[Cancer Research 60, 873-876, February 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the E-cadherin Gene Promoter Alters Transcriptional Activities1
Long-Cheng Li,
Richard M. Chui,
Masahiro Sasaki,
Koichi Nakajima,
Geetha Perinchery,
Harry C. Au,
Dana Nojima,
Peter Carroll and
Rajvir Dahiya2
Department of Urology, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, and University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94121
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
E-cadherin plays a critical role in many aspects of cell adhesion,
epithelial development, and the establishment and maintenance of
epithelial polarity. The loss of the adhesive function of E-cadherin is
a critical step in the promotion of epithelial cells to a more
malignant phenotype. We identified a C/A single nucleotide polymorphism
at -160 from the transcriptional start site of the
E-cadherin gene promoter. Transient transfection
experiments showed that the A allele of this polymorphism
decreased the transcriptional efficiency by 68% compared with the
C allele (P < 0.001).
Electrophoretic mobility shift and footprinting assays revealed that
the C allele had a stronger transcriptional factor binding
strength than the A allele. These results indicate that the
-160 C/A polymorphism has a direct effect on E-cadherin
gene transcriptional regulation. This allelic variation may be a
potential genetic marker that can help identify those individuals at
higher risk for invasive/metastatic diseases.
|
Introduction
|
|---|
E-cadherin, one of the classic cadherins, plays a major role in
the establishment and maintenance of intercellular adhesion, cell
polarity, and tissue architecture (1)
. Epithelia are
essential and abundant tissues in most eukaryotic organs; >90% of the
malignant human tumors are derived from epithelia. Abnormalities in the
expression and cellular localization of E-cadherin are frequently
associated with high tumor grade, infiltrative growth, and lymph node
metastasis in a variety of human malignancies (2, 3, 4, 5, 6)
.
Compelling experimental evidence indicates that E-cadherin serves as a
potent invasion suppressor gene (7
, 8)
. In addition, a
tumor suppressor effect of E-cadherin has been suggested in human
cancer (9
, 10) . Dysfunction of E-cadherin has also been
associated with a number of nonmalignant diseases such as ulcerative
and Crohn’s colitis, Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis, endometriosis,
and autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (11, 12, 13)
.
Genetic factors contribute to virtually every human disease, conferring
susceptibility or resistance, or influencing interaction with
environmental factors (14)
. The most common type of human
genetic variation is
SNP,3
which occurs about once in every 1000 bases of the 3 billion bases in
the human genome; some of those occurring in the promoter have been
shown to produce profound effects on the transcription of its gene
(15)
. We hypothesize that polymorphism in the promoter
region of the E-cadherin gene is responsible for
interindividual variation in the production of E-cadherin and in turn
leads to individual susceptibility to invasive/metastatic carcinoma and
other epithelial dysfunctions. We therefore screened the proximal
promoter of the E-cadherin gene in search of common genetic
variants with distinct effects on the transcriptional activity of the
gene. Here we report a C/A SNP at position -160 relative to the
transcription start site in the E-cadherin promoter that
alters transcription factor binding and promoter strength.
|
Materials and Methods
|
|---|
DNA Analysis.
For sequencing of the promoter region of the E-cadherin
gene, a 454-bp fragment of the proximal promoter spanning from position
-277 to +177 was amplified by PCR using primer E-cad S1 and E-cad S2
(Table 1)
. The PCR products were sequenced on an ABI sequencer with Dye
Terminators (Applied Biosystems) using both upstream and downstream
primers. For RFLP analysis, DNA was amplified using primer E-cad 5' and
E-cad 3' (Table 1)
. PCR products were digested with either
HphI or AflIII. The digestion reactions were
fractioned on a 4% agarose gel. The C allele created an
HphI site, and the A allele created an
AflIII site.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Sequences of oligonucleotides synthesized for PCR, EMSA probe, and
competitors
The human E-cadherin gene promoter sequence between -186
and -147 relative to the transcription start site is shown in the
upper row. The polymorphic site is in bold type and underlined.
|
|
Generation of Luciferase-Reporter Constructs and Transfection.
DNA was amplified with primer E-cad KpnI and E-cad
BglII, each of them had a KpnI and
BglII site introduced to the 5' end, respectively. The
C allele and the A allele were amplified from
human PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell line DNA samples,
respectively. The PCR products were digested with KpnI and
BglII and then cloned into promoterless pGL3 Enhancer vector
(Promega). The vector containing either C alleles or
A alleles were designated as pGL3-C or pGL3-A, respectively.
Plasmid DNA was obtained by transforming the vector into JM 109 cells
and subsequent large-scale plasmid preparation using Qiafilter Plasmid
Maxi kit (Qiagen). Reporter constructs were sequenced prior to use in
reporter assays.
The human prostate cancer cell line DU145 was plated into a 24-well
culture plate at a density of 5 x 104
cells/well and grown overnight to 60% confluence. In each experiment,
three different luciferase reporter plasmids were transfected:
(a) pGL3-C; (b) pGL3-A; and (c)
pGL3-Control (Promega), which contains SV40 promoter and enhancer
sequences. The DNA mixture for transfection was composed of test
plasmid (0.75 µg) and pSV-ß-galactosidase Control vector (Promega;
0.04 µg) that served as internal control to normalize activities of
luciferase. Transfection was carried out using the calcium phosphate
method. Luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer (Model
TD-20/20; Promega), and the ß-galactosidase activity was measured in
a plate reader. To correct for transfection efficiency, light units
from the luciferase assay were divided by the absorbance reading
from the ß-galactosidase assay. The corrected E-cadherin
promoter-driven luciferase activity is expressed as a percentage of the
pGL3-Control SV40 promoter-driven luciferase activity that served as
the positive control in every transfection experiment. Luciferase
activity was expressed as relative luciferase units. The promoterless
pGL3-basic vector (Promega) lacking promoter and enhancer was used as a
negative control in each of the transfection experiments. Statistics
were performed using Student’s unpaired two-tailed t test.
EMSA.
Complementary oligonucleotide pairs corresponding to human
E-cadherin gene promoter sequence (from -175 to -147) were
synthesized (UCSF Biomolecular Resource Center). Each of the
oligonucleotide pairs was annealed and purified on a 6% polyacrylamide
gel. The oligonucleotides were labeled with [
-32P]ATP.
A 1-µl (50,000 cpm) sample of 32P-labeled probe was
incubated with 5 µg of HeLa nuclear extract (New England Biolabs) for
20 min at room temperature. Protein-DNA binding specificity was tested
by competition assays in which the binding reactions were preincubated
with 10- to 50-fold excess of unlabeled specific or nonspecific
competitor duplex oligonucleotides prior to the addition of the labeled
probe. After binding, the protein-DNA complexes were resolved by
electrophoresis in 4% nondenaturing acrylamide gels. The gels were
dried prior to autoradiography.
DNase I Footprinting.
DNase I footprinting was performed with a Sure Track Footprinting kit
(Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer’s
instructions. To prepare the probe for footprinting, a 282-bp fragment
(between -234 and +48) of E-cadherin promoter was cut from
pGL3-C and pGL3-A vector with BstBI and BglII and
was uniquely radiolabeled at the upstream end by filling recessed 3'
termini with [
-32P]deoxy-CTP using DNA polymerase I.
DNA probes (10–20 fmol) were incubated with 0–160 µg of HeLa
nuclear extract, 1x binding buffer (8% glycerol, 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 100 mM NaCl, 5 mM
MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT) and 1 µg
poly(deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic acid) ·
(deoxyinosinic-deoxycytidylic acid) in a 50-µl reaction for 30 min at
room temperature. After binding, 5 µl of
Ca2+/Mg2+ solution (containing 5 mM
CaCl2 and 10 mM MgCl2) was added to
each reaction and followed by DNase I digestion for 1 min at room
temperature. The reaction was stopped by adding 40 µl of DNase stop
solution (192 mM sodium acetate, 32 mM EDTA,
0.14% SDS, and 64 µg/ml yeast RNA), extracted in
phenol:chloroform, and precipitated in ethanol. The dried DNAs were
suspended in formamide loading dye and resolved on a 6% denaturing
sequencing gel. At the same time, two G+A ladders were prepared by
using probe C and probe A, respectively, and loaded along with the
footprinting reaction. The gel was dried and visualized by
autoradiography.
|
Results
|
|---|
Identification of a Polymorphism Site at -160 of E-cadherin
Promoter.
We screened a 454-bp region (between -277 and +177) of the
E-cadherin proximal promoter and part of exon 1 by
sequencing seven human prostate cell line DNA samples and found a C/A
polymorphism site at position -160 relative to the transcriptional
start site (dbSNP accession number, ss18684; Fig. 1
). No additional polymorphisms or other genetic variations were detected.
View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. E-cadherin -160 C/A polymorphism.
A, sequencing chromogram. *, the polymorphic site.
B, RFLP patterns: C/A, individual heterozygous;
A/A, individual homozygous for A allele;
C/C, homozygous for C allele; u, uncut
PCR product; a, PCR products cut with AflIII;
h, PCR products cut with HphI; M,
100-bp DNA marker.
|
|
Effects of the -160 Polymorphism on Promoter Activity.
To examine the potential effects of the -160 C/A polymorphism on
E-cadherin gene transcription, a 413-bp promoter of
E-cadherin gene (-365 to +48) carrying either the
C or A allele was inserted upstream of the
luciferase gene in the pGL3 promoterless enhancer plasmid vector. The
activity of E-cadherin C/A promoter-luciferase reporter gene
constructs were assessed in transient transfection assays in DU145
human prostate cancer cells. Triplicate experiments were performed
using DNA from different plasmid preparations. As shown in Fig. 2
, significantly lower luciferase activities were observed for the pGL-A
construct as compared with the pGL-C construct (a 68% decrease;
P < 0.001).
View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Transient transfection assay to measure promoter activity
of C and A alleles in DU145 cells. A,
schematic of the human E-cadherin promoter. B,
the human E-cadherin gene promoter corresponding to
positions -365 to +48 relative to the transcription initiation site
(+1) was cloned from PC3 and LNCaP prostate cancer cell lines upstream
of the luciferase reporter gene in plasmid pGL3 enhancer in the 5' to
3' orientation. Each allele luciferase reporter gene construct was
transiently transfected into DU145 prostate cancer cells. Data were
normalized to ß-galactosidase activity and are expressed as a
percentage of the corrected luciferase activity of pGL3-control (means
of three independent experiments; bars, SE).
|
|
Allele-specific Binding of Nuclear Proteins to the -160
Polymorphic Site.
To understand the mechanism by which the polymorphic alleles produced
different promoter strengths, two synthetic double-stranded DNA probes,
designated EC and EA (-175 to -147) were subjected to EMSA. EC
corresponds the C allele, and EA corresponds the
A allele. The sequences of the oligonucleotides used as
probes and competitor in the EMSA analysis are shown in Table 1
. Two
DNA-protein complexes as indicated in Fig. 3
were observed. Complex I was evident in Lanes 2, 7, and
8 but was almost invisible in the corresponding binding
reactions with probe EA. Complex II, the major DNA-protein binding
complex, was evident in both binding reactions with probe EC and EA
(Lanes 2, 7, 10, and 15) but was more abundant
with probe EC (Fig. 3)
.
View larger version (56K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 3. EMSA with HeLa cell extracts and oligonucleotide probes
containing C and A alleles of human
E-cadherin gene promoter. Each binding reaction contained 5
µg of nuclear protein and labeled EC (Lanes 2–8) or EA
(Lanes 10–16) oligonucleotide probe. Excess unlabeled EC or
EA oligonucleotides (10-, 20-, and 50-fold) were included in the
binding reactions as competitor in Lanes 3–6 and
Lanes 11–14. In addition, 50-fold excess of unlabeled EA
and EC oligonucleotides were used to compete with probes EC (Lane
8) and EA (Lane 16). Fifty-fold excess of nonspecific
competitor EN was used in Lane 7 and Lane 15.
Arrowheads, specific retarded complexes, I and II. The free
probe is shown at the bottom of each lane.
|
|
To verify the specificity of DNA-protein complexes, competition assays
using specific and nonspecific oligonucleotides were performed (Fig. 3)
. The binding was inhibited competitively by adding specific
competitive oligonucleotides (Lanes 3–6 and
11–14) but not by a nonspecific competitor (Lanes
7 and 15). When the oligonucleotide EC was used as a
competitor with probe EA, it completely disrupted complexes I and II
(Lane 16). However, when oligonucleotide EA was used as a
competitor with probe EC, the disruption of DNA-protein complexes was
not as effective as oligonucleotides EC with probe EA (Lane
16) or with probe EC (Fig. 3
, Lanes 3–6).
To further define the binding site of the potential transcription
factor suggested by EMSA analysis, the region surrounding the
polymorphic site was also examined by DNase I footprinting analysis. A
284-bp DNA fragment containing the human E-cadherin gene
promoter sequence between -234 and +48 was used as a template in DNase
I protection assays with HeLa nuclear extract (Fig. 4)
. A footprint was clearly visible from -164 to -157 with the Ecad-C
probe. The appearance of the protected regions on the DNA template was
dependent on the concentration of nuclear protein in each DNase I
digestion and became more visible in the presence of an increasing
amount of proteins (Fig. 4
, compare Lane 2 with Lane
5). The specific bases protected were identified by alignment with
modified Gilbert-Maxim G+A sequencing reaction run in parallel and are
indicated by the sequences shown at the side of the gel in Fig. 4
. No
protection of this region could be detected with probe Ecad-A (Fig. 4)
.
View larger version (91K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. The effects of the C/A polymorphism on footprints in
DNase I footprinting assays. The polymorphic site from the C
allele (positions -164 to -157) is protected from digestion by DNase
I in the presence of HeLa nuclear extracts. The position of the
protected regions is indicated with a box, and the actual
bases are shown at the side of the gel. Lane 1,
Ecad-C template digested in the absence of nuclear proteins;
Lanes 2–5, Ecad-C template digested in the presence of 15,
20, and 25 µg of nuclear protein, respectively; Lane 6,
Ecad-A template digested in the absence of nuclear protein; Lanes
7–10, Ecad-A template digested in the presence of 15, 20, and 25
µg of nuclear protein, respectively. Lane M, G+A ladder.
|
|
|
Discussion
|
|---|
In the present study, we have screened the proximal promoter
region of the human E-cadherin gene for sequence variants
and identified a common SNP at position -160 from the transcriptional
start site. Previous studies have shown that a fragment spanning -399
to +31 relative to the transcription start site of the human
E-cadherin gene possesses basal promoter activity (16
, 17)
; thus, we focused our screening on this region. Several
major cis-acting elements have been identified within a
short section of the proximal promoter. Among these are the two E
boxes, a CAAT box, and a SP1 binding site (17)
. Our
results demonstrate that the polymorphism at position -160 has a
significant effect on transcriptional activity in transient
transfection studies. The molecular mechanism of this difference may
well be explained as the difference in affinity of the DNA-binding
protein(s) to the two allelic forms of the E-cadherin
promoters. Our footprinting data clearly show that this region from
-164 to -157 is protected by nuclear protein(s) from DNase I
digestion. At least two proteins are involved in forming DNA-protein
complexes, as evidenced by the EMSA assays in which two specific
DNA-protein complexes were observed. We have searched the
transcriptional factor database using
TRANSFAC,4
and there are no known transcriptional factor binding sites that have
homology to the sequence around the C/A polymorphism site of the human
E-cadherin gene promoter. Most likely, this polymorphic site
is a binding site for unknown transcription factors that are required
for the E-cadherin promoter to function at an adequate
level. The decreased transcriptional activity observed in DU145 cells
transfected with plasmid carrying the A allele may be
explained as the result of structure differences between the
A and the C alleles, which hinders access of DNA
by transcription factors. However, the change of a cytosine to an
adenosine in the DNA structure does not abandon the binding completely.
A loose binding may still occur, as evidenced by the EMSA assays in
which a probe containing the C allele produced more abundant
DNA-protein complexes than a probe containing the A allele.
In addition, when an oligonucleotide containing the C allele
was used to compete with a probe containing the A allele, it
totally disrupted probe binding with nuclear protein. However, when an
oligonucleotide containing the A allele was used to compete
with a probe containing the C allele, it was not as
effective as an oligonucleotide containing the C allele in
disrupting probe binding with nuclear proteins. It is clear that the
sequence containing the C allele will have strong binding
activities with transcriptional factors, leading to high
transcriptional activities. This difference suggests that binding
affinity of protein with DNA may be the basis for the observed
differences in transcriptional activity of the two alleles.
In summary, the -160 C/A polymorphism, located within the regulatory
region of E-cadherin promoter, influences
E-cadherin transcription by altering transcription factor
binding. This SNP could have significant effects on the susceptibility
or vulnerability to develop carcinoma and subsequently invasiveness and
metastasis of carcinoma. This hypothesis is currently being tested in
common human carcinomas.
|
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 This study was supported by NIH Grants DK-47517,
CA-64872, AG-16870, and DK-52708; VA/DOD and VA REAP awards, and the
VA Merit Review (to R. D.). 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Urology Research Center (112F), 4150 Clement Street, San
Francisco, CA 94121. Phone: (415) 750-6964; Fax: (415) 750-6639;
E-mail: urologylab{at}aol.com
3 The abbreviations used are: SNP, single
nucleotide polymorphism; EMSA, electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
4 Internet address:
http://transfac.gbf.de/TRANSFAC/programs.html.
Received 11/22/99.
Accepted 1/ 4/00.
|
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Takeichi M. Cadherin cell adhesion receptors as a morphogenetic regulator. Science (Washington DC), 251: 1451-1455, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Umbas R., Schalken J. A., Aalders T. W., Carter B. S., Karthaus H. F., Schaafsma H. E., Debruyne F. M., Isaacs W. B. Expression of the cellular adhesion molecule E-cadherin is reduced or absent in high-grade prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 52: 5104-5109, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gamallo C., Palacios J., Suarez A., Pizarro A., Navarro P., Quintanilla M., Cano A. Correlation of E-cadherin expression with differentiation grade and histological type in breast carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol., 142: 987-993, 1993.[Abstract]
-
Pignatelli M., Ansari T. W., Gunter P., Liu D., Hirano S., Takeichi M., Kloppel G., Lemoine N. R. Loss of membranous E-cadherin expression in pancreatic cancer: correlation with lymph node metastasis, high grade, and advanced stage. J. Pathol., 174: 243-248, 1994.[Medline]
-
Mayer B., Johnson J. P., Leitl F., Jauch K. W., Heiss M. M., Schildberg F. W., Birchmeier W., Funke I. E-cadherin expression in primary and metastatic gastric cancer: down-regulation correlates with cellular dedifferentiation and glandular disintegration. Cancer Res., 53: 1690-1695, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kinsella A. R., Lepts G. C., Hill C. L., Jones M. Reduced E-cadherin expression correlates with increased invasiveness in colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 12: 335-342, 1994.[Medline]
-
Frixen U. H., Behrens J., Sachs M., Eberle G., Voss B., Warda A., Lochner D., Birchmeier W. E-cadherin-mediated cell-cell adhesion prevents invasiveness of human carcinoma cells. J. Cell Biol., 113: 173-185, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Efstathiou J. A., Liu D., Wheeler J. M., Kim H. C., Beck N. E., Ilyas M., Karayiannakis A. J., Mortensen N. J., Kmiot W., Playford R. J., Pignatelli M., Bodmer W. F. Mutated epithelial cadherin is associated with increased tumorigenicity and loss of adhesion and of responsiveness to the motogenic trefoil factor 2 in colon carcinoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 2316-2321, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Berx G., Cleton-Jansen A. M., Nollet F., de Leeuw W. J., van de Vijver M., Cornelisse C., van Roy F. E-cadherin is a tumour/invasion suppressor gene mutated in human lobular breast cancers. EMBO J., 14: 6107-6115, 1995.[Medline]
-
Richards F. M., McKee S. A., Rajpar M. H., Cole T. R., Evans D. G., Jankowski J. A., McKeown C., Sanders D. S., Maher E. R. Germline E-cadherin gene (CDH1) mutations predispose to familial gastric cancer and colorectal cancer. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 607-610, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jankowski J. A., Bedford F. K., Boulton R. A., Cruickshank N., Hall C., Elder J., Allan R., Forbes A., Kim Y. S., Wright N. A., Sanders D. S. Alterations in classical cadherins associated with progression in ulcerative and Crohn’s colitis. Lab Investig., 78: 1155-1167, 1998.[Medline]
-
Geissmann F., Emile J. F., Andry P., Thomas C., Fraitag S., De Prost Y., Brousse N. Lack of expression of E-cadherin is associated with dissemination of Langerhans’ cell histiocytosis and poor outcome. J. Pathol., 181: 301-304, 1997.[Medline]
-
Gaetje R., Kotzian S., Herrmann G., Baumann R., Starzinski-Powitz A. Nonmalignant epithelial cells, potentially invasive in human endometriosis, lack the tumor suppressor molecule E-cadherin. Am. J. Pathol., 150: 461-467, 1997.[Abstract]
-
Collins F. S., Guyer M. S., Charkravarti A. Variations on a theme: cataloging human DNA sequence variation. Science (Washington DC), 278: 1580-1581, 1997.[Free Full Text]
-
Hagmann M. Human genome. A good SNP may be hard to find. Science (Washington DC), 285: 21-22, 1999.
-
Bussemakers M. J., Giroldi L. A., van Bokhoven A., Schalken J. A. Transcriptional regulation of the human E-cadherin gene in human prostate cancer cell lines: characterization of the human E-cadherin gene promoter. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 203: 1284-1290, 1994.[Medline]
-
Giroldi L. A., Bringuier P. P., de Weijert M., Jansen C., van Bokhoven A., Schalken J. A. Role of E boxes in the repression of E-cadherin expression. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 241: 453-458, 1997.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
|
|
 
B. Zhang, K. Pan, Z. Liu, J. Zhou, L. Gu, J. Ji, J. Ma, W.-c. You, and D. Deng
Genetic Polymorphisms of the E-Cadherin Promoter and Risk of Sporadic Gastric Carcinoma in Chinese Populations
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.,
September 1, 2008;
17(9):
2402 - 2408.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G.-Y. Wang, C.-Q. Lu, R.-M. Zhang, X.-H. Hu, and Z. W. Luo
The E-cadherin Gene Polymorphism 160C->A and Cancer Risk: A HuGE Review and Meta-Analysis of 26 Case-Control Studies
Am. J. Epidemiol.,
January 1, 2008;
167(1):
7 - 14.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. C. Reinhold, M. A. Reimers, A. K. Maunakea, S. Kim, S. Lababidi, U. Scherf, U. T. Shankavaram, M. S. Ziegler, C. Stewart, H. Kouros-Mehr, et al.
Detailed DNA methylation profiles of the E-cadherin promoter in the NCI-60 cancer cells
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
February 1, 2007;
6(2):
391 - 403.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Healy, H. Belanger, P. Beaulieu, M. Lariviere, D. Labuda, and D. Sinnett
Promoter SNPs in G1/S checkpoint regulators and their impact on the susceptibility to childhood leukemia
Blood,
January 15, 2007;
109(2):
683 - 692.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. Oliveira, R. Seruca, and F. Carneiro
Genetics, Pathology, and Clinics of Familial Gastric Cancer
International Journal of Surgical Pathology,
January 1, 2006;
14(1):
21 - 33.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Belanger, P. Beaulieu, C. Moreau, D. Labuda, T. J. Hudson, and D. Sinnett
Functional promoter SNPs in cell cycle checkpoint genes
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
September 15, 2005;
14(18):
2641 - 2648.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kamoto, Y. Isogawa, Y. Shimizu, S. Minamiguchi, H. Kinoshita, Y. Kakehi, K. Mitsumori, S. Yamamoto, T. Habuchi, T. Kato, et al.
Association of a Genetic Polymorphism of the E-cadherin Gene with Prostate Cancer in a Japanese Population
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2005;
35(3):
158 - 161.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Shin, I.-J. Kim, H. C. Kang, J.-H. Park, H.-W. Park, S.-G. Jang, M. R. Lee, S.-Y. Jeong, H. J. Chang, J.-L. Ku, et al.
A functional polymorphism (-347 G->GA) in the E-cadherin gene is associated with colorectal cancer
Carcinogenesis,
November 1, 2004;
25(11):
2173 - 2176.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
M D Crabtree, C Fletcher, M Churchman, S V Hodgson, K Neale, R K S Phillips, and I P M Tomlinson
Analysis of candidate modifier loci for the severity of colonic familial adenomatous polyposis, with evidence for the importance of the N-acetyl transferases
Gut,
February 1, 2004;
53(2):
271 - 276.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Suriano, C. Oliveira, P. Ferreira, J. C. Machado, M. C. Bordin, O. De Wever, E. A. Bruyneel, N. Moguilevsky, N. Grehan, T. R. Porter, et al.
Identification of CDH1 germline missense mutations associated with functional inactivation of the E-cadherin protein in young gastric cancer probands
Hum. Mol. Genet.,
March 1, 2003;
12(5):
575 - 582.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Wang, J.-P. Song, M. Ikeda, K. Shinmura, J. Yokota, and H. Sugimura
Ile-Leu Substitution (I415L) in Germline E-cadherin Gene (CDH1) in Japanese Familial Gastric Cancer
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
January 1, 2003;
33(1):
17 - 20.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Matsumura, R. Makino, and K. Mitamura
Frequent Down-Regulation of E-cadherin by Genetic and Epigenetic Changes in the Malignant Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinomas
Clin. Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2001;
7(3):
594 - 599.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. D. Bigby
The Leukotriene C4 Synthase Gene and Asthma
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol.,
September 1, 2000;
23(3):
273 - 276.
[Full Text]
|
|
|
Top
ABSTRACT
Introduction
