
[Cancer Research 60, 1736-1741, March 15, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Molecular Biology and Genetics |
TSG101 Protein Steady-State Level Is Regulated Posttranslationally by an Evolutionarily Conserved COOH-Terminal Sequence1
Guo Hong Feng2,
Chih-Jian Lih and
Stanley N. Cohen3
Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Antisense inactivation of the tsg101 tumor susceptibility
gene in murine NIH3T3 fibroblasts leads to neoplastic
transformation and tumorigenesis, which are reversed by restoration of
tsg101 activity. tsg101 deficiency is associated with a
series of mitosis-related abnormalities, whereas overexpression of
TSG101 can also result in neoplastic transformation and the
perturbation of cell cycling. Together, these observations imply that
TSG101 production outside of a narrow range can lead to abnormal cell
growth. We report here that the TSG101 protein is maintained at an
almost constant steady-state level in cultured murine and human cells
and that this occurs through a posttranslational process involving
TSG101 protein degradation. Sustained overproduction of TSG101 from
chromosomally inserted adventitious constructs resulted in compensatory
down-regulation of endogenous TSG101 and replacement of the native
protein by the adventitious one. Using deletion mutants of TSG101, we
mapped the region responsible for autoregulation of the TSG101
steady-state level to an evolutionarily conserved sequence, here termed
the "steadiness box," located near TSG101s COOH-terminal end. Our
results suggest a model in which the biological effects of TSG101 are
modulated either by self-promoted proteolysis or participation with
other cellular protein(s) in a proteolytic feedback-control loop.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Functional inactivation of the tsg101 tumor
susceptibility gene by antisense RNA in murine NIH3T3 fibroblasts leads
to colony formation in 0.5% agar, focus formation in monolayer
cultures, and the ability to form metastatic tumors in athymic nude
mice (1)
. Restoration of tsg101 activity
reverses these features of neoplastic transformation as well as the
nuclear, microtubule, and mitotic spindle abnormalities observed in
TSG101-deficient cells (1
, 2)
. Initial PCR-based findings
of frequent intragenic DNA deletions within TSG101 in human
breast cancers (3)
have not been reproducible
(4)
, and Southern blotting has shown either no evidence of
TSG101 genomic mutations in breast tumors
(5, 6, 7)
or have shown genomic alterations occurring at low
frequency (8)
. Truncated TSG101 transcripts produced by
alternative splicing (9)
occur commonly in a variety of
human cancers (e.g., Refs. 3
, 6
, 7
, and 10, 11, 12, 13
), but also
have been observed in nonneoplastic tissues. The mechanism of action of
TSG101 is not known, although the gene has been proposed to
have a role in the regulation of ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis
(14
, 15) and the modulation of nuclear receptor-mediated
transcription activation (16, 17, 18)
.
Murine TSG101 is expressed from the one- or two-cell stage of embryonic
development (9)
and is expressed ubiquitously in the
organs of adult mice and humans (3
, 9)
. Either
overexpression or deficiency of TSG101 can result in tumorigenesis
(1)
or defective cell cycling (2
, 19)
,
implying that either elevation or diminution of the TSG101 steady-state
level can lead directly or indirectly to abnormal cell growth. A
corollary of this statement is that TSG101 expression normally may be
stringently controlled. We report here investigations that address the
mechanism of regulation of TSG101 protein level. We show that
intracellular TSG101 protein is in fact maintained within a narrow
range in cultured cell populations by a posttranslational mechanism
that modulates TSG101 protein degradation and prevents its accumulation
in cells overexpressing TSG101 mRNA. We further show that regulation of
the steady-state level of intracellular TSG101 protein is mediated by
an evolutionarily conserved sequence (termed the
SB4
) located near its COOH terminus.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Cell Culture and Transfection.
Human Ecr293 and mouse Ecr3T3 cell lines (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA),
which were used to study inducible expression of TSG101, can
express adventitious genes under control of a modified promoter
containing Drosophila ecdysone-responsive DNA elements.
These cell lines and their derivatives were grown in DMEM supplemented
with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg,
MD) and appropriate antibiotics. LipofectAMINE (Life Technologies,
Inc.) was used to transfect linearized DNA constructs into the cells
according to procedures recommended by the manufacturer. Stable
transfectants were selected and expanded in media containing G418 at
600800 µg/ml. To induce expression of the adventitious proteins,
cells at 4050% confluence were treated with analogues of the steroid
hormones ecdysone, MA at 1 µM, or PA at 5
µM dissolved, which gave equivalent induction, for 24 hr,
unless otherwise specified. Control cells were treated with the same
amount of solvent (µl of 95% ethanol/10 ml culture media) lacking
inducer.
DNA Subcloning and Manipulation.
The full-length protein coding sequence of mouse tsg101 cDNA
is 10 AA residues longer at the NH2 terminus than reported
initially (1)
, as recently verified and corrected by us
(GenBank accession numbers U52945 and U82130) and others
(9)
, and the corrected sequence was used in the
experiments reported here. Murine tsg101 cDNA was excised by
partial digestion with HindIII and digestion with
NotI from pLLEXP1 (1)
and inserted into
pIND (Invitrogen) that had been digested with HindIII and
NotI. The tsg101 coding sequence plus the 5'- and
3'-UTRs of the previously cloned cDNA are present in the resulting pIND
construct. Full-length human TSG101 cDNA (3)
was cleaved from pAMP1 by EagI and SalI and
inserted into pIND digested with NotI and XhoI.
Flag-tagged TSG101 constructs were made by fusing the 8-AA
Flag coding sequence (GACTACAAGGACGACGATGACAAG for AAs DYKDDDDK) in
frame with the last codon of the TSG101 protein coding
sequence through a spacer of three glycine codons (GGAGGTGGA). In-frame
short deletions in mouse TSG101 were generated by
linearization of the plasmid at an internal restriction enzyme cleavage
site, followed by treatment with S1 nuclease to delete several bases at
each end. Blunt ends were created using the Klenow fragment of
Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, and E. coli
DNA ligase was used to recircularize the construct before
transformation. LacZ fusion constructs were generated by
joining the last codon of the E. coli LacZ gene in plasmids
pIND-LacZ and pIND(SP1)-LacZ to a TSG101 cDNA fragment
coding for the COOH-terminal polypeptide through a DNA linker (GGGATC
for AAs G and I). DNA sequencing was always performed to identify the
appropriate in-frame fusion and to verify the correctness of junctions,
manipulated DNA segments, and PCR-derived sequences.
Antibodies.
Antisera against the full-length murine TSG101 protein or the
COOH-terminal 20 AAs were raised in rabbits, and the antibodies were
purified by affinity chromatography as described previously
(2)
. Other antibodies used in this research included the
M2 mouse monoclonal antibody (Kodak, New Haven, CT) for detection of
the Flag peptide and the antibody against
-tubulin (Sigma, St.
Louis, MO) for normalization of loading.
Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting.
Proteins in cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, electrotransferred
to nitrocellulose filters, and analyzed by enhanced chemiluminescence
(Amersham, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom).
Protein Labeling and Immunoprecipitation.
Cells grown to about 50% confluence were washed and incubated for
1 h in methionine-free DMEM (Life Technologies, Inc.), followed by
labeling of proteins in 150 µCi/ml [35S]methionine for
the designated time. In pulse-chase experiments, the labeling time was
1 h. For immunoprecipitations, labeled cells were washed in PBS
twice before being lysed in 2 ml of cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay
buffer [50 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 0.15 M NaCl,
1% Triton X-100, 0.5% deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and proteinase
inhibitors]. The lysates were centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 5 min, and
supernatants were either stored at -80°C or used directly.
Individual samples containing equal volumes of labeled extracts were
incubated for 1 h with 2 µg of nonspecific rabbit IgG and 30
µl of protein A-agarose beads (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) on a
rocking rotary shaker in a cold room. The supernatant was then
incubated with an excess amount of specific antibody and 30 µl of
protein A-agarose beads overnight. The beads were washed four times
with radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer, and bound proteins were
dissolved by boiling in the loading buffer, separated on SDS-PAGE gels,
and analyzed by autoradiography. Protein concentrations were estimated
by serial dilution of the protein samples before loading onto gels and
by spectroscopic analysis of band intensities on X-ray films.
Northern Blot Analysis.
Total RNAs were isolated from cells by RNA STAT-60 (Tel-Test,
Friendswood, TX), separated in agarose gels under denaturing
conditions, and transferred using capillaries to Hybond-N nylon
membranes (Amersham Life Sciences). Hybridization and washing were
performed under stringent conditions as described by Sambrook et
al. (20)
.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Overexpression of Adventitious TSG101 Protein Leads to a Decrease
in Endogenous TSG101.
In experiments initially aimed at overproducing TSG101
protein, we placed mouse and human TSG101 cDNAs containing
the full-length coding sequence under the control of a promoter
inducible by MA or PA and introduced these constructs by transfection
into human Ecr293 cells to generate stable cell lines. However, after
induction, we observed little or no increase in total TSG101 protein
from either construct by Western blot analysis of whole cell extracts
using antibody to full-length TSG101 as probe (Fig. 1A)
. To determine whether TSG101 protein actually was being expressed from
adventitious constructs and to distinguish induced TSG101 from the
endogenous protein, we attached a nucleotide segment encoding an 8-AA
Flag sequence plus three additional spacer AAs (see "Materials and
Methods") to the 3' ends of human and murine TSG101 protein coding
sequences and generated Ecr293 (human) and Ecr3T3 (murine) stable
transfectants containing these constructs. After the addition of MA to
these cultures, Western blot analysis of cell extracts using antibodies
made against either full-length TSG101 or its COOH-terminal end
detected human and murine cDNA-encoded protein bands that migrated more
slowly in gels (calculated molecular weights of 49,000 and
50,000, respectively, in both murine and human cells) than the
respective endogenous TSG101 proteins, which migrate near
Mr 46,000 (Fig. 1, BD).
Whereas the
positions of these bands were higher than expected from addition of the
11-AA Flag peptide and spacer to full-length TSG101 proteins,
immunoprecipitations from Ecr293 cells by antibody against the Flag
peptide (Fig. 1E
, right) confirmed that the
slowly migrating species made in these cells is Flag-tagged TSG101
protein derived from the induced adventitious construct (Fig. 1E
, left) rather than a modified form of
endogenous TSG101.

View larger version (39K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. Induced adventitious TSG101 protein down-regulates the
endogenous protein. Mouse and human full-length cDNAs containing or
lacking the Flag tag were inserted downstream of an inducible promoter
and transfected into human Ecr293 or mouse Ecr3T3 cells. Stable
transfectant cell lines were generated and tested for induced
expression of the adventitious TSG101 proteins. For each cell line,
equal amounts of total cellular proteins from MA-induced (1
µM) and noninduced cells were analyzed by immunoblotting
using antibodies against the full-length TSG101 protein. A,
Western blot showing intracellular levels of combined nontagged mouse
(adventitious) and human (endogenous) TSG101 proteins in five
representative cell lines. B and C, induced
expression of Flag-tagged mouse and human TSG101 proteins in human
Ecr293 cells, respectively. Induced and noninduced conditions were
compared for two representative cell lines for each construct. In
addition to the endogenous human protein (hTSG101), a new
band was detected under induction; Flag-mTSG101 or Flag-hTSG101
indicates the adventitious Flag-tagged mouse or human TSG101 protein.
D, induced expression of Flag-tagged mouse TSG101 protein
(Flag-mTSG101) in mouse Ecr3T3 cells. The endogenous mouse
TSG101 protein is marked as mTSG101. E, Western blot
detection of the adventitious protein by antibody against TSG101
protein (left); protein immunoprecipitated by antibody
against the Flag (right).
|
|
Additional Western blot analysis of Flag-tagged TSG101 in gels showed
that MA-induced expression of adventitious TSG101 protein resulted in
concomitant down-regulation of the resident protein, leading to
replacement of endogenous TSG101 by the adventitious protein in both
human Ecr293 cells and mouse Ecr3T3 cells (Fig. 2)
. Because similar results were observed in these cell lines during
expression of adventitious mouse and human TSG101 cDNAs, the
cDNAs and cell lines were used interchangeably in subsequent
experiments. As seen in Fig. 2
, the extent of replacement of the
endogenous protein varied with the period of induced expression of the
adventitious Flag-tagged protein (Fig. 2A)
and the
concentration of inducer (Fig. 2B)
. In the absence of
inducer, little or no adventitious protein was expressed, indicating
effective control of the regulated promoter. Adventitious TSG101
protein was first detected in elevated amounts 4 h after
induction, reached its maximum of twice the native level of endogenous
protein at 8 h, and was maintained at this level throughout the
experiment as long as inducer was present (Fig. 2A)
. After
8 h of induced expression of adventitious TSG101 by 1
µM MA, endogenous TSG101 began to decrease, and at
24 h, it was present in this experiment at 20% of the initial
level (Fig. 2A)
; the precise extent of reduction of
endogenous TSG101 varied slightly among different experiments. At a MA
concentration of 10 µM, adventitious TSG101 protein was
present at more than 10 times the amount of endogenous protein after
24 h of induction (Fig. 2B)
.

View larger version (51K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Inverse correlation between the endogenous and
adventitious TSG101 proteins. A representative stable cell line, human
Ecr293 transfected by the Flag-tagged mouse cDNA construct, was induced
to express the adventitious Flag-tagged mouse TSG101 protein
(Flag-TSG101). Total protein from 8 x 104
cells was loaded in each lane. Antibody against the full-length TSG101
protein was used for immunoblot analysis, whereas antibody against
-tubulin was used as an internal control to normalize loading.
A, time course of induced expression of the adventitious
protein. Cells at 40% confluence were induced by adding 1
µM MA to the medium and harvested at the times shown.
B, expression of the adventitious protein under different
inducer concentrations. Cultures were induced for 24 h using
different concentrations of MA. C, expression of the
adventitious protein after removal of the inducer. Cells were first
cultured in medium containing 1 µM MA for 24 h and
then cultured in medium lacking inducer for up to 48 h. They were
harvested at the time points for immunoblot analysis. D,
detection of the adventitious protein in subculture passages
continuously under induction. One-sixth of the previous cell culture
was inoculated for the next passage in each subculture. All subcultures
were grown either in the absence of inducer (0 µM MA) or
in the continuous presence of inducer (1 µM MA) until
harvested. P1P5, passages 15.
|
|
An inverse correlation between the intracellular levels of endogenous
and adventitious TSG101 protein was also observed when expression of
the adventitious protein was turned off by transfer of MA-induced cells
to medium lacking inducer (Fig. 2C)
. As Flag-tagged
adventitious TSG101 decayed, endogenous TSG101 gradually retuned to its
normal steady-state level. The ratio of Flag-tagged adventitious TSG101
protein:endogenous native protein remained unchanged during
subculturing of continuously induced transfected cell lines for more
than 30 doublings (Fig. 2D)
, indicating that the observed
replacement of endogenous protein with adventitious protein did not
result from selective growth of induced cells. Interestingly, the
observed 1.5- to 2-fold increase in total (i.e., endogenous
plus adventitious) TSG101 protein at the time of maximum induction was
associated with cell clumping and a more rounded cell morphology
compared with inducer-treated cells that did not overexpress TSG101
protein.
Down-Regulation of TSG101 Protein Is Posttranslational.
In contrast to the observations made for TSG101 protein, Northern
blot analysis showed that TSG101-specific mRNA increased 6- to 10-fold 24 h after the addition of 1 or 10 µM MA to
Ecr293 cells containing the Flag-tagged murine TSG101 construct
(Fig. 3
,left). During this time, endogenous (human) TSG101
transcripts, which were distinguishable from the adventitious (mouse)
transcripts using a probe that detects their distinct 3'-UTR (GenBank
accession number U82130) remained at a constant level (Fig. 3
,
middle). Given the observed dramatic decrease in endogenous
TSG101 protein under experimental conditions (Fig. 2)
, in which
endogenous mRNA production remained constant, the observed
down-regulation of TSG101 protein production must necessarily be
independent of any transcriptional control. To determine whether this
posttranscriptional control occurs at the level of translation, we
radioactively labeled total cellular protein with
[35S]methionine and analyzed the proteins
immunoprecipitated by excess anti-TSG101 antibody (Fig. 4A)
. In the absence of inducer, a single radioactive band whose rate of
synthesis was unaltered by the induced synthesis of adventitious
Flag-tagged TSG101 protein was observed, indicating that
translation of the adventitious protein does not interfere with the
synthesis of endogenous TSG101 and thus implying that the regulation of
intracellular TSG101 levels within a narrow range is accomplished
posttranslationally.

View larger version (64K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 3. Northern blot analysis of induced TSG101 transcripts.
Left, total TSG101 transcripts, including the adventitious
and endogenous transcripts in Ecr293 cells, were analyzed at different
concentrations of MA. The probe used to detect the sum of mouse and
human TSG101 transcripts was a mixture of both mouse and human
full-length TSG101 cDNAs in equal amount. Middle, the
endogenous transcript alone was analyzed in the same RNA samples using
the endogenous transcript-specific 3'-UTR of human TSG101 cDNA as
probe. Right, ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels served
as loading controls for RNA samples.
|
|

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. Posttranslational regulation of TSG101 protein
concentration. A, protein was labeled in vivo
with [35S]methionine for the indicated time periods under
induced and noninduced conditions. The cell line was derived by
transfecting the Flag-tagged mouse TSG101 cDNA construct into human
Ecr293 cells. To label proteins synthesized under induced conditions,
cells at about 30% confluence were preinduced by 5 µM PA
for 12 h and then labeled in presence of the inducer for the times
shown. Conditions were identical for noninduced labeling, except that
the inducer was replaced by the same volume of solvent. Antibody
against the COOH-terminal peptide was used for immunoprecipitation as
described in detail in "Materials and Methods." The bars
represent relative labeling intensities detected from phosphor image.
B, posttranslational turnover of the adventitious and
endogenous TSG101 proteins. Protein synthesized in vivo was
labeled for 1 h with or without induction as described for
A. This pulse was then chased by transfer to nonradioactive
media containing or lacking the inducer for the times indicated.
Immunoprecipitation and detection were as described in A.
|
|
The notion that almost-constant steady-state levels of TSG101 are
maintained within cells by a posttranslational mechanism was confirmed
by pulse-chase experiments in which proteins synthesized in cells
growing in the presence or absence of PA were labeled with
[35S]methionine for 1 h, transferred to media
containing excess unlabeled methionine, and then cultured for the times
shown. As seen in Fig. 4B
, after 8 h of nonradioactive
chase of the methionine pulse, the combined intracellular level of
labeled adventitious and endogenous TSG101 proteins was less than the
level of endogenous TSG101 alone in noninduced cells, indicating that
overexpression of adventitious TSG101 accelerates the turnover rate of
the entire intracellular pool of TSG101 protein. These findings
implicate enhanced protein decay as the mechanism that prevents
intracellular accumulation of TSG101 during overexpression of the
adventitious gene.
A Conserved Region within the COOH-terminal Domain Is Required for
TSG101 Protein Autoregulation.
To identify the TSG101 sequences involved in posttranslational
regulation of the intracellular concentration, we constructed a set of
in-frame short deletion mutations within murine TSG101 cDNA
and isolated stably transfected Ecr293 cell clones containing these
constructs (Fig. 5)
. Cell lines showing induced expression were obtained at a high frequency
for all constructs except SD4-28, which produced detectable protein in
only 5 of 40 clones. As seen in Fig. 5B
, four of five TSG101
mutant proteins containing short in-frame deletions (i.e.
constructs DS1-1, DS2-9, SD3-17, and SD4-28, respectively) retained the
ability to down-regulate endogenous TSG101 protein after induction,
whereas the product of construct SD5-59, in which a glycine residue
replaced four AAs (AAs 348351; Fig. 5B
), had little effect
on the intracellular level of endogenous protein. Confirmation that the
COOH-terminal end of adventitious TSG101 is necessary for
down-regulation of the endogenous protein was provided by our finding
that the LD1-18 construct, which lacks 42 AAs at the COOH-terminal end
of TSG101, totally lost this ability; additionally, unlike the
full-length adventitious TSG101 protein (Fig. 2)
, this overexpressed
deletion protein accumulated to 45 times the normal level of
endogenous TSG101 (Fig. 5B
, Fig. 5C
). Because the
AA residues removed in this construct are required for maintenance of
the steady-state level of TSG101 within a narrow range, this region of
TSG101 was termed the SB. The 3-AA internal deletion of SD5-59, which
significantly reduced the ability of TSG101 protein to down-regulate
its own intracellular level, is located in the SB (see Fig. 7
).

View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 5. Mutations at the COOH-terminal domain of the adventitious
protein affect down-regulation of the endogenous TSG101 protein.
A, summary of results for the tested DNA constructs, which
are mutant derivatives of mouse TSG101 cDNA. These constructs were all
introduced by transfection into Ecr293, and stable cell lines were
established. UBC, TSG101 domain resembling
ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme; PPPP, proline-rich domain;
CC2, coiled coil domain, SB, the steadiness box
defined in these experiments (see text); , short in-frame deletions;
F, Flag tag. The mutations are as follows: SD1-1 has a
deletion of AAs 4143; SD2-9 has a replacement of AAs 5052 by Phe;
SD3-17 has a deletion of AAs 193195; SD4-28 has a replacement of AAs
273276 by Asp; and SD559 has a replacement of AAs 348351 by Gly.
The deletion sites and fusion junctions involving the COOH-terminal
regions are indicated in Fig. 7
: LD1-18 has a deletion of 42 AAs at the
COOH-terminal; Z-cPEP1 and Z-cPEP2 were generated by fusing E.
coli LacZ with cPEP1 and cPEP2, respectively (see "Materials and
Methods" for details). B, immunoblot analysis showing the
effects of mutated adventitious TSG101 protein on the endogenous
protein. Multiple stable transfectant cell lines were tested for each
mutated construct, and all showed results similar to those seen here
for one representative cell line. Cells were cultured with or without 5
µM PA induction for 24 h as shown. Total cellular
protein was adjusted to the same concentration before assay of the
induced and noninduced cell lines. Antibody against the full-length
TSG101 protein was used in immunoblot analyses. C, induction
time course for expression of LD1-18 in Ecr293. The protein amount was
the same for each lane. The arrow represents endogenous
TSG101 protein. D, induction time course for expression of
fused proteins containing TSG101 COOH-terminal peptides. Antibody was
specifically directed against the COOH-terminal peptide of TSG101
(2)
. Arrow, endogenous TSG101 protein;
asterisk, internal control.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 7. COOH-terminal-deleted TSG101 protein fails to affect
turnover of the endogenous TSG101. Left, a cell line
containing Flag-tagged full-length mouse TSG101 cDNA construct produced
an adventitious protein, Flag-tagged mouse TSG101 on induction.
Right, a cell line containing LD1-18 (a
COOH-terminal-deleted mouse cDNA construct) adventitiously expressed a
deleted TSG101 protein ( TSG) on induction. The two cell lines were
preinduced for 12 h, pulse-labeled for 1 h, and then chased
in fresh medium. In all these steps, the media were supplemented with 5
µM PA as an inducer. Cells were then collected after the
indicated times and analyzed by immunoprecipitation. Induced expression
of the adventitious TSG101 proteins was monitored by immunoblotting in
the two cell lines immediately before labeling, as shown in the
boxed insert. Antibody against the COOH-terminal peptide,
which detected both adventitious and endogenous full-length TSG101
protein (left) and full-length endogenous TSG101
(right) was used for subsequent immunoprecepitations. The
bars represent relative labeling intensities detected by
phosphor image after the bands were separated on DSD/PAGE gel.
|
|
To determine whether the COOH-terminal region alone is sufficient for
down-regulation, we constructed proteins containing TSG101
COOH-terminal peptides fused to LacZ gene and generated cell
lines expressing the fusion proteins (Fig. 5D)
. Production
of these adventitious proteins at a level equivalent to or higher than
the endogenous protein failed to show a detectable decrease of
endogenous TSG101.
Pulse-chase experiments comparing the turnover rate of endogenous
TSG101 protein in cells that had been transfected by TSG101 cDNA
constructs containing or lacking the SB (Fig. 5)
directly implicated
the SB in TSG101 turnover. As seen in Fig. 6
,left, endogenous TSG101 was decreased by two-thirds during
the first 8 h of chase in cells overexpressing adventitious
Flag-tagged full-length TSG101 protein. However, cells showing
comparable overexpression of adventitious LD1-18 protein (Fig. 6
,
insert), which lacks the SB, showed much less reduction of
endogenous TSG101, suggesting that the mutant is defective in its
inability to accelerate decay of the endogenous full-length protein.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Our results indicate that the steady-state level of TSG101 protein
normally is maintained within a narrow range during cell growth by a
mechanism that operates at the level of protein decay. Overexpression
of adventitious Flag-tagged TSG101 protein resulted in down-regulation
of the endogenous protein without affecting the intracellular level of
endogenous TSG101 mRNA, indicating that the observed autoregulation of
TSG101 expression occurs posttranscriptionally. Pulse-chase experiments
showed that overexpression of adventitious TSG101 leads to increased
turnover of both the endogenous and adventitious TSG101 proteins,
limiting the ability of TSG101 to accumulate within cells. Continued
overproduction of adventitious TSG101, accompanied by continued
accelerated turnover of the total intracellular TSG101 protein pool,
results in effective replacement of the endogenous TSG101 protein by
the adventitious protein.
These findings suggest a model in which the biological effects of
TSG101 are modulated either by self-promoted proteolysis or
participation with other cellular protein(s) in a proteolytic feedback
control loop. The posttranslational autoregulation observed for TSG101
at the level of protein decay is reminiscent of the mechanism that
prevents intracellular accumulation of the product of another tumor
susceptibility gene, p53 (21)
. In that case,
overproduction of p53 promotes the synthesis of the MDM2 protein, which
in turn accelerates p53 degradation (22
, 23)
. If TSG101
participates in an analogous feedback control loop with a second
protein, its partner in the loop is also likely to be affected by
alterations in TSG101 production.
The ability of overexpressed TSG101 to accelerate its own degradation
is consistent with the proposal that TSG101 may have a role in
proteolysis (14
, 15)
. However, the COOH-terminal SB region
that our studies show is necessary for normal regulation of the
intracellular concentration of TSG101 is distinct from the
ubiquitin-conjugase-like domain previously identified in the
NH2-terminal region of TSG101. TSG101 derivatives lacking
or mutated in the SB accumulate at several times the normal level while
also not reducing the concentration of endogenous TSG101 protein,
demonstrating a crucial role for this region in TSG101 autoregulation.
However, truncated adventitious proteins containing only the SB fail to
accomplish down-regulation of endogenous TSG101 (Fig. 6)
, indicating
that the SB alone is insufficient. Interestingly, the SB and its
flanking sequences are the most conserved regions of TSG101 homology
among yeast, Caenorhabditis elegans, and mammals (Fig. 7)
, suggesting an evolutionarily preserved function in these disparate
organisms. Sequence similarity in the SB is 69% between C.
elegans and human or mouse and 56% between yeast and these
mammals. Among the 45 AAs in the SB, there are 21 AAs (47%) conserved
and 11 identical AAs (24%) in all four species.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported in part by the 1993 Helmut Horten
Research Award (to S. N. C.), by a grant from the National Foundation
for Cancer Research, and by a gift from the Chiron Corporation. 
2 Present address: Cereon Genomics, 45 Sidney
Street, Cambridge, MA 02139. 
3 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed. Phone: (650) 723-5315; Fax: (650) 725-1536; E-mail: sncohen{at}stanford.edu 
4 The abbreviations used are: SB, steadiness box;
AA, amino acid; MA, muristerone A; PA, ponasterone A; UTR, untranslated
region. 
Received 9/28/99.
Accepted 2/11/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Li L., Cohen S. N. Tsg101: a novel tumor susceptibility gene isolated by controlled homozygous functional knockout of allelic loci in mammalian cells. Cell, 85: 319-329, 1996.[Medline]
-
Xie W., Li L., Cohen S. N. Cell cycle-dependent subcellular localization of the TSG101 protein and mitotic and nuclear abnormalities associated with TSG101 deficiency. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 1595-1600, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Li L., Li X., Francke U., Cohen S. N. The TSG101 tumor susceptibility gene is located in chromosome 11 band p15 and is mutated in human breast cancer. Cell, 88: 143-154, 1997.[Medline]
-
Li L., Francke U., Cohen S. N. Retraction. The TSG101 tumor susceptibility gene is located in chromosome 11 band p15 and is mutated in human breast cancer. Cell, 93: 660 1998.
-
Steiner P., Barnes D. M., Harris W. H., Weinberg R. A. Absence of rearrangements in the tumour susceptibility gene TSG101 in human breast cancer. Nat. Genet., 16: 332-333, 1997.[Medline]
-
Gayther S. A., Barski P., Batley S. J., Li L., de Foy K. A., Cohen S. N., Ponder B. A., Caldas C. Aberrant splicing of the TSG101 and FHIT genes occurs frequently in multiple malignancies and in normal tissues and mimics alterations previously described in tumours. Oncogene, 15: 2119-2126, 1997.[Medline]
-
Lee M. P., Feinberg A. P. Aberrant splicing but not mutations of TSG101 in human breast cancer. Cancer Res., 57: 3131-3134, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Wang Q., Driouch K., Courtois S., Champeme M. H., Bieche I., Treilleux I., Briffod M., Rimokh R., Magaud J. P., Curmi P., Lidereau R., Puisieux A. Low frequency of TSG101/CC2 gene alterations in invasive human breast cancers. Oncogene, 16: 677-679, 1998.[Medline]
-
Wagner K. U., Dierisseau P., Rucker E. B., III, Robinson G. W., Hennighausen L. Genomic architecture and transcriptional activation of the mouse and human tumor susceptibility gene TSG101: common types of shorter transcripts are true alternative splice variants. Oncogene, 17: 2761-2770, 1998.[Medline]
-
Carney M. E., Maxwell G. L., Lancaster J. M., Gumbs C., Marks J., Berchuck A., Futreal P. A. Aberrant splicing of the TSG101 tumor suppressor gene in human breast and ovarian cancers. J. Soc. Gynecol. Investig., 5: 281-285, 1998.[Medline]
-
Lin S. Y., Chen Y. J., Chang J. G. Multiple truncated transcripts of TSG101 in gastrointestinal cancers. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol., 13: 1111-1114, 1998.[Medline]
-
Oh Y., Proctor M. L., Fan Y. H., Su L. K., Hong W. K., Fong K. M., Sekido Y. S., Gazdar A. F., Minna J. D., Mao L. TSG101 is not mutated in lung cancer but a shortened transcript is frequently expressed in small cell lung cancer. Oncogene, 17: 1141-1148, 1998.[Medline]
-
Sun Z., Pan J., Bubley G., Balk S. P. Frequent abnormalities of TSG101 transcripts in human prostate cancer. Oncogene, 15: 3121-3125, 1997.[Medline]
-
Ponting C. P., Cai Y.D., Bork P. The breast cancer gene product TSG101: a regulator of ubiquitination?. J. Mol. Med., 75: 467-469, 1997.[Medline]
-
Koonin E. V., Abagyan R. A. TSG101 may be the prototype of a class of dominant negative ubiquitin regulators. Nat. Genet., 16: 330-331, 1997.[Medline]
-
Watanabe M., Yanagi Y., Masuhiro Y., Yano T., Yoshikawa H., Yanagisawa J., Kato S. A putative tumor suppressor, TSG101, acts as a transcriptional suppressor through its coiled-coil domain. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 245: 900-905, 1998.[Medline]
-
Sun Z., Pan J., Hope W. X., Cohen S. N., Balk S. P. Tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein represses androgen receptor transactivation and interacts with p300. Cancer (Phila.), 86: 689-696, 1999.[Medline]
-
Hittelman, A. B., Burakov, D., Iñiguez-Lluhí, J. A., Freedman, L. P., and Garabedian, M. J. Differential regulation of glucocorticoid receptor transcriptional activation. EMBO J., in press, 2000.
-
Zhong Q., Chen Y., Jones D., Lee W. H. Perturbation of TSG101 protein affects cell cycle progression. Cancer Res., 58: 2699-2702, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F., and Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Ed. 2. Plainview, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1989.
-
Haupt Y., Maya R., Kazaz A., Oren M. Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53. Nature (Lond.), 387: 296-299, 1997.[Medline]
-
Kubbutat M. H., Jones S. N., Vousden K. H. Regulation of p53 stability by Mdm2. Nature (Lond.), 387: 299-303, 1997.[Medline]
-
Kubbutat M. H., Ludwig R. L., Ashcroft M., Vousden K. H. Regulation of Mdm2-directed degradation by the C terminus of p53. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 5690-5698, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zhong Q., Chen C. F., Chen Y., Chen P. L., Lee W. H. Identification of cellular TSG101 protein in multiple human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res., 57: 4225-4228, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Devereux J., Haeberli P., Smithies O. A comprehensive set of sequence analysis programs for the VAX. Nucleic Acids Res., 12: 387-395, 1984.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. McDonald and J. Martin-Serrano
Regulation of Tsg101 Expression by the Steadiness Box: A Role of Tsg101-associated Ligase
Mol. Biol. Cell,
February 1, 2008;
19(2):
754 - 763.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. W. Young, F. C. Mei, D. G. Rosen, G. Yang, N. Li, J. Liu, and X. Cheng
Up-regulation of Tumor Susceptibility Gene 101 Protein in Ovarian Carcinomas Revealed by Proteomics Analyses
Mol. Cell. Proteomics,
February 1, 2007;
6(2):
294 - 304.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
T.-H. Cheng and S. N. Cohen
Human MDM2 Isoforms Translated Differentially on Constitutive versus p53-Regulated Transcripts Have Distinct Functions in the p53/MDM2 and TSG101/MDM2 Feedback Control Loops
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
January 1, 2007;
27(1):
111 - 119.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Spitzer, S. Schellmann, A. Sabovljevic, M. Shahriari, C. Keshavaiah, N. Bechtold, M. Herzog, S. Muller, F.-G. Hanisch, and M. Hulskamp
The Arabidopsis elch mutant reveals functions of an ESCRT component in cytokinesis.
Development,
December 1, 2006;
133(23):
4679 - 4689.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Langelier, U. K. von Schwedler, R. D. Fisher, I. De Domenico, P. L. White, C. P. Hill, J. Kaplan, D. Ward, and W. I. Sundquist
Human ESCRT-II Complex and Its Role in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Release
J. Virol.,
October 1, 2006;
80(19):
9465 - 9480.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. O. Olabisi, G. M. Mahon, E. V. Kostenko, Z. Liu, H. L. Ozer, and I. P. Whitehead
Bcr interacts with components of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport-I and is required for epidermal growth factor receptor turnover.
Cancer Res.,
June 15, 2006;
66(12):
6250 - 6257.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. J. Carstens, A. Krempler, A. A. Triplett, M. van Lohuizen, and K.-U. Wagner
Cell Cycle Arrest and Cell Death Are Controlled by p53-dependent and p53-independent Mechanisms in Tsg101-deficient Cells
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
35984 - 35994.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Stuchell, J. E. Garrus, B. Muller, K. M. Stray, S. Ghaffarian, R. McKinnon, H.-G. Krausslich, S. G. Morham, and W. I. Sundquist
The Human Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT-I) and Its Role in HIV-1 Budding
J. Biol. Chem.,
August 20, 2004;
279(34):
36059 - 36071.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Amit, L. Yakir, M. Katz, Y. Zwang, M. D. Marmor, A. Citri, K. Shtiegman, I. Alroy, S. Tuvia, Y. Reiss, et al.
Tal, a Tsg101-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase, regulates receptor endocytosis and retrovirus budding
Genes & Dev.,
July 15, 2004;
18(14):
1737 - 1752.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Teo, D. B. Veprintsev, and R. L. Williams
Structural Insights into Endosomal Sorting Complex Required for Transport (ESCRT-I) Recognition of Ubiquitinated Proteins
J. Biol. Chem.,
July 2, 2004;
279(27):
28689 - 28696.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Burgdorf, P. Leister, and K. H. Scheidtmann
TSG101 Interacts with Apoptosis-antagonizing Transcription Factor and Enhances Androgen Receptor-mediated Transcription by Promoting Its Monoubiquitination
J. Biol. Chem.,
April 23, 2004;
279(17):
17524 - 17534.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
J. Yasuda, M. Nakao, Y. Kawaoka, and H. Shida
Nedd4 Regulates Egress of Ebola Virus-Like Particles from Host Cells
J. Virol.,
September 15, 2003;
77(18):
9987 - 9992.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Goff, L. S. Ehrlich, S. N. Cohen, and C. A. Carter
Tsg101 Control of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Gag Trafficking and Release
J. Virol.,
September 1, 2003;
77(17):
9173 - 9182.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
O. Pornillos, D. S. Higginson, K. M. Stray, R. D. Fisher, J. E. Garrus, M. Payne, G.-P. He, H. E. Wang, S. G. Morham, and W. I. Sundquist
HIV Gag mimics the Tsg101-recruiting activity of the human Hrs protein
J. Cell Biol.,
August 4, 2003;
162(3):
425 - 434.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Q. Lu, L. W. Hope, M. Brasch, C. Reinhard, and S. N. Cohen
TSG101 interaction with HRS mediates endosomal trafficking and receptor down-regulation
PNAS,
June 24, 2003;
100(13):
7626 - 7631.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. Goila-Gaur, D. G. Demirov, J. M. Orenstein, A. Ono, and E. O. Freed
Defects in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Budding and Endosomal Sorting Induced by TSG101 Overexpression
J. Virol.,
June 1, 2003;
77(11):
6507 - 6519.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. Krempler, M. D. Henry, A. A. Triplett, and K.-U. Wagner
Targeted Deletion of the Tsg101 Gene Results in Cell Cycle Arrest at G1/S and p53-independent Cell Death
J. Biol. Chem.,
November 1, 2002;
277(45):
43216 - 43223.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. L. Myers and J. F. Allen
Tsg101, an Inactive Homologue of Ubiquitin Ligase E2, Interacts Specifically with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 Gag Polyprotein and Results in Increased Levels of Ubiquitinated Gag
J. Virol.,
October 11, 2002;
76(22):
11226 - 11235.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Oh, C. Mammucari, A. Nenci, S. Cabodi, S. N. Cohen, and G. P. Dotto
Negative regulation of cell growth and differentiation by TSG101 through association with p21Cip1/WAF1
PNAS,
April 16, 2002;
99(8):
5430 - 5435.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. VerPlank, F. Bouamr, T. J. LaGrassa, B. Agresta, A. Kikonyogo, J. Leis, and C. A. Carter
Tsg101, a homologue of ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzymes, binds the L domain in HIV type 1 Pr55Gag
PNAS,
June 20, 2001;
(2001)
131059198.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. Li, J. Liao, J. Ruland, T. W. Mak, and S. N. Cohen
A TSG101/MDM2 regulatory loop modulates MDM2 degradation and MDM2/p53 feedback control
PNAS,
February 13, 2001;
98(4):
1619 - 1624.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Oh, C. Mammucari, A. Nenci, S. Cabodi, S. N. Cohen, and G. P. Dotto
Negative regulation of cell growth and differentiation by TSG101 through association with p21Cip1/WAF1
PNAS,
April 16, 2002;
99(8):
5430 - 5435.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
L. VerPlank, F. Bouamr, T. J. LaGrassa, B. Agresta, A. Kikonyogo, J. Leis, and C. A. Carter
Tsg101, a homologue of ubiquitin-conjugating (E2) enzymes, binds the L domain in HIV type 1 Pr55Gag
PNAS,
July 3, 2001;
98(14):
7724 - 7729.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|