
[Cancer Research 60, 1777-1788, April 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
p53 Antibodies in the Sera of Patients with Various Types of Cancer: A Review1
Thierry Soussi2
Laboratoire de génotoxicologie des tumeurs, Institut Curie, 75248 Paris, France
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
p53 antibodies (p53-Abs) were discovered 20 years ago during the course
of tumor-associated antigens screening. The discovery of p53 mutation
and accumulation of p53 in human tumors shed new light on the p53
humoral response. In the present review, we have compiled more than 130
papers published in this specific field since 1992. We demonstrate that
p53-Abs are found predominantly in human cancer patients with a
specificity of 96%. Such antibodies are predominantly associated with
p53 gene missense mutations and p53 accumulation
in the tumor, but the sensitivity of such detection is only 30%. It
has been demonstrated that this immune response is due to a
self-immunization process linked to the strong immunogenicity of the
p53 protein. The clinical value of these antibodies remains subject to
debate, but consistent results have been observed in breast, colon,
oral, and gastric cancers, in which they have been associated with
high-grade tumors and poor survival. The finding of p53-Abs in the sera
of individuals who are at high risk of cancer, such as exposed workers
or heavy smokers, indicates that they have promising potential in the
early detection of cancer.
 |
Introduction
|
|---|
The discovery of the p53 protein was the culmination of two types
of studies: (a) the very well known virological approach,
with the binding of p53 protein to oncoviral proteins
(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)
; and (b) the more discrete serological
approach with the study of
TAAs3
(6
, 7)
. In 1979, DeLeo et al. (7)
showed that the humoral response of mice to some
methylcholanthrene-induced tumor cells such as MethA was directed to
the p53 protein. This protein was found to accumulate in tumor cells of
different origin but was undetectable in normal cells. It was also
found that animals bearing SV40 tumors elicited an immune response
specific for p53 (1
, 5
, 6)
. In 1982, Crawford et
al. (8)
first described antibodies against human p53
protein in 9% of breast cancer patient sera. No significant clinical
correlation was reported, and, at that time, no information was
available concerning mutations of the p53 gene. Caron de
Fromentel et al. (8)
later found that
such antibodies were present in sera of children with a wide variety of
cancers. The average frequency was 12%, but this figure increased to
20% in Burkitts lymphoma.
Those studies, performed in the early 1980s, were virtually ignored for
more than 10 years because of a lack of interest in p53 during that
period. In the early 1990s, it was discovered that the p53
gene is the most common target for molecular alteration in every type
of human cancer (10)
. This provoked considerable interest
in the study of the p53 protein and its function in normal and
transformed cells. It also led to the rediscovery of this humoral
response, which had been found in cancer patients. Since 1992, more
than 150 papers have been published on p53-Abs. This review will
summarize this literature and focus on the future applications of this
assay.
For a comprehensive view of the p53 discovery, the reader is referred
to the excellent review published by Crawford (11)
. More
reviews on p53 have recently been published (12, 13, 14, 15)
.
 |
The p53 Protein
|
|---|
The tumor suppressor p53 is a phosphoprotein barely detectable in
the nucleus of normal cells (16)
. On cellular stress,
particularly that induced by DNA damage, p53 can arrest cell cycle
progression, thus, allowing the DNA to be repaired (17)
or
it can lead to apoptosis (18)
. These functions are
achieved, in part, by the transactivational properties of p53, which
activate a series of genes involved in cell cycle regulation. In cancer
cells that bear a mutant p53, this protein is no longer able to control
cell proliferation, which results in inefficient DNA repair and the
emergence of genetically unstable cells (12, 13, 14, 15)
. The most
common changes of p53 in human cancers are point missense mutations
within the coding sequences of the gene (10
, 19)
. Such
mutations are found in all of the major histogenetic groups, including
cancers of the colon, stomach, breast, lung, brain, and esophagus
(20)
. It is estimated that p53 mutations is the
most frequent genetic event in human cancers and accounts for more than
50% of cases. More than 90% of the point mutations reported thus far
are clustered between exons 4 and 10 and are localized in the DNA
binding domain of the p53 protein (21)
. One of the most
striking features of the inactive mutant p53 protein is its increased
stability (half-life of several hours compared with 20 min for
wild-type p53) and its accumulation in the nucleus of neoplastic cells.
Positive immunostaining is usually indicative of abnormalities of the
p53 gene and its product, but it is highly dependent on the
type of p53 mutation for review (22
, 23)
.
 |
The Specificity of p53 Antibodies in Cancer Patients
|
|---|
Dosage of p53 Antibodies.
The initial work on p53-Abs used either immunoprecipitation or Western
blot as the detection method (8
, 9)
. Later, several ELISAs
were developed to handle large numbers of specimens (24
, 25) , and some of them are now commercially available. The
diversity of all of these assays could account for the variation in the
frequency of p53-Abs observed in the literature. One of the most
important parameters seems to be the antigen used for these assays. It
has been shown that p53-Ab recognized immunodominant epitopes localized
in the NH2 and COOH termini of the protein (see
below). It is thus essential to use the entire p53 protein as
antigen. Several attempts to develop an ELISA with synthetic peptides
corresponding to these immunodominant epitopes have been unsuccessful,
because they lead to a high level of false-negative results
(26)
.
p53 is heavily phosphorylated at the NH2 and COOH
termini. Such phosphorylation can have an important influence on the
reactivity of p53-Abs toward the protein, which suggests that p53
expressed in mammalian cell is a better antigen than those expressed
in Escherichia coli. Recently, it has been shown that
IgA p53-Abs are found as the only isotype in some patients with head
and neck cancers. The fact that a majority of ELISAs use a secondary
antibody specific for IgG may eventually lead to false-negative
sera.4
p53-Abs have also been found in other body fluids such as the ascites
of women with ovarian cancer, the pleural effusions of patients with
pancreatic, colon, and lung tumors, and the saliva of patients with
oral cancer (27, 28, 29)
. Such antibodies are correlated with
serum p53-Abs (27
, 28)
.
p53 Antibodies and p53 Mutation Frequency.
Eighty serological analyses of p53 status in 18 cancer types that were
published before August 1999 have been compiled (Table 1
). Control experiments were performed in 36 studies, involving 2404
individuals who were either healthy or had nonmalignant diseases.
Studies involving 9489 patients with various types of cancer were
analyzed. Statistical analysis demonstrated that p53 antibodies are a
specific marker of patients with neoplasia (P < 10-4; Table 2
). An analysis of p53-Abs in each type of cancer also showed a
significant correlation with malignant diseases for most types of
cancer except for testicular carcinoma, melanoma, hepatoma, and glioma,
in which the frequency of p53-Abs was very similar to that of the
control group (Table 2)
. Fig. 1
shows the correlation between the frequency of p53-Abs and the
frequency of p53 mutations published in the literature. There is a very
strong correlation between the two rates, again arguing that p53
mutations are involved in the appearance of these antibodies. Apart
from the healthy control, it is striking to observe that three cancers,
well-known to be devoid of p53 mutations, hepatoma (30)
,
testicular carcinoma (31
, 32)
, and melanoma (33
, 34)
, are also negative for p53-Abs. However, cancers such as
esophageal carcinoma and oral squamous cell carcinoma, which
have a high rate of p53 mutations, also have a high frequency of
p53-Abs. The only exception is glioma, with a very low rate of p53-Abs
(35
, 36)
despite a high frequency of p53 mutations
(37)
. In a complete study involving both molecular and
serological analyses, Rainov et al. (35)
found
p53 mutations in 24 of 60 glioblastomas, but none of these patients had
p53-Abs. Several explanations can account for the lack of a p53 immune
response in this type of cancer. It is possible that the immune
privilege of the brain does not allow the induction of this humoral
response. It is also possible that there is inefficient antigen
presentation if p53 cannot cross the brain barrier, or if no immune
response can be elicited in the brain. Furthermore, we should keep in
mind that, in one series, 70% of the patients were treated with
dexamethasone before serum collection (35)
, which can
induce perturbation in the immune response. In the other studies, such
information was not available.

View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1. Relationship between the frequency of p53 mutation and
p53 antibodies in various types of cancer. The frequency of p53
mutations is taken from the literature, and the frequency of p53-Abs is
taken from Table 1
.
|
|
 |
Relationship between p53 Antibodies, p53 Mutations, and p53
Accumulation
|
|---|
There is generally a very good correlation between the presence of
p53-Abs and p53 accumulation and/or mutation in the tumor. Winter
et al. (38)
have shown that only missense
mutations can lead to a p53 humoral response. As shown in Table 1
, this
finding was confirmed by numerous studies.
Only a subset of patients with p53 mutations will have p53 antibodies
in their tumor. As shown in Fig. 1
, about 2040% of patients with a
p53 mutation will have p53-Abs in their sera. These results are not due
to a lack of sensitivity of the current methods of detection but to a
real absence of p53-Abs. It had been suggested that only p53 mutations
that are localized in exons 5 and 6 with an altered protein
conformation and that bind to hsp 70 are associated with p53-Abs
(39
, 40)
. These analyses, performed on a small
number of patients, were not confirmed in larger series of patients.
Indeed, a compilation of all of the serological analyses performed in
conjunction with molecular analyses indicates that the repartition of
p53 mutations in patients with p53-Abs is similar to that in patients
without antibodies (Fig. 2
). Several studies have shown that, despite similar types of cancer,
identical p53 mutation, and p53 accumulation, some patients could be
either positive or negative for p53-Abs (41, 42, 43, 44)
. These
observations demonstrate that other factors contribute to this humoral
response. Examination of p53-Abs during follow-up of patients during
therapy indicates that the level of p53-Abs can vary depending
on the tumor burden (see below). Follow-up of patients who were
devoid of p53-Abs at the time of diagnosis failed to detect any
de novo antibody production after therapy failure or relapse
despite p53 accumulation in the tumor and a long follow-up. This
suggests that the capacity to elicit this humoral response is linked to
the biological background of the patients. It is possible that, for an
identical mutation, the immune response is dependent on the specific
combination of MHC class I and II molecules expressed by each
individual.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2. Distribution of p53 mutations and p53-Abs in patients in
whom both serological and molecular analyses were performed.
|
|
There may be several explanations for the presence of p53-Abs in tumors
with a wild-type p53. Technical failure cannot be neglected and is
difficult to assess, nor can we exclude the possibility that the
tumor is composed of heterogeneous tissue and that the fragment
analyzed does not bear p53 alteration. We should also keep in mind that
serological analysis is a global assay that does not depend on
sampling. An undetectable metastasis with p53 alteration might be
associated with a p53-negative primary tumor. As discussed
below, the mechanism that leads to the formation of these
antibodies is poorly understood. Accumulation may be an important
component in the development of this immune response, but we cannot
exclude the fact that modified processing of the mutated protein
can also lead to such a response.
 |
Specificity of p53 Antibodies
|
|---|
As stated above, mutant p53 accumulation is an important component
of this humoral response. Thus, it is possible that such antibodies are
specific to mutant p53 or at least to a mutant p53 conformation.
Several works have shown that these antibodies recognize both wild-type
and mutant p53 (38
, 45
, 46)
. Using a set of overlapping
synthetic peptides corresponding to human p53, precise mapping of the
epitopes of p53 protein recognized by p53-Abs was performed
(47)
. This method is very powerful and very rapid for the
analysis of a large number of sample. Nevertheless, we should bear in
mind that it only works with antibodies that recognize small linear
epitopes. Analysis of more than 200 sera from various types of cancer
unambiguously demonstrated that these antibodies recognize
immunodominant epitopes localized in the NH2
terminus and, to a lesser extent, in the COOH terminus of human p53
(26
, 47
, 48)
. Only a few antibodies recognize the central
region of the p53 protein that harbors the mutations. We know that the
identification of such epitopes is not due to a technical bias based on
the use of short synthetic peptides because immunoprecipitation and
immunoblot analysis of truncated p53 have led to the same observation
(45
, 48) .
Such a finding is totally in accordance with the work performed in mice
on the production of p53 monoclonal antibodies. Immunization of mice
with murine, xenopus, or human wild-type p53 led to the production of
monoclonal antibodies directed to linear epitopes localized in the
NH2 and COOH termini of p53
(49, 50, 51, 52)
. The analysis of mouse sera immunized with these
proteins indicates that it is due to a specific immune response of the
mouse toward this region of the protein and not to a bias in the
selection of the hybridoma (49)
. Monoclonal antibodies
specific for the central region of the protein were obtained only after
a special immunization or selection procedure (53
, 54)
.
Taken together (a) the presence of immunodominant epitopes
outside the hot spot region of the p53 mutation; (b) the
correlation between p53 accumulation (and p53 gene mutation)
in tumor cells and p53-Abs responses; (c) the similarity of
humoral responses in patients independent of the cancer type; and
(d) the similarity of antigenic site profiles in patients
and hyperimmunized animalsall suggest that p53 accumulation is the
major component of the humoral response in patients with cancer. This
accumulation could lead to a self-immunization process culminating in
the appearance of p53-Abs. As stated above, the level of p53 proteins
in a normal organism is very low, which suggests very weak (if any)
tolerance to endogenous p53. Isotyping of p53-Abs has shown that they
correspond mainly to IgG1 and IgG2 subclasses, although some patients
exhibit a predominant IgA response (25)
. Some patients
also had IgM, although none had p53 IgM as the only isotype. No IgG3 or
IgG4 was detected. Again, this result strengthens the hypothesis of an
active humoral response to p53.
It is not clear whether p53 mutation is really required for the
production of p53-Abs or whether the sole accumulation of p53 protein
can lead to this humoral response. This question is difficult to answer
because there is no normal situation of wild-type p53 accumulation in
humans that could be used to test this hypothesis. On the other hand,
such a situation occurs in animals. p53-Abs have been discovered in the
sera of animals that bear tumors induced by SV40 (1
, 5)
.
In such tumors, wild-type p53 is stabilized through its interaction
with SV40 large T antigen. These observations indicate that p53
accumulation alone is the main component of this autoimmunization.
The mechanism by which p53 is presented to the immune system is
unknown. It is possible that it is released after cell necrosis, but
thus far, p53 has not been found reproducibly in human sera (see
below; 55
, 56
). Either the p53 protein is very
rapidly eliminated from sera, or else other mechanisms of p53
presentation are involved.
X-ray crystallography of human p53 was an important step in the
understanding of the structure of this protein. The central region
(amino acids 102292) was crystallized in the form of a protein-DNA
complex (57)
. This core region has been shown to include
the following motifs: (a) two antiparallel ß sheets
composed of four and five ß-strands, respectively. These two sheets
form a kind of compact sandwich that holds the other elements;
(b) a LSH containing three ß-strands, an
-helix, and the L1 loop; (c) an L2 loop containing
a small helix; and (d) an L3 loop composed mainly of turns.
It is quite remarkable to note the striking correspondence between
these various structural elements and the four evolutionarily conserved
blocks (II to V). The LSH motif and the L3 helix are involved in direct
DNA interaction (LSH with the major groove and L3 with the minor
groove). The L2 loop is presumed to provide stabilization by
associating with the L3 loop. These two loops are held together by a
zinc atom tetracoordinated to Cys176 and His179 on the L2 loop and to
Cys278 and Cys242 on the L3 loop.
Furthermore, the conformational changes in p53 were dissected by a new
battery of monoclonal antibodies directed against the central region of
the protein (53)
. None of these antibodies was able to
recognize native, wild-type p53. On the other hand, regardless of the
location of their epitopes, they were all able to recognize p53 mutants
that had undergone conformational changes (53)
. This
result indicates that the central region of wild-type p53 protein has a
very compact structure that is held in place by the two antiparallel B
sheets. Such conformation and the observation that this region is
highly hydrophobic explain its poor immunogenicity.
A recent study (58)
indicates that critical residues of
epitopes recognized by several anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies
correspond to key residues of p53 involved in interaction of the mdm2
protein with the NH2 terminus of the p53 protein.
This can explain why such a region is at the surface of the molecule.
It should also be mentioned that the p53 protein, whatever its
phylogenetic origin, is an incredibly potent antigen. Immunization of
mice with p53 requires only a small amount of protein, and adjuvant is
not necessary to obtain a high titer of
antibodies.5
Recently, several p53 homologues have been identified
(59, 60, 61, 62)
. Although, the conservation of the sequence is
only partial, it is conceivable that p53-Abs could either cross-react
with such proteins or were produced toward one of the homologues.
Extensive assays of sera with or without p53-Abs indicate that most
sera are specific for p53. Nevertheless, specific antibodies toward p73
have been
detected.6
 |
p53 Antibodies and Clinical Parameters
|
|---|
Numerous studies have attempted to evaluate the clinical value of
p53-Abs (Table 1)
. As for p53 mutation and p53 immunohistochemical
analysis, these studies have reported contradictory results. Before
examining them, one should bear in mind one question that has not been
assessed thus far, i.e., the role of such antibodies in the
neoplastic process. This question has never been thoroughly discussed
or experimentally tested. During our lifetime, it is quite possible
that we experience several unknown precancers that arise after a
genetic variation in an oncogene or a tumor suppressor gene. Such
preneoplastic cancers could be quickly eliminated either because the
mechanisms that control cellular proliferation have been able to
overcome these tumoral cells or because they have been eliminated from
the organism through various surveillance mechanisms including the
immune system. It is plausible that early p53 accumulation, such as
that seen in lung or oral cancer, can lead to the production of a
humoral and cellular response that participates in the elimination of
the tumor. Such a hypothesis is supported by the work of Roth et
al. (63)
. Immunization with canarypox virus
recombinants that expressed human or murine p53 protected BALB/c mice
from a challenge with a highly tumorigenic mouse fibroblast tumor cell
line that express high levels of mutant p53. This tumor
protection was equally effective regardless of whether wild-type or
mutant p53 was used for the immunization, which indicated that the
immunological response was not dependent on any particular p53 mutation
and that immunization with this live virus vaccine works effectively
against mutant p53 protein expressed in a tumor cell (63)
.
Although there is no formal proof that a natural response toward p53
can protect from precancerous tumor, it is not possible to exclude such
a hypothesis. However, it is quite possible that such an immune
response is totally neutral toward the organism and is simply the
consequence of self-immunization toward a self-protein. In that case,
any clinical correlation with p53-Abs would be due to the presence of
p53 inactivation via mutation.
In breast cancer, several studies indicate that p53-Abs are found in
patients with tumors that have high grades and/or that are negative for
steroid hormone receptors (8
, 24
, 45
, 64
, 65) , two
clinical parameters already known to be associated with p53 mutations
and bad prognosis. Two studies, on 353 and 165 patients, found an
association between p53-Abs and short survival (64
, 66)
,
whereas one study (82 patients) did not find any association
(67)
, and another study (50 patients) found an association
with good survival (68)
. In gastric cancer, three of four
studies found an association between p53-Abs and poorly differentiated
tumors and short survival (69, 70, 71)
. In colon cancer, two
of three studies also found an association between p53-Abs and short
survival (72, 73, 74)
. In lung cancer, as for p53 mutations,
controversies exist concerning the clinical value of p53-Abs (Table 1)
.
In NSCLC, p53-Abs seem to be associated with poor survival,
especially in squamous cell carcinoma (75, 76, 77)
,
whereas in SCLC, the studies are very divergent (78
, 79) . In oral cancer, two studies have also demonstrated an
association between p53-Abs and short survival (80
, 81)
.
Taken together, in all of the these studies, there is a trend toward an
association between p53-Abs and tumors with poor differentiation, a
feature already observed with p53 mutations. The value of p53-Abs in
terms of survival is promising, but additional studies are necessary
before this can be clearly established.
 |
p53 and Follow-Up of Patients during Therapy
|
|---|
Because p53 accumulation is the main trigger of this humoral
response, it was of interest to examine the behavior of these p53-Abs
during therapy to see whether there was a relationship between tumor
disappearance and a decrease in p53-Abs. Several studies have addressed
this question in various types of cancer (24
, 28
, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87)
.
Such studies can only be performed using a quantitative assay, but this
has not been taken into account in many reports. Using
immunoprecipitation and two different ELISA formats, Zalcman et
al. (83)
showed that there is a good
correlation between the specific evolution of the p53-Abs titer and the
response to therapy in patients with lung cancer. A similar situation
was described in colorectal (82)
and ovarian cancer
(24)
. In other studies, clinical data were not available.
In several patients, the disappearance of p53-Abs was very rapid,
nearly as rapid as the half-life of human IgG (83
, 88)
.
Several arguments demonstrate the specificity of p53-Abs variation
during therapy: (a) there is no variation in total serum
immunoglobulins; (b) there is no variation in the amount of
antibodies directed toward other antigens; and (c) a
decrease of p53-Abs can occur in patients who have been treated by
surgery without any chemo- or radiotherapy. All of these observations
indicate that constant stimulation of the immune system is necessary to
maintain a high level of p53-Abs. Removing the tumor would prevent such
stimulation.
In breast cancer, it is possible to detect the reappearance of p53-Abs
2 years after initial therapy. This increase in p53-Abs has been
detected 3 months before the detection of a relapse (5)
.
Thus, in such tumor types, p53-Abs could be a useful tool for
controlling the response to therapy and for monitoring certain early
relapses before they are clinically detectable. As indicated above,
several studies have demonstrated that sera that score negative at the
time of diagnosis never turn positive during follow-up (82
, 83
, 86)
.
 |
p53 Antibodies and Populations at High Risk of Cancer
|
|---|
As demonstrated in the previous section, p53 accumulation is the
major component in the appearance of these p53-Abs. These antibodies
are usually IgG indicating a secondary response after a prolonged
immunization before the diagnosis of the disease (25)
. All
of the studies described up until now used sera taken at the time of
diagnosis before any treatment. Thus, it is reasonable to presume that
such p53-Abs could be used as an early indicator of p53 mutations in
tumors in which such alterations occur early during tumoral progression
(Table 3)
. One good model for testing this hypothesis is that of lung cancer and
heavy smokers. It is well established that p53 accumulation is an early
event in lung cancer and that such cancer is strongly associated with
tobacco smoking. Indeed, in 1994, p53-Abs were found in two heavy
smoker who were negative for any detectable lung cancer
(48)
. One of the patients could not be followed but died 8
months later from a rapidly growing lung tumor. The second
patient, PT37, was placed under surveillance, with regular assay for
p53-Abs and thoracic X-rays. Two years later, lung cancer was detected
in this patient before any clinical manifestations of the disease
(88)
. The patient showed good response to therapy that
paralleled the total disappearance of p53-Abs (83
, 88)
.
Since 1996, this patient has been tumor-free, and a recent check-up
indicated that neither the tumor nor p53-Abs had reappeared. To our
knowledge, this is the only prospective study that addressed the
importance of p53-Abs in individuals at high risk for cancer, and that
used such assays for clinical management of the patient. Since that
work, several studies have demonstrated that p53-Abs can be found in
the sera of high-risk individuals.
Angiosarcoma of the liver is an extremely rare cancer in humans; it is
found in individuals, including workers in several types of industries,
who have been exposed to several carcinogens such as vinyl chloride.
p53-Abs were detected in the sera of individuals several years before
the diagnosis of the tumors (Table 3
; Ref. 42
). This work
is of importance because it is known that p53 mutations are frequent in
individuals exposed to various carcinogens, and such mutations usually
occur early in the transforming process (89)
. Therefore,
this assay could be useful for early identification of cancer in
individuals occupationally exposed to carcinogens. Similarly, p53-Abs
have been detected in the sera of patients with chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease and in heavy smokers (Table 3
; Ref.
90
).
There exist certain clinical situations in which nonmalignant lesions
can predate their progression toward cancer. This is the case in
Barretts esophagus. The histopathological sequence for (Barretts)
metaplasia, which developsas a consequence of chronic refluxto
dysplasia and then to carcinoma is well established for these tumors.
In Barretts esophagus, a variety of molecular changes have been
characterized and correlated with tumor initiation and progression.
Mutations and accumulation of p53 are found mainly in the transition
from low- to high-grade dysplasia and are associated with an increased
risk of cancer. The finding of p53-Abs in patients with Barretts
esophagus may be promising if confirmed in a larger population because
it may predate clinical diagnosis of esophageal ADC
(91)
. A similar situation occurs in individuals with
premalignant oral lesions (leukoplakia) due to tobacco or betel nut
chewing. Such individuals are at high risk of developing oral cancer
(510%). p53-Abs have been found at high frequency in patients with
premalignant and malignant lesions, which suggests that such antibodies
could be used for early detection of cancer (Table 3
;
Ref.92
). Unfortunately, no follow-up has been performed on
these patients. Due to the high frequency of this type of cancer in
countries such as India or Pakistan, this kind of diagnosis could be of
importance. The recent discovery that p53-Abs can be found in saliva
indicates that easy screening could be organized to verify the value of
these antibodies (27)
.
 |
p53 Protein in Sera
|
|---|
This question continues to be a subject of debate with highly
divergent results (Table 4
; Refs. 55
, 56
, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98
). It should be pointed out that most
assays use a commercial ELISA kit that was developed for the detection
of p53 protein in cell or tumor extracts but that has not been fully
verified on serum samples. Sera have always been tested undiluted,
which can lead to high background and false-positives. Indeed, in
carefully controlled experiments, Levesque et al.
(55)
demonstrated that some false-positive sera were
caused either by the presence of human antibodies with broad
antispecies specificities that can cross-react with some antibodies
used in the assay or by other nonspecific reactants that interfere with
the assay.
Due to the lack of reliability of the various assays used, serum p53
protein should not be considered as valid as long as the protein has
not been formally identified in sera using a reliable assay.
 |
Antibodies toward Other Oncogenes and Tumor Suppressor Genes
|
|---|
Only a few published studies have addressed this question.
Antibodies to ras (99)
, c-myb (100)
, L-myc
(101)
, c-myc (102)
, mdm2 (103)
or HER2-neu (104
, 105)
have been detected in sera of
patients with various types of cancers.
The presence of antibodies to HER-2/neu were detected in 12 (11%) of
107 breast cancer patients versus none (0%) of 200 normal
controls (104)
. The presence of antibodies to HER-2/neu
was also correlated with the accumulation of HER-2/neu protein in the
patients primary tumor. Such accumulation of HER-2/neu protein is
well known to be associated with a poor prognosis. No information
concerning the association of such antibodies with clinical data has
been published thus far.
The paucity of these data compared with p53 suggests that p53
immunogenicity is a rather specific situation related to the striking
immunogenicity of the p53 protein.
This field is advancing, especially with the use of new methodology,
such as SEREX, that enables identification of specific antibodies
associated with gene overexpression in tumors (106
, 107)
.
Such methodology can shed light on new tumor antigens, which could lead
to the discovery of new cancer genes, repeating the history of the p53
with the identification of the protein prior to cloning the gene.
 |
p53 Antibodies: Future Directions
|
|---|
Although several authors have questioned the specificity of
p53-Abs, a review of the literature (Tables 1
and 2)
clearly
demonstrates the specificity of this serological analysis because such
antibodies are truly rare in the normal population. It is possible to
estimate that the specificity of this assay attains 95%. Such
specificity is supported by our knowledge of p53 that accumulates
specifically in the nucleus of tumor cells after gene mutation. Among
the various TAAs that have been analyzed over the years, the production
of p53-Abs is surely the best studied and most clearly explains humoral
response. One of the disadvantages of this assay is its lack of
sensitivity inasmuch as only 2040% of patients with p53 mutations
will develop p53-Abs. This lack of sensitivity totally precludes the
use of the assay to evaluate p53 alteration in human tumor.
Nevertheless, if we estimate that there are 8 million patients with
various types of cancer throughout the world, and 50% of them have a
mutation in their p53 gene, then we can deduce that about 1
million of these patients have p53-Abs.
There exist several situations in which p53-Abs could have clinical
utility. The first is in the monitoring of sera during therapy. Only
prospective studies on various types of cancer in which relapses occur
several months or years after treatment will enable us to validate this
assay. The use of standardized assays that have been validated for
quantitative analysis should help in such studies.
The second situation concerns p53-Abs in high-risk individuals. One of
the challenges of the next millennium is the early detection of tumors
using highly sensitive assays with gene probes specific for tumor
genetic alterations (108)
. Such approaches are still under
development and remain costly. I do believe that there is still room
for serological assays of tumors markers such as those described in the
present review. In developing countries, there is an increased burden
of tumors due to carcinogen exposure. This is the result of an increase
in cigarette consumption, higher pollution caused by political laxism,
uncontrolled industrial development, and the absence of regulation in
waste evacuation. It is possible that p53 mutations in cancer related
to such exposure are high (109)
. The use of a low-cost
assay for the detection of p53-Abs could be of public health benefit in
such countries.
Over the past 10 years, a tremendous amount of work has been performed
on p53. Such an effort, both in academic and private
laboratories has never been made for any other single gene thus far.
This work has led to the development of numerous clinical studies
including gene therapy protocols, with the aim of achieving more
efficient cure of the disease.
Finally, let me dedicate this review to Patient PT37 (88)
.
I think that this patient is the first to have benefited from
significant improvement, and, indeed, whose very life has been saved,
thanks to the knowledge we have gained about p53, particularly from the
TAA studies published 20 years ago (7)
.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
I am grateful to L. J. Old for reading the manuscript.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by Ligue Nationale contre le Cancer
(Comité de Paris), the Association pour la Recherche contre le
Cancer (ARC), the Mutuelle Générale de lÉducation
Nationale (MGEN), Direction de la Recherche Clinique (DRC) de
lAssistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris Contract Grant
AOA94084. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Laboratoire de génotoxicologie des tumeurs,
Institut Curie, 26 rue dUlm, 75248 Paris, France. Phone:
33-1-44-32-41-60; Fax: 33-1-44-32-42-32; E-mail: thierry.soussi{at}curie.fr 
3 The abbreviations used are:
p53-Ab, p53 antibody; TAA, tumor-associated antigen; LSH,
loop-sheet-helix (motif); SCLC, small cell lung cancer; NSCLC,
non-SCLC; ADC, adenocarcinoma. 
4 M. Tavassoli and T. Soussi. Expression of p53 in
oral squamous cell carcinoma is associated with the presence of p53
autoantibodies in sera and saliva, manuscript in preparation. 
5 Y. Legros and T. Soussi, unpublished
observation; D. Lane, personal communication. 
6 O. Tominaga, K. Unzal, and T. Soussi. p73
antibodies are found in the sera of patients with various types of
cancer, manuscript in preparation. 
Received 10/25/99.
Accepted 2/16/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Melero J. A., Stitt D. T., Mangel W. F., Carroll R. B. Identification of new polypeptide species (4855K) immunoprecipitable by antiserum to purified large T antigen and present in simian virus 40-infected and transformed cells. J. Virol., 93: 466-480, 1979.
-
Linzer D. I. H., Levine A. J. Characterization of a 54K dalton cellular SV40 tumor antigen present in SV40-transformed cells and uninfected embryonal carcinoma cells. Cell, 17: 43-52, 1979.[Medline]
-
Linzer D. I., Maltzman W., Levine A. J. The SV40 A gene product is required for the production of a 54,000 MW cellular tumor antigen. Virology, 98: 308-318, 1979.[Medline]
-
Lane D. P., Crawford L. V. T antigen is bound to a host protein in SV40-transformed cells. Nature (Lond.), 278: 261-263, 1979.[Medline]
-
Kress M., May E., Cassingena R., May P. Simian Virus 40-transformed cells express new species of proteins precipitable by anti-simian virus 40 serum. J. Virol., 31: 472-483, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rotter V., Witte O. N., Coffman R., Baltimore D. Abelson murine leukemia virus-induced tumors elicit antibodies against a host cell protein, p50. J. Virol., 36: 547-555, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
De Leo A. B., Jay G., Appella E., Dubois G. C., Law L. W., Old L. J. Detection of a transformation-related antigen in chemically induced sarcomas and other transformed cells of the mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 76: 2420-2424, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Crawford L. V., Pim D. C., Bulbrook R. D. Detection of antibodies against the cellular protein p53 in sera from patients with breast cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 30: 403-408, 1982.[Medline]
-
Caron de Fromentel C., May-Levin F., Mouriesse H., Lemerle J., Chandrasekaran K., May P. Presence of circulating antibodies against cellular protein p53 in a notable proportion of children with B-cell lymphoma. Int. J. Cancer, 39: 185-189, 1987.[Medline]
-
Caron de Fromentel C., Soussi T. TP53 tumor suppressor gene: a model for investigating human mutagenesis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 4: 1-15, 1992.[Medline]
-
Crawford L. The 53,000-dalton cellular protein and its role in transformation. Int. Rev. Exp. Pathol., 25: 1-50, 1983.[Medline]
-
Levine A. J. p53, the cellular gatekeeper for growth and division. Cell, 88: 323-331, 1997.[Medline]
-
Oren M., Rotter V. Introduction: p53the first twenty years. Cell. Mol. Life Sci., 55: 9-11, 1999.[Medline]
-
Giaccia A. J., Kastan M. B. The complexity of p53 modulation: emerging patterns from divergent signals. Genes Dev., 12: 2973-2983, 1998.[Free Full Text]
-
Prives C. Signaling to p53: breaking the MDM2-p53 circuit. Cell, 95: 5-8, 1998.[Medline]
-
Benchimol S., Pim D., Crawford L. Radioimmunoassay of the cellular protein p53 in mouse and human cell lines. EMBO J., 1: 1055-1062, 1982.[Medline]
-
Kastan M. B., Onyekwere O., Sidransky D., Vogelstein B., Craig R. W. Participation of p53 protein in the cellular response to DNA damage. Cancer Res., 51: 6304-6311, 1991.[Medline]
-
Yonish-Rouach E., Resnitzky D., Lotem J., Sachs L., Kimchi A., Oren M. Wild-type p53 induces apoptosis of myeloid leukaemic cells that is inhibited by interleukin-6. Nature (Lond.), 352: 345-347, 1991.[Medline]
-
Soussi T., Legros Y., Lubin R., Ory K., Schlichtholz B. Multifactorial analysis of p53 alteration in human cancera review. Int. J. Cancer, 57: 1-9, 1994.[Medline]
-
Greenblatt M. S., Bennett W. P., Hollstein M., Harris C. C. Mutations in the p53 tumor suppressor gene: clues to cancer etiology and molecular pathogenesis. Cancer Res., 54: 4855-4878, 1994.[Free Full Text]
-
Béroud C., Soussi T. p53 gene mutation: software and database. Nucleic Acids Res., 26: 200-204, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Casey G., Lopez M. E., Ramos J. C., Plummer S. J., Arboleda M. J., Shaughnessy M., Karlan B., Slamon D. J. DNA sequence analysis of exons 2 through 11 and immunohistochemical staining are required to detect all known p53 alterations in human malignancies. Oncogene, 13: 1971-1981, 1996.[Medline]
-
Dowell S. P., Wilson P. O. G., Derias N. W., Lane D. P., Hall P. A. Clinical utility of the immunocytochemical detection of p53 protein in cytological specimens. Cancer Res., 54: 2914-2918, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Angelopoulou K., Diamandis E. P., Sutherland D. J. A., Kellen J. A., Bunting P. S. Prevalence of serum antibodies against the p53 tumor suppressor gene protein in various cancers. Int. J. Cancer, 58: 480-487, 1994.[Medline]
-
Lubin R., Schlichtholz B., Teillaud J. L., Garay E., Bussel A., Wild C., Soussi T. p53 antibodies in patients with various types of cancer: assay, identification and characterization. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 1463-1469, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Vennegoor C., Nijman H. W., Drijfhout J. W., Vernie L., Verstraeten R. A., vonMensdorffPouilly S., Hilgers J., Verheijen R. H. M., Kast W. M., Melief C. J. M., Kenemans P. Autoantibodies to p53 in ovarian cancer patients and healthy women: a comparison between whole p53 protein and 18-mer peptides for screening purposes. Cancer Lett., 116: 93-101, 1997.[Medline]
-
Tavassoli M., Brunel N., Maher R., Johnson N. W., Soussi T. p53 antibodies in the saliva of patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity. Int. J. Cancer, 78: 390-391, 1998.[Medline]
-
Angelopoulou K., Diamandis E. P. Detection of the TP53 tumour suppressor gene product and p53 auto-antibodies in the ascites of women with ovarian cancer. Eur. J. Cancer, 33: 115-121, 1997.
-
Munker R., Stotzer O., Darsow M., Classen S., Lebeau A., Wilmanns W. Autoantibodies against p53 are not increased in human ascites and pleural effusions. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 42: 200-201, 1996.[Medline]
-
Puisieux A., Galvin K., Troalen F., Bressac B., Marcais C., Galun E., Ponchel F., Yakicier C., Ji J. W., Ozturk M. Retinoblastoma and p53 tumor suppressor genes in human hepatoma cell lines. FASEB J., 7: 1407-1413, 1993.[Abstract]
-
Fleischhacker M., Strohmeyer T., Imai Y., Slamon D. J., Koeffler H. P. Mutations of the p53 gene are not detectable in human testicular tumors. Mod. Pathol., 7: 435-439, 1994.[Medline]
-
Peng H. Q., Hogg D., Malkin D., Bailey D., Gallie B. L., Bulbul M., Jewett M., Buchanan J., Goss P. E. Mutations of the p53 gene do not occur in testis cancer. Cancer Res., 53: 3574-3578, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lubbe J., Reichel M., Burg G., Kleihues P. Absence of p53 gene mutations in cutaneous melanoma. J. Investig. Dermatol., 102: 819-821, 1994.[Medline]
-
Luca M., Lenzi R., Lee-Jackson D., Gutman M., Fidler I. J., Bar-Eli M. p53 mutations are infrequent and do not correlate with the metastatic potential of human melanoma cells. Int. J. Oncol., 3: 19-22, 1993.
-
Rainov N. G., Dobberstein K. U., Fittkau M., Bahn H., Holzausen H. J., Gantchev L., Burkert W. Absence of p53 antibodies in sera from glioma patients. Clin. Cancer Res., 1: 775-781, 1995.[Abstract]
-
Weller M., Bornemann A., Stander M., Schabet M., Dichgans J., Meyermann R. Humoral immune response to p53 in malignant glioma. J. Neurol., 245: 169-172, 1998.[Medline]
-
Ohgaki H., Eibl R. H., Schwab M., Reichel M. B., Mariani L., Gehring M., Petersen I., Holl T., Wiestler O. D., Kleihues P. Mutations of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in neoplasms of the human nervous system. Mol. Carcinog., 8: 74-80, 1993.[Medline]
-
Winter S. F., Minna J. D., Johnson B. E., Takahashi T., Gazdar A. F., Carbone D. P. Development of antibodies against p53 in lung cancer patients appears to be dependent on the type of p53 mutation. Cancer Res., 52: 4168-4174, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Davidoff A. M., Iglehart J. D., Marks J. R. Immune response to p53 is dependent upon p53/HSP70 complexes in breast cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 3439-3442, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kaur J., Srivastava A., Ralhan R. Serum p53 antibodies in patients with oral lesions: Correlation with p53/HSP70 complexes. Int. J. Cancer, 74: 609-613, 1997.[Medline]
-
Winter S. F., Sekido Y., Minna J. D., Mcintire D., Johnson B. E., Gazdar A. F., Carbone D. P. Antibodies against autologous tumor cell proteins in patients with small-cell lung cancerassociation with improved survival. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 85: 2012-2018, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Trivers G. E., Cawley H. L., Debenedetti V. M. G., Hollstein M., Marion M. J., Bennett W. P., Hoover M. L., Prives C. C., Tamburro C. C., Harris C. C. Anti-p53 antibodies in sera of workers occupationally exposed to vinyl chloride. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 87: 1400-1407, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hammel P., LeroyViard K., Chaumette M. T., Villaudy J., Falzone M. C., Rouillard D., Hamelin R., Boissier B., Remvikos Y. Correlations between p53-protein accumulation, serum antibodies and gene mutation in colorectal cancer. Int. J. Cancer, 81: 712-718, 1999.[Medline]
-
von Brevern M. C., Hollstein M. C., Cawley H. M., De Benedetti V. M. G., Bennett W. P., Liang L., He A. G., Zhu S. M., Tursz T., Janin N., Trivers G. E. Circulating anti-p53 antibodies in esophageal cancer patients are found predominantly in individuals with p53 core domain mutations in their tumors. Cancer Res., 56: 4917-4921, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schlichtholz B., Legros Y., Gillet D., Gaillard C., Marty M., Lane D., Calvo F., Soussi T. The immune response to p53 in breast cancer patients is directed against immunodominant epitopes unrelated to the mutational hot spot. Cancer Res., 52: 6380-6384, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Labrecque S., Naor N., Thomson D., Matlashewski G. Analysis of the anti-p53 antibody response in cancer patients. Cancer Res., 53: 3468-3471, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Lubin R., Schlichtholz B., Bengoufa D., Zalcman G., Tredaniel J., Hirsch A., Caron de Fromentel C., Preudhomme C., Fenaux P., Fournier G., Mangin P., Laurent-Puig P., Pelletier G., Schlumberger M., Desgrandchamps F., Leduc A., Peyrat J. P., Janin N., Bressac B., Soussi T. Analysis of p53 antibodies in patients with various cancers define B-Cell epitopes of human p53: distribution on primary structure and exposure on protein surface. Cancer Res., 53: 5872-5876, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schlichtholz B., Tredaniel J., Lubin R., Zalcman G., Hirsch A., Soussi T. Analyses of p53 antibodies in sera of patients with lung carcinoma define immunodominant regions in the p53 protein. Br. J. Cancer, 69: 809-816, 1994.[Medline]
-
Legros Y., Lafon C., Soussi T. Linear antigenic sites defined by the B-cell response to human p53 are localized predominantly in the amino- and carboxy-termini of the protein. Oncogene, 9: 2071-2076, 1994.[Medline]
-
Hardy-Bessard A. C., Garay E., Lacronique V., Legros Y., Demarquay C., Houque A., Portefaix J. M., Granier C., Soussi T. Regulation of the specific DNA binding activity of Xenopus laevis p53: evidence for conserved regulation through the carboxy-terminus of the protein. Oncogene, 16: 883-890, 1998.[Medline]
-
Vojtesek B., Bartek J., Midgley C. A., Lane D. P. An immunochemical analysis of the human nuclear phosphoprotein-p53: new monoclonal antibodies and epitope mapping using recombinant-p53. J. Immunol. Methods, 151: 237-244, 1992.[Medline]
-
Bartek J., Bartkova J., Lukas J., Staskova Z., Vojtesek B., Lane D. P. Immunohistochemical analysis of the p53 oncoprotein on paraffin sections using a series of novel monoclonal antibodies. J. Pathol., 169: 27-34, 1993.[Medline]
-
Legros Y., Meyer A., Ory K., Soussi T. Mutations in p53 produce a common conformational effect that can be detected with a panel of monoclonal antibodies directed toward the central part of the p53 protein. Oncogene, 9: 3689-3694, 1994.[Medline]
-
Vojtesek B., Dolezalova H., Lauerova L., Svitakova M., Havlis P., Kovarik J., Midgley C. A., Lane D. P. Conformational changes in p53 analysed using new antibodies to the core DNA binding domain of the protein. Oncogene, 10: 389-393, 1995.[Medline]
-
Levesque M. A., Dcosta M., Diamandis E. P. p53 protein is absent from the serum of patients with lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 74: 1434-1440, 1996.[Medline]
-
Hassapoglidou S., Diamandis E. P., Sutherland D. J. A. Quantification of p53 protein in tumor cell lines, breast tissue extracts and serum with time-resolved immunofluorometry. Oncogene, 8: 1501-1509, 1993.[Medline]
-
Cho Y. J., Gorina S., Jeffrey P. D., Pavletich N. P. Crystal structure of a p53 tumor suppressor DNA complex: understanding tumorigenic mutations. Science (Washington DC), 265: 346-355, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Portefaix, J. M., Thébault, S., Bourgain-Guglielmetti, F., Del Rio, M., Granier, M., Mani, J. C., Teulon-Navaro, I., Nicolas, M., Soussi, T., and Pau, B. Critical residues of epitopes recognized by several anti-p53 monoclonal antibodies correspond to key residues of p53 involved in interaction with the mdm2 protein. J. Immunol. Methods, in press, 2000.
-
Kaghad M., Bonnet H., Yang A., Creancier L., Biscan J. C., Valent A., Minty A., Chalon P., Lelias J. M., Dumont X., Ferrara P., McKeon F., Caput D. Monoallelically expressed gene related to p53 at 1p36, a region frequently deleted in neuroblastoma and other human cancers. Cell, 90: 809-819, 1997.[Medline]
-
Osada M., Ohba M., Kawahara C., Ishioka C., Kanamaru R., Katoh I., Ikawa Y., Nimura Y., Nakagawara A., Obinata M., Ikawa S. Cloning and functional analysis of human p51, which structurally and functionally resembles p53. Nat. Med., 4: 839-843, 1998.[Medline]
-
Trink B., Okami K., Wu L., Sriuranpong V., Jen J., Sidransky D. A new human p53 homologue. Nat. Med., 4: 747-748, 1998.[Medline]
-
Schmale H., Bamberger C. A novel protein with strong homology to the tumor suppressor p53. Oncogene, 15: 1363-1367, 1997.[Medline]
-
Roth J., Dittmer D., Rea D., Tartaglia J., Paoletti E., Levine A. J. p53 as a target for cancer vaccines: recombinant canarypox virus vectors expressing p53 protect mice against lethal tumor cell challenge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 4781-4786, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Peyrat J. P., Bonneterre J., Lubin R., Vanlemmens L., Fournier J., Soussi T. Prognostic significance of circulating p53 antibodies in patients undergoing surgery for locoregional breast cancer. Lancet, 345: 621-622, 1995.[Medline]
-
Mudenda B., Green J. A., Green B., Jenkins J. R., Robertson L., Tarunina M., Leinster S. J. The relationship between serum p53 autoantibodies and characteristics of human breast cancer. Br. J. Cancer, 69: 1115-1119, 1994.[Medline]
-
Lenner P., Wiklund F., Emdin S. O., Arnerlov C., Eklund C., Hallmans G., Zentgraf H., Dillner J. Serum antibodies against p53 in relation to cancer risk and prognosis in breast cancer: a population-based epidemiological study. Br. J. Cancer, 79: 927-932, 1999.[Medline]
-
Will