| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Tumor Biology |
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 90109-1024
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adult mice exposed to whole body ionizing radiation show rapid (24 h) p53 accumulation and apoptosis in splenic and thymic lymphocytes, in intestinal crypt cells, in hair follicles, and ependyma (9, 10, 11, 12) . p53 accumulation, but no associated apoptosis, is observed in subpopulations of cells in the lung, salivary gland, choroid plexus, adrenal gland, kidney, epidermis, and myocardium. Little or no p53 protein is detected in liver, skeletal muscle, and brain. The increased apoptosis in lymphocytes and intestinal crypt cells in response to DNA damage is not seen in p53-deficient mice (9, 10, 11 , 13) . These studies contributed to the idea that DNA damage-induced apoptosis is mediated by p53 and that this property of p53 is central to its role as a tumor suppressor. However, it is also evident that most cells in the mouse accumulate little or no p53 and, further, that not all cells that accumulate p53 undergo apoptosis. The role of p53 as a tumor suppressor in these tissues is less obvious.
Tumor suppression by p53 is also tissue-type-dependent. For example, in mice, p53 has a prominent tumor-suppressing role during lymphomagenesis, sarcomagenesis, and skin carcinogenesis, but has shown little influence during liver or lung tumorigenesis (14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19) . At present, the biological basis for this tissue specificity is not known but it may be related to differences in the activity of the p53 pathway.
Tumor cells have a number of genetic and phenotypic alterations, such as activated or overexpressed oncogenes, abnormal proliferation, hypoxic growth conditions, and altered responses to growth factors, that may alter the activity of the p53 pathway relative to normal progenitor cells (3 , 20) . Also, p53 mutations are frequently observed at the later stages of tumor progression and, therefore, selective pressure in favor of cells with p53 mutations would be expected to occur within developing tumors rather than in normal tissue. Therefore, we examined one pathway involving p53, accumulation of p53, and apoptosis in response to DNA damage in developing autochthonous tumors.
Another line of investigation has shown that p53 is required for apoptosis and enhances tumor regression in transformed cells in response to radiation and chemotherapeutic agents (6 , 21) . From this and related studies a widely held view has emerged that cells in human tumors with wild-type p53, treated with anticancer agents, die by apoptosis leading to tumor regression (22 , 23) . Conversely, tumors that have lost the apoptotic response, for example because of p53 mutation, will be resistant to therapy. However, this assumption has been difficult to test in the clinic, and the role of p53 or apoptosis in the response of human tumors to therapy, especially those of nonhematological origin, is at present, not clear (24 , 25) .
In light of these issues, we examined p53 induction and apoptosis in response to commonly used genotoxic anticancer agents in six different murine tumor types. With the exception of lymphoid tumors, these were solid tumors of epithelial origin, typical of human malignancies. Importantly, these tumors were not manipulated as cell lines or with exogenous DNA but originated and clonally evolved in situ, and contained "physiological" levels of activated oncogenes. This provides a realistic model for examining the short-term response of autochthonous tumors to therapeutic intervention.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
radiation (1 Gy,
137Cs). Spontaneous lymphomas from C3H/HeJ
p53 -/- mice (26)
were also used. Squamous
cell papillomas were induced in CC3 F1 and
129/SvJ x NIH/Ola F1 mice using a
standard two-stage protocol with DMBA and TPA as
described (16)
. Liver tumors were induced in CC3
F1 mice with a single injection of
N,N-diethylnitrosamine (0.2 µmol/g body weight, i.p.) at
12 days of age. Lung tumors were induced in NIH/Ola mice with a single
injection of urethane (1.0 mg/g body weight, i.p.) given to 12-day-old
mice. Mammary tumors were induced by six consecutive treatments of
NIH/129 mice with DMBA (1 mg/week, by gavage). Intestinal
adenomas arose spontaneously in C57BL/6J min/+
mice, which are predisposed to this tumor type because of a mutation in
the Apc gene (27)
.
Mice that developed lymphomas, intestinal adenomas, mammary tumors, or
papillomas were treated when they showed signs of tumor burden, between
1240 weeks of age. Mice that developed lung or liver tumors were used
between 3050 weeks of age, based on historical data on the rate of
tumor appearance at these sites. Two to 48 h prior to sacrifice,
tumor-bearing mice were treated with one of the following: whole body
radiation (4 or 8 Gy, using a 137Cs source at
a dose rate of 0.7 Gy/min), etoposide (40 mg/kg, i.p.; Sigma Chemical
Co.), doxorubicin (10 mg/kg, i.p.; Sigma Chemical Co.), cisplatin (20
mg/kg; "Platinol AQ"; Bristol Laboratories), or DMSO vehicle
control. The dosages used were similar to or higher than those shown to
be effective in inducing apoptosis or tumor regression using
xenografted cell lines in nude mice (6
, 28, 29, 30)
. All of
the agents are known to induce DNA damage, p53 accumulation, and
apoptosis and are widely used in cancer therapy (31, 32, 33)
.
At 248 h after treatment, tumor tissue was dissected free and fixed in 10% formalin for 46 h, transferred to 70% methanol, and then processed for paraffin embedding and sectioning. Serial sections were cut from each sample. One section was stained with H&E for histopathological analysis and enumeration of apoptotic cells. Serial sections were stained with p53 antibody (CM5; Santa Cruz) and counter-stained with methyl green as described previously (34) . TUNEL3 was performed on serial sections as previously described (34) . There was a close correlation between the apoptotic index as determined by TUNEL and by morphological criteria in H&E-stained sections. The latter method is the most direct and was used for quantification. The percentage of cells positive for p53 nuclear staining and apoptotic index was determined by examining five 400x microscopic fields per tumor. The apoptotic index was expressed as the number of apoptotic cells per 400x field. All of the samples were examined without knowledge of tumor genotype or treatment. We confirmed the efficacy of agents administered to the tumor-bearing mice by examining intestinal crypt cells for p53 accumulation and apoptosis.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
irradiation
(9
, 10)
. Large-scale apoptosis was also seen in
autochthonous T-lymphoma cells from irradiated scid/scid
mice but not scid/scid p53-/- mice, which indicated that
p53 mediated this response (35)
. However,
scid/scid mice are radiosensitive, and this could influence
the apoptotic response; therefore, here we examined 12 lymphomas from
12 mice that did not have the scid mutation. p53 was
undetectable by immunohistochemistry in lymphoma cells from untreated
mice. Nuclear p53 accumulation and apoptosis of the lymphoma cells in
thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes was greatly increased at 4 h after
4 Gy (Fig. 1
|
|
In a study of similar design, radiation-induced apoptosis was not seen in intestinal adenomas from Min/+ p53-/- mice, which indicated it was p53 dependent (36) . In normal murine intestine, the activation of the DNA damage-p53 accumulation-apoptosis pathway is restricted to cells near the bottom of the crypt, which is where the stem and proliferating cells are located (11 , 13) . Thus, intestinal adenoma cells have a p53 response similar to these cells, but unlike differentiating cells in the upper crypt or villus in which p53 and apoptosis are not induced. This indicates that the adenomas originate from cells near the bottom of the crypt and retain the p53 response pathway. Alternatively, if the adenomas originate from cells from the upper region of the crypt or villus, then during their neoplastic evolution they must have acquired the ability to induce p53 and undergo apoptosis.
Mammary Tumors.
Mammary carcinomas were induced in mice by treatment with DMBA. In all
three tumors examined from untreated mice, p53 staining was
undetectable in tumor cells, and apoptotic index was very low
(Fig. 1
, panel 3, and Fig. 2
, panel 3). In all
four tumors examined from irradiated mice, p53 was induced in the tumor
cells and apoptotic index was significantly increased (Fig. 1
,
panel 3, and Fig. 2
, panel 3). Thus, exposure of
tumor bearing mice to DNA-damaging agents induces p53 and apoptosis in
epithelial tumors of the small intestine and breast.
Squamous Cell Papillomas.
In 31 of 31 untreated papillomas, p53 protein was constitutively
expressed and highly localized to the keratinocytes in the basal layer
of the tumor (Fig. 1
, panel 4). p53 expression
decreased in the suprabasal and terminally differentiating cells of the
tumor and was not observed in stromal cells. This highly localized
region of p53 expression spatially coincided with Ki67 positive cells,
which were also confined to the basal proliferating tumor cells (data
not shown). Despite these high levels of p53, apoptotic cells were very
infrequently observed (Fig. 1
, panel 4, and Fig. 2
, panel 4). At 4 (n = 8), 24 (n = 6), or 48 (n = 4) h after 4 Gy radiation of papilloma-bearing mice, the
intensity of p53 staining and the percentage of positive cells
increased in the same highly restricted cell layer but was again absent
from suprabasal cells (Fig. 1
, panel 4). This
pattern was also observed in papillomas from etoposide- and
doxorubicin-treated mice. Altogether, 38 treated papillomas were
examined. In contrast to tumors described above, the apoptotic index
was not increased in papillomas from radiation-, etoposide-, or
doxorubicin-treated mice, even as late as 48 h posttreatment (Fig. 1
, panel 4, and Fig. 2
, panel
4). This lack of apoptosis was also seen in all six
papillomas from radiation- or etoposide-treated scid/scid
mice, despite the fact that these mice are radiosensitive. Thus
papilloma cells are notably resistant to DNA damage induced apoptosis.
The highly localized expression pattern of p53 in papillomas also
indicates that even within a given tumor type, p53 expression is highly
regulated.
Lung and Liver Adenomas.
Previous results showed that p53 protein is not, or is barely,
detectable by immunostaining in lung or liver after whole body
irradiation (12)
. Because parenchymal cells of these
organs are mostly quiescent, tumors were induced to determine whether
increased proliferation or activated oncogenes associated with tumor
growth might de-repress the p53 pathway. p53 protein was undetectable
in all of the liver adenomas and adenocarcinomas from untreated mice.
Twenty-eight mice bearing multiple liver tumors were treated, and p53
induction and apoptosis measured. Five to 20 tumors were examined for
each treatment regimen and time point. At 4, 24, or 48 h after 4
or 8 Gy radiation, etoposide, or cisplatin treatment, p53 protein
remained undetectable in cells of microscopic or macroscopic
hepatocellular adenomas at all of the time points and doses (Fig. 1
,
panel 5A, and Fig. 2
, panel
5A). One exception was in liver adenomas from
scid/scid mice examined 48 h after etoposide treatment,
where faint and very occasional p53-staining nuclei were observed (data
not shown). Apoptotic cells were only very rarely observed (<0.5%) in
all of the treated tumors examined, even as late as 48 h
posttreatment after 8 Gy radiation (Fig. 1
, panel
5B, and Fig. 2
, panel 5A). This was
again confirmed by a lack of TUNEL staining, which only detected
apoptotic cells in a necrotic area of a larger tumor. Other
radiation-induced changes in liver tumor cells were observed, such as
cytoplasmic and nuclear vacuolization, nuclear enlargement, and
hyperchromasia.
p53 expression was also undetectable in all of the 25 lung adenomas
examined from 11 untreated mice. In adenomas examined from 11 mice
treated with 4 (n = 11) or 8
(n = 8) Gy radiation, p53 protein remained
undetectable at 4 or 24 h (Fig. 1
, panel
5C). Cisplatin treatment also failed to induce p53, but very
weak p53 staining was observed in two of five lung adenomas from
etoposide-treated mice. Apoptotic cells were very infrequent (<0.5%)
in either untreated or treated lung adenomas at all of the time points
and dosages (Fig. 1
, panel 5D, and Fig. 2
,
panel 5B), which was confirmed by a lack of TUNEL
staining (data not shown). Thus, treatment of tumor-bearing mice with
DNA-damaging agents failed to induce measurable p53 or apoptosis in
adenomas of the liver or lung.
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An unresolved issue has been the biological basis for the tissue specificity of tumor suppression by p53, as measured by the tumor spectrum of p53 null mice and the frequency of somatic mutations in p53 in different tumor types. Although we measured only one aspect of p53 function, DNA- damage-induced accumulation of p53 and apoptosis, there was a good correlation between this measure of activity and tumor suppression by p53.
p53-/- knockout mice are highly prone to spontaneous lymphoma
development, with >70% developing lethal lymphomas by 6 months of age
(14
, 37 , 38)
. p53 +/- heterozygous mice are
also predisposed and frequent loss of the wild-type p53
allele in these tumors indicates there is strong selective pressure in
favor of cells with nonfunctional p53 (15
, 35
, 39)
.
Somatic mutations in p53 were detected in
15% of T-cell
lymphomas, which were induced by similar agents as in the present study
(40)
. Thus, lymphocytes and lymphoma cells are the most
sensitive to p53-mediated apoptosis, and p53 plays a prominent role in
lymphoma suppression.
In mice bearing intestinal adenomas, whole body radiation led to the induction of p53 expression and increased apoptosis. Does p53 play a role in intestinal tumorigenesis in mice? Although p53-/- mice are not prone to intestinal adenomas, recent studies, using a controlled genetic background, have revealed that adenomas from Min/+ p53-/- mice were slightly more numerous and tended to be more malignant as compared with those from Min/+ mice (41) . Mutations in the p53 gene were detected in 11% of chemically induced colon tumors in mice (42) . Therefore, loss of p53 provides a weak but measurable selective advantage during murine intestinal adenoma development.
p53 induction and apoptosis in response to whole body
irradiation
was also observed in mammary tumors. p53-deficient mice have
not shown a strong predisposition to spontaneous breast tumor
development, but if combined with MMTV-Wnt1 or
MMTV-ras transgenic models of mammary cancer, they did show
significantly decreased mammary tumor latency and/or increased tumor
progression (43
, 44)
. Using a protocol similar to that
used in our study, p53 mutations were not observed in
DMBA-induced primary mouse mammary tumors (45)
, but
mutations did accrue in preneoplastic outgrowths derived from mammary
epithelial cells cultured in vitro. Finally, mammary
epithelium transplanted from p53 null mice into wild-type
recipients formed tumors at high frequency (46)
. Thus, p53
does play a tumor-suppressing role in murine breast cancer, but this is
contingent on modifying genetic or environmental factors.
Squamous cell papillomas were in a class by themselves, in that p53 was expressed at fairly high levels in untreated tumors and was further induced by DNA-damaging treatments, but apoptosis was not induced. The prominent expression of p53 protein in DMBA/TPA-induced papillomas predicts a tumor-suppressing role for p53 in this tumor model. Mutations in p53 are not observed in DMBA/TPA-induced papillomas, but 2030% of carcinomas, which develop from papillomas, do have somatic biallelic mutations in p53 (47) . Also, in DMBA/TPA-treated p53-deficient mice, the rate and frequency of conversion of papillomas to carcinomas were greatly increased (16) . This indicates that p53 expression in papillomas has a potent tumor-suppressing phenotype, which is to inhibit malignant progression. However, the lack of a p53-dependent apoptotic response in papillomas suggests that other functions of p53 besides apoptosis, such as a role in G1 cell cycle arrest or differentiation, may be more critical for the suppression of malignant progression by p53.
Adenomas of the lung or liver were markedly resistant to both the induction of p53 and apoptosis by DNA-damaging treatments, which mirrors that of normal parenchymal cells from these tissues (12 , 48) . Thus, increased proliferation per se or oncogenic mutations associated with lung and liver adenoma formation are not sufficient to de-repress the p53 induction pathway. Adenomas of the lung and liver are among the most frequently observed tumor type in mice and, despite extensive analysis by several groups, mutations in p53 have rarely been found (18 , 19 , 49) . Furthermore, p53-deficient mice have not shown predisposition to either tumor type, even after tumor initiation with chemicals or radiation (15 , 17 , 39) . We suggest that the apparent lack of a tumor-suppressing role for p53 in these tumor types may be attributable to an inherent inability to induce p53 in the developing tumor cells, rendering p53 phenotypically silent. In support of this idea, when murine liver tumor cells were placed in tissue culture, they regained the ability to induce p53 expression, and cell lines established from these cultures frequently developed p53 mutations (18 , 50) .
In summary, the activity of the p53 induction-apoptosis pathway varies widely between tissues and tumor types when assayed in vivo. Variation in this activity roughly correlates with the known tissue specificity of tumor suppression by p53. In tissues or developing tumors in which p53 is inducible, such as lymphoid or skin, there is significant selective pressure in favor of cells with mutant p53. For tumors such as those of the mammary gland or intestine, tumor suppression by p53 may be more context-dependent, e.g., it may be latent under normal conditions but revealed under different genetic backgrounds or environmental conditions. In tissues or developing tumors in which the p53 pathway is less active or inactive, such as lung or liver tumors, there may be less selective pressure in favor of cells with mutant p53. Although the generality of this model remains to be demonstrated, a prediction is that tumors developing from tissues in which p53 is not inducible would rarely select for cells with mutant p53. Conversely, activation of the p53 pathway, which might occur because of genetic or physiological changes during tumor progression or because of environmental factors, would result in increased selective pressure in favor of cells with mutant p53.
With regard to the apoptotic response of tumor cells to genotoxic therapy, our results indicate striking variation between different tumor types. Lymphomas showed the strongest apoptotic response, which was p53 dependent. Mammary and intestinal tumors had an intermediate apoptotic response; the latter was also shown to be p53 dependent (36) . However, tumors of the skin, lung, and liver showed little or no therapy-induced apoptosis. Thus, the tenet that p53 controls the apoptotic sensitivity of tumors to chemotherapy is not universally applicable to all tumor types. We did not measure the long-term response of tumors to therapy. Given our results, it is likely that the role of p53 and apoptosis in tumor regression may also be tumor-type-dependent: prominent in lymphomas but less so in other tumor types. It remains to be shown whether therapy-induced p53 activation and apoptosis vary between autochthonous human tumor types as well, and if this has bearing on the response of these tumors to therapy.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was funded by a NIH research grant (to
C. J. K.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview
Avenue North, Seattle WA, 90109-1024. Phone: (206) 667-4252; Fax: (206)
667-5815; E-mail: cjkemp{at}fhcrc.org ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TUNEL, terminal
deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated nick end labeling; DMBA,
7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene; TPA,
12-0-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate; TX, treatment. ![]()
Received 5/19/00. Accepted 11/ 1/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-irradiation. Oncogene, 9: 1767-1773, 1994.[Medline]
-irradiation and N-methylnitrosourea. Cancer Res., 52: 3791-3795, 1992.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. M. Mroz, R. P. F. Schins, H. Li, L. A. Jimenez, E. M. Drost, A. Holownia, W. MacNee, and K. Donaldson Nanoparticle-driven DNA damage mimics irradiation-related carcinogenesis pathways Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2008; 31(2): 241 - 251. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. E. Gurley and C. J. Kemp Ataxia-Telangiectasia Mutated Is Not Required for p53 Induction and Apoptosis in Irradiated Epithelial Tissues Mol. Cancer Res., December 1, 2007; 5(12): 1312 - 1318. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Sun, Y. Mochizuki, and P. W. Majerus Inositol 1,3,4-Trisphosphate 5/6-Kinase Inhibits Tumor Necrosis Factor-induced Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., October 31, 2003; 278(44): 43645 - 43653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Ji, M. Nishizaki, B. Gao, D. Burbee, M. Kondo, C. Kamibayashi, K. Xu, N. Yen, E. N. Atkinson, B. Fang, et al. Expression of Several Genes in the Human Chromosome 3p21.3 Homozygous Deletion Region by an Adenovirus Vector Results in Tumor Suppressor Activities in Vitro and in Vivo Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2715 - 2720. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Lin and S. W. Lowe Oncogenic ras activates the ARF-p53 pathway to suppress epithelial cell transformation PNAS, April 12, 2001; (2001) 91100298. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
A. W. Lin and S. W. Lowe Oncogenic ras activates the ARF-p53 pathway to suppress epithelial cell transformation PNAS, April 24, 2001; 98(9): 5025 - 5030. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |