
[Cancer Research 60, 6730-6736, December 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
The Effect of Fibroblast Growth Factor 8, Isoform b, on the Biology of Prostate Carcinoma Cells and Their Interaction with Stromal Cells1
Zhigang Song,
William C. Powell,
Noriyuki Kasahara,
Adriaan van Bokhoven,
Gary J. Miller and
Pradip Roy-Burman2
Departments of Pathology [Z. S., W. C. P., N. K., P. R-B.], and Biochemistry and Molecular Biology [N. K., P. R-B.], University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90033, and Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262 [A. v. B., G. J. M.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Fibroblast growth factor 8, isoform b (FGF8b), has been implicated in
the oncogenesis of the prostate and mammary epithelia. We examined
whether overexpression of FGF8b in a weakly tumorigenic prostate
carcinoma cell line, LNCaP, could alter the growth and tumorigenic
properties of these cells. LNCaP cells were infected with a lentivirus
vector carrying FGF8b cDNA and the green fluorescent
protein (GFP) cDNA in the same construct, and the
infected cell population was sorted on the basis of GFP protein
expression. It was demonstrated that, in comparison with the cells
transduced with GFP-vector alone, LNCaP cells with
FGF8b-GFP expression manifested an increased growth rate, higher soft
agar clonogenic efficiency, enhanced in vitro invasion,
and increased in vivo tumorigenesis. Most strikingly,
whereas parental or vector-control LNCaP cells failed to grow at all in
an in vivo tumorigenesis/diaphragm invasion assay in
nude mice, the cells overexpressing FGF8b proliferated as deposits of
tumor cells on the diaphragm, frequently with indications of tumor cell
invasion into the diaphragm. Coculturing of primary prostatic or
non-prostatic stromal cells with the infected LNCaP cells led us to
observe that: (a) stromal cells, irrespective of tissue
origin, strongly suppressed LNCaP cell growth; (b) FGF8b
producing LNCaP cells could partially evade the stromal inhibition,
perhaps from the autocrine stimulatory effect of FGF8b; and
(c) production of FGF8b in the coculture had a
stimulatory effect on the proliferation of the stromal cells, prostatic
or non-prostatic. This stimulation was not attributable to the direct
action of FGF8b on stromal cells. Instead, it appears that
epithelial-stromal cell-cell contact and some unknown soluble factors
secreted by LNCaP cells upon stimulation of FGF8b are required for the
maximal effect. Together, these results suggest that the growth rate
and biological behavior of prostatic cancer cells can be altered to a
more aggressive phenotype by up-regulation of FGF8b expression. These
changes in phenotype also influence the interaction of the affected
cells with stromal cells. The data obtained may have direct relevance
to the progression of prostate cancer, recognizing that FGF8b is
naturally overexpressed in advanced disease.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
The
FGF3
family consists of an increasing number of structurally related
polypeptide mitogens, which elicit their effects by binding to
high-affinity tyrosine kinase receptors on the cell surface, encoded by
at least four genes (FGFR14) in mammals (1
, 2)
. FGF molecules are important in cell-cell interactions during
embryogenesis and tissue differentiation, as well as during
tumorigenesis. FGF8, the eighth member of this family, was
originally identified as the androgen-induced growth factor from the CM
of Shionogi mouse mammary carcinoma cell line, SC-3 (3)
.
It was demonstrated to mediate the androgen-dependent growth of SC-3
cells. Its expression was correlated with murine and chicken
embryogenesis in regions of outgrowth and patterning such as the
elongating body axis, midbrain/hindbrain junction, limb, and face
(4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10)
. Whereas knockout of the fgf8 gene
resulted in early embryonic lethality in mice (11)
,
FGF8 was identified by the use of the Cre/loxP system as an
epithelial signal necessary for the outgrowth and patterning of the
first branchial arch primordium (12)
. The fgf8
has been localized to mouse chromosome 19 and human FGF8 to
chromosome 10q2426 (6
, 7
, 13
, 14)
. This gene is unusual
in its first exon, which, in fact, consists of at least four exons
compared with one exon in other FGF genes. Alternative
splicing of these four exons in the mouse results in eight potential
protein isoforms that vary in their amino termini (3
, 6
, 15
, 16)
. The human FGF8 gene is similar to its murine
counterpart in structure. However, only four protein isoforms (FGF8a,
8b, 8e, and 8f) are predicted because of a blocked reading frame in the
human exon 1B (17
, 18)
. The FGF8 isoforms share the same
signal peptide and identical COOH-terminal region. NIH3T3 cells
transfected with fgf8b cDNA or treated with rFGF8b became
highly transformed compared with those transfected with
fgf8a or fgf8c (15
, 19)
.
Additionally, fgf8 was demonstrated to cooperate with the
Wnt-1 gene as a murine mammary proto-oncogene in
Wnt-1 transgenic mice (16)
.
Of the four possible isoforms, three (FGF8a,
FGF8b, and FGF8e) were cloned in our laboratory
from a human prostate tumor cell line, DU145 (20)
. The
protein products of these cDNAs share extensive amino acid homology
with mouse FGF8 isoforms in that FGF8a and
FGF8b exhibit identical amino acid sequences to those of
their murine counterparts. The human FGF8 isoforms, although
weakly expressed in human adult tissues or cell lines, are nevertheless
differentially expressed. FGF8b appears to be the primary
species in prostatic epithelial cell lines (20)
.
Consistent with previous reports, FGF8b, but not
FGF8a or FGF8e, confers robust transforming and
tumorigenic activities in NIH3T3 cells. This oncogenic activity becomes
more relevant because evidence points to a significant up-regulation of
FGF8b expression in high-grade prostate carcinomas (21
, 22) . A high frequency of FGF8 overexpression, which
is associated with decreased patient survival and persists in
androgen-independent disease, was detected by immunohistochemical
analyses of prostate cancer specimens (22)
. Furthermore,
targeted overexpression of this isoform in the mammary glands of
FGF8b transgenic mice results in mammary tumorigenesis
(23)
. In cultured human prostate cancer cells, expression
of antisense FGF8b reduces their growth rate, inhibits their soft agar
clonogenic activity, and decreases in vivo tumorigenicity
(24)
. The above findings strongly suggest that FGF8b is
involved in hormone-related carcinogenesis of the prostate and mammary
glands.
These observations have prompted us to investigate the biological
effects of overexpression of FGF8b in prostatic cancer cells. A
lentiviral transfer vector was developed for transduction of the
FGF8b gene along with a GFP marker gene into the
weakly tumorigenic LNCaP prostate carcinoma cell line. The
proliferation, anchorage-independent growth ability, and in
vitro and in vivo invasion ability of transduced LNCaP
cells were determined. To examine the epithelial-stromal interactions
under the condition of FGF8b overexpression in LNCaP cells, we used a
coculture system in which GFP expression served as a marker for the
separate quantitation of the cellular components.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Materials.
Transducing vector, packaging construct (pCMV
8.71), and VSV
env-coding plasmids were originally obtained from Dr.
Luigi Naldini (University of Torino, Torino, Italy; Ref.
25
). The transducing vector was modified to include an
IRES-GFP marker gene cassette. Primary explant cultures of
prostate and SV stromal cells were established from residual portions
of radical prostatectomy specimens or suprapubic prostatectomy
specimens after fresh pathological inspection. The tissues were freed
of connective tissue elements by sharp dissection and minced into small
pieces (approximately 1 mm3
) using crossed No. 11
scalpel blades. They were first plated in a minimal volume of DMEM
supplemented with 20% FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin and were
incubated in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2
at 37°C. After primary outgrowth, the medium was changed to RPMI 1640
supplemented with 10% FBS. When the stromal cells had reached 7080%
confluency, they were detached using 0.25% trypsin/1
mM EDTA and replated at 20% densities.
Construction of Transducing Vector and Generation of
Lentivirions.
Human FGF8b cDNA (20)
, which was flanked with
the CMV immediate early promoter at the 5' end and IRES-GFP
at the 3' end, was incorporated into the polycloning sites of the
transducing vector. Plasmids were amplified in Escherichia
coli and purified by Qiagen Maxi Prep kit. Using Superfect reagent
(Stratagene, Inc.), human 293T cells, at about 80% confluency, were
cotransfected with the transducing vector, packaging construct and VSV
env-encoding plasmids at a ratio of 5:5:1. The transducing
vector construct containing only the CMV-driven IRES-GFP
cassette, without FGF8b, was used in parallel cotransfection
to produce the control vector. The medium containing virions was
harvested daily starting from 3rd day to the 5th day after
transfection.
Infection of LNCaP Cells and Sorting by FACS.
The lentivirus-containing medium was concentrated 10-fold by using
Mr 300,000 molecular weight
cutoff spin columns (Gelman). One ml of concentrated
CMV-FGF8b-GFP or CMV-GFP vector lentiviral medium
was applied to 80%-confluency LNCaP cells in T25 culture flasks. After
4 h of incubation, lentiviral medium was removed. Cells were
washed with PBS twice and grown in complete medium for 2 days. The 8b-
and vector-LNCaP cells were released from flasks by trypsinization and
sorted by FACS on the basis of expression of GFP.
Northern Blot Analyses.
Total RNAs were extracted from 8b-, vector-, and noninfected LNCaP
cells by using RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). RNAs were separated by
electrophoresis on a 1% denaturing formaldehyde agarose gel, and
transferred to Hybond N membrane (Amersham Corp.). The blots were
hybridized to a 32P-labeled full-length FGF8b
cDNA probe and exposed to X-ray film.
NIH3T3 Cell Transformation Assay.
To produce CM for use in the transformation assay, fresh medium without
FBS plus 10 µg/ml heparan sulfate was applied to transduced LNCaP
cells when they were at 80% confluency. After 4872 h of incubation,
CM was collected and cell debris was removed by centrifugation. The CM,
diluted 1:10 in DMEM medium, was added to NIH3T3 cells when they had
grown to 70% confluency. After 2 days of incubation, cell morphology
was examined microscopically as described previously (20
, 24)
.
Soft Agar Clonogenicity Assay.
The 8b-, vector- and noninfected LNCaP cells were released by
trysinization and suspended in 0.4% Seakem agarose at a cell density
of 1 x 104/2 ml. The suspensions
were overlayed on 4 ml of 0.8% Seakem agarose in a 6-cm-diameter dish
and incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2 for 21 days.
The visible colonies were counted. The colony-forming efficiency was
calculated by dividing the number of soft agar colonies by the number
of cells plated and multiplying by 100 to convert to a percentage.
Matrigel Invasion Chamber Assay.
Inserts of 8-µm pore-sized membranes for 24-well plates were
prepared by coating with Matrigel basement membrane matrix (Becton
Dickinson Labware, Bedford, MA) following the manufacturers
instructions. Each chamber was separated into an upper and a lower
portion by the insertion of a thin layer of Matrigel basement
membrane matrix. The 8b-, vector-, or noninfected LNCaP cells were
placed on the upper chamber at a cell density of 1 x 105 cells/insert. The CM obtained by incubating
NIH3T3 cells for 24 h in serum-free DMEM in the presence of 50
µg/ml ascorbic acid was added to the lower chamber to serve as a
chemoattractant. After 24 h of incubation, the upper surface of
the inserts was wiped with cotton swabs, and the inserts were stained
with H&E. Cells that migrated through the Matrigel and the filter pores
to the lower surface were counted under a light microscope with five
random high-power fields per insert (26)
.
In Vivo Tumorigenicity and Immunohistochemistry
Studies.
The 8b-, vector-, and noninfected LNCaP cells were grown with complete
medium in log phase and released from flasks by trypsinization. One
million cells of each type were injected i.p. into athymic nude mice as
described previously (26
, 27)
. Each cell type was injected
into three animals. After 9 weeks of incubation, mice were sacrificed.
Diaphragms were fixed in 10% formalin overnight and embedded with
paraffin. Sections were incubated with a purified goat polyclonal
anti-GFP antibody (Santa Cruz) at 4 µg/ml concentration. The bound
antibody was detected with biotinylated antigoat immunoglobulin.
Sections incubated without primary antibody served as negative
controls.
Proliferation Assay of LNCaP-Stromal Coculture.
Approximately 1 x 104 8b- or
vector-LNCaP cells and 1 x 104
stromal cells were mixed and seeded into six-well plates (Corning),
whereas 1 x 104 8b-, vector-,
noninfected LNCaP cells and stromal cells alone were also plated as
controls. Each sample was seeded in triplicate. Total cell numbers of
cocultures were counted at different time points. After counting, 8b-
or vector-LNCaP cell and stromal cell cocultures were analyzed by flow
cytometry on the basis of GFP expression. The fractions of transduced
LNCaP or stromal cells were measured and multiplied by total cell
numbers to calculate the exact number for each cell type in cocultures.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Examination of Autocrine and Paracrine Mitogenic Activity of FGF8b.
Chimeric lentivirions capable of a single cycle of infection were
produced in a human embryonic kidney cell line, 293T, through
three-plasmid cotransfection (Fig. 1
; Ref. 25
). LNCaP cells, responsive to rFGF8b treatment and
only weakly tumorigenic in vivo, were infected with these
virions, which carried either the FGF8b-GFP or
only the GFP control gene. After infection and propagation,
the cells were sorted twice by FACS on the basis of their GFP
expression. Thus two types of populations, cells transduced with the
human FGF8b gene (designated as 8b-LNCaP) and cells
transduced with vector control construct (vector-LNCaP), were
established. Under a fluorescent microscope, GFP was an excellent
visible marker to determine whether the cells were indeed transduced
(Fig. 2A)
. The expression of FGF8b in 8b-LNCaP cells was
readily detected with a Northern blot assay using a
32P-labeled full-length FGF8b probe, whereas the
expression in vector- or noninfected cells was too low to detect by the
Northern technique (Fig. 2B)
. To demonstrate
FGF8b expression at the functional protein level, we
conducted an NIH3T3 cell biological transformation assay using CM from
transduced LNCaP cells. In agreement with our previous work
(20)
, CM from 8b-cells displayed a strong ability to
transform the NIH3T3 cells morphologically, whereas CM from
vector-LNCaP cells did not (data not shown).

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Detection of GFP and FGF8b expression in transduced LNCaP
cells. A, GFP was detected by fluorescence microscopy.
B, FGF8b mRNA was detected by Northern blot using a
32P-labeled FGF8b cDNA probe. Sample loading
in (B) was visualized by the 18S and 28S rRNA levels.
|
|
To avoid potential clonal variation, pooled populations of sorted
cells rather than single clones of transduced cells were used in all
experiments. First, the effect of FGF8b on growth of LNCaP cells was
examined. The experiments were repeated four times with cells at
different passages. Representative results are illustrated in Fig. 3A
. Clearly the overexpression of FGF8b in 8b-LNCaP cells
increased the growth rate in comparison with that of vector-LNCaP
cells. After 14 days of culture, the proliferation rate of 8b-LNCaP
cells was 2-fold higher than that of vector-LNCaP cells. There was no
difference in the growth rate between vector- and noninfected LNCaP
cells (data not shown). Next, we determined whether FGF8b could
function as a mitogen to stromal cells. Two different human primary
prostatic stromal cell cultures and one primary stromal cell culture
from human seminal vesicle were used to examine the effect of rFGF8b on
stromal cell growth. Cells were treated with rFGF8b at concentrations
of 10 ng/ml or 100 ng/ml. Each experiment was repeated twice. It was
found that rFGF8b had no mitogenic effect on either prostatic (Fig. 3B)
or non-prostatic stromal cells (data not shown). In
contrast, rFGF8b, consistent with a previous study (17)
,
was able to stimulate proliferation of LNCaP cells. The stimulation
noted with 10 ng/ml of the protein factor, however, could not be
further enhanced by increasing the concentration by 10-fold (Fig. 3C)
.

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 3. The effect of FGF8b on the growth of LNCaP cells and
stromal cells. A, proliferation assay of vector- or
8b-LNCaP cells; B, growth of prostatic stromal cells in
the presence or absence of rFGF8b; C, growth of LNCaP
cells treated with rFGF8b.
|
|
Determination of Effect of FGF8b on Tumorigenic Properties of LNCaP
Cells.
The soft agar assay was performed to investigate the effect of FGF8b on
the anchorage-independent clonogenicity of transduced LNCaP cells. Each
cell sample was seeded in triplicate and each assay was repeated twice.
After 21 days of culture, the 8b-LNCaP cell group displayed clonogenic
efficiency of 332 ± 45.74 colonies (3.32%), whereas a
reduced efficiency of 250 ± 36.62 colonies (2.5%) was
observed with the vector-LNCaP cell group. By Students t
test, the difference in clonogenic efficiency between these two cell
groups was determined to be significant (P < 0.05). Additionally, the size of at least one-third of the colonies
formed by 8b-LNCaP cells was generally larger than those formed by
vector- or noninfected LNCaP cells (results not shown). The latter two
cell types showed no significant difference in either clonogenic
efficiency or colony size.
Next, the in vitro invasion ability of transduced cells was
measured with the Matrigel invasion chamber assay. After 24 h of
incubation, vector- (Fig. 4A)
or 8b-LNCaP cells (Fig. 4B)
that migrated
through the Matrigel basement membrane matrix and the filter pores to
the lower surface were counted by light microscopy. From 1 x 105 seeded cells, 583 ± 37.47 8b-LNCaP cells were counted compared with 173 ± 60.70 vector-LNCaP cells (Fig. 4C)
. Although the difference
between these two cell types was significant (P = 0.001), there was no significant difference between vector- or
noninfected LNCaP cells. This assay was repeated three times with cells
at different passages, and each cell sample was done in triplicate.

View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. Stimulation of in vitro invasion by FGF8b.
H&E staining was used to detect the vector- (A) or
8b-LNCaP cells (B) that migrated through the Matrigel
basement membrane. The difference between migrated vector- and 8b-LNCaP
cells was indicated (P = 0.001;
C). Bars, SD of means of individual
experiments.
|
|
To assess the survival ability of transduced LNCaP cells in
vivo, one million 8b-, vector-, or noninfected LNCaP cells were
injected i.p. into the athymic nude mice. Five mice were inoculated
with each cell type. After 9 weeks of incubation, the mice were
sacrificed and diaphragms were fixed with 10% formalin. After paraffin
embedding, sections were stained with H&E (Fig. 5A)
. Twelve different sections for each individual diaphragm
were examined for tumor growth or tumor invasion under a microscope
(26
, 27)
. The fact that the attached cells were indeed
tumor cells was confirmed by immunohistochemistry assay using an
anti-GFP antibody (Fig. 5B)
. The immunohistochemistry assay
was repeated twice on the sections from each diaphragm. Although the
analysis involved a limited number of tissue sections, it was found
that at least four of five animals in 8b-LNCaP cell-injected mice were
positive for tumor growth, whereas all five mice in vector- or
noninfected LNCaP cell-injected mice were negative (Table 1)
. In two of these four diaphragms from 8b-LNCaP cell-injected mice,
tumor cells also exhibited multifocal attached growth on the peritoneal
surface of diaphragm. The sizes of areas that the tumor cells occupied
in these diaphragms varied considerably. In 20% of areas examined,
moreover, tumor cells did grow into the diaphragm and spread
horizontally with evidence of early vertical penetration. The latter
was characterized by tumor cells invading between muscle cells.

View larger version (81K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 5. Results of in vivo tumorigenesis/invasion
assays. A, examples shown include detection of tumor
cells on the diaphragm by H&E staining. B, the origin of
tumor cells growing on the peritoneal surface of the diaphragm was
confirmed by immunohistochemistry using anti-GFP antibody.
|
|
FGF8b-Mediated Epithelial-Stromal Cross-talk.
To exploit the potential FGF8b-mediated interactions between prostatic
cancer cells and stromal cells, we used a coculture system in which GFP
served as a marker to separate transduced LNCaP cells from stromal
cells by the use of flow cytometry (Fig. 6A)
. The same two human primary prostatic stromal cell
cultures described above were also used in these analyses. The stromal
cells in coculture spread out on the bottom of the culture flask
providing a mesenchymal carpet, and LNCaP cells grew on the top of
stromal cells forming gland-like structures. A microscopic view of this
coculture is presented in Fig. 6B
. The LNCaP cells were
rounder and much smaller when they were grown alone than their
counterparts in cultures. As illustrated in Fig. 7A
, the growth of prostatic stromal cells in coculture with
8b-LNCaP cells increased significantly compared with that of stromal
cells when grown with vector-LNCaP cells. The increase was
approximately 2-fold after 14 days of culture. The proliferation rate
of stromal cells in coculture with vector-LNCaP cells was, however,
similar to that of stromal cells grown alone. The growth rate of
8b-LNCaP cells in coculture was also higher than that of vector cells
cocultured with stromal cells. However, compared with the results with
LNCaP cells cultured alone (Fig. 3A)
, both 8b- and
vector-LNCaP cells showed inhibited growth in coculture with stromal
cells (Fig. 7B)
. To investigate whether the stimulatory
effect of stroma on 8b-LNCaP cells was prostate-specific, primary
stromal cells from human SV were also grown with the transduced LNCaP
cells. The cell morphology in coculture was similar to that of
prostatic stromal cell and LNCaP cocultures. After 10 days of culture,
the growth rate of these non-prostatic stromal cells in coculture with
8b-LNCaP cells increased 3-fold compared with that in coculture with
vector-cells (Fig. 7C)
. Again, there was no significant
difference in growth rate between SV stromal cells when cultured with
vector-LNCaP or cultured alone. The growth rate of 8b-LNCaP cells in
coculture with SV stroma was slightly higher than that of vector-cells
in coculture (Fig. 7D)
, but both cell types showed
remarkably restrained growth in the presence of SV stromal cells. It
was also noted that 8b-LNCaP cells and non-prostatic stromal cells
developed local confluency faster than those in coculture with
prostatic stromal cells and 8b-LNCaP cells. It was quite unique that SV
stromal cells became detached from the bottom of the culture flask once
local confluence was reached. This observation was confirmed by repeat
experiments with the same primary SV stromal cells.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 6. Estimation of cell population by flow cytometry.
A, flow cytometry assay was used to distinguish the
transduced LNCaP cells from stromal cells in coculture on the basis of
GFP expression. FL1-Height, green fluorescence
intensity; M, marker. B, a microscopic
view of LNCaP-stromal coculture.
|
|

View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 7. Effect of FGF8b in epithelial-stromal cocultures. The
rate of proliferation of prostatic stromal (A) or
seminal vesicle (SV) stromal cells (C) in
coculture with transduced LNCaP cells is contrasted with the growth of
transduced LNCaP cells in the presence of prostatic stromal
(B) or non-prostatic stromal cells (D).
|
|
Because rFGF8b had no significant direct effect on proliferation of
stromal cells, it is likely that some soluble mediator(s) is being
secreted by 8b-LNCaP cells to stimulate stromal cells in coculture. To
test this possibility, 24 h CM from transduced LNCaP cells was
applied to the primary prostatic stromal cells. As illustrated in Fig. 8
, the growth rate of stromal cells treated with CM from 8b-LNCaP cells
was clearly elevated compared with the use of vector-LNCaP cell CM
(P = 0.009).
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The interest in this work is 3-fold. First, our results
demonstrate that FGF8b produced in the LNCaP cells can function as an
autocrine stimulator of the proliferation of these cells. This effect
was previously detected using bacterially expressed rFGF8b
(17)
which, unlike FGF8b produced in mammalian cells
(3)
, lacks glycosylation. It is now documented that
whether glycosylated or not, FGF8b can induce proliferation of LNCaP
cells, thus implying that the receptor activation by the growth factor
is likely to be independent of glycosylation. In this regard, it was
reported previously that rFGF8b could efficiently activate the "c"
splice isoform of FGFR2 or FGFR3, as well as FGFR4 (28
, 29) . Although these receptor isoforms are considered to be
largely expressed in mesenchymal cells (30)
, there is
evidence of aberrant expression of FGFR isoforms in prostate cancer
cells (1
, 31)
. It is also interesting to note that among
the tissues of the male reproductive tract, only prostate appears to
exhibit wide expression of the general classes of FGFRs. For example, a
moderate level of expression of FGFR1 and FGFR2 is found in prostate
epithelium and the microvasculature, whereas stromal smooth muscle
cells exhibit a weak level of expression of FGFR3 (32)
. In
another study (30)
with primary cultures of human
prostatic epithelial and stromal cells, FGFR3 was found to be the
primary product in epithelial cells with a smaller amount of FGFR2,
whereas stromal cells express primarily FGFR3 and smaller amounts of
FGFR1 and FGFR2. Considering these observations, and recognizing that
FGF8b is naturally overexpressed in aggressive prostatic carcinoma
cells (21
, 22)
, a scenario is presented for FGF8b-FGFR
signaling in the regulation of prostatic epithelial growth.
Second, besides its ability to stimulate proliferation, it is
also shown here that FGF8b can influence the various biological
properties of the affected LNCaP cells. For example, in
vitro parameters such as soft agar clonogenicity and matrigel
invasion activity are significantly increased in 8b-LNCaP cells
relative to the vector-LNCaP cells. An argument can be made that the
observed changes of in vitro motility and invasion may be
related partly to increased proliferation. However, this is unlikely to
be a primary cause because the analyses were carried out only after
24 h, when proliferation is deemed to be quite limited. MMPs,
which degrade extracellular matrix proteins, are known to be
over-expressed in many types of cancers (33, 34, 35, 36, 37)
. There
are several reports that describe induction of MMP expression by FGF
proteins in cancer cells, including prostate cancer cells, but not in
normal epithelial cells (31
, 38, 39, 40, 41)
. Thus it is possible
that the switch between expression patterns of FGFR isoforms
that occurs in prostate cancer cells, and that may be critical for
abnormal proliferation by FGF8b, may also be responsible for activation
of MMPs, thereby facilitating tumor cell invasion. The pleiotropic
effect of FGF8b signaling is clearly documented here in the study of
the in vivo tumorigenesis/diaphragm invasion assay. Although
LNCaP cells were not tumorigenic in this assay, FGF8b expression
converted them to be not only tumorigenic but also invasive in some
animals during the 9-week period of observation. Taken together,
evidence is presented that FGF8b overexpression confers tumorigenic and
invasive properties to LNCaP cells. However, it remains to be
demonstrated whether results of the study using a single cell line
might have broader validity when other prostate cancer cells or
prostate cancer tissues are evaluated.
Finally, when we examined the effect of FGF8b on the epithelial-stromal
interactions in the setting of coculture, two important aspects were
uncovered. It is clearly evident that the proliferation of the parental
or transduced LNCaP cells is remarkably inhibited when cocultured with
stromal cells from prostatic or non-prostatic tissues. In contrast, the
growth of the stromal cells is strongly up-regulated in the presence of
FGF8b-producing LNCaP cells but not in the presence of the
control LNCaP cells. Although the autocrine regulation of LNCaP cells
by FGF8b could compensate for the stromal effect to a degree, the
negative effect of stroma still remains quite pronounced. The
stimulatory effect of 8b-LNCaP cells on stromal cells seems not to be
mediated by the released FGF8b because rFGF8b is not capable of
stimulating stromal cells. Considering that other soluble molecules or
factors induced and secreted from the FGF8b-stimulated LNCaP cells
might be responsible, we used CM on stromal cells to examine the
possibility. Because there is some positive effect of the CM on stroma,
although far less than that observed in the context of coculture, this
potential remains. Additional work will be necessary to characterize
the released stimulatory factors to obtain a better definition of the
role of FGF8b in the environment of the prostate. However, a stronger
case could be made for the importance of cell-cell contact between
epithelial and stromal cells for the observed stimulatory effect on the
stroma. This contact effect is explicitly dependent on the presence of
FGF8b-producing LNCaP cells. Thus, FGF8b signaling, beyond the release
of soluble factors, appears to be critical in stromal proliferation. It
is tempting to consider alterations of cell surface molecular
expression in LNCaP cells from FGF8b-FGFR interactions as the primary
inducer of stromal growth.
In summary, the effect of overexpression of FGF8b in LNCaP cells and
their interaction with stromal cells may have broad implications in the
progression of human prostate cancer. The autocrine stimulatory loop of
FGF8b is likely to provide advantages to the neoplastic prostatic
epithelium with respect to their proliferation and invasive properties.
Additionally, it is speculated that, during the course of invasion and
metastasis, the FGF8b producing malignant cells when in physical
contact with stromal cells may stimulate growth of stromal cells. The
accelerated proliferation of the stromal cells has, in fact, been
suggested to provide an amenable milieu for the development and
progression of cancer (42)
.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We are grateful to Robert T. Tin and Heidi Miller for technical
assistance. We thank Jiapeng Huang, Xiantuo Wu, and other members of
the Roy-Burman laboratory for their help with some experiments. We are
indebted to Lihua Zhang for manuscript preparation.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by NIH R01 CA59705 and, in part, by a
grant from the T. J. Martell Foundation. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Pathology, University of Southern
California, Keck School of Medicine, 2011 Zonal Avenue, Los Angeles, CA
90089. Phone: (323) 442-1184; Fax: (323) 442-3049; E-mail: royburma{at}usc.edu 
3 The abbreviations used are: FGF, fibroblast
growth factor; FGF8b, fibroblast growth factor 8, isoform b; CM,
conditioned medium; rFGF8b, recombinant FGF8b; VSV, vesicular
stomatitis virus; IRES, internal ribosome entry site; env,
envelope gene; GFP, green fluorescent protein; FBS, fetal bovine serum;
FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; SV, seminal vesicle; MMP,
matrix metalloprotease. 
Received 7/13/00.
Accepted 9/29/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
McKeehan W. L., Wang F., Kan M. The heparan sulfate-fibroblast growth factor family: diversity of structure and function. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 59: 135-176, 1998.[Medline]
-
Szebenyi G., Fallon J. F. Fibroblast growth factors as multifunctional signaling factors. Int. Rev. Cytol., 185: 45-106, 1999.[Medline]
-
Tanaka A., Miyamoto K., Minamino N., Takeda M., Sato B., Matsuo H., Matsumoto K. Cloning and characterization of an androgen-induced growth factor essential for the androgen-dependent growth of mouse mammary carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 8928-8932, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Heikinheimo M., Lawshe A., Shackleford G. M., Wilson D. B., MacArthur C. A. Fgf-8 expression in the post-gastrulation mouse suggests roles in the development of the face, limbs and central nervous system. Mech. Dev., 48: 129-138, 1994.[Medline]
-
Ohuchi H., Yoshioka H., Tanaka A., Kawakami Y., Nohno T., Noji S. Involvement of androgen-induced growth factor (FGF-8) gene in mouse embryogenesis and morphogenesis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 204: 882-888, 1994.[Medline]
-
Crossley P. H., Martin G. R. The mouse Fgf8 gene encodes a family of polypeptides and is expressed in regions that direct outgrowth and patterning in the developing embryo. Development (Camb.), 121: 439-451, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Lorenzi M. V., Long J. E., Miki T., Aaronson S. A. Expression cloning, developmental expression and chromosomal localization of fibroblast growth factor-8. Oncogene, 10: 2051-2055, 1995.[Medline]
-
Mahmood R., Bresnick J., Hornbruch A., Mahony C., Morton N., Colquhoun K., Martin P., Lumsden A., Dickson C., Mason I. A role for FGF-8 in the initiation and maintenance of vertebrate limb bud outgrowth. Curr. Biol., 5: 797-806, 1995.[Medline]
-
Crossley P. H., Minowada G., MacArthur C. A., Martin G. R. Roles for FGF8 in the induction, initiation, and maintenance of chick limb development. Cell, 84: 127-136, 1996.[Medline]
-
Crossley P. H., Martinez S., Martin G. R. Midbrain development induced by FGF8 in the chick embryo. Nature (Lond.), 380: 66-68, 1996.[Medline]
-
Meyers E. N., Lewandoski M., Martin G. R. An Fgf8 mutant allelic series generated by Cre- and Flp-mediated recombination. Nat. Genet., 18: 136-141, 1998.[Medline]
-
Trumpp A., Depew M. J., Rubenstein J. L., Bishop J. M., Martin G. R. Cre-mediated gene inactivation demonstrates that FGF8 is required for cell survival and patterning of the first branchial arch. Genes Dev., 13: 3136-3148, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
White R. A., Dowler L. L., Angeloni S. V., Pasztor L. M., MacArthur C. A. Assignment of FGF8 to human chromosome 10q25q26: mutations in FGF8 may be responsible for some types of acrocephalosyndactyly linked to this region. Genomics, 30: 109-111, 1995.[Medline]
-
Payson R. A., Wu J., Liu Y., Chiu I. M. The human FGF-8 gene localizes on chromosome 10q24 and is subjected to induction by androgen in breast cancer cells. Oncogene, 13: 47-53, 1996.[Medline]
-
MacArthur C. A., Lawshe A., Shankar D. B., Heikinheimo M., Shackleford G. M. FGF-8 isoforms differ in NIH3T3 cell transforming potential. Cell Growth Differ., 6: 817-825, 1995.[Abstract]
-
MacArthur C. A., Shankar D. B., Shackleford G. M. Fgf-8, activated by proviral insertion, cooperates with the Wnt-1 transgene in murine mammary tumorigenesis. J. Virol., 69: 2501-2507, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Tanaka A., Miyamoto K., Matsuo H., Matsumoto K., Yoshida H. Human androgen-induced growth factor in prostate and breast cancer cells: its molecular cloning and growth properties. FEBS Lett., 363: 226-230, 1995.[Medline]
-
Gemel J., Gorry M., Ehrlich G. D., MacArthur C. A. Structure and sequence of human FGF8. Genomics, 35: 253-257, 1996.[Medline]
-
Kouhara H., Koga M., Kasayama S., Tanaka A., Kishimoto T., Sato B. Transforming activity of a newly cloned androgen-induced growth factor. Oncogene, 9: 455-462, 1994.[Medline]
-
Ghosh A. K., Shankar D. B., Shackleford G. M., Wu K., TAng A., Miller G. J., Zheng J., Roy-Burman P. Molecular cloning and characterization of human FGF8 alternative messenger RNA forms. Cell Growth Differ., 7: 1425-1434, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Tanaka A., Furuya A., Yamasaki M., Hanai N., Kuriki K., Kamiakito T., Kobayashi Y., Yoshida H., Koike M., Fukayama M. High frequency of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) 8 expression in clinical prostate cancers and breast tissues, immunohistochemically demonstrated by a newly established neutralizing monoclonal antibody against FGF 8. Cancer Res., 58: 2053-2056, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dorkin T. J., Robinson M. C., Marsh C., Bjartell A., Neal D. E., Leung H. Y. FGF8 over-expression in prostate cancer is associated with decreased patient survival and persists in androgen independent disease. Oncogene, 18: 2755-2761, 1999.[Medline]
-
Daphna-Iken D., Shankar D. B., Lawshe A., Ornitz D. M., Shackleford G. M., MacArthur C. A. MMTV-Fgf8 transgenic mice develop mammary and salivary gland neoplasia and ovarian stromal hyperplasia. Oncogene, 17: 2711-2717, 1998.[Medline]
-
Rudra-Ganguly N., Zheng J., Hoang A. T., Roy-Burman P. Downregulation of human FGF8 activity by antisense constructs in murine fibroblastic and human prostatic carcinoma cell systems. Oncogene, 16: 1487-1492, 1998.[Medline]
-
Naldini L., Blomer U., Gallay P., Ory D., Mulligan R., Gage F. H., Verma I. M., Trono D. In vivo gene delivery and stable transduction of nondividing cells by a lentiviral vector. Science (Washington DC), 272: 263-267, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Zheng J., Rudra-Ganguly N., Powell W. C., Roy-Burman P. Suppression of prostate carcinoma cell invasion by expression of antisense L-plastin gene. Am. J. Pathol., 155: 115-122, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Powell W. C., Knox J. D., Navre M., Grogan T. M., Kittelson J., Nagle R. B., Bowden G. T. Expression of the metalloproteinase matrilysin in DU-145 cells increases their invasive potential in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Cancer Res., 53: 417-422, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
MacArthur C. A., Lawshe A., Xu J., Santos-Ocampo S., Heikinheimo M., Chellaiah A. T., Ornitz D. M. FGF-8 isoforms activate receptor splice forms that are expressed in mesenchymal regions of mouse development. Development (Camb.), 121: 3603-3613, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Blunt A. G., Lawshe A., Cunningham M. L., Seto M. L., Ornitz D. M., MacArthur C. A. Overlapping expression and redundant activation of mesenchymal fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptors by alternatively spliced FGF-8 ligands. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 3733-3738, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ittman M., Mansukhani A. Expression of fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and FGF receptors in human prostate. J. Urol., 157: 351-356, 1997.[Medline]
-
Klein R. D., Maliner-Jongewaard M. S., Udayakumar T. S., Boyd J. L., Nagle R. B., Bowden G. T. Promatrilysin expression is induced by fibroblast growth factors in the prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP but not in normal primary prostate epithelial cells. Prostate, 41: 215-223, 1999.[Medline]
-
Hughes S. E. Differential expression of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) multigene family in normal human adult tissues. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 45: 1005-1019, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Basset P., Bellocq J. P., Wolf C., Stoll I., Hutin P., Limacher J. M., Podhajcer O. L., Chenard M. P., Rio M. C., Chambon P. A novel metalloproteinase gene specifically expressed in stromal cells of breast carcinomas. Nature (Lond.), 348: 699-704, 1990.[Medline]
-
Newell K. J., Witty J. P., Rodgers W. H., Matrisian L. M. Expression and localization of matrix-degrading metalloproteinases during colorectal tumorigenesis. Mol. Carcinog., 10: 199-206, 1994.[Medline]
-
McDonnell S., Navre M., Coffey R. J., Jr., Matrisian L. M. Expression and localization of the matrix metalloproteinase pump-1 (MMP-7) in human gastric and colon carcinomas. Mol. Carcinog., 4: 527-533, 1991.[Medline]
-
Karelina T. V., Goldberg G. I., Eisen A. Z. Matrilysin (PUMP) correlates with dermal invasion during appendageal development and cutaneous neoplasia. J. Invest. Dermatol., 103: 482-487, 1994.[Medline]
-
Pajouh M. S., Nagle R. B., Breathnach R., Finch J. S., Brawer M. K., Bowden G. T. Expression of metalloproteinase genes in human prostate cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol., 117: 144-150, 1991.[Medline]
-
Miyagi N., Kato S., Terasaki M., Shigemori M., Morimatsu M. Fibroblast growth factor-2 and -9 regulate proliferation and production of matrix metalloproteinases in human gliomas. Int. J. Oncol., 12: 1085-1090, 1998.[Medline]
-
Miyake H., Yoshimura K., Hara I., Eto H., Arakawa S., Kamidono S. Basic fibroblast growth factor regulates matrix metalloproteinases production and in vitro invasiveness in human bladder cancer cell lines. J. Urol., 157: 2351-2355, 1997.[Medline]
-
Kurogi T., Nabeshima K., Kataoka H., Okada Y., Koono M. Stimulation of gelatinase B and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinase (TIMP) production in co-culture of human osteosarcoma cells and human fibroblasts: gelatinase B production was stimulated via up-regulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor. Int. J. Cancer, 66: 82-90, 1996.[Medline]
-
Uria J. A., Balbin M., Lopez J. M., Alvarez J., Vizoso F., Takigawa M., Lopez-Otin C. Collagenase-3 (MMP-13) expression in chondrosarcoma cells and its regulation by basic fibroblast growth factor. Am. J. Pathol., 153: 91-101, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rowley D. R. What might a stromal response mean to prostate cancer progression?. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 17: 411-419, 1998.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Yang, M. Lim, L. K. Pham, S. E. Kendall, A. H. Reddi, D. C. Altieri, and P. Roy-Burman
Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Protects Prostate Cancer Cells from Stress-Induced Apoptosis via Both Smad and c-Jun NH2-Terminal Kinase Pathways.
Cancer Res.,
April 15, 2006;
66(8):
4285 - 4290.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Zhong, G. Saribekyan, C.-P. Liao, M. B. Cohen, and P. Roy-Burman
Cooperation between FGF8b Overexpression and PTEN Deficiency in Prostate Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2006;
66(4):
2188 - 2194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. C. Khodavirdi, Z. Song, S. Yang, C. Zhong, S. Wang, H. Wu, C. Pritchard, P. S. Nelson, and P. Roy-Burman
Increased Expression of Osteopontin Contributes to the Progression of Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res.,
January 15, 2006;
66(2):
883 - 888.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Hagisawa, C. Ohyama, T. Takahashi, M. Endoh, T. Moriya, J. Nakayama, Y. Arai, and M. Fukuda
Expression of core 2 {beta}1,6-N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase facilitates prostate cancer progression
Glycobiology,
October 1, 2005;
15(10):
1016 - 1024.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Yang, C. Zhong, B. Frenkel, A. H. Reddi, and P. Roy-Burman
Diverse Biological Effect and Smad Signaling of Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 in Prostate Tumor Cells
Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2005;
65(13):
5769 - 5777.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
N. Shimada, T. Ishii, T. Imada, K. Takaba, Y. Sasaki, K. Maruyama-Takahashi, Y. Maekawa-Tokuda, H. Kusaka, S. Akinaga, A. Tanaka, et al.
A Neutralizing Anti-Fibroblast Growth Factor 8 Monoclonal Antibody Shows Potent Antitumor Activity against Androgen-Dependent Mouse Mammary Tumors In vivo
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2005;
11(10):
3897 - 3904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. Ishibe, T. Nakayama, T. Okamoto, T. Aoyama, K. Nishijo, K. R. Shibata, Y. Shima, S. Nagayama, T. Katagiri, Y. Nakamura, et al.
Disruption of Fibroblast Growth Factor Signal Pathway Inhibits the Growth of Synovial Sarcomas: Potential Application of Signal Inhibitors to Molecular Target Therapy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2005;
11(7):
2702 - 2712.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B Kwabi-Addo, M Ozen, and M Ittmann
The role of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors in prostate cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer,
December 1, 2004;
11(4):
709 - 724.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Song, X. Wu, W. C. Powell, R. D. Cardiff, M. B. Cohen, R. T. Tin, R. J. Matusik, G. J. Miller, and P. Roy-Burman
Fibroblast Growth Factor 8 Isoform b Overexpression in Prostate Epithelium: A New Mouse Model for Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia
Cancer Res.,
September 1, 2002;
62(17):
5096 - 5105.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|