This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buerger, H. Articles by Brandt, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buerger, H. Articles by Brandt, B.

Length and Loss of Heterozygosity of an Intron 1 Polymorphic Sequence of egfr Is Related to Cytogenetic Alterations and Epithelial Growth Factor Receptor Expression¹

Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology [H. B., R. S., W. B.], Institute of Clinical Chemistry [F. G., H. S., A. B., K. H., B. B.], and Department of Gynecology [R. L.], University of Münster, 48149 Münster, Germany

	ABSTRACT

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 
Overexpression of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) is correlated with a poor prognosis and reduced steroid receptor expression. Recently, it was demonstrated that the length of a CA repeat in the intron 1 of EGFR correlated with the expression of EGFR in vitro. We investigated 112 cases of cancerous and noncancerous breast tumor samples for loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in intron 1 of the egfr gene and determined the intratumoral EGFR content and genetic alterations by comparative genomic hybridization. Heterozygous tumors with short CA repeats showed elevated EGFR expression in contrast to tumors with longer CA repeats. Tumors with LOH in intron 1 of egfr revealed higher EGFR expression when the longer allele was lost compared with loss of the shorter allele. Additionally, tumors with a loss of the long allele showed more chromosomal alterations, especially a higher frequency of amplifications. We conclude that the CA repeat status in intron 1 of the egfr gene also modulates the intratumoral EGFR content in vivo. Furthermore, LOH at the CA repeat is associated with genetically advanced tumors. Therefore, allele-specific gene expression due to LOH of the CA repeat could be assumed to be an important event in invasive breast cancer development.

	Introduction

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 
Invasive breast cancer is characterized by a broad spectrum of genetic alterations and heterogeneous morphological differentiation. The first evidence exists that different morphological subtypes might be associated with specific genetic alterations (1) . A large variety of growth factors have been described in the pathogenesis and progression of invasive breast cancer. Proteins of the epithelial growth factor receptor superfamily are among the most investigated in this heterogeneous disease and are known to play a crucial role in the differentiation of the mammary gland (2) . EGFR (erbB-1) stimulates cell growth and differentiation after binding of specific ligands, such as transforming growth factor- (3) . Thereby, EGFR³ acts as membrane-bound receptor with intrinsic tyrosine kinase activity in the intracellular domain (4) . Overexpression has been shown to transform NIH 3T3 cells in an EGF-dependent manner. Dimerization with other erbB receptors (erbB-2, -3, and -4) and the activation of the kinase domain are essential for phosphorylation of a variety of intracellular protein cascades. Overexpression of EGFR was inversely correlated with steroid receptor expression and positively with an unfavorable prognosis. In a study published by this group, a critical EGFR content of 56 fmol/mg was defined (5) .

Overexpression of EGFR protein has been linked to amplifications of the egfr gene located to 7p13–12. In the majority of the tumors and especially in breast cancer, the main reason for overexpression has to be viewed at the gene transcription level (6) . In a study published recently by this group, it was shown that the length of a highly polymorphic sequence in intron 1 of the egfr gene is directly correlated to the transcriptional activity of egfr in vitro and therefore might explain different expression levels of EGFR in humans (7) .

Transferring these data to in vivo, this would lead to the hypothesis that humans with shorter alleles would show a higher level of EGFR expression in breast tumors and, furthermore, that LOH within this region would also lead to altered expression.

To investigate the relationship between the length of the polymorphic site within intron 1 to the expression level of EGFR, we performed microsatellite analysis on the polymorphic site close to intron 1, measured the content of EGFR by ELISA, and gained an overall indication of unbalanced chromosomal alterations using CGH.

	Materials and Methods

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 
Fresh tumorous material of 112 tumor samples from 103 patients was investigated. The tumorous material and reference lymphocytes were obtained from patients treated in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the University of Münster in the period of 1995–1997. All cases were classified according to standard protocols in the Gerhard-Domagk-Institute of Pathology, University of Münster. The cases were graded as ductal invasive (n = 56), poorly differentiated DCIS (n = 3), lobular invasive (n = 18), tumors of mixed differentiation (n = 15), tubular invasive (n = 4), tubulo-lobular invasive (n = 3), medullary invasive (n = 1), and mucinous invasive (n = 1). Seven cases of mastopathia, three samples of fibroadenomas, and one adenosis could be analyzed. In two cases, an associated DCIS located next to the invasive carcinoma and the corresponding lymph node metastasis of the same patient could be analyzed. In these cases, formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue was used. Staging was performed using the criteria of the tumor-node-metastasis system and of the Union International Contre Cancer. The age range of the patients was 18–85 years, with an average age of 60.2 years.

Steroid Receptor Immunohistochemistry.
Immunohistochemical evaluation of the steroid receptor content was done according to standard protocols as described elsewhere (8) .

EGFR Expression.
The tumor samples were frozen in liquid nitrogen and homogenized in chilled 5 mM phosphate buffer containing 1 mM monothioglycerol and 10% glycerol (pH 7.5). An immunoenzymatic assay was used for the quantification of EGFR (EGF-Rezeptor ELISA; ImmunDiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany). The EGFR concentration was determined by comparison with recombinant standard material and expressed as fmol/mg membrane material.

Determination of the Number of CA Repeats in Intron 1.
A 114- to 128-bp PCR fragment containing the polymorphic region was amplified with 50 pmol of previously described primers (9) . One of the primers was labeled with fluorescein at the 5' end. The 50-µl PCR reaction mixture contained 200 ng of tumor DNA, 1.5 mM MgCl₂, 7.5% DMSO (Sigma), 100 µM each dNTP (Perkin-Elmer), 1x PCR amplification buffer, 1.5 units of Taq polymerase (Promega), and liquid white mineral oil (Sigma). After PCR, 1 µl of the products plus 0.3 µl of Genescan 500 TAMRA molecular weight standard (Applied Biosystems) were denatured in 12 µl of formamide, separated in an Applied Biosystems Prism Genetic Analyzer with POP4 polymer, and fragment lengths were determined. Genotyper software (PE) and Excel software (Microsoft) were used for allele scoring and assessment of LOH. The scans for constitutional heterozygous patients were analyzed by comparison of the peak area of the two alleles in the normal tissue (leukocytes) and in the tumor tissue by the following equation (9) : LOH score = T₁ x N₂/T₂ x N₁, where T is tumor, N is normal, 1 is the area under the peak corresponding to the shorter allele, and 2 is the area under the peak corresponding to the longer allele. LOH assessment of the egfr microsatellite was not complicated or invalidated by extra bands microsatellite instability or stutter bands. The reproducibility of allele length and allele peak area evaluation was determined using 10 runs of PCR products from normal DNA from different persons’ leukocytes. The SD for the allele length was 0.3 bp. For the ratio of the normal allele peak areas (N₂/N₁), the SD was 0.07. Therefore, the result was statistically significantly different from the ratio of the normal allele peak areas when the LOH score was <0.79 (loss of the longer allele) or >1.27 (loss of the shorter allele; Ref. 10 ).

CGH.
The CGH analysis and the criteria for the evaluation of copy number changes have been described elsewhere (11) . Tumor DNA (300 ng) was labeled by a standard nick-translation reaction with biotin-16-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany). Reference DNA (300 ng) from a healthy female donor was labeled with digoxigenin-11-dUTP (Boehringer Mannheim).

The Cytovision 3.1 (Applied Imaging) software package was applied for digital image analysis and subsequent karyotyping.

Laser Microdissection.
Tissue from two cases of DCIS with LOH in the associated invasive carcinoma was analyzed after laser-based microdissection (Palm, Bernried, Germany).

Statistical Analysis.
For statistical analysis, the unpaired Student’s t test and the ² test were used.

	Results

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 
LOH of the Polymorphic Site of the EGFR Receptor in Intron 1.
Eighty-two percent of the patients were informative for the locus investigated. No difference in patient age in relation to allele status or LOH was seen. In 57 patients, the smaller allele had a length of 16 CA repeats; in the remaining cases, the second most prevalent bp length was 20 CA repeats (n = 17). The most prevalent genotype comprised 16 and 20 CA repeats (n = 22).

Thirty-two patients showed a LOH; in 11 patients, the smaller allele was lost, in 21, the longer allele was lost (P < 0.05). One case of mastopathia and one case of an adenosis showed LOH. In two cases, the associated DCIS and the corresponding lymph node metastasis revealed the same LOH as the primary tumor (Fig. 1B) . A correlation between the frequency of alleles or the occurrence of LOH and histology, grading, or tumor status could not be drawn.

View larger version (46K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 1. B, examples of average ratio profiles of chromosome 7 alterations revealed by CGH. The vertical broad central line indicates the fluorescence ratio of balanced DNA sequence copy number state (1.0) between tumor and reference DNA. The vertical lines to the left represent the 0.75 and 0.5 thresholds for losses, the vertical lines to the right represent the 1.25, 1.5, and 1.75 thresholds for gains. The ratio profiles show the mean fluorescence ratio (central) and the 95% confidence limits (leftand right of central line). Chromosome numbers are indicated. B, example of a LOH in intron 1 of the egfr gene. Upper left, heterozygosity in blood lymphocytes; upper right, LOH in invasive breast cancer of the same patient; lower left, LOH in associated DCIS; lower right, LOH in corresponding lymph node metastasis.

EGFR Expression, Allele Length, and Hemizygosity.
In all cases, heterozygous samples showed a lower level of intratumoral EGFR protein [76.8 ± 47.7 fmol/mg (mean ± SD); median, 68.4 fmol/mg; n = 18] in contrast to homozygous cases (224.47 ± 246.7 fmol/mg; median, 88.7 fmol/mg; n = 56; P < 0.01).

Regarding EGFR expression in correlation to the length of the smaller allele in all tumors, a constant decline in the intratumoral EGFR content could be demonstrated with an increasing length of the smaller allele (Fig. 2A) . The highest levels were measured in tumors with a length of 15 CA repeats (127.5 ± 47.4 fmol/mg; n = 6), and the lowest levels were measured in tumors with 18 CA repeats (52.0 ± 59.1 fmol/mg; n = 17) as the smaller allele (P < 0.05).

View larger version (27K): [in this window] [in a new window]   Fig. 2. A, graphical illustration of the influence of the smaller CA repeat allele on EGFR expression. The number of CA repeats in intron 1 is indicated on the X axis, the expression of EGFR on the Y axis (fmol/mg). Mean values with the corresponding standard deviations (bars) are indicated. B, illustration of the influence of LOH on EGFR expression with a defined example of a 16/20 CA repeat allele composition. Columns represent the median; points and vertical lines represent mean values and the corresponding standard deviations.

Cases with a prognostically unfavorable intratumoral EGFR content of >56 fmol/mg (n = 41) showed almost exclusively a short allele with 16–18 CA repeats. Twelve of these cases revealed LOH, 9 of them with a loss of the longer allele.

EGFR Expression and Steroid Receptor Immunohistochemistry.
Twenty-four tumors showed no expression of the estrogen receptor, 6 of them with LOH. The EGFR content was elevated (mean ± SD, 119.4 ± 137.7 fmol/mg) in these tumors. Twenty-seven tumors were negative for progesterone receptor, 8 of them with LOH in intron 1. Here also an elevated EGFR concentration could be demonstrated (mean ± SD, 143.3 ± 155.5 fmol/mg).

	Discussion

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 
In human breast cancer, overexpression of EGFR is associated with short disease-free and overall survival. As shown in several studies, low estrogen receptor expression was inversely related to EGFR expression (12) . The background of this finding and the genetic basis of EGFR overexpression remain unclear. Thus far, amplifications of the egfr gene (7p13) has been revealed only in a small subset of breast cancers (13) . In egfr, the regulatory sequences of the gene have been demonstrated within the 5'-flanking region and intron 1. Two sequences with enhancer activity were located upstream of the promoter and downstream in intron 1 (14) . Close to the downstream enhancer, a polymorphic simple sequence repeat of 14–22 CA repeats was found. In egfr, the number of CA repeats in intron 1 correlates with the in vitro transcription of the gene (7) . In this study, we could show that these results can be transferred to a clinical background. The most prevalent allele composition in the population investigated is a 16/20 CA repeat combination. Interestingly, it is noteworthy that >90% of all women in this population presented with at least one short allele.⁴ Loss of LOH, irrespective of which allele is lost, was not significantly correlated with altered EGFR expression. Nevertheless, LOH does not lead to the total suppression of the EGFR expression. In contrast, cases with a loss of the 16 CA repeat allele showed a lower intratumor protein concentration than those with a loss of the longer 22 CA repeat. This could be further substantiated in the rest of the tumors investigated. Tumors with homozygous allele status showed higher gene expression than heterozygous cases. This probably can be explained by the fact that in our series, the majority of the homozygous patients revealed a 16/16 CA repeat combination, and therefore this short allele was transcribed with higher activity. As well as in the defined subgroup mentioned above, all tumors with LOH of the longer allele revealed higher intratumoral EGFR content in contrast to the tumors with loss of the short allele. The influence of the polymorphic sequence can also be demonstrated in heterozygous tumors without LOH. In these cases, the effect is not as dramatic as in tumors with LOH or in homozygous samples, but the tendency is obvious. Regarding only the smaller allele as reference independent of LOH, EGFR expression constantly decreased with increasing length of the CA repeat in intron 1. The high standard deviations might explain that other mechanism in these heterozygous tumors also influence the expression of EGFR, as shown in previous in vitro studies [(7) and Fig. 2A ].

Nevertheless, we interpret these results as first evidence that the in vivo expression of EGFR in a subset of breast cancer is correlated with the length of the CA repeat in intron 1 of the egfr gene. This finding is not only interesting in relation to tumor progression, it also could give a first clue to explain the function of microsatellites in correlation to the individually different gene expression. Therefore, the length of the CA repeat in intron 1 of the egfr gene might be one factor in the predisposition to human breast cancer. A significant predominance of LOH in intron 1 of the egfr gene in a certain morphological subgroup, such as ductal invasive or lobular invasive carcinoma, could not be detected. Additionally, LOH occurred independently of tumor grading and staging. This is different from BRCA1, where mutations were associated with grade 3 tumors, indicating a low differentiation. Nevertheless, these findings must be established in a larger cohort of tumor samples. Mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes are reflected on a cytogenetic level. Breast cancer tissue with mutations in either of the genes showed an elevated average number of alterations as well as an increased rate of amplifications (15) . The number of cases investigated in this series might be too small to draw definite conclusions. Nevertheless, the first results show similar results with an increase of the average number of alterations and the rate of tumors with gene amplifications. Tumors with loss of the longer allele showed almost five times more gene amplifications and an increase of the average number of genetic alterations.

Furthermore, it is of interest that a distinct polymorphism in intron 1 or LOH of one allele seems not to be associated with a distinct cytogenetic pathway, as described by our group earlier (1 , 16) . They also are not correlated with distinct genetic alterations, which furthermore stresses the hypothesis that allele-specific gene expression levels due to short polymorphic sequences or LOH are early factors in the carcinogenesis of human breast cancer. The hypothesis that LOH might be an early event in the carcinogenesis of breast cancer is sustained by the fact that LOH was detected in one case of an adenosis and one case of a mastopathia. Additionally, it could be shown in two cases with a DCIS–invasive carcinoma–metastasis sequence, that the LOH occurs in early premalignant tumors of the breast.

There is strong evidence that the increased expression of EGFR is not associated with gross genetic alterations involving chromosome 7p. On a cytogenetic level, amplifications involving the egfr gene locus are a rare event. In several studies, losses or isolated gains of chromosome 7p were found in <5% of all tumors investigated (1 , 17 , 18) . Two of our cases revealed high-level gains of the whole short arm of chromosome 7. It is noteworthy that one of these tumors showed only low intratumoral EGFR content (19 fmol/mg); unfortunately, in the other tumor sample, protein extraction was not possible. Similar to other epithelial neoplasms, altered EGFR expression, therefore, is not reflected on the cytogenetic level (19) , and microdeletions in the egfr gene play a much more important role in gene expression.

It has been speculated that reduced EGFR expression at the time of exposure to carcinogens might account for a higher resistance toward development of breast cancer in rats (20) . The hypothetical combination of inherited CA repeats with different lengths and their direct influence on EGFR expression and further losses of CA repeats, possibly due to chemical carcinogenesis, might therefore bridge the gap between different genetic and epigenetic factors in the carcinogenesis of invasive breast cancer.

	FOOTNOTES

 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

¹ Supported by the Deutsche Krebshilfe Foundation and grants of the University of Münster (IMF).

² To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Institute of Clinical Chemistry, Albert-Schweitzer-Strasse 33, 48149 Münster, Germany. Phone: 49-2-51-83-47226; Fax: 49-2-51-83-47226.

³ The abbreviations used are: EGFR, epithelial growth factor receptor; CGH, comparative genomic hybridization; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; DCIS, ductal carcinoma in situ.

⁴ Unpublished data.

Received 9/17/99. Accepted 12/30/99.

	REFERENCES

Top ABSTRACT Introduction Materials and Methods Results Discussion REFERENCES

 

1. Buerger H., Otterbach F., Simon R., Poremba C., Diallo R., Brinkschmidt C., Riethdorf L., Decker T., Dockhorn-Dworniczak B., Boecker W. CGH-investigations in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast—evidence of multiple genetic pathways in the evolution of breast cancer. J. Pathol., 187: 396-402, 1999.[Medline]
2. Ignar-Trowbridge D. M., Nelson K. G., Bidwell M. C., Curtis S. W., Washburn T. F., Lachlan J. A., Korach K. S. Coupling of dual signaling pathways: epidermal growth factor action involves the estrogen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 4658-4662, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
3. Laurence P., Gusterson B. The epidermal growth factor. A review of structural and functional relationships in the normal organism and in cancer cells. Tumor Biol., 11: 229-261, 1990.
4. Velu T. J., Beguinot L., Vass W. C., Willingham M. C., Merlino G. T., Pastan I., Lowy D. R. Epidermal-growth-factor-dependent transformation by a human EGF receptor proto-oncogene. Science (Washington DC), 238: 1408-1410, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
5. Brandt B. H., Beckmann A., Gebhardt F., Rotger A., Jackisch C., Assmann G., Zanker K. S. Translational research studies of erbB oncogenes: selection strategies for breast cancer treatment. Cancer Lett., 118: 143-151, 1997.[Medline]
6. Merlino G., Ishii N., Whang P. J., Knutsen T., Xu Y. H., Clark A., Stratton R. H., Wilson R. K., Pow M., Roe B. A., Hunts J. H., Shimizu N., Pastan I. Structure and localization of genes encoding aberrant and normal epidermal growth factor receptor RNAs from A431 human carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 5: 1722-1734, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
7. Gebhardt F., Zanker K. S., Brandt B. Modulation of epidermal growth factor receptor gene transcription by a polymorphic dinucleotide repeat in intron 1. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 13176-13180, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
8. Bier B., Bankfalvi A., Grote L., Blasius S., Öfner D., Böcker W., Jasani B., Schmid K. W. Wet autoclave pretreatment for immunohistochemical demonstration of oestrogen receptors in routinely-processed breast carcinoma tissue. Histochem. J., 27: 148-154, 1995.[Medline]
9. Chi D. D., Hing A. V., Helms C., Steinbrueck T., Mishra S. K., Donis K. H. Two chromosome 7 dinucleotide repeat polymorphisms at gene loci epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and pro 2(I) collagen (COL1A2). Hum. Mol. Genet., 1: 135-137, 1992.[Free Full Text]
10. Canzian F., Salovaara R., Hemminki A., Kristo P., Aaltonen L. A., de la Chapelle A. Semiautomated assessment of loss of heterozygosity and replication error in tumors. Cancer Res., 56: 3331-3337, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Simon R., Buerger H., Brinkschmidt C., Bocker W., Hertle L., Terpe H. J. Chromosomal aberrations associated with invasion in papillary superficial bladder cancer. J. Pathol., 185: 345-351, 1998.[Medline]
12. Khazaie K., Schirrmacher V., Lichtner R. B. EGF receptor in neoplasia and metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev., 12: 255-274, 1993.[Medline]
13. Roetger A., Brandt B., Barnekow A. Competitive-differential polymerase chain reaction for gene dosage estimation of erbB-1 (egfr), erbB-2, and erbB-3 oncogenes. DNA Cell Biol., 16: 443-448, 1997.[Medline]
14. Chrysogelos S. A. Chromatin structure of the EGFR gene suggests a role for intron 1 sequences in its regulation in breast cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res., 21: 5736-5741, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
15. Tirkkonen M., Johannsson O., Agnarsson B. A., Olsson H., Ingvarsson S., Karhu R., Tanner M., Isola J., Barkardottir R. B., Borg A., Kallioniemi O. P. Distinct somatic genetic changes associated with tumor progression in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 germ-line mutations. Cancer Res., 57: 1222-1227, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
16. Buerger H., Otterbach F., Simon R., Schaefer K-L., Diallo R., Poremba C., Brinkschmidt C., Dockhorn-Dworniczak B., Boecker W. Different genetic pathways in the evolution of invasive breast cancer are associated with distinct morphological subtypes. J. Pathol., 189: 521-526, 1999.[Medline]
17. Kallioniemi A., Kallioniemi O. P., Piper J., Tanner M., Stokke T., Chen L., Smith H. S., Pinkel D., Gray J. W., Waldman F. M. Detection and mapping of amplified DNA sequences in breast cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 2156-2160, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
18. Ried T., Just K. E., Holtgreve G. H., du M. S., Speicher M. R., Schrock E., Latham C., Blegen H., Zetterberg A., Cremer T., Gert A. Comparative genomic hybridization of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors reveals different patterns of chromosomal gains and losses in fibroadenomas and diploid and aneuploid carcinomas. Cancer Res., 55: 5415-5423, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
19. Moch H., Sauter G., Gasser T. C., Bubendorf L., Richter J., Presti J. C., Jr., Waldman F. M., Mihatsch M. J. EGF-r gene copy number changes in renal cell carcinoma detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization. J. Pathol., 184: 424-429, 1998.[Medline]
20. Brown N. M., Wang J., Cotroneo M. S., Zhao Y. X., Lamartiniere C. A. Prepubertal genistein treatment modulates TGF-, EGF, and EGF-receptor mRNAs and proteins in the rat mammary gland. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 144: 149-165, 1998.[Medline]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				O. A. Press, W. Zhang, M. A. Gordon, D. Yang, G. Lurje, S. Iqbal, A. El-Khoueiry, and H.-J. Lenz Gender-Related Survival Differences Associated with EGFR Polymorphisms in Metastatic Colon Cancer Cancer Res., April 15, 2008; 68(8): 3037 - 3042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. M. Rudin, W. Liu, A. Desai, T. Karrison, X. Jiang, L. Janisch, S. Das, J. Ramirez, B. Poonkuzhali, E. Schuetz, et al. Pharmacogenomic and Pharmacokinetic Determinants of Erlotinib Toxicity J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2008; 26(7): 1119 - 1127. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Liu, X. Wu, W. Zhang, R. C. Montenegro, D. L. Fackenthal, J. A. Spitz, L. M. Huff, F. Innocenti, S. Das, E. H. Cook, Jr., et al. Relationship of EGFR Mutations, Expression, Amplification, and Polymorphisms to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors in the NCI60 Cell Lines Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2007; 13(22): 6788 - 6795. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-W. D. Tzeng, A. Frolov, N. Frolova, N. C. Jhala, J. H. Howard, S. M. Vickers, D. J. Buchsbaum, M. J. Heslin, and J. P. Arnoletti Pancreatic Cancer Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Intron 1 Polymorphism Influences Postoperative Patient Survival and in vitro Erlotinib Response Ann. Surg. Oncol., July 1, 2007; 14(7): 2150 - 2158. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Araujo, R. Ribeiro, I. Azevedo, A. Coelho, M. Soares, B. Sousa, D. Pinto, C. Lopes, R. Medeiros, and G. V. Scagliotti Genetic Polymorphisms of the Epidermal Growth Factor and Related Receptor in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer--A Review of the Literature Oncologist, February 1, 2007; 12(2): 201 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Brandt, S. Meyer-Staeckling, H. Schmidt, K. Agelopoulos, and H. Buerger Mechanisms of egfr Gene Transcription Modulation: Relationship to Cancer Risk and Therapy Response Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2006; 12(24): 7252 - 7260. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Cusatis, V. Gregorc, J. Li, A. Spreafico, R. G. Ingersoll, J. Verweij, V. Ludovini, E. Villa, M. Hidalgo, A. Sparreboom, et al. Pharmacogenetics of ABCG2 and Adverse Reactions to Gefitinib J Natl Cancer Inst, December 6, 2006; 98(23): 1739 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. L. Lorenzi, W. C. Reinhold, M. Rudelius, M. Gunsior, U. Shankavaram, K. J. Bussey, U. Scherf, G. S. Eichler, S. E. Martin, K. Chin, et al. Asparagine synthetase as a causal, predictive biomarker for L-asparaginase activity in ovarian cancer cells Mol. Cancer Ther., November 1, 2006; 5(11): 2613 - 2623. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. Schmidt, G. DeAngelis, E. Eltze, I. Gockel, A. Semjonow, and B. Brandt Asynchronous Growth of Prostate Cancer Is Reflected by Circulating Tumor Cells Delivered from Distinct, Even Small Foci, Harboring Loss of Heterozygosity of the PTEN Gene. Cancer Res., September 15, 2006; 66(18): 8959 - 8965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Francoual, M.-C. Etienne-Grimaldi, J.-L. Formento, D. Benchimol, A. Bourgeon, M. Chazal, C. Letoublon, T. Andre, N. Gilly, J.-R. Delpero, et al. EGFR in colorectal cancer: more than a simple receptor Ann. Onc., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 962 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. E. Bates and T. Fojo Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors: A Moving Target? Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 11(20): 7203 - 7205. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. P. Dicker and U. Rodeck Predicting the Future From Trials of the Past: Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression and Outcome of Fractionated Radiation Therapy Trials J. Clin. Oncol., August 20, 2005; 23(24): 5437 - 5439. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Taron, Y. Ichinose, R. Rosell, T. Mok, B. Massuti, L. Zamora, J. L. Mate, C. Manegold, M. Ono, C. Queralt, et al. Activating Mutations in the Tyrosine Kinase Domain of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Are Associated with Improved Survival in Gefitinib-Treated Chemorefractory Lung Adenocarcinomas Clin. Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 11(16): 5878 - 5885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bianco, T. Troiani, G. Tortora, and F. Ciardiello Intrinsic and acquired resistance to EGFR inhibitors in human cancer therapy Endocr. Relat. Cancer, July 1, 2005; 12(Supplement_1): S159 - S171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.-C. Etienne-Grimaldi, S. Pereira, N. Magne, J.-L. Formento, M. Francoual, X. Fontana, F. Demard, O. Dassonville, G. Poissonnet, J. Santini, et al. Analysis of the dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in head and neck cancer patients Ann. Onc., June 1, 2005; 16(6): 934 - 941. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Giaccone HER1/EGFR-targeted agents: predicting the future for patients with unpredictable outcomes to therapy Ann. Onc., April 1, 2005; 16(4): 538 - 548. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Zhang, D. J. Park, B. Lu, D. Y. Yang, M. Gordon, S. Groshen, J. Yun, O. A. Press, D. Vallbohmer, K. Rhodes, et al. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Polymorphisms Predict Pelvic Recurrence in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with Chemoradiation Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 600 - 605. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Liu, F. Innocenti, M. H. Wu, A. A. Desai, M. E. Dolan, E. H. Cook Jr., and M. J. Ratain A Functional Common Polymorphism in a Sp1 Recognition Site of the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Gene Promoter Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 46 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. L. Amador, D. Oppenheimer, S. Perea, A. Maitra, G. Cusati, C. Iacobuzio-Donahue, S. D. Baker, R. Ashfaq, C. Takimoto, A. Forastiere, et al. An Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Intron 1 Polymorphism Mediates Response to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 64(24): 9139 - 9143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Shuch, M. Mikhail, J. Satagopan, P. Lee, H. Yee, C. Chang, C. Cordon-Cardo, S. S. Taneja, and I. Osman Racial Disparity of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression in Prostate Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., December 1, 2004; 22(23): 4725 - 4729. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. van der Groep, A. Bouter, R. van der Zanden, F. H. Menko, H. Buerger, R. H.M. Verheijen, E. van der Wall, and P. J. van Diest Re: Germline BRCA1 Mutations and a Basal Epithelial Phenotype in Breast Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, May 5, 2004; 96(9): 712 - 713. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Brandt, S. Hermann, K. Straif, N. Tidow, H. Buerger, and J. Chang-Claude Modification of Breast Cancer Risk in Young Women by a Polymorphic Sequence in the egfr Gene Cancer Res., January 1, 2004; 64(1): 7 - 12. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K Agelopoulos, N Tidow, E Korsching, R Voss, B Hinrichs, B Brandt, W Boecker, and H Buerger Molecular cytogenetic investigations of synchronous bilateral breast cancer J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 56(9): 660 - 665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Tidow, A. Boecker, H. Schmidt, K. Agelopoulos, W. Boecker, H. Buerger, and B. Brandt Distinct Amplification of an Untranslated Regulatory Sequence in the egfr Gene Contributes to Early Steps in Breast Cancer Development Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1172 - 1178. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Liu, F. Innocenti, P. Chen, S. Das, E. H. Cook Jr., and M. J. Ratain Interethnic Difference in the Allelic Distribution of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Intron 1 Polymorphism Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 9(3): 1009 - 1012. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H Buerger, H Schmidt, A Beckmann, K S Zanker, W Boecker, and B Brandt Genetic characterisation of invasive breast cancer: a comparison of CGH and PCR based multiplex microsatellite analysis J. Clin. Pathol., November 1, 2001; 54(11): 836 - 840. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Buerger, H. Articles by Brandt, B. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Buerger, H. Articles by Brandt, B.