Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barcellos-Hoff, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ravani, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barcellos-Hoff, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ravani, S. A.
[Cancer Research 60, 1254-1260, March 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Carcinogenesis

Irradiated Mammary Gland Stroma Promotes the Expression of Tumorigenic Potential by Unirradiated Epithelial Cells1

Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff2 and Shraddha A. Ravani

Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
We have shown that ionizing radiation, a known carcinogen of human breast, elicits rapid, persistent, and global changes in the mammary microenvironment as evidenced by altered extracellular matrix composition and growth factor activities. To address whether these events contribute to radiogenic carcinogenesis, we evaluated the effect of irradiated mammary stroma on the neoplastic potential of COMMA-D mammary epithelial cells. Although COMMA-D cells harbor mutations in both alleles of p53, they are nontumorigenic when injected s.c. into syngeneic hosts. Unirradiated COMMA-D cells transplanted to mammary fat pads cleared previously of epithelia preferentially formed tumors in irradiated hosts. Tumor incidence at 6 weeks was 81% ± 12 SE when animals were irradiated with 4 Gy, 3 days prior to transplantation, compared with 19% ± 2 SE (P < 0.005) in sham-irradiated hosts. This effect was evident when cells were transplanted 1 to 14 days after irradiation. Furthermore, tumors were significantly larger (243.1 ± 61.3 mm3 versus 30.8 ± 8.7 mm3) and arose more quickly (100% by 6 weeks versus 39% over 10 weeks in sham hosts) in fat pads in irradiated hosts. The contribution of local versus systemic effects was evaluated using hemibody (left versus right) irradiation; tumors formed only in fat pads on the irradiated side. These data indicate that radiation-induced changes in the stromal microenvironment can contribute to neoplastic progression in vivo. Disruption of solid tissue interactions is a heretofore unrecognized activity of ionizing radiation as a carcinogen.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The multistep model of carcinogenesis defines cancer initiation as genomic change and promotion as the series of events leading to proliferation of initiated cells. Agents that promote carcinogenesis are generally thought to increase the probability that a cell will acquire additional mutations necessary for neoplastic progression. Quantitative studies in rodent models demonstrated that the number of cells initiated, as evidenced by morphological transformation in culture after either physical or chemical carcinogen exposure, far exceeds the number of tumors that develop in vivo (1 , 2) . Because initiation appears to be a frequent event (3) , the factors that facilitate expression of tumorigenic potential are critical in determining cancer frequency but are still poorly understood.

The contribution of stroma to early events in carcinogenesis has recently begun to be appreciated. Whereas it is well-recognized that tumors can recruit cells (e.g., endothelial cells) and induce changes in the stroma that are conducive to their growth (4 , 5) , it has also been suggested that disruption of stromal/epithelial interactions may provide a stimulus for initiated cells to move further down the neoplastic pathway (6 , 7) . Specialized microenvironments, composed of insoluble ECM3 and soluble growth factors, mediate epithelial-stromal interactions and play a pivotal role in normal tissue development and function (8 , 9) . Such interactions can efficiently suppress the expression of the neoplastic phenotype (3 , 10 , 11) . Conversely, abnormal stromal/epithelial interactions have been shown to enhance the ability of cells to express the neoplastic phenotype (12 , 13) . Transgenic manipulation of the microenvironment, rather than the target cell, can also stimulate tumorigenesis (14) . Recent studies in chronic myelogenous leukemia and in human mammary cancer cells indicate that reestablishing appropriate interactions with the ECM can reverse tumorigenesis and neoplastic behavior, even in the presence of grossly abnormal genetic damage (15 , 16) .

Ionizing radiation is a complete carcinogen, able both to initiate and promote neoplastic progression (17) , and is a known carcinogen of human breast (18, 19, 20, 21) and rodent mammary glands (22, 23, 24) . Our previous studies have demonstrated that radiation exposure elicits rapid and persistent global remodeling of the mammary gland ECM (25) . Because cell-ECM interactions are pivotal in mammary differentiation and growth control (26 , 27) , we postulated that the radiation-induced mammary microenvironment may contribute to radiation carcinogenesis by disrupting cell interactions in a manner that is conducive to expression of neoplastic potential (28) .

To test the above hypothesis, we transplanted epithelial-free mammary stroma with the functionally normal COMMA-D mammary epithelial cell line. The COMMA-D mammary epithelial cell line arose spontaneously from a primary culture of epithelial cells from mammary glands of pregnant BALB/c mice and is nontumorigenic at early passages (29) . It was shown subsequently to contain two mutations in p53 characterized as substitution of Trp for Cys at codon 138 and deletion of the first 21 nucleotides of exon 5 (30) , which result in nuclear accumulation (31) . The mutations in p53 in these cells suggest that the population may be genomically unstable and susceptible to neoplastic transformation (30) .

We show here that COMMA-D cells transplanted to cleared mammary glands in irradiated hosts gave rise to significantly more tumors that arose more quickly and grew larger than in unirradiated animals. Hemibody irradiation supports the conclusion that radiation effects on mammary microenvironment is critical because tumors arose only when COMMA-D cells were transplanted to the irradiated side of animals. These data demonstrate that radiation effects on stroma facilitate expression of neoplastic potential in the absence of exogenously induced mutagenic events in mammary epithelial cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Animals
Female BALB/c mice were obtained from Simonson (Gilroy, CA) and housed five per cage with chow and water ad libitum in a temperature- and light-controlled facility. When necessary, mice were anesthetized using xyalzine (40 mg/kg) and ketamine (25 mg/kg) injected i.m. Carbon dioxide inhalation was used to kill the animals in accordance with Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care guidelines and institutional review and approval. The fourth inguinal mammary glands were removed for histology and whole mounts.

Cell Culture
COMMA-D mouse mammary epithelial cells originating from midpregnant BALB/c mice (29) were obtained at passage 11 from Dr. Peggy Neville (University of Colorado, Denver, CO) and were expanded and frozen at passage 13. Cells were grown routinely in 1:1 F12:DMEM supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, epidermal growth factor (5 ng/ml), insulin, transferrin, and selenium on tissue culture plastic in a 5% CO2 humidified incubator at 37°C and passaged twice weekly at <90% confluency. Cells were used between passages 15 and 24. Differential trypsinization was used to enrich for morphological variants at passage 22 by collecting cells released in the first 3 min of trypsinization (CD-3T), adding trypsin for an additional 2 min (discarded), followed by an additional 5 min of trypsinization to release the remaining cells (CD-5R). Each subpopulation was expanded one passage, and aliquots were frozen for subsequent characterization. Cells were trypsinized, counted, and resuspended in serum-free medium or PBS immediately before transplantation.

Transplantation Assay
The female mammary gland is unique among all glands in that the epithelium develops postnatally from a rudiment that can be removed from the inguinal glands at ~3 weeks of age (32) . Surgical removal of the parenchyma results in a gland-free mammary fat pad, referred to as a CFP, suitable for receiving donor tissue at the time of clearing or later (32) . Transplantation of normal mammary epithelial cells produces ductal outgrowths that fill the fat pad and are nearly indistinguishable in whole mounts or histologically from intact gland (32) . Anesthetized 3-week-old mice were opened s.c. at the anterior midline and along each flank to reveal the inguinal mammary gland. The epithelium was destroyed by cauterizing the connection to the 5th gland, and removing the tissue from the nipple to just above the lymph node, leaving approximately two-thirds of the fat pad. The procedure was repeated on the opposite side, and the skin was closed with wound clips.

Mammary glands were cleared of epithelia at 3 weeks of age. The mice were irradiated and transplanted at 10–12 weeks of age. The CFPs were exposed from the rostral midline to avoid the scar tissue formed by clearing. Known numbers of COMMA-D cells were injected using a Hamilton syringe into the fat pad in a volume of 10 µl. Animals were monitored weekly for gross changes and sacrificed at 6–10 weeks as indicated, and the inguinal glands were removed for analysis. Glands were fixed in 100% ethanol:glacial acetic acid (3:1) for 24 h, followed by alum carmine, according to published methods (33) . Tumor sizes were determined by caliper measurements of width, thickness, and length in the whole mounts, and the approximate tumor volume was calculated as the product of these. Selected tissues were fresh frozen in OCT (Miles Associates, St. Louis, MO).

Irradiation
Unanesthetized mice were whole-body irradiated in perforated Plexiglas tubes using 60Co {gamma}-radiation at a dose rate of 0.32 Gy/min to a total dose of 4 Gy. Dosimetry was determined using an Victoreen ionization chamber. Anesthetized animals were used for hemibody irradiation (4 Gy) by shielding the right lateral half with lead collimators. Control animals were sham irradiated with or without anesthesia, as indicated.

Immunofluorescence
Cells were seeded in 24-well plates in 1 ml of 0.5% serum-containing medium. After reaching confluence, cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 500 µl of methanol for 10 min at -20°C for vimentin and keratin staining and in methanol overnight at 4°C for p53 immunostaining. Fixed cells were stored in PBS at 4°C before immunostaining. Cryosections (5 µm) were fixed with 2% buffered paraformaldehyde for 20 min for p53 immunostaining and 4% buffered paraformaldehyde for 10 min for vimentin and keratin immunostaining.

Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against p53 protein (CM5; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) were used at 1:500 (0.5 µg/ml). Monoclonal mouse antibodies against vimentin (clone VIM 13.2; Sigma) were used at 1:200 dilution (10 µg/ml), and polyclonal guinea pig antibodies to keratin (Sigma) were used at 1:100 dilution.

Nonspecific reactivity was blocked with the supernatant of 0.5% casein stirred for 1 h in PBS. Specimens were incubated with 50 µl of primary antibody overnight (18–20 h) at 4°C. Vimentin and pan-keratin primary antibodies were incubated together, followed by sequential incubation with fluorochrome-labeled secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were counterstained with DAPI at 0.5 µg/ml (Sigma) during the last wash. Specimens were mounted with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories) and stored at -20°C prior to viewing. Whole mounts were embedded in paraffin and sectioned at 5 µm for standard histology staining with H&E. Sections from whole mounts were incubated with p53 antibodies as above and detected with alkaline phosphatase-linked secondary antibody.

Image Acquisition and Processing
Fluorescence microscopy of double or triple fluorescence-stained sections were imaged using a Zeiss Axiovert equipped with epifluorescence and multiband pass filter and differential wavelength filter wheel. Images were acquired using a scientific-grade 12-bit charged coupled device (KAF-1400, 1317 x 1035 6.8-µm square pixels) camera (Xillix, Vancouver, Canada). The images were captured so that intensities for a given experiment fell within the 12-bit linear range. Relative intensity was maintained when constructing figures by scaling the data set to a common 8-bit scale using Scilimage (TNO, Delft, the Netherlands).

Statistical Analysis
Tumor incidence was evaluated using 95% confidence intervals and the z test of proportion for data derived from a single experiment or two-tailed t test for data from multiple experiments (SigmaStat, Santa Rosa, CA). The significance of differences between tumor size for sham-irradiated control and irradiated animals were determined using two-tailed Mann-Whitney rank sum test (34) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
COMMA-D Cells Retain Mammary Developmental Potential and Are Nontumorigenic.
COMMA-D cells are functionally intact in that they can be induced by lactogenic hormones to synthesize a number of milk proteins, including ß-casein (35) . We confirmed that the cell line also retains the capacity to produce ductal outgrowths in vivo when early-passage cells are transplanted to CFPs (29) and undergo morphogenic reorganization into acini when cultured on a complex basement membrane-type matrix (25) . When transplanted into CFPs of 3-week-old mice, COMMA-D cells form a simple mammary ductal outgrowth that fills 25–100% of the stroma. These outgrowths were confirmed as originating from COMMA-D cells by nuclear p53 immunoreactivity, which was absent from stromal cells (not shown). Tumors were not observed when COMMA-D cells were transplanted at the time of clearing in 3-week-old animals or when injected s.c. into adult syngeneic hosts (0.5, 1, or 2 million) over a period of 8 weeks (n = 6, not shown).

COMMA-D Cells Transplanted to CFPs of Irradiated Hosts Establish Tumors Rapidly.
Our previous studies indicated that ionizing radiation leads to global remodeling of the ECM and induces activity of potent modulators of epithelial behavior (25 , 36 , 37) . Individually irradiated mammary glands exhibit the same microenvironment changes as those from whole-body-irradiated animals, indicating that these effects are mediated by local factors.4 CFPs from irradiated mice show similar remodeling of the microenvironment as that observed in intact mammary glands (not shown).

We tested whether the irradiated mammary microenvironment could modulate the neoplastic potential of COMMA-D mammary epithelial cells. Different numbers of unirradiated COMMA-D cells were transplanted to CFPs in adult mice that were sham-irradiated or that received 4 Gy 60Co {gamma}-radiation 3 days prior to transplantation (Fig. 1)Citation . A single tumor formed in sham-irradiated CFPs transplanted with 2 x 106 cells (n = 6); no tumors were observed when fewer cells were injected. However, tumors arose in irradiated CFPs as a function of cell number, even when transplanted with as few as 2.5 x 105 cells. Every CFP (100%) from irradiated hosts contained tumors when injected with 2 x 106 unirradiated COMMA-D cells. In four independent experiments (n = 36 injected CFPs), tumor incidence was significantly (P < 0.005, two-tailed t test) greater in irradiated CFPs (30 of 36) versus sham-irradiated (8 of 36). The percentage of CFP-bearing tumors averaged 19% ± 2 SE in sham-irradiated hosts and 81% ± 12 SE in hosts irradiated with 4 Gy, 3 days prior to transplantation.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Tumor incidence of COMMA-D cells as a function of cell number in sham-irradiated hosts ({square}) or total body irradiated hosts ({blacksquare}). Animals were irradiated with 4 Gy, 3 days before transplantation of cells to CFPs. The incidence of tumors was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in irradiated hosts transplanted with 106 cells or more.

 
Ductal outgrowths were obtained at low frequency (~25%) in adult mice, but the frequency and character were similar in irradiated and sham-irradiated CFPs. In addition, we found that the transplantation take of normal mammary tissue fragments to sham and irradiated hosts was equivalent.5 Thus, the ability of cells to survive and/or grow in mammary glands in both sham and irradiated hosts was similar. Some tumors were found in association with otherwise normal-appearing ductal outgrowths (Fig. 2A)Citation , but most were isolated.



View larger version (62K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. A, whole mounts of COMMA-D outgrowths. COMMA-D cells were transplanted into CFPs at 10 weeks of age into sham (a) or irradiated (b) animals. Tumors, such as the one to the left of the image in b, were sometimes associated with otherwise normal-appearing ductal outgrowths. B, p53 immunoreactivity is found in ductal outgrowths and tumors. Enzymatic detection (red) of p53 by the CM5 antibody localized to nuclei in ductal outgrowths (a) versus tumors prepared from whole mounts of mammary glands that were embedded in paraffin for histology (b). Although p53 detection is compromised by the whole-mount preparation (compare frequency of positive cells between Bb and Cb), specific nuclear staining (arrows) is epithelial in outgrowths and heterogeneous in the tumor. Note lack of staining in the stromal cells around ducts or tumors. Controls in which the primary antibody was deleted for sections of outgrowths (c) and tumors (d) show diffuse, nonspecific background and black debris. C, characterization of tumors. a, dual immunofluorescence localization of vimentin (green) and keratin (red) demonstrate keratin staining of tumor cells. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Arrowhead, tumor capsule, which is vimentin-positive and keratin-negative. b, immunofluorescence localization of p53 (green) in tumor cryosections. Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). Note lack of p53 in stroma (arrow). Bar, 10 µm.

 
Nuclear accumulation of p53 was evident in ductal outgrowths and tumors and was lacking from cells in adjacent stroma (Fig. 2B)Citation . Tumors were both vimentin and keratin positive and exhibited nuclear p53, indicative of their origin from COMMA-D cells (Fig. 2C)Citation . Note that p53 immunostaining was heterogeneous but more evident using the more sensitive immunofluorescence detection. This heterogeneity is also evident in culture (Fig. 4)Citation .



View larger version (59K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Morphological and immunostaining characteristics of cultured COMMA-D mammary epithelial cells (A and E) and subpopulations, 3T (B and F) and 5R (C and G). Nuclei are counterstained with DAPI (blue). A–D, vimentin and keratin dual indirect immunofluorescence. The parent population contains cells that are vimentin positive (green), keratin positive (red), or both (orange). 3T cells are predominantly vimentin positive, whereas 5R contains cells that are both vimentin and keratin positive, as indicated by the orange color, indicative of fluorochrome colocalization. E–H, p53 immunoreactivity. Immunofluorescence localization of nuclear p53 (green) is heterogeneous in all three cell populations. D and H, antibody minus controls. Deletion of primary antibodies for vimentin and keratin (left) or p53 (right) is shown. Bar, 20 µm.

 
The persistence of radiation effects was determined by transplanting COMMA-D cells to CFPs as a function of time after exposure to 4 Gy whole-body 60Co {gamma}-radiation exposure (Fig. 3)Citation . All irradiated animals showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in tumor incidence, ranging from 100% at 3 day to 58% at 14 days after irradiation compared with 25% in the sham-irradiated host. The peak occurred when irradiated animals were transplanted at 3 days after irradiation, at which time tumors arose in 100% of glands in irradiated hosts. Furthermore, the mean size of tumors from irradiated animals was 243 mm3 ± 61 SD compared with 31 mm3 ± 9 SD in the few tumors that arose in sham-irradiated hosts. The mean size of tumors in irradiated animals at all times after irradiation were significantly (P < 0.05; Mann-Whitney rank sum test) larger than the size of tumors in sham-irradiated control animals.



View larger version (18K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Tumor frequency and size after transplantation of COMMA-D cells as a function of time after irradiation. A, tumor incidence (n = 12) was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in hosts irradiated 1, 3, and 7 days before transplantation. B, tumor size distributions. The median tumor sizes of the five treatment groups were significantly different (P < 0.05) based on Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on ranks (34) . d, days.

 
To test whether tumor formation was accelerated in the irradiated CFPs, we evaluated tumor incidence as a function of time after transplantation. Tumors arose too quickly in irradiated mammary glands (100% by 6 weeks) to permit extending their observation period. The overall tumor incidence in sham-irradiated hosts over a period of 10 weeks was 39% of transplanted CFPs examined. Tumor incidence decreased from 6 to 10 weeks in sham-irradiated hosts, suggesting that these small tumors may regress. Thus, had we been able to carry the irradiated mice to 10 weeks, the difference between the two groups would be even more dramatic.

COMMA-D Parental Heterogeneity Gives Rise to Subpopulations That Are Also Preferentially Tumorigenic in Irradiated Hosts.
Clonal COMMA-D subpopulations have been shown to retain the capacity to produce ductal outgrowths and to respond to hormone stimulation (38) , suggesting that some COMMA-D cells have multipotent characteristics of putative stem cells. The multipotent nature of these cells is also suggested by the observation that COMMA-D cell cultures contain multiple morphologically distinct cells consisting of flat, polygonal cells that form contact-inhibited monolayer islands and spindle-shaped cells that form ridges that surround the islands. This heterogeneity is maintained by routine passaging at 80–90% confluency. These cells are p53 positive and exhibit various levels of keratin and vimentin immunoreactivity (Fig. 4A and E)Citation . Keratin is observed predominantly in polygonal cells, whereas vimentin expression is less prominent and is associated with the ridges of spindle cells.

The possibility that these distinct cell types have different tumorigenic potentials or are preferentially selected during growth in vivo was addressed by testing their respective behaviors in CFPs. Morphologically distinct subpopulations were enriched from the parent population by differential trypsinization. Trypsinization releases spindle-shaped cells in the first 3 min (designated CD-3T), whereas predominantly polygonal cells remain after 5 min of trypsinization (designated CD-5R). Both cell types exhibited p53 immunoreactivity in culture (Fig. 4, E–G)Citation . The CD-3T subpopulation was primarily vimentin positive and keratin negative and had large nuclei (Fig. 4, B and F)Citation . The CD-5R subpopulation contained keratin-immunoreactive cells, with little expression of vimentin, and had small nuclei (Fig. 4, C and G)Citation .

Both the CD-3T and CD-5R subpopulations were significantly (P < 0.05) more tumorigenic in irradiated hosts when transplanted to sham- versus irradiated-hosts (Fig. 5)Citation . However, the CD-5R subpopulation produced fewer tumors (4 of 12) than the parent in irradiated CFPs and did not give rise to any tumors in the sham-host. The tumors from the CD-5R were also considerably smaller than either the parent or the CD-3T subpopulation (Fig. 5B)Citation . In contrast, the CD-3T subpopulation was more efficient (12 of 12) in generating tumors than the parent population (8 of 12) in this experiment. Furthermore, unlike the parent COMMA-D population, the size of tumors from the 3T-CD subpopulation were similar in the sham-irradiated CFPs and irradiated CFPs. Thus, the size of the tumors is influenced by both the nature of the microenvironment and of the epithelial population.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Tumor formation by COMMA-D parent cells and subpopulations, CD-3T and CD-5R, transplanted into CFPs in sham-irradiated hosts ({square}) or hosts irradiated 3 days before transplantation with 4 Gy ({blacksquare}). A, tumor incidence was significantly (P < 0.05) greater in irradiated versus sham hosts for all three populations. B, tumor size varied as a function of cell population and of irradiation status.

 
COMMA-D Cells Are Tumorigenic Only in the Irradiated CFPs of Hemibody-irradiated Mice.
Radiation might promote neoplastic behavior by causing aberrant immune or endocrine function. Partial (left versus right) body 60Co {gamma}-irradiation of anesthetized mice was used to test whether systemic factors from the irradiated host contributed to tumor promotion in irradiated CFPs. No tumors were found in nonirradiated CFPs (n = 8), whereas three tumors were observed in irradiated CFPs (P = 0.05). To determine whether the low incidence of tumor formation was attributable to the systemic effects of anesthesia necessary for hemibody irradiation, we asked whether anesthesia compromised tumor formation. Anesthetized, whole-body-irradiated mice formed tumors in two of eight transplanted CFPs, whereas unanesthetized, whole-body-irradiated mice in this experiment formed seven tumors in eight CFPs. Thus, the low incidence of tumors in the partial body protocol compared with whole-body exposures appears to be attributable to the use of general anesthesia; tumor incidence was restricted to CFPs on the irradiated side, indicating that local tissue effects were dominant over the systemic consequences of irradiation.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although the stroma has generally been considered a silent bystander during epithelial carcinogenesis, the concept that the microenvironment is central to maintenance of cellular function and tissue integrity provides the rationale for the idea that its disruption can contribute to neoplasia (8) . Indeed, it has been suggested that cancer may be a physiological response to an abnormal environment (6 , 14 , 39 , 40) , and evidence is accumulating that support such hypotheses (41) . Most studies of radiogenic carcinogenesis emphasize radiation-induced DNA damage because mutations are believed to initiate carcinogenesis. However, low doses of ionizing radiation alter the composition of tissue microenvironment by rapidly affecting cytokine production and activities (36 , 37) , ECM composition (25 , 37 , 42) , and expression of receptors that mediate cell-cell interactions (43, 44, 45) .

The studies reported here address the question of whether radiation-induced changes in the composition of the mammary microenvironment promote the expression of neoplastic potential. We showed that COMMA-D mammary epithelial cells, which retain normal developmental capacity, were nontumorigenic by standard assays (lack of tumor formation when injected s.c. or in juvenile CFPs). Small, infrequent (19%) tumors were obtained when COMMA-D cells were transplanted to adult CFPs, suggesting that the physiological status of the host can modulate COMMA-D neoplastic potential. Tumorigenic efficiency increased to 100% when unirradiated COMMA-D cells were transplanted to CFPs in irradiated hosts. Furthermore, tumor size also substantially increased in irradiated CFPs. The effect of radiation on enhanced tumorigenesis persisted for at least 14 days after a single radiation exposure. We concluded that this was attributable to radiation-induced changes in the mammary stroma by comparing the irradiated and nonirradiated CFPs after hemibody irradiation; tumors formed only in the CFPs from the irradiated side. Thus, radiation exposure altered the mammary microenvironment in a manner that promotes the neoplastic behavior of these mammary epithelial cells, which harbor defective p53.

Although clonal, COMMA-D cells exhibit morphological and phenotypic diversity in culture (30 , 38) . We therefore determined some of the characteristics of the tumors arising from COMMA-D cells and found that tumors maintained cytokeratin immunoreactivity whether they arose in normal or irradiated CFPs. We then used selective trypsinization to isolate the CD-3T vimentin-positive versus the CD-5R keratin-positive subpopulations and asked whether one population was selected and/or preferentially influenced by the irradiated microenvironment during growth in vivo. We found that both subpopulations were preferentially tumorigenic in irradiated hosts. Thus, differential selection of these particular phenotypes alone does not appear to be responsible for the preferential effect of the irradiated stroma on promoting COMMA-D neoplastic behavior. The two cell populations may, however, interact because tumors arising from each showed distinctly different characteristics from the parent. CD-5R were less tumorigenic and considerably smaller than the parent cell line. In contrast, the CD-3T subpopulations were somewhat more efficient than the parent cell line in establishing tumors, and unlike the parent, were as large in the sham-irradiated host as in the irradiated host.

Our previous studies showed that irradiated mammary gland undergoes rapid remodeling of the microenvironment characterized by changes in ECM and activation of latent TGF-ß (25 , 36) . We tested whether these events were functionally related by treating animals with TGF-ß neutralizing antibodies prior to irradiation (37) . TGF-ß panspecific neutralizing antibody administered shortly before irradiation inhibited collagen III staining in the adipose stroma at 24 h in an antibody dose-dependent manner and blocked collagen III through 7 days after irradiation. Quantitative image analysis demonstrated that exposure to radiation doses of as little as 0.1 Gy elicited a significant increase in TGF-ß immunoreactivity, which showed a linear dose response after exposure to 0.1–5 Gy without an apparent threshold of the mammary epithelium. Qualitative evaluation of the reciprocal pattern of latency-associated peptide and collagen III immunoreactivity in the adipose stroma, in contrast, demonstrated a threshold of 0.5 Gy. These data provide functional confirmation of the hypothesis that radiation induces TGF-ß activation and implicate TGF-ß as a mediator of tissue response to ionizing radiation.

TGF-ß orchestrates responses of multiple cell types and has emerged as a key coordinator of tissue response to damage during wound healing, inflammation, and development. Aspects of radiation remodeling parallel those associated with dermal wound healing (46) . Ionizing radiation effects on the tissue microenvironment that foster neoplastic behavior may be similar to those observed by other agents that elicit an activated stroma. Experimental animal models have demonstrated that carcinogenesis is enhanced by the activated stroma induced by wounding (12) , overexpression of platelet-derived growth factor (5) , or misregulation of stromelysin (41 , 47) .

Although the particular aspect of the irradiated mammary microenvironment that is stimulating COMMA-D tumorigenic conversion is unknown, the ability of radiation to induce TGF-ß activation may indeed play a role (36 , 48) . We have argued that the role of TGF-ß in cancer appears paradoxical in that normal epithelial cells are profoundly sensitive to TGF-ß growth inhibition, whereas cancer cells are generally TGF-ß resistant (49) because conversion during tumor progression is a critical juncture in establishing malignant behavior of certain epithelia, particularly skin and breast (50) . TGF-ß has been identified as a cancer-promoting agent in wounds (13 , 51 , 52) , and recent studies have implicated cyclosporin-induced TGF-ß in the increased frequency of neoplasms after immunosuppressive therapy (53) . TGF-ß also mediates phenotypic conversion of epithelial cells to vimentin-positive spindle cells (54) . Such a transition is observed in a transgenic keratinocyte model overexpressing TGF-ß activity in which the frequency of benign papillomas is suppressed after chemical carcinogenesis, but progression to more malignant spindle cell carcinomas is stimulated (55) . In the SCp2 cell line, a subclone of late-passage COMMA-D cells (56) , TGF-ß treatment stimulates the transition from nontumorigenic keratin-positive cells to tumorigenic, vimentin-positive cells.6 Studies to determine whether the carcinogenesis-promoting effect of radiation on stroma is attributable to TGF-ß activation are under way.

Our hemibody irradiation data support the conclusion that radiation alters the local tissue microenvironment in a way that compromises the restraints imposed by normal stroma on initiated epithelial cells. A role for stroma early in neoplastic progression has also been suggested in hematopoietic malignancies, which have been proposed to result from misregulation of adhesive properties by diseased or genetically aberrant stroma (57) . Conversely, the therapeutic benefit of IFN-{alpha} in chronic myeloid leukemia has been shown recently to be attributable in part to the reestablishment of cell adhesion signals (15) . Greenberger et al. (58) proposed a model of indirect {gamma}-irradiation leukemogenesis based on cocultures of heavily irradiated bone marrow stromal cell lines that selectively bound macrophage-colony-stimulating factor receptor-positive unirradiated hematopoietic progenitor cells, resulting in selection of tumorigenic subclones. Additional evidence that radiation effects on stroma alter the behavior of neoplastic cells comes from studies of tumor bed effect, in which stroma that is heavily irradiated prior to tumor transplantation inhibits tumor growth but fosters metastatic behavior (59) . Such studies support the conclusion that radiation has global and persistent consequences in terms of stromal function, which in turn can influence the expression of neoplastic potential.

In effect, these experiments demonstrate a bystander-type phenomena in vivo in which the products of irradiated cells can significantly alter the phenotype of unirradiated cells. On the basis of these data, we propose that radiation-induced microenvironments are evidence of an additional class of carcinogenic action, distinct from those leading to mutations or proliferation (60) . Studies in cell culture indicate that the frequency of morphological transformation can be modulated by restrictive conditions that select for preexisting cell variants (61) and that, conversely, normal cells may actively restrain the expression of the transformed cell phenotype (62) . In vivo studies by Cha et al. (63) show that mammary tumors with Hras1 gene mutations from N-nitroso-N-methylurea-treated rats arose from cells with preexisting Hras1 mutations that occurred during early development. Thus, although clearly mutagenic in its own right, N-nitroso-N-methylurea exposure led to the expansion and neoplastic progression of Hras1-mutation containing populations. In our studies, radiation did not directly induce additional mutagenic events because the epithelial cells were unirradiated. We propose that a further action of carcinogens, such as ionizing radiation, is to modify paracrine interactions between the stroma and epithelium in a manner that affects the frequency with which previously initiated cells progress (46) . Carcinogen-induced microenvironments are not necessarily mutagenic or mitogenic per se. Rather, changes in the microenvironment may promote neoplastic behavior by disrupting normal cell functions that are regulated through cell-cell contact, cell-ECM interactions, and growth factor signaling. Thus, if ionizing radiation induces a microenvironment that modifies restrictive interactions, then it may promote malignant phenotype in manner that is functionally equivalent to the acquisition of additional mutations in the initiated cell. Alternatively, the microenvironment elicited by carcinogen exposure could create novel selective pressures that would affect the features of a developing tumor. Disruption of solid tissue interactions is a heretofore unrecognized activity of radiation as a carcinogen and a novel avenue by which to explore new strategies for intervening in the neoplastic process.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Mina J. Bissell for critical reading of the manuscript and K. Chong for technical help.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grant CA-5184, by the United States Army Medical Research and Materiel Command under DAMD-17-96-1-6716, and the Office of Health and Environmental Research, Health Effects Research Division, of the United States Department of Energy under Contract DE-AC-03-76SF00098. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Life Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720. Phone: (510) 486-6371; Fax: (510) 486-6746; E-mail: mhbarcellos-hoff{at}lbl.gov Back

3 The abbreviations used are: ECM, extracellular matrix; CFP, cleared fat pad; TGF-ß, transforming growth factor-ß1; DAPI, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole. Back

4 E. J. Ehrhart and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff, unpublished data. Back

5 Unpublished observations. Back

6 S. Galosy, M. H. Barcellos-Hoff, Z. Werb, and M. J. Bissell, unpublished observations. Back

Received 7/19/99. Accepted 12/20/99.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Terzaghi M., Nettesheim P. Dynamics of neoplastic development in carcinogen-exposed tracheal mucosa. Cancer Res., 39: 3004-3010, 1979.
  2. Ullrich R. L. The rate of progression of radiation-transformed mammary epithelial cells is enhanced after low-dose-rate neutron irradiation. Radiat. Res., 105: 68-75, 1986.[Medline]
  3. Kamiya K., Yasukawa-Barnes J., Mitchen J. M., Gould M. N., Clifton K. H. Evidence that carcinogenesis involves an imbalance between epigenetic high-frequency initiation and suppression of promotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 92: 1332-1336, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. van den Hoof A. Stromal involvement in malignant growth. Adv. Cancer Res., 50: 159-196, 1988.[Medline]
  5. Skobe M., Fusenig N. E. Tumorigenic conversion of immortal human keratinocytes through stromal cell activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 1050-1055, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Schor S. L., Schor A. M., Howell A., Haggie J. The possible role of abnormal fibroblasts in the pathogenesis of breast cancer Rich M. A. Hager J. C. Lopez D. M. eds. . Breast Cancer: Scientific and Chemical Progress, : 142-157, Kluwer Academic Publishers Boston 1988.
  7. Schor S. L., Schor A. M., Howell A., Crowther D. Hypothesis. Persistent expression of fetal phenotypic characteristics by fibroblasts is associated with an increased susceptibility to neoplastic disease. Exp. Cell Biol., 55: 11-17, 1987.[Medline]
  8. Bissell M. J., Barcellos-Hoff M. H. The influence of extracellular matrix on gene expression: is structure the message?. J. Cell Sci., 8: 327-343, 1987.
  9. Ronnov-Jessen L. Stromal reaction to invasive cancer: the cellular origin of the myofibroblast and implications for tumor development. Breast J., 2: 320-339, 1996.
  10. Decosse J. J., Gossens C. L., Kuzma J. F., Unsworth D. Breast cancer: induction of differentiation by embryonic tissue. Science (Washington DC), 181: 1057-1058, 1973.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Cooper M., Pinkus H. Intrauterine transplantation of rat basal cell carcinoma as a model for reconversion of malignant to benign growth. Cancer Res., 37: 2544-2552, 1977.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dolberg D. S., Holingworth R., Hertle M., Bissell M. J. Wounding and its role in RSV-mediated tumor formation. Science (Washington DC), 230: 676-678, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Sieweke M. H., Bissell M. J. The tumor promoting effect of wounding: a possible role for TGFß induced fibrotic stroma. Crit. Rev. Oncog., 5: 297-311, 1994.[Medline]
  14. Sympson C. J., Bissell M. J., Werb Z. Mammary gland tumor formation in transgenic mice overexpressing stromelysin-1. Semin. Cancer Biol., 6: 159-163, 1995.[Medline]
  15. Bhatia R., McCarthy J. B., Verfaillie C. M. Interferon-{alpha} restores normal ß1 integrin-mediated inhibition of hematopoietic progenitor proliferation by the marrow microenvironment in chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood, 87: 3883-3891, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Weaver V. M., Petersen O. W., Wang F., Larabell C. A., Briand P., Damsky C., Bissell M. J. Reversion of the malignant phenotype of human breast cells in three-dimensional culture and in vivo by integrin blocking antibodies. J. Cell Biol., 137: 231-245, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Fry R. J. M., Ley R. D., Grube D., Staffeldt E. Studies on the multistage nature of radiation carcinogenesis. Carcinogen, 7: 155-165, 1982.
  18. Davis F. G., Boice J. D., Hrubec Z., Monson R. R. Cancer mortality in a radiation-exposed cohort of Massachusetts tuberculosis patients. Cancer Res., 49: 6130-6136, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Hoffman, D. A., Lonstein, J. E., Morin, M. M., Visscher, W., Harris, B. S. H., III, and Boice, J. D., Jr. Breast cancer in women with scoliosis exposed to multiple diagnostic rays. 81: 1307–1312, 1989.
  20. Boice J. D., Preston D., Davis G., Monson R. Frequent chest X-ray fluoroscopy and breast cancer incidence among tuberculosis patients in Massachusetts. Radiat. Res., 125: 214-222, 1991.[Medline]
  21. Mattsson A., Ruden B.-I., Wilking N., Rutqvist L. E. Radiation-induced breast cancer: long-term follow-up of radiation therapy for benign breast disease. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 1679-1685, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ullrich R. L., Storer J. B. Influence of gamma-irradiation on the development of neoplastic disease in mice. III. Dose rate effects. Radiat. Res., 80: 325-342, 1979.[Medline]
  23. Clifton K. H., Tanner M. A., Gould M. N. Assessment of radiogenic cancer initiation frequency per clonogenic rat mammary cell in vivo. Cancer Res., 46: 2390-2395, 1986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Gould M. N., Clifton K. H., Damiya K., Wang B., Zhang R. Quantitative and molecular comparison of initiation frequency of mammary carcinogenesis by radiation and chemical carcinogens. Radiat. Environ. Biophys., 30: 221-223, 1991.[Medline]
  25. Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Radiation-induced transforming growth factor ß and subsequent extracellular matrix reorganization in murine mammary gland. Cancer Res., 53: 3880-3886, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Barcellos-Hoff M. H., Aggeler J., Ram T. G., Bissell M. J. Functional differentiation and alveolar morphogenesis of primary mammary epithelial cells cultures on reconstituted basement membrane. Development (Camb.), 105: 223-235, 1989.[Abstract]
  27. Schmeichel K. L., Weaver V. M., Bissell M. J. Structural cues from the tissue microenvironment are essential determinants of the human mammary epithelial cell phenotype. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 3: 201-213, 1998.[Medline]
  28. Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Radiation-induced microenvironment remodeling in mammary gland. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 3: 165-175, 1998.[Medline]
  29. Danielson K. G., Oborn C. J., Durban E. M., Buetel J. S., Medina D. Epithelial mouse mammary cell line exhibiting normal morphogenesis in vivo and functional differentiation in vitro. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 81: 3756-3760, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Jerry D. J., Medina D., Butel J. S. p53 mutations in COMMA-D cells. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol., 30A: 87-89, 1994.
  31. Jerry J., Ozbun M. A., Kittrell F. S., Lane D. P., Medina D., Butel J. S. Mutations in p53 are frequent in the preneoplastic stage of mouse mammary tumor development. Cancer Res., 53: 3374-3381, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. DeOme K. B., Faulkin L. J. J., Bern H. A., Blair P. B. Development of mammary tumors from hyperplastic alveolar nodules transplanted into gland-free mammary fat pads of female C3H mice. Cancer Res., 19: 515-520, 1959.
  33. Banerjee M. R., Wood B. G., Lin F. G., Crump L. R. Organ culture of the whole mammary gland of the mouse. Tissue Cult. Assoc. Man., 2: 457-462, 1976.
  34. Motulsky, H. Intuitive Biostatistics. New York: Oxford University Press Inc., 1995.
  35. Medina D., Li M. L., Oborn C. J., Bissell M. J. Casein gene expression in mouse mammary epithelial cell lines: dependence upon extracellular matrix and cell type. Exp. Cell Res., 172: 192-203, 1987.[Medline]
  36. Barcellos-Hoff M. H., Derynck R., Tsang M. L-S., Weatherbee J. A. Transforming growth factor-ß activation in irradiated murine mammary gland. J. Clin. Investig., 93: 892-899, 1994.
  37. Ehrhart E. J., Carroll A., Segarini P., Tsang M. L-S., Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Latent transforming growth factor-ß activation in situ: quantitative and functional evidence following low dose irradiation. FASEB J., 11: 991-1002, 1997.[Abstract]
  38. Campbell S. M., Taha M. M., Medina D., Rosen J. M. A clonal derivative of mammary epithelial cell line COMMA-D retains stem cell characteristics of unique morphological and functional heterogeneity. Exp. Cell Res., 177: 109-121, 1988.[Medline]
  39. Farber E. Pre-cancerous steps in carcinogenesis. Their physiological adaptive nature. Biochem. Biophys. Acta, 738: 171-180, 1984.[Medline]
  40. Rubin H. Cancer as a dynamic developmental disorder. Cancer Res., 45: 2935-2942, 1985.[Free Full Text]
  41. Thomasset N., Lochter A., Sympson C. J., Lund L. R., Williams D. R., Behrendtsen O., Werb Z., Bissell M. J. Expression of autoactivated stromelysin-1 in mammary glands of transgenic mice leads to a reactive stroma during early development. J. Am. Sci., 153: 457-467, 1998.
  42. Ehrhart E. J., Gillette E. L., Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Immunohistochemical evidence of rapid extracellular matrix remodeling after iron-particle irradiation of mouse mammary gland. Radiat. Res., 145: 157-162, 1996.[Medline]
  43. Schmidt-Ullrich R. K., Valerie K., Fogleman P. B., Walters J. Radiation-induced autophosphorylation of epidermal growth factor receptor in human malignant mammary and squamous epithelial cells. Radiat. Res., 145: 81-85, 1996.[Medline]
  44. Schmidt-Ullrich R. K., Valerie K., Chan W., Wazer D. E., Lin P-S. Expression of oestrogen receptor and transforming growth factor-{alpha} in MCF-7 cells after exposure to fractionated irradiation. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 61: 405-415, 1992.[Medline]
  45. Akimoto T., Mitsuhashi N., Saito Y., Ebara T., Niibe H. Effect of radiation on the expression of E-cadherin and {alpha}-catenin and invasive capacity in human lung cancer cell line in vitro. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 41: 1171-1176, 1998.[Medline]
  46. Barcellos-Hoff M. H. How do tissues respond to damage at the cellular level? The role of cytokines in irradiated tissues. Radiat. Res., 150: S109-S120, 1998.[Medline]
  47. Lochter A., Galosy S., Muschler J., Freedman N., Werb Z., Bissell M. J. Matrix metalloproteinase stromelysin-1 triggers a cascade of molecular alterations that leads to stable epithelial-to-mesenchymal conversion and premalignant phenotype in mammary epithelial cells. J. Cell Biol., 139: 1861-1872, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Latency and activation in the regulation of TGF-ß. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 3: 353-363, 1996.
  49. Fynan T. M., Reiss M. Resistance to inhibition of cell growth by transforming growth factor-ß and its role in oncogenesis. Crit. Rev. Oncog., 4: 493-540, 1993.[Medline]
  50. Reiss M., Barcellos-Hoff M. H. Transforming growth factor-ß in breast cancer: a working hypothesis. Br. Cancer Res. Treat., 45: 81-95, 1997.[Medline]
  51. Furstenberger G., Rogers M., Schnapki R., Bauer G., Hofler P., Marks F. Stimulatory role of transforming growth factors in multistage skin carcinogenesis: possible explanation for the tumor-inducing effect of wounding in initiated NMRI mouse skin. Int. J. Cancer, 43: 915-921, 1989.[Medline]
  52. Sieweke M. H., Thompson N. L., Sporn M. B., Bissell M. J. Mediation of wound-related Rous sarcoma virus tumorigenesis and TGF-ß. Science (Washington DC), 248: 1656-1660, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  53. Hojo M., Morimoto T., Maluccio M., Asano T., Morimoto K., Lagman M., Shimbo T., Suthanthiran M. Cyclosporine induces cancer progression by a cell-autonomous mechanism. Nature (Lond.), 397: 530-534, 1999.[Medline]
  54. Miettinen P. J., Ebner R., Lopez A. R., Derynck R. TGF-ß induced transdifferentiation of mammary epithelial cells to mesenchymal cells: involvement of type I receptors. J. Cell Biol., 127: 2021-2036, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  55. Cui W., Fowlis D. J., Bryson S., Duffie E., Ireland H., Balmain A., Akhurst R. J. TGFß1 inhibits the formation of benign skin tumors but enhances progression to invasive spindle carcinomas in transgenic mice. Cell, 86: 531-542, 1996.[Medline]
  56. Desprez P., Hara E., Bissell M. J., Campisi J. Suppression of mammary epithelial cell differentiation by the helix-loop-helix protein Id-1. Mol. Cell. Biol., 15: 3398-3404, 1995.[Abstract]
  57. Gordon M. Y., Dowding C. R., Riley G. P., Goldman J. M., Greaves M. F. Altered adhesive interactions with marrow stroma of haematopoietic progenitor cells in chronic myeloid leukaemia. Nature (Lond.), 328: 342-344, 1987.[Medline]
  58. Greenberger J., Epperly M., Zeevi A., Brunson K., Goltry K., Pogue-Geile K., Bray J., Berry L. Stromal cell involvement in leukemogenesis and carcinogenesis. In Vivo, 10: 11-17, 1996.
  59. Leith J. T., Michelson S. Tumor radiocurability: relationship to intrinsic tumor heterogeneity and to the tumor bed effect. Invasion Metastasis, 10: 329-351, 1990.[Medline]
  60. Barcellos-Hoff M. H. The potential influence of radiation-induced microenvironments in neoplastic progression. J. Mammary Gland Biol. Neoplasia, 3: 165-175, 1998.
  61. Chow M., Rubin H. The cellular ecology of progressive neoplastic transformation: a clonal analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 2093-2098, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  62. Bauer G. Elimination of transformed cells by normal cells: a novel concept for the control of carcinogenesis. Histol. Histopathol., 11: 237-255, 1996.[Medline]
  63. Cha R. S., Thilly W. G., Zarbl H. N-Nitroso-N-methylurea-induced rat mammary tumors arise from cells with preexisting oncogenic Hras1 gene mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 3749-3753, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Carpentino, M. J. Hynes, H. D. Appelman, T. Zheng, D. A. Steindler, E. W. Scott, and E. H. Huang
Aldehyde Dehydrogenase-Expressing Colon Stem Cells Contribute to Tumorigenesis in the Transition from Colitis to Cancer
Cancer Res., October 15, 2009; 69(20): 8208 - 8215.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Hasegawa, K. Maruyama, H. Takenaka, T. Furukawa, and T. Saga
A medaka model of cancer allowing direct observation of transplanted tumor cells in vivo at a cellular-level resolution
PNAS, August 18, 2009; 106(33): 13832 - 13837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. Tubiana, L. E. Feinendegen, C. Yang, and J. M. Kaminski
The Linear No-Threshold Relationship Is Inconsistent with Radiation Biologic and Experimental Data
Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 13 - 22.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Histochem. Cytochem.Home page
T. M. Tancred, A. R. Belch, T. Reiman, L. M. Pilarski, and J. Kirshner
Altered Expression of Fibronectin and Collagens I and IV in Multiple Myeloma and Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance
J. Histochem. Cytochem., March 1, 2009; 57(3): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. Poglio, S. Galvani, S. Bour, M. Andre, B. Prunet-Marcassus, L. Penicaud, L. Casteilla, and B. Cousin
Adipose Tissue Sensitivity to Radiation Exposure
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2009; 174(1): 44 - 53.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. C. Kim, R. J. Clark, E. A. Ranheim, and C. M. Alexander
Wnt1 Expression Induces Short-Range and Long-Range Cell Recruitments That Modify Mammary Tumor Development and Are Not Induced by a Cell-Autonomous {beta}-Catenin Effector
Cancer Res., December 15, 2008; 68(24): 10145 - 10153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
N. Cheng, A. Chytil, Y. Shyr, A. Joly, and H. L. Moses
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Signaling-Deficient Fibroblasts Enhance Hepatocyte Growth Factor Signaling in Mammary Carcinoma Cells to Promote Scattering and Invasion
Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 6(10): 1521 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
X. Guo, H. Oshima, T. Kitmura, M. M. Taketo, and M. Oshima
Stromal Fibroblasts Activated by Tumor Cells Promote Angiogenesis in Mouse Gastric Cancer
J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2008; 283(28): 19864 - 19871.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Jo, Y. Jia, K. K. Subramanian, H. Hattori, and H. R. Luo
Cancer Cell-Derived Clusterin Modulates the Phosphatidylinositol 3'-Kinase-Akt Pathway through Attenuation of Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 during Serum Deprivation
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 1, 2008; 28(13): 4285 - 4299.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J.-P. Coppe, M. Boysen, C. H. Sun, B. J.F. Wong, M. K. Kang, N.-H. Park, P.-Y. Desprez, J. Campisi, and A. Krtolica
A Role for Fibroblasts in Mediating the Effects of Tobacco-Induced Epithelial Cell Growth and Invasion
Mol. Cancer Res., July 1, 2008; 6(7): 1085 - 1098.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
M.-P. Wu, M.-J. Young, C.-C. Tzeng, C.-R. Tzeng, K.-F. Huang, L.-W. Wu, and C.-Y. Chou
A novel role of thrombospondin-1 in cervical carcinogenesis: inhibit stroma reaction by inhibiting activated fibroblasts from invading cancer
Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1115 - 1123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
V. Gioni, T. Karampinas, G. Voutsinas, A. E. Roussidis, S. Papadopoulos, N. K. Karamanos, and D. Kletsas
Imatinib Mesylate Inhibits Proliferation and Exerts an Antifibrotic Effect in Human Breast Stroma Fibroblasts
Mol. Cancer Res., May 1, 2008; 6(5): 706 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Bierie, D. G. Stover, T. W. Abel, A. Chytil, A. E. Gorska, M. Aakre, E. Forrester, L. Yang, K.-U. Wagner, and H. L. Moses
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta} Regulates Mammary Carcinoma Cell Survival and Interaction with the Adjacent Microenvironment
Cancer Res., March 15, 2008; 68(6): 1809 - 1819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
J. Wels, R. N. Kaplan, S. Rafii, and D. Lyden
Migratory neighbors and distant invaders: tumor-associated niche cells
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2008; 22(5): 559 - 574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. J. Coates, J. K. Rundle, S. A. Lorimore, and E. G. Wright
Indirect Macrophage Responses to Ionizing Radiation: Implications for Genotype-Dependent Bystander Signaling
Cancer Res., January 15, 2008; 68(2): 450 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Koyama, N. Kobayashi, M. Harada, M. Takeoka, Y. Kawai, K. Sano, M. Fujimori, J. Amano, T. Ohhashi, R. Kannagi, et al.
Significance of Tumor-Associated Stroma in Promotion of Intratumoral Lymphangiogenesis: Pivotal Role of a Hyaluronan-Rich Tumor Microenvironment
Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2008; 172(1): 179 - 193.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Kaneko, Z. Zhang, M. G. Mantellini, E. Karl, B. Zeitlin, M. Verhaegen, M. S. Soengas, M. Lingen, R. M. Strieter, G. Nunez, et al.
Bcl-2 Orchestrates a Cross-talk between Endothelial and Tumor Cells that Promotes Tumor Growth
Cancer Res., October 15, 2007; 67(20): 9685 - 9693.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. L. Andarawewa, A. C. Erickson, W. S. Chou, S. V. Costes, P. Gascard, J. D. Mott, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff
Ionizing Radiation Predisposes Nonmalignant Human Mammary Epithelial Cells to Undergo Transforming Growth Factor {beta} Induced Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition
Cancer Res., September 15, 2007; 67(18): 8662 - 8670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C.-Q. Zhu, S. N. Popova, E. R. S. Brown, D. Barsyte-Lovejoy, R. Navab, W. Shih, M. Li, M. Lu, I. Jurisica, L. Z. Penn, et al.
Integrin {alpha}11 regulates IGF2 expression in fibroblasts to enhance tumorigenicity of human non-small-cell lung cancer cells
PNAS, July 10, 2007; 104(28): 11754 - 11759.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
D. Mahadevan and D. D. Von Hoff
Tumor-stroma interactions in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2007; 6(4): 1186 - 1197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
P. Conti, M. L. Castellani, D. Kempuraj, V. Salini, J. Vecchiet, S. Tete, F. Mastrangelo, A. Perrella, M. A. De Lutiis, M. Tagen, et al.
Role of Mast Cells in Tumor Growth
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2007; 37(4): 315 - 322.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J.-P. Coppe, K. Kauser, J. Campisi, and C. M. Beausejour
Secretion of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor by Primary Human Fibroblasts at Senescence
J. Biol. Chem., October 6, 2006; 281(40): 29568 - 29574.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. M. Blakely, A. J. Stoddard, G. K. Belka, K. D. Dugan, K. L. Notarfrancesco, S. E. Moody, C. M. D'Cruz, and L. A. Chodosh
Hormone-Induced Protection against Mammary Tumorigenesis Is Conserved in Multiple Rat Strains and Identifies a Core Gene Expression Signature Induced by Pregnancy.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6421 - 6431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
A. Y. Khakoo, S. Pati, S. A. Anderson, W. Reid, M. F. Elshal, I. I. Rovira, A. T. Nguyen, D. Malide, C. A. Combs, G. Hall, et al.
Human mesenchymal stem cells exert potent antitumorigenic effects in a model of Kaposi's sarcoma
J. Exp. Med., May 15, 2006; 203(5): 1235 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
C. Sonnenschein and A. M. Soto
Carcinogenesis and Metastasis Now in the Third Dimension--What's in It for Pathologists?
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 168(2): 363 - 366.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
S. M. McDaniel, K. K. Rumer, S. L. Biroc, R. P. Metz, M. Singh, W. Porter, and P. Schedin
Remodeling of the Mammary Microenvironment after Lactation Promotes Breast Tumor Cell Metastasis
Am. J. Pathol., February 1, 2006; 168(2): 608 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Bavik, I. Coleman, J. P. Dean, B. Knudsen, S. Plymate, and P. S. Nelson
The Gene Expression Program of Prostate Fibroblast Senescence Modulates Neoplastic Epithelial Cell Proliferation through Paracrine Mechanisms
Cancer Res., January 15, 2006; 66(2): 794 - 802.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Bio.Home page
B. Bartling, N. Demling, R.-E. Silber, and A. Simm
Proliferative Stimulus of Lung Fibroblasts on Lung Cancer Cells Is Impaired by the Receptor for Advanced Glycation End-Products
Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., January 1, 2006; 34(1): 83 - 91.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
R Serra and M R Crowley
Mouse models of transforming growth factor {beta} impact in breast development and cancer
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2005; 12(4): 749 - 760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. V. Maffini, J. M. Calabro, A. M. Soto, and C. Sonnenschein
Stromal Regulation of Neoplastic Development: Age-Dependent Normalization of Neoplastic Mammary Cells by Mammary Stroma
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2005; 167(5): 1405 - 1410.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. K.C. Tsai, E. Y.-Y. Chuang, J. B. Little, and Z.-M. Yuan
Cellular Mechanisms for Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation-Induced Perturbation of the Breast Tissue Microenvironment
Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 65(15): 6734 - 6744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
Y. Tu, D. J. Jerry, B. Pazik, and S. Smith Schneider
Sensitivity to DNA Damage Is a Common Component of Hormone-Based Strategies for Protection of the Mammary Gland
Mol. Cancer Res., August 1, 2005; 3(8): 435 - 442.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
M. EGEBLAD, L.E. LITTLEPAGE, and Z. WERB
The Fibroblastic Coconspirator in Cancer Progression
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 383 - 388.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
C. Sonnenschein and A. M. Soto
Are Times a' Changin' in Carcinogenesis?
Endocrinology, January 1, 2005; 146(1): 11 - 12.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Medina and F. Kittrell
Stroma is not a major target in DMBA-mediated tumorigenesis of mouse mammary preneoplasia
J. Cell Sci., January 1, 2005; 118(1): 123 - 127.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
N. Jessani, M. Humphrey, W. H. McDonald, S. Niessen, K. Masuda, B. Gangadharan, J. R. Yates III, B. M. Mueller, and B. F. Cravatt
Carcinoma and stromal enzyme activity profiles associated with breast tumor growth in vivo
PNAS, September 21, 2004; 101(38): 13756 - 13761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. V. Maffini, A. M. Soto, J. M. Calabro, A. A. Ucci, and C. Sonnenschein
The stroma as a crucial target in rat mammary gland carcinogenesis
J. Cell Sci., March 15, 2004; 117(8): 1495 - 1502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
N. A. Bhowmick, A. Chytil, D. Plieth, A. E. Gorska, N. Dumont, S. Shappell, M. K. Washington, E. G. Neilson, and H. L. Moses
TGF-{beta} Signaling in Fibroblasts Modulates the Oncogenic Potential of Adjacent Epithelia
Science, February 6, 2004; 303(5659): 848 - 851.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. d. L. Davies, L. M. Lundstrom, J. Frengen, L. Eikenes, O. S. Bruland, O. Kaalhus, M. H. B. Hjelstuen, and C. Brekken
Radiation Improves the Distribution and Uptake of Liposomal Doxorubicin (Caelyx) in Human Osteosarcoma Xenografts
Cancer Res., January 15, 2004; 64(2): 547 - 553.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
C. C. Park, R. L. Henshall-Powell, A. C. Erickson, R. Talhouk, B. Parvin, M. J. Bissell, and M. H. Barcellos-Hoff
Ionizing radiation induces heritable disruption of epithelial cell interactions
PNAS, September 16, 2003; 100(19): 10728 - 10733.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
G. Zhang, B. He, and G. F. Weber
Growth Factor Signaling Induces Metastasis Genes in Transformed Cells: Molecular Connection between Akt Kinase and Osteopontin in Breast Cancer
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2003; 23(18): 6507 - 6519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
K. L. Schmeichel and M. J. Bissell
Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions
J. Cell Sci., June 15, 2003; 116(12): 2377 - 2388.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
J. E. Morgan, J. G. Gross, C. N. Pagel, J. R. Beauchamp, A. Fassati, A. J. Thrasher, J. P. Di Santo, I. B. Fisher, X. Shiwen, D. J. Abraham, et al.
Myogenic cell proliferation and generation of a reversible tumorigenic phenotype are triggered by preirradiation of the recipient site
J. Cell Biol., May 13, 2002; 157(4): 693 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
H. Rubin
Synergistic mechanisms in carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and by tobacco smoke: a bio-historical perspective with updates
Carcinogenesis, December 1, 2001; 22(12): 1903 - 1930.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
C. M. Markey, E. H. Luque, M. Munoz de Toro, C. Sonnenschein, and A. M. Soto
In Utero Exposure to Bisphenol A Alters the Development and Tissue Organization of the Mouse Mammary Gland
Biol Reprod, October 1, 2001; 65(4): 1215 - 1223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Laconi, P. Pani, S. Pillai, D. Pasciu, D. S. R. Sarma, and E. Laconi
A growth-constrained environment drives tumor progression invivo
PNAS, June 20, 2001; (2001) 131210498.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Rubin
Selected Cell and Selective Microenvironment in Neoplastic Development
Cancer Res., February 1, 2001; 61(3): 799 - 807.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
B. Elenbaas, L. Spirio, F. Koerner, M. D. Fleming, D. B. Zimonjic, J. L. Donaher, N. C. Popescu, W. C. Hahn, and R. A. Weinberg
Human breast cancer cells generated by oncogenic transformation of primary mammary epithelial cells
Genes & Dev., January 1, 2001; 15(1): 50 - 65.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. Laconi, P. Pani, S. Pillai, D. Pasciu, D. S. R. Sarma, and E. Laconi
A growth-constrained environment drives tumor progression invivo
PNAS, July 3, 2001; 98(14): 7806 - 7811.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Barcellos-Hoff, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ravani, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Barcellos-Hoff, M. H.
Right arrow Articles by Ravani, S. A.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online