
[Cancer Research 60, 6303-6306, November 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
The Oncogenic Potential of the High Mobility Group Box Protein Sox31
Yu Xia,
Nancy Papalopulu,
Peter K. Vogt2 and
Jian Li
Division of Oncovirology, Department of Molecular and Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California 92037 [Y. X., P. K. V., J. L.], and Wellcome/CRC Institute, Cambridge CB2 1QR, United Kingdom [N. P.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Sox proteins belong to the superfamily of high mobility group (HMG)
proteins. Sox3 is expressed predominantly in the immature
neuroepithelium. Ectopic expression of Sox3 causes oncogenic
transformation of chicken embryo fibroblasts (CEFs). The oncogenicity
of Sox3 is correlated with nuclear localization and transcriptional
regulatory activity; mutants containing deletions in the HMG box or the
transactivation domain fail to induce foci of transformation. These
observations suggest that Sox proteins can induce aberrant cell growth
and strengthen the link of HMG proteins to oncogenesis.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
Sox proteins are structurally related to Sry, a testis-determining
factor encoded by a gene on the mammalian Y chromosome. They contain a
conserved DNA binding motif known as the
HMG3
box, which defines one of the HMG superfamilies of nonhistone
chromosome proteins (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
. They are divided into seven
subgroups, AG. Members of the same subgroup share
80% amino acid
identity within the HMG box. Sox proteins recognize the heptameric DNA
sequence 5'-(A/T)(A/T) CAA (A/T)G-3' as their consensus binding site
(6
, 7) . Unlike most transcription factors, these proteins
contact DNA in the minor groove and bend DNA 7085°. They function
both as classical transcription factors and as modulators of chromatin
structure, possibly regulating access to DNA for other regulatory
proteins. Expression patterns and functional analyses suggest that Sox
proteins are involved in lens development, chondrogenesis, sex
determination, and hemopoiesis. Among the members of the Sox family,
Sox3 is most closely related to Sox1, Sox2, and Sox21, all belonging to
subgroup B. The human Sox3 gene maps to the region Xq2627
and is a candidate gene for X-linked mental retardation syndromes
including Borjeson-Forssman-Lehmann syndrome and centronuclear
myotubular myopathy (8
, 9)
. Sox3 is highly expressed in
the developing central nervous system. In the developing chicken
embryo, transcripts of Sox3 (cSox3) are first detected in the neural
plate shortly before neural tube closure. Sox3 expression decreases as
development proceeds, correlating with the switch from proliferating to
differentiating cells (10)
. Sox3 can be phosphorylated by
Cdc2 in vitro; whether this phosphorylation regulates Sox3
function is not known (11)
. Sox3 was also identified as a
potential target of Xenopus brain factor 1, a homologue of
the retroviral oncoprotein Qin (12)
. In the course of
characterizing Qin targets, we evaluated the function of Sox3 in CEFs.
The experiments described in this report show that overexpression of
Sox3 induces oncogenic transformation of CEFs in culture. The
transforming potential of Sox3 requires both the DNA binding domain and
the transcriptional regulatory domain of the protein.
 |
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
Construction of Sox3 Expression Plasmids.
Chicken sox3 cDNA (sequence accession number AB011803, a
gift from Dafe Uwanogho, Guys Hospital, London, England) was inserted
into the retroviral expression vector RCAS (13)
and used
in stable transfections. The following PCR primers were designed and
synthesized for construction of the RCAS-Sox3 plasmids (Fig. 4A)
: Sox3-1, 5'-AGC GGG TGC CGG GTC GGA CCA GAC CTT GCT GAA
GAA GGA C-3'; Sox3-2, 5'-AGC TCG AAG CTT ATA TGT GAG TTA GTG GTA CAG
TGC-3', Sox3-3, 5'-GTA CGC GGA TCC GCC ATG TAT CCT TAC GAT GTA CCA GAC
TAT GCG TAC AGC ATG CTG GAG ACC-3'; and Sox3-4, 5'-CTG GTC CGA CCC GGC
ACC CG-3'. In the primer Sox3-3, an influenza virus hemagglutinin tag
sequence YDYDVPDYA was inserted after the ATG start codon to facilitate
immunological detection. pBSFI-Sox3 was generated from a PCR fragment
that was obtained with primers Sox3-3 and Sox3-2, digested with
BamHI and HindIII, followed by cloning into the
pBSFI adapter vector (14)
. For the construction of
pBSFI-Sox3-
HMG, two PCR reactions were carried out. One product was
amplified with primers Sox3-3 and Sox3-4; the other was generated with
Sox3-1 and Sox3-2 primers. These two PCR fragments were cleaved, either
with BamHI and BanI or with BanI and
HindIII, and then ligated and cloned into the pBSFI vector.
pBSFI-Sox3-
C was obtained by digesting the pBSFI-Sox3 plasmid with
PstI, followed by self-ligation. All PCR-amplified fragments
were confirmed by sequence analysis. The inserts from the adapter
plasmids were subsequently excised by using SfiI
endonuclease and cloned into the replication competent avian retrovirus
vector RCAS (13)
. The RCAS-v-Qin construct has been
described (12)
.
For tests of transcriptional regulation in transient transfections,
chicken sox3 sequences were inserted in-frame into the pGal0
plasmid, which contains the yeast Gal4 DNA binding domain. A PCR
product was generated from pBSFI-Sox3 representing full-length Sox3; it
was then cleaved with EcoRI and ClaI and cloned
into pGal0 to produce pGal0-Sox3; Gal4 constructs of the Sox3 HMG and
COOH-terminal domains were likewise generated from PCR products. The
reactions were performed with the following primers: HMGs, 5'-TCG AAA
GAA TTC GAC CGG GTG AAG CGC CCC ATG-3' and HMGa, 5'-AGC TCG ATC GAT TTA
CTT GGT CTT CCT CCG GGG CCG GTA-3'; Cs, 5'-TCG AAA GAA TTC CAG ATG CAC
CGC TAC GAC ATG CC-3' and Ca, 5'-AGC TCG ATC GAT TTA CTG CAG GGC CGA
AGG GTC TGT GGC-3'. The resultant PCR products were cloned in pGal0
using the same restriction enzymes as described above.
Northern and Western Blot Analyses.
Poly(A)+ RNA was isolated from chicken embryonic
brain tissues and from chicken primary fibroblasts with the RNA-STAT-60
kit (TEL-TEST, Inc., Friendswood, TX) and Oligotex mRNA kit (Qiagen,
Valencia, CA). RNA was separated by agarose formaldehyde gel
electrophoresis, blotted on nylon membranes, and hybridized to the
appropriate probes. The following probes were used. The sox3 probe was
sequence between nucleotide 1 and nucleotide 1860 of the chicken
sox3 cDNA. The qin probe comes from a viral
qin cDNA and extends from nucleotide 768 to nucleotide 1397
of that clone. The mouse actin probe (sequence accession number
gi191581) was used as a control; it has 88% nucleotide sequence
identity with chicken actin. Probes were labeled with
[
-32P]dCTP using a random primer labeling
kit (Boehringer-Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN).
Cells transfected with RCAS-Sox3 constructs were harvested after three
passages and analyzed by Western blotting. Equal amounts of cellular
extracts were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose
membranes (Schleicher & Schuell). The membranes were probed with the
monoclonal anti-HA antibody 12CA5 (Covance, Richmond, CA) at a dilution
of 1:2000 and a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated sheep antimouse serum
at a dilution of 1:3000 (Amersham, Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ).
Focus Assay.
CEFs were prepared and transfected according to the protocols described
previously (15)
. Transfected cells were overlaid with
nutrient agar consisting of 2x concentrated F10 medium (42.5%), FCS
(3%), chicken serum (1.0%), tryptose phosphate broth (9.0%), DMSO
(1.0%), penicillin/streptomycin (1.0%), and a 1.5% solution of sea
plaque agar (42.5%) the day after transfection and incubated in a
humidified incubator set at 5% CO2 and 37°C
until foci of transformed cells developed (1015 days).
Luciferase Reporter Assay.
CEFs were transfected with 250 ng of a Gal4-Sox3 construct and 100 ng
of firefly luciferase reporter plasmid using Lipofectamine according to
the manufacturers protocol (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg,
MD). Two firefly luciferase reporters CMV-Luc and Gal4-CMV-Luc were
used. Gal4-CMV-Luc contains five Gal4 DNA binding sites upstream of the
CMV promoter. Transfection efficiency was normalized by cotransfection
with 100 ng of the Renilla luciferase plasmid pRL-CMV
(Promega Corp., Madison, WI). Transfected cells were harvested at
48 h after transfection. The firefly and Renilla
luciferase activities were determined using a luminometer (Wallac Inc.,
Gaithersburg, MD) and the dual luciferase assay kit (Promega Corp.,
Madison, WI). Relative luciferase activity is the ratio of firefly to
Renilla activities.
 |
Results and Discussion
|
|---|
The chicken qin gene codes for a homologue of the
mammalian BF-1, and similar to BF-1, the Qin protein is expressed
exclusively in the telencephalon (15, 16, 17)
. The Qin/BF-1
protein belongs to the forkhead/winged helix family of transcription
factors and is required for the development of the cerebral hemispheres
(18)
. The qin gene has oncogenic potential and
occurs as a cell-derived oncogene in an avian sarcoma virus
(15)
. Injection of in vitro synthesized
qin mRNA into the posterior neural plate of
Xenopus embryos induces the expression of sox3
(12)
. This observation suggests that sox3 plays
a role in neuroepithelial cell proliferation and differentiation,
possibly as a target gene of the Qin protein. We explored the
relationship between qin and sox3 in brain
development by analyzing expression in Northern blots. As shown in Fig. 1
, both sox3 and qin mRNA are expressed in the
developing cerebral hemispheres. Expression of sox3 precedes
that of qin. On day 5 of embryonal development, only
sox3 mRNA is detectable, and from day 8 to day 20, both
messages are present. In contrast to qin, sox3 is
also expressed in the midbrain and hindbrain (data not shown). These
results show that sox3 can be expressed independently of
qin; the two genes have overlapping but not identical
expression profiles. In mRNA from RCAS- and RCAS-v-Qin-infected CEFs,
sox3 transcripts are barely detectable by Northern blot
analysis, further suggesting that qin is not sufficient to
drive sox3 expression, and additional tissue-specific
regulators are required.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. Expression of Sox3 in chicken embryonic brain tissue and
in CEFs. mRNA (1 µg/lane) was prepared from the whole brain of
embryos at day 5 (E5; Lane 1), the
cerebral hemispheres of embryos at days 8, 10, 12, and 20 (E8,
E10, E12, and E20, respectively; Lanes
25), and CEFs infected with RCAS and RCAS-v-Qin viruses
(RCAS and Qin, respectively; Lanes
6 and 7).
|
|
The expression of sox3 in proliferating neural epithelium
suggests a regulatory role in cell growth. Therefore, we examined the
possibility that ectopic expression of sox3 could induce
oncogenic transformation. Transfection of RCAS-Sox3 into CEFs led to
the appearance of transformed cell foci within 10 days. These foci
showed cellular multilayering, but they were smaller and more
distinctly demarcated than those induced by RCAS-v-Qin (Fig. 2)
. RCAS-Sox3 produced an average of 2030 foci per 50 ng of DNA. In
comparison, RCAS-v-Qin gave rise to 1015 foci per 50 ng of DNA, and
cells transfected with the RCAS vector alone did not develop
transformed cell foci. However, unlike Qin, Sox3 failed to stimulate
anchorage-independent growth. When RCAS-Sox3 transfected cells were
injected s.c. into the wing web of 1-day-old chickens (McIntyre Farms,
Lakeside, CA), two of four birds developed small tumors after a latent
period of 56 weeks, suggesting a marginal tumorigenic potential of
the Sox3 protein.
Sox3 is a candidate transcriptional regulator, but it is less efficient
than other Sox proteins in binding to potential DNA target sequences
and in transcriptional activation (5
, 19)
. Yet, in its
COOH terminal region, Sox3 retains a high degree of homology to the
transactivation domain of Sox2 and other members of the Sox protein
subgroup B that are potent transcriptional regulators (2)
.
Because of the difficulties in demonstrating transcriptional activation
by native Sox3, it was decided to test specific domains of the protein
as Gal4 fusions in transient transfections (Fig. 3A)
. The COOH terminal Sox2 homology region of Sox3 functioned
as an activator domain in these tests, whereas the Gal4 fusion of the
HMG region or the full-length Sox3 protein failed to up-regulate
transcription from the Gal4 reporter (Fig. 3B)
. These data
are compatible with the interpretation that the COOH terminal region of
Sox3 contains a transactivation domain that can be masked in the
full-length molecule. The nature of this masking is not known.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 3. A, maps of GAL4-Sox3 constructs. The DNA
binding domain (amino acids 1147) of GAL4 was fused to amino acids
2316 of Sox3 in GAL0-Sox3, to amino acids 46124 of Sox3 in
GAL0-HMG, and to amino acids 193289 of Sox 3 in GAL0-C.
B, relative luciferase activities in transient
transfection assays (n = 3);
bars, SE.
|
|
The role of DNA binding and transcriptional regulation in oncogenic
transformation by Sox3 was tested with deletion mutants of the HMG and
COOH-terminal domain, respectively. Both mutants were expressed by the
RCAS vector in stable transfection of CEFs. Western blot analysis with
monoclonal HA antibody confirmed production of the mutant proteins
(Fig. 4B)
. Immunofluorescent staining located the protein with the
COOH terminal deletion as well as full-length Sox3 in the nucleus;
these constructs contain the nuclear localization signal of the HMG
domain (20)
. Deletion of the HMG domain resulted in
cytoplasmic localization (Fig. 4C)
. In focus assays,
RCAS-Sox3-
HMG failed to transform CEFs, whereas RCAS-Sox3-
C
induced slight multilayering of cells without causing the appearance of
distinct foci of transformation (Fig. 4D)
. These results
suggest that both DNA binding and transcriptional regulation are needed
for oncogenic transformation by Sox3. However, the effect of the
deletions on oncogenic potential could also reflect conformational
changes that are unrelated to the transcriptional regulatory functions
of Sox3.
HMG proteins are a diverse group of nonhistone, chromatin-associated
proteins of small size and hence high mobility in electrophoresis. They
are grouped into three main categories: the HMG-1/HMG-2 and HMG-1 box
proteins; the HMG-I(Y) family; and the HMG-14/17 family
(4)
. These categories differ in structure, mechanism of
interaction with DNA, and function. Sox proteins belong to the first
category, together with the HMG box transcription factors TCF and LEF
(3)
.
There is increasing evidence that HMG box proteins as well as members
of the HMG(Y) family have oncogenic potential (reviewed in Refs.
21
and 22
). Expression levels of the HMGI(Y)
protein have been correlated with the degree of neoplasia and
metastatic tumor progression in cancers of the colon and prostate.
Chromosomal translocation of HMGI-C is common in benign mesenchymal
tumors. Gain of function in LEF and TCF plays an important role in
colon cancer (23)
. LEF and TCF combine with ß-catenin to
form active transcriptional regulators. ß-Catenin is controlled by a
cytoplasmic multiprotein complex that also contains the adenomatous
polyposis coli protein, glycogen synthase kinase 3ß, axin, and
conductin. Mutations in adenomatous polyposis coli or ß-catenin can
increase the stability of ß-catenin, leading to its nuclear
translocation and recruitment into transcriptional regulators
containing LEF/TCF. The growth-stimulatory action of Sox3 is
reminiscent of the role of LEF/TCF in colon cancer. A recent experiment
also suggests participation of Xenopus Sox3 in Wnt
signaling, showing a physical interaction between Sox3 and ß-catenin
(24)
. The Sox3 transformation assay in vitro
will allow a more detailed genetic analysis of Sox3 domains and their
biological functions.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We are grateful to D. Uwanogho, H. Xu, C. Sonderegger, and
F. J. Rauscher, III, for providing chicken Sox3, actin cDNA,
Gal4-CMV-Luc, and pGal0 plasmids.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by USPHS Grants CA42564 and CA79616
(to P. K. V.), Grant 4053 from the Council for Tobacco Research USA,
Incorporated (to J. L.), and Grant RPG-97-069-01-VM from the American
Cancer Society (to J. L.). Y. X. is a recipient of a NIH training
fellowship. This is manuscript number 12687-MEM at The Scripps Research
Institute. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Division of Oncovirology, Department of Molecular and
Experimental Medicine, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North
Torrey Pines Road, BCC239, La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (858) 784-9728;
Fax: (858) 784-2070; E-mail: pkvogt{at}scripps.edu 
3 The abbreviations used are: HMG, high mobility
group; CEF, chicken embryo fibroblast; CMV, cytomegalovirus; BF, brain
factor; TCF, T-cell factor; LEF, lymphoid enhancer factor. 
Received 4/12/00.
Accepted 10/ 3/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Pevny L. H., Lovell-Badge R. Sox genes find their feet. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 7: 338-344, 1997.[Medline]
-
Wegner M. From head to toes: the multiple facets of Sox proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 27: 1409-1420, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Laudet V., Stehelin D., Clevers H. Ancestry and diversity of the HMG box superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res., 21: 2493-2501, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Bustin M., Reeves R. High-mobility-group chromosomal proteins: architectural components that facilitate chromatin function. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 54: 35-100, 1996.[Medline]
-
Collignon J., Sockanathan S., Hacker A., Cohen-Tannoudji M., Norris D., Rastan S., Stevanovic M., Goodfellow P. N., Lovell-Badge R. A comparison of the properties of Sox-3 with Sry and two related genes, Sox-1 and Sox-2. Development (Camb.), 122: 509-520, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Harley V. R., Lovell-Badge R., Goodfellow P. N., Hextall P. J. The HMG box of SRY is a calmodulin binding domain. FEBS Lett., 391: 24-28, 1996.[Medline]
-
Mertin S., McDowall S. G., Harley V. R. The DNA-binding specificity of SOX9 and other SOX proteins. Nucleic Acids Res., 27: 1359-1364, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Stevanovic M., Lovell-Badge R., Collignon J., Goodfellow P. N. SOX3 is an X-linked gene related to SRY. Hum. Mol. Genet., 2: 2013-2018, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mumm, S., Zucchi, I., and Pilia, G. SOX3 gene maps near DXS984 in Xq27.1, within candidate regions for several X-linked disorders. Am. J. Med. Genet., 72: 376378, 1997.
-
Uwanogho D., Rex M., Cartwright E. J., Pearl G., Healy C., Scotting P. J., Sharpe P. T. Embryonic expression of the chicken Sox2, Sox3 and Sox11 genes suggests an interactive role in neuronal development. Mech. Dev., 49: 23-36, 1995.[Medline]
-
Stukenberg P. T., Lustig K. D., McGarry T. J., King R. W., Kuang J., Kirschner M. W. Systematic identification of mitotic phosphoproteins. Curr. Biol., 7: 338-348, 1997.[Medline]
-
Bourguignon C., Li J., Papalopulu N. XBF-1, a winged helix transcription factor with dual activity, has a role in positioning neurogenesis in Xenopus competent ectoderm. Development (Camb.), 125: 4889-4900, 1998.[Abstract]
-
Hughes S. H., Greenhouse J. J., Petropoulos C. J., Sutrave P. Adaptor plasmids simplify the insertion of foreign DNA into helper-independent retroviral vectors. J. Virol., 61: 3004-3012, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Aoki M., Batista O., Bellacosa A., Tsichlis P., Vogt P. K. The akt kinase: molecular determinants of oncogenicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 14950-14955, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li J., Vogt P. K. The retroviral oncogene qin belongs to the transcription factor family that includes the homeotic gene fork head. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 4490-4494, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tao W., Lai E. Telencephalon-restricted expression of BF-1, a new member of the HNF-3/fork head gene family, in the developing rat brain. Neuron, 8: 957-966, 1992.[Medline]
-
Chang H. W., Li J., Kretzschmar D., Vogt P. K. Avian cellular homolog of the qin oncogene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 447-451, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Xuan S., Baptista C. A., Balas G., Tao W., Soares V. C., Lai E. Winged helix transcription factor BF-1 is essential for the development of the cerebral hemispheres. Neuron, 14: 1141-1152, 1995.[Medline]
-
Kamachi Y., Cheah K. S., Kondoh H. Mechanism of regulatory target selection by the SOX high-mobility-group domain proteins as revealed by comparison of SOX1/2/3 and SOX9. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 107-120, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sudbeck P., Scherer G. Two independent nuclear localization signals are present in the DNA-binding high-mobility group domains of SRY and SOX9. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 27848-27852, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wunderlich V., Bottger M. High-mobility-group proteins and canceran emerging link. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 123: 133-140, 1997.[Medline]
-
Cooper C. S. Translocations in solid tumors. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 6: 71-75, 1996.[Medline]
-
Polakis P., Hart M., Rubinfeld B. Defects in the regulation of ß-catenin in colorectal cancer. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol., 470: 23-32, 1999.[Medline]
-
Zorn A. M., Barish G. D., Williams B. O., Lavender P., Klymkowsky M. W., Varmus H. E. Regulation of Wnt signaling by Sox proteins: XSox17
/ß and XSox3 physically interact with ß-catenin. Mol. Cell, 4: 487-498, 1999.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Chen, L. Shi, L. Zhang, R. Li, J. Liang, W. Yu, L. Sun, X. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, et al.
The Molecular Mechanism Governing the Oncogenic Potential of SOX2 in Breast Cancer
J. Biol. Chem.,
June 27, 2008;
283(26):
17969 - 17978.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Du, S. E. Spence, N. A. Jenkins, and N. G. Copeland
Cooperating cancer-gene identification through oncogenic-retrovirus-induced insertional mutagenesis
Blood,
October 1, 2005;
106(7):
2498 - 2505.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. S. Friedman, C. S. Bangur, E. J. Zasloff, L. Fan, T. Wang, Y. Watanabe, and M. Kalos
Molecular and Immunological Evaluation of the Transcription Factor SOX-4 as a Lung Tumor Vaccine Antigen
J. Immunol.,
March 1, 2004;
172(5):
3319 - 3327.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Kim, A. Trubetskoy, T. Suzuki, N. A. Jenkins, N. G. Copeland, and J. Lenz
Genome-Based Identification of Cancer Genes by Proviral Tagging in Mouse Retrovirus-Induced T-Cell Lymphomas
J. Virol.,
February 1, 2003;
77(3):
2056 - 2062.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Takash, J. Canizares, N. Bonneaud, F. Poulat, M.-G. Mattei, P. Jay, and P. Berta
SOX7 transcription factor: sequence, chromosomal localisation, expression, transactivation and interference with Wnt signalling
Nucleic Acids Res.,
November 1, 2001;
29(21):
4274 - 4283.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|