
[Cancer Research 60, 908-915, February 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Genotoxic Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon ortho-Quinones Generated by Aldo-Keto Reductases Induce CYP1A1 via Nuclear Translocation of the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor1
Michael E. Burczynski and
Trevor M. Penning2
Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6084
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Procarcinogenic polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) induce
their own metabolism and activation by binding to the cytosolic aryl
hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), which then translocates to the nucleus and
activates CYP1A1 gene transcription via xenobiotic response
elements (XREs). Although the AhR demonstrates a strict specificity for
planar aromatics, nonplanar
(±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene
also induced CYP1A1 expression in HepG2 cells over a
delayed timecourse (
612 h), suggesting a requirement for
(±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene
metabolism. Aldo-keto reductase (AKR) inhibitors blocked this effect,
suggesting that benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dione (BPQ), a planar
PAH o-quinone generated by AKRs, was the downstream
inducer. BPQ was found to be a potent and rapid inducer of CYP1A1, with
an EC50 value in HepG2 cells identical to that of the
parent benzo(a)pyrene. BPQ was a more potent inducer of
CYP1A1 when compared with the 1,6-, 3,6-, and
6,12-benzo(a)pyrene-diones. Multiple PAH
o-quinones caused induction of CYP1A1, demonstrating that
this was a general property of AKR-generated PAH
o-quinones. HepG2-101L cells stably transfected with a
XRE-luciferase construct showed that BPQ activated CYP1A1
transcription via a XRE-dependent mechanism. BPQ failed to induce
CYP1A1 in AhR-deficient and AhR nuclear translocator-deficient murine
hepatoma cell lines and confirmed that induction of CYP1A1 was AhR and
AhR nuclear translocator-dependent. Electrophoretic mobility shift
assays demonstrated the specific appearance of BPQ-activated AhR in the
nucleus, and immunofluorescence studies confirmed that BPQ mediated
nuclear translocation of the AhR. Classical bifunctional inducers
elevate CYP1A1 expression via a XRE and are subsequently
converted by CYP1A1 to electrophiles that induce phase II enzymes via
an electrophilic response element/antioxidant response element. PAH
o-quinones represent a novel class of bifunctional inducer
because they are electrophiles produced by phase II enzymes that
simultaneously induce phase I enzymes via a XRE and phase II enzymes
via a electrophilic response element/antioxidant response element (see
also M. E. Burczynski et al., Cancer Res.,
59: 607614, 1999). This study shows that the AhR provides
the only known mechanism by which genotoxic PAH o-quinones
generated in the cytosol can be targeted to the nucleus with
specificity.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
PAHs3
(B(a)P, for example) are ubiquitous environmental
procarcinogens that require metabolic activation to exert their
carcinogenic effects (1, 2, 3)
. A major pathway of PAH
metabolic activation proceeds through the CYP-mediated generation of
PAH trans-dihydrodiol proximate carcinogens
(4)
. Once formed, PAH trans-dihydrodiols can
undergo further oxidative metabolism to reactive electrophiles via two
distinct enzymatic pathways (Fig. 1)
.
In the first pathway, human CYPs catalyze a secondary epoxidation
vicinal to the trans-dihydrodiol to yield bay region
diol-epoxides (4
, 5) . These diol-epoxides are protected
from hydrolysis by epoxide hydrolase due to steric hindrance in the bay
region (6)
. Their resistance to hydrolyation may permit
them to reach the nucleus from their site of formation, although the
exact process whereby diol-epoxides access the nucleus is not known.
PAH diol-epoxides are well-characterized metabolites that react readily
with mutational hot spots in DNA to form stable adducts both in
vitro and in vivo (7
, 8)
. If unrepaired,
anti-BPDE-DNA adducts result in misreplication and
mutagenesis (9
, 10)
.
A second pathway of PAH activation is catalyzed by AKRs (11
, 12) . The AKRs are monomeric cytosolic NADP(H)-dependent
oxidoreductases (
34 kDa), and several human isoforms
(AKR1C1AKR1C4) catalyze the oxidation of PAH
trans-dihydrodiols to PAH o-quinones
(12, 13)
.4
In the case of B(a)P, the proximate carcinogen
B(a)P-diol is converted by AKRs to BPQ. PAH
o-quinones are electrophilic metabolites that enter futile
redox cycles and amplify ROS multiple times (15)
. PAH
o-quinones are formed in rat hepatocytes by AKR1C9 and are
both cytotoxic and genotoxic in vitro (16
, 17)
.
These quinones form stable and depurinating adducts with DNA, and their
propensity to redox cycle could lead to oxidative damage of DNA
(e.g., formation of 8'-hydroxy-2-deoxyguanosine, strand
scission, and base propenals; Refs. (18, 19, 20)
. PAH
o-quinones are gen-erated by AKRs in the cytosolic
compartment, and how PAH o-quinones gain access to the
nucleus is presently unknown. In disposition studies in primary rat
hepatocytes, a significant amount of 20 µM
[3H]BPQ (30%) was sequestered into the cell pellet (DNA,
RNA, and protein) within 0.5 h (17)
. Treatment of
primary rat hepatocytes with these toxicological concentrations of BPQ
results in extensive strand scission of the genomic DNA. These data
suggest that BPQ generated in the cytosol, like anti-BPDE
formed in the microsomes, can reach the nucleus.
PAHs are considered bifunctional inducers: they enhance the expression
of both the CYPs and phase II (de)toxification enzymes (including the
AKRs) through two distinct mechanisms (21)
. In the first
mechanism, PAHs bind directly to a cytosolic receptor termed the AhR
that demonstrates a strict specificity for planar aromatic compounds
(22)
. Upon binding ligand, the cytosolic AhR dissociates
from heat shock protein 90 and is rapidly translocated into the
nucleus, where it forms a complex with its heterodimeric partner, ARNT.
The ligand-bound AhR/ARNT complex then robustly activates the
expression of a battery of genes containing XREs within their
regulatory regions, including CYP1A1 (for reviews, see Refs. 23
and 24
; Fig. 2
).
In the second mechanism, PAHs are activated by CYP1A1 metabolism to
unidentified electrophiles. These electrophilic intermediates signal by
an incompletely characterized mechanism to activate components
(possibly activator protein 1 and/or the Nrf2/maf families of
transcription factors) to bind and activate transcription from response
elements termed AREs or EpREs present in the regulatory regions of
responsive genes encoding phase II (de)toxification enzymes (Refs. 25, 26, 27, 28
, for a review, see Ref. 29
). BPQ is formed in human hepatoma
(HepG2) cells by AKR1C1 and autoregulates AKR1C1 expression,
most likely via an ARE/EpRE-like mechanism (30)
.
The present studies sought to determine whether downstream
electrophilic metabolites of PAH might also feedback stimulate the
expression of the CYP1A1 gene. In HepG2 cells,
B(a)P-diol robustly enhanced CYP1A1 mRNA levels with delayed
kinetics, implying that a downstream metabolite of
B(a)P-diol was the actual CYP inducer. Subsequent studies
identified PAH o-quinones generated by human AKRs as the
inducers. PAH o-quinones induce CYP1A1 via the AhR signaling
pathway, demonstrating that these electrophilic metabolites represent
novel bifunctional inducers that require no further metabolism to
simultaneously induce both phase II (de)toxification enzymes (via an
EpRE/ARE due to their electrophilic/redox-active nature) and phase I
activating enzymes (via the XRE due to their restored planarity). These
studies also imply that the cytosolic colocalization of AKR enzymes and
the AhR provides a mechanism whereby PAH o-quinones
generated in the cytosol can be targeted to the nucleus with
specificity. The nuclear targeting of these redox-active
o-quinones by the AhR may contribute to the spectrum of
oxidative DNA damage observed after exposure of cells to PAH.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Chemicals and Reagents
Cell culture media and reagents were obtained from Life Technologies,
Inc. (Gaithersburg, MD). The Dual Luciferase Reporter Assay System was
obtained from Promega Corp. (Madison, WI). Polyclonal rabbit
anti-murine AhR antisera was purchased from Biomol (Plymouth Meeting,
PA). B(a)P, benz(a)anthracene,
7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene, 6MPA, and ursodeoxycholic
acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI).
NPQ and BPQ were synthesized according to previously published
procedures (31
, 32)
. BAQ and DMBAQ were gifts from Dr.
Ronald G. Harvey (Ben May Institute, University of Chicago, Chicago,
IL). TCDD, B(a)P-diol, B(a)P-1,6-dione,
B(a)P-3,6-dione, and B(a)P-6,12-dione were obtained from the
National Cancer Institute Midwest Research Institute (Kansas City, MO).
All other chemicals used were of the highest grade available. All PAHs
are potentially hazardous and should be handled in accordance with NIH
Guidelines for the Laboratory Use of Chemical Carcinogens.
Cell Culture
HepG2 hepatoma cells (passages 520) were maintained in Eagles MEM
supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum and 100
units/ml penicillin/streptomycin solution. Hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and
hepa1c1c12 cells (kindly provided by Dr. Oliver Hankinson, University
of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) were maintained in
-MEM
(without nucleosides) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal
bovine serum, 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin, and 2.5 µg/ml
fungizone solution (Irvine Scientific, Santa Anna, CA). HepG2-101L
cells stably expressing a portion of the CYP1A1 gene
promoter (-1612/+292) that bears three consensus XREs (a kind gift
from Dr. Robert H. Tukey, University of California, San Diego, La
Jolla, CA) linked to a luciferase reporter were maintained in
DMEM (with low glucose) supplemented with 5% non-heat-inactivated FCS,
5% non-heat-inactivated NuSerum IV, and 0.4 mg/ml G418 to maintain
selection. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere
containing 5% CO2 and passaged every 5 days at a 1:20
dilution (HepG2, hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and hepa1c1c12 cell lines) or
every 7 days at a 1:4 dilution (HepG2-101L). To measure either the
induction of CYP1A1 RNA or the nuclear translocation of the AhR by
electrophoretic mobility shift assays, 48 h before treatment,
3 x 106 hepatoma cells were seeded into
10-cm dishes containing fresh media. Two days later (
6070%
confluence), cells were exposed to the various inducers. Aliquots (100
µl) of 100 x stock solutions in DMSO were added to 10
ml of fresh culture medium, and cells were incubated for the indicated
times before harvesting. For XRE-luciferase reporter gene assays,
24 h before treatment, 1 x 106 cells
were seeded into 6-well plates. One day later (7080% confluence),
cells were treated with the various inducers 12 h before
harvesting.
RNA Isolation and Northern Analysis
Cellular RNA was isolated using the Trizol reagent. Total RNA (10 µg)
was separated by electrophoresis on 1.0% agarose/formaldehyde gels and
transferred overnight to Duralon-UV membranes (Stratagene, La Jolla,
CA). Membranes were prehybridized in hybridization buffer (30%
formamide, 10% dextran sulfate, 1 M NaCl, and 1% SDS)
with 100 µg/ml sheared salmon sperm DNA at 42°C for 2 h. After
prehybridization, membranes were hybridized to 107 dpm of
[
-32P]dATP probes corresponding to either:
(a) a 1-kb EcoRI fragment of the human CYP450 1A1
3' untranslated region (phP1-450-3', ATCC 57259); (b) a 1-kb
EcoRI fragment of the murine CYP450 1A1 (pMP1-450-3', ATCC
63006); or (c) an 855-bp EcoRI fragment of human
colon AKR1C1(hcDD/DD1) cDNA (kindly provided by Dr. Paul Ciaccio and
Dr. Ken Tew, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA) that were
labeled by random priming to a specific activity of greater than
109 cpm/µg DNA. Hybridization was performed at 42°C for
1624 h. After hybridization, blots were subjected to two
high-stringency washes with 0.1x SSC plus 1% SDS at 60°C for 45 min
and 30 min, respectively. Signal intensities were measured using the
PhosphorImager system (Molecular Dynamics), and blots were exposed to
X-ray film at -80°C overnight. For purposes of normalization, blots
were stripped and reprobed with a 780-bp
PstI/XbaI fragment of human GAPDH labeled by
random priming as described above.
Luciferase Reporter Assays
The luciferase assay was carried out using the Dual Luciferase Reporter
Assay system from Promega. At the end of the treatment period,
HepG2-101L cells were rinsed twice in ice-cold PBS and then incubated
in 1 ml of 1x passive lysis buffer for 15 min on an orbital shaker at
room temperature. Lysates were centrifuged for 30 s at
14,000 rpm in a microfuge, and aliquots of the cleared lysates were
assayed immediately or stored at -70°C. The luciferase assay was
carried out using 20 µl of cell lysate and 100 µl of Luciferase
Assay Reagent II as provided. The light emitted was measured for
10 s using a Berthold Lumat LB-9501 luminometer. To normalize for
protein present in the stable transfectant cell lysates, quantitation
of protein content was performed on 100-µl aliquots of the cell
lysate using the Bradford reagent (Biorad, Hercules, CA). All assays
were found to be in the linear range versus time and protein
concentration.
Nuclear Extract Preparation
Nuclear extracts were prepared by the method of Dignam as described in
Ausubel et al. (33)
, with minor modifications.
After harvesting, cells were resuspended in hypotonic lysis buffer [10
mM HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 1.5 mM
MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 0.5 mM DTT, and
0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride] and centrifuged at
3,000 rpm for 5 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in hypotonic lysis
buffer and disrupted with 10 strokes in a Dounce homogenizer (>90%
lysis by trypan blue exclusion). Nuclei were pelleted at 14,000 rpm for
30 min and then resuspended in 0.5x packed nuclear volume of (low
salt) nuclear extraction buffer [20 mM HEPES (pH 7.9)
containing 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 mM
EDTA, 25% glycerol, 0.02 M KCl, 0.5 mM DTT,
and 0.2 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride). After dropwise
addition of an equal volume of nuclear extraction buffer containing
high salt (0.8 M KCl), samples were mixed on a tiltboard
for 30 min at 4°C. Samples were centrifuged at 14,000 x g for 30 s, and the supernatants (nuclear
extracts) were assayed immediately for protein content using the
Bradford reagent (Biorad) and used in subsequent electrophoretic
mobility shift assays.
Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay
Electrophoretic mobility shift assays were performed using a
double-stranded oligonucleotide containing a consensus XRE-binding site
from the CYP1A1 promoter corresponding to -998 to -969
(5'-dTTCTCCGGTCCTTCTCACGCAACGCCTGGGCA-3'
(italic letters correspond to the core XRE sequence) of the human
CYP1A1 gene (DRE-983, as described previously in Ref. 34
).
After annealing, the probes were labeled with
[
-32P]dATP using the Klenow fragment (to fill in extra
TT dinucleotide overhangs at either end of the annealed
double-stranded oligonucleotide) and then purified through Qiaquik
nucleotide removal columns (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Nuclear extracts (5
µg of protein) were incubated in binding buffer [25 mM
HEPES (pH 7.9) containing 100 mM KCl, 6.25 mM
MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 1
mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 10% glycerol] in
the presence of 2.5 µg of BSA, 0.2 µg of poly(dI-dC), and 50 fmol
of -32P-labeled XRE oligonucleotide (20,000 cpm) in a
total volume of 15 µl at room temperature for 30 min. The reaction
mixture was then subjected to electrophoresis through a 4.5%
polyacrylamide gel containing 1x TBE and 1% glycerol. The gels were
dried under a vacuum for autoradiography (overnight exposure) and
subsequent PhosphorImager analysis. For competition experiments,
nuclear extracts were incubated before the addition of labeled
oligonucleotide for 10 min at room temperature with an excess of
unlabeled oligonucleotides and then incubated in the binding reactions
described.
Cell Growth and Fixation for Immunofluorescence Microscopy
Hepa1c1c7 cells were detached by trypsinization and seeded into 60-mm
culture dishes containing sterile glass coverslips previously coated in
a solution of collagen (100 µg/ml) for 1 h. Cells were seeded at
30% confluence and allowed to attach overnight. The following day,
coverslips were washed with PBS at room temperature and then incubated
in 4% paraformaldehyde (pH 7.4) for 15 min. After three rinses in PBS,
coverslips were incubated in 0.05% Triton in PBS for 10 min.
Immunofluorescence Staining and Microscopy
Coverslips were blocked in 2% goat IgG in 0.05% Triton in PBS for 30
min. After aspiration, coverslips were incubated in a 1:50 dilution
of primary antibody solution (rabbit antimurine AhR) at room
temperature for 90 min. After three rinses in 1x PBS, coverslips were
incubated in a 1:1000 dilution of secondary antibody solution (goat
antirabbit IgG fluorescein conjugate) at room temperature for 90 min in
the dark. Coverslips were washed three times with 1x PBS and then
mounted onto glass slides in mounting media. Once dry, fluorescence was
observed with a Nikon Diaphot fluorescent microscope.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Delayed Induction of Human CYP1A1 Expression by
B(a)P-diol
Treatment of HepG2 cells with either 10 nM TCDD or 10
µM B(a)P (data not shown) led to a robust and
rapid induction of CYP1A1 mRNA within 13 h. When HepG2 cells were
treated with 10 µM B(a)P-diol, CYP1A1 mRNA was
not induced until 612 h (Fig. 3)
. The delayed but robust induction of CYP1A1 via B(a)P-diol
suggested that this metabolite either (a) induced
CYP1A1 expression via a novel mechanism or (b)
required activation to a downstream metabolite capable of inducing
CYP1A1 mRNA.

View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Delayed induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol.
HepG2 cells (3 x 106) were seeded into
10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD or
B(a)P-diol in DMSO were added to fresh media to yield final
concentrations of 10 nM (TCDD) or 10 µM
[B(a)P-diol] in 0.1% DMSO. After the appropriate time
points, total RNA was harvested, and 10 µg of RNA per lane were
electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and analyzed for
CYP1A1 expression as described in "Materials and
Methods." GAPDH reprobing (data not shown) revealed equal loading of
all lanes.
|
|
Inhibition of B[a]P-diol-induced CYP1A1
Expression by AKR Inhibitors
B(a)P-diol can be metabolized to either the diol-epoxide
anti-BPDE by human CYPs or to the ortho-quinone
BPQ by human AKRs. The recent discovery that AKR1C1 is constitutively
expressed in resting HepG2 cells, whereas CYP1A1 is not detectable
(30)
, suggested that AKR1C1-dependent oxidation of
B(a)P-diol to BPQ may be the requisite metabolic event
responsible for the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA by the proximate
carcinogen. To test this hypothesis, HepG2 cells were coincubated with
B(a)P-diol in the presence of two AKR1C1 inhibitors of
varying potency (Fig. 4)
. Both 6MPA and ursodeoxycholic acid inhibited the
B(a)P-diol-dependent induction of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells
with IC50 values that were higher but approach the
IC50 values observed for the inhibition of purified
recombinant AKR1C1 in vitro, respectively (Ref. 30 ; data not
shown). These data suggest that the AKR1C1-dependent oxidation of
B(a)P-diol to BPQ is the metabolic event responsible for the
induction of CYP1A1 in B(a)P-diol-treated HepG2 cells.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4. Inhibition of B(a)P-diol-induced
CYP1A1 expression by AKR inhibitors. HepG2 cells
(3 x 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes,
and 2 days later, stock solutions of ursodeoxycholate (top)
or 6MPA (bottom) were added to fresh media to yield
the appropriate final concentrations. After a 30-min preincubation with
AKR inhibitors, 5 µM B(a)P-diol was added to
the media. After 12 h, RNA was harvested, and 10 µg of RNA per
lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially
analyzed for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA, and signal intensities were
determined using the PhosphorImager system as described in "Materials
and Methods." Results for each concentration of inhibitor are
expressed as the percentage of control CYP1A1:GAPDH ratio
(i.e. after a 12-h incubation with 5 µM
B(a)P-diol in the absence of inhibitors). Mean ± SE of triplicate determinations is given.
|
|
CYP1A1 Induction Potencies of Various B(a)P Metabolites
in HepG2 Cells
To directly demonstrate that BPQ was capable of inducing CYP1A1 mRNA in
HepG2 cells, dose-response curves for B(a)P and its CYP- and
AKR-derived metabolites (B(a)P-diol, anti-BPDE,
and BPQ) were compared with the prototypical CYP1A1 inducer TCDD (Fig. 5)
. The ED50 for the TCDD-dependent induction of CYP1A1 mRNA in
HepG2 cells was approximately 1 nM. B(a)P and
BPQ were nearly equipotent in their ability to induce CYP1A1 mRNA
(ED50
1 µM), and both were less
efficacious than TCDD. Importantly both compounds produced a rapid
(
1 h) and robust induction of CYP1A1 mRNA, suggesting that neither
inducer required metabolism to an active species. The finding that
B(a)P is approximately 1000-fold less potent than the
nonmetabolizable inducer TCDD is consistent with previous reports
comparing TCDD and PAH (35)
. anti-BPDE was
incapable of inducing CYP1A1 levels, even at the highest doses tested
(30 µM). Thus, BPQ is the only downstream
B(a)P-diol metabolite that acts as a direct inducer of
CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. CYP1A1 induction potencies of various B(a)P
metabolites. HepG2 cells (3 x 106) were
seeded into 10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD
(), B(a)P ( ), B(a)P-diol ( ),
anti-BPDE ( ), or BPQ ( ) in DMSO were added to fresh
media to yield the appropriate range of final concentrations in 0.1%
DMSO. After 6 h, total RNA was harvested, and 10 µg of RNA per
lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and sequentially
analyzed for CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA as described in "Materials and
Methods." Results for each time point were determined by
PhosphorImager analysis and are expressed as the fraction of the
maximal CYP1A1:GAPDH ratio (observed with 30 nM TCDD).
|
|
Comparison of CYP1A1 mRNA Induction in HepG2 Cells by PAH
ortho-Quinones and Extended Quinones of B(a)P
To determine whether induction of CYP1A1 expression is a
hallmark of all PAH quinones, a series of PAH quinones were screened as
potential inducers of CYP1A1 (Fig. 6)
. In the first experiment, three extended quinones of B(a)P
derived from CYP-generated phenol metabolites were compared with the
AKR-generated ortho-quinone BPQ for their ability to induce
CYP1A1 in HepG2 cells. BPQ was a superior inducer of CYP1A1 mRNA when
compared with the 1,6-, 3,6-, and the
6,12-benzo(a)pyrene-diones. The abilities of various PAH
o-quinones generated by AKRs to induce CYP1A1 were
widely disparate (Fig. 6)
. The rank order of potency was BPQ >
BAQ > NPQ > DMBAQ. This rank order inversely follows their reactivity
with cellular thiols, e.g., glutathione (data not shown),
suggesting that increased electrophilicity of PAH o-quinones
may limit their ability to induce CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6. CYP1A1 induction by multiple classes of PAH quinones.
HepG2 cells (3 x 106) were seeded into
10-cm dishes, and 2 days later, stock solutions of TCDD (final
concentration, 30 nM; (Lane 1) or 3
µM of (in 1% DMSO) B(a)P (Lane 2),
BPQ (Lane 3), BAQ (Lane 4),
B(a)P-3,6-dione (Lane 5), NPQ (Lane
6), B(a)P-6,12-dione (Lane 7), DMBAQ
(Lane 8), B(a)P-1,6-dione (Lane 9), or
DMSO (Lane 10) were added. After 6 h, total RNA
was harvested, and 10 µg of RNA per lane were electrophoresed,
transferred to membranes, and sequentially analyzed for CYP1A1 and
GAPDH mRNA, and signal intensities were determined using the
PhosphorImager system as described in "Materials and Methods."
Results are expressed as a fraction of TCDD maximal induction of
CYP1A1.
|
|
Transcriptional Activation of XRE-dependent Reporter Gene
Expression by BPQ
To determine whether the observed increases in steady-state CYP1A1 mRNA
levels by BPQ were due to increased transcription of the
CYP1A1 gene via a XRE, the ability of BPQ to induce
XRE-dependent reporter gene expression was studied. HepG2-101L cells,
which carry a stably integrated XRE-containing portion of the
CYP1A1 promoter (-1612/+292) fused to the luciferase
reporter gene (36)
, were exposed to either
B(a)P (positive control) or BPQ. Both B(a)P and
BPQ efficiently stimulated transcription (
20- and 13-fold,
respectively) from the XRE-reporter (Fig. 7)
, demonstrating that BPQ mediates transcription of CYP1A1 mRNA via XREs
located in the 5' flanking region of the CYP1A1 gene.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7. BPQ activates XRE-dependent luciferase gene transcription.
HepG2-101L cells (1 x 106) were plated into
6-well plates in 2 ml of media. One day later, cells were exposed to 10
µM B(a)P or BPQ in 1% DMSO. Cells were
harvested 12 h later in 1 ml of passive lysis buffer, and 100-µl
aliquots were assayed for protein content and luciferase activity as
described in "Materials and Methods." Data are plotted as relative
light units/mg protein for each treatment. Mean ± SE of
triplicate determinations is given.
|
|
BPQ Fails to Induce CYP1A1 mRNA in AhR- or ARNT-deficient Cells
Because classical XRE-dependent transcription is activated by ligand
binding to the AhR, we next tested whether the induction of CYP1A1 mRNA
by BPQ was AhR dependent. The ability of BPQ to induce CYP1A1 mRNA in
wild-type (1c1c7), AhR-deficient (1c1c12), and ARNT-deficient (1c1c4)
murine hepatoma (hepa1) cells was therefore determined. Whereas BPQ was
able to induce CYP1A1 in wild-type hepa1c1c7 cells (Fig. 8)
, it failed to induce CYP1A1 in either AhR- or ARNT-deficient hepatoma
cells. These results clearly indicate that BPQ, like TCDD and
B(a)P, activates CYP1A1 expression via an
AhR/ARNT-dependent pathway.

View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 8. BPQ fails to induce CYP1A1 in AhR- and ARNT-deficient
murine hepatoma cells. Hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c12, and hepa1c1c4 cells
(3 x 106) were seeded into 10-cm dishes,
and 2 days later, they were treated with 1.0 µM BPQ to
yield a final concentration of 1% DMSO. Control cells received 1%
DMSO only. After 6 h, total RNA was harvested, and 10 µg of RNA
per lane were electrophoresed, transferred to membranes, and
sequentially analyzed for murine CYP1A1 and GAPDH mRNA levels as
described in "Materials and Methods."
|
|
BPQ Causes Translocation of the AhR to the Nucleus
To demonstrate the ability of BPQ to translocate the cytosolic AhR into
the nucleus of human cells, HepG2 cells were exposed to BPQ or to the
classical AhR ligands TCDD and B(a)P, and nuclear extracts
were prepared. Incubation of equal amounts of nuclear extracts from
untreated cells with a 32P-labeled XRE from the
CYP1A1 gene (-983 to -964 bp) failed to induce the
formation of a specific AhR-XRE complex. However, nuclear extracts from
TCDD-, and BPQ-treated cells resulted in the appearance of a specific
gel-shifted complex (Fig. 9)
. This complex was specific for the XRE, because increasing
concentrations of cold competitor XRE oligonucleotide successfully
eliminated this complex without causing loss of the lower nonspecific
band observed in all of the reactions.

View larger version (76K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 9. BPQ causes specific binding of nuclear AhR to the XRE.
Nuclear extracts from HepG2 cells treated for 90 min with DMSO, TCDD,
or BPQ (Lanes 13, respectively) were prepared and
incubated with the 5' end-labeled XRE oligonucleotide probe and
subjected to electrophoretic mobility shift assays. Arrow,
specific shifted complex after TCDD and BPQ treatment. NS,
nonspecific band. Lanes 4 and 5, BPQ-treated
nuclear extracts in the presence of 500-fold molar excess of cold XRE
or ARE oligonucleotide competitor
5'-CGCTTGATGACTCAGCCGGAA-3' (underline indicates ARE),
respectively. Lanes 610, BPQ-treated nuclear extracts in
the presence of increasing amounts of cold XRE competitor DNA (0x,
1x, 20x, 50x, 100x).
|
|
As a further confirmation of this result, hepa1c1c7 cells were treated
with DMSO, TCDD, anti-BPDE, or BPQ for 90 min and then fixed
for AhR immunofluorescence staining and microscopy (Fig. 10)
. In untreated cells, all immunofluorescence staining associated with the
AhR was present in the cytosol (Fig. 10A)
, and this staining
pattern remained unchanged after treatment with anti-BPDE
(Fig. 10C)
. However, after treatment with either BPQ (Fig. 10D)
or the classical AhR ligand TCDD (Fig. 10B)
,
a significant fraction of cells demonstrated intense AhR staining in
the nucleus, confirming the ability of BPQ to cause translocation of
AhR into the nucleus.

View larger version (109K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 10. BPQ causes translocation of the AhR to the nucleus.
Hepa1c1c7 cells were exposed to various treatments for 90 min, and the
subcellular distribution of AhR was assessed by indirect
immunofluorescence microscopy. A, 1% DMSO; B,
100 nM TCDD; C, 10 µM
anti-BPDE; D, 10 µM BPQ.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The initial observation that the proximate carcinogen
B(a)P-diol resulted in a substantial but delayed induction
of CYP1A1 mRNA in HepG2 cells implied that a downstream electrophilic
metabolite might be responsible for CYP1A1 induction. Coincubation of
B(a)P-diol with two separate AKR inhibitors abolished the
induction of CYP1A1 mRNA by B(a)P-diol, suggesting that the
AKR-catalyzed oxidation of B(a)P-diol to the
o-quinone BPQ was the requisite metabolic event. Subsequent
studies directly demonstrated that AKR-generated BPQ was nearly
equipotent with parent B(a)P with respect to its ability to
induce CYP1A1. To our knowledge, this is the first report of an
electrophilic PAH metabolite produced by a phase II (de)toxification
enzyme that is capable of inducing a phase I activating enzyme,
e.g., CYP1A1, via the AhR pathway.
Because X-ray crystallographic studies show that the oxidation of the
nonplanar B(a)P-diol by CYP1A1 results in the even more
torsionally strained anti-BPDE (37)
, it was not
surprising that anti-BPDE failed to be an inducer of CYP1A1.
In contrast, the oxidation of B(a)P-diol by AKRs initially
results in a catechol, which then undergoes successive one-electron
oxidations to form an o-quinone with carbons that are now
sp2-hybridized at the 7 and 8 positions, restoring
planarity to this electrophilic metabolite. Although there are no
crystal structures of PAH o-quinones to date,
energy minimization of B(a)P-diol, anti-BPDE, and
BPQ structures using QUANTA/CHARMm verified the uniquely planar
nature of BPQ (data not shown), a hallmark of AhR ligands.
These studies definitively show that PAH o-quinones utilize
the classical AhR signal transduction pathway to cause the induction of
CYP1A1. This was demonstrated by the ability of BPQ to (a)
induce CYP1A1 expression over a rapid time course, activate
XRE-dependent reporter gene expression, and cause translocation of the
AhR to the nucleus; and (b) by the failure of BPQ to induce
murine CYP1A1 in AhR- and ARNT-deficient murine hepatoma cells.
We have previously reported that AKR1C1 is constitutively expressed in
HepG2 cells and that it oxidizes B(a)P-diol to BPQ
efficiently (12
, 30)
. This would suggest that the
induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol should occur rapidly and
not over the delayed time course reported here. However, a sufficient
reservoir of "free" BPQ must first build up to act as a ligand of
the AhR. Studies on [3H]B(a)P-diol metabolism
in HepG2 cells reveal that there is a high level of glucuronyl- and
sulfo-transferase activity present, and that free BPQ is only detected
after 1224
h.5
Thus, the time required to detect free BPQ after B(a)P-diol
treatment is consistent with the time course observed for the indirect
induction of CYP1A1 by B(a)P-diol.
Parent PAHs are classified as bifunctional inducers because as planar
molecules they induce CYP1A1 expression via the AhR/XRE pathway, and
after metabolism, their downstream metabolites induce phase II
(de)toxification enzymes via the ARE pathway (21)
.
However, PAH o-quinones define a novel class of bifunctional
inducer that does not require metabolism to induce gene expression via
both mechanisms. In previous studies (12
, 30)
, we
demonstrated that AKR1C1 is induced (most likely via an ARE/EpRE-type
mechanism) by its reaction product, the electrophilic and redox-active
BPQ, thereby establishing an autoregulatory loop. PAH
o-quinones produced by this pathway are therefore
bifunctional because in the present studies they were also found to
induce CYP1A1 via the AhR/XRE pathway. Thus, due to their uniquely dual
planar/electrophilic nature, PAH o-quinones possess features
that allow them to simultaneously induce both phase I and phase II gene
expression through different mechanisms without a requirement for
further metabolism. We compare the mechanism of classical bifunctional
inducers described by Prochaska et al. (21)
with the mechanism of action of the new bifunctional inducers PAH
o-quinones (Fig. 11)
. Because PAH o-quinones can differ in their electrophilicity
by several orders of magnitude, their chemical reactivity may determine
their relative abilities to activate phase I versus phase II
(de)toxification gene expression via the XRE versus the ARE
pathways, respectively.

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 11. PAH o-quinones as novel bifunctional inducers.
A, PAHs are classical bifunctional inducers that induce
phase I enzymes via the AhR and then require CYP-dependent metabolism
to electrophilic intermediates to induce phase II enzymes via the ARE
(21)
. B, PAH o-quinones are novel
bifunctional inducers that are electrophiles produced by AKR1C1 that
can simultaneously induce phase II enzymes via the ARE and phase I
enzymes via the AhR without a requirement for further metabolism.
|
|
The ability of AKRs to compete with CYPs and thereby divert
B(a)P-diol from the potent mutagen and carcinogen
anti-BPDE was initially believed to represent a bona
fide detoxification route to an innocuous catechol
(11)
. However, it is well established that the resultant
catechol spontaneously autoxidizes to BPQ, and that BPQ possesses an
undesirable toxicological profile. First, because it is a Michael
acceptor, it forms adducts with DNA, RNA, protein, and glutathione.
With calf thymus DNA, both stable dG adducts and N7-guanine
depurinating adducts have been reported (18
, 19)
. The
formation of the adducts proceeds via a ketol that rearranges to a
catechol that is subsequently autoxidized to the o-quinone
adduct, a sequence that generates reactive oxygen in proximity to DNA.
Second, BPQ is redox active and will enter futile cycles to generate
ROS multiple times. The amplification of ROS by BPQ and other PAH
o-quinones explains their ability to cleave genomic DNA. DNA
strand scission proceeds via a Criegee rearrangement and can lead to
the formation of base-propenals and malondialdehyde (20)
.
Thus AKR-catalyzed BPQ formation represents a potential alternative
promutagenic pathway to the CYP1A1-catalyzed formation of
anti-BPDE. However, for these events to occur in whole
cells, BPQ must gain access to the nucleus.
Our discovery that PAH o-quinones generated in the cytosol
are shuttled into the nuclear compartment via the AhR reveals the only
known mechanism by which genotoxic PAH o-quinones can be
targeted to the nucleus with specificity. Although higher
concentrations of BPQ (20 µM) can be sequestered in a
nonspecific manner into the cell pellet, significantly lower
concentrations of BPQ (
100300 nM) result in detectable
CYP1A1 induction. Thus, at low concentrations, preferential targeting
may indeed be achieved by the AhR. Because BPQ is a redox active
compound and will enter into futile cycles, this specific targeting of
low concentrations of BPQ could contribute to its genotoxic profile. In
this regard, it is well known that after ligand-dependent translocation
of the AhR to the nucleus, the AhR is rapidly degraded to limit the
duration of CYP1A1 induction (38
, 39)
. It is unclear,
however, what happens to the previously bound ligand. Local liberation
of PAH o-quinones in proximity to genomic DNA, which is
known to contain copper (40
, 41)
, will enhance redox
cycling in the presence of nuclear reducing equivalents and provides a
mechanism for the oxidative DNA damage observed with parent PAH
in vitro and in vivo (42
, 43)
. In
the future, it will be interesting to determine whether the genotoxic
effects of BPQ are attenuated in AhR-deficient cells.
In addition to the implications for the initiation phase of PAH
carcinogenesis, the activation of the AhR by PAH o-quinones
may also play a role in the promotion stage. The propensity of PAH
o-quinones to redox cycle and amplify ROS in PAH-exposed
cells may mimic the tumor-promoting effects of phorbol myristoyl
acetate by generating oxidative stress, which can lead to the
inappropriate activation of protein kinase C and expression of the
proto-oncogenes c-fos and c-jun
(44)
. TCDD is also a well-established tumor promoter
(45, 46, 47, 48)
, and the ability of PAH o-quinones to
mimic a well-characterized property of TCDD (CYP1A1 induction) may
represent an epigenetic property of PAH o-quinones that
contributes to the ability of PAHs to act as complete carcinogens.
In summary, these studies demonstrate that PAH o-quinones
generated by human AKRs induce the PAH-activating enzyme CYP1A1 via an
AhR-dependent mechanism. The ability of genotoxic PAH
o-quinones to enter the nucleus and mimic the potent tumor
promoter TCDD may have important implications for both the initiation
and promotion phases of PAH carcinogenesis. These and other in
vitro studies underscore the need to test PAH
o-quinones as endogenously generated
tumor-initiating/promoting metabolites of PAHs in in vivo
models of chemical carcinogenesis.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Dr. Oliver Hankinson for the murine hepatoma cells
(hepa1c1c7, hepa1c1c4, and hepa1c1c12) and Dr. Robert H. Tukey for the
stably transfected human hepatoma cells (HepG2-101L) used in these
studies. We also thank Drs. Randy Pittman, Matthew K. Perez, and Nicole
Stone for help with the immunofluorescence microscopy.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by NIH Grants CA39504 and
CA55711 (to T. M. P.) and a Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America Foundation Advanced Predoctoral Fellowship (to
M. E. B.). 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Department of Pharmacology, University of Pennsylvania
School of Medicine, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104-6084.
Phone: (215) 898-9445; Fax: (215) 573-2236; E-mail: penning{at}pharm.med.upenn.edu 
3 The abbreviations used are: PAH,
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon; B(a)P,
benzo(a)pyrene; AhR, aryl hydrocarbon receptor; AKR,
aldo-keto reductase; ARE/EpRE, antioxidant response
element/electrophilic response element; BPQ,
benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-dione; CYP, cytochrome P450;
B(a)P-diol,
(±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo(a)pyrene;
ARE, antioxidant response element; EpRE, electrophilic response
element; XRE, xenobiotic response element; anti-BPDE,
(±)-anti-7,8-dihydroxy-9,10-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene;
TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin; ARNT, AhR nuclear
translocator; ROS, reactive oxygen species; 6MPA, 6-medroxyprogesterone
acetate; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; BAQ,
benz[a]anthracene-3,4-dione; NPQ, naphthalene-1,2-dione;
DMBAQ, dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-3,4-dione; DD,
dihydrodiol dehydrogenase
[trans-1,2-dihydrobenzene-1,2-diol dehydrogenase (EC
1.3.1.20)]. 
4 The nomenclature for the AKR superfamily was
proposed by Jez et al. (Ref. 14
) and adopted at the 8th
International Symposium on Enzymology and Molecular Biology of Carbonyl
Metabolism in Deadwood, South Dakota, June 29July 3, 1996. 
5 C. Yarosh and T. M. Penning, unpublished
observations. 
Received 8/ 2/99.
Accepted 12/ 9/99.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Gelboin H. V. Benzo[a]pyrene metabolism, activation and carcinogenesis: role and regulation of mixed function oxidases and related enzymes. Physiol. Rev., 60: 1107-1166, 1980.[Free Full Text]
-
Conney A. H. Induction of microsomal enzymes by foreign chemicals and carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. G. H. A. Clowes Memorial Lecture. Cancer Res., 42: 4875-4917, 1982.[Free Full Text]
-
Dipple, A. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon carcinogenesis: Introduction. In: R. G. Harvey (ed.), Polycyclic Aromatic Carcinogenesis, pp. 117. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 283. Washington, D.C., American Chemical Society, 1985.
-
Yang S. K., McCourt D. W., Roller P. P., Gelboin H. V. Enzymatic conversion of benzo[a]pyrene leading predominantly to the diol-epoxide r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-t-9,10-oxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene through a single enantiomer of r-7,t-8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73: 2594-2598, 1976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Thakker D. R., Yagi H., Lu A. Y. H., Levin W., Conney A. H., Jerina D. M. Metabolism of benzo[a]pyrene: conversion of (±)-trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene to highly mutagenic 7,8-diol-9,10-epoxides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 73: 3381-3385, 1976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hernandez, O., and Bend, J. R. Metabolism of epoxides. In: W. B. Jakoby (ed.), Metabolic Basis of Detoxication, pp. 207228, New York: Academic Press, 1982.
-
Marshall C. J., Vousden K. H., Phillips D. H. Activation of c-Ha-ras-1 proto-oncogene by in vitro chemical modification with a chemical carcinogen, benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide. Nature (Lond.), 310: 585-589, 1984.
-
Denissenko M. F., Pao A., Tang M. S., Pfieifer G. P. Preferential formation of benzo[a]pyrene adducts at lung cancer mutational hotspots in p53. Science (Washington DC), 274: 430-432, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hruszkewicz A. M., Canella K. A., Peltonen K., Lotrappa L., Dipple A. DNA polymerase action on benzo[a]pyrene-DNA adducts. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 13: 2347-2352, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Vousden K. H., Bos J. L., Marshall C. J., Phillips D. H. Mutations activating c-Ha-ras1 protooncogene (HRAS1) induced by chemical carcinogenesis and depurination. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 1222-1226, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Smithgall T. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Regio- and stereospecificity of homogeneous 3
-hydroxysteroid-dihydrodiol dehydrogenase for trans-dihydrodiol metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. J. Biol. Chem., 261: 6184-6191, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Burczynski M. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Expression and characterization of four recombinant human dihydrodiol dehydrogenase isoforms: oxidation of trans-7,8-dihydroxy-7,8-dihydrobenzo[a]pyrene to the activated o-quinone metabolite benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione. Biochemistry, 37: 6781-6790, 1998.[Medline]
-
Smithgall T. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Spectroscopic identification of ortho-quinones as the products of polycyclic aromatic trans-dihydrodiol oxidation catalyzed by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. J. Biol. Chem., 263: 1814-1820, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Jez J. M., Flynn T. G., Penning T. M. A new nomenclature system for the aldo-keto reductase superfamily. Biochem. Pharmacol., 54: 639-647, 1997.[Medline]
-
Penning T. M., Ohnishi S. T., Ohnishi T., Harvey R. G. Generation of reactive oxygen species during the enzymatic oxidation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon trans-dihydrodiols catalyzed by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 9: 84-92, 1996.[Medline]
-
Flowers-Geary L., Bleczinski W., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones produced by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Chem. Biol. Interact., 99: 55-72, 1996.[Medline]
-
Flowers L., Bleczinski W. F., Burczynski M. E., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Disposition and biological activity of benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione. A genotoxic metabolite generated by dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Biochemistry, 35: 13664-13672, 1996.[Medline]
-
Shou M., Harvey R. G., Penning T. M. Reactivity of benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione with DNA. Evidence for the formation of deoxyguanosine adducts. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 475-482, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
McCoull K. D., Rindgen D., Blair I. A., Penning T. M. Synthesis and characterization of depurinating adducts of polycylic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 12: 237-246, 1999.[Medline]
-
Flowers L., Ohnishi S. T., Penning T. M. DNA strand scission by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon o-quinones: role of reactive oxygen species, Cu(II)/Cu(I) redox cycling and o-semiquinone anion radicals. Biochemistry, 36: 8640-8648, 1997.[Medline]
-
Prochaska H. J., De Long M. J., Talalay P. On the mechanism of induction of cancer protective enzymes: a unifying proposal. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 82: 8232-8236, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Okey A. B., Riddick D. S., Harper P. A. Molecular biology of the aromatic hydrocarbon (dioxin) receptor. Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 15: 226-232, 1994.[Medline]
-
Hankinson O. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor complex. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 35: 307-340, 1995.[Medline]
-
Whitlock J. P., Jr., Okino S. T., Dong L., Ko H. P., Clarke-Katzenberg R., Ma Q., Li H. Induction of cytochrome P4501A1: a model for analyzing mammalian gene transcription. FASEB J., 10: 809-818, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Talalay P., De Long M. J., Prochaska H. J. Identification of a common chemical signal regulating the induction of enzymes that protect against chemical carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 8261-8265, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rushmore T. H., Morton M. R., Pickett C. B. The antioxidant responsive element. Activation by oxidative stress and identification of the DNA consensus sequence required for functional activity. J. Biol. Chem., 266: 11632-11639, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Venugopal R., Jaiswal A. K. Nrf2 and Nrf1 in association with Jun proteins regulate antioxidant response element-mediated expression and coordinated induction of genes encoding detoxifying enzymes. Oncogene, 17: 3145-3156, 1998.[Medline]
-
Itoh K., Chiba T., Takahashi S., Ishii T., Igarashi K., Katoh Y., Oyake T., Hayashi N., Satoh K., Hatayama I., Yamamoto M., Nabeshima Y. An Nrf2/small Maf heterodimer mediates the induction of phase II detoxifying enzyme genes through antioxidant response elements. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 236: 313-322, 1997.[Medline]
-
Hayes J. D., Pullford D. J. The glutathione-S-transferase supergene family: regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection and drug resistance. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 30: 445-600, 1995.[Medline]
-
Burczynski M. E., Lin H. K., Penning T. M. Isoform-specific induction of a human aldo-keto reductase by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), electrophiles and oxidative stress: implications for the alternative pathway of PAH activation catalyzed by human dihydrodiol dehydrogenase. Cancer Res., 59: 607-614, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Fieser L. F. ß-Napthoquinone and
-napthoquinone. Org. Synth., 2: 430-435, 1943.
-
Sukumaran K. B., Harvey R. G. Synthesis of the o-quinones and dihydrodiols of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from the corresponding phenols. J. Org. Chem., 45: 4407-4413, 1980.
-
Ausubel, F. M., Brent, R., Kingston, R. E., Moore, D. D., Seidman, J. G., Smith, J. A., and Struhl, K. Current Protocols in Molecular Biology. New York: Wiley, 1989.
-
Kress S., Greenlee W. F. Cell-specific regulation of human CYP1A1 and CYP1B1 genes. Cancer Res., 57: 1265-1269, 1997.
-
Riddick D. S., Huang Y., Harper P. A., Okey A. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin versus 3-methylcholanthrene: comparative studies of Ah receptor binding, transformation, and induction of CYP1A1. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 12118-12128, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Postlind H., Vu T. P., Tukey R. H., Quattrochi L. C. Response of human CYP1-luciferase plasmids to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 118: 255-262, 1993.[Medline]
-
Glusker, J. P. X-ray analyses of polycyclic hydrocarbon metabolite structures. In: R. G. Harvey (ed.), Polycyclic Hydrocarbons and Carcinogenesis, pp. 125185. ACS Symposium Series, Vol. 283. Washington, D.C.: American Chemical Society, 1985.
-
Pollenz R. S. The aryl hydrocarbon receptor, but not the aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator protein, is rapidly depleted in hepatic and nonhepatic culture cells exposed to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Mol. Pharmacol., 49: 391-398, 1996.[Abstract]
-
Giannone J. V., Li W., Probst M., Okey A. Prolonged depletion of AH receptor without alteration of receptor mRNA levels after treatment of cells in culture with 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Biochem. Pharmacol., 55: 489-497, 1998.[Medline]
-
Wacker W. E. C., Vallee B. L. Nucleic acids and metals. J. Biol. Chem., 231: 3257-3262, 1959.
-
Prutz W. A., Butler J., Land E. J. Interaction of Cu(I) with nucleic acids. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 58: 215-234, 1990.[Medline]
-
Leadon S. A., Stampfer M. R., Bartley J. Production of oxidative DNA damage during the metabolic activation of benzo[a]pyrene in human mammary epithelial cells correlates with cell killing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 85: 4345-4368, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kim K. B., Lee B. M. Oxidative stress to DNA, protein and antioxidant enzymes (superoxide dismutase and catalase) in rats treated with benzo[a]pyrene. Cancer Lett., 113: 205-212, 1997.[Medline]
-
Cerutti P. A. Prooxidant states and tumor promotion. Science (Washington DC), 227: 375-381, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shu H. P., Paustenbach D. J., Murray F. J. A critical evaluation of the use of mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, and tumor promotion data in a cancer risk assessment of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol., 7: 57-88, 1987.[Medline]
-
Birnbaum L. S. The mechanism of dioxin toxicity: relationship to risk assessment. Environ. Health. Perspect., 102: 157-167, 1994.
-
Whysner J., Williams G. M. 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlordibenzo-p-dioxin mechanistic data and risk assessment: gene regulation, cytotoxicity, enhanced cellular proliferation, and tumor promotion. Pharmacol. Ther., 71: 193-223, 1996.[Medline]
-
Tritscher A. M., Goldstein J. A., Portier C. J., McCoy Z., Clark G. C., Lucier G. W. Dose-response relationships for chronic exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachloro-dibenzo-p-dioxin in a rat tumor promotion model: quantification and immunolocalization of CYP1A1 and CYP1A2 in the liver. Cancer Res., 52: 3436-3442, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. M. Penning and C. Lerman
Genomics of Smoking Exposure and Cessation: Lessons for Cancer Prevention and Treatment
Cancer Prevention Research,
July 1, 2008;
1(2):
80 - 83.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J.-H. Park, D. Mangal, K. A. Tacka, A. M. Quinn, R. G. Harvey, I. A. Blair, and T. M. Penning
Evidence for the aldo-keto reductase pathway of polycyclic aromatic trans-dihydrodiol activation in human lung A549 cells
PNAS,
May 13, 2008;
105(19):
6846 - 6851.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. Nagy, S. Adachi, T. Takamura-Enya, M. Zeisig, and L. Moller
DNA adduct formation and oxidative stress from the carcinogenic urban air pollutant 3-nitrobenzanthrone and its isomer 2-nitrobenzanthrone, in vitro and in vivo
Mutagenesis,
March 1, 2007;
22(2):
135 - 145.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. L. Thomae, E. Glover, and C. A. Bradfield
A Maternal Ahr Null Genotype Sensitizes Embryos to Chemical Teratogenesis
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 16, 2004;
279(29):
30189 - 30194.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Adachi, Y. Mori, S. Matsui, and T. Matsuda
Comparison of Gene Expression Patterns between 2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin and a Natural Arylhydrocarbon Receptor Ligand, Indirubin
Toxicol. Sci.,
July 1, 2004;
80(1):
161 - 169.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Solhaug, M. Refsnes, M. Lag, P. E. Schwarze, T. Husoy, and J. A. Holme
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons induce both apoptotic and anti-apoptotic signals in Hepa1c1c7 cells
Carcinogenesis,
May 1, 2004;
25(5):
809 - 819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-K. Hurtig and M. San Sebastian
Geographical differences in cancer incidence in the Amazon basin of Ecuador in relation to residence near oil fields
Int. J. Epidemiol.,
October 1, 2002;
31(5):
1021 - 1027.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Okabe, S. Satoh, T. Kato, O. Kitahara, R. Yanagawa, Y. Yamaoka, T. Tsunoda, Y. Furukawa, and Y. Nakamura
Genome-wide Analysis of Gene Expression in Human Hepatocellular Carcinomas Using cDNA Microarray: Identification of Genes Involved in Viral Carcinogenesis and Tumor Progression
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2001;
61(5):
2129 - 2137.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y.-W. Kwon, S. Ueda, M. Ueno, J. Yodoi, and H. Masutani
Mechanism of p53-dependent Apoptosis Induced by 3-Methylcholanthrene. INVOLVEMENT OF p53 PHOSPHORYLATION AND p38 MAPK
J. Biol. Chem.,
January 11, 2002;
277(3):
1837 - 1844.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|