Cancer Research Landon Prizes for Basic and Translational Cancer Research  Tumor Immunology: New Perspectives
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vercoutter-Edouart, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hondermarck, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vercoutter-Edouart, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hondermarck, H.
[Cancer Research 61, 76-80, January 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Advances in Brief

Proteomic Analysis Reveals that 14-3-3{sigma} Is Down-Regulated in Human Breast Cancer Cells1

Anne-Sophie Vercoutter-Edouart2, Jérôme Lemoine2, Xuefen Le Bourhis, Hornez Louis, Bénoni Boilly, Victor Nurcombe, Françoise Révillion, Jean-Philippe Peyrat and Hubert Hondermarck3

Equipe Facteurs de Croissance, Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement, UPRES-EA 1033, Villeneuve d’Ascq, France [A-S. V-E., X. L. B., B. B., H. H.]; Laboratoire de Chimie Biologique, UMR 8576 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France [J. L.]; Laboratoire d’Oncologie Moléculaire Humaine, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer, de la région Nord-Pas de Calais (Centre Oscar Lambret), BP307, 59020 Lille, France [H. L., F. R., J-P. P.]; and Department of Anatomical Sciences, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia [V. N.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
The class of molecular chaperones known as 14-3-3 is involved in the control of cellular growth by virtue of its apparent regulation of various signaling pathways, including the Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway. In breast cancer cells, the {sigma} form of 14-3-3 has been shown to interact with cyclin-dependent kinases and to control the rate of entry into mitosis. To test for a direct role for 14-3-3 in breast epithelial cell neoplasia, we have quantitated 14-3-3 protein levels using a proteomic approach based on two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF). We show here that 14-3-3{sigma} protein is strongly down-regulated in the prototypic breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 and in primary breast carcinomas as compared with normal breast epithelial cells. In contrast, levels of the {alpha}, ß, {delta}, or {zeta} isoforms of 14-3-3 were the same in both normal and transformed cells. The data support the idea that 14-3-3{sigma} is involved in the neoplastic transition of breast epithelial cells by virtue of its role as a tumor suppressor; as such, it may constitute a robust marker with clinical efficacy for this pathology.


    Introduction
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Breast cancer is one of the leading causes of death among women, and the identification of new markers to discriminate tumorigenic from normal cells, as well as the different stages of this pathology, is of critical importance. The chaperone proteins designated 14-3-3 are a class of highly conserved proteins of 25–30 kDa expressed in all eukaryotic cells; they help to regulate signal transduction pathways controlling proliferation, differentiation, and survival (1) . They associate directly or indirectly with proliferative signal-transducing proteins such as PKC, MEK kinases, PI3-kinase and Raf. Raf-1 activation by 14-3-3 can lead to either cell cycle arrest or cell proliferation (1, 2, 3) . They are able to inhibit Cdc25c, thus controlling the entry of human cells into mitosis (4) . The {sigma} form of 14-3-3 seems to play a particular role in the control of such kinetics because its overexpression causes cell cycle arrest (5) . Most importantly, it has recently been shown that gene expression of 14-3-3{sigma} is silenced in breast cancer cells (6) and that transfection of breast cancer cells with 14-3-3{sigma} inhibits cyclin-dependent kinase activity, and thus cell cycle progression (7) , which suggests involvement of 14-3-3{sigma} in breast tumorigenesis. However, there is as yet no clear data that shows that 14-3-3 protein levels correlate directly with breast cell transformation. Here, we have used a proteomic approach to rigorously test the hypothesis that levels of 14-3-3 protein correlate with breast epithelial cell tumorigenesis and may, thus, constitute a robust new marker for its prognosis. Our results demonstrate that 14-3-3{sigma} protein level may indeed constitute such a marker and should be tested for clinical efficacy.


    Materials and Methods
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Cultures, Tissues, Metabolic Labeling, and Sample Preparation.
Human NBECs4 were established as described previously (8) from reduction mammoplasty (generous gift from Dr. Pellerin, Medical University of Lille, Lille, France). MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell line maintenance, metabolic labeling, and sample preparation were as described previously (9) . Briefly, preconfluent cells were labeled for 12 h with Trans 35S-label (ICN Biomedicals, Asse-Relegem, Belgium) at 50 µCi/ml. For nonlabeled protein preparations, cells were plated onto 100-mm dishes (Costar, Brumath, France) at 500,000 cells per 10 ml of complete medium and were starved for 24 h in serum-free medium when they reached preconfluence. After labeling, medium was removed, and the cells rinsed in ice-cold PBS. Cells were lysed on ice with lysis buffer (0.3% SDS and 1% 2ß-mercaptoethanol), centrifuged (2 min at 10,000 x g), and the supernatant diluted 1:2 with IEF buffer [9.5% (w/v) urea, 0.8% NP40, 10% 2ß-mercaptoethanol, 2% 3–10 and 4–8 ampholines and bromophenol blue]. The samples were snap-frozen and stored at -80°C. Primary breast tumor tissues were obtained immediately after surgical resection at the Center Oscar Lambret of Lille (Lille, France) and stored frozen at -80°C. About 1 mg of tissue was homogenized in five volumes of buffer [0.02 M Tris, 3 mM EDTA, 10 mM Na2MoO4, and 1 mM DTT (pH 7.4)]. The samples were centrifuged at 400 x g for 10 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was diluted 1:2 with IEF buffer. The concentration of proteins was determined using the Bio-Rad assay (Bio-Rad, Paris, France).

2-DE.
2-DE were performed as previously described (9) with the Investigator 2-D Electrophoresis System from Millipore (Paris, France); all of the reagents were purchased from Oxford Glycosystems (Abingdon, England). Ten to 30 µl of sample (containing 106 cpm for labeled proteins, or 50 µg proteins for nonlabeled samples) were separated by IEF in rod gels containing 2% pH 4–8 and 2% pH 3–10 carrier ampholytes. The separation was performed at 20,000 Vh (~1143 V over 17.5 h). After IEF, the strips were equilibrated twice for 2 min in 0.3 M Tris base [0.075 M Tris-HCl (pH 9.0), 3% SDS, 50 mM DTT, and 0.01% bromophenol blue]. The second dimensional separation was done using 10% SDS-PAGE for 5 h at 20,000 mW. After 2-DE, the proteins were detected by silver-staining, and the gels dried and autoradiographed (X-Omat AR Kodak; Sigma). For preparative 2-DE, 0.5–1 mg of protein were separated by IEF as described above. The gels were then equilibrated twice for 20 min in the equilibration buffer. After the second dimension, the gels were stained in 0.2% (w/v) Coomassie Blue in 50% methanol and 10% acetic acid.

Computer Analysis.
Both gels and autoradiographs were scanned (scanner SM3, Pharmacia) using the Diversity One program (Pharmacia) and were analyzed using the MELANIE II program (Bio-Rad) on a SUN-SPARC station. Molecular masses and pI were determined after comparison with reference gels in the SWISS-2DPAGE (Expasy) database.5

Protein Identification by MALDI-TOF.
Protein identification was performed as described previously (10 , 11) with modification. Spots were cut out from the gel and washed three times with 400 µl of a 125-mM ammonium carbonate/ACN 1:1 (v/v) solution for 20 min with shaking. The wash solution was discarded, and the pieces were dried at room temperature for 2 h. Enzymatic cleavage was initiated by reswelling the gel in ammonium carbonate solution (125 mM), whereupon 50 mM acetic acid was added and the digestion finally initiated by adding 50 mM acetic acid containing 7–7.5 units of trypsin (Promega, Lyon, France). After absorption of the protease solution, aliquots (5 µl) of pure water were added sequentially. The gel slices were placed in an Eppendorf tube and a minimum volume of water was added to totally immerse the gel pieces. The digestion was carried for 12–16 h at 37°C. The liquid was collected and the resulting peptides recovered after two extractions with a solution containing 45% ACN/10% formic acid. To recover very hydrophobic peptides, a third extraction with 95% ACN/5% formic acid was performed. The extract was finally dried using a Speed Vac-concentrator (Savant).

MALDI-TOF analysis of trypsin digests was performed on a Vision 2000 (Finnigan, Bremen, Germany) reflector instrument in positive ion mode at an accelerating voltage of 6 kV. Peptides were resuspended in CH3CN/H2O (1:1) containing 0.5% formic acid of which 0.5 µl was mixed directly onto the target with 1 µl of 2,5 dihydroxybenzoic acid matrix solution (10 mg/ml in CH3OH/H2O, 7:3). Between 30 and 50 laser shots were accumulated to obtain a final spectrum. Mass measurements were then made after peak smoothing and internal calibration using the average mass of the two autolysis trypsin fragment ions at m/z 843.014 and 2212.425, resulting in mass accuracy better than 0.3 Da. Protein sequence database searching was performed using MS-Fit6 using the average molecular weight of [M+H]+ peptide ions.


    Results
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
Proteomic Determination of Breast Proteins.
A proteomic approach was used to examine the levels of protein expression of the different forms of 14-3-3 in normal and tumorigenic breast epithelial cells. Fig. 1Citation illustrates the 2-DE separation of 35S-proteins from primary culture of NBECs. More than 1000 polypeptides were detected on autoradiograms and localized in pI 4–8 and molecular mass range 20–200 kDa. Computer analysis of the autoradiograms allowed determination of molecular masses and isoelectric point after comparison with standard 2-DE gels of the Swiss-2DPAGE database. In total, we were able to identify 50 spots (corresponding to 35 different proteins) in 2-DE gels using MALDI-TOF analysis; the positions of some of the identified proteins are shown in Fig. 1Citation . All of the identified spots can be considered as abundant proteins, because they are detectable with Coomassie Blue. For each identified protein, >50% of the trypsin-generated fragments matched with theoretical masses. For example, in case of annexin III, 14 fragments were generated by trypsin digestion, and the mass of 8 of them matched with the theoretical masses obtained for annexin III tryptic fragments in sequence database. Some of these proteins, such as the cytoskeletal elements actin, {alpha}-actinin, ß-tubulin, vimentin, and tropomyosins, have already been described in breast cancer cells. Some signal-related proteins (annexins, numatrin, rho GDI) were also detected.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Proteomic profiling of NBECs. 2-DE was performed with Trans 35S-proteins. Molecular masses (ordinate, in kDa) and pI (abscissa) values were determined from human gels in the SWISS-Prot database. The major proteins were determined by MALDI-TOF after trypsin digestion. anx, annexin; CK, cytokeratins; calx, calnexin; crtc, calreticulin; GRP, glucose-regulated protein; GST, glutathione S-transferase; G3PDH, glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase; HSP, heat-shock proteins; LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; PCNA, proliferating cell nuclear antigen; PDI, protein disulfide isomerase; PGM, phosphoglycerate mutase; Rho GDI, rho GTP-dissociation inhibitor 1; SODM, superoxide dismutase; TCTP, transcriptionally controlled tumor protein; thio. peroxidase, thioredoxin peroxidase; TM, tropomyosin; vim,vimentin. Framed area, area of the gel used as the basis for Fig. 3Citation .

 
Characterization and Quantification of the 14-3-3 Proteins.
The spots corresponding to the expected positions for 14-3-3 [between 15 and 35 kDa (pH 4–5)], not previously reported for breast epithelial cells, were also isolated and then subjected to trypsin digestion and MALDI-TOF. Several members of the 14-3-3 protein family were identified. The MALDI-TOF spectra obtained after trypsin digestion are shown in Fig. 2Citation and allow the characterization of {alpha}/ß, {delta}/{zeta}, and {sigma} forms. The masses of the tryptic fragments of 14-3-3{sigma} that were used for the identification are reported in Table 1Citation . After database searching, matching masses represent more than 60% of the fragment masses obtained, with a difference between measured and calculated masses below 0.2 Da. The isoform {alpha}/ß represents different levels of phosphorylation of the same protein, as does the isoform {delta}/{zeta} (1) ; this presumably explains the elongated form observed for the spots corresponding to these isoforms in 2-DE gels.



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. MALDI-TOF peptide-mass fingerprint spectrum of the tryptic digest of 14-3-3 proteins. {alpha}/ß form (A), {delta}/{zeta} form (B), and {sigma} form (C) of human breast epithelial cells. *, the trypsin autolytic fragments.

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1 MALDI-TOF identification of 14-3-3{sigma}

The tryptic fragment masses (indicated in daltons) that were obtained and their corresponding match to theoretical masses are listed (Fig. 2)Citation . The amino acid sequences were deduced from the tryptic fragments after database searching.

 
The distribution of these isoforms in NBECs, in the prototypical cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231, and in three representative primary tumors are shown in Fig. 3Citation , and their quantitation is shown in Fig. 4Citation . The isoforms {alpha}/ß and {delta}/{zeta} of 14-3-3 showed no significant variation in their expression, whereas the {sigma} isoform, detected as a major spot in normal breast cells, was clearly down-regulated in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells as well as in breast carcinomas. Careful examination of the spot reveals two forms of 14-3-3{sigma} that migrate differently in IEF, which suggests that it is subject to different levels of phosphorylation as has been described for the {alpha}/ß and {delta}/{zeta} forms (1) . The fact that several proteins shown in Fig. 1Citation are missing in Fig. 3Citation is attributable to differences in the method of protein visualization. Fig. 1Citation represents an autoradiogram (35S-proteins), whereas Fig. 3Citation depicts silver staining of the gel; differences in protein sensitivity to these two methods of display are usually observed. Fig. 5Citation shows the quantification of the 14-3-3{sigma} protein in 35 primary breast carcinomas compared with NBECs. The level of 14-3-3{sigma} reported for NBECs represents the average value (±SE) obtained from eight 2-DE gels produced from eight different samples. The level of 14-3-3{sigma} was found to be at an average of 10-fold lower in breast carcinomas than in NBECs. In all of the breast carcinomas studied, the quantity of 14-3-3{sigma} was down-regulated compared with normal breast epithelium and was not even detected in 5 of 35 samples.



View larger version (34K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Two-dimensional silver-stained gel portions encompassing 14-3-3 proteins obtained from different cell types. A, NBECs; B, MCF-7; C, MDA-MB-231; D–F, representative primary breast tumors.

 


View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Quantitation of the levels of 14-3-3 spot intensity in NBECs and in the MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines seen in Fig. 3Citation . The two-dimensional gels were scanned at high resolution and analyzed with Melanie II software.

 


View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Quantitation of the levels of 14-3-3{sigma} in primary tumors. The two-dimensional gels obtained for each of the 35 primary tumor samples were scanned at high resolution and analyzed with Melanie II software.

 

    Discussion
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 
In this study we have used proteomic profiling of human breast epithelial cells by 2-DE and mass spectrometry to establish that the {sigma} form of the 14-3-3 protein is down-regulated in breast cancer cells as compared with NBECs. Because these proteins are modulators of transduction signals related to cellular growth, our results suggest that this down-regulation contributes to the deregulation of growth observed in breast cancer. The hypothesis that 14-3-3{sigma} may constitute a marker for the discrimination of noncancerous from cancerous breast epithelial cells is thus supported by the study.

The widely expressed and highly conserved protein forms of 14-3-3 ({alpha}, ß, {delta}, {sigma}, {zeta}) help regulate those signaling pathways that control cell proliferation, differentiation, and survival (1) . They are known to associate directly or indirectly with such signaling proteins as Raf, MEK kinase, PI3-kinase, and cdc-25, although the precise molecular mechanism by which 14-3-3 proteins regulate these elements remains unclear (1) . Recently, Tzivion et al. (2) and Roy et al. (3) have shown that Raf activation requires formation of a complex containing Raf and 14-3-3 forms, and that the cellular levels of 14-3-3 have a significant impact on the control of Raf-1 activity. Varying levels of Raf-1, MEK kinase, PI3-kinase, and cdc-25 activation may account for the ability of 14-3-3 to induce either cell cycle arrest or cell proliferation (1 , 4 , 5 , 12) . Together these data strongly suggest that certain levels of 14-3-3 expression are critical for the control of cell growth, and that the down-regulation of 14-3-3{sigma} observed in breast cancer cells is involved in the neoplastic transformation.

Interestingly, we have shown here that the amounts of the {alpha}, ß, {zeta}, and {delta} forms of 14-3-3 do not significantly vary between normal and cancer cells, which suggests that it is only the regulation of the {sigma} form of 14-3-3 that is related to neoplastic transformation. In keratinocytes and in bladder, the expression of 14-3-3{sigma} is lower in transformed cells than in normal cells (13 , 14) , although other forms of 14-3-3 were not monitored. The {sigma} form of 14-3-3 is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2-M progression, and its overexpression can cause cell cycle arrest (5) . In addition, it is able to both up-regulate cdc2 phosphorylation via Wee1 (15) and down-regulate cdc25c (4) , thus controlling the entry of cells into mitosis by maintaining the G2 checkpoint (16) . Recently it was also demonstrated that 14-3-3{sigma} directly associates with cyclin-dependent kinases to negatively regulate cell cycle progression (7) . Gene expression of 14-3-3{sigma} was found to be 7- to 10-fold lower in breast cancer cells than in normal breast cells (6 , 17) because of the high frequency of hypermethylation of the 14-3-3{sigma} locus (6) . We found here that the 14-3-3{sigma} protein is present in breast cancer biopsies at a level that is at an average of 10-fold lower than in NBECs. Interestingly, Fergusson et al. (6) have reported that mRNA for 14-3-3{sigma} was undetectable by Northern blot analysis in 45 of 48 primary breast carcinomas studied; in contrast, we have detected the 14-3-3{sigma} protein in 30 of 35 primary tumor samples, which indicates the high sensitivity provided by proteomic analysis. The higher level of 14-3-3{sigma} in NBECs may, therefore, contribute to the prevention of the high cellular proliferation characteristic of the transformed phenotype.

Like breast cancer cells, NBECs express specific tyrosine kinase receptors for peptides such as NGF (18) and FGF-2 (19) . Both NGF and FGF-2 activate the Ras/Raf/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in breast cancer cells, which results in stimulation of the cell proliferation (18 , 20) . However, neither NGF nor FGF-2 has a mitogenic effect on NBECs (18 , 21) . Paradoxically, therefore, NBECs express both NGF and FGF receptors but do not proliferate in response to either cognate factor. The reason for the lack of sensitivity to these mitogens is not understood, but the growing body of evidence implicating 14-3-3{sigma} involvement in cell cycle progression suggests that the high level that we have found in normal cells may block the mitogenic effect of such growth factors. These data support the idea that the expression of 14-3-3{sigma} in NBECs participates in the control of cellular growth by preventing proliferation, whereas in breast cancer cells the down-regulation in 14-3-3{sigma} allows growth factor stimulation and cell cycle progression.

This study also confirms that proteomic analysis is a powerful tool for the discovery of such molecular markers. Complementing the burgeoning field of genomics, proteomic analysis allows the characterization of picoquantities of proteins with mass spectrometry and, thus, changes in the levels inherent to the pathophysiology of any cell type, tissue, or whole organism (22) . It has always been hoped that it would allow the identification of markers to discriminate cancerous from normal cells, as well as the different stages of this pathology. As demonstrated here, proteome analysis may well become central to the discovery of new indicators for the diagnosis and prognosis of cancer progression.

In conclusion, our data show a correlation between breast epithelial cell malignancy and down-regulation of 14-3-3{sigma}, which suggests the latter’s involvement in breast epithelial cell transformation. This protein form, therefore, qualifies as a marker for the noncancerous state of breast epithelial cells.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Médicale, the Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, Contrat 5360, the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer, Comité du Nord, the French Ministry of Education, and the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. Back

2 A-S. V-E. and J. L. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at UPRES-EA 1033 de Biologie du Développement, bâtiment SN3, Université de Lille1, 59650 Villeneuve d’Ascq Cedex, France. Phone: 33-3-20-43-40-97; Fax: 33-3-20-43-40-38; E-mail: Hubert.Hondermarck{at}univ-lille1.fr Back

4 The abbreviations used are: NBEC, normal breast epithelial cell; 2-DE, two-dimensional electrophoresis; ACN, acetonitrile; IEF, isoelectric focusing; MALDI-TOF, matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight; NGF, nerve growth factor; FGF, fibroblast growth factor. Back

5 Internet address: http://expasy.hcuge.ch/ch2d/ch2d-top.html. Back

6 Internet address: http://prospector.ucsf.edu/htmlucsf3.0/msfit.htm. Back

Received 5/25/00. Accepted 11/13/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 Introduction
 Materials and Methods
 Results
 Discussion
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Aitken A. 14-3-3 and its possible role in co-ordinating multiple signalling pathways. Trends Cell Biology, 6: 341-347, 1996.[Medline]
  2. Tzivion G., Luo Z., Avruch J. A dimeric 14-3-3 protein is an essential cofactor for Raf kinase activity. Nature (Lond.), 394: 88-92, 1998.[Medline]
  3. Roy S., McPherson R. A., Appoloni A., Yan J., Lane A., Clyde-Smith J., Hancok J. F. 14-3-3 facilitates Ras-dependent Raf-1 activation in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 3947-3955, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Peng C. Y., Graves P. R., Thomas R. S., Wu Z., Shaw A. S., Piwnica-Worms H. Mitotic and G2 checkpoint control: regulation of 14-3-3 protein binding by phosphorylation of Cdc25C on serine-216. Science (Washington DC), 277: 1501-1505, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hermeking H., Lengauer C., Polyak K., He T. C., Zhang L., Thiagalingam S., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. 14-3-3{sigma} is a p53-regulated inhibitor of G2/M progression. Mol. Cell, 1: 3-11, 1997.[Medline]
  6. Ferguson A. T., Evron E., Umbricht C. B., Pandita T. K., Chan T. A., Hermeking H., Marks J. R., Lambers A. R., Futreal P. A., Stampfer M. R., Sukumar S. High frequency of hypermethylation at the 14-3-3{sigma} locus leads to gene silencing in breast cancer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 6049-6054, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Laronga C., Yang H. Y., Neal C., Lee M. H. Association of the cyclin-dependent kinases and 14-3-3{sigma} negatively regulates cell cycle progression. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 23106-23112, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Dong-Lebourhis X., Berthois Y., Millot G., Degeorges A., Sylvi M., Martin P. M., Calvo F. Effect of stromal and epithelial cells derived from normal and tumorous breast tissue on the proliferation of human breast cancer cell lines in co-culture. Int. J. Cancer, 71: 42-48, 1997.[Medline]
  9. Hondermarck H., McLaughlin C. S., Patterson S. D., Bradshaw R. A. Early changes in protein synthesis induced by basic fibroblast growth factor, nerve growth factor, and epidermal growth factor in PC12 pheochromocytoma cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 91: 9377-9381, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Henzel W. J., Billeci T. M., Stults J. T., Wong S. C. Identifying proteins from two-dimensional gels by molecular mass searching of peptide fragments in protein sequence databases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 5011-5015, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shevchenko A., Jensen O. N., Podtelejnikov A. V., Saglioco F., Wilm M., Vorm O., Mortensen P., Shevchenko A., Boucherie H., Mann M. Linking genome and proteome by mass spectrometry: large-scale identification of yeast proteins from two dimensional gels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 93: 14440-14445, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Sewing A., Wiseman B., Lloyd A., Land H. High-intensity Raf signal causes cell cycle arrest mediated by p21Cip1. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 5588-5597, 1997.[Abstract]
  13. Leffers H., Madsen P., Rasmussen H. H., Honore B., Andersen A. H., Walbum E., Vandekerckhove J., Celis J. E. Molecular cloning and expression of the transformation sensitive epithelial marker stratifin. J. Mol. Biol., 231: 982-998, 1993.[Medline]
  14. Ostergaard M., Rasmussen H. H., Nielsen H. V., Vorum H., Orntoft T. F., Wolf H., Celis J. E. Proteome profiling of bladder squamous cell carcinomas: identification of markers that define their degree of differentiation. Cancer Res., 57: 4111-4117, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Wang Y., Jacobs C., Hook K. E., Duan H., Booher R. N., Sun Y. Binding of 14-3-3ß to the carboxyl terminus of Wee1 increases Wee1 stability, kinase activity, and G2-M cell population. Cell Growth Differ., 11: 211-219, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Chan T. A., Hermeking H., Lengauer C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. 14-3-3{sigma} is required to prevent mitotic catastrophe after DNA damage. Nature (Lond.), 401: 616-620, 1999.[Medline]
  17. Prasad G. L., Valverius E. M., McDuffie E., Cooper H. L. Complementary DNA cloning of a novel epithelial cell marker protein, HME1, that may be down-regulated in neoplastic mammary cells. Cell Growth Differ., 3: 507-513, 1992.[Abstract]
  18. Descamps S., Le Bourhis X., Delehedde M., Boilly B., Hondermarck H. Nerve growth factor is mitogenic for cancerous but not normal human breast epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 16659-16662, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Luqmani Y. A., Graham M., Coombes R. C. Expression of basic fibroblast growth factor, FGFR1, and FGFR2 in normal and malignant human breast, and comparison with other normal tissues. Br. J. Cancer, 66: 273-280, 1992.[Medline]
  20. Liu F. J., Chevet E., Kebache S., Lemaitre G., Barritault D., Larose L., Crepin M. Functional Rac-1 and Nck signaling networks are required for FGF-2-induced DNA synthesis in MCF-7 cells. Oncogene, 18: 6425-6433, 1999.[Medline]
  21. Li S., Shipley G. D. Expression of multiple species of basic fibroblast growth factor mRNA and protein in normal and tumor-derived mammary epithelial cells in culture. Cell Growth Differ., 2: 195-202, 1991.[Abstract]
  22. Ünlü M. Proteomics. Biochem. Soc. Trans., 27: 547-559, 1999.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. M. A. Moreira, T. Shen, G. Ohlsson, P. Gromov, I. Gromova, and J. E. Celis
A Combined Proteome and Ultrastructural Localization Analysis of 14-3-3 Proteins in Transformed Human Amnion (AMA) Cells: Definition of A Framework to Study Isoform-Specific Differences
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2008; 7(7): 1225 - 1240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
F. Vandermoere, I. E. Yazidi-Belkoura, Y. Demont, C. Slomianny, J. Antol, J. Lemoine, and H. Hondermarck
Proteomics Exploration Reveals That Actin Is a Signaling Target of the Kinase Akt
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, January 1, 2007; 6(1): 114 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
F. Bertucci, D. Birnbaum, and A. Goncalves
Proteomics of Breast Cancer: Principles and Potential Clinical Applications
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2006; 5(10): 1772 - 1786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
F. Vandermoere, I. El Yazidi-Belkoura, C. Slomianny, Y. Demont, G. Bidaux, E. Adriaenssens, J. Lemoine, and H. Hondermarck
The Valosin-containing Protein (VCP) Is a Target of Akt Signaling Required for Cell Survival
J. Biol. Chem., May 19, 2006; 281(20): 14307 - 14313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. L. Ramirez, R. Rosell, M. Taron, M. Sanchez-Ronco, V. Alberola, R. de las Penas, J. M. Sanchez, T. Moran, C. Camps, B. Massuti, et al.
14-3-3{sigma} Methylation in Pretreatment Serum Circulating DNA of Cisplatin-Plus-Gemcitabine-Treated Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients Predicts Survival: The Spanish Lung Cancer Group
J. Clin. Oncol., December 20, 2005; 23(36): 9105 - 9112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. G. Hodgson, T. Malek, S. Bornstein, S. Hariono, D. G. Ginzinger, W. J. Muller, and J. W. Gray
Copy Number Aberrations in Mouse Breast Tumors Reveal Loci and Genes Important in Tumorigenic Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Signaling
Cancer Res., November 1, 2005; 65(21): 9695 - 9704.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
L. Espana, B. Martin, R. Aragues, C. Chiva, B. Oliva, D. Andreu, and A. Sierra
Bcl-xL-Mediated Changes in Metabolic Pathways of Breast Cancer Cells: From Survival in the Blood Stream to Organ-Specific Metastasis
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 1125 - 1137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
E. W. Wilker, R. A. Grant, S. C. Artim, and M. B. Yaffe
A Structural Basis for 14-3-3{sigma} Functional Specificity
J. Biol. Chem., May 13, 2005; 280(19): 18891 - 18898.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
J. M. A. Moreira, G. Ohlsson, F. E. Rank, and J. E. Celis
Down-regulation of the Tumor Suppressor Protein 14-3-3{sigma} Is a Sporadic Event in Cancer of the Breast
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, April 1, 2005; 4(4): 555 - 569.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
H. Alexander, A. L. Stegner, C. Wagner-Mann, G. C. Du Bois, S. Alexander, and E. R. Sauter
Proteomic Analysis to Identify Breast Cancer Biomarkers in Nipple Aspirate Fluid
Clin. Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 10(22): 7500 - 7510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. K. Dougherty and D. K. Morrison
Unlocking the code of 14-3-3
J. Cell Sci., April 15, 2004; 117(10): 1875 - 1884.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
F. M. Selaru, J. Yin, A. Olaru, Y. Mori, Y. Xu, S. H. Epstein, F. Sato, E. Deacu, S. Wang, A. Sterian, et al.
An Unsupervised Approach to Identify Molecular Phenotypic Components Influencing Breast Cancer Features
Cancer Res., March 1, 2004; 64(5): 1584 - 1588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
S. Desrivieres, T. Prinz, N. Castro-Palomino Laria, M. Meyer, G. Boehm, U. Bauer, J. Schafer, T. Neumann, C. Shemanko, and B. Groner
Comparative Proteomic Analysis of Proliferating and Functionally Differentiated Mammary Epithelial Cells
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2003; 2(10): 1039 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
A. Sugiyama, Y. Miyagi, Y. Komiya, N. Kurabe, C. Kitanaka, N. Kato, Y. Nagashima, Y. Kuchino, and F. Tashiro
Forced expression of antisense 14-3-3{beta} RNA suppresses tumor cell growth in vitro and in vivo
Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2003; 24(9): 1549 - 1559.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
H. Hondermarck
Breast Cancer: When Proteomics Challenges Biological Complexity
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, May 1, 2003; 2(5): 281 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
P. G. Buckley, K. K. Mantripragada, M. Benetkiewicz, I. Tapia-Paez, T. Diaz de Stahl, M. Rosenquist, H. Ali, C. Jarbo, C. de Bustos, C. Hirvela, et al.
A full-coverage, high-resolution human chromosome 22 genomic microarray for clinical and research applications
Hum. Mol. Genet., December 1, 2002; 11(25): 3221 - 3229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. R. Srinivas, S. Srivastava, S. Hanash, and G. L. Wright Jr
Proteomics in Early Detection of Cancer
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2001; 47(10): 1901 - 1911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vercoutter-Edouart, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hondermarck, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vercoutter-Edouart, A.-S.
Right arrow Articles by Hondermarck, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online