Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kensler, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kensler, T. W.
[Cancer Research 61, 103-109, January 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Carcinogenesis

Protection against 2-Hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine Cytotoxicity and DNA Adduct Formation in Human Prostate by Glutathione S-Transferase P11

Chad P. Nelson, La Creis R. Kidd, Jurga Sauvageot, William B. Isaacs, Angelo M. De Marzo, John D. Groopman, William G. Nelson and Thomas W. Kensler2

Department of Environmental Health Sciences [C. P. N., L. R. K., J. D. G., T. W. K.], Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, and Departments of Oncology [J. S., W. B. I., W. G. N., J. D. G., T. W. K.], Urology [J. S., W. B. I., W. G. N.], Pathology [A. M. D.], Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences [W. G. N., T. W. K.], and Medicine [W. G. N.], Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21287


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The prostate has been identified as a target for 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP)-induced carcinogenesis. Humans are exposed to PhIP through ingestion of well-done cooked meats, and there is evidence from epidemiological studies that implicates red meat consumption in prostate carcinogenesis. The {alpha} and {pi} class isoforms of glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) have been shown to inhibit adduction of activated PhIP metabolites to DNA in cell-free systems. In humans, silencing of GST {pi} (GSTP1) through CpG island hypermethylation is found in nearly all prostate carcinomas and is believed to be an early event in prostate carcinogenesis. We hypothesized that suppressed GSTP1 expression in prostate cells would increase their vulnerability to cytotoxicity and DNA adduct formation mediated by activated PhIP metabolites. To test this hypothesis, the human prostate adenocarcinoma cell line, LNCaP, which contains a silenced GSTP1 gene, was genetically modified to constitutively express high levels of GSTP1. Both LNCaP and LNCaP-GSTP1 cells exposed to N-OH-PhIP, but not parent PhIP, for 24 h showed a dose-dependent decrease in cell viability. GSTP1-overexpressing cells had LC50s 30–40% higher than cells transfected with the vector alone. PhIP-DNA adducts isolated from LNCaP-derived cells and primary human prostate tissue cultures exposed to N-OH-PhIP were analyzed by liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry. Primary cultures of human prostate tissue and LNCaP-GSTP1 cells had ~50% lower adduct levels than parental LNCaP and vector control cells. Bioactivation assays using LNCaP cytosols showed that enzymatic activation of N-OH-PhIP to a DNA binding species was dependent on ATP and could be inhibited by recombinant human GSTP1 in the presence of glutathione. This evidence confirms that N-OH-PhIP can be bioactivated to a DNA binding species in human prostate and human prostate-derived cells. These observations provide the basis for using LNCaP and LNCaP-GSTP1 cells as a model system for studying the role of this enzyme in protection against N-OH-PhIP induced DNA damage in prostate carcinogenesis. Loss of GSTP1 expression in human prostate may, therefore, enhance its susceptibility to carcinogenic insult by compounds such as N-OH-PhIP. Conversely, induction of GSTs in early-stage prostate carcinogenesis may be a useful protective strategy.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed lethal cancer in North American men, the second leading cause of cancer death, and has become a major health issue for men in the Western world. In the United States, >180,000 new cases and >31,000 deaths occur annually (1) . The etiology of prostate cancer is still largely unknown; however, epidemiological evidence shows strong associations with dietary fat intake and red meat consumption (2) . Although fat is believed to be the major component in red meat responsible for its observed association with prostate cancer, other compounds present in meats may also contribute to prostate carcinogenesis.

Heterocyclic amines are pyrolysis products that have been isolated from cooked fish and meat and have been shown to be highly mutagenic in the Ames assay and are carcinogenic in rodents. PhIP,3 the most abundant of the mutagenic heterocyclic amines found in cooked meats, has been shown to have the highest carcinogenic potential of these compounds to humans and has also been detected in cigarette smoke condensate (3 , 4) . Initial long-term dietary studies involving PhIP revealed it to be carcinogenic to the colon, mammary gland, and lymphoid system in rodents (5 , 6) . Evaluation of rat prostate tissues from the original mammary and colon carcinogenesis study has also implicated PhIP in the development of prostate cancer (7) . Moreover, feeding of PhIP to lacI transgenic mice indicates that PhIP is a powerful prostate mutagen (8) . The collective findings of high incidences of lesions and carcinomas of the ventral prostate along with high levels of PhIP-DNA adduct formation and mutagenesis in the rat prostate suggest that PhIP could be an important factor in the development of human prostate cancer.

Bioactivation of PhIP to a DNA binding species in target tissues is believed to play a major role in its carcinogenicity. N-Hydroxylation of PhIP by cytochrome P-450s (primarily CYP1A2) in the liver is an obligatory step in the pathway leading to DNA adduct formation. Subsequent esterification by NATs, STs, or kinases has been shown to lead to the formation of a major adduct at the C8 of 2'dG (reviewed in Ref. 9 ). Cell-free studies have shown that GSTs can inhibit the binding of N-acetoxy-PhIP to calf thymus DNA by as much as 90% (10) . GSTP1, encoding the major GST isoform expressed in normal human prostate, is silenced by CpG island hypermethylation in nearly all prostate tumors and may be an early target for somatic alteration in multistep prostate carcinogenesis (11) . This study sought to assess the impact of GSTP1 in prostate-derived cells on protection against cytotoxicity and DNA adduct formation by the prostate carcinogen, PhIP.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals.
The following chemicals were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO): calf thymus DNA, 2'dG, acetic anhydride, BSA, MTT, CDNB, ECA, GSH, AcCoA, PAPS, ATP, and DMSO. N-hydroxy-PhIP was obtained from the National Cancer Institute Chemical Carcinogen Reference Repository (Kansas City, MO). Nuclease P1 was obtained from ICN Pharmaceuticals (Costa Mesa, CA). Alkaline phosphatase was obtained from Boehringer Mannheim (Indianapolis, IN). [15N5]-2'dG was obtained from Cambridge Isotope Laboratories (Andover, MA). All other chemicals were reagent grade unless specified otherwise.

Human Prostate Tissue and Cell Lines.
Grossly normal human prostatic tissues, opposite neoplastic prostate, were dissected from resection specimens obtained from men (age range, 51–67 years) treated for prostatic carcinoma by radical prostatectomy at The Johns Hopkins Hospital (Baltimore, MD). Human prostate tissues used for enzyme activity assays and background adduct analysis were frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C, whereas tissues used for carcinogen exposure were divided into three equivalent pieces of ~200 mg each and minced into ~2 x 2-mm sections with a scalpel. Minced tissues were then placed in six-well plates with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD), 100 units/ml penicillin, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 0.25µg/ml Fungizone. Tissues were preincubated for 1 h (37°C, 5% CO2) before the addition of fresh medium and carcinogen exposure.

The human prostatic carcinoma cell line LNCaP and GSTP1 cDNA were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Cells were cultured (37°C, 5% CO2) in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum. LNCaP cell lines stably transfected with a constitutively expressing GSTP1 vector, designated GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5, as will be described elsewhere,4 were cultured in LNCaP medium containing 200 µg/ml Geneticin to maintain selection. GSTP1 cDNA represented the most common GSTP1 allele type (Ile105 and Ala114).

Enzyme Assays.
LNCaP and LNCaP-GSTP1 cells were grown to confluency in 75-cm2 flasks, washed with PBS, trypsinized, harvested, centrifuged, resuspended in 1 ml PBS, and frozen at -80°C. The frozen cell suspensions were thawed and sonicated. The resultant homogenates were placed in Eppendorf tubes and centrifuged at 10,000 x g. In the case of human prostate samples, cytosols were prepared from fresh tissue, as described previously (10) . The supernatants were used for enzyme activity and protein determinations. GST activity, expressed as nmol/min/mg cytosolic protein, was measured using CDNB and ECA as substrates to determine overall GST activity and GSTP1-specific activity, respectively (12) . Because of limited amounts of human prostate tissues available and the known heterogeneity in GST isozyme expression, only CDNB conjugation activity was measured in those cytosols because this substrate gave a more comprehensive approximation of total GST activity. Protein concentrations were determined using BCA Protein Assay Reagent (Pierce, Rockford, IL) with BSA as the standard.

Western Blot Analysis.
Cytosolic protein (50 µg), isolated and determined as above for enzyme assays, was boiled for 15 min and resolved on a 12% SDS polyacrylamide gel. After blotting, the membrane was blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline containing 0.1% Tween 20, followed by a 1-h incubation with rabbit antihuman-GSTP1 serum (1:1000; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA). The secondary horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat antirabbit IgG (1:1000) was added for 1 h. The GSTP1 protein was visualized using the supersignal chemiluminescent substrate of Pierce (Rockford, IL). Recombinant human GSTP1 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA) was boiled and loaded as a positive control and comigrated with GSTP1 protein isolated from LNCaP cells stably transfected with the GSTP1-expressing vector.

Cytotoxicity Assay.
The colorimetric MTT assay measures the activity of various dehydrogenase enzymes in active mitochondria in living cells and has a linear relationship with cell number (13) . Approximately 1 x 104 cells/well were seeded in 96-well plates and treated 72 h later with graded concentrations of PhIP or N-OH-PhIP using DMSO:ethanol (4:1) as the vehicle at a final concentration of 0.1%. After 24 h, the carcinogen was removed, and the plates of cells were washed with PBS. Medium was added back to the plates, and 50 µl of MTT (2 mg/ml) in PBS were then incubated with the cells for 4 h at 37°C. The MTT and medium were removed, and DMSO was added to solubilize the cells. The absorbance of the formazan product was detected using a UV max Kinetic Microplate Reader (Molecular Devices, Menlo Park, CA) set at a wavelength of 505 nm.

Synthesis of Adduct Standards.
The 2'dG-C8 adduct of PhIP was synthesized by modifying a method described previously (14) . Briefly, 100 nmol of N-OH-PhIP in DMSO:ethanol (4:1) was reacted with 1 µl of acetic anhydride on an ice-salt bath for 15 min under argon, resulting in the formation of N-acetoxy-PhIP. The reaction mixture was then added to a 0.9-ml PBS solution containing 2.4 mg of 2'dG and 0.4 mg of BSA (added to enhance the stability of N-acetoxy-PhIP in solution, thereby increasing the yield of the end product) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min in a shaking Eppendorf warmer. The protein was then precipitated out using 2 volumes of ethanol and centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 10 min. The synthesized 2'dG-C8-PhIP adduct was passed through a Sep pak and purified by high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously (14) . The [15N5]-adduct was synthesized using the aforementioned methodology; however [15N5]-2'dG was substituted for 2'dG. Purified standards were redissolved in DMSO:ethanol (4:1), quantitated spectrophotometrically, and stored at -80°C.

DNA Adduction and Isolation.
LNCaP and LNCaP-GSTP1 cells (1 x 106) were plated in 75-cm2 flasks and grown to ~75% confluence. Cells were then exposed to 20 µM N-OH-PhIP or DMSO:ethanol (4:1) vehicle in fresh medium for 3 h. After the 3-h exposure, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS, trypsinized, harvested, centrifuged, washed again with ice-cold PBS, and then frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C until DNA isolation. Human prostate used for N-OH-PhIP incubations were prepared and cultured as described above. After the 3-h N-OH-PhIP exposure, the tissues were centrifuged, washed twice with ice-cold PBS, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80°C until DNA isolation. For DNA isolation, cells or tissues were thawed and homogenized in an ice-cold Teflon glass homogenizer, and DNA was isolated using an A.S.A.P. Genomic DNA Isolation kit (Boehringer Mannheim, Indianapolis, IN). DNA samples were washed twice with 70% ethanol, resuspended in 30 mM sodium acetate/1 mM zinc sulfate buffer (pH 5.3), and quantitated by measuring the absorbance at 260 nm, assuming 1 absorbance unit = 50 µg/ml double-stranded DNA (A260/A280 ratios, 1.7–1.9). DNA (~100 µg) from each sample was then digested with 10 units of nuclease P1 at 70°C for 2 h, followed by 10 units of alkaline phosphatase at 70°C for 2 h. Complete digestion to the resulting nucleoside bases was determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with absorbance monitoring at 260 nm. The [15N5]-adduct standard (500 pg in methanol) was added to each sample after the addition of 2 volumes of ethanol and centrifugation to precipitate out the protein. The supernatants were evaporated to dryness in a rotary evaporator and redissolved in 50 µl of methanol prior to LC/ESI-MS analysis.

LC/ESI-MS Analysis.
Mass spectral data were acquired on an LCQ (Thermoquest Corp., San Jose, CA) quadrupole ion trap mass analyzer equipped with an elecrospray probe coupled to a Thermal Systems Products liquid chromatography system, which consisted of a quaternary pump, an autosampler, and a variable wavelength UV detector. An ODS J-sphere M-80 column (2 x 250 mm; YMC, Inc., Wilmington, NC) heated to 45°C was used for sample separation. The mobile phase was as follows: A, mass spectrometry grade H2O containing 0.1% formic acid; B, mass spectrometry grade methanol containing 0.1% formic acid. The LC conditions were as follows: flow rate, 0.2 ml/min; a linear gradient from 0% B to 100% B in 10 min, isocratic B to 13 min, and linear to 0% B by 13.5 min to reset at starting conditions. Collision-induced dissociation and selected reaction monitoring were optimized for analysis of the 2'dG-C8-PhIP adduct, and a standard curve was generated based on the signal area of known concentrations. Recovery of the [15N5]-internal standard was also monitored in the same chromatographic run for each sample and was highly variable as a result of sample preparation and reconstitution in methanol. 2'dG was analyzed by LC/ESI-MS under the same chromatographic and mass spectral conditions. Data are represented as pmol 2'dG-C8-PhIP (corrected for recovery of internal standard) per µmol 2'dG, with a detection limit of 0.7 pmol adduct per µmol 2'dG (equivalent to ~2 adducts/107 nucleotides).

Measurement of Cellular AcCoA and ATP in LNCaP Cells.
LNCaP cells in log growth were assayed for AcCoA by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography as described previously (15) . LNCaP cells at 1.5 x 105 cells/ml were plated into 96-well plates with each well containing 0.2 ml of cell suspension. Forty-eight h later, cellular ATP content was determined using a luciferin-luciferase ATP assay kit (bioluminescent somatic cell assay kit; Sigma) as described previously (16) .

Cytosolic Activation and Inhibition Assays.
Assays were conducted to determine relative contributions of NAT, ST, and ATP-dependent kinase(s) in the bioactivation of N-OH-PhIP to a DNA binding species by LNCaP cytosols using enzyme-specific cofactors as described previously, with modifications (17) , and to assess the ability of rhGSTP1 (Calbiochem, San Diego, CA), allele type unknown, to inhibit bioactivation. Covalent binding of N-OH-PhIP (20 µM) to calf thymus DNA (200 mg) in the presence or absence of PAPS (0.2 mM), AcCoA (1 mM), or ATP (1 mM) was measured as described below. Assay mixtures, containing 0.5 mg of either native or boiled cytosolic protein, were incubated at 37°C for 30 min and stopped by the addition of 2 ml of cold lysis buffer from the DNA isolation kit. Experiments assessing the ability of GSTP1 to inhibit bioactivation of N-OH-PhIP contained 60 µg of the recombinant human protein in the presence or absence of GSH (3 mM). DNA samples were isolated using the A.S.A.P. Genomic DNA Isolation kit and processed for LC/ESI-MS analysis as described above.

Statistical Analyses.
Data were analyzed using either the Student’s t test or the paired Student’s t test procedure in SigmaPlot statistical computer software (Jandel Scientific, San Rafael, CA).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
GST Activity and Protein Expression in LNCaP and LNCaP-GSTP1 Cells.
Single clones of cells transfected to stably express GSTP1 (GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5) were assessed for GST activity and compared with parental LNCaP cells and vector control cells, LNCaP-Neo. Cytosols isolated from LNCaP and LNCaP-Neo cells had very low basal levels of GST activity, whereas GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5 both showed significantly higher overall conjugating activity with CDNB as substrate, 6.1- and 20.2-fold, respectively, compared with LNCaP-Neo (Fig. 1A)Citation . GSTP1-specific activity, determined using ECA as the substrate, was significantly higher in both GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5 cytosols, 7.5- and 20.5-fold, respectively, compared with LNCaP-Neo (Fig. 1B)Citation . Assessment of GSTP1 content in LNCaP, LNCaP-Neo, GSTP1-C1, and GSTP1-C5 cells by Western blot analysis indicates that LNCaP and LNCaP-Neo cells have essentially no expression of GSTP1 protein, whereas GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5 cells have progressively higher levels of protein expression that coincides with the activity assays (Fig. 1C)Citation . Western blot analysis for {alpha} class GST was weakly positive in LNCaP cells (data not shown) and may account for the basal level of GST activity in these cells.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. GST activity and GSTP1-specific protein expression in LNCaP and LNCaP cells stably transfected with a control vector (LNCaP-Neo) or a constitutively expressing GSTP1 vector (GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5). A, GST activity using CDNB as substrate (n = 3). Bars, SE. B, GST activity using ECA as substrate (n = 3). Bars, SE. *, P < 0.05 compared with LNCaP and LNCaP-Neo cells; Student’s t test. C, Western blot analysis of cytosols (50 µg of cytosolic protein) from indicated cell lines or rhGSTP1 using a rabbit antihuman-GSTP1-1 polyclonal antibody.

 
GST Activity and Detection in Human Prostate.
Overall GST activity, using CDNB as the substrate, in human prostate cytosols showed a range of values from 61 to 227 with a mean of 162 nmol/min/mg protein and were consistent with literature values (18) . This level of overall GST activity is comparable with the levels seen in the GSTP1-overexpressing cell line GSTP1-C1 (mean, 264 nmol/min/mg protein). However, immunohistochemical analysis of the human prostate samples indicated that at least three different isoforms ({alpha}, µ, and {pi}) of GST were expressed at varied levels in the epithelial cells of the peripheral zone (data not shown).

Cytotoxicity of N-OH-PhIP and PhIP in Parental LNCaP Cells and LNCaP Cells with Elevated GSTP1 Expression.
The MTT assay revealed that exposure to N-OH-PhIP (0–50 µM) for 24 h was cytotoxic to all four cell lines in a concentration-dependent manner (Fig. 2)Citation . Both clones of LNCaP-GSTP1 cells were more resistant to cytotoxicity compared with LNCaP or LNCaP-Neo cells. The concentration of N-OH-PhIP required to kill 50% of the cells (LC50) increased significantly by 34 and 40% in GSTP1-C1 and GSTP1-C5 cells, respectively, compared with LNCaP-Neo cells (P < 0.05, paired Student’s t test; Fig. 2Citation , inset). Exposure of LNCaP cells to PhIP for 24 h at concentrations as high as 100 µM showed no concentration-dependent cytotoxicity (Fig. 2)Citation .



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Overexpression of GSTP1 in LNCaP cells confers partial resistance to N-OH-PhIP cytotoxicity. LNCaP and stably transfected LNCaP cells were treated with designated concentrations of N-OH-PhIP or PhIP for 24 h prior to cell survival analysis by the MTT assay. Data points for N-OH-PhIP-exposed cells are average means from three independent experiments; bars, SE. Data points for LNCaP cells exposed to PhIP are average means from a single 96-well plate (n = 12 at each concentration). SE bars not shown were too small to be represented. •, LNCaP; {blacksquare}, LNCaP-Neo; {circ}, GSTP1-C1; {square}, GSTP1-C5 cells exposed to N-OH-PhIP; {blacktriangleup}, LNCaP cells exposed to PhIP. Inset, mean LC50s (n = 3) for all four cell lines exposed to N-OH-PhIP; bars, SE. *, P < 0.05 compared with LNCaP-Neo cells calculated by paired Student’s t test.

 
DNA Adduct Analysis of LNCaP-derived Cells and Human Prostate Exposed to N-OH-PhIP in Culture.
DNA samples isolated from human prostate primary cultures and LNCaP-derived cells exposed to 20 µM N-OH-PhIP were analyzed for the presence of 2'dG-C8-PhIP by LC/ESI-MS. This 2'dG-C8-PhIP adduct has been characterized previously by LC/ESI-MS (19) and is the predominant adduct seen in in vitro and in vivo systems. Under the LC/MS conditions described in "Materials and Methods," digested DNA from exposed tissues and cells contained a major peak that coeluted with synthesized 2'dG-C8-PhIP and [15N5]-adduct standards (Fig. 3)Citation . Although the LC/ESI-MS method developed was highly specific for the adducts measured, some minor peaks that did not correspond to the elution of known standards were observed in chromatographic runs. These minor peaks were also observed in some blank runs and in digested DNA samples form LNCaP cells exposed to vehicle alone. 2'dG-C8-PhIP formation, expressed as pmol per normal 2'dG (µmol) and corrected for the percentage of recovery of the internal standard, in LNCaP cells was concentration dependent over the range of 3–100 µM (data not shown). Shown in Fig. 4Citation , transfected cells that overexpressed GSTP1 had adduct levels nearly one-half the amount seen in parental LNCaP and LNCaP-Neo cells. 2'dG-C8-PhIP adduct levels in primary cultures of human prostate were on average 50% lower than levels seen in LNCaP or LNCaP-Neo cells. The human prostate tissues used for GST activity measurements and N-OH-PhIP exposure in culture were the same. No correlation between levels of 2'dG-C8-PhIP formation and GST activity or expression was observed. Human prostate tissues not exposed to N-OH-PhIP in culture had no detectable background levels of 2'dG-C8-PhIP. Moreover, treatment of LNCaP cells or primary human prostate tissues with 100 µM PhIP for up to 6 h also did not yield any detectable 2'dG-C8-PhIP.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Representative LC/ESI-MS chromatograms obtained for the PhIP-DNA adduct standards and digested DNA from LNCaP cells exposed to N-OH-PhIP. A, mass chromatogram of 250 pg of the 2'dG-C8-PhIP standard (structure shown) monitoring the m/z 490.1 -> m/z 374.3 transition in selected reaction monitoring mode. B, mass chromatogram of digested DNA from LNCaP cells exposed to 20 µM N-OH-PhIP for 3 h monitoring the m/z 490.1 -> m/z 374.3 transition in selected reaction monitoring mode. C, mass chromatogram of 100 pg of the [15N5]-2'dG-C8-PhIP internal standard (structure shown) monitoring the m/z 495.1 -> m/z 379.3 transition in selected reaction monitoring mode.

 


View larger version (26K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. DNA adduct formation in human prostate and human prostate-derived cells exposed to 20 µM N-OH-PhIP for 3 h (mean; n = 3; bars, SE). L, LNCaP; N, LNCaP-Neo; C1, GSTP1-C1; C5, GSTP1-C5. Numbers indicate prostate samples obtained from individual patients. Dashed line, mean value of adducts from all exposed human surgical samples. Student’s t test analysis: *, P < 0.05 compared with LNCaP cells or LNCaP-Neo cells.

 
Bioactivation of N-OH-PhIP by LNCaP Cytosol and Inhibition by GSTP1.
Assays were performed with cytosolic fractions of LNCaP cells to determine the possible pathways involved in bioactivation of N-OH-PhIP to a DNA binding species (Fig. 5A)Citation . Of the three major cofactors (PAPS, ATP, and AcCoA) used in these determinations, the only one that enhanced binding to calf thymus DNA, as determined by formation of 2'dG-C8-PhIP, compared with controls was ATP. Slightly higher binding, compared with control incubations with no cofactor, was seen in the presence of AcCoA, but these levels were also seen in the heat-inactivated cytosol control. The physiological levels of AcCoA and ATP measured in LNCaP cells were 6.1 ± 0.5 µM (mean ± SE; n = 3) and 1.8 ± 0.1 mM (mean ± SE; n = 5), respectively. Assay conditions that involved concentrations of AcCoA >100-fold over observed physiological levels did not significantly elevate the formation of 2'dG-C8-PhIP, whereas concentrations of ATP that were actually less than observed physiological levels produced significant adduct formation with native LNCaP cytosol. ATP-dependent 2'dG-C8-PhIP formation was significantly inhibited by GSH alone, but this inhibition was extended to near background levels by the addition of rhGSTP1 (Fig. 5B)Citation .



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Bioactivation of N-OH-PhIP to a DNA binding species by LNCaP cytosol and inhibition by GSTP1. A, activation assays in the presence of indicated cofactors and quantitation of adducts are described in "Materials and Methods." The results shown represent the means of triplicate experiments; bars, SE. a, P < 0.05 compared with boiled cytosol in the presence of ATP calculated by Student’s t test. B, inhibition of ATP-dependent activation of N-OH-PhIP in LNCaP cytosols by rhGSTP1. Cell-free assays and quantitation of adducts are described in "Materials and Methods." The results shown represent the means of triplicate experiments; bars, SE. Student’s t test analysis: b, P < 0.05 compared with native cytosol + ATP; c, P < 0.05 compared with native cytosol + ATP + GSH.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The prostate has been identified as a target for PhIP-induced carcinogenesis, DNA adduct formation, and mutagenesis in rodents (7 , 8) . The positive associations with prostate cancers and red meat consumption seen in epidemiological studies (2) support the assumption that heterocyclic amines, such as PhIP, may play a role in the etiology of human prostate cancer. Evidence presented here indicates that human prostate and human prostate-derived cells have the capacity to bioactivate N-OH-PhIP, but not PhIP, to cytotoxic and DNA-damaging specie(s). Kaderlik et al. (20) reported that i.v. administration of N-OH-PhIP to rats led to high levels of PhIP-DNA adducts in all of the extrahepatic tissues examined. This evidence indicates that N-OH-PhIP, believed to be formed primarily in the liver, is sufficiently stable to be transported through the circulation and further metabolized to a DNA-binding species in distal organs such as the prostate.

We have developed a very sensitive and highly specific LC/ESI-MS methodology for detecting and quantitating the major PhIP-DNA adduct, 2'dG-C8-PhIP, formed in in vivo and in vitro systems. No other DNA adducts were detected by LC/ESI-MS; however, it should be noted that the conditions were optimized for detecting the 2'dG-C8-PhIP adduct. This method was used to measure PhIP-DNA adduct formation in prostate-derived cells and in a cell-free system through bioactivation of N-OH-PHIP. Our data (Fig. 5A)Citation suggest that the pathway leading to DNA adduct formation in LNCaP cells involves ATP-dependent enzymes. One ATP-dependent enzyme believed to be involved in N-OH-PhIP activation is tRNA synthetase/kinase, but the evidence is inconclusive as to whether activation is attributable solely to the tRNA synthetase/kinase or to other kinases as well (17 , 21) . The highly reactive derivatives resulting from this ATP-dependent activation of N-OH-PhIP are believed to be either the N-prolyloxy or the N-phosphatyl esters at the exocyclic amino group. These ester moieties serve as leaving groups, giving rise to putative electrophilic arylnitrenium ion intermediates, which subsequently bind to the C8 position of guanine (9) . This ATP-dependent activation of N-OH-PhIP has been observed in various tissues of humans, rodents, and nonhuman primates (17 , 21 , 22) and may play a significant role in the susceptibility of extrahepatic tissues to heterocyclic amine-induced DNA adduct formation, particularly in tissues where NAT and ST activities are low. Activation of heterocyclic amines by NATs and STs has been demonstrated in cytosolic fractions isolated from human colon and mammary cells (21 , 23, 24, 25) . NAT-dependent O-acetylation of heterocyclic amines is believed to be an important factor in the susceptibility of the colon and mammary gland to heterocyclic amine-induced carcinogenesis (21 , 23 , 25) . There is recent evidence showing the presence of NAT mRNA in human prostate epithelium (26) , which may account for some activation of N-OH-PhIP in situ. However, Leff et al. (27) have shown that overexpression of human NAT2, the isoform with the highest relative capacity to convert N-OH-PhIP to a DNA-binding species (28) , specifically in the prostate of transgenic mice, does not enhance PhIP-DNA adduct formation in that tissue. This evidence, along with our findings, suggests that this ATP-dependent activation pathway may be very important in determining prostate-related toxicities in contrast to colonic and mammary tissues.

LNCaP cells, a well-characterized prostate adenocarcinoma cell line, serve as a model for understanding many aspects of prostatic epithelial cell biochemistry and molecular biology. These cells have an experimentally useful feature in that they possess a GSTP1 gene that has been silenced because of CpG island hypermethylation of the promoter region. This silencing, which occurs in >90% of prostatic carcinomas and is increased in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, may be an early genetic lesion that predisposes select cells to carcinogenic insult and may be useful as a biomarker of early-stage prostate carcinoma (11 , 29) . Restored expression of GSTP1 in LNCaP cells has allowed us to explore the ability of GSTP1 to protect these prostate-derived cells from toxicities associated with exposure to a potential human prostate carcinogen. Our results show that overexpression of GSTP1 in LNCaP cells does partially protect against cytotoxicity and DNA adduct formation caused by exposure to N-OH-PhIP. The observed cytotoxicity suggests, but does not definitively prove, that these prostate-derived cells express enzymes that can bioactivate N-OH-PhIP to an esterified form, which could in turn bind to cellular macromolecules and cause cell death. The relevance of this model system is further supported by the observation that 2'dG-C8-PhIP levels seen in human prostate surgical samples exposed to N-OH-PhIP at equivalent concentrations and time points are comparable with levels seen in GSTP1-overexpressing cells (Fig. 4)Citation . This feature not withstanding, there remain obvious difficulties in comparing data from prostate cancer cells grown in culture to prostate tissue that contains a heterogeneous population of cells. Differences in activation enzymes as well as detoxification enzymes (e.g., the varied expression of GST isoforms) between LNCaP cells and human prostate tissue could potentially affect the cytotoxicity and adduct formation caused by N-OH-PhIP. In fact, no correlation between levels of 2'dG-C8-PhIP formation and GST activity or GST expression in human prostate cultures was observed. Because of the heterogeneity of GST isozyme expression in any given human prostate tissue section, along with the possibility for differences in N-OH-PhIP activation, associations between DNA adduct formation and qualitative enzyme expression in individual tissues are difficult. Immunohistochemical staining of GSTP1-C1-overexpressing cells showed that there is very heterogeneous expression of the protein, with some cells expressing very high levels whereas others express either very low or intermediate levels,5 somewhat mimicking the in vivo situation. Although derived from clonal expansion of a single colony, heterogeneous expression of GSTP1 may be caused by differential regulation in individual cells.

A previous study has shown that several GST isoforms were able to inhibit DNA binding of N-acetoxy-PhIP (an ultimate DNA binding species) to calf thymus DNA by as much as 90% (10) . Specifically, GSTP1–1 was able to significantly inhibit binding by 30%. Our results confirm that GSTP1 can inhibit binding of activated PhIP metabolites to DNA in cellular and cell-free systems and that there may be biological relevance in the prevention of toxicities to the prostate. GSH, a highly abundant cellular nucleophile, alone was able to significantly inhibit ATP-dependent adduct formation in a cell-free system (Fig. 5B)Citation . This result could be attributable to nonenzymatic binding of GSH to the reactive intermediate(s) or to low levels of other GST isoforms (low levels of {alpha} class GST were detected by Western blot analysis) present in LNCaP cytosol binding to and inactivating the reactive intermediate(s). The mechanism of inactivation of N-esterified-PhIP intermediates has not yet been determined, but Lin et al. (10) demonstrated that the end products of a reaction mixture that contained N-acetoxy-PhIP, GST, and GSH were PhIP and oxidized glutathione. The stoichiometry of the end products, PhIP and oxidized glutathione, suggested that the reaction was not a simple redox reaction. There is evidence that a glutathione conjugate is formed, but that it is highly labile and degrades to form a 5-hydroxy-PhIP metabolite (30) . Our observations of nearly complete inhibition of ATP-dependent N-OH-PhIP-induced DNA adduct formation in a cell-free system by GSTP1 suggests that this GST isoform may have a higher substrate specificity for the ATP-dependent metabolite(s) of N-OH-PhIP versus N-acetoxy-PhIP, thus enhancing its ability to inhibit binding to DNA. Further studies should focus on determining the enzyme(s) responsible for producing the ultimate DNA binding species in prostate-derived cells as well as characterizing the structural properties of the activated metabolite(s). The effectiveness of other GST isoforms should also be assessed in their ability to inhibit the cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of activated PhIP metabolites in the prostate.

GSTs have been proposed to play a critical role in defending normal cells against electrophilic carcinogens. Inactivation of GSTP1 in prostate cells by promoter hypermethylation may lead to increased vulnerability to electrophilic carcinogens. We have demonstrated that restored GSTP1 expression in the prostate-derived cell line LNCaP can inhibit cytotoxicity and DNA adduct formation caused by a potential dietary carcinogen. The evidence presented leads to the possibility of strategies for the prevention of initial and cumulative DNA-damaging events caused by N-OH-PhIP and other similar compounds that may lead to multistage prostate carcinogenesis. A recent study by Montironi et al. (31) suggests that finasteride, a 5-{alpha}-reductase inhibitor currently used in a human prostate cancer prevention trial, may act as a GST{pi} inducer in human prostate. Induction of GSTs in the prostate by chemopreventive agents may therefore be a viable preventive strategy, either alone or in concert with other mechanisms. This line of reasoning may also help to explain the negative correlation of prostate cancer with high vegetable intake seen in epidemiological studies (2 , 32) , because these vegetables contain potent inducers of GSTs such as isothiocyanates (33) .


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Patricia Egner and Drs. James D. Brooks, Xiaohui S. Lin, Fred Kadlubar, and Theodore DeWeese for invaluable assistance and helpful discussions.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by NIH Grants CA44530, ES06052, ES03819, ES07141, and CA70126 and the Alexander and Margaret Stewart Trust. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Public Health, 615 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21205. Phone: (410) 955-4712. Fax: (410) 955-0116; E-mail: tkensler{at}jhsph.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: PhIP, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine; NAT, N-acetyltransferase; ST, sulfotransferase; 2'dG, 2'deoxyguanosine; GST, glutathione S-transferase; N-OH-PhIP, 2-hydroxyamino-PhIP; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide; CDNB, 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene; ECA, ethacrynic acid; GSH, reduced glutathione; AcCoA, acetyl CoA; PAPS, 3'-phosphoadenosine 5'-phosphosulfate; rhGSTP1, recombinant human GSTP1; LC/ESI-MS, liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization mass spectrometry; 2'dG-C8-PhIP, N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-PhIP. Back

4 Manuscript in preparation. Back

5 Unpublished data. Back

Received 3/ 2/00. Accepted 10/26/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Cancer Facts and Figures, 2000, p. 14. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society, 2000.
  2. Kolonel L. N. Nutrition and prostate cancer. Cancer Causes Control, 7: 83-94, 1996.[Medline]
  3. Layton D. W., Bogen K. T., Knize M. G., Hatch F. T., Johnson V. M., Felton J. S. Cancer risk of heterocyclic amines in cooked foods: an analysis and implications for research. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 16: 39-52, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Shimada T., Guengerich F. P. Activation of amino-{alpha}-carboline, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, and a copper phthalocyanine cellulose extract of cigarette smoke condensate by cytochrome P-450 enzymes in rat and human liver microsomes. Cancer Res., 51: 5284-5291, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Ito N., Hasegawa R., Sano M., Tamano S., Esumi H., Takayama S., Takashi S. A new colon and mammary carcinogen in cooked food, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP). Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 12: 1503-1506, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Esumi H., Ohgaki H., Kohzen E., Takayama S., Sugimura T. Induction of lymphoma in CDF1 mice by the food mutagen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. Jpn. J. of Cancer Res., 80: 1176-1178, 1989.
  7. Shirai T., Sano M., Tamano S., Takahashi S., Hirose M., Futakuchi M., Hasegawa R., Imaida K., Matsumoto K-I., Wakabayashi K., Sugimura T., Ito N. The prostate: a target for carcinogenicity of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) derived from cooked foods. Cancer Res., 57: 195-198, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Stuart G. R., Holcroft J., de Boer J. G., Glickman B. W. Prostate mutations in rats induced by the suspected human carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine. Cancer Res., 60: 266-268, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Schut H. A. J., Snyderwine E. G. DNA adducts of heterocyclic amine food mutagens: implications for mutagenesis and carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 353-368, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Lin D., Meyer D. J., Ketterer B., Lang N. P., Kadlubar F. F. Effects of human and rat glutathione S-transferases on the covalent DNA binding of the N-acetoxy derivatives of heterocyclic amine carcinogens in vitro: a possible mechanism of organ specificity in their carcinogenesis. Cancer Res., 54: 4920-4926, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Lee W-H., Isaacs W. B., Bova G. S., Nelson W. G. CG island methylation changes near the GSTP1 gene in prostatic carcinoma cells detected using the polymerase chain reaction: a new prostate cancer biomarker. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 6: 443-450, 1997.[Abstract]
  12. Habig W. H., Pabst M. J., Jakoby W. B. Glutathione S-transferases. The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem., 249: 7130-7139, 1974.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods, 65: 55-63, 1983.[Medline]
  14. Lin D., Kaderlik K. R., Turesky R. J., Miller D. W., Lay J., Jackson O., Kadlubar F. F. Identification of N-(deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine as the major adduct formed by the food-borne carcinogen, 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine, with DNA. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 5: 691-697, 1992.[Medline]
  15. Demoz A., Garras A., Asiedu D. K., Netteland B., Berge R. K. Rapid method for the separation and detection of tissue short-chain coenzyme A esters by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. B Biomed. Appl., 667: 148-152, 1995.[Medline]
  16. Zhu H., Li Y., Trush M. A. Characterization of benzo[a]pyrene quinone-induced toxicity to primary cultured bone marrow stromal cells from DBA/2 mice: potential role of mitochondrial dysfunction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 130: 108-120, 1995.[Medline]
  17. Lin D-X., Lang N. P., Kadlubar F. F. Species differences in the biotransformation of the food-borne carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine by hepatic microsomes and cytosols from humans, rats, and mice. Drug Metab. Dispos., 23: 518-524, 1995.[Abstract]
  18. Tew K. D., Clapper M. L., Greenberg R. E., Weese J. L., Hoffman S. J., Smith T. M. Glutathione S-transferases in human prostate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 926: 8-15, 1987.[Medline]
  19. Rindgen D., Turesky R. J., Vouros P. Determination of in vitro formed DNA adducts of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine using capillary liquid chromatography/electrospray ionization/tandem mass spectrometry. Chem. Res. Toxicol., 8: 1005-1013, 1995.[Medline]
  20. Kaderlik K. R., Minchin R. F., Mulder G. J., Ilett K. F., Daugaard-Jenson M., Teitel C. H., Kadlubar F. F. Metabolic activation pathway for the formation of DNA adducts of the carcinogen 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) in rat extrahepatic tissues. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 1703-1709, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Dubuisson J. G., Gaubatz J. W. Bioactivation of the proximal food mutagen 2-hydroxyamino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (N-OH-PhIP) to DNA-binding species by human mammary gland enzymes. Nutrition, 14: 683-686, 1998.[Medline]
  22. Davis C. D., Schut H. A. J., Snyderwine E. G. Enzymatic phase II activation of the N-hydroxylamines of IQ, MeIQx and PhIP by various organs of monkeys and rats. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 14: 2091-2096, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Turesky R. J., Lang N. P., Butler M. A., Teitel C. H., Kadlubar F. F. Metabolic activation of carcinogenic heterocyclic aromatic amines by human liver and colon. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 12: 1839-1845, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Lewis A. J., Walle U. K., King R. S., Kadlubar F. F., Falany C. N., Walle T. Bioactivation of the cooked food mutagen N-hydroxy-2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine by estrogen sulfotransferase in cultured human mammary epithelial cells. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 19: 2049-2053, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Sadrieh N., Davis C. D., Snyderwine E. G. N-Acetyltransferase expression and metabolic activation of the food-derived heterocyclic amines in the human mammary gland. Cancer Res., 56: 2683-2687, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Wang C. Y., Debiec-Rychter M., Schut H. A. J., Morse P., Jones R. F., Archer C., King C. M., Haas G. P. N-Acetyltransferase expression and DNA binding of N-hydroxyheterocyclic amines in human prostate epithelium. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 20: 1591-1595, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Leff M. A., Epstein P. N., Doll M. A., Fretland A. J., Devanaboyina U., Rustan T. D., Hein D. W. Prostate-specific human N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) expression in the mouse. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 290: 182-187, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Hein D. W., Rustan T. D., Ferguson R. J., Doll M. A., Gray K. Metabolic activation of aromatic and heterocyclic N-hydroxyarylamines by wild-type and mutant recombinant human NAT1 and NAT2 acetyltransferases. Arch. Toxicol., 68: 129-133, 1994.[Medline]
  29. Lee W-H., Morton R. A., Epstein J. I., Brooks J. D., Campbell P. A., Bova G. S., Hsieh W-S., Isaacs W. B., Nelson W. G. Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the {pi}-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostate carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 11733-11737, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Reistad R., Frandsen H., Grivas S., Alexander J. In vitro formation and degradation of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) protein adducts. Carcinogenesis (Lond.), 15: 2547-2552, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Montironi R., Mazzucchelli R., Pomante R., Thompson D., Duval da Silva V., Vaught L., Bartels P. H. Immunohistochemical expression of pi class glutathione S-transferase in the basal cell layer of benign prostate tissue following chronic treatment with finasteride. J. Clin. Pathol., 52: 350-354, 1999.[Abstract]
  32. Negri E., La Vecchia C., Franceschi S., D’Avanzo B., Parazzini F. Vegetable and fruit consumption and cancer risk. Int. J. Cancer, 48: 350-354, 1991.[Medline]
  33. Zhang Y., Talalay P., Cho C-G., Posner G. H. A major inducer of anticarcinogenic protective enzymes from broccoli: isolation and elucidation of structure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 89: 2399-2403, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
EndocrinologyHome page
W. G. Nelson, A. M. De Marzo, and S. Yegnasubramanian
Epigenetic Alterations in Human Prostate Cancers
Endocrinology, September 1, 2009; 150(9): 3991 - 4002.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
N. L. Nock, D. Tang, A. Rundle, C. Neslund-Dudas, A. T. Savera, C. H. Bock, K. G. Monaghan, A. Koprowski, N. Mitrache, J. J. Yang, et al.
Associations between Smoking, Polymorphisms in Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Metabolism and Conjugation Genes and PAH-DNA Adducts in Prostate Tumors Differ by Race
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2007; 16(6): 1236 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
D. Tang, J. J. Liu, A. Rundle, C. Neslund-Dudas, A. T. Savera, C. H. Bock, N. L. Nock, J. J. Yang, and B. A. Rybicki
Grilled Meat Consumption and PhIP-DNA Adducts in Prostate Carcinogenesis
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2007; 16(4): 803 - 808.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Nakai, W. G. Nelson, and A. M. De Marzo
The Dietary Charred Meat Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-Methyl-6-Phenylimidazo[4,5-b]Pyridine Acts as Both a Tumor Initiator and Promoter in the Rat Ventral Prostate
Cancer Res., February 1, 2007; 67(3): 1378 - 1384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J AndrolHome page
R. Obligacion, M. Murray, and I. Ramzan
Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters: Expression in the Human Prostate and Roles in Prostate Drug Disposition
J Androl, March 1, 2006; 27(2): 138 - 150.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
H. Kim, J. Lapointe, G. Kaygusuz, D. E. Ong, C. Li, M. van de Rijn, J. D. Brooks, and J. R. Pollack
The Retinoic Acid Synthesis Gene ALDH1a2 Is a Candidate Tumor Suppressor in Prostate Cancer
Cancer Res., September 15, 2005; 65(18): 8118 - 8124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. S. Palapattu, S. Sutcliffe, P. J. Bastian, E. A. Platz, A. M. De Marzo, W. B. Isaacs, and W. G. Nelson
Prostate carcinogenesis and inflammation: emerging insights
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2005; 26(7): 1170 - 1181.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol SciHome page
S. Creton, H. Zhu, and N. J. Gooderham
A Mechanistic Basis for the Role of Cycle Arrest in the Genetic Toxicology of the Dietary Carcinogen 2-Amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP)
Toxicol. Sci., April 1, 2005; 84(2): 335 - 343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
L.-C. Li, P. R. Carroll, and R. Dahiya
Epigenetic Changes in Prostate Cancer: Implication for Diagnosis and Treatment
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 19, 2005; 97(2): 103 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
W. G. Nelson
Prostate Cancer Prevention
J. Nutr., November 1, 2004; 134(11): 3211S - 3212S.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Iida, K. Itoh, Y. Kumagai, R. Oyasu, K. Hattori, K. Kawai, T. Shimazui, H. Akaza, and M. Yamamoto
Nrf2 Is Essential for the Chemopreventive Efficacy of Oltipraz against Urinary Bladder Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., September 15, 2004; 64(18): 6424 - 6431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. R. Trzeciak, S. G. Nyaga, P. Jaruga, A. Lohani, M. Dizdaroglu, and M. K. Evans
Cellular repair of oxidatively induced DNA base lesions is defective in prostate cancer cell lines, PC-3 and DU-145
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2004; 25(8): 1359 - 1370.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. A. Rybicki, D. V. Conti, A. Moreira, M. Cicek, G. Casey, and J. S. Witte
DNA Repair Gene XRCC1 and XPD Polymorphisms and Risk of Prostate Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2004; 13(1): 23 - 29.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
Inflammation, Dietary Carcinogens, Glutathione S-Transferase {pi}, and Prostatic Carcinogenesis: WILLIAM G. NELSON, ANGELO M. DE MARZO, THEODORE L. DEWEESE, AND WILLIAM B. ISAACS, The Departments of Oncology, Urology, Pathology, Pharmacology, and Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, and The Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1): 143 - 144.
[PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. Nakayama, C. J. Bennett, J. L. Hicks, J. I. Epstein, E. A. Platz, W. G. Nelson, and A. M. De Marzo
Hypermethylation of the Human Glutathione S-Transferase-{pi} Gene (GSTP1) CpG Island Is Present in a Subset of Proliferative Inflammatory Atrophy Lesions but Not in Normal or Hyperplastic Epithelium of the Prostate: A Detailed Study Using Laser-Capture Microdissection
Am. J. Pathol., September 1, 2003; 163(3): 923 - 933.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
W. G. Nelson, A. M. De Marzo, and W. B. Isaacs
Prostate Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., July 24, 2003; 349(4): 366 - 381.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. D. Brooks, M. F. Goldberg, L. A. Nelson, D. Wu, and W. G. Nelson
Identification of Potential Prostate Cancer Preventive Agents through Induction of Quinone Reductase in Vitro
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2002; 11(9): 868 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
P. L. Grover and F. L. Martin
The initiation of breast and prostate cancer
Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2002; 23(7): 1095 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
C. Jeronimo, G. Varzim, R. Henrique, J. Oliveira, M. J. Bento, C. Silva, C. Lopes, and D. Sidransky
I105V Polymorphism and Promoter Methylation of the GSTP1 Gene in Prostate Adenocarcinoma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2002; 11(5): 445 - 450.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
X. Lin, M. Tascilar, W.-H. Lee, W. J. Vles, B. H. Lee, R. Veeraswamy, K. Asgari, D. Freije, B. van Rees, W. R. Gage, et al.
GSTP1 CpG Island Hypermethylation Is Responsible for the Absence of GSTP1 Expression in Human Prostate Cancer Cells
Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2001; 159(5): 1815 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kensler, T. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, C. P.
Right arrow Articles by Kensler, T. W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online