| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Surgical Metabolic Research Laboratory, Lundberg Laboratory for Cancer Research, Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-6 receptor (gp130), IL-1 receptor I, and cyclooxygenase (Cox)-2 protein in brain cortex, hippocampus and the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMH) in tumor-bearing mice with prostanoid-related anorexia. Pair-fed non-tumor-bearing mice were used as controls. Prostaglandin E2 was provided systemically to freely fed, non-tumor-bearing mice to confirm a role for prostanoids in modulation of brain cytokines and food intake.
Time course changes of IL-1ß were significantly different between tumor-bearing mice and pair-fed controls in the hippocampus but not in the VMH. TNF-
in the hippocampus and VMH did not show any significant difference between tumor-bearing mice and pair-fed controls, whereas TNF-
showed a small increase over time in brain VMH. IL-6 content did not show any significant alterations among tumor-bearing and pair-fed mice but increased significantly over time in both the study and control group. Cox-2 in brain hippocampus and VMH showed a statistically significant rise in both tumor-bearing and pair-fed controls, with no difference between animal groups. Systemic provision of exogenous PGE2 to non-tumor-bearing mice altered brain cytokines significantly in the hippocampus and VMH with associated changes in food intake. Our results demonstrate that some differences (IL-1ß) occurred in brain cytokines comparing tumor-bearing and pair-fed, non-tumor-bearing mice but within unexpected decreased levels in brain tissue from tumor-bearing mice. Surprisingly, many time course changes in brain cytokines were similarly altered in tumor-bearing and pair-fed mice. Our observations do not support that up-regulation of brain cytokines explains or promotes anorexia in cancer disease. Rather, cytokine and Cox-dependent alterations in brain tissue seemed to be secondary to a decline in food intake and related to subsequent stress hormone activities.
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, and IL-6, are mediators of cachexia (3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)
, there is circumstantial evidence that brain cytokines are also important together with neurotransmitters and neurotrophic factors in mediating anorexia in tumor disease. IL-1ß has been reported to induce anorexia after intracerebroventricular injections (13, 14, 15, 16)
, and a positive correlation between food intake and IL-1
concentrations in cerebrospinal fluid was observed in anorectic tumor-bearing rats (17)
, whereas intra-VMH injections of an IL-1 receptor antagonist improved food intake (17)
. Accordingly, up-regulation of IL-1ß mRNA in brain tissue may be a significant factor behind anorexia in tumor-bearing rats (18)
. Unlike IL-1ß, TNF-
and IL-6 had only short-term anorectic effects when injected intracerebroventricularly, and tolerance was developed after repeated injections (19
, 20) . Anorectic effects of IL-1 may be mediated by prostaglandins based on the observation that pretreatment with ibuprofen completely blocked anorectic effects of IL-1 (21)
. Cox-2, an inducible Cox, exists extensively in brain tissue and was up-regulated in rodent brain in response to systemic administration of bacterial lipopolysaccharide (22
, 23)
. Thus, the expression of cytokines and corresponding receptors in relationship to Cox-2 expression in various brain areas may be important for the development and progression of tumor-induced anorexia. Therefore, the present study has evaluated time course changes of brain cytokines and Cox-2 in a tumor model with cytokine- and prostanoid-dependent anorexia. | MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor-bearing Mice.
Sixty-three mice were divided into four groups with tumor-bearing (n = 21), pair-fed non-tumor-bearing controls (n = 21), freely fed healthy non-tumor-bearing controls (n = 10), and baseline controls (n = 11). With light anesthesia (Ketalar, Rompun i.p.), mice were implanted s.c. bilaterally in the flanks on day 0 with 35 mm3 of a transplantable methylcholanthrene-induced sarcoma (MCG101). Pair-fed control mice underwent a sham operation and were pair-fed to match the food intake in tumor-bearing mice with free access to tap water as described (24)
. Freely fed healthy control mice were housed under similar conditions as tumor-bearing mice but were given free access to laboratory rodent chow and tap water. Daily food intake and body weight were registered between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. Eleven mice in the baseline control group were killed 3 days later after being placed on a wire floor to determine day 0 values of cytokines, gp130, IL-1RI, and Cox-2 in immunohistochemical image analyses. Tumor-bearing and pair-fed mice were sacrificed in subgroups of seven on days 4, 7, and 14. Blood samples were obtained by cardiac puncture after anesthesia. The brains were immediately fixed in situ by perfusion. The vascular bed was rinsed by 20 ml of saline through the left ventricle of the heart, followed by perfusion with 20 ml of 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). The brains were rapidly removed and fixed in buffered 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 2024 h after perfusion and in situ fixation. The samples were paraffin embedded and cut into 8-µm sections for immunohistochemical staining analysis. The sections were allocated between interaural line 2.46 and 1.86 mm, bregma -1.34 and -1.94 mm, according to The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates (25)
. The VMH was verified by Wright hematoxylin staining under microscope.
PGE2 Provision to Non-Tumor-bearing Mice.
Non-tumor-bearing mice received a micro-osmotic pump (ALZET 1007D) placed in the peritoneal cavity. The pump released PGE2 (high dose, 1872 µg/100 µl, n = 13; or low dose, 312 µg/100 µl, n = 4) or vehicle (n = 13) at a rate of 0.5 µl/h. Food intake and body weight were recorded daily between 8:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. (24)
. On day 7, blood samples and brains were treated as described above for determination of PGE2 as well as IL-6 in blood and immunohistochemical determination of cytokines and Cox-2 expression in brain tissue (four mice in each subgroup). Animals were killed on days 0, 2, 4, and 7 for measurements of PGE2 and IL-6 in blood determined as described below. Brain cytokines and Cox-2 analyses were performed as described for tumor-bearing mice.
Immunohistochemical Staining.
Immunohistochemical staining protocols were optimized. Primary antibodies were diluted in 1% TBS-BSA containing 0.1% saponin in 1:10 monoclonal rat antimouse IL-6 (PharMingen 18082D), monoclonal rat antimouse TNF-
(PharMingen 18131D), monoclonal rat antimouse IL-1RI (Serotec MCA1760Z), 1:40 multiclonal goat antimouse IL-1ß (R&D AF-401-NA), polyclonal rabbit anti-IL-6R
(gp130; rat/mouse; Research Diagnostics RDI-RTILRAabr), and 1:100 polyclonal goat antihuman COX-2 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology 1746) and incubated overnight (20 h) at room temperature after nonspecific binding blocking by 5% BSA. Biotinylated rabbit antirat IgG (Dako E0468), biotinylated rabbit antigoat IgG (Dako E0466), and biotinylated swine antirabbit IgG (Dako E0353) were used as the secondary antibody, diluted in 1% TBS-BSA with 0.1% saponin 1:300 and neutralized with normal mouse serum 1:10 for at least 4 h in 4°C before use. The secondary antibody was incubated 30 min at room temperature. StreptABComplex/AP (Dako K0391) was used as developing system, and 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate/nitroblue tetrazolium (Dako K0598) was used as a substrate. All incubations and washings were processed in the presence of 0.1% saponin in TBS. Negative controls were either normal serum or IgG from the same species as the primary antibodies.
Immunohistochemical Image Analysis.
IL-1ß, TNF-
, IL-6, IL-6R
(gp130), IL-1RI, and Cox-2 expression were examined in the brain hippocampus and VMH region by immunohistochemical image analysis. The hippocampus region included the CA1, CA2, and CA3 field. Fifteen fields were taken under x40 amplification along the pyramidal layer. The dentate gyrus was not included in the analysis. The region of interest in VMH was defined by Wright hematoxylin staining in a sequential section, and immunostained sections were analyzed under x10 amplification.
The stained sections were read under light microscopy (Nikon E400), and 15 pictures on the hippocampus were grabbed in each section at x40 magnification by a Sony color video camera (SSC CD18P) and saved as Tiff files. The image analysis was performed by a Macintosh computer using the public domain NIH image program (V1.61/fat).5
After spatial calibration, gray-scale 61 was used as a threshold in calculation of positive area. The positive area was expressed as a percentage of the total area in the field (positive area %), from the microphotograph with the quality shown in Fig. 1
. The change in brain cytokines gp130, IL-1RI, and Cox-2 content over time was expressed as a relative change compared with measurements in mice represented by day 0 values:
![]() |
|
Statistics.
Results are presented as mean ± SE. Time course changes of food intake, carcass weight, and brain cytokines among animal groups were compared by using a two-way ANOVA for repeated measures. Statistics are presented for differences between groups, changes over time, and for interactions between group and time. P
0.05 was considered statistically significant, and P < 0.10 was considered a trend to significance. Correlation between PGE2 and tumor weight was calculated by the Spearman rank method.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
in the brain hippocampus and VMH did not show any significant difference between tumor-bearing mice and pair-fed controls, whereas TNF-
alterations over time showed a significant increase in VMH (Fig. 5)
|
|
|
) and IL-1RI is presented in Fig. 7
|
|
) in the cortex, hippocampus, and VMH (Fig. 10)
showed a significant difference in the cortex between the study and the sham group only, whereas the changes over time were significantly altered in both the hippocampus and VMH areas.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, IL-6R
, IL-1RI, and Cox-2) in the hippocampus and the VMH nucleus from inbred C57 bl mice s.c. implanted with a tumor (MCG101) promoting cytokine- and prostanoid-related anorexia/cachexia. This tumor model has been extensively characterized metabolically, and tumor-host alterations are in several aspects similar to metabolic alterations observed in unselected weight-losing cancer patients (43)
. We have found that carcass weight loss in tumor-bearing mice is closely related to alterations in food intake, which were all attenuated by cyclooxygenase inhibition (26
, 35
, 44)
. Pair-feeding and pair-weighted experiments in non-tumor-bearing mice have demonstrated that a majority of observed tumor-host alterations could be mimicked by a primary decline in food intake (adaptations to starvation; Refs. 24
and 45
), although some differences that may be tumor related were observed (36)
. For example, resting energy expenditure in our tumor-bearing mice showed a different diurnal rhythm compared with the metabolism in purely undernourished non-tumor-bearing mice (30)
. Also, a majority of tumor-related metabolic alterations could be provoked by i.p. or s.c. injection of bacterial antigens extracted from Corynebacterium parvum (46, 47, 48)
. We have also reported that several classic tumor-host related alterations are tightly coupled to well-recognized stress alteration in the pituitary/adrenal axes (33
, 49
, 50)
. For example, systemic inflammatory reactions in response to growth of the malignant tumor were highly dependent on the presence of the adrenals in mice (33
, 50)
. Thus, our previous work clearly demonstrates that tumor-host metabolism can be secondary to a primary decline of food intake, partly mediated by cytokines, prostanoids, and classic stress hormones, which all introduced secondary alteration in energy metabolism and hormone sensitivities.
On the basis of the above-mentioned evidence, we have now evaluated to what extent brain cytokines of tumor-bearing mice are differently related to brain cytokines in pair-fed, non-tumor-bearing mice. The experimental approach is thus similar to our previous investigations on metabolic alterations in liver and peripheral tissues of MCG101-bearing mice (24)
. The results in the present study confirm our previous findings that anorexia becomes significant 67 days after tumor implantation, and that carcass weight probably starts to decline somewhat earlier than food intake of MCG101-bearing mice (38)
. These repeatedly observed alterations suggest that the initial growth of a tumor can be sufficiently supported by redistribution of metabolic compounds (substrate and energy) within the host without introducing a strictly parallel attenuation of food intake. Thus, it is likely that anorexia becomes evident when the tumor compartment has reached a certain metabolic proportion of the entire host. Accordingly, it is still difficult to judge what the primary cause of anorexia is, tumor-related factors or being an adaptation to initial alteration in basal energy metabolism with stress hormone alterations. However, a clear cut difference between the tumor-host condition versus a pure state of underfeeding (pair-fed mice) is the observed increase in plasma PGE2 of tumor-bearing mice being highly correlated to the tumor burden (Fig. 2)
. This fact underlines that a state of progressive undernutrition in tumor-bearing hosts is a mixed condition with both systemic inflammation and pure undernutrition.
Our present experiments were designed to evaluate time course changes in brain peptides when expressed as a relative change versus baseline levels in the brain of freely fed, well-adapted, non-tumor-bearing mice (day 0, 100%). However, quantification of immune-histochemical alterations are usually subjected to a comparatively high degree of variation, particularly when performed on different groups of animals. Also, intersample variations occur. Therefore, we have focused on a statistical model with evaluation of changes over the entire experimental period, with the primary emphasis on differences between study and control mice. This approach may decrease the possibility to identify or confirm small but statistically significant differences among the tumor and the control groups. On the other hand, our approach will also decrease the risk for overinterpretation of suggestive changes appearing by chance. To compensate for a comparatively low sensitivity in the statistical analyses by comparing repeated samples over a 2-week period among study and control mice, we have also indicated statistical trends as well as significant interactions between groupings of animals and the observation time during the experiments. Several interesting observations were made. IL-1ß was the only cytokine with a statistically significant difference between tumor-bearing and pair-fed controls in any of the evaluated brain regions (hippocampus) but with unexpectedly low levels in tumor-bearing mice. TNF-
showed no difference between the groups, without any striking alterations over time. Also IL-6, which has earlier been identified as a significant cytokine behind alterations in peripheral tissue metabolism of tumor-bearing animals (27)
, did not show any difference between the groups, whereas there was a significant increase over time in VMH in at least tumor-bearing mice. Our findings suggest that brain cytokine metabolism seems to be more complex than the relationships reported in other tissues of tumor-bearing animals, where it is not unusual to observe a positive and proportionally increased relationship between elevated cytokine activity and altered tumor-host metabolism (51)
. The lack of comparatively pronounced alterations in brain cytokines in the present study was probably not explained by differences at the corresponding receptor levels, because no changes were found in gp130 (IL-6 receptor
) and the IL-1RI. However, Cox-2 increased in the hippocampus of both tumor-bearing and pair-fed controls with a similar pattern in brain VMH. Thus, our results do not agree with conclusions based on observations published previously that IL-1 receptor antagonists improve food intake in anorectic tumor-bearing animals (17)
.
To further evaluate our previous proposals of a relationship between prostanoid activity and tumor-host metabolism, PGE2 was provided by means of an i.p. micro-osmotic pump in non-tumor-bearing mice. These experiments confirmed that well-adapted mice are highly sensitive to stress reactions such as anesthesia and surgical manipulations, demonstrated by an initial decline to 10% of normal food intake in such animals (Fig. 9)
. However, food intake was most rapidly restored in sham injected controls compared with mice receiving PGE2. These experiments cannot represent or simulate a finely tuned physiological situation but reflect expected findings that systemic provision of PGE2 can be translated into influences on food intake with subsequent changes in body weight and agree with the findings that alterations in feeding may be related to Cox-2 expression in the brain. Moreover, these short-term but consistent findings were associated with significant alterations in IL-1ß and TNF-
in the cortex, hippocampus, and VMH (Fig. 10)
. Presently, the results from these simplified experiments with exogenous PGE2 provision cannot be interpreted in a physiologically meaningful way but demonstrate a possible link between prostanoid metabolism outside the brain barrier and cytokine expression inside the CNS. Thus, cytokines may not only control production of prostanoids in general, but systemically derived prostanoids can perhaps also control or at least influence the brain cytokine production (52)
. It is also possible that changes in cytokine production outside the CNS can be translated into Cox-2 alterations inside the CNS (Fig. 8)
. Such a bidirectional interplay, across the blood brain barrier between prostanoids and cytokines, reflects the complex situation between metabolic cascades in tissues and CNS (53)
.
The overall impression of our present study is that few differences occurred in brain cytokines in a tumor condition with host wasting compared with a condition with pure undernutrition. Thus, many directional changes in brain cytokines were similarly altered in tumor-bearing and pair-fed mice. These observations do not support that up-regulation of brain cytokines has a major role to elicit and promote anorexia in tumor-bearing mice. Rather, cytokine and Cox-dependent alterations seemed to be secondary to the decline in food intake and may represent adaptations to stress hormone secretion promoted by the partial starvation in tumor-bearing and pair-fed mice.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in parts by Grants 2014, 01PAA, and 4261 from the Swedish Cancer Society; Grants 08712, 13159, and 13268 from the Swedish Medical Research Council; and grants from the Tore Nilson Foundation, the Assar Gabrielsson Foundation (AB Volvo), the Jubileumskliniken Foundation, the IngaBritt and Arne Lundberg Research Foundation, the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, the Swedish and Göteborg Medical Societies, and the Medical Faculty, Göteborg University. ![]()
2 Present address: Serono International, Geneva, Switzerland. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, S-413 45 Göteborg, Sweden. Phone: 46-31-342-2239; Fax: 46-31-82-65-39; E-mail: Kent.Lundholm{at}surgery.gu.se ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: IL, interleukin; IL-1RI, IL-1 receptor I; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; VMH, ventromedial hypothalamus; Cox, cyclooxygenase; PGE2, prostaglandin E2; CNS, central nervous system. ![]()
5 Internet address: http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/. ![]()
Received 3/13/00. Accepted 4/13/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(cachectin) and the pathogenesis of cancer cachexia. Clin. Physiol., 7: 263-274, 1987.[Medline]
antibodies attenuate development of cachexia in tumor models. FASEB J., 3: 1956-1962, 1989.[Abstract]
and interleukin 1 for experimental tumor growth and the development of cancer cachexia. Cancer Res., 51: 415-421, 1991.
antibodies normalized body temperature and enhanced food intake in tumor-bearing rats. Am. J. Physiol., 265: R615-R619, 1993.
in anorectic tumor bearing rats. Neuroreport, 6: 750-752, 1995.[Medline]
. J. Surg. Res., 54: 70-78, 1993.[Medline]
and interleukin-1
production in cachectic, tumor-bearing mice. Int. J. Cancer, 46: 889-896, 1990.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Granado, A. I Martin, M{a} A. Villanua, and A. Lopez-Calderon Experimental arthritis inhibits the insulin-like growth factor-I axis and induces muscle wasting through cyclooxygenase-2 activation Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, June 1, 2007; 292(6): E1656 - E1665. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Pecchi, M. Dallaporta, S. Thirion, C. Salvat, F. Berenbaum, A. Jean, and J.-D. Troadec Involvement of central microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 in IL-1{beta}-induced anorexia Physiol Genomics, May 16, 2006; 25(3): 485 - 492. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Stenlof, I. Wernstedt, T. Fjallman, V. Wallenius, K. Wallenius, and J.-O. Jansson Interleukin-6 Levels in the Central Nervous System Are Negatively Correlated with Fat Mass in Overweight/Obese Subjects J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2003; 88(9): 4379 - 4383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z.-H. Zhang, S.-G. Wei, J. Francis, and R. B. Felder Cardiovascular and renal sympathetic activation by blood-borne TNF-alpha in rat: the role of central prostaglandins Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, April 1, 2003; 284(4): R916 - R927. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. B. Felder, J. Francis, Z.-H. Zhang, S.-G. Wei, R. M. Weiss, and A. K. Johnson Heart failure and the brain: new perspectives Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, February 1, 2003; 284(2): R259 - R276. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Reyes and P. E. Sawchenko Involvement of the Arcuate Nucleus of the Hypothalamus in Interleukin-1-Induced Anorexia J. Neurosci., June 15, 2002; 22(12): 5091 - 5099. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |