladder pattern was not observed in 2.5 mM SNAP-treated cells at 8 or 24 h after 5-min SNAP exposure, presumably due to the low percentage of DNA end-labeled cells in the samples (1.9–7.8%; Fig. 4ACitation ). However, DNA ladders were generated with a longer exposure to SNAP (24 h; Fig. 4CCitation ). Flow cytometry analysis showed a >20% increase of cell frequencies in the early apoptosis region (Fig. 5CCitation , A4), and in the late apoptosis and dead cell region (Fig. 5CCitation , A2) after a 5-min exposure of cultured B16F1 cells to 2.5 mM SNAP in comparison with the untreated control (Fig. 5B)Citation . The data further support the hypothesis that a short exposure to NO could trigger apoptotic cell death at a later time. Compared with the 5-min treatment, a 24-h continuous exposure to SNAP only increased cell frequency in the late apoptosis and dead cell region (Fig. 5D, A2) without a further increase in the early apoptosis region (Fig. 5D, A4).



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Cytotoxicity of NO to cultured B16F1 cells in vitro. A, DNA end labeling induced by a 5-min exposure of cultured B16F1 cells to SNAP. SNAP (2.5 mM) was added to individual flasks containing fluorescence-labeled cells and incubated for 5 min at 37°C. The supernatant was removed, the monolayer was rinsed twice with culture medium, and cells were incubated in complete culture medium for the time indicated. Control cells were labeled with fluorescent microspheres and cultured for the same time without SNAP treatment. Cells were harvested using trypsin-EDTA, fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde, and stained with the ApopTag kit. Five microscopic fields (x100 magnification) per sample were analyzed for the percentage of double-labeled cells. Data were expressed as the mean ± SE of five fields per sample. One flask = one time point. **, P < 0.01 [SNAP (24 h) versus control (24 h); SNAP (24 h) versus SNAP (4 h)]. B, double labeling of apoptotic B16F1 cells (arrow) induced by a 5-min exposure to SNAP (5 mM) and culture in complete medium for 8 h (dual illumination with fluorescent and incandescent light; FITC UV-2A filter; x 400). C, DNA fragmentation of cells treated continuously with SNAP. B16F1 cells at 80% confluence were treated with 500 µM SNAP (Lane b) and 2 mM SNAP (Lane c) for 24 h. Cells were pelleted by centrifugation. DNA was extracted using the Suicide Track DNA Ladder Isolation Kit and electrophoresed on a 1.5% agarose gel. A total of 10 µg DNA/lane was loaded. Lane a, 100-bp DNA marker.

 


View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Histograms of flow cytometry analysis in the control and SNAP-treated B16F1 cultures. B16F1 cells (1 x 105 cells/well) were seeded (6-well plates) and cultured for 5 min (with a subsequent 24-h culture in complete medium) or 24 h in the presence of 2.5 mM SNAP. The cells were detached with trypsin-EDTA and stained with annexin V-FITC and PI according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A3 region, vital cells (annexin V-/PI-); A4 region, early apoptotic cells (annexin V+/PI-); A2 region, late apoptotic and dead cells (annexin V+/PI+); A1 region, damaged cells and cell debris (annexin V-/PI+). FALS, forward angle light scatter. SS, side scatter. Data from one of two experiments are shown.

 
Metastasis Studies.
Mice injected with B16F1 plus L-NAME (regimen D) had a 5-fold increase in the number of liver surface metastatic nodules in comparison with the group receiving B16F1 cells alone. Histomorphometric analysis on sections from three different lobes showed a ~20-fold larger histological area occupied by metastases in B16 + L-NAME groups than in the B16 only controls. A total of 90 ± 6% of the nodules from both groups were found on the liver surface. On histological examination, all small tumors that might not be scored under the dissecting microscope appeared to originate from TPVs, as described previously (7) . The results are shown in Table 3Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3 Effects of L-NAME on the formation of metastases by B16F1 cells

Unlabeled B16F1 (1 x 105 cells in 150 µl of saline) were injected into the mesenteric vein of the mouse without (controls) or with L-NAME (2.5 mg/kg L-NAME was coinjected with the cells, and 5 mg/kg L-NAME was injected i.p. 20 h after injection). The mice were killed between 3 and 7 days after injection. The metastatic nodules (>=0.5 mm in diameter) on the surfaces of all lobes of the liver were counted under a dissecting microscope. Histomorphometric analysis was performed as described in "Materials and Methods."

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that the hepatic microvasculature regulates the arrest and fate of metastasizing cancer cells through the release of NO.

NO is a small diatomic free radical, but it plays complex roles in diverse biological processes in organisms ranging from bacteria to mammals (17) . The main difficulty in measuring NO production is caused by its extremely labile nature and short half-life, which is in the millisecond range. Among the indirect NO detection methods widely accepted in the literature (18, 19, 20) , we chose to use spin trapping of a NO adduct in vivo and then measure the trapped NO signal ex vivo by EPR spectroscopy. The main advantages of spin trapping are that NO has a high affinity for the iron complex in the spin trapping agent and can instantaneously form a much more stable NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex in vivo at the site of NO release and that the trapped NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex generates a typical three-line structure on the EPR spectrum that can be distinguished from other signals. This technique has been shown to be a reproducible and sensitive NO detection method (13, 14, 15 , 21) . We argue that it is the sensitivity and specificity of the EPR spin trapping method that helped us to capture the transient burst of NO release in the liver after the melanoma cell injection. We further quantified the NO peak concentration to be in the range of 50–100 nmol/gram of wet tissue using a well-calibrated in vitro standard. In addition to the three-line structure of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex on the EPR spectrum, a quartet hyperfine spectrum of Cu2+-(DETC)2 was also detected (14 , 15 , 21) , which showed a partial overlapping with the NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 spectrum. Our data were expressed as relative EPR signal intensity (equivalent to the amplitude of peak to trough of the three-line structure) with the Cu2+-(DETC)2 spectrum subtracted, so that they represent the pure NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 signal intensity. To our knowledge, this is a more specific approach because most analyses measure the EPR NO concentration on the basis of the spectrum only.

The induction of NO production immediately after B16F1 cell injection suggested that the hepatic microvasculature is capable of eliciting rapid vascular responses probably within seconds of cell entry into the liver. The inhibition of the response by L-NAME confirmed the generation of NO. Because we did not detect NO production by populations of fluorescent bead-labeled B16F1 cells, we suggest that NO was produced by the liver and to a greater proportion by the sinusoidal endothelial cells because two-thirds of the injected cells were found in the sinusoids at 0 h after injection. The injection of 15-µm fluorescent microspheres also induced a rapid NO production, but at a significantly lower level, suggesting that NO production may be both microvascular and tumor cell dependent. The basal levels of NO production detected in the normal livers and saline-injected livers reflected the NO product in the hepatic microvasculature under physiological conditions. It is possible that the later occurrence of NO production detected after 8 h of injection originated from a different cellular source [e.g., Kupffer cells or hepatocytes, (22) ], which may contribute in part to the observed sinusoidal cytotoxicity in arresting melanoma cells between 8 and 24 h after injection. The extremely transient nature of the initial NO peak is not fully understood. It may be that the induction of NO occurred only during the entry of cells into the liver (5–10 min), that NO was quickly released into the sinusoids, and that the Fe2+-(DETC)2-trapped NO was flushed out of the liver by the blood circulation [4.3 ± 1.9 pl/s in the livers of nude mice, (23) ]. These possibilities would be consistent with an intravascular event. Metabolism of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex could be another reason for the transient nature of the peak, although little information is available on the in vivo metabolism of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 complex (24) . The observation that arrest of inert microbeads elicited a NO burst similar to that associated with cell arrest suggests that mechanical forces may initiate transient NO production. Because the quantity of NO released was greater after cell injection, other tumor cell-regulated pathways may also be involved.

A significantly greater proportion of melanoma cells underwent apoptosis in the sinusoids than in the TPVs. The observation that L-NAME treatment inhibited the initial NO burst and also inhibited the magnitude of DNA end labeling of the B16F1 cells in the sinusoid suggests that apoptosis of the melanoma cells in this region is NO dependent. Because L-NAME did not affect apoptosis in the TPVs, a separate mechanism may be involved in this zone. It has been well recognized and documented that there is a functional and structural heterogeneity of the hepatic endothelial, parenchymal, and sinusoidal lining cells and extracellular matrix in the space of Disse across different zones of the liver acinus (25) . The endothelial layer has different cellular components in the TPVs (endothelial cells) and sinusoids [endothelial cells and Kupffer cells (26) ]. We have previously shown that the expression of various adhesion molecules on the endothelium of the liver microvasculature is inducible (25) and that this can alter the site of arrest of tumor cells that enter the microvasculature (7) . The present study suggests that the cytotoxic properties of the liver may also have a zonal distribution. This is supported by our previous evidence that cells that arrest in the TPVs are more likely to form metastases than cells in the sinusoids (7) . The effects of NO do not appear to be related to an altered distribution of the tumor cells, although the NO effect does appear to be site specific. The cell arrest data (65 ± 1% in sinusoids and 35 ± 1% in TPV) fit well with our previous work, which showed melanoma cells arrested primarily in the presinusoidal portal veins in IL-1{alpha}-stimulated animals and arrested primarily in the sinusoids in unstimulated animals (7) .

The data suggest that NO is an effector of tumor cell destruction in the sinusoids. The cytotoxicity-inducing effect of a brief exposure of B16F1 cells to NO was confirmed in vitro. The data do not infer an exclusive role for NO and do not exclude the possibility that other sinusoidal factors are cytotoxic. Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide anion (O), peroxynitrite (ONOO-), Pit cells, and Kupffer cells are all potentially cytotoxic to tumor cells in the sinusoids (27, 28, 29, 30) . Apoptosis of melanoma cells in the TPVs may be mediated by these other mechanisms because L-NAME had no effect on this and therefore is not NO dependent. Because some cells showed deformation and membrane disruption immediately after arrest (31) , mechanical injury may account for some of the cell death we have observed. Because it is not possible to sample the entire liver of each animal, the present study best represents the changes observed at the sample site. Our ongoing studies have suggested to us that even by using a double labeling procedure, we are still underestimating the tumor cell killing in general because of: (a) tumor cell clearance by the liver (7) ; (b) tumor cell fragmentation after mechanical arrest (31) ; and (c) clearance of the end stage apoptotic cells (32 , 33) . Therefore, measurement of ApopTag-labeled cells should be considered as only one index of cell death. Moreover, the increased liver metastases seen after administration of L-NAME support the hypothesis that NO-mediated tumor cell cytotoxicity is one determinant of metastatic outcome and reinforces the significance of the apoptotic data.

Our results are supported by the findings of Edmiston et al. (34) , who showed in vitro that unstimulated murine sinusoidal endothelial cells are selectively toxic to a population of weakly metastatic cells by the production of reactive oxygen species. These workers have recently demonstrated that normal liver fragments in culture are nontoxic to weakly metastatic colorectal cancer cell lines, and only ischemic and reoxygenated liver fragments killed those cells (5) . Our experiments provide evidence for the existence of a mechanism by which cell arrest can trigger the release of the cytotoxic free radicals, which may account for one of the potential mechanisms of metastatic inefficiency (35) . Our study and the one by Luzzi et al. (36) both support the principles of metastatic inefficiency, although different methodologies were used in each study. Our data are consistent with the observations of Rocha et al. (37) , who have demonstrated a role for endothelial cell NO in suppression of lymphoma metastasis in the liver. Other evidence also indicates that NO may be able to trigger apoptosis in rat cardiac myocytes (38 , 39) .

In the present study, we have observed that the arrest of B16F1 melanoma cells or inert 15-µm polystyrene microbeads in the hepatic blood vessels induces an immediate burst of hepatic NO, followed by delayed expression of NO after 8 h. This effect was related to the injection of a bolus of cells (5 x 105 cells in 150 µl of saline) that might be predicted to cause a major hemodynamic disturbance within the injection time (5–10 min). Others have shown that blood flow can regulate the expression of endothelial NO synthase (40) and that endothelial NO synthase can be activated by mechanical forces including shear stress, pulsatile and cyclic circumferential stretch, and isometric contraction of the endothelium (41 , 42) . Observations on humans and animals have indicated that many cancer cells gain access to the circulation during the natural history of even small cancers (1) . However, it is not known whether the arrest of individual cells in the liver during spontaneous metastasis is capable of inducing local NO production.

As an interesting molecule, NO has been shown to play opposite roles in both inhibition and stimulation of tumor growth (43, 44, 45) . Our study implies that either inhibition of local NO production or acquisition of NO resistance by the tumor cells would be conducive to successful hepatic metastasis. The latter is consistent with the findings of Ambs et al., who showed that tumor cell-associated NO production promoted cancer progression in nude mice and that this effect was tumor suppressor gene product p53-dependent (46 , 47) .

In summary, our data have identified a natural defense mechanism against cancer metastasis in the hepatic microvasculature whereby the arrest of cancer cells in the liver induces endogenous NO release, leading to sinusoidal killing of cancer cells and reduced metastasis formation.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. B. MacNeil for help in statistical analysis and discussion of the data. Dr. D. Goetz kindly provided 15-µm fluorescent polystyrene microspheres. We also thank Mrs. A. Lawless for his participation in the work of in vitro calibration of NO-Fe2+-(DETC)2 signal in vivo and M. Webber for his help in figure preparation.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Medical Research Council of Canada Grants MT-14356 (to D. M. N. and F. W. O.) and MT-14477 (to B. B. H.) and a University of Manitoba Fellowship (to H. H. W.). Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at the Department of Pathology, Room D212, 770 Bannatyne Avenue, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E OW3. Phone: (204) 789-3338; Fax: (204) 789-3931; E-mail: worr{at}cc.umanitoba.ca Back

3 The abbreviations used are: NO, nitric oxide; EPR, electron paramagnetic resonance; DETC, diethyldithiocarbamate; TdT, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase; TUNEL, TdT-mediated UTP end labeling; L-NAME, NG-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester; D-NAME, NG-nitro-D-arginine methyl ester; SNAP, S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine; TPV, terminal portal venule; PI, propidium iodide; IL, interleukin. Back

Received 1/14/00. Accepted 8/17/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Cell Culture and Fluorescent...
 B16F1 Injection
 L-NAME Administration
 EPR Measurement of NO...
 Analysis of Cell Arrest
 Assessment of in Vivo...
 Assessment of in Vitro...
 Metastasis Studies
 Statistical Analysis
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Orr, F. W., Wang, H. H., Lafrenie, R. M., Scherbarth, S., and Nance, D. M. Interactions between cancer cells and the endothelium in metastasis. J. Pathol., 190: 310–329, 2000.
  2. Jiang W. G. Cell adhesion molecules in the formation of liver metastasis. J. Hepatobiliary Pancreat. Surg., 5: 375-382, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Khatib A. M., Kontogiannea M., Fallavollita L., Jamison B., Meterissian S., Brodt P. Rapid induction of cytokine and E-selectin expression in the liver in response to metastatic tumor cells. Cancer Res., 59: 1356-1361, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Anasagasti M. J., Alvarez A., Martin J. J., Mendoza L., Vidal-Vanaclocha F. Sinusoidal endothelium release of hydrogen peroxide enhances very late antigen-4-mediated melanoma cell adherence and tumor cytotoxicity during interleukin-1 promotion of hepatic melanoma metastasis in mice. Hepatology, 25: 840-846, 1997.[Medline]
  5. Jessup J. M., Battle P., Waller H., Edmiston K. H., Stolz D. B., Watkins S. C., Locker J., Skena K. Reactive nitrogen and oxygen radicals formed during hepatic ischemia-reperfusion kill weakly metastatic colorectal cancer cells. Cancer Res., 59: 1825-1829, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Umansky V., Schirrmacher V., Rocha M. New insights into tumor-host interactions in lymphoma metastasis. J. Mol. Med., 74: 353-363, 1996.[Medline]
  7. Scherbarth S., Orr F. W. Intravital videomicroscopic evidence for regulation of metastasis by the hepatic microvasculature: effects of interleukin-1{alpha} on metastasis and the location of B16F1 melanoma cell arrest. Cancer Res., 57: 4105-4110, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Barbera-Guillem E., Alonso-Varona A., Vidal-Vanaclocha F. Selective implantation and growth in rats and mice of experimental liver metastasis in acinar zone one. Cancer Res., 49: 4003-4010, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Li L. M., Nicolson G. L., Fidler I. J. Direct in vitro lysis of metastatic tumor cells by cytokine-activated murine vascular endothelial cells. Cancer Res., 51: 245-254, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Li L. M., Kilbourn R. G., Adams J., Fidler I. J. Role of nitric oxide in lysis of tumor cells by cytokine-activated endothelial cells. Cancer Res., 51: 2531-2535, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Geng Y. J., Hellstrand K., Wennmalm A., Hansson G. K. Apoptotic death of human leukemic cells induced by vascular cells expressing nitric oxide synthase in response to {gamma}-interferon and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}. Cancer Res., 56: 866-874, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Kong L., Dunn G. D., Keefer L. K., Korthuis R. J. Nitric oxide reduces tumor cell adhesion to isolated rat postcapillary venules. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 14: 335-343, 1996.[Medline]
  13. Doi K., Akaike T., Horie H., Noguchi Y., Fujii S., Beppu T., Ogawa M., Maeda H. Excessive production of nitric oxide in rat solid tumor and its implication in rapid tumor growth. Cancer (Phila.), 77: 1598-1604, 1996.[Medline]
  14. Kubrina L. N., Caldwell W. S., Mordvintcev P. I., Malenkova I. V., Vanin A. F. EPR evidence for nitric oxide production from guanidino nitrogens of