| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Molecular Medicine Research Institute, Mountain View, California 94043 [M. I. D., C. W. L., K-C. F., G-q. C.]; Retinoid Program, SRI, Menlo Park, California 94025 [P. D. H.]; Laboratory of Molecular Pharmacology, Oregon State University School of Pharmacy, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 [V. J. P., M. L.]; The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, California 92037 [J. G., H. L., S. K. K., X-k. Z.]; and John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan 48201 [Y. Z., J. A. F.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. The 3-chloro AHPN analogue MM11453 inhibited the growth of both retinoid-resistant (HL-60R leukemia, MDA-MB-231 breast, and H292 lung) and retinoid-sensitive (MCF-7 breast, LNCaP prostate, and H460 lung) cancer cell lines by inducing apoptosis at similar concentrations. Before apoptosis, MM11453 induced transcription factor TR3 expression and loss of mitochondrial membrane potential characteristic of apoptosis. MM11453 lacked the ability to significantly activate RARs and retinoid X receptor
to initiate (TREpal)2-tk-CAT reporter transcription. These results, differential proteolysis-sensitivity assays, and glutathione S-transferase-pulldown experiments demonstrate that, unlike AHPN or the natural or standard synthetic retinoids, MM11453 does not behave as a RAR or retinoid X receptor
transcriptional agonist. These studies strongly suggest that AHPN exerts its cell cycle arrest and apoptotic activity by a signaling pathway independent of retinoid receptor activation. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ß, and
(reviewed in Ref. 2
). Retinoids complexed to a RXR/RAR can activate or repress gene transcription from RA response elements in the promoter of retinoid-sensitive genes. A retinoid bound to an RXR can modulate activation by other transcription factors with which it dimerizes (2)
. Retinoid receptor-ligand complexes also compete with other transcription factors for coactivator proteins (3
, 4)
, whereas nonliganded dimers compete for corepressors (5)
. The diversity from the six subtypes and variations in their expression patterns (2 , 6, 7, 8, 9) , response element sequences, intermediary proteins, and other transcription factors (2) led to the identification of receptor-selective retinoids to enhance efficacy by reducing the systemic toxicity associated with retinoids activating all receptors (10) . Receptor class and subtype-selective compounds (reviewed in Refs. 1 and 11 ) also provide a means for studying individual receptor-signaling pathways.
On evaluating RAR
-selective retinoids, we observed that AHPN (CD437 [1] in Fig. 1
; Ref. 12
) rapidly caused detachment of retinoid-sensitive MCF-7 breast and NIH:OVCAR-3 ovarian cancer cells (13
, 14)
. This atypical retinoid activity extended to retinoid-resistant lines, including MDA-MB-231 breast cancer and HL-60R leukemia (13)
. AHPN induced cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1 expression (13)
, G0-G1 cell cycle arrest (13)
, and apoptotic events, such as caspase activation, gadd45 expression (15)
, poly(adenosyl diphosphate-ribose) polymerase cleavage, and DNA fragmentation (13)
. Interestingly, apoptosis occurred in the absence of functional tumor suppressor p53 (13)
, the gene for which is mutated in many cancers (16)
. Apoptosis by AHPN and its derivatives and analogues was subsequently observed in other lines derived from tumors and their metastases (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25)
.
|
did not cause the conformational changes of AHPN that led to corepressor loss and coactivator recruitment. We report here the characterization and anticancer activity of MM11453, the prototype for new nonretinoidal apoptotic agents with potential for cancer treatment. | MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
): 1.75, 2.06, 2.17 (s, 6, adamantyl CH2; s, 3, adamantyl CH; s, 6, adamantyl CH2), 6.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1, ArH-5), 7.51 (s, 1, ArH-2), 7.52 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1, ArH-6), 7.98 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1, NapH-8), 8.06 (s, 1, NapH-5), 8.25 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1, NapH-7), 8.27 (s, 1, NapH-4), 8.60 (s, 1, NapH-1), 9.68 (s, 1, ArOH). High-resolution mass spectrometry for C27H25ClO3 (M+): calculated, 432.1492; found, 432.1492. trans-RA [3] was purchased (Sigma Chemical Co.), as was [11,12-3H)2]9-cis-RA (specific activity, 43 Ci/mmol; DuPont NEN, Boston, MA). 9-cis-RA [4] was prepared as reported (29)
.
Computational Analysis.
CAChe Software (Fujitsu, Beaverton, OR) was used to identify low-energy conformers within 2 kcal of the global energy minimum (MM3 force field, conjugate-gradient minimization, 30° search label variation, exclusion of
9 Å van der Waals interactions, and energy change <0.001 kcal/mol). Conformers were superimposed by using least-squares rigid fit of atoms corresponding to the 1, 59, and 15 carbon molecules of trans-RA.
Receptor Transcriptional Activation.4
CV-1 cells (1,000 per well) were grown in DMEM (Irving Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) with 10% charcoal-treated FCS (Tissue Culture Biologicals, Tulare, CA) for 1624 h before transfection, as described (30
, 31)
. Briefly, 100 ng of (TREpal)2-tk-CAT reporter, ß-galactosidase expression vector pCH 110 (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ), and a RAR expression vector (or 20 ng of RXR
) were mixed with carrier DNA (pBluescript; Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) to give 1 µg of total DNA/well. CAT activity was normalized using ß-galactosidase as the control. Activation after subtraction of constitutive activity is expressed relative to that of 1.0 µM trans-RA for RARs (100%) or 1.0 µM 9-cis-RA for RXR
(100%) and represents the average of three determinations.
Receptor Binding.
Competitive radioligand binding on crude bacterial lysates at 0°C for 2 h used
25 µmol of recombinant human RAR subtype or mouse RXR
-GST fusion proteins in 200 µl of binding buffer [10 mM HEPES (Sigma Chemical Co.; pH 7.8), 100 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, and 10% glycerol] with 12 nM [3H2]9-cis-RA (43 Ci/mmol). Bound [3H]9-cis-RA was isolated (Sephadex G-50; Pharmacia) and counted. Nonspecific [3H]9-cis-RA binding at 1 µM nonlabeled 9-cis-RA generally was <10% of total label bound.
DPSA.
[35S]Met-labeled RAR
, RARß, RAR
, and RXR
, prepared by in vitro transcription/translation (32)
, were used in DPSA as described (33)
. [35S]Met-labeled receptors were incubated with 0.1% ethanol alone, 1.0 µM 9-cis-RA, or MM11453 for 30 min at 0°C. Limited proteolysis (trypsin-tosyl phenylalanyl chloromethyl ketone; Sigma Chemical Co.) for 15 min at 22°C, followed by termination by Laemmli sample buffer and boiling and separation (10% acrylamide gel under denaturing conditions), afforded PFs for visualization by autoradiography (33
, 34)
.
GST-Pulldown.
Experiments were performed as described using GST-p300 1450 (35)
and GST-NCoR 21102453 (36)
fusion proteins and [35S]Met-labeled human RAR
.
Cell Lines and Culture.
RA-resistant HL-60R cells, having a mutant RAR
that does not significantly bind trans-RA and lacking RARß and RAR
(26)
, and MDA-MB-231 cells were grown as described (20)
. MCF-7, LNCaP prostate, H460 and retinoid-resistant H292 lung cancer cells and Jurkat lymphoma cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were grown in RPMI 1640 (Irving Scientific) with 10% charcoal-treated FCS.
Cell Growth Inhibition.
HL-60R and MDA-MB-231 cells (50,000 and 100,000 per well, respectively) and 0.11.0 µM MM11453, AHPN, or Me2SO alone were incubated for 24 or 120 h (72-h medium change), respectively. Results are expressed relative to Me2SO control as mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. SEs were <10%. MCF-7, LNCaP, H292, and H460 cells (3,000 per well in 96-well plates) were treated with 1.0 µM MM11453, AHPN, trans-RA, or ethanol alone for 48 h before viable cell numbers were determined by 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay (7
, 9
, 27)
. Data shown are representative of three experiments.
Apoptosis Detection.
DNA fragmentation and apoptotic bodies were assessed in at least 500 HL-60R or MDA-MB-231 cells after incubation with MM11453 for 24 or 120 h, respectively, as described above, and acridine orange staining (15)
. The percentage of apoptotic cells was expressed relative to the Me2SO control as the mean ± SE of triplicate experiments. MCF-7, LNCaP, H292, H460, and Jurkat cells (3,000 per well) were treated with 1.0 µM MM11453, trans-RA, or ethanol alone for 48 h, trypsinized, washed (PBS), fixed (3.7% paraformaldehyde), and stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (1 µg/ml) to visualize nuclei by fluorescent microscopy (21)
. Cells with apoptotic nuclear morphology were scored in each 400-cell sample using a fluorescence microscope. The data are representative of three experiments.
Northern Analysis.
Total RNAs were prepared (RNeasy Mini kit; Qiagen, Germany), and TR3 expression was determined on 30 µg of total RNA from each line treated with 1.0 µM MM11453, trans-RA, or ethanol alone. Blotting conditions were as described (27)
with ß-actin expression as the control.
TR3 Mitochondrial Targeting.
The expression vector for TR3/
DBD-GFP, a TR3 mutant lacking the DNA-binding domain fused to the green fluorescent protein expression vector, was transiently transfected into H460 cells, as described for LNCaP cells (27)
. Cells were treated with 1.0 µM MM11453 or ethanol alone for 6 h and then immunostained with anti-Hsp60 antibody (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and Cy3-conjugated secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) to indicate mitochondria to which Hsp60 is restricted. Confocal microscopy was used to detect TR3/
DBD-GFP (green fluorescence) and Hsp60 (red). Images were overlaid to show colocalization.
Mitochondrial Membrane Potential Assay.
LNCaP, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231 cells (10,000,000) were treated with 1.0 µM MM11453 for 18 h before incubation with 5 µg/ml Rh123 for 30 min at 37°C. Rh123-fluorescing cells were scored depolarized by flow cytometry (FACScalibur system; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA; Ref. 37
). The data shown are representative of three experiments. Wild-type Jurkat cells or Jurkat cells stably expressing either Bcl-2 or control vector (38)
were treated similarly.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
LBD (40
, 41)
. Three orthogonal views of these overlaps are shown in Fig. 2A
-selective agonists AHPN and MM11254 [6], a (Z)-oxime (14)
of 6-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenylcarbonyl)-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid (42)
, are shown overlapped with RAR
-selective agonist BMS270394 [8], as found in the ligand-binding pocket of crystallized holo-RAR
(40)
. The AHPN 1-adamantyl group overlaps the saturated portion of the 5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethylnaphthalene rings of both RAR
-selective retinoids, and the AHPN phenolic oxygen is near the oxygen molecules in the oxime group of MM11254 (2.5 Å) and the bridge hydroxyl of BSM270394 (3.9 Å). Such hydroxyl groups are reported to confer RAR
selectivity by hydrogen bonding to the Met-272 sulfur molecule of RAR
(41)
. Placement of these overlapped conformers (Fig. 2B)
ligand-binding site gives ligand OMet-272S distances of 4.09, 2.55, and 3.32 Å, respectively. These studies suggest that binding of AHPN to RAR
occurs in the same manner as that of standard retinoid agonists.
|
selective on the (TREpal)2-tk-CAT reporter in cotransfected HeLa cells (12)
, we observed on the (TREpal)2-tk-CAT in CV-1 cells (4)
that high RAR
selectivity occurred at 0.1 µM and below (14)
. At 0.51.0 µM, at which the natural retinoid trans-RA [3] inhibits retinoid-sensitive cancer cells, AHPN significantly activated RARß. At 1.0 µM AHPN, reporter activation by RAR
, RARß, and RAR
was 9, 37, and 54%, respectively, of that caused by 1.0 µM trans-RA (Fig. 3)
to induce even modest (TREpal)2-tk-CAT transcription. MM11453 did not activate RAR
or RXR
and only activated RARß and RAR
to 5 and 10%, respectively, of that of trans-RA or 13 and 19%, respectively, of that of AHPN. Thus, MM11453 is an analogue with substantially reduced capacity for RAR activation.
|
. MM11453 at 1.0 µM displaced 61 ± 6% of [3H2]9-cis-RA bound to RAR
, whereas displacement from other receptors was lower [RAR
(11 ± 2%), RARß (25 ± 5%), and RXR
(18 ± 5%); Fig. 4
|
, RARß, and RAR
produced 27-kDa PF27
, 35-kDa PF35ß, and 32-kDa PF32
, respectively (Lane 3 in Fig. 5, AC
(data not shown). The lack of PFs from RAR-MM11453 complexes suggests that MM11453 does not promote an agonist-bound conformation. Similar to RAR
-selective antagonist MM11253,5
MM11453 did not prevent RAR/RXR agonist 9-cis-RA from inducing this conformation in RAR
, RARß, or RAR
(data not shown).
|
in Vitro.
, as 9-cis-RA does. As indicated (Fig. 6A)
complex.
|
.
. Vehicle (Lane 2 in Fig. 6B
DPSAs (Fig. 5)
-agonist conformation.
MM11453 Inhibited Cancer Cell Growth.
Increasing evidence, including retinoid-resistant cancer cell growth inhibition (13
, 27)
, suggests that AHPN action is independent of retinoid receptors (21
, 44)
. Cell counting and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assays were conducted to show that MM11453 inhibited growth similarly. MM11453 inhibited HL-60R and MDA-MB-231 growth with IC50s of 0.17 and 0.32 µM (Fig. 7, A and B)
, respectively, compared with AHPN values of 0.15 and 0.30 µM, respectively. Inhibition by 1.0 µM trans-RA was
5% (13)
. The effects of MM11453 on H460, H292, LNCaP, and Jurkat cells were then examined. As shown (Fig. 7C)
, 1.0 µM MM11453 significantly reduced growth by 70, 46, 64, and 70%, respectively, whereas 1.0 µM trans-RA reduced H460 growth by 15% and had no evident effect on the other lines (03%). Some of us reported previously that 1.0 µM AHPN for 48 h inhibited the growth of H460, H292, and LNCaP cells by 62 ± 6% (21)
, 53 ± 5% (21)
, and 100 ± 5% (25)
, respectively, whereas Jurkat growth was inhibited by 84% and 80 ± 3% after 24 and 96 h, respectively (22)
. Thus, both AHPN and MM11453 similarly retard the growth of these cell lines.
|
MM11453 Induced TR3 Expression.
TR3 expression must be induced for AHPN to cause lung cancer cell apoptosis (21)
. To determine whether 1.0 µM MM11453 had this capability, H460 and LNCaP cells were treated for 6 h. MM11453 strongly induced TR3 expression, whereas trans-RA did not (Fig. 8)
.
|
DBD-GFP to mitochondria in H460 cells, as indicated in Fig. 9
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
selectivity of AHPN (12)
led to the hypothesis of an apoptotic role for RAR
in breast cancer, melanoma, and neuroblastoma cells (17
, 23
, 24) . To support this, RAR
transcriptionally active AHPN derivatives and analogues were also reported to inhibit growth and induce apoptosis (28
, 48
, 49)
. Other reports present data strongly suggesting an RAR-independent pathway, such as growth inhibition and apoptosis of retinoid-resistant cancer cells (13
, 14
, 21 , 27
, 42
, 44
, 50)
.5
Our results support the latter by showing that MM11453, although unable to activate retinoid receptors on a reporter with the efficacy of standard retinoids or AHPN, strongly inhibited growth and induced apoptosis in retinoid-resistant cancer cell lines.
The near absence of RAR subtype and RXR
transcriptional activation by MM11453 was confirmed by limited proteolysis. DPSAs suggest that MM11453 is not a RAR or RXR
agonist. MM11453 did not induce a protease-resistant RAR
conformation, characteristic of binding a retinoid agonist, such as MM11254 [6], but behaved as the RAR
-selective antagonist MM11253 [7], a dithiane (14
, 39)
of 6-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-naphthalenylcarbonyl)-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid].5
MM11453 did not detectably dissociate NCoR from RAR
or recruit p300 to RAR
, as agonists did. Thus, the behavior of MM11453 contrasts with that of RAR-agonist AHPN (12
, 14)
. A retinoid receptor-independent pathway for anticancer activity has precedent in the mechanism of action of N-(4-hydroxy)phenyl retinamide, which inhibits the growth of cancer cells that resist standard retinoids (51
, 52)
.
DPSA (data not shown) and molecular modeling (Fig. 2)
suggest that AHPN does not induce a unique conformation in the RAR
LBD that could account for apoptosis-inducing activity. RAR
on binding AHPN, trans-RA, or MM11254 produced the same PFs,5
whereas 1.0 µM MM11253 [7] did not induce this conformation5
or transcriptionally activate RAR
(14)
. Both transactivation and DPSA show that the bulky 1-adamantyl group of AHPN (Fig. 2A)
did not prevent an agonist-induced RAR
conformation, and modeling shows the 1-adamantyl group occupying the same region as the tetrahydronaphthalene rings of agonists MM11254 and BMS270394 [8] (Ref. 41
; Fig. 2B
). The three hydroxyl and carboxyl oxygen molecules are also close. Thus, on the basis of the strategy used by Klaholz et al. (41)
that the low-energy conformation of a ligand approximates its bound form, our findings suggest that pharmacophoric AHPN groups are not responsible for inducing any unique conformation in RAR
. Only the 3-chloro group ortho to the COOH group distinguishes MM11453 from AHPN. How the chloro group inhibits transcriptional activation remains to be determined. Both its steric and electronic properties may perturb hydrogen bonding by the COOH group or shift van der Waals contacts of RAR
LBD pendant groups, thereby preventing the conformational changes in the receptor necessary for coactivator recruitment and transcriptional activation.
The inhibition of [3H]9-cis-RA binding to RARs by MM11453 suggests direct binding, whereas transfection indicates minimal RAR or RXR
agonism. Thus, MM11453 may function as a moderately selective RAR
antagonist. Although how RAR
antagonism or that of another RAR or RXR subtype contributes to MM11453 activity remains to be defined, the lack of growth inhibition by antagonist MM11253 (data not shown) suggests that the contribution, if any, is small. Unlike trans-RA, both MM11453 and AHPN strongly inhibited HL-60R, MDA-MB-231, LNCaP, and H292 cell growth and induced apoptosis. EC50s for inhibiting growth in HL-60R and MDA-MB-231 cells were comparable, and their apoptotic EC50s were similar (Fig. 7)
. These results indicate that MM11453 functions independently of RARs and RXR
and strongly suggest a similar mode of action for AHPN. Both AHPN (21)
and MM11453 (Fig. 8)
induced TR3 expression in H460 and LNCaP cells and TR3 mitochondrial translocation (Ref. 27
and Fig. 9
, respectively) and caused inner mitochondrial membrane depolarization in MCF-7, MDA-MB-231, LNCaP, and Jurkat cells (Figs. 10
and 11
). These results demonstrate that MM11453 retains the apoptotic properties of AHPN without behaving as a competent RAR
agonist and, thus, indicate that RAR
activation is not required for apoptotic activity. The recent report that AHPN induces apoptosis in RAR
-negative myeloma cells through a mitochondrial pathway (46)
supports this conclusion. Reporter and limited proteolysis assays on MM11453 and AHPN suggest that their apoptotic activity does not involve RAR
, RARß, or RXR
activation.
Transactivation by liganded RAR
is reported to correlate with retinoid toxicity (53
, 54)
. The lack of retinoid receptor activation activity by MM11453 suggests that toxic side effects characteristic of retinoid receptor activation (reviewed in Ref. 11
) should be reduced in this class of apoptosis inducers, thereby affording more effective candidates for development as cancer chemotherapeutic agents.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by NIH Grant P01 CA51993 (to M. I. D., J. A. F., M. L., and X-k. Z.) and State of California Grant 6RT-2012 (to M. I. D. and X-k. Z.). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at The Burnham Institute, 10901 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037. Phone: (858) 646-3165; Fax: (858) 646-3195; E-mail: mdawson{at}burnham.org ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: RA, retinoic acid; RAR, retinoic acid receptor; RXR, retinoid X receptor; AHPN, 6-[3-(1-adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalenecarboxylic acid; aq, aqueous; GST, glutathione S-transferase; tk, thymidine kinase; CAT, chloramphenicol acetyltransferase; DPSA, differential protease sensitivity assay; TRE, thyroid hormone receptor response element; TREpal, palindromic TRE; PF, protease-resistant fragment; Hsp, heat shock protein; LBD, ligand-binding domain; Met, methionine; NCoR, nuclear receptor corepressor; Rh123, rhodamine green; TTAB, 4-(5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-5,5,8,8-tetramethyl-2-anthracenyl)benzoic acid. ![]()
4 Assay conducted at The Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA, under a license agreement with Ligand Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA. ![]()
5 V. J. Peterson, M. I. Deinzer, M. I. Dawson, K-C. Feng, A. Fields, and M. Leid. Mass spectrometric analysis of agonist-induced retinoic acid receptor
conformational change, unpublished results. ![]()
Received 12/20/00. Accepted 4/17/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
down-regulate the transforming growth factor-ß1 promoter by antagonizing AP-1 activity. Mol. Endocrinol., 7: 1347-1356, 1993.
selectively binding retinoids alone and in combination with interferon-
in breast cancer cell lines. Int. J. Cancer, 71: 497-504, 1997.[Medline]
-selective retinoids exert antiproliferative effects on human melanoma cell growth in vitro. Int. J. Oncol., 5: 1325-1331, 1994.
selectively binding retinoids in neuroblastoma. Anticancer Res., 18: 1777-1786, 1998.[Medline]
. J. Biol. Chem., 272: 33435-33443, 1997.
-interacting protein. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 15901-15907, 1999.
with retinoid inhibition of growth of estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 mammary carcinoma cells. Cancer Res., 55: 4446-4451, 1995.
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 97: 6322-6327, 2000.
in the Rhino mouse and rabbit irritation models of retinoidal activity. Skin Pharmacol., 8: 292-299, 1995.[Medline]
in retinoid-induced skin irritation in hairless mice. Toxicol. Lett., 92: 231-240, 1997.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Jogie-Brahim, D. Feldman, and Y. Oh Unraveling Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-3 Actions in Human Disease Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2009; 30(5): 417 - 437. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. M. Yamada and K.-W. Lee Perspectives in mammalian IGFBP-3 biology: local vs. systemic action Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2009; 296(5): C954 - C976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-W. Lee, L. J. Cobb, V. Paharkova-Vatchkova, B. Liu, J. Milbrandt, and P. Cohen Contribution of the orphan nuclear receptor Nur77 to the apoptotic action of IGFBP-3 Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2007; 28(8): 1653 - 1658. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Parrella, M. Gianni, M. Fratelli, M. M. Barzago, I. Raska Jr, L. Diomede, M. Kurosaki, C. Pisano, P. Carminati, L. Merlini, et al. Antitumor Activity of the Retinoid-Related Molecules (E)-3-(4'-Hydroxy-3'-adamantylbiphenyl-4-yl)acrylic Acid (ST1926) and 6-[3-(1-Adamantyl)-4-hydroxyphenyl]-2-naphthalene Carboxylic Acid (CD437) in F9 Teratocarcinoma: Role of Retinoic Acid Receptor {gamma} and Retinoid-Independent Pathways Mol. Pharmacol., September 1, 2006; 70(3): 909 - 924. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. C. Reed and M. Pellecchia Apoptosis-based therapies for hematologic malignancies Blood, July 15, 2005; 106(2): 408 - 418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.-W. Lee, L. Ma, X. Yan, B. Liu, X.-k. Zhang, and P. Cohen Rapid Apoptosis Induction by IGFBP-3 Involves an Insulin-like Growth Factor-independent Nucleomitochondrial Translocation of RXR{alpha}/Nur77 J. Biol. Chem., April 29, 2005; 280(17): 16942 - 16948. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Cao, W. Liu, F. Lin, H. Li, S. K. Kolluri, B. Lin, Y.-h. Han, M. I. Dawson, and X.-k. Zhang Retinoid X Receptor Regulates Nur77/Thyroid Hormone Receptor 3-Dependent Apoptosis by Modulating Its Nuclear Export and Mitochondrial Targeting Mol. Cell. Biol., November 15, 2004; 24(22): 9705 - 9725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. K. Kolluri, N. Bruey-Sedano, X. Cao, B. Lin, F. Lin, Y.-H. Han, M. I. Dawson, and X.-k. Zhang Mitogenic Effect of Orphan Receptor TR3 and Its Regulation by MEKK1 in Lung Cancer Cells Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2003; 23(23): 8651 - 8667. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Korichneva, J. Waka, and U. Hammerling Regulation of the Cardiac Mitochondrial Membrane Potential by Retinoids J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., May 1, 2003; 305(2): 426 - 433. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. F. Holmes, D. R. Soprano, and K. J. Soprano Elucidation of Molecular Events Mediating Induction of Apoptosis by Synthetic Retinoids Using a CD437-resistant Ovarian Carcinoma Cell Line J. Biol. Chem., November 15, 2002; 277(47): 45408 - 45419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. A. Smith and B. Anderson Where to Next with Retinoids for Cancer Therapy? Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2001; 7(10): 2955 - 2957. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |