
[Cancer Research 60, 1942-1948, April 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research
Molecular Biology and Genetics |
VHL Alterations in Human Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Association with Advanced Tumor Stage and a Novel Hot Spot Mutation1
Hiltrud Brauch2,
Gregor Weirich,
Jürgen Brieger,
Damjan Glava
,
Heinz Rödl,
Mariola Eichinger,
Matthias Feurer,
Eberhardt Weidt,
Chutintorn Puranakanitstha,
Christine Neuhaus,
Sigmund Pomer,
Walburgis Brenner,
Peter Schirmacher,
Stephan Störkel,
Michael Rotter,
Andrej Ma
era,
Nadja Gugeler and
Hans-Joachim Decker
Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany [H. B., N. G.]; Laboratory of Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, TUM, 81675 Munich, Germany [G. W., H. R., M. E., M. F., M. R.]; Laboratory of Immunobiology, National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research and Development Center, Frederick, Maryland 21702 [G. W.]; Hematology, Third Department of Medicine, University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany [J. B., E. W., C. P., C. N., H-J. D.]; Laboratory of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Pathology, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia [D. G., A. M.]; Department of Urology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany [S. P.]; Department of Urology [W. B.] and Institute of Pathology [P. S.], University of Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany; Institute of Pathology, University of Witten-Herdecke, 42283 Wuppertal, Germany [S. S.]; and Department of Molecular Genetics, Bioscientia Institute, 55218 Ingelheim, Germany [H-J. D.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
To elucidate the role of somatic alterations for renal cancer etiology
and prognosis, we analyzed 227 sporadic renal epithelial tumors for
mutations and hypermethylations in the von Hippel-Lindau tumor
suppressor gene VHL. Tumors were classified according to
the recommendations of the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC)
and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Somatic
VHL mutations were identified by PCR, single-strand
conformation polymorphism analysis, and sequencing, and
hypermethylations were identified by restriction enzyme digestion and
Southern blotting. Frequencies of VHL alterations were
established, and an association with tumor type or tumor type and tumor
stage was evaluated. VHL mutations and hypermethylations
were identified in 45% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas (CCRCCs)
and occasionally (3 of 28) in papillary (chromophilic) renal cell
carcinomas (RCCs). Lack of VHL mutations and
hypermethylations in chromophobe RCCs and oncocytomas was statistically
significant (P = 0.0001 and
P = 0.0004, respectively). RCCs carrying
VHL alterations showed, in nine cases (12%), mutations
at a hot spot involving a thymine repeat (ATT.TTT) in exon 2. Tumor
staging was critical to the VHL
mutation/hypermethylation detection rate in CCRCCs shown by separate
evaluation of patients from medical centers in Munich, Heidelberg, and
Mainz. The spectrum of pT1, pT2, and
pT3 CCRCCs and the VHL
mutation/hypermethylation detection rate varied among these three
groups. Altogether, VHL alterations were significantly
associated with pT3 CCRCCs (P = 0.009). This is the first evidence of frequent somatic
VHL mutations at a particular site within exon 2 and an
association of VHL mutations/hypermethylations with a
standard prognostic factor.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
CCRCC3
is the most common malignant neoplasm of the kidney and belongs to the
few human tumors known to evolve from mutations of a specific gene, the
VHL tumor suppressor gene (1)
. Originally,
VHL was identified in families with VHL disease, a rare
hereditary multitumor syndrome (1)
. Molecular studies have
shown that VHL germ-line mutations are associated with
hereditary CCRCCs in VHL disease (2)
, and
moreover, that somatic VHL mutations account for the
majority of the more common sporadic CCRCCs (3)
. Together
with the loss of the homologous chromosome 3p allele (3p LOH),
VHL mutations are rate-limiting events in renal
tumorigenesis (3
, 4)
. Somatic VHL mutations
were identified in 3357% of CCRCCs from the United States, Europe,
and Japan (3
, 5, 6, 7, 8)
, and in 20% of another subset of
CCRCCs, the VHL gene was methylated (9)
.
Current knowledge suggests that mutations and transcriptional silencing
(3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
of VHL in renal epithelial cells cause
loss or modulation of cellular functions operated by the wild-type
VHL protein (pVHL). The molecular mechanisms by which pVHL
modulates the expression of target genes leading to CCRCCs are not well
understood. Accumulated evidence suggests that pVHL is involved in
targeted protein degradation and control of angiogenesis
(10, 11, 12, 13)
, and there is evidence that pVHL is implicated in
regulation of extracellular pH (14)
, formation of
extracellular matrix (15)
, and cell cycle control
(10)
.
Molecular analyses revealed a broad spectrum of somatic VHL
defects. Any nucleotide of the coding sequence downstream of a
NotI restriction site may be affected by substitutions,
deletions, or insertions (3
, 5, 6, 7, 8)
, and other changes may
involve methylation (9)
. Although most of these
alterations seem distributed at random, some occur more frequently. For
example, somatic mutations in RCCs cluster within VHL exon 2
(3)
. Also, RCCs of patients with defined occupational
exposure to a human carcinogen, i.e., trichloroethylene,
show frequent cytosine to thymine (C
T) transitions and/or a
VHL hot spot mutation in exon 1 (16)
. With the
exception of patients with known environmental exposure for which
nonrandom VHL mutations may be linked to a specific
carcinogen, the origin of frequent mutations at other sites remains
elusive.
Nonrandom distribution of somatic VHL mutations may not only
originate endogenously but also from exposure to exogenous carcinogens,
which is supported by the observation of regional variations in RCC
incidence. For example, for yet unknown reasons, the Bas Rhin region of
France has one of the highest incidences of RCC in the world
(17)
. Furthermore, on the molecular level, the findings of
a wide spectrum of somatic VHL mutation frequencies in
patients from the United States, Europe, and Japan are unexplained. We
reasoned that comprehensive molecular and histopathological data
analyses of patients from potentially high-risk areas may provide
further clues to the etiology of RCCs and the meaning of somatic
VHL alterations.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Renal Tissue and Histopathological Classification.
Normal and tumor tissue of 227 patients with renal epithelial tumors
were obtained from three medical centers in Germany. Tumors were
designated according to the medical center of origin, i.e.,
MRI refers to the Institute of Pathology, Technical University
Munich-Klinikum rechts der Isar, KT and KTCL to the University Hospital
and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, and MZ to the University
Hospital Mainz. Patients had no history of hereditary VHL disease.
Tissue was stored in liquid nitrogen until DNA isolation. Peripheral
blood lymphocytes served as a source of normal DNA from patients
without available normal renal tissue. Histopathological evaluation
(Table 1)
and grading were according to Thoenes et al.
(18)
and in concordance with the recently established
classification by the UICC and the AJCC (19)
. Readings
were independently confirmed by repeated microscopic evaluation by
specifically trained pathologists of participating institutes (G. W.,
M. R., P. S., and S. S). Tumor-Node-Metastasis stages were
established according to the UICC (20)
. Detailed
information on tumors without VHL alterations are available
upon request. Informed consent was given by all patients.
Investigations were performed retrospectively and approved by a human
investigations committee.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Renal epithelial tumors screened for VHL alterations and an association
between pathological tumor staging and the presence of VHL alterations
|
|
DNA Isolation and Molecular Analysis.
DNA was isolated according to standard procedures. For the
detection of nucleotide substitutions, deletions and insertions at
VHL PCR-based methods including SSCP and sequencing were
conducted in two participating laboratories. Samples with SSCP
bandshifts were subjected to sequencing analysis to confirm mutations.
Samples without SSCP bandshifts were sequenced at random. Both samples
with and without somatic VHL mutations were exchanged
between the two laboratories and repeatedly analyzed at random in a
blinded fashion. PCR oligonucleotides were FR III
(5'-ACTCGGGAGCGCGCACGCA-3') and R 30 (5'-GAGGGCTCGCGCGAGTTCAC-3'-), VHL
28 and VHL 22 (21)
, MA2A and 101 (21)
, I5 and
I3 (21)
, YH1A and 6b (21)
, and K 55 and K56
(22)
. The analysis of DNA hypermethylation was
according to Herman et al. (9)
. Large deletions
of VHL were not analyzed because this would require
quantitative Southern blotting (23)
. This method cannot be
used for the analysis of somatic VHL mutations because of
variable amounts of contaminating lymphocytes in tumor tissues.
LOH was determined by comparison of normal and tumor DNA at
microsatellite loci D3S1038, D3S1530, and
D3S1435 according to published procedures (24)
.
For comprehensive evaluation, results from LOH studies from Brauch
et al. (25)
were included.
Statistical Analysis.
An association between presence of somatic VHL mutations and
the CCRCC phenotype compared with lack of somatic VHL
mutations in chromophobe RCCs or oncocytomas was calculated according
to Fishers exact test (26)
. Two-sided Ps were
used and were considered statistically significant when <0.05. An
association between the presence of a somatic VHL mutation
and tumor staging (pT) was calculated by contingency table analysis
with
2 testing (likelihood ratio). All
statistical computations were performed with the software SPSS for
Windows Rel. 9.0.1 (SSPS, Inc.).
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
All RCCs with somatic VHL mutations and
hypermethylations are listed in Table 2
. Carcinomas are consecutively arranged according to affected
nucleotides from the 5' to the 3' direction, respectively. Data include
pathological characteristics of 77 RCCs, their VHL
alterations, i.e., 64 mutations and 13 hypermethylations, as
well as 3p LOH of 56 of these RCCs, respectively (Table 2)
.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Pathological characteristics of CCRCCs and papillary (chromophilic)
RCCs with VHL mutations, hypermethylations, and 3p LOH
|
|
VHL Mutations and Hypermethylations in Renal Tumors.
VHL alterations, i.e., mutations and
hypermethylations, affected 68 of 151 (45%) CCRCCs, 4 of 13 (31%)
RCCs not further classified, a low differentiated and a
dedifferentiated RCC, as well as 3 of 28 (11%) papillary
(chromophilic) RCCs (Table 3)
. All patients were negative for germ-line mutations. VHL
alterations were absent in chromophobe RCCs and renal oncocytomas
(Table 3)
. Lack of VHL alterations in chromophobe RCCs (0 of
17) compared with the high frequency of VHL alterations in
CCRCCs (68 of 151; 45%) was statistically significant
(P = 0.0001). Lack of VHL
alterations in renal oncocytoma (0 of 15) was also statistically
significant when compared with CCRCCs (P = 0.0004).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3 VHL alterations in renal epithelial tumors: tumors with mutations and
hypermethylations, tumors with a hot spot mutation, and tumors with
both mutation/hypermethylation and 3p LOH
|
|
VHL Mutation Types and Hypermethylation.
Seventy-seven RCCs shared 60 different mutations and epigenetic
changes. In particular, 64 carcinomas had mutations (83%), and 13 had
hypermethylations (17%). Mutations included 32 frameshift
mutations (50%), 18 missense mutations (28%), 3 in-frame deletions or
insertions (5%), 4 nonsense mutations (6%), 6 splice site mutations
(9%), and 1 change at the 3' untranslated region. Mutations of the
coding sequence were located in exon 1 in 17 cases (27%), in exon 2 in
27 cases (42%), and in exon 3 in 13 cases (20%). An overview of the
frequencies and distribution of VHL alterations is given in
Fig. 1
.

View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. Somatic mutations and hypermethylations of the
VHL gene. Summary of data from patients with RCCs from
three German medical centers (Munich, Heidelberg, and Mainz). The
codons of the VHL gene are shown along the X
axis. Exon 1 of the VHL gene encodes amino acids
1114, exon 2 encodes amino acids 114155, and exon 3 encodes amino
acids 155213. The numbers of mutations or hypermethylations at a
particular codon are shown on the Y axis.
VHL aberrations identified in RCCs are drawn as
perpendicular bars. Most mutations were identified only
once, as indicated by the shortest length bar. The
methylation-sensitive codon 58 was affected by hypermethylation and a
point mutation in 14 patients (n = 14).
Codons 147 of 148 were affected in RCCs of nine patients
(n = 9). Other mutations that were
identified more than once affected codons 98, 114, 115, 122, 126, 143,
151, 156, 158, and 186.
|
|
LOH.
3p LOH was identified in 115 CCRCCs (93%) of 124 informative
cases (not shown). Also, 6 of 27 (22%) papillary (chromophilic) RCCs
and 5 of 11 (45%) chromophobe RCCs had 3p LOH (not shown). No LOH was
observed in renal oncocytomas (0 of 15). Both VHL
mutation/hypermethylation and 3p LOH were present in 56 of 77 (73%)
RCCs (Tables 2
and 3)
. This refers to 51 of 68 (75%) CCRCCs, 2 of 3
(66%) papillary (chromophilic) RCCs, 1 dedifferentiated, 1 low
differentiated, and 1 not further classified RCC, respectively (Table 3)
.
VHL Mutation Hot Spot.
Nine of 77 (12%) RCCs with VHL alterations had a nucleotide
change, insertion, or deletion at a thymine cluster (ATT.TTT) within
exon 2 encoding amino acids isoleucine and phenylalanine at positions
147 and 148 of pVHL (Table 3)
. Examples of deletion T and insertion T
are given in Fig. 2
, respectively. In all cases, the mutation was predicted to truncate
pVHL at codon 147 or 148.

View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Mutations in CCRCCs at a mutation hot spot sequence
(ATT.TTT) in VHL exon 2. Sequences of CCRCC KTCL 26A,
MRI 5, and MRI 31 are compared with the wild-type sequence
(wt) in forward (left) and reverse
(right) direction. The cell line KTCL 26A shows a
deletion T; the sequence is homozygous because of a loss of the
homozygous allele and absence of contaminating wild type. MRI 5, a
primary tumor, shows the heterozygous sequence pattern of a wild-type
allele and a mutated allele with a deletion T. Likewise MRI 31, a
primary tumor, shows the heterozygous sequence pattern of a wild-type
allele and a mutated allele with an insertion T.
|
|
Association between VHL Mutations/Hypermethylations
and Prognostic Factor pT in CCRCCs.
We tested for an association between the presence of somatic
VHL mutation/hypermethylation in CCRCCs and prognostic
factors, i.e., tumor stage (pT) and nuclear grading (G).
Information on tumor stage was available for 145 patients (Table 4)
. Four tumors (3%) were <2.5 cm in greatest extension
(pT1), 68 (47%) were >2.5 cm in greatest
extension limited to the kidney (pT2), and 73
(50%) invaded the adrenal gland or perinephric tissue or extended into
the major veins (pT3). VHL mutations
or hypermethylations were identified in 64 CCRCCs of all three stages
pT1, pT2, and
pT3 (Table 4)
. pT3 CCRCCs
carried VHL mutations or hypermethylations in 64%
(n = 41; Table 4
). This association was
statistically significant (P = 0.009). Also
three papillary (chromophilic) RCCs had VHL
hypermethylations, of which two were of advanced stage
(pT3) and one was of intermediate stage
(pT2; Table 2
). Whereas most CCRCCs carrying
VHL mutations/hypermethylations were of advanced tumor stage
(pT3), there was no significant association
between presence of VHL mutations/hypermethylations and
nuclear grades. Three papillary (chromophilic) RCCs with VHL
hypermethylations were highly malignant tumors (G3).
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 4 Association between VHL mutation/hypermethylation and tumor stage (pT)
in CCRCC
The association between tumor stage pT3 and presence of
VHL mutation/hypermethylation was statistically
significant in 2 testing (likelihood coefficient;
P = 0.009).
|
|
Influence of Tumor Stage (pT) on the Somatic VHL
Mutation/Hypermethylation Detection Rate.
The present study included patients from three different medical
centers with various numbers of CCRCCs of pT3,
pT2, and pT1 stages. We
compared the overall VHL mutation/hypermethylation detection
rate, first between CCRCCs recruited from different hospitals, and
second between CCRCCs of different pT stages (Table 5)
. Mutation/hypermethylation detection rates were 56% in patients from
the Technical University in Munich (MRI), 51% in patients from the
University of Heidelberg (KT/KTCL), and 36% in patients from the
University of Mainz (MZ). Aside from two pT1
tumors, most mutations and hypermethylations affected
pT3 and pT2 CCRCCs.
Detection rates were 42% in pT3 and 26% in
pT2 CCRCCs from Mainz (MZ), 60% in
pT3 and 36% in pT2 CCRCCs
from Heidelberg (KT/KTCL), and 66% in pT3 and
40% in pT2 in patients from Munich (MRI; Table 5
). MRI and KT/KTCL patient groups consisted predominantly of
pT3 CCRCCs, whereas the MZ patient group
consisted predominantly of pT2 CCRCCs (Table 5)
.
This distribution is reflected in the association of VHL
alterations in pT3 CCRCCs.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 5 VHL mutation detection rate in CCRCC of patients from three medical
centers in relationship to tumor staging
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
Progress has been made in the identification of cancer-specific
mutations; however, the meaning of molecular data for cancer etiology
on one hand, and cancer prognosis on the other hand, largely remains
unclear. We present a VHL mutation hot spot in sporadic
CCRCCs of patients recruited from three German regions and report an
association between somatic VHL alterations and advanced
tumor stage. Our observations are based on the uniform
histopathological classification of a large panel of renal epithelial
tumors following the refined recommendations of the UICC and AJCC
(19)
, somatic VHL mutation and hypermethylation
analyses of the tumors, and the statistical evaluation of an
association between histopathological characteristics, molecular data,
and tumor staging (pT). We analyzed patients from three medical centers
in Germany, i.e., the Technical University of Munich, the
University of Heidelberg, and the University of Mainz, located within
regions suspect to high renal cancer incidence. Although detailed
epidemiological data on renal cancer incidence of these geographic
regions are sparse (27)
, high renal cancer incidence in
Germany and Northern Europe has been reported (17
, 28)
;
there should be mention of the neighboring location of two areas
(Heidelberg and Mainz) to the French Bas Rhin region, which is known
for one of the highest renal cancer incidences in the world
(17)
.
Similarly to previous studies from the United States, Great Britain,
Europe, and Japan (3
, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
, we established somatic
VHL mutations and hypermethylations in 45% of sporadic
CCRCCs; however, the observation of a somatic VHL mutation
hot spot and the association of VHL mutations with
pT3 CCRCCs are novel observations. Altogether, we
observed 60 different genetic and epigenetic changes at VHL,
yet 30% of all alterations affected two major sites: (a)
18% of VHL-defective carcinomas showed hypermethylation and
frameshift mutation at the NotI restriction site of exon 1;
and (b) 12% had somatic VHL mutations that
clustered within the nucleotide sequence containing a pentamer thymine
repeat. Whereas frequent hypermethylation has been reported previously
(9)
, only this study revealed frequent somatic mutations
at a specific sequence. The independent origin of mutations at the
proposed somatic VHL mutation hot spot is suggested by the
findings of different mutations, i.e., deletion of adenine,
deletion or insertion of a single thymine, and deletions of 5, 7, or 16
nucleotides, and confirmed by independent repetition of experiments.
The combined data set of published somatic VHL mutations
failed to identify this hot spot (3
, 5, 6, 7, 8)
. We propose
that our findings of a somatic VHL mutation hot spot point
to geographical and/or epidemiological differences in the occurrence of
RCCs and CCRCCs, respectively, which is in agreement with the observed
high incidence of RCCs in Europe, in particular the Bas Rhin region
(17
, 28) .
All mutations at the observed VHL exon 2 mutation hot spot
predict truncation of the pVHL at amino acids isoleucine at codon 147
or phenylalanine at codon 148. These residues are located within the S7
unit of the ß sheet domain, and truncation will result in loss of the
entire pVHL
-domain that contains the critical residues for ElonginC
binding (29
, 30)
. The structural similarity of
ElonginC-VHL with the Skp1-F-box protein complex of the Skp1-Cul1-F-box
protein multiprotein complex (which targets proteins for degradation)
supports the role of pVHL in an analogous pathway (29)
.
Thus, tumorigenesis of CCRCCs may be determined by loss of that
particular function. Among mutations identified in the germ-line of
patients with VHL disease, mutations are biased to occur within the
nucleotide sequence encoding the ElonginC binding region. In contrast,
somatic mutations mainly seem to affect this region indirectly by
mutations at sites 5' upstream within exon 2. The different mutation
spectrum between the germ-line and somatic cells was assumed previously
to reflect environmental carcinogenic effects (3)
. The
herein observed frequent thymine cluster mutations within exon 2
support this view. Known mechanisms that may explain thymine mutation
involve direct or indirect radiation effects (31)
and
interaction of DNA with alkylating agents (32)
. For
example, the formation of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers is a well-known
mechanism to covalently link adjacent pyrimidine rings in the same
polynucleotide chain upon UV radiation (33)
. The thymine
run (ATT.TTT) in VHL exon 2 provides the structural basis of
adjacent pyrimidine rings for dimerization to occur. Likewise,
alkylating agents known to be electrophilic compounds to interact with
strong nucleophilic sites such as
N3
-adenine may explain frequent
mutations at T-rich sites (34)
. Although no defined
carcinogen is known to be involved in RCCs of patients of this study
panel, shared environmental exposures and life-style as well as
variation in individual human susceptibility may contribute to a
confounding effect of somatic VHL hot spot mutations.
VHL alterations are considered to be an early event in renal
tumorigenesis (3)
. Our findings of mutations and
hypermethylations in CCRCCs of all stages and nuclear grade are in
agreement with the current view of the VHL gene being a
gatekeeper in the development of RCCs. Although we were only able to
analyze a few small (pT1) CCRCCs, the presence of
VHL mutations in any pT1 tumor
supports the current concept of the VHL gene being an early
event in renal tumorigenesis. However, according to another current
view, the VHL gene may not be the sole tumor suppressor or
gatekeeper gene for CCRCCs and RCCs. This has long been suspected on
the basis of LOH data as well as gene mapping efforts and mutation
analyses by others (35, 36, 37)
. Now, detailed somatic
VHL analysis in various tumor stages also supports this
view. In light of the current understanding of the pleiotropy of
VHL functions (10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15)
, these two concepts are
not mutually exclusive but may rather complement each other. Whereas
the VHL gene may be a gatekeeper for renal epithelial growth
in those RCCs with VHL alterations, those RCCs for which
VHL mutations have not been identified may enter the
carcinogenic pathway through damage of other genes. Hence, because pVHL
participates in numerous cellular control pathways, dysregulation of
pVHL without any synchronously underlying VHL gene mutation
may be critical in the tumorigenesis of these RCCs. Papillary
(chromophilic) RCCs also seem to follow more than one molecular
pathway, i.e., mutations in the MET
proto-oncogene (36)
are responsible for the expression of
a distinct morphological phenotype referred to as papillary RCC type 1
(38)
. We occasionally observed VHL
hypermethylation in highly malignant papillary (chromophilic) RCCs. Our
findings are in contrast to a previous report that excluded
VHL mutations from RCCs other than nonpapillary
(8)
, a previously used synonym for CCRCCs.
VHL mutations and hypermethylations seem not to influence
malignant behavior determined by nuclear grade but rather may provide a
growth advantage to mutated renal epithelial cells in their transition
to CCRCCs. We predominantly observed VHL mutations and
hypermethylations in stage pT3 CCRCCs, which
invade adrenal gland and perinephric tissue and grow beyond major
veins, but we observed fewer mutations and hypermethylations in stage
pT2 tumors limited to the kidney parenchyma. To
our knowledge, this is first evidence for a possible link between
somatic VHL mutations and a standard prognostic factor. In
contrast, CCRCCs associated with germ-line VHL mutations
tend to be more indolent than their somatic counterparts
(39)
. Growth delay in germ-line VHL-affected
renal epithelial cells and growth advantage in somatically
VHL-affected renal epithelial cells may point to a
confounding role of differentiation during tumorigenesis of
CCRCCs.
Further evidence for an association of somatic VHL
mutations with nonfavorable prognosis comes from the observations of
the lack of VHL mutations in chromophobe RCCs and renal
oncocytomas. Renal oncocytomas are benign, and the more favorable
prognosis of chromophobe RCC has been reported in the literature
(40
, 41) . Lack of VHL alterations in these two
classes of renal tumors may be a molecular hint for benign or less
aggressive behavior. These findings are in agreement with the
evolutionary model of renal tumors, according to which CCRCCs and
papillary (chromophilic) RCCs develop from proximal tubular cells,
whereas chromophobe RCCs and renal oncocytomas derive from intercalated
cells of the cortical portion of the collecting duct (18)
.
Our data suggest that aside from different morphological and biological
characteristics, proximal and distal nephrons differ with respect to
their susceptibility to acquire somatic VHL mutations. It
follows that VHL mutations may be useful in the assessment
of RCCs with aggressive biological behavior. The late recognition of
chromophobe RCCs as a separate entity among RCCs with "light cell"
appearance reflects the difficulty for inexperienced viewers to
distinguish less favorable CCRCCs and more favorable chromophobe RCCs
(18)
. However, the different biological behavior noticed
by others makes this distinction clinically important (40
, 41)
. We infer that identification of somatic VHL
mutation in any unknown "light cell" RCC suggests the diagnosis of
CCRCC with less favorable prognosis, which consequently mandates
stringent clinical management.
Finally, our work provides another important novel aspect. We
noticed the wide range of somatic VHL mutation detection
rates reported by others previously, which ranged from 33 to 57%
(3
, 5, 6, 7, 8)
. Together with hypermethylations
(9)
, somatic VHL alterations accounted for up
to 80% in CCRCCs. Although a 100% VHL mutation detection
frequency was reported for germ-line mutations (23)
, no
study of sporadic tumors showed alterations of all tumors; however, it
was inferred that all sporadic CCRCCs may carry somatic VHL
alterations. In our study, which technically matches those of other
somatic VHL mutation and hypermethylation studies
(3
, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
, we now demonstrated that there may be true
differences in somatic VHL mutation detection rates,
reflecting the number of pT3 tumors included in
the analyzed patient samples. In these previous studies, no attention
was paid to detailed histopathological parameters (3
, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)
. This study showed that the VHL
mutation/hypermethylation detection rate was highest in those
patient groups with the highest numbers of pT3
CCRCCs. In contrast, it was lowest in the patient group with
predominant pT2 tumors. These coincidences
provided us with the opportunity to establish various VHL
mutation/hypermethylation detection frequencies in relationship to
tumor staging. The interpretations of our data are based on the
sensitivity of enzymatic NotI digestion and Southern
blotting as well as SSCP and sequencing to detect most somatic
VHL alterations. Our data support the notion that the
presence of VHL defects may not only provide a growth
advantage to affected CCRCCs but also may allow this growth advantage
to be determined at all tumor stages.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We acknowledge establishment of RCC cell lines (KTCL) by D.
Komitowski and H. Löhrke, German Cancer Research Center,
Heidelberg, and preparation of Figs. 1
and 2
by B. Borstel, Dr.
Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart,
Germany.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by Grants 93.004.1-3 and 93.038.2 from
Wilhelm Sander-Stiftung, Grant De356/3-3/4 from the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grant 519, C2 from SFB, and a grant from
the Bioscientia Institute Ltd. D. G. was supported by Deutscher
Akademischer Austauschdienst and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, and
C. P. was supported by Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institute of Clinical
Pharmacology, Auerbachstrasse 112, 70376 Stuttgart, Germany. Phone:
49-711-8101-3705; Fax: 49-711-85-92-95; E-mail: hiltrud.brauch{at}ikp-stuttgart.de 
3 The abbreviations used are: CCRCC, clear cell
renal cell carcinoma; RCC, renal cell carcinoma; UICC, Union
Internationale Contre le Cancer; AJCC, American Joint Committee on
Cancer; VHL, von Hippel-Lindau; pVHL, VHL protein; SSCP, single-strand
conformation polymorphism; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; MRI, tumors
from University Hospital Munich rechts der Isar, Technical University
Munich; KT and KTCL, kidney tumors and kidney tumor cell lines from
University Hospital Heidelberg; MZ, tumors from University Hospital
Mainz. 
Received 8/24/99.
Accepted 2/ 1/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Latif F., Tory K., Gnarra J., Yao M., Duh F. M., Orcutt M. L., Stackhouse T., Kuzmin I., Modi W., Geil L., Schmidt L., Zhou F., Li H., Wei M. H., Chen F., Glenn G., Choyke P., Walther M. M., Weng Y., Duan D. S. R., Dean M., Glavac D., Richards F. M., Crossey P. A., Ferguson-Smith M. A., Le Paslier D., Chumakov I., Cohen D., Chinault A. C., Maher E. R., Linehan W. M., Zbar B., Lerman M. I. Identification of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Science (Washington DC), 260: 1317-1320, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zbar B., Kishida T., Chen F., Schmidt L., Maher E. R., Richards F. M., Crossey P. A., Webster A. R., Affara N. A., Ferguson-Smith M. A., Brauch H., Glavac D., Neumann H. P. H., Tisherman S., Mulvehill J., Gross D., Shuin T., Whaley J., Seizinger B., Kley N., Olschwang S., Boisson C., Richard S., Lips C. H. M., Linehan W. M., Lerman M. I. Germline mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau disease gene (VHL) in families from North America, Europe, and Japan. Hum. Mutat., 8: 348-357, 1996.[Medline]
-
Gnarra J. R., Tory K., Weng Y., Schmidt L., Wei M. W., Li H., Latif F., Liu S., Chen F., Duh F. M., Lubensky I., Duan D. R., Florence C., Pozzati R., Walther M. M., Bander N. H., Grossman H. B., Brauch H., Pomer S., Brooks J. D., Isaacs W. B., Lerman M. I., Zbar B., Linehan W. M. Mutations of the VHL tumour suppressor gene in renal carcinoma. Nat. Genet., 7: 85-90, 1994.[Medline]
-
Zbar B., Brauch H., Talmadge C., Linehan M. Loss of alleles of loci on the short arm of chromosome 3 in renal cell carcinoma. Nature (Lond.), 327: 721-724, 1987.[Medline]
-
Foster K., Prowse A., van den Bergh A., Fleming S., Hulsbeek M. M. F., Crossey P. A., Richards F. M., Cairns P., Affara N. A., Ferguson-Smith M. A., Buys C. H. C. M., Maher E. R. Somatic mutations of the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene in non-familial clear cell renal carcinoma. Hum. Mol. Genet., 3: 2169-2173, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Shuin T., Kondo K., Torigoe S., Kishida T., Kubota Y., Hosaka M., Nagashima Y., Kitamura H., Latif F., Zbar B., Lerman M. I., Yao M. Frequent somatic mutations and loss of heterozygosity of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene in primary human renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Res., 54: 2852-2855, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Whaley J. M., Naglich J., Gelbert L., Hsia Y. E., Lamiell J. M., Green J. S., Collins D., Neumann H. P. H., Laidlaw J., Li F. P., Klein-Szanto A. J. P., Seizinger B., Kley N. Germline mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene are similar to somatic von Hippel-Lindau aberrations in sporadic renal cell carcinoma. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 55: 1092-1102, 1994.[Medline]
-
Kenck C., Wilhelm M., Bugert P., Staehler G., Kovacs G. Mutations of the VHL gene is associated exclusively with the development of non-papillary renal cell carcinomas. J. Pathol., 179: 157-161, 1996.[Medline]
-
Herman J. G., Latif F., Weng Y., Lerman M. I., Zbar B., Liu S., Samid D., Duan D. S. R., Gnarra J. R., Linehan W. M., Baylin S. Silencing of the VHL tumor-suppressor gene by DNA methylation in renal carcinoma. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 9700-9704, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pause A., Lee S., Worrell R., Chen D. Y. T., Burgess W. H., Linehan W. M., Klausner R. D. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor gene product forms a stable complex with human CUL-2, a member of the Cdc53 family of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 2156-2161, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gorospe M., Egan J. M., Zbar B., Lerman M. I., Geil L., Kuzmin I., Holbrook N. J. Protective function of the von Hippel-Lindau protein against impaired protein processing in renal carcinoma cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 1289-1300, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Siemeister G., Weindel K., Mohrs K., Barleon B., Martiny-Baron G., Marme D. Reversion of deregulated expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in human renal cell carcinoma cells by von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. Cancer Res., 56: 2299-2301, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Maxwell P. H., Wiesener M. S., Chang G-W., Clifford S. C., Vaux E. C., Cockman M. E., Wykoff C. C., Pugh C. W., Maher E. R., Ratcliffe P. J. The tumor suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature (Lond.), 399: 271-275, 1999.[Medline]
-
Ivanov S. V., Kuzmin I., Wei M. H., Pack S., Geil L., Johnson B. E., Stanbridge E. J., Lerman M. I. Down-regulation of transmembrane carbonic anhydrases in renal cell carcinoma cell lines by wild-type von Hippel-Lindau transgenes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 12596-12601, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ohh M., Yauch R. L., Lonergan K. M., Whaley J. M., Stemmer-Rachmamimov A. O., Louis D. N., Gavin B. J., Kaelin W. G., Jr., Iliopoulos O. The von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein is required for proper assembly of an extracellular fibronectin matrix. Mol. Cell, 1: 959-968, 1998.[Medline]
-
Brauch H., Weirich G., Hornauer M. A., Störkel S., Wöhl T., Brüning T. Trichloroethylene exposure and specific somatic mutations in patients with renal cell carcinoma. J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 91: 854-861, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Parkin, D. M., Muir, C. S., Whelan, S. L., Gao, Y-T., Ferlay, J., and Powell, J. Cancer Incidence in Five Continents. VI. IARC Scientific Publication No. 120. Lyon, France: IARC, 1992.
-
Thoenes W., Störkel S., Rumpelt H. J. Histopathology and classification of renal cell tumors (adenomas, renal oncocytomas and carcinomas). The basic cytological and histopathological elements and their use for diagnostics. Path. Res. Pract., 181: 125-143, 1986.
-
Störkel S., Eble J. N., Adlakha K., Amin M., Blute M. L., Bostwick D. G., Darson M., Delahunt B., Iczkowski K. Classification of renal cell carcinoma. Workgroup No. 1, Union Internationale Contre Le Cancer (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Cancer, 80: 987-989, 1997.[Medline]
-
TNM Atlas Illustrated Guide to the TNM/pTNM Classification of Malignant Tumours. Int. Union Against CancerUnion Internationale Contre le Cancer, Ed. 3. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 1992.
-
Glavac D., Neumann H. P. H., Wittke C., Jähnig H., Rödl H., Masek O., Streicher T., Pausch F., Engelhardt D., Plate K., Höfler H., Chen F., Zbar B., Brauch H. Mutations in the VHL tumor suppressor gene and associated lesions with von Hippel-Lindau disease from Central Europe. Hum. Genet., 98: 271-280, 1996.[Medline]
-
Chen F., Kishida T., Yao M., Hustad T., Glavac D., Dean M., Gnarra J. R., Orcutt M. L., Duh F. M., Glenn G., Green J., Hsia E., Lamiell J., Li H., Wei M. H., Schmidt L., Tory K., Kuzmin I., Stackhouse T., Latif F., Linehan M. W., Lerman M. I., Zbar B. Germline mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene: correlations with phenotype. Hum. Mutat., 5: 66-75, 1995.[Medline]
-
Stolle C., Glenn G., Zbar B., Humphrey J. S., Choyke P., Walther M., Pack S., Hurley K., Andrey C., Klausner R., Linehan W. M. Improved detection of germline mutations in the von Hippel-Lindau disease tumor suppressor gene. Hum. Mutat., 12: 417-423, 1998.[Medline]
-
Brauch H., Kishida T., Glava
D., Chen F., Pausch F., Höfler H., Lerman M. I., Zbar B., Neumann H. P. H. Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease with pheochromocytoma in the Black Forest region in Germany: evidence for a founder effect. Hum. Genet., 95: 551-556, 1995.[Medline]
-
Brauch H., Pomer S., Hieronymus T., Schadt T., Löhrke H., Komitowski D. Genetic alterations in sporadic renal-cell carcinoma: molecular analyses of tumor suppressor gene harboring chromosomal regions 3p, 5q, and 17. p. World J. Urol., 12: 162-168, 1994.[Medline]
-
Stokes M. E., Davis C. S., Koch G. G. Categorical Data Analysis Using the SAS System499 SAS Institute, Inc. Cary, NC 1995.
-
Becker N., Wahrendorf J. Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the Federal Republic of Germany 19811990Ed Springer Verlag 3. (Krebsatlas der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 19811990, Ed. 3.) Berlin 1998.
-
McLaughlin J. K., Schuman L. M. Epidemiology of renal carcinoma Lilienfeld A. M. eds. . Reviews in Cancer Epidemiology, : 170-210, Elsevier New York 1983.
-
Stebbins C. E., Kaelin W. G., Jr., Pavletich N. P. Structure of the VHL-ElonginC-ElonginB complex: implications for VHL tumor suppressor function. Science (Washington DC), 284: 455-461, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Kibel A., Iliopoulos O., DeCaprio J. A., Kaelin W. G., Jr. Binding of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein to Elongin B and C. Science (Washington DC), 269: 1444-1446, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Ward J. F. DNA damage produced by ionizing radiation in mammalian cells: identities, mechanisms of formation, and reparability. Prog. Nucleic Acid Res. Mol. Biol., 35: 95-125, 1988.[Medline]
-
Singer B. O-Alkyl pyrimidines in mutagenesis and carcinogenesis: occurrence and significance. Cancer Res., 46: 4879-4885, 1986.[Free Full Text]
-
Setlow R. B. Cyclobutane-type pyrimidine dimers in polynucleotides. Science (Washington DC), 153: 379-386, 1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Pegg A. E. Methylation of the O6 position of guanine in DNA is the most likely initiating event in carcinogenesis by methylating agents. Cancer Investig., 2: 223-231, 1984.[Medline]
-
van den Berg A., Buys C. H. Involvement of multiple loci on chromosome 3 in renal cell cancer development. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 19: 59-79, 1997.[Medline]
-
Schmidt L., Duh F. M., Chen F., Kishida T., Glenn G., Choyke P., Scherer S. W., Zhuang Z., Lubensky I., Dean M., Allikmets R., Chidambaram A., Bergerheim U. F., Feltis J. T., Casadevall C., Zamarron A., Bernues M., Richard S., Lips C. J. M., Walther M. M., Tsui L. C., Geil L., Orcutt M. L., Stackhouse T., Lipan J., Slife L., Brauch H., Decker J., Niehans G., Hughson M. D., Moch H., Störkel S., Lerman M. I., Linehan W. M., Zbar B. Germline and somatic mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Nat. Genet., 16: 68-73, 1997.[Medline]
-
Schmidt L., Junker K., Nakaigawa N., Kinjerski T., Weirich G., Miller M., Lubensky I., Neumann H. P. H., Brauch H., Decker J., Vocke C., Brown J. A., Jenkins R., Richard S., Bergerheim U., Gerrard B., Dean M., Linehan W. M., Zbar B. Novel mutations in the MET proto-oncogene in papillary renal carcinomas. Oncogene, 18: 2343-2350, 1999.[Medline]
-
Lubensky I. A., Schmidt L., Zhuang Z., Weirich G., Pack S., Zambrano N., Walther M. M., Choyke P., Linehan W. M., Zbar B. Hereditary and sporadic papillary renal carcinomas with c-met mutations share a distinct morphological phenotype. Am. J. Pathol., 155: 517-526, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Neumann H. P. H., Bender B. U., Berger D. P., Laubenberger J., Schultze-Seemann W., Wetterauer U., Ferstl F. J., Herbst E. W., Schwarzkopf G., Hes F. J., Lips C. J. M., Lamiell J. M., Masek O., Riegler P., Mueller B., Glava
D., Brauch H. Prevalence, morphology and biology of renal cell carcinoma in von Hippel-Lindau disease compared to sporadic renal cell carcinoma. J. Urol., 160: 1248-1254, 1998.[Medline]
-
Thoenes W., Störkel S., Rumpelt H. J., Moll R., Baum H. P., Werner S. Chromophobe cell renal carcinomas and its variantsa report on 32 cases. J. Pathol., 155: 277-287, 1988.[Medline]
-
Crotty T. B., Farrow G. M., Lieber M. M. Chromophobe cell renal carcinoma: clinicopathological features of 50 cases. J. Urol., 154: 964-967, 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
T. B. Dorff, A. Goldkorn, and D. I. Quinn
Review: Targeted therapy in renal cancer
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology,
November 1, 2009;
1(3):
183 - 205.
[Abstract]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. L. Nickerson, E. Jaeger, Y. Shi, J. A. Durocher, S. Mahurkar, D. Zaridze, V. Matveev, V. Janout, H. Kollarova, V. Bencko, et al.
Improved Identification of von Hippel-Lindau Gene Alterations in Clear Cell Renal Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2008;
14(15):
4726 - 4734.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. M. Smits, L. J. Schouten, B. A.C. van Dijk, C. A. Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, K. A.D. Wouters, E. Oosterwijk, M. van Engeland, and P. A. van den Brandt
Genetic and Epigenetic Alterations in the von Hippel-Lindau Gene: the Influence on Renal Cancer Prognosis
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2008;
14(3):
782 - 787.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Inoue, N. Nonomura, Y. Kojima, M. Shiba, D. Oka, Y. Arai, M. Nakayama, H. Takayama, K. Nishimura, H. Mori, et al.
Somatic mutations of the von Hippel-Lindau disease gene in renal carcinomas occurring in patients with long-term dialysis
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant.,
July 1, 2007;
22(7):
2052 - 2055.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
R. E. Banks, P. Tirukonda, C. Taylor, N. Hornigold, D. Astuti, D. Cohen, E. R. Maher, A. J. Stanley, P. Harnden, A. Joyce, et al.
Genetic and Epigenetic Analysis of von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) Gene Alterations and Relationship with Clinical Variables in Sporadic Renal Cancer
Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2006;
66(4):
2000 - 2011.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
I. Talon, V. Lindner, C. Sourbier, E. Schordan, S. Rothhut, M. Barthelmebs, H. Lang, J.-J. Helwig, and T. Massfelder
Antitumor effect of parathyroid hormone-related protein neutralizing antibody in human renal cell carcinoma in vitro and in vivo
Carcinogenesis,
January 1, 2006;
27(1):
73 - 83.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. I. Rini
VEGF-Targeted Therapy in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Oncologist,
March 1, 2005;
10(3):
191 - 197.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
B. I. Rini and E. J. Small
Biology and Clinical Development of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor-Targeted Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol.,
February 10, 2005;
23(5):
1028 - 1043.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
W. Y. Kim and W. G. Kaelin
Role of VHL Gene Mutation in Human Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol.,
December 15, 2004;
22(24):
4991 - 5004.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Schraml, A. Hergovitz, F. Hatz, M. B. Amin, S. D. Lim, W. Krek, M. J. Mihatsch, and H. Moch
Relevance of Nuclear and Cytoplasmic von Hippel Lindau Protein Expression for Renal Carcinoma Progression
Am. J. Pathol.,
September 1, 2003;
163(3):
1013 - 1020.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. K. Khoo, K. Kahnoski, J. Sugimura, D. Petillo, J. Chen, K. Shockley, J. Ludlow, R. Knapp, S. Giraud, S. Richard, et al.
Inactivation of BHD in Sporadic Renal Tumors
Cancer Res.,
August 1, 2003;
63(15):
4583 - 4587.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Yao, M. Yoshida, T. Kishida, N. Nakaigawa, M. Baba, K. Kobayashi, T. Miura, M. Moriyama, Y. Nagashima, Y. Nakatani, et al.
VHL Tumor Suppressor Gene Alterations Associated With Good Prognosis in Sporadic Clear-Cell Renal Carcinoma
J Natl Cancer Inst,
October 16, 2002;
94(20):
1569 - 1575.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
E. R. Suh, C. S. Ha, E. B. Rankin, M. Toyota, and P. G. Traber
DNA Methylation Down-regulates CDX1 Gene Expression in Colorectal Cancer Cell Lines
J. Biol. Chem.,
September 20, 2002;
277(39):
35795 - 35800.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Siegsmund, U. Brinkmann, E. Schaffeler, G. Weirich, M. Schwab, M. Eichelbaum, P. Fritz, O. Burk, J. Decker, P. Alken, et al.
Association of the P-Glycoprotein Transporter MDR1C3435T Polymorphism with the Susceptibility to Renal Epithelial Tumors
J. Am. Soc. Nephrol.,
July 1, 2002;
13(7):
1847 - 1854.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
K. Hemminki, Y. Jiang, X. Ma, K. Yang, L. Egevad, and P. Lindblad
Molecular epidemiology of VHL gene mutations in renal cell carcinoma patients: relation to dietary and other factors
Carcinogenesis,
May 1, 2002;
23(5):
809 - 815.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M Takahashi, R Kahnoski, D Gross, D Nicol, and B T Teh
Familial adult renal neoplasia
J. Med. Genet.,
January 1, 2002;
39(1):
1 - 5.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
H. Yang and W. G. Kaelin Jr.
Molecular Pathogenesis of the Von Hippel-Lindau Hereditary Cancer Syndrome: Implications for Oxygen Sensing
Cell Growth Differ.,
September 1, 2001;
12(9):
447 - 455.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Velickovic, B. Delahunt, S. Storkel, and S. K. G. Grebem
VHL and FHIT Locus Loss of Heterozygosity Is Common in All Renal Cancer Morphotypes But Differs in Pattern and Prognostic Significance
Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2001;
61(12):
4815 - 4819.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. S. Moore, G. Zamboni, A. Brighenti, D. Lissandrini, D. Antonello, P. Capelli, G. Rigaud, M. Falconi, and A. Scarpa
Molecular Characterization of Pancreatic Serous Microcystic Adenomas : Evidence for a Tumor Suppressor Gene on Chromosome 10q
Am. J. Pathol.,
January 1, 2001;
158(1):
317 - 321.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|