
[Cancer Research 60, 1326-1331, March 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Experimental Therapeutics |
Preferential Enhancement of Tumor Radioresponse by a Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor
Kazushi Kishi,
Sven Petersen,
Cordula Petersen,
Nancy Hunter,
Kathryn Mason,
Jaime L. Masferrer,
Philip J. Tofilon and
Luka Milas1
Department of Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 [K. K., S. P., C. P., N. H., K. M., P. J. T., L. M.], Pharma Research and Development, Searle, Monsanto, St. Louis, Missouri 63167 [J. L. M.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), an inducible isoform of cyclooxygenase, is
overexpressed in many types of malignant tumors, where it mediates
production of prostaglandins (PGs), which in turn may stimulate tumor
growth and protect against damage by cytotoxic agents. This study
investigated whether SC-'236, a selective inhibitor of COX-2,
potentiates antitumor efficacy of radiation without increasing
radiation injury to normal tissue. Mice bearing the sarcoma FSA in the
hind legs were treated daily for 10 days with SC-'236 (6 mg/kg given in
the drinking water) when tumors were 6 mm in diameter. When tumors
reached 8 mm in diameter, the mice were given 11- to 50-Gy single-dose
local tumor irradiation with or without SC-'236. SC-'236 inhibited
tumor growth on its own, and it greatly enhanced the effect of tumor
irradiation. The growth delay was increased from 14.8 days after 25-Gy
single dose to 28.4 days after the combined treatment
(P = 0.01). SC-'236 reduced
TCD50 (radiation dose yielding 50% tumor cure) from 39.2
Gy to 20.9 Gy (enhancement factor = 1.87). SC-'236 did
not appreciably alter radiation damage to jejunal crypt cells and
tissue involved in the development of radiation-induced leg
contractures. The SC-'236-induced enhancement of tumor radioresponse
was associated with a decrease in PGE2 levels in FSA
tumors. The drug had no effect on radiation-induced apoptosis.
Neoangiogenesis was inhibited by SC-'236, which could account for some
of the increase in tumor radioresponse. Overall, our findings
demonstrated that treatment with a selective inhibitor of COX-2 greatly
enhanced tumor radioresponse without markedly affecting normal tissue
radioresponse. Thus, COX-2 inhibitors have a high potential for
increasing the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Recently, it was established that there exist two isoforms of the
enzymes that synthesize
PGs:2
COX-1 and COX-2. COX-1 is a ubiquitous constitutive enzyme that has a
housekeeping physiological function, whereas COX-2 is an inducible form
that is induced by diverse inflammatory stimuli, oncoproteins, and
growth factors (1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
.
Increasing evidence shows that COX-2 promotes carcinogenesis as well as
the growth of established tumors (3
, 6)
. COX-2 is
up-regulated in a high percentage of common cancers in humans and is
associated with invasive and metastatic tumor behavior
(7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
. Thus, the specific expression of COX-2 in tumors
but not in normal tissue may serve as a potential target for anticancer
therapy. Newly developed selective inhibitors of COX-2 have been shown
to prevent carcinogenesis and to slow the growth of tumors in
experimental animals (12, 13, 14, 15)
. There is evidence that the
mechanism involves PGs, which can modulate cellular injury induced by a
wide array of agents, including ionizing radiation
(16, 17, 18)
. A number of natural PGs and their synthetic
analogues have shown the ability to protect cells and tissue from
radiation injury (16
, 18)
. With respect to cancer,
production of PG by tumors was found to be associated with tumor
radioresistance (16
, 17
, 19)
. Tumors were made more
responsive to radiation when their production of PGs was suppressed by
NSAIDs such as indomethacin (17
, 20
, 21) . In addition,
NSAIDs increased in vitro radiosensitivity of cancer cells
(22)
.
Because indomethacin and other commonly used NSAIDs inhibit both COX-1
and COX-2, treatment with these agents may be limited by normal tissue
toxicity, particularly that of the gastrointestinal tract (3
, 13
, 14)
. Because selective COX-2 inhibitors exert potent
anti-inflammatory activity but cause fewer unwanted side effects
(1
, 15)
, they may be more suitable as anticancer agents,
both in prevention of carcinogenesis and in cancer therapy, than
standard NSAIDs. In a short communication, we recently reported that
SC-'236, a selective COX-2 inhibitor, dramatically enhanced radiation
response of a murine sarcoma, designated NFSA (23)
.
Because the therapeutic potential of SC-'236 might ultimately depend on
the response of both tumor and normal tissue, in the present study we
investigated the effect in mice of SC-'236 on radioresponse of another
sarcoma, designated FSA, and on radioresponse of normal tissues,
notably jejunal mucosa and tissue responsible for radiation-induced leg
contracture. The present study also explored the mechanism by which
SC-'236 enhances tumor radioresponse.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Mice and Tumors
Inbred C3Hf/Kam mice, bred and maintained in our own specific
pathogen-free mouse colony, were used. The mice were 34 months of age
and weighed 2734 g at the beginning of the experiments. The mice were
housed five per cage and fed sterilized pelleted food (Prolabs Animal
Diet; Agway, Syracuse, NY). The tumor was an immunogenic sarcoma,
designated FSA, induced by methylcholanthrene in this strain of mice.
The FSA tumor produces high levels of PGE2
(24)
and was used in our earlier studies that assessed the
therapeutic potential of indomethacin when combined with radiation
(20
, 21)
. When used for these experiments, the tumor was
in its sixth isotransplant generation. Solitary tumors were generated
in the muscles of the right thighs of mice by the inoculation of
3 x 105 viable tumor cells
(25)
. Tumor cell suspensions were prepared by enzymatic
preparation of nonnecrotic tumor tissue; cell viability was >95% as
determined by trypan blue exclusion and phase microscopy.
COX-2 Inhibitor
Mice were given SC-'236 at a dose of 6 mg/kg body weight
(Searle, Skokie, IL) or vehicle (0.05% Tween 20 and 0.95%
polyethylene glycol; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in the drinking
water. To achieve this dose, SC-'236 was dissolved in a stock solution
of 5% Tween 20 and 95% polyethylene glycol and diluted in distilled
water to achieve a final SC-'236 concentration of 0.045 mg/ml The mice
drank
4 ml/day of this diluted solution. Depending on the individual
experiment, the treatment with SC-'236 lasted 6.5 or 10 days. Water
bottles were changed every 3 days. The treatment with SC-'236 for 10
days caused no drug-related mortality: only 1 of 67 mice treated with
SC-'236 in tumor growth delay and TCD50
experiments died from unknown causes.
Tumor Response to Radiation
The effect of SC-'236 on tumor radioresponse was determined
using tumor growth delay and a TCD50 assay. When
leg tumors grew to 6 to 6.3 mm in diameter, mice were treated with
SC-'236 (6 mg/kg) or vehicle daily for 10 consecutive days. When these
tumors grew to 8 mm in diameter, which occurred between 2 and 3 days in
vehicle-treated mice and between 2 and 5 days in treated mice, mice
were exposed to a 25-Gy single dose (tumor growth delay experiment) or
an 11- to 50-Gy single dose of
-radiation
(TCD50 assay). Irradiation to the tumor was
delivered from a dual-source 137Cs irradiator at
a dose rate of 6.31 Gy/min. During irradiation, unanesthetized mice
were immobilized in a jig, and the tumor was centered in a circular
radiation field 3 cm in diameter.
To obtain tumor growth curves, three mutually orthogonal diameters of
tumors were measured at 1-, 2-, or 3-day intervals with a vernier
caliper, and the mean values were calculated. Regression and regrowth
of tumors were followed until tumor diameter reached
14 mm. Tumor
growth delay was expressed as the time in days for tumors treated with
radiation to grow from 8 to 12 mm in diameter minus the time in days
for untreated tumors to reach the same size. This was termed the
absolute tumor growth delay. The effect of the combined SC-'236 plus
irradiation treatment was expressed as the normalized tumor growth
delay, defined as the time for tumors treated with both SC-'236
and radiation to grow from 8 to 12 mm in diameter minus the time in
days for tumors treated with SC-'236 alone to reach the same size.
Groups consisted of seven or eight mice each.
In the TCD50 assay, the mice were checked for the
presence of tumor at the irradiated site at 2- to 7-day intervals after
irradiation for up to 120 days. Each TCD50 assay
contained 52 mice.
Normal Tissue Response to Radiation
Jejunum.
The microcolony assay introduced by Withers and Elkind
(26)
was used to determine the survival of crypt
epithelial cells in the jejunum of mice exposed to radiation.
Non-tumor-bearing mice were exposed to WBI with single doses of X-rays
ranging from 9.5 to 13.5 Gy given at a dose rate of 1.62 Gy/min. The
mice were given SC-'236 (6 mg/kg) in drinking water for 6.5 consecutive
days, starting 3 days before WBI, and were killed by
CO2 inhalation 3.5 days after WBI. The jejunum
was prepared for histological examination, and the regenerating crypts
in the jejunal cross-section were counted. To construct radiation
survival curves, we converted the number of regenerating crypts to the
number of surviving cells by applying a Poisson correction for the
number of crypts regenerating from more than one stem cell. Lines were
fitted to data points by least squares regression analysis.
Leg Contracture.
Radiation-induced leg contraction (reduction in the leg extension) was
determined on mice in the TCD50 assays for FSA
(present study) and NFSA (23)
that had no recurrent tumors
present. The measurement was performed 120 days after irradiation, when
leg contracture was at a plateau. Extensibility of both the treated
right- and the control left-hind leg in each mouse was measured using
the jig device described previously (27)
. The tail was
placed between two vertical posts and held taut while each leg was
extended against a millimeter ruler embedded in the base. Both the
control and the irradiated leg could be extended easily to a certain
point beyond which there was considerably greater resistance to further
extension. Readings were made at this point, measuring to the tip of
the central digit, and were reproducible to within ± 1
mm when repeated by the same person or a different individual.
Irradiation doses ranged from 16 to 65 Gy in the treatment group
versus 3080 Gy in control.
 |
COX-2 Analysis
|
|---|
Western blot analysis was used to determine whether FSA tumors
expressed the COX-2 isoform. Fresh nonnecrotic tumor tissue was derived
from 8- to 9-mm tumors growing in the right hind leg of mice. The
tissue was homogenized using a glass-on-glass tissue homogenizer and
thawed in ice-cold lysis buffer [50 mM HEPES, 0.4 M NaCl,
1 mM EDTA (pH 7.9)] containing 2 µg/ml aprotinin, 2
µg/ml leupeptin, 2 µg/ml benzamidine, 5 µg/ml
phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM DTT, and 10 µl/100
µl NP40 (10%). Lysates were sonicated for 30 s on ice and
centrifuged at 14,000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C to remove the particulate
material. The protein concentration of the supernatant in the sample
was measured by the Bio-Rad DC Kit (Bio-Rad Laboratories) according to
the manufacturers instructions, using BSA as a standard. Eighty
micrograms of protein were electrophoresed on a 12% SDS-polyacrylamide
gel and then electrophoretically transferred to a polyvinylidene
difluoride membrane. Filters were incubated for 5 h at room
temperature in blocking solution (Tris-buffered saline containing 5%
nonfat dried milk and 0.05% Tween 20). Primary antibody to COX-2
(Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) was used at a final dilution of 1:2000
overnight in blocking solution. Filters were washed three times and
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated rabbit antihuman IgG
as a secondary antibody (1:2000) for 40 min. After three additional
washes, the signal was revealed using the enhanced chemiluminescence
detection system ECL-Plus (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). The
membrane image was digitized and stored in a computer and quantified by
imaging software. Ovine recombinant COX-2 (Oxford BioMed, Oxford, MI)
was used as a positive control. The same procedure was used to
determine COX-2 expression in FSA cells grown in vitro and
thus deprived of normal cells. Tumor cells were analyzed for the
in vitro response to
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate, known to induce
COX-2 expression (28)
.
 |
PGE2 Analysis
|
|---|
To determine the effect of SC-'236 on the catalytic activity of
COX-2, the production of PGE2 was measured in FSA
tumors treated with SC-'236 or vehicle for 3 days. The methods for
measurement of PGE2 have been described
previously (29)
. In brief, FSA tumor tissue was
homogenized, washed in DMEM, and incubated in 30 µM
arachidonic acid for 10 min at 37°C. Supernatants were collected and
kept at -20°C until tested. PGE2 formed by the
reaction was determined by a commercial ELISA.
 |
Histological Determination of Apoptosis
|
|---|
For histological examinations, the tumors were removed and fixed
in neutral-buffered 10% formalin. The tissue was embedded in paraffin
blocks; 4-µm sections were cut from these blocks and stained with
H&E. The morphological features used to identify apoptosis in murine
tumors have been described previously (30
, 31)
. Five
fields of nonnecrotic areas were selected randomly across each tumor
section, and apoptotic cells in each field were expressed as a
percentage based on scoring of 1000 nuclei.
 |
Tumor Angiogenesis
|
|---|
An intradermal assay (21
, 32)
was used to assess
the effect of SC-'236 on tumor angiogenesis. A triangular skin flap was
created on the right abdominal region of mice anesthetized with
Nembutal (0.06 mg/body weight) by making a skin incision along the
midline of the abdomen and extending it to the right groin. The skin
flap was separated from the s.c. tissue by a gentle pull laterally and
then was searched for an area with the fewest tiny blood vessels as
determined using a dissecting microscope with a magnification of x20.
After the number of blood vessels at the tumor cell injection site was
recorded, 106 FSA cells were injected
intradermally in a volume of 0.03 ml of PBS, using a 30-gauge needle.
The skin flap was then brought back to the midline and closed with
surgical clips. One day after the injection of tumor cells, the mice
began receiving treatments with SC-'236 (6 mg/kg) in the drinking
water, which continued daily for 9 consecutive days. The number of
blood vessels as well as tumor size was determined at 2, 4, 6, 8, and
10 days after tumor cell injection. This was performed under a
dissecting microscope (x20) in anesthetized animals in which the skin
flap was reopened by removing the surgical clips and pulling the flap
laterally. The tumor volume was calculated using the formula for an
elliptical mass (1/6
abc).
 |
Statistical Methods
|
|---|
Statistical analysis was performed using Statistica 5.1
(StatSoft, Tulsa, OK). Comparison of means was carried out by
t test; the TCD50 was calculated using
maximum likelihood analysis. Differences with P values
<0.05 were considered statistically significant.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Tumor Response to Radiation.
To determine whether SC-'236 affects the growth of FSA, mice bearing
6.3-mm mean diameter tumors were given SC-'236 (6 mg/ml) or vehicle in
the drinking water for 10 consecutive days. As shown in Fig. 1A
, SC-'236 slowed the growth of FSA; the effect was evident
within 2 days from the start of the treatment. Tumors in the control
group doubled in size (from 6.3 to 12.6 mm) in 5.4 ± 0.5 days; those in the SC-'236-treated group doubled in 7.7 ± 0.5 days (P = 0.02).

View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. A, effect of SC-'236 on FSA growth in
C3HF/Kam mice. The treatment with SC-'236 ( ), 6 mg/kg in drinking
water, was started when tumors were 6.3 mm in diameter and was
continued for 10 days. , tumor growth in control mice.
B, effect of combination of SC-'236 treatment and local
tumor irradiation on tumor growth of FSA tumors. Mice were treated with
vehicle (), SC-'236 ( ), 25-Gy single-dose irradiation ( ), or
SC-'236 plus 25-Gy single-dose irradiation ( ). The treatment with
SC-'236, 6 mg/kg in drinking water, was started when tumors were 6 mm
in diameter and was continued for 10 days. Irradiation was delivered
when tumors were 8 mm in diameter. Bars, SE of the mean
values.
|
|
The next experiment tested the effect of SC-'236 on the radioresponse
of FSA. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with SC-'236 alone, radiation
alone, or a combination of both, and tumor growth delay was measured.
The 10-day treatment with SC-'236 commenced when tumors were
6 mm in
diameter, and tumors were locally irradiated with a 25-Gy single dose
when 8 mm in diameter, which occurred 25 days later. Fig. 1B
shows that SC-'236 greatly increased radiation-induced
tumor growth delay. Growth delay after the combined treatment was more
than the sum of growth delays caused by either alone. Tumors grew from
8 to 12 mm tumors in 4.1 ± 0.5 days when treated with
vehicle, 5.5 ± 0.3 days when treated with SC-'236,
14.8 ± 1.0 days when treated with 25 Gy of local tumor
irradiation, and 28.4 ± 3.5 days when treated with both
agents (P = 0.03, compared with radiation
only group). The EF was 2.14. It was obtained by dividing the
normalized tumor growth delay of the combined groups (22.9 days) by the
absolute tumor growth delay of the radiation-only group (10.2 days).
A TCD50 study was performed to determine whether
SC-'236 augments tumor radiocurability. As in the tumor growth delay
experiment, a 10-day treatment with SC-'236 was started when tumors
were
6 mm in diameter, and local irradiation was given when tumors
were 8 mm in diameter. Single doses of irradiation ranged from 25 to 50
Gy in mice treated with vehicle and from 11 to 46 Gy in mice treated
with SC-'236. The radiation dose-response curves for tumor control at
120 days after irradiation are shown in Fig. 2
. SC-'236 greatly reduced the TCD50 value, from
39.2 Gy (95% confidence limits, 35.0, 43.9 Gy) to 20.9 Gy (95%
confidence limits, 16.8, 24.8 Gy). The EF was 1.87, and obtained by
dividing the TCD50 of the combined treatment
group with that of the radiation-alone group. Thus SC-'236 greatly
enhanced the radioresponse of the FSA tumor.

View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Radiation dose-response curves for local tumor control of
FSA tumors. Closed symbols, irradiation only;
open symbols, irradiation plus SC-'236 treatment.
Horizontal bars at TCD50 are 95% confidence
limits. Treatments with SC-'236 and local tumor irradiation are
described in the legend for Fig. 1B
.
|
|
Normal Tissue Response to Radiation.
To be therapeutically beneficial, any radiopotentiating agent must
increase tumor radioresponse more than the radioresponse of
dose-limiting normal tissues. Here, we assessed whether SC-'236 affects
the radioresponse of jejunal mucosa, an example for acute normal tissue
damage, and whether it modifies radiation-induced leg contracture, an
example of late radiation damage. In the experiment that assessed
jejunal damage, SC-'236 (6 mg/kg) was given in the drinking water for
6.5 consecutive days starting 3 days before the mice were exposed to a
single dose of WBI (range, 9.513.5 Gy). Fig. 3
shows the survival of crypt epithelial cells as a function of radiation
dose. Radiation caused a dose-dependent reduction in crypt cell
survival. Treatment with SC-'236 caused a small but significant
(P < 0.007) shift in the radiation survival
curve to lower doses, indicating an EF of 1.03. This small shift would
probably not be clinically detectable.

View larger version (17K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3. Radiation single-dose survival curves for jejunum crypt
cells in mice treated with SC-'236 ( ) or with vehicle ().
Intercepts of survival curves were significantly different at
P < 0.0007. Bars,
SE.
|
|
The effect of SC-'236 on radiation-induced leg contracture was
determined in the same mice that were used in the
TCD50 experiment with FSA (see Fig. 2
) and in the
experiment with NFSA tumor reported previously (23)
. Mice
with no recurrence in the irradiated leg were examined for leg
contracture 120 days after irradiation. The degree of leg contracture
increased with the increase in radiation dose, and SC-'236 treatment
had no effect on its severity (Fig. 4)
.
COX-2 Expression and PGE2 Production in FSA.
We previously reported that the FSA tumor produces a number of PGs, in
particular PGE2 (24)
, and that the
antitumor and radioenhancing effects of indomethacin were associated
with a reduction in PGE2 production
(20)
. The following experiments determined whether FSA
expresses COX-2 and whether the expression of COX-2 and
PGE2 production by this tumor are influenced by
SC-'236. The levels of COX-2 and PGE2 were
determined in tumors derived from mice after treatment with vehicle or
SC-'236 (6 mg/kg) for 3 consecutive days. Western blot analysis (Fig. 5A)
showed that FSA expressed COX-2 protein and that its
expression was not influenced by SC-'236 (Fig. 5B)
. In
contrast, SC-'236 reduced the level of PGE2 in
FSA tumors from the control value of 1411 ± 437 ng/g to
400 ± 112 ng/g (P = 0.03).

View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5. A, expression of COX-2 in FSA tumors
growing in vivo and FSA cells growing in
vitro (Western blot analysis). B, expression of
COX-2 in FSA tumors in vivo treated with SC-'236 or
vehicle over a period of 10 days. kD, kilodaltons;
TPA,
12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate.
|
|
Apoptotic Induction.
The possibility that SC-'236 enhanced tumor radioresponse by increasing
sensitivity of tumor cells to radiation-induced apoptosis was
considered. Tumors in mice treated with SC-'236 or vehicle for 3 days
were locally irradiated with 25 Gy and then analyzed for apoptosis 4,
8, or 24 h after irradiation. The controls were tumors treated
with SC-'236 or vehicle only. The percentage of apoptotic cells in the
control (vehicle) as well as in the treatment groups was <1% (results
not shown), which shows that induction of apoptosis was not a mechanism
by which SC-'236 enhanced FSA radioresponse.
Tumor Angiogenesis.
Because PGs stimulate angiogenesis, the possibility that SC-'236 slowed
tumor growth by inhibiting tumor angiogenesis was investigated. The
mice received intradermal injections of tumor cells, and the number of
vessels at the injection site was determined 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 days
later. In Fig. 6
is shown that neovascularization preceded measurable tumor growth and
that SC-'236 significantly reduced the number of newly formed vessels.
Whereas the vessel count in the control group was 38.4 ± 2.1 after 10 days, it reached only 25.7 ± 1.7
in the treatment group. This significant reduction
(P < 0.005) in neovascularization was
associated with significant tumor growth retardation, from
267.7 ± 25.8 mm3 in controls to
117.8 ± 9 mm3 after COX-2
inhibitor treatment (P < 0.005).
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
PGs are metabolites of polyunsaturated fatty acids synthesized by
COXs. They are produced by virtually all mammalian tissues in response
to physiological signals or cell injury, and they exert a wide range of
pharmacological, physiological, and pathological effects. PGs play a
regulatory role in many physiological processes, including
vasomotility, platelet aggregation, immunomodulation, and cell growth
and differentiation (33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39)
. They are implicated in the
pathogenesis of pathophysiological processes such as inflammation,
autoimmune diseases, and tumor development and growth (3
, 13
, 24
, 34
, 37
, 40)
.
In this study, we showed that SC-'236, a selective inhibitor of COX-2,
was highly effective in the treatment of the murine sarcoma FSA when
combined with radiotherapy. SC-'236 greatly enhanced tumor
radioresponse as evidenced by the increase in tumor growth delay, by a
factor of 2.14, and the augmentation of tumor curability, by a factor
of 1.87. These findings support our recent observations using the NFSA
sarcoma tumor, where SC-'236 enhanced tumor growth delay by a factor of
3.64 and tumor radiocurability by a factor of 1.77 (23)
.
This radiation-enhancing effect was greater than the effect we reported
previously for indomethacin, a NSAID that inhibits both COX-1 and COX-2
(20)
. In that study, indomethacin enhanced tumor
radiocurability of FSA and NFSA tumors by a factor of 1.39 and 1.26,
respectively (20)
.
SC-'236 was also investigated for its ability to influence normal
tissue radioresponse. The drug slightly sensitized the acutely
responding tissue (jejunum) by a factor of only 1.03 but did not affect
late-responding tissues (leg contracture). These observations imply
that specific inhibitors of COX-2 have great potential for increasing
the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy.
The present study also addressed a number of possible mechanisms that
could have been involved in SC-'236-induced potentiation of tumor
radioresponse. FSA expresses COX-2 (Fig. 5A)
and produces a
number of different PGs, notably PGE2
(24)
. Treatment of mice with SC-'236 did not affect COX-2
production but significantly inhibited PGE2
production. Thus, the antitumor effect of SC-'236 on its own and
SC-'236-induced enhancement of tumor radioresponse were associated with
a reduction in the production of PGs. In general, PGs are regarded as
radioprotective agents, both at the cellular and tissue
microenvironment levels (17)
, whose mechanisms are poorly
understood. For example, COX-1-derived PGs protect intestinal crypt
cells from radiation damage (17
, 18) . Therefore, it is
logical to assume that a decrease in PG levels in tumors may have
caused the loss of radioprotection
COX-2-derived PGs can stimulate tumor cell proliferation and inhibit
apoptosis, which can be reversed by treatment with selective COX-2
inhibitors (41)
. A possibility that SC-'236 enhanced FSA
radioresponse by rendering tumor cells susceptible to
radiation-induced apoptosis was tested. We reported previously that
cells of this tumor are resistant to induction of apoptosis by
radiation and chemotherapy (42
, 43)
. The present study
showed that SC-'236 was also not effective in inducing apoptosis of FSA
cells, nor did it increase susceptibility of FSA to radiation-induced
apoptosis.
PGs stimulate angiogenesis and are vasoactive agents; both activities
may influence tumor growth and response to cytotoxic agents. Treatment
with SC-'236 was effective in inhibiting FSA vascularization (Fig. 6)
,
which was associated with tumor growth retardation. A similar finding
was reported in studies using NFSA (23)
. In addition,
Masferrer et al. (44)
reported that celecoxib,
another selective inhibitor of COX-2, potently inhibited fibroblast
growth factor-induced corneal angiogenesis in rats. Overall, these data
show that specific COX-2 inhibitors are potent antiangiogenic agents.
It is not clear, however, whether the inhibition of angiogenesis played
a role in SC-'236-induced enhancement of tumor radioresponse. However,
the involvement of antiangiogenesis is highly possible, based on the
increasing recent evidence that the combination of radiation with
antiangiogenic compounds, such as angiostatin (45)
,
produces greater than an additive therapeutic effect.
Other mechanisms not explored in the present study could also have been
involved in SC-'236-induced enhancement of tumor radioresponse. For
example, PGs are immunosuppressive substances, and their inhibition
might result in the augmentation of antitumor immunological responses
that could potentiate tumor response to radiation. Although the
mechanisms for the observed enhancement of tumor radiosensitization
still remain to be explored in more detail, our findings and those
reported previously (23)
show that specific inhibitors of
COX-2 can enhance the tumor response to radiation. The enhancement was
achieved without an appreciable increase in the radiation damage of
normal tissues, both acutely and in late-responding tissues.
Therefore, SC-'236 was able to increase the therapeutic gain when
combined with radiotherapy in a preclinical tumor model, which suggests
that selective inhibition of COX-2 has a high potential to increase the
effectiveness of radiotherapy for cancer.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Lane Watkins and his staff for the supply and care of
the mice used in these studies. Animals used in this study were
maintained in facilities approved by the American Association for
Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and in accordance with current
regulations and standards of the United States Department of
Agriculture and Department of Health and Human Services.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Experimental Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas,
M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Box 066,
Houston, TX 77030-4095. Phone: (713) 792-3263; Fax: (713) 794-5369;
E-mail: lmilas{at}mdanderson.org 
2 The abbreviations used are: PG, prostaglandin;
COX, cyclooxygenase; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug;
TCD50, radiation dose yielding 50% local tumor control;
WBI, whole-body irradiation; EF, enhancement factor. 
Received 9/13/99.
Accepted 1/ 5/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Masferrer J. L., Isakson P. C., Seibert K. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors: a new class of anti-inflammatory agents that spare the gastrointestinal tract. Gastroenterol. Clin. N. Am., 25: 363-372, 1996.[Medline]
-
Pairet M., Engelhardt G. Distinct isoforms (COX-1 and COX-2) of cyclooxygenase: possible physiological and therapeutic implications. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol., 10: 1-17, 1996.[Medline]
-
Taketo M. M. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis (part II). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 1609-1620, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sheng H., Williams C. S., Shao J., Liang P., DuBois R. N., Beauchamp R. D. Induction of cyclooxygenase-2 by activated Ha-ras oncogene in Rat-1 fibroblasts and the role of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 22120-22127, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Subbaramaiah K., Altorki N., Chung W. J., Mestre J. R., Sampat A., Dannenberg A. J. Inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2 gene expression by p53. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 10911-10915, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tsujii M., Kawano S., DuBois R. N. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in human colon cancer cells increases metastatic potential. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 3336-3340, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Tucker O. N., Dannenberg A. J., Yang E. K., Zhang F., Teng L., Daly J. M., Soslow R. A., Masferrer J. L., Woerner B. M., Koki A. T., Fahey T. J., III. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is up-regulated in human pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res., 59: 987-990, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Uefuji K., Ichikura T., Mochizuki H., Shinomiya N. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein in gastric adenocarcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol., 69: 168-172, 1998.[Medline]
-
Sano H., Kawahito Y., Wilder R. L., Hashiramoto A., Mukai S., Asai K., Kimura S., Kato H., Kondo M., Hla T. Expression of cyclooxygenase-1 and -2 in human colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 55: 3785-3789, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Battu S., Rigaud M., Beneytout J. L. Resistance to apoptosis and cyclooxygenase-2 expression in a human adenocarcinoma cell line HT29 CL.19A. Anticancer Res., 18: 3579-3583, 1998.[Medline]
-
Chan G., Boyle J. O., Yang E. K., Zhang F., Sacks P. G., Shah J. P., Edelstein D., Soslow R. A., Koki A. T., Woerner B. M., Masferrer J. L., Dannenberg A. J. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression is up-regulated in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cancer Res., 59: 991-994, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Elder D. J., Halton D. E., Hague A., Paraskeva C. Induction of apoptotic cell death in human colorectal carcinoma cell lines by a cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)-selective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: independence from COX-2 protein expression. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 1679-1683, 1997.[Abstract]
-
Kalgutkar A. S., Crews B. C., Rowlinson S. W., Garner C., Seibert K., Marnett L. J. Aspirin-like molecules that covalently inactivate cyclooxygenase-2. Science (Washington DC), 280: 1268-1270, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Taketo M. M. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors in tumorigenesis (part I). J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 90: 1529-1536, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hawkey C. J. COX-2 inhibitors. Lancet, 353: 307-314, 1999.[Medline]
-
Pillsbury H. C., Webster W. P., Rosenman J. Prostaglandin inhibitor and radiotherapy in advanced head and neck cancers. Arch. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg., 112: 552-553, 1986.
-
Milas L., Hanson W. R. Eicosanoids and radiation. Eur. J. Cancer, 31A: 1580-1585, 1995.
-
Hanson W. R., Thomas C. 16,16-Dimethyl prostaglandin E2 increases survival of murine intestinal stem cells when given before photon radiation. Radiat. Res., 96: 393-398, 1983.[Medline]
-
Sochanowicz B., Szumiel I. Arachidonic acid metabolism in murine lymphoma cell sublines differing in radiation sensitivity. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids, 55: 241-247, 1996.[Medline]
-
Furuta Y., Hunter N., Barkley T., Jr., Hall E., Milas L. Increase in radioresponse of murine tumors by treatment with indomethacin. Cancer Res., 48: 3008-3013, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Milas L., Furuta Y., Hunter N., Nishiguchi I., Runkel S. Dependence of indomethacin-induced potentiation of murine tumor radioresponse on tumor host immunocompetence. Cancer Res., 50: 4473-4477, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Palayoor S. T., Bump E. A., Calderwood S. K., Bartol S., Coleman C. N. Combined antitumor effect of radiation and ibuprofen in human prostate carcinoma cells. Clin. Cancer Res., 4: 763-771, 1998.[Abstract]
-
Milas L., Kishi K., Hunter N., Mason K., Masferrer J. L., Tofilon P. J. Enhancement of tumor response to
-radiation by an inhibitor of cyclooxygenase-2 enzyme. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 1501-1504, 1999.[Free Full Text]
-
Furuta Y., Hall E. R., Sanduja S., Barkley T., Jr., Milas L. Prostaglandin production by murine tumors as a predictor for therapeutic response to indomethacin. Cancer Res., 48: 3002-3007, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Milas L., Hunter N., Mason K., Withers H. R. Immunological resistance to pulmonary metastases in C3Hf-Bu mice bearing syngeneic fibrosarcoma of different sizes. Cancer Res., 34: 61-71, 1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Withers H. R., Elkind M. M. Radiosensitivity and fractionation response of crypt cells of mouse jejunum. Radiat. Res., 38: 598-613, 1969.[Medline]
-
Stone H. B. Leg contracture in mice: an assay of normal tissue response. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys., 10: 1053-1061, 1984.[Medline]
-
Kujubu D. A., Herschman H. R. Dexamethasone inhibits mitogen induction of the TIS10 prostaglandin synthase/cyclooxygenase gene. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 7991-7994, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Salvemini D., Masferrer J. L. Interactions of nitric oxide with cyclooxygenase: in vitro, ex vivo, and in vivo studies. Methods Enzymol., 269: 12-25, 1996.[Medline]
-
Stephens L. C., Ang K. K., Schultheiss T. E., Milas L., Meyn R. E. Apoptosis in irradiated murine tumors. Radiat. Res., 127: 308-316, 1991.[Medline]
-
Milas L., Hunter N. R., Kurdoglu B., Mason K. A., Meyn R. E., Stephens L. C., Peters L. J. Kinetics of mitotic arrest and apoptosis in murine mammary and ovarian tumors treated with taxol. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 35: 297-303, 1995.[Medline]
-
Runkel S., Hunter N., Milas L. An intradermal assay for quantification and kinetics studies of tumor angiogenesis in mice. Radiat. Res., 126: 237-243, 1991.[Medline]
-
Leung K. H., Mihich E. Prostaglandin modulation of development of cell-mediated immunity in culture. Nature (Lond.), 288: 597-600, 1980.[Medline]
-
Brunda M. J., Herberman R. B., Holden H. T. Inhibition of murine natural killer cell activity by prostaglandins. J. Immunol., 124: 2682-2687, 1980.[Medline]
-
Moskowitz M. A., Coughlin S. R. Clinical applications of prostaglandins and their inhibitors. Stroke, 12: 882-886, 1981.[Free Full Text]
-
Ziche M., Jones J., Gullino P. M. Role of prostaglandin E1 and copper in angiogenesis. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 69: 475-482, 1982.
-
Dubois R. N., Abramson S. B., Crofford L., Gupta R. A., Simon L. S., Van De Putte L. B., Lipsky P. E. Cyclooxygenase in biology and disease [see comments]. FASEB J., 12: 1063-1073, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Chiarugi V., Magnelli L., Gallo O. Cox-2, iNOS and p53 as play-makers of tumor angiogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Med., 2: 715-719, 1998.[Medline]
-
Hejna M., Raderer M., Zielinski C. C. Inhibition of metastases by anticoagulants. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 22-36, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Honn K. V., Bockman R. S., Marnett L. J. Prostaglandins and cancer: a review of tumor initiation through tumor metastasis. Prostaglandins, 21: 833-864, 1981.[Medline]
-
Sheng H., Shao J., Kirkland S. C., Isakson P., Coffey R. J., Morrow J., Beauchamp R. D., DuBois R. N. Inhibition of human colon cancer cell growth by selective inhibition of cyclooxygenase-2. J. Clin. Investig., 99: 2254-2259, 1997.[Medline]
-
Meyn R. E., Stephens L. C., Ang K. K., Hunter N. R., Brock W. A., Milas L., Peters L. J. Heterogeneity in the development of apoptosis in irradiated murine tumours of different histologies. Int. J. Radiat. Biol., 64: 583-591, 1993.[Medline]
-
Schimming R., Mason K. A., Hunter N., Weil M., Kishi K., Milas L. Lack of correlation between mitotic arrest or apoptosis and antitumor effect of docetaxel. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol., 43: 165-172, 1999.[Medline]
-
Masferrer J. L., Leahy J. M., Lei Y., Moore R., Flickinger A., Zweifel B., Koki A. T., Seibert K. Celecoxib: a specific COX-2 inhibitor with anti-angiogenetic and anti-cancer activities. Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res., 40: 396 1999.
-
Gorski D. H., Mauceri H. J., Salloum R. M., Gately S., Hellman S., Beckett M. A., Sukhatme V. P., Soff G. A., Kufe D. W., Weichselbaum R. R. Potentiation of the antitumor effect of ionizing radiation by brief concomitant exposures to angiostatin. Cancer Res., 58: 5686-5689, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
M.-R. Pan, H.-C. Chang, L.-Y. Chuang, and W.-C. Hung
The Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug NS398 Reactivates SPARC Expression via Promoter Demethylation to Attenuate Invasiveness of Lung Cancer Cells
Experimental Biology and Medicine,
April 1, 2008;
233(4):
456 - 462.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. B. Kunnumakkara, P. Diagaradjane, S. Guha, A. Deorukhkar, S. Shentu, B. B. Aggarwal, and S. Krishnan
Curcumin Sensitizes Human Colorectal Cancer Xenografts in Nude Mice to {gamma}-Radiation by Targeting Nuclear Factor-{kappa}B-Regulated Gene Products
Clin. Cancer Res.,
April 1, 2008;
14(7):
2128 - 2136.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Horrillo, A. Planaguma, A. Gonzalez-Periz, N. Ferre, E. Titos, R. Miquel, M. Lopez-Parra, J. L. Masferrer, V. Arroyo, and J. Claria
Comparative Protection against Liver Inflammation and Fibrosis by a Selective Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitor and a Nonredox-Type 5-Lipoxygenase Inhibitor
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,
December 1, 2007;
323(3):
778 - 786.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Guruvayoorappan and G. Kuttan
{beta}-Carotene Inhibits Tumor-Specific Angiogenesis by Altering the Cytokine Profile and Inhibits the Nuclear Translocation of Transcription Factors in B16F-10 Melanoma Cells
Integr Cancer Ther,
September 1, 2007;
6(3):
258 - 270.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Xu and H.-K. G. Shu
EGFR Activation Results in Enhanced Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression through p38 Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase-Dependent Activation of the Sp1/Sp3 Transcription Factors in Human Gliomas
Cancer Res.,
July 1, 2007;
67(13):
6121 - 6129.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. de Heer, M. J.E.M. Gosens, E. C. de Bruin, N. G. Dekker-Ensink, H. Putter, C. A.M. Marijnen, A. J.C. van den Brule, J. H. J.M. van Krieken, H. J.T. Rutten, P. J.K. Kuppen, et al.
Cyclooxygenase 2 Expression in Rectal Cancer Is of Prognostic Significance in Patients Receiving Preoperative Radiotherapy
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 15, 2007;
13(10):
2955 - 2960.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. A. Davies, B. Knight, Y. W. Tian, G. C.T. Yeoh, and J. K. Olynyk
Hepatic oval cell response to the choline-deficient, ethionine supplemented model of murine liver injury is attenuated by the administration of a cyclo-oxygenase 2 inhibitor
Carcinogenesis,
August 1, 2006;
27(8):
1607 - 1616.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. K. Khan, F. Mamou, M. J. Schipper, K. S. May, A. Kwitny, A. Warnat, B. Bolton, B. M. Nair, M. S. T. Kariapper, M. Miller, et al.
Combination tetrathiomolybdate and radiation therapy in a mouse model of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg,
March 1, 2006;
132(3):
333 - 338.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Xi, S. E. Baldus, U. Warnecke-Eberz, J. Brabender, S. Neiss, R. Metzger, F. C. Ling, H. P. Dienes, E. Bollschweiler, S. Moenig, et al.
High Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Following Neoadjuvant Radiochemotherapy Is Associated with Minor Histopathologic Response and Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
December 1, 2005;
11(23):
8341 - 8347.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. K. Shin, J. S. Park, H. S. Kim, H. J. Jun, G. E. Kim, C. O. Suh, Y. S. Yun, and H. Pyo
Radiosensitivity Enhancement by Celecoxib, a Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 Selective Inhibitor, via COX-2-Dependent Cell Cycle Regulation on Human Cancer Cells Expressing Differential COX-2 Levels
Cancer Res.,
October 15, 2005;
65(20):
9501 - 9509.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. T. Palayoor, M. J. Arayankalayil, A. Shoaibi, and C. N. Coleman
Radiation Sensitivity of Human Carcinoma Cells Transfected with Small Interfering RNA Targeted against Cyclooxygenase-2
Clin. Cancer Res.,
October 1, 2005;
11(19):
6980 - 6986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. H. Kim, V. Bossuyt, T. Ponn, D. Lannin, and B. G. Haffty
Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Postmastectomy Chest Wall Relapse
Clin. Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2005;
11(14):
5199 - 5205.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Z. Liao, R. Komaki, L. Milas, C. Yuan, M. Kies, J. Y. Chang, M. Jeter, T. Guerrero, G. Blumenschien, C. M. Smith, et al.
A Phase I Clinical Trial of Thoracic Radiotherapy and Concurrent Celecoxib for Patients with Unfavorable Performance Status Inoperable/Unresectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res.,
May 1, 2005;
11(9):
3342 - 3348.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Uchida, S. Schneider, J. M. Yochim, H. Kuramochi, K. Hayashi, K. Takasaki, D. Yang, K. D. Danenberg, and P. V. Danenberg
Intratumoral COX-2 Gene Expression Is a Predictive Factor for Colorectal Cancer Response to Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemothe |