| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-2390 [D. R. W., T. S., T. O. L., S. F. G., D. J. H.]; Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, Massachusetts [R. P., J. V. B., A. A.]; Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts [Q. H., R. L. E.]; and Instituto Venezolano Investigaciones Cientificas, Caracas, Venezuela [M. R., M. S. R.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression of constitutively active MEK1 in NIH3T3 fibroblasts results in cellular transformation (3) . Activation of MEK1 is accomplished by phosphorylation of serines at positions 218 (S218) and 222 (S222; Ref. 3 ). To create constitutively active MEK1, S218 and S222 were mutated to aspartic acid, mimicking the phosphorylated/active state. The MEK1-activated mutants were designated DS and DD, where DS is Asp218/Ser222 and DD is Asp218/Asp222. DS and DD clonal cell lines produced colonies when grown in soft agar, an in vitro indicator of transformation. However, anchorage-independent growth did not correlate with ERK1/2 activity. The DS (DS2 and DS4) lines exhibited constitutively active ERK1/2, yet yielded fewer colonies compared with DD lines (DD1 and DD3), which had basal ERK1/2 activity. These data suggested that maintenance of transformation was independent of ERK1/2 activity.
Recently, Webb et al. (4) , using various ras mutants, showed that although tumorigenicity was independent of ERK1/2 activity, metastasis required its activation. Therefore, we wanted to determine whether clonal cell lines that we established previously and that exhibited constitutive or basal levels of ERK1/2 activity could also confer tumorigenicity and/or metastatic potential. Our data show that tumorigenic and metastatic potentials are dependent upon MEK1 activation but appear to be independent of ERK1/2 activity.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Western Blot.
Lungs were isolated 2741 days after i.v. inoculation from NIH3T3-,
DS- and DD-injected athymic mice. The tissue was analyzed by Western
blotting as described (3)
with some modifications.
Briefly, lungs were lysed by Dounce homogenization in potassium
phosphate buffer [10 mM KPO4 (pH
7.05), 1 mM EDTA, 5 mM EGTA, 10 mM
MgCl2, 50 mM ß-glycerophosphate, 1
mM sodium vanadate, 1 mM DTT, 0.5% NP40, 0.1%
Brij-3, 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 10 µg/ml
leupeptin, and 10 µg/ml pepstatin A]. Lung metastases were dissected
from adjacent normal tissues before further processing. Lysates were
centrifuged at 16,000 x g for 10 min.
Supernatants (40 µg) were boiled in 1x sample buffer [500
mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 10% SDS, 20% glycerol,
0.05% bromphenol blue, and 1% 2-mercaptoethanol] for 5 min and
electrophoresed on a 10% SDS polyacrylamide gel. Proteins were then
transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride Immobilon membrane (Millipore,
MA) and probed with phosphospecific ERK1/2 antibody (New England
Biolabs, Beverly, MA) at a dilution of 1:1000 at 4°C overnight
in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 and 3% BSA. Membranes were then
incubated with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antirabbit antibody
(Amersham) at a dilution of 1:2000 at room temperature for 20 min, and
the signal was detected using electrochemiluminescence (ECL; Amersham),
followed by exposure to X-OMAT AR film (Eastman Kodak, Rochester, NY).
Blots were stripped and reblotted with anti-ERK1/2 antibody (C-14;
Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Biotechnology, CA) to determine equal loading
of samples. Stripping was accomplished by submerging the membrane in
100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, 20% SDS, and 62.5
mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.7) for 30 min at 55°C,
followed by washing two times in PBS/0.1% Tween 20 for 10 min.
Growth in Soft Agar and on Bacterial Petri Plates.
Cells (1 x 105) were plated onto
60-mm bacterial Petri plates (Fisher Scientific, Pittsburgh, PA) or
tissue culture plates (Corning, Oneata, NY) and examined daily for
growth and proliferation by counting total cell number using a
hemacytometer. The methods used for assessing growth on bacterial
plates were identical to those of Rieber et al.
(6)
. Growth in soft agar was done as described (7
, 8)
using 0.25% agar.
Gelatin Enzymography.
Enzymography was done by seeding cells (1.5 x 106/well) in a 12-well plate, followed by
incubation at 37°C for 2448 h. The complete medium was then removed
and replaced with serum-free medium, and the cells were incubated at
37°C for 24 h. The next day, the supernatant was removed and
spun at 1500 rpm for 10 min. Samples were solubilized in
electrophoresis sample buffer containing SDS, absent of
ß-mercaptoethanol. Samples, normalized to volume and cell number,
were loaded onto a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel containing 1 mg/ml gelatin. After
the gel was run, it was transferred to Triton X-100 and incubated for
1 h at room temperature. It was then incubated in reaction buffer
for 24 h at 37°C. The gel was stained with Coomassie Blue and
destained, and the MMP2 and MMP9 bands were visualized.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
DS variant clones exhibited constitutively active ERK1/2 activity whereas the DD clones have basal levels, yet both were equally tumorigenic. This result implies that tumorigenicity is independent of ERK activity. This conclusion is also suggested by Webb et al. (4) , who used ras transformants.
DD and DS Variants Are Metastatic.
Each of the clonal cell lines expressing constitutively active MEK1
formed metastases after i.v. injection into the tail veins of athymic
mice. Table 1
shows data from two independent experiments in which the MEK1 clonal
lines aggressively colonized mouse lungs. These results corroborated
and extended previous studies that showed that activated ras
could confer tumorigenic and metastatic potentials upon NIH3T3 cells
(2)
. Indeed, it showed that at least some portion of these
phenotypes were mediated through the MAP kinase pathway downstream of
MEK1.
|
|
DS and DD Clones Show Increased MMP2 and MMP9 Activity.
Using gelatin enzymography, we demonstrated that the MEK1-transformed
clonal lines also show an increase in the levels of MMP2 and MMP9 (Fig. 3B)
, two MMPs that have been implicated in metastasis
(9)
. SDS-PAGE of cell culture supernatants from DS and DD
variants also revealed increased levels of a
Mr
39,000 protein. Isolation and
sequencing of this protein revealed that it was cathepsin
L.4
Therefore, it is possible that MEK1 transformation leads to the
production of proteinases, such as MMP2, MMP9, and cathepsin L, that
contribute to metastatic potential.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Previous studies have demonstrated that introduction of oncogenic forms of the ras oncogene confer both tumorigenic and metastatic potentials upon NIH3T3 cells. These results implicated events downstream in the regulation of metastasis. The current study was to begin identifying key downstream components contributing to tumorigenicity and metastasis. Toward that end, constitutively active variants of MEK1, a downstream component of the ras/MAPK pathway that has been shown previously to lead to cellular transformation, were used. Like ras, MEK1 transformants of NIH3T3 are not only tumorigenic but are also metastatic. Thus, our results refine the mechanism through which ras can confer these phenotypes and imply that the critical determinants are downstream of MEK1.
Recently, Webb et al. (4) used ras transfectants to show that tumorigenicity occurred through both Raf-dependent and -independent pathways. In contrast, metastatic potential in their model correlated with variants that were able to activate ERK1 activity. Seven to 9 weeks after injection into mice, some of the ras transfectants (that were originally nonmetastatic) formed lung colonies. This implies that some selection may have occurred, and the authors suggest that increased expression of the Met receptor tyrosine kinase is responsible, although only modest increases in ERK1/2 activity was observed in these variants. Hepatocyte growth factor, the ligand of the Met receptor, can induce both the MEK1 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathways, leaving the possibility that the pathway responsible for acquisition of metastasis in these cells is MEK1 and/or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase dependent.
Although we are in agreement with Webb et al. (4) concerning tumorigenicity and how the process may be ERK1/2 independent, we have contrasting results regarding metastatic potential and ERK1/2 activity. This discrepancy may be attributable to the fact that we specifically analyzed MEK1 transformants and not ras transformants. It is also possible that MEK1-induced transformation may occur through a pathway that is distinct from that of ras transformation and may not necessarily require ERK1/2 activity to maintain transformation.
The current results are consistent with those in which we showed previously that growth in soft agar is independent of ERK activity. DS and DD have varying ERK activity, and we wanted to know whether, in fact, metastasis was dependent upon the level of ERK activity. Western blot data of the lung metastases show that, in fact, metastatic potential is independent of ERK activity, suggesting that the signaling pathway diverges downstream of MEK1, activating as yet undefined components. Although the downstream components have yet to be identified, we do know that these clonal cell lines express and secrete the proteinases MMP2, MMP9, and cathepsin L.
Expression of MMPs has been correlated with metastatic potential as well as ERK, c-Jun NH2 kinase, and p38 kinase pathways (11) , although it was shown previously that stimulation of the MMP9 promoter by ras is independent of MEK1, requiring multiple transcription factor binding sites. Recently, McCawley et al. (12) have shown that sustained activation of ERK led to increased MMP-9 activity and cell migration in keratinocytes.
Likewise, increased expression of cathepsin L has been correlated with metastatic potential in ras-transfected cell lines (13) . As for the MMPs, higher expression and activity of cathepsin L could lead to higher efficiency penetration of physiological barriers or increased cathepsin L can be involved in tumor cell evasion of immune response by cleavage of the third component of complement (14) .
In conclusion, the results presented here refine one pathway involved in the regulation of metastasis by demonstrating that mediators downstream of MEK1 are involved. Moreover, the results imply that ERK1/2 activity are not essential for the development and/or maintenance of metastatic foci.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by Grants CA62168 (to
D. R. W.), NS10828 (to A. A. and J. V. B.), DK39773 (to
J. V. B.) from the NIH; the United States Army Medical Research and
Materiel Command DAMD17-96-1-6152 (to D. R. W.); the National
Foundation for Cancer Research (to D. R. W.); The American Heart
AssociationMassachusetts Division; and CONICIT grants S1-96001340 and
G-9700613 (to M. R. and M. S. R.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, D. R. W. at Jake Gittlen Cancer Research Institute, Room
C7810, Box H-059, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine,
500 University Drive, Hershey, PA 17033-2390 or A. A. at Renal Unit,
Massachusetts General Hospital-East, 149 13th Street, Charlestown, MA
02129. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: MAP,
mitogen-activated protein; ERK, extracellular signal-regulated kinase;
MEK, MAP kinase/ERK kinase; DS, MEK1-DS; DD, MEK1-DD; MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase. ![]()
4 Q. Hon, A. Alessandrini, and R. Erikson,
unpublished data. ![]()
Received 12/13/99. Accepted 2/ 2/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. E. Discher, P. Janmey, and Y.-l. Wang Tissue Cells Feel and Respond to the Stiffness of Their Substrate Science, November 18, 2005; 310(5751): 1139 - 1143. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Gavert, M. Conacci-Sorrell, D. Gast, A. Schneider, P. Altevogt, T. Brabletz, and A. Ben-Ze'ev L1, a novel target of {beta}-catenin signaling, transforms cells and is expressed at the invasive front of colon cancers J. Cell Biol., February 14, 2005; 168(4): 633 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pinkas, S. S. Martin, and P. Leder Bcl-2-Mediated Cell Survival Promotes Metastasis of EpH4 {beta}MEKDD Mammary Epithelial Cells Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2004; 2(10): 551 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Schuierer, F. Bataille, S. Hagan, W. Kolch, and A.-K. Bosserhoff Reduction in Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Expression Is Associated with Increased Ras-Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Signaling in Melanoma Cell Lines Cancer Res., August 1, 2004; 64(15): 5186 - 5192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Silletti, M. Yebra, B. Perez, V. Cirulli, M. McMahon, and A. M. P. Montgomery Extracellular Signal-regulated Kinase (ERK)-dependent Gene Expression Contributes to L1 Cell Adhesion Molecule-dependent Motility and Invasion J. Biol. Chem., July 9, 2004; 279(28): 28880 - 28888. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Bedogni, M. S. O'Neill, S. M. Welford, D. M. Bouley, A. J. Giaccia, N. C. Denko, and M. B. Powell Topical Treatment with Inhibitors of the Phosphatidylinositol 3'-Kinase/Akt and Raf/Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinase/Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinase Pathways Reduces Melanoma Development in Severe Combined Immunodeficient Mice Cancer Res., April 1, 2004; 64(7): 2552 - 2560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Takino, H. Miyamori, Y. Watanabe, K. Yoshioka, M. Seiki, and H. Sato Membrane Type 1 Matrix Metalloproteinase Regulates Collagen-Dependent Mitogen-Activated Protein/Extracellular Signal-Related Kinase Activation and Cell Migration Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 64(3): 1044 - 1049. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Vander Griend and C. W. Rinker-Schaeffer A New Look at an Old Problem: The Survival and Organ-Specific Growth of Metastases Sci. Signal., January 20, 2004; 2004(216): pe3 - pe3. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-C. Hung, T. Ichimura, J. L. Stevens, and J. V. Bonventre Protection of Renal Epithelial Cells against Oxidative Injury by Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Preconditioning Is Mediated by ERK1/2 Activation J. Biol. Chem., August 1, 2003; 278(31): 29317 - 29326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. R. Welch and K. W. Hunter A New Member of the Growing Family of Metastasis Suppressors Identified in Prostate Cancer J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2003; 95(12): 839 - 841. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Fu, P. C. Smith, L. Zhang, M. A. Rubin, R. L. Dunn, Z. Yao, and E. T. Keller Effects of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Expression on Suppression of Prostate Cancer Metastasis J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2003; 95(12): 878 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Pinkas and P. Leder MEK1 Signaling Mediates Transformation and Metastasis of EpH4 Mammary Epithelial Cells Independent of an Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition Cancer Res., August 15, 2002; 62(16): 4781 - 4790. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. K. Greenberg, S. Basu, J. Hu, T.-a. Yie, K. M. Tchou-Wong, W. N. Rom, and T. C. Lee Selective p38 Activation in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol., May 1, 2002; 26(5): 558 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Mahloogi, D. E. Bassi, and A. J.P. Klein-Szanto Malignant conversion of non-tumorigenic murine skin keratinocytes overexpressing PACE4 Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2002; 23(4): 565 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Wang and A. Richmond Nuclear Factor-kappa B Activation by the CXC Chemokine Melanoma Growth-stimulatory Activity/Growth-regulated Protein Involves the MEKK1/p38 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Pathway J. Biol. Chem., January 26, 2001; 276(5): 3650 - 3659. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. P. Barry, B. Mullan, D. Sheehan, M. G. Kazanietz, F. Shanahan, J. K. Collins, and G. C. O'Sullivan Constitutive ERK1/2 Activation in Esophagogastric Rib Bone Marrow Micrometastatic Cells Is MEK-independent J. Biol. Chem., April 27, 2001; 276(18): 15537 - 15546. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |