Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Genetics and Biology of Brain Cancer
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fink, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S.
[Cancer Research 61, 256-260, January 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Immunology

Transforming Growth Factor-ß-induced Growth Inhibition in a Smad4 Mutant Colon Adenoma Cell Line1

Stephen P. Fink, Sandra E. Swinler, James D. Lutterbaugh, Joan Massagué, Sam Thiagalingam, Kenneth W. Kinzler, Bert Vogelstein, James K. V. Willson and Sanford Markowitz2

Howard Hughes Medical Institute [S. P. F., J. D. L., J. M., B. V., S. M.], Department of Medicine [S. E. S., J. K. V. W., S. M.], and Ireland Cancer Center [J. K. V. W., S. M.], Case Western Reserve University and University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio 44106; Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021 [J. M.]; Genetics Program, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 [S. T.]; and The Johns Hopkins Oncology Center, Baltimore, Maryland 21231 [S. T., K. W. K., B. V.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Transforming growth factor-ß (TGF-ß) inhibits growth and induces apoptosis of colon epithelial cells. Binding of TGF-ß to its receptor induces phosphorylation of the Smad proteins Smad2 and Smad3, which then form heteromeric complexes with Smad4, translocate to the nucleus, and activate gene transcription. Smad4 function has been considered an obligate requirement for TGF-ß signaling, and Smad4 mutations present in some cancers have been considered sufficient to inactivate TGF-ß signaling. In this work, we describe studies with a nontransformed human colon epithelial cell line that is mutant for Smad4 but remains growth-inhibited by TGF-ß. The colon cell line VACO-235 has lost one of its Smad4 alleles via a chromosome 18q deletion. The remaining allele bears two missense point mutations located in regions important for Smad4 trimer formation, which is thought necessary for Smad4 function. As expected, pSBE4-BV/Luc, a Smad4-activated transcriptional reporter, was inactive in VACO-235. Nonetheless, VACO-235 demonstrated 80% growth inhibition in response to TGF-ß, as well as retention of some TGF-ß-mediated activation of the p3TP-Lux transcriptional reporter. Transient transfection of the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant allele into a Smad4-null cell line confirmed that this allele is functionally inactive as assayed by both the pSBE4-BV and p3TP-Lux reporters. The simplest explanation of these results is that there is a non-Smad4-dependent pathway for TGF-ß-mediated signaling and growth inhibition in VACO-235 cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The TGF-ß3 superfamily of cytokines, comprising TGF-ß, activins, and bone morphogenic proteins, plays an important role in a variety of cellular responses such as differentiation, cell cycle arrest, adhesion, migration, and extracellular matrix production (1) . Signaling for TGF-ß occurs through a transmembrane heteromeric receptor complex of RI and RII serine/threonine kinases. Binding of TGF-ß to this receptor complex results in the phosphorylation of RI by RII, which activates the RI kinase domain (2, 3, 4) . RI then phosphorylates intracellular mediators called Smads (5 , 6) . In the case of TGF-ß signaling, Smad2 and/or Smad3 become phosphorylated and translocate to the nucleus with Smad4 (also called DPC4), a common Smad for the TGF-ß, activin, and bone morphogenic protein signaling pathways (7) . Once in the nucleus, this heteromeric Smad complex can bind directly or in cooperation with other transcription factors to DNA to activate the transcription of defined genes (8, 9, 10) .

For many epithelial cell types, including colon, TGF-ß inhibits growth and/or induces apoptosis (11) . In colon epithelium, disruption of the TGF-ß signaling cascade is considered an important mechanism by which tumor cells can escape growth suppression (11 , 12) . In a number of colon cancers, resistance to TGF-ß growth inhibition is associated with mutations either in RII or in the signal transducers Smad4 and Smad2. RII mutations have been found to occur in ~30% of all colon adenocarcinomas, whereas the frequencies of Smad4 and Smad2 mutations are 20% and ~7%, respectively, thus indicating a role for these genes as tumor suppressors in human colon cancers (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . The function of Smad4 as a tumor suppressor is believed to be the result of its ability to bind to specific DNA sequences (SBE) and transcriptionally activate TGF-ß responsive genes. Evidence has suggested that Smad4 plays a central role in mediating most cellular responses to TGF-ß. Experiments with a colorectal cancer cell line in which Smad4 has been deleted through homologous recombination demonstrated the loss of TGF-ß responsiveness (18) . Furthermore, studies with differing Smad4 mutants derived from a variety of cancers have demonstrated that all mutations tested disrupt the ability of Smad4 to transcriptionally activate a TGF-ß-responsive luciferase reporter (19) . Finally, experiments in which Smad4 was localized to the nucleus demonstrated growth inhibition in the Smad4-null breast cancer cell line, MDA-MB-468 (20) . However, in this study we describe a nontransformed colon cell line that retains TGF-ß-mediated growth inhibitor responses despite bearing only mutant Smad4 and despite the loss of Smad4-dependent transcriptional activity.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines.
VACO-235 was maintained on rat tail collagen-coated plates in MEM media supplemented with 2% fetal bovine serum, insulin, transferrin, selenium, L-glutamine, and hydrocortisone (MEM2+ medium), as described previously (21) . VACO-9M was maintained in MEM supplemented with 8% bovine calf serum.

Growth Studies.
VACO-235 cells were plated at 8 x 104 cells/well on fresh collagen-coated 6-well plates in MEM supplemented with hormones but without fetal bovine serum (MEM+ medium). The next day the medium was removed and fresh MEM+ medium containing 10 ng/ml EGF (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) or EGF plus 20 ng/ml TGF-ß (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was added. Cells were then counted after 5 days of growth, and cell numbers were determined by removing the cells from the plates with EDTA, treating them with Pronase (13 units/ml; Sigma) to cause disaggregation, and counting them in a hemacytometer.

Cloning Smad4.
RNA from VACO-235 was prepared by extraction with guanidine isothiocyanate (14) . RT-PCR amplification of full-length VACO-235 Smad4 was achieved using the forward primer 5'-TACGCGGATCCACCATGGACAATATGTCTATTACGAATAC-3' and the reverse primer 5'-TACCGGAATTCCGGATAAACAGGATTGTATTTTGTAGTCC-3'. The PCR conditions for amplification were 1 cycle of 95°C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 58°C for 1.5 min, and 72°C for 1.5 min; and 1 cycle of 72°C for 7 min. The full-length product was then purified on 1.0% agarose gels and digested using the enzymes BamHI and EcoRI, which are incorporated into the forward and reverse RT-PCR primers, respectively (underlined sequences). The digested full-length product was then purified from the smaller digested end fragments using a QIAquick nucleotide removal kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and subsequently cloned into pcDNA3.1 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Clones were then isolated and sequenced to ensure that no other mutations were present except for the known G->C and A->C mutations at bases 1116 and 1192, respectively. Wild-type Smad4 in pcDNA3.1 was a generous gift from Dr. S. E. Kern (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD).

Reporter Assay Studies.
Cells were seeded at 5 x 105 cells/well for VACO-235 and VACO-9M in 6-well plates 1 day before transfection. The next day the medium was changed, and the cells were then transfected with 3 µg of DNA and 9 µl of FuGENE 6 (Roche, Indianapolis, IN), following the manufacturer’s protocol. For the VACO-235 and VACO-9M studies, p3TP-Lux or pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter (1.5 µg), wild-type Smad4- or VACO-235 Smad4-pcDNA3.1 (1.5 µg), and the internal control reporter plasmid pRL-CMV (0.06 µg; Promega, Madison, WI) were cotransfected, and the cells were subsequently incubated for 48 (VACO-9M) or 72 h (VACO-235) with or without 10 ng/ml TGF-ß. After the appropriate incubation time, cells were lysed and assayed for reporter activity using a Dual-Luciferase Reporter Kit (Promega) and a MLX Microtiter Plate Luminometer (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA). The pRC-CMV-RII vector was generously provided by Dr. M. Brattain (University of Texas, San Antonio, TX).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Smad4 Mutation in VACO-235.
Previous studies karyotyping the nontransformed cell line VACO-235, which was derived from an adenomatous polyp of the colon, showed that one copy of chromosome 18 contained a deletion of q12.3-q22, which would force deletion of one copy of Smad4, located at 18q21.1 (16 , 21, 22, 23) . Because Smad4 frequently is mutated in pancreatic cancers, and is also mutated at low frequency in some colon cancers (16 , 23) , we proceeded to analyze the remaining Smad4 copy in VACO-235 for possible inactivating mutations. Sequencing demonstrated that VACO-235 expresses a single Smad4 transcript that contains two missense point mutations, one at codon 330 [GAA to CAA (Glu to Gln)], the second at codon 355 [GAC to GCC (Asp to Ala; data not shown)]. Both mutations occur at amino acids that are highly conserved throughout the Smad family of proteins. A comparison of these mutations with the crystal structure of the 234 amino acids at the COOH terminus of Smad4 (residues 319–552) obtained by Shi et al. (24) indicate that the Asp355Ala mutation occurs in what is called the "loop/helix" region of Smad4. The loop/helix region of Smad4 is believed to be important in trimer formation and, therefore, for the function of the Smad4 protein. Mutations in this region have been shown to disrupt Smad4 trimer formation and to abolish Smad4-dependent transcriptional activation (19 , 24) . Furthermore, mutations that are localized in this loop-helix region have been found in Smad4 in ovarian and colon cancers, in Smad2 in colon cancer (16 , 17 , 25) , and in three colon cancer cell lines from our laboratory.4 The VACO-235 Asp355Ala Smad4 mutation induces a charge loss in this critical domain that is predicted to both disrupt trimer formation and abolish Smad4 transcriptional activity. Comparison with the crystal structure similarly shows that the VACO-235 Smad4 Glu330Gln mutation is located in the edge of a ß-sandwich structural motif and results in a charge shift that abolishes a hydrogen bond to Asn369 and thus should destabilize the rigid structure of the loop/helix region surrounding Asn369 (24) .

Growth Suppression of VACO-235 by TGF-ß.
Because the Glu330Gln and Asp355Ala mutations appear to be in regions important for Smad4 structure and function, we presumed that one or both of the mutations would disrupt the function of Smad4 in VACO-235. If so, it would be expected that VACO-235 would be resistant to growth inhibition by TGF-ß. However, previous studies by our group had demonstrated that the growth of VACO-235 is, in fact, strongly inhibited by TGF-ß (22) . Accordingly, we reprised studies of TGF-ß growth inhibition of VACO-235 using the same culture of cells in which we had demonstrated Smad4 mutations. These cells again showed that VACO-235 growth is inhibited 76% by 20 ng/ml TGF-ß (Fig. 1)Citation , even in the presence of 10 ng/ml EGF, a growth stimulator (22) .



View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Growth Inhibition of VACO-235 by TGF-ß. VACO-235 cells were seeded at 8 x 104 cells/well in serum-free growth medium containing EGF. The next day, TGF-ß was added. After 6 days of growth in TGF-ß, cells were counted and percentage of cell growth was determined as (final cell number - 8 x 104)/8 x 104. Bars, SD.

 
Loss of SBE4-mediated Transcriptional Responses in VACO-235.
To confirm that the VACO-235 Smad4 mutation indeed inactivated Smad4 function, we tested the ability of TGF-ß to activate the pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter, which contains four repeats of an eight-base palindromic SBE, driving a luciferase reporter (26) . As shown in Fig. 2ACitation , in VACO-235, TGF-ß was unable to activate transcription from the pSBE4-BV/Luc Smad4 reporter. To demonstrate that mutational inactivation of the VACO-235 Smad4 accounted for the loss of pSBE4-BV/Luc transcriptional responses, we cotransfected pSBE4-BV/Luc together with an expression vector expressing either wild-type Smad4 or the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant into VACO-235. Cotransfection of the pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter with wild-type Smad4 led to a 35-fold induction of pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter activity in TGF-ß-treated versus untreated cells (Fig. 2A)Citation . A similar 35-fold induction of pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter activity was noted for TGF-ß-treated cells transfected with a wild-type Smad4 compared with cells transfected with an empty vector control (Fig. 2A)Citation . In contrast, cells transfected with the expression vector encoding the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant showed no TGF-ß-mediated induction of pSBE4/BV-Luc activity. Thus, wild-type Smad4 restored pSBE4-BV-Luc transcriptional responses to VACO-235; whereas even overexpression of the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant did not. This suggests that the VACO-235 Smad4 mutation indeed accounts for the loss of pSBE4-BV/Luc transcriptional activity and that the VACO-235 Smad4 does not contain even an attenuated transcriptional activation function.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. TGF-ß-mediated transcriptional responses in VACO-235. A, loss of pSBE4-BV/Luc reporter responses in VACO-235. Shown is fold induction of pSBE4-BV/Luc luciferase activity in VACO-235 transfected with pcDNA3.1 (empty vector), pcDNA3.1 containing the cDNA for wild-type Smad4 (WT-Smad4), or the cDNA for VACO-235 mutant Smad4 (VACO-235 Smad4). Transfections were performed with ({blacksquare}) or without ({square}) treatment with 10 ng/ml TGF-ß for 72 h. Transfections were normalized relative to the activity of a cotransfected pRL-CMV vector. B, diminished p3TP-Lux reporter responses in VACO-235. Transfection conditions were the same as for A except that the reporter plasmid, p3TP-Lux, was used to assay for TGF-ß transcriptional activity. Bars, SD.

 
Retention of Partial 3TP-Lux Transcriptional Responses in VACO-235.
Because VACO-235 demonstrated TGF-ß-mediated growth inhibition despite the loss of Smad4 activity, we assayed VACO-235 cells for retention of other TGF-ß-mediated transcriptional responses using the luciferase reporter construct p3TP-Lux. p3TP-Lux contains TGF-ß response elements from the TGF-ß-regulated PAI-1 promoter plus three 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate response elements (3) and has been used extensively in the study of TGF-ß responsiveness in a variety of cell lines (3 , 12 , 27, 28, 29) . As shown in Fig. 2BCitation , VACO-235 demonstrated a 3-fold induction of p3TP-Lux activity when treated with 10 ng/ml TGF-ß. When cotransfected into VACO-235 cells together with a wild-type Smad4 expression vector, p3TP-Lux showed a larger, 7-fold induction in response to TGF-ß. In contrast, cotransfection of p3TP-Lux together with the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant did not increase the responsiveness of p3TP-Lux to TGF-ß compared with cells transfected with an empty expression vector (Fig. 2B)Citation . Thus VACO-235 appears to retain the ability to partially activate p3TP-Lux transcription in response to TGF-ß. This activity can be augmented by reexpression of wild-type Smad4, but it does not appear to be the result of residual activity of the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant.

VACO-235 Smad4 Does Not Activate p3TP-Lux or pSBE4-BV/Luc Reporters in a Smad4-null Line.
To further confirm the absence of transcriptional activity in the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant, this allele was transiently expressed in a Smad4-null cell line, VACO-9M, together with the TGF-ß-regulated reporter constructs, p3TP-Lux and pSBE4-BV/Luc. VACO-9M does not express Smad4 mRNA, as determined by both RT-PCR and Northern blot.4 As shown in Fig. 3Citation , treatment with 10 ng/ml TGF-ß did not significantly induce luciferase activity in VACO-9M transfected with either the p3TP-Lux or pSBE4-BV/luc reporters that were accompanied by control empty expression vectors. Transfection of wild-type Smad4 into TGF-ß-treated VACO-9M cells increased the activity of p3TP-Lux 4-fold and the activity of pSBE4-BV/Luc 8.5-fold, compared with transfection with the empty vector control (Fig. 3)Citation . In contrast, transfection of the VACO-235 Smad4 into VACO-9M gave results essentially identical to transfection of an empty vector control (Fig. 3)Citation . Thus, the VACO-235 Smad4 mutant allele was functionally inactive when tested for the ability to induce TGF-ß-dependent transcription of the pSBE4/BV-Luc or the p3TP-Lux reporter.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. VACO-235 Smad4 cannot activate the p3TP-Lux or pSBE4-BV/Luc reporters in the Smad4-null line, VACO-9M. A, fold induction of p3TP-Lux luciferase activity in VACO-9M transfected with pcDNA3.1 (empty vector), pcDNA3.1 containing the cDNA for wild-type Smad4 (WT-Smad4), or the cDNA for VACO-235 mutant Smad4 (VACO-235 Smad4). Transfections were performed with ({blacksquare}) and without ({square}) treatment with 10 ng/ml TGF-ß for 48 h. Transfections were normalized relative to the activity of a cotransfected pRL-CMV vector. B, transfection conditions the same as for A except the reporter plasmid, pSBE4-BV/Luc, was used to assay for TGF-ß transcriptional activity. Bars, SD.

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Our findings demonstrate the preservation of significant TGF-ß-mediated growth-inhibitory responses in human colon epithelial cells that bear a mutant Smad4 allele. Additionally, these cells retain at least partial TGF-ß-stimulated transcriptional responses as determined by the TGF-ß-mediated increase in p3TP-Lux activity. To the extent that we can assay, the TGF-ß-induced VACO-235 transcriptional responses appear unlikely to be mediated by residual activity of the mutant VACO-235 Smad4 allele because introduction of this allele into a Smad4-null cell line does not confer TGF-ß-mediated induction of either the p3TP-Lux or the pSBE4/BV-Luc reporter. These experiments thus suggest that a non-Smad4-dependent pathway can transduce TGF-ß-mediated growth-inhibitory responses and at least some TGF-ß-mediated transcriptional responses. Such an interpretation is consistent with a previous observation from our laboratory of a colon cancer in which Smad4 and RII had both been targeted for mutational inactivation (12) .

Phosphorylation of Smad proteins by TGF-ß receptors has been directly demonstrated to induce nuclear migration of activated Smad complexes and activation of a number of TGF-ß-regulated gene promoters, including PAI-1 (30, 31, 32) and Mix.2 (33 , 34) , to which activated Smad complexes bind directly. Our findings of TGF-ß-induced responses in Smad4-mutant VACO-235 cells are, however, consistent with observations that the growth of Smad4-null MEF cells remains 50% inhibited by TGF-ß and that these cells can also transcriptionally induce fibronectin and PAI-1 (28) . The investigators in this study speculated that their findings could in part reflect differences between fibroblasts and epithelial cells or between murine and human cells. We found that the growth of Smad4-mutant human colon epithelial cells is in fact even more profoundly inhibited by TGF-ß (76%) than are Smad4-null MEF cells. The Smad4-mutant human colon epithelial cells also differ from the Smad4-null murine fibroblasts in maintaining TGF-ß-mediated induction of the p3TP-Lux reporter. Our findings are also consistent with observations of a Smad4-null pancreatic cancer cell line that retains partial sensitivity to growth inhibition by TGF-ß (35) . Thus, studies in multiple different systems now support a model in which growth-inhibitory responses to TGF-ß appear to be transduced at least in part by a Smad4-independent pathway.

A number of alternative signaling pathways have been suggested to potentially participate in TGF-ß-induced responses. TGF-ß activation of Ras activity has been suggested to participate in TGF-ß signaling (36) and in TGF-ß-mediated growth inhibition (35) . Ras mutations have also been suggested to participate in induction of resistance to TGF-ß growth inhibition (27) . However, VACO-235 cells bear a K-ras codon 12 mutation (22) , suggesting that TGF-ß-induced growth inhibition in these cells is mediated by a Ras-independent mechanism. TGF-ß-mediated activation of SAPK/JNK signaling has been demonstrated to have a Smad4-independent component (37) and to participate in the TGF-ß induction of fibronectin (38) , but thus far this pathway has not been successfully demonstrated to mediate TGF-ß-induced growth inhibition (37 , 38) . Moreover, the potential for other Smads to act independently of or in place of Smad4 is raised by findings that Smad3 can to bind to other signaling molecules, such as the vitamin D receptor (39) , and by the identification of the Smad4-related Smad4ß gene in Xenopus (40, 41, 42) , which could potentially have an as yet unidentified human orthologue.

In overview, analogous to growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases that activate multiple signaling pathways, we suggest a model in which TGF-ß signaling also potentially engages multiple pathways that act to mutually reinforce a common response. An alternative interpretation of our findings would be that the Smad4 missense mutation present in VACO-235 is an unusual hypomorphic allele, which although apparently inactive in transcriptional assays, can nonetheless mediate a TGF-ß growth-inhibitory response. Although the observations above disfavor this interpretation, we cannot completely exclude it. However, if correct, this interpretation would suggest that the growth-inhibitory activity of Smad4 is distinguishable from its ability to activate the consensus SBE4, and hence proceeds via an alternative mechanism. In either interpretation, the VACO-235 cell model described here should be of clear utility in elucidating key elements of the TGF-ß signaling pathway that specifically participate in the TGF-ß growth-inhibitory response.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Ronda Brady for expert technical assistance.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Public Health Service Grants RO1 CA67409, RO1 CA72160, and P30 CA43703. S. M. is an associate investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. J. M. and B. V. are investigators of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at UCRC #2, Room 200, Ireland Cancer Center, 11001 Cedar Road, Cleveland, OH 44106. Back

3 The abbreviations used are: TGF-ß, transforming growth factor-ß; RI and RII, TGF-ß receptors type I and type II; SBE, Smad binding element; EGF, epidermal growth factor; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; PAI-1, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1. Back

4 S. P. Fink, unpublished data. Back

Received 9/ 1/00. Accepted 11/ 1/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Massagué J. TGFß signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67: 753-791, 1998.[Medline]
  2. Wrana J. L., Attisano L., Wieser R., Ventura F., Massagué J. Mechanism of activation of the TGF-ß receptor. Nature (Lond.), 370: 341-347, 1994.[Medline]
  3. Wrana J. L., Attisano L., Cárcamo J., Zentella A., Doody J., Laiho M., Wang X-F., Massagué J. TGFß signals through a heteromeric protein kinase receptor complex. Cell, 71: 1003-1014, 1992.[Medline]
  4. Franzen P., ten Dijke P., Ichijo H., Yamashita H., Schulz P., Heldin C., Miyazono K. Cloning of a TGF-ß type I receptor that forms a heteromeric complex with the TGF-ß type II receptor. Cell, 75: 681-692, 1993.[Medline]
  5. Souchelnytshyi S., Tamaki K., Engstrom U., Wernstedt C., ten Dijke P., Heldin C-H. Phosphorylation of Ser465 and Ser467 in the C terminus of Smad2 mediates interaction with Smad4 and is required for transforming growth factor-ß signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 28107-28115, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Abdollah S., Macias-Silva M., Tsukazaki T., Hayashi H., Attisano L., Wrana J. L. TßRI phosphorylation of Smad2 on Ser465 and Ser467 is required for Smad2-Smad4 complex formation and signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 27678-27685, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Attisano L., Wrana J. Mads, and Smads in TGFß signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10: 188-194, 1998.[Medline]
  8. Massagué J., Wotton D. Transcriptional control by the TGF-ß/Smad signaling system. EMBO J., 19: 1745-1754, 2000.[Medline]
  9. Kretzschmar M., Massagué J. SMADs: mediators and regulators of TGF-ß signaling. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 8: 103-111, 1998.[Medline]
  10. Heldin C-J., Miyazono K., ten Dijke P. TGF-ß signalling from cell membrane to nucleus through SMAD proteins. Nature (Lond.), 390: 465-471, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Markowitz S. D., Roberts A. B. Tumor suppressor activity of the TGF-ß pathway in human cancers. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev., 7: 93-102, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Grady W. M., Myeroff L. L., Swinler S. E., Rajput A., Thiagalingam S., Lutterbaugh J. D., Neumann A., Brattain M. G., Chang J., Kim S-J., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., Willson J. K. V., Markowitz S. Mutational inactivation of transforming growth factor ß receptor type II in microsatellite stable colon cancers. Cancer Res., 59: 320-324, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Riggins G., Thiagalingam S., Weinstein R. E. C., Kern S. E., Hamilton S., Willson J. K. V., Markowitz S., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Mad-related genes in the human. Nat. Genet., 13: 347-349, 1996.[Medline]
  14. Markowitz S., Wang J., Myeroff L., Parsons R., Sun L., Lutterbaugh J., Fan R. S., Zborowska E., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., Brattain M., Willson J. K. V. Inactivation of the type II TGF-ß receptor in colon cancer cells with microsatellite instability. Science (Washington DC), 268: 1336-1338, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Parsons R., Myeroff L., Liu B., Willson J. K. V., Markowitz S., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Microsatellite instability and mutations of the transforming growth factor ß type II receptor gene in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res., 55: 5548-5550, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Thiagalingam S., Lengauer C., Leach F. S., Schutte M., Hahn S. A., Overhauser L., Willson J. K. V., Markowitz S., Hamilton S. R., Kern S. E., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Evaluation of candidate tumour suppressor genes on chromosome 18 in colorectal cancers. Nat. Genet., 13: 343-346, 1996.[Medline]
  17. Eppert K., Scherer S. W., Ozcelik H., Pirone R., Hoodless P., Kim H., Tsui L-C., Bapat B., Gallinger S., Andrulis I. L., Thomsen G. H., Wrana J. L., Attisano L. MADR2 maps to 18q21 and encodes a TGFß-regulated MAD-related protein that is functionally mutated in colorectal carcinoma. Cell, 86: 543-552, 1996.[Medline]
  18. Zhou S., Buckhaults P., Zawel L., Bunz F., Riggins G., Dai J. L., Kern S. E., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Targeted deletion of Smad4 shows it is required for transforming growth factor ß and activin signaling in colorectal cancer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 2412-2416, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Dai J. L., Turnacioglu K. K., Schutte M., Sgar A. Y., Kern S. E. Dpc4 transcriptional activation and dysfunction in cancer cells. Cancer Res., 58: 4592-4597, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Dai J. L., Bansal R. K., Kern S. E. G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induction by nuclear Smad4/Dpc4: phenotypes reversed by a tumorigenic mutation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96: 1427-1432, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Willson J. K. V., Bittner G. N., Oberley T. D., Meisner L. F., Weese J. L. Cell culture of human colon adenomas and carcinomas. Cancer Res., 47: 2704-2713, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Markowitz S. D., Myeroff L., Cooper M. J., Traicoff J., Kochera M., Lutterbaugh J., Swiriduk M., Willson J. K. V. A benign cultured colon adenoma bears three genetically altered colon cancer oncogenes, but progresses to tumorigenicity and transforming growth factor-ß independence without inactivating the p53 tumor suppressor gene. J. Clin. Investig., 93: 1005-1013, 1994.
  23. Hahn S. A., Schutte M., Hoque A. T. M. S., Moskaluk C. A., da Costa L. T., Rozenblum E., Weinstein C. L., Fischer A., Yeo C. J., Hruban R. H., Kern S. E. DPC4, a candidate tumor suppressor gene at human chromosome 18q21. 1. Science (Washington DC), 271: 350-353, 1996.[Abstract]
  24. Shi Y., Hata A., Lo R. S., Massagué J., Pavletich N. P. A structural basis for mutational inactivation of the tumour suppressor Smad4. Nature (Lond.), 388: 87-93, 1997.[Medline]
  25. Schutte M., Hruban R. H., Hedrick L., Cho K. R., Nadasdy G. M., Weinstein C. L., Bova G. S., Isaacs W. B., Cairns P., Nawroz H., Sidranshy D., Casero R. A., Jr., Meltzer P. S., Hahn S. A., Kern S. E. DPC4 gene in various tumor types. Cancer Res., 56: 2527-2530, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Zawel L., Dai J. L., Buckhaults P., Zhou S., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B., Kern S. E. Human Smad3 and Smad4 are sequence-specific transcription activators. Mol. Cell, 1: 611-617, 1998.[Medline]
  27. Calonge M. J., Massagué J. Smad4/DPC4 silencing and hyperactive Ras jointly disrupt transforming growth factor-ß antiproliferative responses in colon cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 33637-33643, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Sirard C., Kim S., Mirtsos C., Tadich P., Hoodless P. A., Itie A., Maxson R., Wrana J. L., Mak T. W. Targeted disruption in murine cells reveals variable requirement for Smad4 in transforming growth factor ß-related signaling. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 2063-2070, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Yingling J. M., Datto M. B., Wong C., Frederick J. P., Liberati N. T., Wang X-F. Tumor suppressor Smad4 is a transforming growth factor ß-inducible DNA binding protein. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 7019-7028, 1997.[Abstract]
  30. Dennler S., Itoh S., Vivien D., ten Dijke P., Huet S., Gauthier J. M. Direct binding of Smad3 and Smad4 to critical TGF-ß-inducible elements in the promoter of human plasminogen activator inhibitor-type 1 gene. EMBO J., 17: 3091-3100, 1998.[Medline]
  31. Hua X., Liu X., Ansari D. O., Lodish H. F. Synergistic cooperation of TFE3 and Smad proteins in TGF-ß-induced transcription of the plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 gene. Genes Dev., 12: 3084-3095, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Liu X., Sun Y., Constantinescu S. N., Karam E., Weinberg R. A., Lodish H. F. Transforming growth factor ß-induced phosphorylation of Smad3 is required for growth inhibition and transcriptional induction in epithelial cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 10669-10674, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Chen X., Rubock M. J., Whitman M. A transcription partner for MAD proteins in TGF-ß signaling. Nature (Lond.), 383: 691-696, 1996.[Medline]
  34. Chen X., Weisberg E., Fridmacher F., Watanabe M., Naco G., Whitman M. Smad4 and FAST-1 in the assembly of activin-responsive factor. Nature (Lond.), 389: 85-89, 1997.[Medline]
  35. Dai J. L., Schutte M., Bansal R. K., Wilentz R. E., Sugar A. Y., Kern S. E. Transforming growth factor-ßresponsiveness in DPC4/SMAD4-null cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog., 26: 37-43, 1999.[Medline]
  36. Mulder K. M., Morris S. L. Activation of P21Ras by transforming growth factor-ß in epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem., 267: 5029-5031, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Engel M. E., McDonnell M. A., Law B. K., Moses H. L. Interdependent SMAD and JNK signaling in transforming growth factor-ß-mediated transcription. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 37413-37420, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Hocevar B. A., Brown T. L., Howe P. H. TGF-ß induces fibronectin synthesis through a c-Jun N-terminal kinase-dependent, Smad4-independent pathway. EMBO J., 18: 1345-1356, 1999.[Medline]
  39. Yanagisawa J., Yanagi Y., Masuhiro Y., Suzawa M., Watanabe M., Kashiwagi K., Toriyabe T., Kawabata M., Miyazono K., Kato S. Convergence of transforming growth factor-ß and vitamin D signaling pathways on SMAD transcriptional coactivators. Science (Washington DC), 283: 1317-1321, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. LeSueur J. A., Graff J. M. Spemann organizer activity of Smad10. Development, 126: 137-146, 1999.[Abstract]
  41. Howell M., Itoh F., Pierreux C. E., Valgeirsdottir S., Itoh S., ten Dijke P., Hill C. S. Xenopus Smad4ß is the co-Smad component of developmentally regulated transcription factor complexes responsible for induction of early mesodermal genes. Dev. Biol., 214: 354-369, 1999.[Medline]
  42. Masuyama N., Hanafusa H., Kusakabe M., Shibuya H., Nishida E. Identification of two Smad4 proteins in Xenopus. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 12163-12170, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
S. I. Berndt, W.-Y. Huang, N. Chatterjee, M. Yeager, R. Welch, S. J. Chanock, J. L. Weissfeld, R. E. Schoen, and R. B. Hayes
Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFB1) gene polymorphisms and risk of advanced colorectal adenoma
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2007; 28(9): 1965 - 1970.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. K. Halder, G. Anumanthan, R. Maddula, J. Mann, A. Chytil, A. L. Gonzalez, M. K. Washington, H. L. Moses, R. D. Beauchamp, and P. K. Datta
Oncogenic Function of a Novel WD-Domain Protein, STRAP, in Human Carcinogenesis.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6156 - 6166.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
L. Levy and C. S. Hill
Smad4 Dependency Defines Two Classes of Transforming Growth Factor {beta} (TGF-{beta}) Target Genes and Distinguishes TGF-{beta}-Induced Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition from Its Antiproliferative and Migratory Responses
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2005; 25(18): 8108 - 8125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
J. Rodriguez-Vita, E. Sanchez-Lopez, V. Esteban, M. Ruperez, J. Egido, and M. Ruiz-Ortega
Angiotensin II Activates the Smad Pathway in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells by a Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-Independent Mechanism
Circulation, May 17, 2005; 111(19): 2509 - 2517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
W. M. Grady
Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}, Smads, and Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2005; 11(9): 3151 - 3154.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
R. L. Elliott and G. C. Blobe
Role of Transforming Growth Factor Beta in Human Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 20, 2005; 23(9): 2078 - 2093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. Panopoulou, C. Murphy, H. Rasmussen, E. Bagli, E. K. Rofstad, and T. Fotsis
Activin A Suppresses Neuroblastoma Xenograft Tumor Growth via Antimitotic and Antiangiogenic Mechanisms
Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 65(5): 1877 - 1886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
P. Rouet-Benzineb, C. Rouyer-Fessard, A. Jarry, V. Avondo, C. Pouzet, M. Yanagisawa, C. Laboisse, M. Laburthe, and T. Voisin
Orexins Acting at Native OX1 Receptor in Colon Cancer and Neuroblastoma Cells or at Recombinant OX1 Receptor Suppress Cell Growth by Inducing Apoptosis
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 2004; 279(44): 45875 - 45886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
T. T. Maliekal, R. J. Anto, and D. Karunagaran
Differential Activation of Smads in HeLa and SiHa Cells That Differ in Their Response to Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}
J. Biol. Chem., August 27, 2004; 279(35): 36287 - 36292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
C. A. Iacobuzio-Donahue, J. Song, G. Parmiagiani, C. J. Yeo, R. H. Hruban, and S. E. Kern
Missense Mutations of MADH4: Characterization of the Mutational Hot Spot and Functional Consequences in Human Tumors
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 10(5): 1597 - 1604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. S. HUANG, T.-Y. LING, W.-F. TSENG, Y.-H. HUANG, F.-M. TANG, S. M. LEAL, and J. S. HUANG
Cellular growth inhibition by IGFBP-3 and TGF-{beta}1 requires LRP-1
FASEB J, November 1, 2003; 17(14): 2068 - 2081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
E. B. Brunschwig, K. Wilson, D. Mack, D. Dawson, E. Lawrence, J. K.V. Willson, S. Lu, A. Nosrati, R. M. Rerko, S. Swinler, et al.
PMEPA1, a Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}-induced Marker of Terminal Colonocyte Differentiation Whose Expression Is Maintained in Primary and Metastatic Colon Cancer
Cancer Res., April 1, 2003; 63(7): 1568 - 1575.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S.-M. Kakonen, K. S. Selander, J. M. Chirgwin, J. J. Yin, S. Burns, W. A. Rankin, B. G. Grubbs, M. Dallas, Y. Cui, and T. A. Guise
Transforming Growth Factor-beta Stimulates Parathyroid Hormone-related Protein and Osteolytic Metastases via Smad and Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase Signaling Pathways
J. Biol. Chem., June 28, 2002; 277(27): 24571 - 24578.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. C. Blobe, X. Liu, S. J. Fang, T. How, and H. F. Lodish
A Novel Mechanism for Regulating Transforming Growth Factor beta (TGF-beta ) Signaling. FUNCTIONAL MODULATION OF TYPE III TGF-beta RECEPTOR EXPRESSION THROUGH INTERACTION WITH THE PDZ DOMAIN PROTEIN, GIPC
J. Biol. Chem., October 19, 2001; 276(43): 39608 - 39617.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. C. Blobe, W. P. Schiemann, M.-C. Pepin, M. Beauchemin, A. Moustakas, H. F. Lodish, and M. D. O'Connor-McCourt
Functional Roles for the Cytoplasmic Domain of the Type III Transforming Growth Factor beta Receptor in Regulating Transforming Growth Factor beta Signaling
J. Biol. Chem., June 29, 2001; 276(27): 24627 - 24637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fink, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fink, S. P.
Right arrow Articles by Markowitz, S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online