Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chavanne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chavanne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.
[Cancer Research 60, 1974-1982, April 1, 2000]
© 2000 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Mutations in the XPC Gene in Families with Xeroderma Pigmentosum and Consequences at the Cell, Protein, and Transcript Levels1

Franz Chavanne, Bernard C. Broughton, Daniela Pietra, Tiziana Nardo, Alison Browitt, Alan R. Lehmann and Miria Stefanini2

Istituto di Genetica Biochimica ed Evoluzionistica CNR, 27100 Pavia, Italy [F. C., D. P., T. N., M. S.], and MRC Cell Mutation Unit, Sussex University, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9RR, United Kingdom [B. C. B., A. B., A. R. L.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP)-C is one of the more common complementation groups of XP, but causative mutations have thus far been reported for only six cases (S. G. Khan et al., J. Investig. Dermatol., 115: 791–796, 1998; L. Li et al., Nat. Genet., 5: 413–417, 1993). We have now extended this analysis by investigating the genomic and coding sequence of the XPC gene, the level of expression of the XPC transcript and the status of the XPC protein in 12 unrelated patients, including all of the 8 Italian XP-C cases identified thus far and in 13 of their parents. Eighteen mutations were detected in the open reading frame of the XPC gene, 13 of which are relevant for the pathological phenotype. The mutations are distributed across the gene, with no indication of any hotspots or founder effects. Only 1 of the 13 relevant changes is a missense mutation, the remainder causing protein truncations as a result of nonsense mutations (3), frameshifts (6), deletion (1) or splicing abnormalities (2). These findings indicate that the XPC gene is not essential for cell proliferation and viability and that mutations causing minor structural alterations may not give an XP phenotype and may not, therefore, be identified clinically. XP13PV was the only patient carrying a missense mutation (Trp690Ser on the paternal allele). This was also the only patient in which the XPC transcript was present at a normal level and the XPC protein was detectable, although at a lower than normal level. No quantitative alterations in the transcript or protein levels were detected in the XP-C heterozygous parents. However, the expression of the normal allele predominated in all of them, except the father of XP13PV, which suggests the existence of a possible mechanism for monitoring the amount of the XPC protein.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
NER3 is the principal pathway for removal of a broad spectrum of structurally unrelated lesions such as UV-induced cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts, and numerous chemical adducts. The NER system has two distinct subpathways: (a) TCR, which rapidly removes lesions from the transcribed strand of active genes; and (b) GGR, which effects the slower repair of the rest of the genome (recently reviewed in Ref. 1 ). Defects in NER have been found in association with three rare human autosomal recessive syndromes, which include XP. XP is clinically characterized by extreme sensitivity to sun-exposure, sunlight-induced pigmentation abnormalities, and a high incidence of skin cancer (2) . Progressive neurological degeneration is found in a proportion of patients.

Complementation tests by cell fusion have provided evidence for the existence of at least seven NER-deficient complementation groups: XP-A to XP-G. XP group C is one of the more common forms (3) . The patients from this group usually show only skin disorders and no neurological abnormalities. Cultured fibroblasts from XP-C patients exhibit very limited UV-induced DNA repair synthesis levels, ranging between 10 and 20% of normal, and are specifically defective in GGR. They are, however, capable of removing damage from the transcribed strand of active genes at normal rates (4, 5, 6) .

Phenotypic correction of XP-C cells by cDNA transfection resulted in the cloning of a partial but fully active XPC cDNA (7) . The full-length cDNA, isolated by Masutani et al. (8) , is 3558 nts long and the encoded 940-amino-acid product shows limited homology with the Rad4 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The human XPC gene spans about 24 kb, the transcribed sequence being divided into 15 exons (9) .

Masutani et al. (8) showed that the XPC gene encodes a Mr 125,000 protein that is present in a tight complex with the Mr 58,000 protein encoded by hHR23B, one of the two human homologues of the yeast RAD23 gene. Almost all of the XPC molecules appear to be complexed in vivo with hHR23B. Recent studies have shown that XPC-hHR23B binds to a variety of NER lesions and carries out the first step in NER (damage recognition) in transcriptionally inactive DNA (10 , 11) .

Characterization of the molecular defects in XP-C patients may provide a tool to define further the biological role of the XPC protein, as well as the sites relevant for its activity. Thus far, six XP-C cell lines have been characterized at the cDNA level, and eight mutations including point mutations, deletions and insertions have been described (12 , 13) .

In this report, we describe the clinical features and the cellular phenotype of 12 XP-C patients (8 from Italy, 1 from the United Kingdom, and 3 of Middle Eastern origin), as well as the mutations detected in the genomic and coding sequence of the XPC gene. For the Italian patients, the molecular analysis was extended to the parents to determine the allele inheritance and the linkage relationship of mutations. We have also investigated the level of expression of the XPC transcript by Northern analysis and the occurrence of the XPC protein by Western analysis.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Case Reports.
The study was performed on 12 patients showing clinical symptoms typical of XP and classified by genetic analysis into the XP-C group. The 8 patients coded with the suffix PV represent all of the XP-C cases identified in Italy thus far. XP4BR is a typical XP-C patient of Middle Eastern origin (14) . XP4RO is of historical interest as it was the first XP to be used in complementation analysis (15) . XP6BR is a very unusual patient, who, at the age of 67, had had multiple self-healing melanomas (16) . XP14BR was unusual in that, apart from the expected sensitivity to UV light, both the individual and her cells were sensitive to ionizing radiation. Clinical features and related literature references for all of the patients are reported in Table 1Citation . In common with most XP-C individuals described in the literature, none of the analyzed cases showed neurological abnormalities.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Clinical features and DNA repair data of the 12 XP-C patients analyzed in this study

 
Cells and Culture Conditions.
Primary fibroblast cultures were established from biopsies of unaffected skin obtained from the 12 patients and 11 parents. Fibroblasts were routinely grown in Ham’s F-10 medium (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD) supplemented with 12% FCS (Irvine, Santa Ana, CA) or Eagle’s MEM (Life Technologies, Inc.) supplemented with 15% FCS (PAA Laboratories, Teddington, United Kingdom). Fibroblasts from eight healthy donors (C1PV, C3PV, B119, CF, FB345, FB377, FB380, FB383) and from two XP patients previously assigned to group C were used as reference strains in the study.

Lymphoblastoid cell lines were established by EBV transformation of peripheral blood lymphocytes from a normal donor (352/96), XP26PV, and the parents of the latter. These cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% FCS in a 3% CO2 atmosphere.

DNA-Repair Investigations.
The response to UV irradiation was analyzed by measuring UDS, cell survival in proliferating and nonproliferating cultures, and recovery of RNA synthesis after exposure to UV light. The definition of the genetic defect responsible for the UV hypersensitivity was carried out by classical complementation assays. Procedures for cell survival, UDS, recovery of RNA synthesis, and genetic analysis are routinely used in our laboratory and have all been described previously (17 , 18) .

Western Blot Analysis.
Cells (2–5 x 106) were sonicated on ice for 60 s in sample buffer [62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH6.8), 4 M urea, 10% glycerol, 2% SDS, 5% ß-mercaptoethanol, and 0.003% bromophenol blue] and incubated at 65°C for 15 min before loading, as described by Shah et al. (19) . Protein samples were electrophoresed on 6% polyacrylamide-SDS gels and transferred onto Hybond-C membrane (Amersham, Little Chalfont, United Kingdom) at 120V for 1 h in ice-cold transfer buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, and 20% methanol). The membranes were incubated in two blocking buffers successively: for 1 h in 1% casein in PBS and for another hour in 5% skim milk in 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 50 mM NaCl, and 0.15% Tween 20. The blots were probed in a fresh solution of the second blocking buffer with the first antibody (anti-XPC directed against the last 19 amino acids of the XPC protein or the antibody against the Mr 62,000 subunit of TFIIH as loading control), and then with the second antibody (antirabbit F(ab')2 or antimouse, respectively) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase. Detection was carried out with the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Pierce, Rockford, IL) and Hyperfilm MP (Amersham).

Northern Blot Analysis.
RNA was extracted by a cesium chloride-gradient centrifugation procedure from samples of 2 x 107 fibroblasts or 1 x 108 lymphoblastoid cells resuspended in 1 ml of guanidinium thiocyanate buffer [4 M guanidinium thiocyanate and 3 M sodium acetate (pH 6)].

Total RNA (5 µg) was electrophoresed on 1.2% agarose formaldehyde gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and blotted onto Hybond-N membrane (Amersham). Hybridization was carried out by overnight incubation with an XPC probe corresponding to cDNA nts 286-1413. The probe was obtained by PCR amplification and was radiolabeled using the megaprime DNA labeling system (Amersham). The signals were normalized against the ethidium bromide-stained signals of 28S rRNA.

Sequence Analysis of the XPC Gene.
RNA was extracted from approximately 2 x 106 fibroblasts or 2 x 107 lymphoblastoid cells using lysis with guanidium isothiocyanate followed by phenol extraction and isopropanol precipitation. cDNA synthesis was carried out using oligo d(T) primers, 2 µg RNA, and Mu-MLV reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) in a total volume of 40 µl. After incubation for 1 h at 37°C, the mixture was diluted to 50 µl. Ten µl of the cDNA synthesis reaction was used for PCR amplification (Amplitaq, Perkin-Elmer, Norwalk, CT) in the buffer supplied by the manufacturer. The whole XPC coding region was amplified in four overlapping fragments (Table 2)Citation . Amplification was performed under the conditions described by Li et al. (12) , except for the primers F1 and F2, which were used with the following parameters: 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min, 60°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 2.5 min.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 PCR amplification of the XPC gene

 
Genomic DNA was isolated from approximately 5 x 106 fibroblasts or 4 x 107 lymphoblastoid cells using proteinase K digestion and phenol extraction. Genomic DNA amplification was carried out on 0.5-µg samples using the primers listed in Table 2Citation . Fragments less than 5 kb in length were amplified using AmpliTaq Gold (Perkin-Elmer) and the following conditions: 1 cycle at 95°C for 12 min and 35 cycles at 95°C for 1 min and at 63°C for 10 min. The other fragments were amplified with XL-PCR (Perkin-Elmer) in the buffer supplied by the manufacturer. PCR conditions were 1 cycle at 94°C for 4 min and 35 cycles at 94°C for 1 min and at 68°C for 10 min. PCR products were purified by agarose gel electrophoresis and manually sequenced using a Thermo Sequenase radiolabeled terminator cycle sequencing kit (Amersham).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The study was performed on 12 patients showing clinical symptoms typical of XP (Table 1)Citation and classified by genetic analysis into the XP-C group. As shown in Fig. 1Citation , the eight Italian patients showed similar alterations in the cellular response to UV irradiation: drastically reduced UV-induced DNA repair synthesis levels (with UDS levels ranging between 10 and 20% of normal); substantial sensitivity to the killing effects of UV light in proliferating cultures, but normal recovery of RNA synthesis at late times after irradiation; and survival levels in nonproliferating cultures that were significantly affected only at high UV doses. Similar alterations have been described in the patients XP4RO, XP4BR, XP14BR, and XP6BR (see references in Table 1Citation ). This pattern of response to UV light is typically present in XP cells belonging to group C, and it reflects a specific defect in GGR. Normal TCR in XP-C cells results in normal rates of recovery of RNA synthesis. In nondividing cells, the ability to carry out GGR is of relatively minor importance because only the actively transcribed regions of DNA are used, and nondividing XP-C cells consequently have close-to-normal survival levels (4) .



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Response to UV irradiation in fibroblast strains from eight Italian XP-C patients (- - - -) and from four normal subjects (—–). The reported values are the mean of at least two independent experiments with SEs always lower than 10%. A, UV-induced DNA repair synthesis expressed as mean number of autoradiographic grains/nucleus. B, recovery of RNA synthesis after UV irradiation in cells labeled with [3H]uridine 24 h after irradiation; incorporation values in irradiated samples are expressed as percentages of those in unirradiated cells (%C). C-D, sensitivity to the lethal effects of UV light in proliferating (C) and nondividing (D) cells; gray-shaded areas, the range of survival in cells from normal subjects.

 
To investigate the status of the XPC protein in the XP-C cells, Western blot analysis was carried out using antibodies specifically recognizing the COOH-terminal region of the protein. The XPC protein was clearly detectable in cell extracts from the 2 normal individuals and 13 XP parents, and in one patient (XP13PV), although at a lower level; it was not observed in any of the other XP-C patients (Fig. 2Citation and data not shown), which indicated that the XPC protein in these patients either was not present or was lacking the COOH-terminal region that was used to raise the antibodies.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Expression of the XPC protein. Total cell lysates from the different XP-C patients, their parents, and a normal individual were analyzed by Western blotting with anti-XPC polyclonal antibodies. Equal loading of proteins was visualized by using anti-p62 monoclonal antibodies.

 
To define the molecular defect, total RNA from the 12 XP-C patients was reverse transcribed and the whole XPC cDNA was amplified in four overlapping fragments, which were then directly sequenced. Results of our analysis are summarized in Table 3Citation . Eighteen mutations were detected in the open reading frame of the XPC gene, 13 of which are relevant for the pathological phenotype, the other 5 being polymorphisms. However, when we analyzed the XPC cDNA from the parents using standard amplification conditions, we were unable to detect the mutations found in the patients in any of the cases except the father of XP13PV. This suggested that, with this one exception, the expression of the mutant RNA was much lower in heterozygotes than that of the normal RNA. Therefore, in the eight Italian patients, the genomic DNA regions containing the mutations were sequenced, and the pattern of inheritance of the alleles was established by analyzing the relevant genomic DNA regions of the parents.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 3 Inactivating mutations and polymorphisms found in the 12 XP-C patients analyzed

 
As shown in Table 3Citation , the most common inactivating changes are frameshift mutations resulting from the insertion or deletion of one or two bases. The loss of the C residue at position 128 was detected in both alleles of patients XP12PV and XP18PV (Fig. 3B)Citation , and in the maternal allele of patient XP19PV—the paternal allele carrying an AA deletion at position 1103–1104 (Fig. 3D)Citation . An insertion of two A residues at position 321 was observed in both of the alleles of XP5PV (Fig. 3A)Citation and in the maternal allele of XP13PV (Fig. 3C)Citation . Three patients were homozygous for other frameshift mutations: insertion of a single T residue at position 671 (XP4BR), deletion of the dinucleotide TG at position 1643–1644 (XP26PV), and deletion of C2257 (XP9PV; Fig. 3ACitation ). Three of the four deletions detected (namely, -C128, -TG1643–1644, and -C2257) and the AA321 insertion occur in runs of identical bases and are likely to result from replication slippage.



View larger version (96K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Mutations in the XPC gene of patients XP5PV, XP9PV, XP12PV, XP13PV, XP18PV, and XP19PV. Autoradiographs of sequencing gels: A, the AA321 insertion in the patient XP5PV and the C2257 deletion and C to A transversion six bases upstream from the intron 11-exon 12 junction in XP9PV and his mother; B, the C128 deletion in the XP12PV and XP18PV families; C, the G2069C and G2061A changes and the AA321 insertion in the XP13PV family; D, the C128 deletion and AA 1103–1104 deletion in the XP19PV family.

 
Three nonsense mutations consisting of C to T transitions at positions 658, 1735, and 2152, were observed in both alleles of the patients XP4RO, XP10PV, and XP14BR, respectively. All of the transitions occur at CpG sites, probably resulting from demethylation of 5-methylcytosine to thymine. They all induce Arg to opal substitutions.

A G2069C transversion was found in the paternal allele of XP13PV (Fig. 3C)Citation ; this missense mutation causes the change of amino acid 690 from Trp to Ser. Trp-690 is conserved in five homologues (human, mouse, Drosophila melanogaster, and the yeasts S. cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe), and it is located in a sequence of five amino acids that are predicted to be in an {alpha}-helical conformation by the PHD secondary structure prediction protocol (20, 21, 22) . The alteration of Trp to Ser is predicted to destroy this {alpha}-helical conformation, so that this amino acid substitution probably induces some change in the secondary structure of the XPC protein. The presence of a missense mutation in this patient is consistent with the presence of detectable XPC protein in the Western blots (Fig. 2)Citation .

A large deletion of 184 nts, from position 2421 to 2604, was found in one allele of XP6BR cDNA. This deletion comprises exons 13 and 14 (9) and could arise either as a splicing abnormality or as a genuine deletion in genomic DNA with the deletion break points in introns 12 and 14. The latter is supported by Southern analysis using a 3' XPC cDNA probe spanning nts 2400–3000, which showed—in addition to the bands seen in normal cells—an extra band after the digestion of the genomic DNA with EcoRI or BamHI (Fig. 4)Citation . Because of a very low level of expression of the second allele in XP6BR, the inactivating mutation present on this allele was not identified.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Southern analysis, using a 3' XPC cDNA probe that spanned nts 2400–3000 of the XP6BR (Lanes 1 and 3) and normal (Lanes 2 and 4) XPC genomic DNA after digestion with BamHI (Lanes 1 and 2) or EcoRI (Lanes 3 and 4). Autoradiograph shows the presence in XP6BR of an extra band, in addition to the bands seen in normal cells.

 
Besides the normally spliced product, abnormal splicing of the XPC mRNA was observed in three patients—XP9PV, XP10PV, and XP26PV. In XP9PV, the whole of exon 12 (nts 2251–2420) was absent. Sequencing of the genomic region corresponding to exon 12 and of the intron sequences at the 5' and 3' end of exon 12 showed that the patient was homozygous for two mutations: (a) deletion of the C residue at position 2257 in exon 12, as already described; and (b) a C to A change in the intron 11 acceptor site, six nts upstream from the intron 11–exon 12 junction (Fig. 3A)Citation . This mutation reduces the efficiency of the splice acceptor site of intron 11 by interrupting the polypyrimidine tract. These two mutations are 13 bp apart in the genomic DNA and could conceivably have arisen from a single event. The net result is the generation of two differentially spliced products, one of normal size containing the C2257 deletion and the other lacking the whole of exon 12.

In the XPC coding sequences of patients XP10PV and XP26PV, both of which contain mutations toward the 3' end of exon 8, we observed a deletion of nts 1627–1872, corresponding to the last 246 nts of exon 8. Low levels of cDNAs with this deletion could also be detected in the parents of both patients (Fig. 5)Citation . Amplification and sequencing of the regions around the mutations and around the splice donor site of intron 8 in the genomic DNA of these patients and their parents did not show the presence of any mutation other than the C1735T transition in XP10PV and the TG1643–1644 deletion in XP26PV. The splice donor site of the alternative splice event is located in the 3' third of exon 8. This exon is unusually long (882 bp in length), which could make it unstable. The new splice site scores 83 using the system of Shapiro and Senapathy (23) , well above the minimum necessary to form a splice donor site. The point mutation in XP10PV and the two-base deletion in XP26PV are both located toward the 3' end of exon 8 (nt 991-1872) and could induce some change in the secondary structure of the mRNA, so that the cryptic splice site at position 1627 is used instead of the normal one at the beginning of intron 8. Because the two patients are homozygous, the presence of two different splice products indicates that both normal and cryptic splice donor sites are used.



View larger version (65K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Mutations in the XPC gene of the XP10PV and XP26PV families. Top, agarose gel electrophoresis of PCR amplification products of the XPC cDNA region 1180–1972, showing a shorter fragment, in addition to the normal-size fragment, in the XP family members. Middle, autoradiographs of sequencing gels of the short fragment, showing the deletion of the XPC cDNA region 1627–1872. Bottom, autoradiographs of sequencing gels, showing the C1735T and the TG1643–1644 deletion on the XPC genomic DNA of the XP10PV and XP26PV families, respectively.

 
In addition to the mutations relevant for the XP phenotype reported above, three missense mutations, namely a G1475A transition (Arg492His), a T1496C transition (Val499Ala), and an A2815C transversion (Lys939Gln), were observed either in the homozygous or heterozygous state in some patients (Table 3)Citation . These mutations are likely to be polymorphisms because several phenotypically normal subjects who belonged either to the general population or to families with XP-affected members were homozygous for these changes. Furthermore, we observed two silent mutations—C303T (Asp-101) and G2061A (Arg-687)—and two G to C transversions located in the 5' and 3' untranslated regions at position -27 and 2919, respectively.

Expression of XPC transcripts in the Italian patients and their parents were examined by Northern blot analysis (data not shown). Compared with cells from normal donors, no significant differences were observed in the XP-C parents or in patient XP13PV. In the other patients, the levels of XPC transcript were slightly reduced with values ranging between 60 and 80% of normal.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Although XP-C is one of the more common XP complementation groups, up until now the causative mutations have been determined for only six patients. We have now extended this database by analyzing an additional 12 patients including 8 who comprise all of the known Italian XP-Cs. The results reported in previous publications (12 , 13) and in our work are summarized in Fig. 6Citation . The mutations are distributed across the gene, with no indication of any hotspots or founder effects. Excluding the five cases analyzed only at the cDNA level (12) , 10 of the 13 remaining patients are homozygotes for the mutated XPC alleles, which suggests that they were all born from consanguineous marriages although consanguinity has been reported in the family histories of only XP9PV and XP18PV. The same inactivating mutations were found in XP12PV, XP18PV, and XP19PV (the loss of the C residue at position 128); in XP13PV and XP5PV (the insertion of two A residues at position 321); and in XP4PA and XP26PV (deletion of the dinucleotide TG at position 1643–1644). However the analysis of the linkage relationship of inactivating mutations with polymorphisms showed that common alleles are shared only by XP12PV and XP18PV and by XP13PV and XP5PV.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. XPC protein and amino acid changes caused by the inactivating mutations found in 18 XP-C patients. The diagram shows the XPC protein with the hHR23B binding domain and the putative nuclear location signal {blacksquare}. The amino acid changes are shown boxed: black on white, XP-C cases reported in this study; white on gray, XP-C cases reported in Refs. 12 and 13 . The numbers 1 and 2 after the patient code, the different alleles; in the Italian patients (PV), 1, the paternal allele; 2, the maternal allele.

 
Mutation Pattern in XP-C Patients.
Different types and sites of changes in the XPC protein result in the XP phenotype. The majority of the mutations relevant for the pathological phenotype (15 of 20) are predicted to cause premature termination of the protein as a result of frameshifts (nine), nonsense mutations (three), insertion (one), deletions (one), or splicing abnormalities (one). In addition to these, it is likely that other mutations also result in a null product. For instance, the patients XP10PV and XP26PV showed two different XPC transcripts at the cDNA level, one with a large in-frame deletion corresponding to the 3' third of exon 8. This transcript with the internal deletion was not detected on Northern blots, nor did we observe any product on Western blots although the corresponding protein should contain the XPC region used to raise the antibodies. These findings indicate that the transcript with the internal deletion and the corresponding protein are either present in too low an amount to be detected or are unstable.

As well as indicating that XPC is not essential for cell proliferation and viability, the mutation pattern in the patients has enabled us to identify a few positions in the XPC protein that are important for its functionality, namely the amino acid residue 334, mutated in the patient XP1MI, and the region around the amino acid 690–699, containing the amino acid 690 changed in XP13PV, and the insertion of an amino acid at position 698 in XP8BE (our analysis indicates that the A2815C change, resulting in Lys939Gln, described as a second putative causative mutation in XP8BE by Li et al. (12) is in fact a polymorphism).

The mutations observed in the patients result from different events and include: (a) deletions and insertions in runs of identical bases presumably resulting from replication slippage; (b) C to T transition at CpG sites, as a consequence of the demethylation of 5-methylcytosine; and (c) mutations located in the splice sites or affecting the splicing indirectly by interfering with the stability of the transcript. This would be the case for the transcript with the deletion of nts 1627–1872, found in association with a normal-sized transcript containing the C1735T transition (XP10PV) or the TG1643–1644 deletion (XP26PV). These were the only inactivating changes observed at the genomic level in XP10PV and XP26PV family members. The presence of these mutations in the 3' end of the exon 8 may interfere with the normal splicing of this unusually long (882-nt) exon, leading to the partial activation of a cryptic donor site at position 1627 and to the appearance of a transcript in which the last 246 nts of exon 8 are lost [exon 8 ends at nt 1872, as indicated by analysis in our patients and in XP22BE (13) ].

Genotype-Phenotype Relation.
A preponderance of protein truncation mutations, as seen in XPC, has also been found in other nonessential DNA repair genes such as XPA (24, 25, 26) , ATM (27) , and, to a lesser extent, in CSB (28 , 29) . It raises the possibility that some missense mutations that cause minor structural XPC alterations might result in a milder clinical phenotype that would not be diagnosed as XP. Conversely, in the diagnosed cases, the lack of the XPC protein and the presence of a mutated protein both result in similar clinical phenotypes and confer the same degree of cellular sensitivity to UV light in terms of survival and UDS. Ten of the 12 XP-C cases reported in this study (the 8 Italian cases, XP4BR, and XP4RO) show the clinical features typically described in the XP-C group. As already mentioned, XP-C is a large group, but its pathological phenotype is rather homogeneous. The patients usually show skin and ocular symptoms, whereas mild mental retardation has been reported for only one case (XP1MI). Differences in the severity of skin disorders depend on age, climate, and life-style (essentially the protection from the sun). Accordingly, in the Italian cases, no skin tumors have been reported in the three youngest patients.

XP6BR is an unusual patient in that he survived to the age of 66 and his multiple melanomas regressed spontaneously. He was the only patient with a large deletion in the XPC gene, but this is unlikely to be related to his clinical features because, like most of the other patients, he did not express any XPC protein in his cells (the possibility that a small amount of partially functional XPC protein, below the limit of detection in our assays, can account for these features is not excluded). XP14BR is unique in that both the patient and her cells were extremely sensitive to ionizing radiation, but this feature is unrelated to the defect in the XPC gene, because transfection with the XPC gene corrects the UV sensitivity but not the ionizing radiation sensitivity.4

All of the fourteen XP-C patients examined show varying degrees of reduction in the XPC transcript level (Refs. 12 , 13 and "Results"). The only exception is represented by patient XP13PV, who carries the missense mutation Trp690Ser on his paternal allele. Accordingly, XP13PV was the only case of the 12 analyzed by us in which the XPC protein was present, although at lower than normal levels. As already mentioned, this does not result either in milder clinical features or in a less severe cellular response to UV.

Predominant Expression of the Normal XPC Allele in Heterozygotes.
In the 13 cell strains from heterozygous XP-C parents, the transcript and protein levels were in the normal range. However, when we analyzed the XPC cDNA from the parents by using standard amplification conditions, we were unable to detect the mutations found in the patients in any of the cases except the father of XP13PV. This indicates that, with this one exception, the expression of the mutant RNA in heterozygotes is much lower than that of the normal RNA. The finding that noncoding mRNAs that carry nonsense codons are unstable is not unprecedented (for a recent review, see Ref. 30 ). However the detection of normal levels of XPC transcript on Northern blots suggests that, in heterozygous carriers of XPC mutations: (a) the level of expression of the mutated allele is lower than that of the same mutated allele in the affected progeny; and (b) the expression of the normal allele predominates and compensates for that of the mutated XPC allele.

This may imply the existence of a possible mechanism of regulation of the transcript level, which is perhaps not so unexpected considering the biological role of the XPC protein (for recent reviews, see Refs. 1 , 31 ). The XPC protein is indispensable during the initial phases of GGR—the NER subpathway that repairs the damage on the nontranscribed strand of active genes and in the inactive regions of the genome. Sugasawa et al. (10) have recently termed XPC "the initiator of GGR." In association with hHR23B, XPC initiates GGR by sensing and binding to lesions and recruiting the other components of the repair apparatus. Several lines of evidence indicate that XPC is dispensable only for the repair of lesions that induce a large distortion in the DNA structure, such as an artificial cholesterol DNA adduct or damage in an "open structure" (32) . It is also not required for TCR, in which the RNA polymerase, blocked at the lesion site, serves as a damage-recognition signal. Besides being absolutely required early in the DNA damage recognition step (i.e., the limiting step of the overall process), XPC is the limiting subunit of the XPC-hHR23B complex. In vitro, hHR23B can be replaced by substituting hHR23A, the second human homologue of the yeast NER factor Rad 23, in binding and stimulating XPC activity (33, 34, 35) . In vivo, hHR23B and hHR23A are both much more abundant than XPC and mostly exist in a free form in the cells (8 , 36) . These observations suggest that it may well be that, in the presence of only one normal XPC allele, the rate of XPC transcription or the stability of the transcript is somehow up-regulated to ensure the proper and efficient functioning of GGR.

In conclusion, as well as identifying a few positions in the XPC protein that are important for its function, the results of our analysis indicate that the inactivating mutations in the XP-C patients are distributed across the gene, with no indication of any hotspots or founder effects, and mainly result in truncated proteins. This implies that XPC is not essential for cell proliferation and viabilility. In addition, we have demonstrated that, in the heterozygous carriers of XPC mutations, the expression of the normal allele predominates and compensates for that of the mutated XPC allele, which suggests the existence of a possible mechanism for monitoring the amount of the protein.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We are grateful to Drs. E. Berardesca (Clinica Dermatologica, University of Pavia), P. Getti (Clinica Dermatologica, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy), G. Grosso (Clinica Dermatologica, University of Padova, Padova, Italy), V. Nazzaro (Clinica Dermatologica, University of Milan, Milan, Italy), and G. Zambruno (Istituto Dermopatico dell’Immacolata, Rome, Italy) for providing us with biopsy and clinical details on the Italian XP patients; to Drs. P. van der Spek (Erasmus Medical Centre of Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands) and J. M. Egly (Institut de Genetique et de Biologie Moleculaire et Cellulaire, Strasbourg, France) for providing us with anti-XPC and anti-p62 antibodies; and to Dr. R. Legerski for information concerning the genomic structure of the XPC gene.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro Grant (to M. S.), by EC Human Capital and Mobility Grant CHRX-CT94-0443 (to M. S. and A. R. L.), and by EC contract QLG1-1999-00181. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Istituto di Genetica Biochimica ed Evoluzionistica CNR, via Abbiategrasso 207, 27100 Pavia, Italy. Phone: 39-0382-546330; Fax: 39-0382-422286; E-mail: stefanini{at}igbe.pv.cnr.it Back

3 The abbreviations used are: NER, nucleotide excision repair; TCR, transcription-coupled repair; GGR, global genome repair; XP, xeroderma pigmentosum; UDS, unscheduled DNA synthesis; nt, nucleotide. Back

4 C. Arlett et al., unpublished results. Back

Received 9/23/99. Accepted 2/ 2/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. de Laat W. L., Jaspers N. G. J., Hoeijmakers J. H. J. Molecular mechanism of nucleotide excision repair. Genes Dev., 13: 768-785, 1999.[Free Full Text]
  2. Kraemer K. H., Lee M. M., Scotto J. Xeroderma pigmentosum. Cutaneous, ocular and neurologic abnormalities in 830 published cases. Arch. Dermatol., 123: 241-250, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Bootsma, D., Kraemer, K. H., Cleaver, J., and Hoeijmakers, J. H. J. Nucleotide excision repair syndromes: xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy. In: B. Vogelstein and K. W. Kinzler (eds.), The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer, pp 245–274. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998.
  4. Kantor G. J., Barsalou L. S., Hanawalt P. C. Selective repair of specific chromatin domains in UV-irradiated cells from xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C. Mutat. Res., 235: 171-180, 1990.[Medline]
  5. Venema J., van Hoffen A., Dorcagi V., Natarajan A. T., van Zeeland A. A., Mullenders L. H. F. XP complementation group C cells remove pyrimidine dimers selectively from the transcribed strand of active genes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 11: 4128-4134, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. van Hoffen A., Venema J., Meschini R., van Zeeland A. A., Mullenders L. H. F. Transcription-coupled repair removes both cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6–4 photoproducts with equal efficiency and in a sequential way from transcribed DNA in xeroderma pigmentosum group C fibroblast. EMBO J., 14: 360-367, 1995.[Medline]
  7. Legerski R. J., Peterson C. A. Expression cloning of a human DNA repair gene: xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C. Nature (Lond.), 359: 70-73, 1992.[Medline]
  8. Masutani C., Sugasawa K., Yanagisawa J., Sonoyama M. U., Enomoto T., Takio K., Tanaka K., van der Spek P., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H., Hanaoka F. Purification and cloning of a nucleotide excision repair complex involving the xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein and a human homologue of yeast RAD23. EMBO J., 13: 1831-1843, 1994.[Medline]
  9. Li L., Peterson C. A., Legerski R. J. Sequence of the mouse XPC cDNA and genomic structure of the human XPC gene. Nucleic Acids Res., 24: 1026-1028, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sugasawa K., Ng J. M. Y., Masutani C., Iwai S., van der Speck P. J., Eker A. P. M., Hanaoka F., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H. J. Xeroderma pigmentosum group C protein complex is the initiator of global genome nucleotide excision repair. Mol. Cell, 2: 223-232, 1998.[Medline]
  11. Wakasugi M., Sancar A. Assembly, subunit composition, and footprint of human DNA repair excision nuclease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 6669-6674, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Li L., Bales E. S., Peterson C. A., Legerski R. J. Characterization of molecular defect in xeroderma pigmentosum group C. Nat. Genet., 5: 413-417, 1993.[Medline]
  13. Khan S. G., Levy H. L., Legerski R., Quackenbush E., Reardon J. T., Emmert S., Sancar A., Li L., Schneider T. D., Cleaver J. E., Kraemer K. H. Xeroderma pigmentosum group C splice mutation associated with autism and hypoglycinemia. J. Investig. Dermatol., 111: 791-796, 1998.[Medline]
  14. Lehmann A. R., Stevens S. A rapid procedure for measurement of DNA repair in human fibroblasts and for complementation analysis of xeroderma pigmentosum cells. Mutat. Res., 69: 177-190, 1980.[Medline]
  15. de Weerd-Kastelein E. A., Keijzer W., Bootsma D. Genetic heterogeneity of xeroderma pigmentosum demonstrated by somatic cell hybridation. Nature (Lond.), 238: 80-83, 1972.
  16. Anstey A. V., Arlett C. F., Cole J., Norris P. G., Hamblin A. S., Limb G. A., Lehmann A. R., Wilkinson J. D., Turner M. Long-term survival and preservation of natural killer cell activity in a xeroderma pigmentosum patient with spontaneous regression and multiple deposits of malignant melanoma. Br. J. Dermatol., 125: 272-287, 1991.[Medline]
  17. Stefanini M., Giliani S., Nardo T., Marinoni S., Nazzaro V., Rizzo R., Trevisan G. DNA repair investigations in nine Italian patients affected by trichothiodystrophy. Mutat. Res., 273: 119-125, 1992.[Medline]
  18. Stefanini M., Lagomarsini P., Giliani S., Nardo T., Botta E., Peserico A., Kleijer W. J., Lehmann A. R., Sarasin A. Genetic heterogeneity of excision repair defect associated with trichothiodystrophy. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 1101-1105, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Shah G. M., Poirier D., Duchaine C., Brochu G., Desnoyers S., Lagueux J., Verreault A., Hoflack J. C., Kirkland J. B., Poirier G. G. Methods for biochemical study of poly(ADP-ribose) metabolism in vitro and in vivo. Anal. Biochem., 227: 1-13, 1995.[Medline]
  20. Rost B., Sander C. Prediction of protein structure at better than 70% accuracy. J. Mol. Biol., 232: 584-599, 1993.[Medline]
  21. Rost B., Sander C. Combining evolutionary information and neural networks to predict protein secondary structure. Proteins, 19: 55-72, 1994.[Medline]
  22. Rost B., Sander C., Schneider R. PHD-an automatic mail server for protein secondary structure prediction. Comput. Appl. Biosci., 10: 53-60, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Shapiro M. B., Senapthy P. RNA splice junctions of different classes of eukaryotes: sequence statistics and functional implication in gene expression. Nucleic Acids Res., 15: 7155-7174, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Sato, M., Nishigori, C., Yagi, T., and Takebe, H. Aberrant splicing and truncated-protein expression due to a newly identified XPA gene mutation. Mutat. Res., 362: 199–220, 81996.
  25. Kuraoka I., Morita E. H., Saijo M., Matsuda T., Morikawa K., Shirakawa M., Tanaka K. Identification of a damaged-DNA binding domain of the XPA protein. Mutat. Res., 362: 87-95, 1996.[Medline]
  26. States J. C., McDuffie E. R., Myrand S. P., McDowell M., Cleaver J. E. Distribution of mutations in the human xeroderma pigmentosum group A gene and their relationships to the functional regions of the DNA damage recognition protein. Hum. Mutat., 12: 103-113, 1998.[Medline]
  27. Rotman G., Shiloh Y. ATM: from gene to function. Hum. Mol. Genet., 7: 1555-1563, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Mallery D. L., Tanganelli B., Colella S., Steingrimsdottir H., van Gool A. J., Troelstra C., Stefanini M., Lehmann A. R. Molecular analysis of mutations in the CSB (ERCC6) gene in patients with Cockayne syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 62: 77-85, 1998.[Medline]
  29. Colella S., Nardo T., Mallery D., Borrone C., Ricci R., Ruffa G., Lehmann A. R., Stefanini M. Alterations in the CSB gene in three Italian patients with the severe form of Cockayne Syndrome (CS) but without clinical photosensitivity. Hum. Mol. Genet., 8: 935-941, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Culbertson M. R. RNA surveillance. Unforeseen consequences for gene expression, inherited genetic disorders and cancer. Trends Genet., 15: 74-79, 1999.[Medline]
  31. Wood R. D. DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells. Biochimie (Paris), 81: 39-44, 1999.[Medline]
  32. Mu D., Sancar A. Model for XPC-indipendent transcription-coupled repair of pyrimidine dimers in human. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 7570-7573, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Li L., Lu X., Peterson C. A., Legerski R. J. XPC interacts with both HHR23B and HHR23A in vivo. Mutat. Res., 383: 197-203, 1997.[Medline]
  34. Sugasawa K., Masutani C., Uchida A., Maekawa T., van der Spek P. J., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H. J., Hanaoka F. HHR23B, a human Rad23 homolog, stimulates XPC protein in nucleotide excision repair in vitro. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 4852-4861, 1996.[Abstract]
  35. Sugasawa K., Ng J. M. Y., Masutani C., Maekawa T., Uchida A., van der Spek P. J., Eker A. P. M., Rademakers S., Visser C., Aboussekhra A., Wood R. D., Hanaoka F., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H. J. Two human homologs of Rad23 are functionally interchangeable in complex formation and stimulation of XPC repair activity. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 6924-6931, 1997.[Abstract]
  36. van der Spek P. J., Eker A. P. M., Rademakers S., Visser C., Sugasawa K., Masutani C., Hanaoka F., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H. J. XPC and human homologs of RAD23: intracellular localization and relationship to other nucleotide excision repair complexes. Nucleic Acids Res., 24: 2551-2559, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Nuzzo F., Lagomarsini P., Casati A., Giorgi R., Berardesca E., Stefanini M. Clonal chromosome rearrangements in a fibroblast strain from a patient affected by xeroderma pigmentosum (complementation group C). Mutat. Res., 219: 209-215, 1989.[Medline]
  38. Salob S. P., Webb D. K. H., Atherton D. J. A child with xeroderma pigmentosum and bone marrow failure. Br. J. Dermatol., 126: 372-374, 1992.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
B. M. Bernardes de Jesus, M. Bjoras, F. Coin, and J. M. Egly
Dissection of the Molecular Defects Caused by Pathogenic Mutations in the DNA Repair Factor XPC
Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2008; 28(23): 7225 - 7235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
D. Hoogstraten, S. Bergink, J. M. Y. Ng, V. H. M. Verbiest, M. S. Luijsterburg, B. Geverts, A. Raams, C. Dinant, J. H. J. Hoeijmakers, W. Vermeulen, et al.
Versatile DNA damage detection by the global genome nucleotide excision repair protein XPC
J. Cell Sci., September 1, 2008; 121(17): 2850 - 2859.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C F Arlett, M H L Green, P B Rogers, A R Lehmann, and P N Plowman
Minimal ionizing radiation sensitivity in a large cohort of xeroderma pigmentosum fibroblasts
Br. J. Radiol., January 1, 2008; 81(961): 51 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
G. Yasuda, R. Nishi, E. Watanabe, T. Mori, S. Iwai, D. Orioli, M. Stefanini, F. Hanaoka, and K. Sugasawa
In Vivo Destabilization and Functional Defects of the Xeroderma Pigmentosum C Protein Caused by a Pathogenic Missense Mutation
Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2007; 27(19): 6606 - 6614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
F. Marini, T. Nardo, M. Giannattasio, M. Minuzzo, M. Stefanini, P. Plevani, and M. M. Falconi
DNA nucleotide excision repair-dependent signaling to checkpoint activation
PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17325 - 17330.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
C F Arlett, P N Plowman, P B Rogers, C N Parris, F Abbaszadeh, M H L Green, T J McMillan, C Bush, N Foray, and A R Lehmann
Clinical and cellular ionizing radiation sensitivity in a patient with xeroderma pigmentosum.
Br. J. Radiol., June 1, 2006; 79(942): 510 - 517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. G. Khan, K.-S. Oh, T. Shahlavi, T. Ueda, D. B. Busch, H. Inui, S. Emmert, K. Imoto, V. Muniz-Medina, C. C. Baker, et al.
Reduced XPC DNA repair gene mRNA levels in clinically normal parents of xeroderma pigmentosum patients
Carcinogenesis, January 1, 2006; 27(1): 84 - 94.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. D'Errico, M. Teson, A. Calcagnile, T. Nardo, N. De Luca, C. Lazzari, S. Soddu, G. Zambruno, M. Stefanini, and E. Dogliotti
Differential Role of Transcription-Coupled Repair in UVB-Induced Response of Human Fibroblasts and Keratinocytes
Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 65(2): 432 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
S. G. Khan, A. Metin, E. Gozukara, H. Inui, T. Shahlavi, V. Muniz-Medina, C. C. Baker, T. Ueda, J. R. Aiken, T. D. Schneider, et al.
Two essential splice lariat branchpoint sequences in one intron in a xeroderma pigmentosum DNA repair gene: mutations result in reduced XPC mRNA levels that correlate with cancer risk
Hum. Mol. Genet., February 1, 2004; 13(3): 343 - 352.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
V. Rapic-Otrin, V. Navazza, T. Nardo, E. Botta, M. McLenigan, D. C. Bisi, A. S. Levine, and M. Stefanini
True XP group E patients have a defective UV-damaged DNA binding protein complex and mutations in DDB2 which reveal the functional domains of its p48 product
Hum. Mol. Genet., July 1, 2003; 12(13): 1507 - 1522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
V. Anantharaman, E. V. Koonin, and L. Aravind
Peptide-N-glycanases and DNA repair proteins, Xp-C/Rad4, are, respectively, active and inactivated enzymes sharing a common transglutaminase fold
Hum. Mol. Genet., August 1, 2001; 10(16): 1627 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. G. Khan, E.J. Metter, R. E. Tarone, V. A. Bohr, L. Grossman, M. Hedayati, S. J. Bale, S. Emmert, and K. H. Kraemer
A new xeroderma pigmentosum group C poly(AT) insertion/deletion polymorphism
Carcinogenesis, October 1, 2000; 21(10): 1821 - 1825.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chavanne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chavanne, F.
Right arrow Articles by Stefanini, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online