Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moynahan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jasin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moynahan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jasin, M.
[Cancer Research 61, 4842-4850, June 15, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Molecular Biology and Genetics

Homology-directed DNA Repair, Mitomycin-C Resistance, and Chromosome Stability Is Restored with Correction of a Brca1 Mutation1

Mary Ellen Moynahan2, Tracy Y. Cui3 and Maria Jasin

Department of Medicine [M. E. M.] and Cell Biology Program [T. Y. C., M. J.], Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chromosomal breaks occur spontaneously as a result of normal DNA metabolism and after exposure to DNA-damaging agents. A major pathway involved in chromosomal double-strand break repair is homologous recombination. In this pathway, a DNA sequence with similarity to a damaged chromosome directs the repair of the damage. The protein products of the hereditary breast cancer susceptibility genes, BRCA1 and BRCA2, interact with the Rad51 protein, a central component of homologous repair pathways. We have recently shown that this interaction is significant by demonstrating that Brca1- and BRCA2-deficient cells are defective in homology-directed chromosomal break repair. We confirm that Brca1-deficient embryonic stem (ES) cells are defective in gene targeting and homology-directed repair of an I-Sce I-induced chromosome break. The phenotypic paradigm that defines homology-directed repair mutants is extended to these Brca1-deficient cells by the demonstration of 100-fold sensitivity to the interstrand cross-linking agent mitomycin-C and spontaneous chromosome instability. Interestingly, although chromosome aberrations were evident, aneuploidy was not observed. Repair phenotypes are partially restored by expression of a Brca1 transgene, whereas correction of one mutated Brca1 allele through gene targeting fully restores mitomycin-C resistance and chromosome stability. We conclude that the inability to properly repair strand breaks by homology-directed repair gives rise to defects in chromosome maintenance that promote genetic instability and, it is likely, tumorigenesis.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Individuals who carry mutations in the hereditary breast cancer gene, BRCA1, are predisposed to early-onset breast and ovary cancer. Although the relationship to cancer predisposition remains speculative, the BRCA1 protein has been implicated in multiple cellular functions associated with the DNA damage response. These functions include DNA repair (1, 2, 3) , the cellular response to DNA damage via upstream damage-signaling proteins, and transcriptional regulation of proteins involved in the downstream response to DNA damage. After treatment of cells with DNA damaging agents, BRCA1 is phosphorylated by the signaling proteins ATM, ATR, and Chk2 (4, 5, 6) and appears to regulate the expression of genes farther downstream, such as p21, p53, and GADD45 (7, 8, 9) . Biochemical analysis of nuclear extracts demonstrates that the BRCA1 protein is part of a large complex of proteins involved in damage recognition and repair, which has led to the hypothesis that BRCA1 acts as a scaffold to coordinate the cellular response (10) .

One type of damage to which mouse and human BRCA1-deficient cells respond abnormally is the DNA DSB.4 Chromosome DSBs arise from both endogenous processes and exogenous agents such as IR, causing cell death or genomic alterations if not repaired appropriately. BRCA1 mutant human cells (i.e., HCC1937 cancer cells) are hypersensitive to IR, and this sensitivity is partially relieved (2–3x) by expression of wild-type BRCA1. Of note, significant IR sensitivity remains in the BRCA1-complemented HCC1937 cells (3) . Brca1 mutant mouse cell lines, such as the 236.44 ES cell line, are also sensitive to IR, as are Brca1 mutant embryos (1 , 11) . In mammalian cells two major repair pathways, homologous recombination and NHEJ, prevent deleterious outcomes after treatment of cells with agents that cause DSBs. The association of Rad51, the eukaryotic homologue of the Escherichia coli RecA protein, with BRCA1 in immunoprecipitable complexes, as well as the observed subnuclear localization of BRCA1 with Rad51 in IR-induced foci (12 , 13) , is highly suggestive of a role for BRCA1 in homology-directed repair (HDR). However, after IR treatment of cells, BRCA1 also colocalizes with the Rad50 complex, which, in yeast, has a role in NHEJ as well as in HDR, raising the possibility of a role for BRCA1 in this DSB repair pathway (14) .

We have recently examined DSB repair at the molecular level in the Brca1-/- 236.44 ES cell line to determine the nature of the repair defect. This cell line was constructed through consecutive rounds of gene targeting such that both Brca1 alleles are mutated by deletion of the 5' end of exon 11 (15) . The targeted alleles are hypomorphs, inasmuch as they express a truncated product arising from an alternatively spliced transcript that skips exon 11 (16) . In addition to being hypersensitive to IR, the 236.44 cell line is hypersensitive to cisplatin, has reduced Rad51 focus formation after cisplatin treatment, and is defective in transcription-coupled repair of oxidative damage (1 , 17) . By examining repair of an endonuclease-generated DSB in this cell line, we demonstrated that HDR is reduced, though NHEJ is not impaired but, rather, slightly elevated (2) . Because DSB repair mutants often exhibit spontaneous chromosome instability, there was a concern that additional genomic changes had occurred in the Brca1-/- 236.44 cells, such that the observed repair defects are not fully attributable to loss of wild-type Brca1. Partial complementation of these cells by the reintroduction of wild-type Brca1 has, in fact, not demonstrated a clear restoration of homologous recombination (16) .

In the current study, we have examined repair phenotypes of the Brca1 mutant 236.44 cell line as well as derivative cell lines in which wild-type Brca1 is reexpressed as a result of either complementation from a Brca1 transgene or correction of one of the Brca1 hypomorphic alleles. Using a recombination reporter assay recently developed for the analysis of Brca2 mutant cells, we show that the 236.44 cell line has impaired HDR of an induced chromosome break and reduced gene targeting, and we confirm that wild-type Brca1 expression in this cell line restores levels of both types of homologous recombination. We also demonstrate that Brca1 deficiency results in chromosome instability in ES cells, although not the dramatic instability detected in MEFs. Moreover, Brca1-deficient cells exhibit exquisite sensitivity to the interstrand cross-linking agent mitomycin-C, suggesting that this or related DNA-damaging agents may have a highly favorable therapeutic ratio. Notably, restoration of Brca1 by transgene complementation was less effective at reversing repair defects than correction of a defective Brca1 allele by gene targeting, presumably because of the difficulty in expressing a physiologically relevant amount of Brca1.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
DNA Manipulations.
The p59xDR-GFP6 pim1-targeting vector was previously described (18) . The targeting fragments were obtained by XhoI digestion. The pBBxAx transgene and the puromycin-resistant Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell line containing the Brca1 cDNA was a gift of Beverly Koller, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC (16) . The plasmid was linearized before transfection. The pBrca1+S1Rhyg (S1Rhyg) gene-targeting plasmid was constructed by manipulation of a plasmid containing 12.3 kb of murine Brca1 genomic sequence (gift of Beverly Koller). The plasmid was digested with NheI-SpeI, resulting in a 5.7-kb fragment containing pBS (Promega) and 3' Brca1 sequences and a 6.0-kb NheI-SpeI 5' Brca1 fragment. These fragments were religated to create pBrca1NheI-SpeI, thereby deleting an internal 2.4-kb NheI Brca1 fragment. pBS was digested with EcoR V-HincII and religated to delete the EcoR V site. pBrca1NheI-SpeI was digested with EcoRI to obtain a 7.6-kb Brca1 fragment, NotI linkers were added after Klenow treatment and ligated to NotI digested pBSdelRV to create pBrca1Not. A blunted-ended hyg-S1neo fragment (19) was inserted into a unique EcoR V site in intron 9 of pBrca1Not, creating pBrca1-RVS1Rhyg. Orientation of the hyg cassette was running in the opposite orientation of Brca1. S1Rhyg was completed by digestion of pBrca1-RVS1Rhyg with NheI and ligation with a 2.4-kb NheI Brca1 fragment that had been deleted in an earlier cloning step. Multiple-restriction digests verified the correct orientation of the insert. S1Rhyg was linearized by digestion with NotI before gene targeting.

Cell Transfections and Nucleic Acid Analysis.
For stable transfection of pBBxAx, Brca1-/- ES cells were cotransfected by electroporation at 800 V/3 µF with 75 µg of the linear fragment from pBBxAx and 25 µg of a phosphoglycerate kinase-puromycin expression plasmid with subsequent selection after 24 h in 1.0 µg/ml puromycin. purR clones were picked and expanded 12–16 days later. Southern blots of genomic DNA from these clones were hybridized with a Brca1 probe. For gene targeting, ES cells were electroporated with 75 µg of linear targeting fragment from p59xDR-GFP6 with subsequent selection after 48 h in hygromycin 110 µg/ml and puromycin 1.0 µg/ml. hygR and purR clones were picked and expanded 10–12 days later. Southern blots of genomic DNA from these clones were digested with HincII and hybridized with a radiolabeled pim1 probe. For Brca1 correction by gene targeting, Brca1-/- ES cells were electroporated with 75 µg of linear pBrca1+S1Rhyg targeting fragment with subsequent selection after 24 h in hygromycin 200 µg/ml. HygR clones were picked and expanded 10–12 days later. Southern blots of genomic DNA from these clones were digested with EcoRV and hybridized with a 3' 1.2-kb Brca1 probe. For DSB repair assays, actively growing cells were electroporated at 250 V/960 µF with 30–50 µg of pCßASce (20) , mock DNA, or pNZE-CAG (21) and plated in nonselective media. Cells were trypsinized at 45–48 h and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data were analyzed with Lysis software. For Brca1 expression, total mRNA was extracted from actively growing cells by RNAzol (Biotecx Laboratories) treatment. Northern analysis was performed by standard techniques.

Mitomycin-C Clonogenic Survival Assays.
For mitomycin-C survival assays, cells were exposed to various mitomycin-C doses for 4 h and then rinsed three times in PBS. The cells were replated and allowed to grow undisturbed for 8–10 days. The colonies were stained and counted. Survival experiments were performed in triplicate.

Metaphase Spreads and Karotype Analysis.
For karotype analysis, cells were cultured with 0.05 µg/ml colcemid (Life Technologies, Inc.) for 1.5 h, then trypsinized and resuspended in hypotonic saline (0.075 M KCl) at 37°C for 10 min. The cells were fixed in a 3:1 mix of methanol and acetic acid. Fixed cell suspensions were transferred to glass slides and allowed to air-dry. Metaphase spreads were stained with 4% Giemsa in PBS for 20 min.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Partial Complementation of the Gene-targeting Defect in Brca1-/- ES Cells by Brca1 Transgene Expression.
Gene targeting is a measure of the ability of cells to homologously integrate transfected DNA into genetic loci containing sufficient sequence homology to the transfected DNA. Deficiencies in gene targeting, attributable to cellular defects in homologous recombination, have been reported for Brca1, Brca2, and Rad54 mutant cell lines, although the precise relationship between homologous integration and HDR is not well understood (2 , 18 , 22) . To investigate both homologous recombination pathways, i.e., gene targeting and HDR of a targeted chromosomal break, the DR-GFP reporter substrate was subcloned into the pim1 gene-targeting vector, p59x, creating p59xDR-GFP6 (Fig. 1ACitation ; Ref. 18 ). Gene targeting with the p59x vector is highly efficient, because the selectable hygromycin resistance gene (hygR) is fused in-frame to pim1 coding sequences such that expression of hygR is dependent on either targeting to the pim1 locus on chromosome 17 or a fortuitous nonhomologous integration adjacent to promoter sequences of another locus (23) . The p59xDR-GFP6 vector additionally contains an intact puromycin resistance gene (purR), which can also be used to select for vector integration events.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Gene-targeting defect in Brca1-/- ES cells can be partially corrected by Brca1 transgene expression. A, the pim1 genomic locus undergoes highly efficient gene targeting with the p59xDR-GFP6 vector because of the promoterless integration of hygromycin within pim1 coding sequences. Clones that are hygR are typically targeted because hygromycin expression from the pim1 promoter occurs upon homologous integration. Random integration of the p59xDR-GFP6 vector can result in hygR if integration fortuitously occurs adjacent to promoter sequences. Within p59xDR-GFP6 are the SceGFP and iGFP genes in the same orientation as the pim1 and hyg coding sequences. H, HincII sites. B, Southern blot analysis of hygR clones derived from Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, Brca1-/-, and Brca1-/-, Tg+ ES cells transfected with the p59xDR-GFP6 targeting vector. DNA from individually expanded clones was digested with HincII and hybridized with the pim1 probe (A). The wild-type pim1 allele generates a 3.6-kb HincII fragment, and the targeted pim1 allele generates a 2.4 kb fragment.

 
In our initial report examining homologous recombination in the Brca1-/- 236.44 cell line, we determined that gene targeting was reduced 13- and 23-fold relative to the control Brca1+/- cell line, as measured at two distinct genomic loci, Rb and pim1, respectively (2) . To confirm that the defect in gene targeting was attributable to the loss of wild-type Brca1, we electroporated the linearized p59xDR-GFP6 targeting fragment into a Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell line that is derived from the Brca1-/- line, but which expresses full-length mouse Brca1 from a randomly integrated cDNA at ~10–20% normal Brca1 levels (Ref. 16 and data not shown). Doubly resistant hygR/purR colonies were selected, and genomic DNA from individual colonies was analyzed by Southern blotting using a pim1 probe located outside the targeting fragment (Fig. 1A)Citation . Efficient gene targeting was observed in the Brca1+/- cells, with 94% of hygR/purR clones correctly targeted (Fig. 1BCitation ; Table 1Citation ). However, homologous integrations were rarely detected in the Brca1-/- cells, with only 6% of the hygR/purR clones correctly targeted, which is a 16-fold lower frequency of gene targeting as compared with Brca1+/- cells. This diminished ability to gene target is comparable with the 23-fold lower frequency we originally reported at the pim1 locus in the Brca1-/- cells. The small improvement in gene targeting may be related to the more stringent combined hygromycin and puromycin selection used in the targeting of the p59xDR-GFP6 fragment, because we observed that background colonies observed during hygromycin selection of Brca-/- cells were significantly reduced with the combined selection. The addition of puromycin to the hygromycin selective media for Brca1+/+ and Brca1+/- cells did not alter or improve upon the gene targeting frequencies obtained with hygromycin alone (data not shown). The addition of puromycin to the Brca1-/-,Tg+ would not effect gene targeting, because these cells were selected for purR during the integration of the Brca1 transgene (16) .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Gene-targeting efficiency at the pim1 locus

 
In the Brca1-/-,Tg+ cells, gene targeting was partially restored, whereby homologous integrants were obtained at a frequency of nearly 62% (Fig. 1BCitation and Table 1Citation ). This is a 10-fold improvement in gene targeting as compared with the Brca1-/- mutant cells. However, when compared with the Brca1+/- cells, a 1.6-fold decreased targeting efficiency remained in the transgene corrected cell line, suggesting only partial complementation of the gene targeting defect by expression from the Brca1 transgene.

In this experiment we also examined gene targeting in parental Brca1+/+ cells, because loss of a single BRCA1 allele in human cell lines has been implicated in sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents (24) . Similar to the Brca1+/- cells, 97% of hygR/purR clones were correctly targeted. Thus, mouse cells heterozygous for a Brca1 mutation have no detectable defect in gene targeting as compared with Brca1+/+ ES cells. In addition, these results imply that the Brca1 exon 10–12 splice variant that is expressed in the Brca1+/- cells has no detectable dominant-negative effect on gene targeting.

HDR of a Chromosomal DSB in Brca1-/- ES Cells Is Also Partially Restored by Brca1 Transgene Expression.
The DR-GFP reporter substrate (21) , which was incorporated at the pim1 locus of cell lines during targeting of the p59xDR-GFP6 vector, measures HDR of an endonuclease-induced DSB by a gene conversion mechanism. It is composed of two differentially mutated GFP genes oriented as direct repeats and separated by the purR gene (Fig. 2A)Citation . The SceGFP gene is a GFP gene that is mutated by 11 bp substitutions to contain the 18 bp recognition sequence for the I-Sce I endonuclease. Downstream of SceGFP is the 0.8-kb GFP fragment iGFP, which is a wild-type GFP gene truncated at both its 5' and 3' ends. Expression of I-Sce I in cells that have the DR-GFP substrate integrated into their genome results in a DSB in the chromosome at the position of the I-Sce I site. Repair of the induced DSB in SceGFP by a non-crossover gene conversion with iGFP reconstructs a GFP+gene, expression of which can be scored by cellular fluorescence. Although other DSB repair events at the I-Sce I site are possible, they are not detected, because the 11-bp substitutions in the SceGFP gene cannot be restored to the wild-type GFP sequence except through a templated gene conversion event. Molecular analysis of the DR-GFP substrate in sorted GFP-positive cells after I-Sce I expression has verified that cellular green fluorescence, as measured by flow cytometry, results from repair by gene conversion (18 , 21) .



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Brca1 transgene expression can partially restore HDR of a chromosomal DSB in Brca1-/- ES cells. A, the recombination repair substrate DR-GFP is composed of two differentially mutated GFP genes, SceGFP and iGFP. When the I-Sce I endonuclease is expressed in cells which have targeted the DR-GFP substrate to the pim1 locus, a DSB will be introduced at the I-Sce I site in the SceGFP gene. Repair of the DSB by a non-crossover gene conversion with the downstream iGFP gene results in reconstitution of a functional GFP gene. Because the I-Sce I site mutation in the SceGFP gene entails 11 bp changes including the introduction of two stop codons, homologous recombination between SceGFP and iGFP is required to restore a functional GFP gene (21) . B, gene conversion within the DR-GFP substrate as deduced from the percentage of GFP-positive cells. Targeted Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, Brca1-/-, and Brca1-/-, Tg+ ES cell lines were transiently transfected with the I-Sce I expression vector, pCßASce, negative control DNA, and positive control DNA. The rare occurrence of GFP-positive cells after transfection with negative control DNA (0.00–0.01%) is not shown. , the percentage of GFP-positive cells subsequent to transfection of the I-Sce I expression vector normalized to the wild-type Brca1+/+ cells. I-Sce I expression strongly induces the number of GFP-positive Brca1+/+ and Brca1+/- cells, indicating robust DSB repair by gene conversion; however, Brca1-/- cells have 6-fold fewer GFP-positive cells, indicating impaired HDR of a DSB by gene conversion (P < 0.0001). Brca1 transgene expression in the Brca1-/-, Tg+ cells exhibited a 2-fold improvement in HDR of an induced DSB as compared with the Brca1-/- cells (P = 0.032). This graphical depiction includes quadruplicate experiments wherein three independent clones from each different genotype were analyzed. The number of GFP-positive cells for the three independent clones from each genotype was averaged for each experiment. The percentage of GFP-positive wild-type cells was normalized to one, and the relative frequencies of the other Brca1 genotypes were calculated; +/+, Brca1+/+ cells; +/-, Brca1+/-cells; -/-, Brca1-/- cells; and -/-, Tg+, Brca1-/-, Tg+ cells targeted with the p59xDR-GFP6 vector. Bars, SE.

 
To analyze HDR in cell lines with various Brca1 genotypes, several of the p59xDR-GFP6 targeted clones for each genotype were electroporated with the I-Sce I expression vector pCßASce to transiently express the I-Sce I endonuclease. Electroporated cells were typically examined 48 h later by flow cytometry. GFP-positive cells were undetected or rarely detected (<0.01%) in any of the cell lines in the absence of I-Sce I expression (data not shown), indicating that spontaneous intrachromosomal gene conversion is rare. After transfection with pCßASce, however, GFP-positive cells were readily detected in the Brca1+/+ and Brca1+/- cells, indicating robust HDR of the induced DSB. The absolute frequency of GFP positive cells varied between experiments, with a range of 1–4% positive cells, although there was no detectable difference between the Brca1+/+ and Brca1+/- cells when normalized to each other within a particular experiment (Fig. 2B)Citation . As with gene targeting, therefore, HDR of an induced chromosomal break is not diminished in ES cells containing only one wild-type Brca1 allele. Proficient HDR in the Brca1+/- cells also indicates that the exon 10–12 splice variant arising from the mutated Brca1 allele does not exhibit a dominant-negative effect on the wild-type Brca1 allele.

The Brca1-/- cells exhibited many fewer GFP-positive cells after I-Sce I expression, such that there was a 6-fold decrease in HDR relative to the Brca1+/+ and Brca1+/- cell lines (Fig. 2B)Citation . This decrease in gene conversion measured by GFP expression is comparable with the previously reported 5–6-fold decrease in gene conversion measured by a PCR-based assay with a neo substrate (2) . The transgene-complemented Brca1-/-,Tg+ cells, however, showed a 2-fold increase in HDR over the Brca1-/- cells. Thus, HDR was increased by wild-type Brca1 expression, although, as with gene targeting, it was not completely restored.

Electroporations were also performed with a GFP expression vector to verify that the different cell lines had a similar transfection efficiency. The GFP expression vector that was electroporated, pCAG-NZE, uses the same control elements to express GFP as the pCßASce vector uses to express I-Sce I. Electroporated cells were examined by flow cytometry. No difference in GFP expression, which ranged from 44–58%, was detected between any of the Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, Brca1-/-, and Brca1-/-,Tg+ targeted cell clones (data not shown), indicating that the transfection efficiency was not appreciably different for these lines.

Brca1-deficient Cells Are Hypersensitive to the DNA Interstrand Cross-linking Agent Mitomycin-C.
The first recognized mammalian HDR mutants, the irs1 and irs1SF hamster cell lines deficient for the Rad51-related proteins XRCC2 and XRCC3, respectively, show moderate sensitivity to IR, as do Brca1- deficient cells, but an extreme sensitivity to mitomycin-C (25) . Mitomycin-C produces several types of DNA damage, one of which is an interstrand DNA cross-link. This lesion could potentiate DSBs through replication fork blockage, producing an intermediate that is much more dependent for repair on HDR than on NHEJ, although the exact mode of repair is unknown (26) . To investigate whether Brca1 deficiency also results in mitomycin-C sensitivity, clonogenic survival assays were performed in the Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, Brca1-/-, and Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell lines after exposure to increasing doses of mitomycin-C.

Hypersensitivity was seen at all mitomycin-C doses in the Brca1-/- cells as compared with the wild-type and heterozygous Brca1 cell lines (Fig. 3)Citation . The extent of sensitivity to mitomycin-C was dose dependent. At a mitomycin-C concentration of 0.5 µM, which was approximately the LD50 for wild-type cells, the Brca1-/- cells exhibited a >100-fold increased sensitivity (Fig. 3)Citation . No difference in sensitivity to mitomycin-C in the Brca1+/- and Brca1+/+ cell lines was observed at this or other doses. Consistent with the homologous recombination assays, the Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell lines revealed an intermediate sensitivity to mitomycin-C.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Brca1-/- cells are hypersensitive to mitomycin-C. Clonogenic survival was assessed after treatment with varying concentrations of mitomycin-C. Four plates from each Brca1 genotype, as indicated, were assessed for colony formation 8–10 days after exposure to mitomycin-C. The experiments were repeated. Bars, SE.

 
In an attempt to restore wild-type levels of mitomycin-C resistance to the Brca1-/- cells, we constructed additional transgene- complemented clones. Brca1-/- cells were electroporated with the selectable purR gene and the pBBrpAX expression vector, which expresses mouse Brca1 from 4 kb of Brca1 upstream sequences and has a bovine growth hormone polyadenylation signal. This is the same vector previously used to construct the Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell line (16) . PurR clones were analyzed by Northern blotting for Brca1 expression, and, although some clones did not express Brca1, others had levels comparable with the Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell line (data not shown). Two of these Brca1-expressing clones were tested in a mitomycin-C clonogenic survival assay along with a purR clone that did not express Brca1. Whereas the nonexpressing clone demonstrated the same hypersensitivity to mitomycin-C as did the parental Brca1-/- cell line, the Brca1-expressing clones demonstrated a similar intermediate level of mitomycin-C sensitivity that was seen for the Brca1-/-,Tg+ cell line (data not shown). Thus, we were unable to fully restore wild-type levels of mitomycin-C resistance by transgene complementation.

Correction of the Brca1Exon 11 Deletion through Gene Targeting.
The incomplete restoration of homologous recombination and mitomycin-C resistance in the Brca1 transgene-complemented cell lines could be attributable to inadequate expression of Brca1 or undetected alterations in the Brca1 transgene upon integration. It is also formally possible that genomic changes occurred in the Brca1-/- cell line that contributed to the observed repair defects. This was a particular concern, given the dramatic chromosomal instability observed in MEFs harboring a similar Brca1 mutation.

To better address the dependence of the repair defects on Brca1-deficiency, a gene-targeting fragment was constructed to correct the exon 11 deletion mutation in the Brca1-/- 236.44 cell line (Fig. 4A)Citation . The Brca1 alleles in this line are disrupted by replacement of the 3' end of intron 10 and 1.5 kb from the 5' end of exon 11 with neo and hprt selectable marker genes. To correct one of these alleles, a targeting fragment was constructed in which the hygR gene was inserted into intron 9 of wild-type murine Brca1 genomic sequences. Gene targeting of this fragment, termed S1Rhyg, at either Brca1 allele would therefore restore an intact exon 11, giving rise to a Brca1+gt allele. In wild-type ES cells, we found that the S1Rhyg fragment yielded a high targeting efficiency, such that 75–90% of the hygR clones had homologously integrated this fragment at the Brca1 locus (data not shown). Thus, although gene targeting is substantially reduced in the Brca1-/- cell line, the high targeting efficiency of this fragment suggested that we would be able obtain homologous integrations with sufficient screening of hygR clones.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Correction of the Brca1-/- cells through gene targeting. A, a portion of genomic Brca1 at exons 10–12. The genomic structure of the gene-targeted alleles in the Brca1-/- cells shows the disruption of exon 11 by hprt on one allele and neo on the other allele. The targeting fragment, S1Rhyg, has an intact exon 11 with a hyg gene inserted at an EcoR V site within intron 9 of Brca1 genomic sequences. Gene targeting of the S1Rhyg fragment to the Brca1 locus in the Brca1-/- cells can restore wild-type Brca1 to one allele to create a Brca1+gt allele. B, Southern blot analysis of hygR clones after transfection with the S1Rhyg fragment. Genomic DNA from 159 hygR clones was digested with EcoR V and hybridized to a radio-labeled 3' Brca1 probe as indicated in A. Two Brca1-/+gt clones, E4 and H7, were identified which contained the 11.3-kb S1Rhyg Brca1 fragment, indicative of correction of the Brca1- neo allele with the Brca1+gt allele. The large fragment-size of the Brca1-hprt and Brca1+gt alleles make the separation by size difficult and, therefore, is commonly observed as a doublet by Southern analysis.

 
As the Brca1-/- cell lines with the integrated DR-GFP substrate were already hygR, the parental Brca1-/- 236.44 cell line was electroporated with the S1Rhyg targeting fragment. HygR clones were analyzed by Southern blotting using a Brca1 probe located 3' to the targeting fragment (Fig. 4A)Citation . Two of 159 hygR clones yielded EcoRV fragments indicative of correction of the neo allele (Fig. 4B)Citation . Whereas most of the clones gave two distinct fragments for the hprt and neo alleles (12.3 and 5.9 kb, respectively), as in the parental Brca1-/- cell line, in the two targeted clones, E4 and H7, the neo fragment was replaced with a fragment expected for a targeted Brca1+gt hyg allele (11.3 kb). Because of the similarity in size of the hprt and hyg alleles, the blots were reprobed with an hprt fragment to determine whether the hprt allele was gene-targeted. In each of the clones, the hprt allele was still present, indicating that none of the other 157 clones was targeted (data not shown).

Because insertions into the intron of a gene can sometimes disrupt its expression, we determined whether Brca1 mRNA was restored in the targeted clones by performing Northern blot analysis. Brca1+/- cells were found to express the wild-type 7.2-kb Brca1 mRNA (Fig. 5)Citation , which was not present in the Brca1-/- cells (data not shown). Rather, a 3.9-kb transcript was seen in the mutant cells that resulted from the exon 10–12 splice. In the E4 and H7 Brca1-/+gt clones, the 7.2-kb mRNA was observed, indicating restoration of Brca1 expression (Fig. 5)Citation . Quantitation of Brca1 expression in these clones indicated that mRNA levels were similar to the Brca1+/- cells. A third hygR clone, H10, that was derived from the S1Rhyg targeting experiment but which had randomly integrated the fragment, was also examined for Brca1 expression. As expected, only the 3.9-kb exon 10–12 variant mRNA was observed in the H10 clone, similar to the parental Brca1-/- cells (Fig. 5)Citation .



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Expression of Brca1 is restored in Brca1-/+gt cells. Northern blot analysis was performed with 10 µg of total RNA obtained from Brca1+/-, Brca1-/+gt, and Brca1-/- cells. Endogenous Brca1 expression results in a 7.2kb mRNA, which is observed in the Brca1 heterozygote C6 clone and the two Brca1-/+gt corrected E4 and H7 clones. The Brca1-/- H10 clone is a hygR clone that was obtained from the S1Rhyg gene-targeting experiment in which the fragment had integrated randomly into the genome and therefore did not correct the Brca1 mutation. This cell line does not express the 7.2-kb Brca1 mRNA, but it does express the 3.9-kb Brca1 exon 10–12 splice variant. Quantitation of mRNA by Phospho-image analysis indicated that the gene-corrected and heterozygote cells expressed wild-type Brca1 at similar levels. The slightly slower mobility for the H7 Brca1 mRNA was not seen consistently. A Brca1 probe containing the sequence from exons 9–11 was used for detection. The blot was rehybridized with a ß-actin probe to confirm equal RNA loading.

 
To determine whether restoration of Brca1 expression in the Brca1-/+gt cells led to normal levels of mitomycin-C resistance, the E4 and H7 clones were analyzed in clonogenic survival assays together with the control cells. Unlike the transgene complemented lines, restoration was nearly complete in both of the Brca1-/+gt clones, as compared with both wild-type and heterozygote Brca1 cells (Fig. 6)Citation . This functional restoration suggests that the repair defects observed in the Brca1-/- 236.44 cell line are attributable specifically to the Brca1 mutation rather than to other genetic alterations.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Mitomycin-C resistance is restored with correction of the Brca1 mutation. In addition to the Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, Brca1-/-, and Brca1-/-, Tg+ cell lines, the two corrected Brca1-/+gt cell were treated with mitomycin-C at various doses. Clonogenic survival assays were performed as described in the legend to Fig. 3Citation . Mitomycin-C resistance is restored to near wild-type levels in the gene-corrected E4 and H7 Brca1-/+gt cell lines. Depicted are the various Brca1 genotypes.

 
Spontaneous Chromosome Instability in Brca1-/- ES Cells.
Chromosome instability in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agents seems to be a hallmark of cells with HDR defects. Consistent with this, MEFs and tumors derived from mice that harbor a Brca1 exon 11 deletion created by lox-cre recombination have marked chromosome instability, including extensive aneuploidy, chromosome breaks, and translocations (11 , 27 , 28) . Because ES cells in some instances manifest different DNA damage responses than fibroblasts, we examined metaphase spreads of ES cell lines carrying different Brca1 genotypes to determine whether these cells have chromosomal abnormalities. Unlike Brca1-deficient MEFs, Brca1-/- ES cells did not exhibit pronounced aneuploidy (data not shown). The average chromosome number in the Brca1-/- cells was 40, which was not significantly different from the wild-type and Brca1+/- cell lines. However, chromosome instability was evident in the Brca1-deficient cells, as characterized by an increase in the number of chromosome aberrations (Table 2)Citation . The control cell lines expressing wild-type Brca1, i.e., Brca1+/+, Brca1+/-, and corrected Brca1-/+gt cell lines, each had a similar low frequency of observed chromosome aberrations, ~3–4% of metaphases. By contrast, the Brca1 mutant cells had a substantially increased number, with ~20% of metaphases containing aberrations. Spontaneous chromosomal instability is significantly higher (P = 0.0079) in Brca1-/- cells as compared with Brca1+/+, Brca1+/- and Brca1-/+gt cells. The increase was attributable to a number of different chromosomal abnormalities, including chromatid breaks and exchanges and chromosome breaks, deletions, and translocations. As seen with other assays, the Brca1-/-Tg+ cell lines fell between mutant and wild-type cells. They had ~2-fold fewer aberrations than Brca1-/- cells (P = 0.043), but 2–3-fold more aberrations than wild-type cells, in accordance with partial correction of the Brca1 defect in these cells. This contrasted with the gene-targeted E4 and H7 clones that were fully corrected.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Spontaneous gross chromosomal aberrations in mouse ES cells lines with different Brca1 genotypes

 
It is plausible that chromosome aneuploidy and multiple aberrations within a cell are better tolerated in a differentiated cell type and extended further when cell checkpoints are eliminated. However, when cells responsible for self-renewal incur chromosome insults, such as the ES cell, it is possible that cell death pathways predominate to limit the propagation of this instability. Although increased cell death was not formally evaluated in this study, a striking small-colony morphology was typically exhibited in the Brca1-/- cell lines as compared with the cell lines that contained a wild-type Brca1 allele (data not shown). This small-colony morphology was eliminated by correction in the Brca1-/+gt cell lines (data not shown). Cell cycle distribution was evaluated previously (2 , 17) and was found to be similar between the Brca1-/- and Brca1+/- cell lines and therefore was not likely to be a factor in the etiology of small colonies.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
These results provide direct evidence that cells containing a Brca1 mutation have impaired homologous recombination, as measured by gene targeting and, importantly, HDR of a chromosome break. Moreover, Brca1 deficiency results in mitomycin-C sensitivity, which is more profound than the previously published IR and cisplatin sensitivities (1 , 17) . A substantial increase in gross chromosomal aberrations was also observed, although aneuploidy was not evident. These latter defects of cross-linking agent sensitivity and genomic instability are fully attributable to Brca1 deficiency, and it is probable that the HDR defect in this cell line is also completely attributable to Brca1 deficiency.

Mammalian cell lines identified to have substantially impaired HDR defects, i.e., the XRCC2 and XRCC3 mutants, were originally characterized on the basis of their weak IR sensitivity but substantial mitomycin-C sensitivity and a high frequency of both spontaneous and induced chromosomal aberrations (25 , 29) . The repair phenotypes arising from Brca1 mutation described in this report are similar to those found in classical HDR mutants, and recent results suggest that similar phenotypes arise from Brca2 mutation (30) . These phenotypes may define the paradigm for HDR mutants and provide a contrast to NHEJ mutants, for which severe IR sensitivity and little or no cross-linking agent sensitivity is observed (26 , 31) . Induced chromosomal aberrations are also frequent in NHEJ mutants, although spontaneous instability is not uniformly observed in cells with reduced NHEJ (32, 33, 34, 35) . An additional emerging characteristic that may be attributable to defects in HDR is that of centrosome abnormalities, which have been observed in XRCC2, XRCC3, BRCA1, and BRCA2 mutant cells, in contrast with the lack of abnormalities in cells defective for NHEJ (27 , 34 , 36 , 37) . Thus, a proportion of gross chromosome abnormalities may result from chromosome missegregation. Although aneuploidy was not evident in Brca1-deficient ES cells, it is commonly observed in other HDR mutant cells.

Gross chromosomal instability is observed in MEFs and tumor cells derived from mice harboring Brca1 hypomorphic alleles (11 , 27 , 28) . However, as shown here, ES cells harboring similar hypomorphic Brca1 alleles have chromosome instability that is much less pronounced, suggesting that MEFs (as well as tumors) may be inherently prone to accumulate damage. The ES cell ultimately is required to generate all tissues of the adult organism and therefore may be exquisitely sensitive to a very low threshold of genetic change. As the cell cycle distribution of the mutant ES cells is normal, increased cell death may eliminate cells with unrepaired damage. Recently it has been shown that although p53 accumulates during stalled DNA replication, it is functionally impaired, suggesting repression of the p53 response during S-phase arrest (38) . One possibility for the lack of aneuploidy is that p53 function is less tightly regulated during replication blocks in ES cells, resulting in the elimination of cells when unrepaired chromosome breaks are encountered.

We found that correction of a mutant Brca1 allele led to complete rescue of the repair phenotypes, yet transgene expression of Brca1, even from a Brca1 promoter, led to only partial complementation. It remains uncertain why transgene rescue was incomplete; however, these results point to the difficulty of ectopic expression and suggest that a larger genomic region is necessary for proper regulation of Brca1 gene expression. Previously, transgene expression was shown to be insufficient for even partial restoration of normal gene-targeting efficiency in the Brca1 mutant cell line (16) . It is possible that targeting at loci tested in this previous study had a more stringent requirement for normal Brca1 levels than the pim1 locus. Nevertheless, Brca1 transgene expression led to a robust 10-fold improvement in pim1 targeting, which was confirmed by molecular analysis.

We expect that HDR of a chromosomal DSB is more physiologically relevant than gene targeting. In HDR assays, Brca1 transgene expression led to increased recombination, improving it to an intermediate level as seen for the other repair phenotypes. DSBs arising from exogenous sources like I-Sce I are potent inducers of recombination between sister-chromatids, which are templates for repair after DNA replication (39) . DSBs may also arise during normal S-phase progression in mammalian cells from replication fork disruption, such that HDR is required to restart the fork for a proper completion of replication as in E. coli (40) . Consistent with a similar role in mammalian cells is the colocalization of BRCA1 with PCNA after hydroxyurea treatment of cells (13) .

Mice and cells harboring a Brca1 mutation that deletes exon 11 are considered to be hypomorphic but not null for Brca1, because null alleles cause early embryonic lethality, whereas mice with an exon 11 deletion can survive at low frequency on a p53 background (41) . These mice have underdeveloped mammary glands, as do mice with an exon 11 deletion specifically targeted to breast tissue, consistent with impaired cellular proliferation (28 , 41) . It is possible that extended viability results from residual HDR, because, even if diminished, we find that HDR is not completely abrogated by the exon 11 deletion. Although the role of nuclear foci is uncertain, Rad51 foci are also not completely abrogated in this cell line, consistent with residual HDR (17) .

Spliced isoforms of BRCA1 found in vivo include BRCA1{Delta}11b and BRCA1{Delta}672–4095 (42 , 43) . Some lack the nuclear localization signals that are present in the 5' end of exon 11 and are predominantly located in the cytoplasm (42 , 43) . The cytoplasmic localization of these products would seem to be predictive of a HDR defect, as improper cellular localization of BRCA2 and, surprisingly, Rad51 has been implicated as the mechanism for defective HDR observed in cells with a BRCA2 mutation (44) . The exon 11 splice variants would still be expected to interact with other proteins, such as BARD1 or other BRCA1 RING-interacting proteins and the BRCT interacting proteins, as these interactions involve NH2- and COOH-terminal sequences, respectively, rather than the central exon 11 encoded sequences (45) . Nevertheless, functions arising from these interactions may be compromised through sequestration of these interacting proteins in the cytoplasm. The recently described BRCA1 nuclear export sequence suggests that this protein does not reside solely in the nucleus but may shuttle between the cytoplasm and nucleus (46) . However, a direct functional analysis of these endogenous spliced products has not been performed.

Heterozygosity for a BRCA1 mutation in humans results in a predisposition to early-onset breast and ovarian cancer. This predisposition is incurred when the remaining wild-type allele is lost or mutated, as is the case for classical tumor suppressor genes. A phenotype for the heterozygote state has been inferred for some tumor suppressor gene mutations through a dominant- negative phenotype (47 , 48) . Evidence for loss of tumor suppression solely from haploinsufficiency is less well documented (49 , 50) . A heterozygote phenotype for viability or tumorigenesis has not been reported in mice with targeted Brca1 alleles, and thus far human tumors derived from BRCA1 mutation carriers consistently reveal a loss of the wild-type allele. However, subtle changes in ovary and breast morphology have been described in mice heterozygous for either Brca1 or Brca2 mutations (51) . Furthermore, it has been reported that cells from BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are more radiosensitive than cells from wild-type individuals (24) . In our analysis of the Brca1+/- cells, there was no decrease in the ability to gene target, repair a DSB by gene conversion, or maintain genetic integrity or mitomycin-C resistance. However, only partial complementation of repair defects was found with low transgene expression, which measured 10- 20% of wild-type Brca1 expression. Therefore, the possibility remains that a significant reduction in the expression of BRCA1 or the presence of dominant-negative truncated alleles may impart functional consequences that predispose to tumorigenesis, especially under conditions of increased DNA damage or increased proliferation.

We have found that Brca1-/- cells exhibit nearly 100-fold sensitivity as compared with the Brca1+/+ cells after treatment with mitomycin-C at the LD50 for wild-type cells. Recently, it was shown that in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the pathways used in the repair of cisplatin-induced interstrand cross-links were cell cycle dependent. The intermediate in the repair of the interstrand cross-links in dividing cells is a DSB that is repaired by homologous recombination (52) . Agents that produce DNA interstrand cross-links are some of the most effective antitumor agents in clinical use, although their use is often limited by the toxicity incurred in normal cells. If the preference for HDR in cycling mammalian cells is preserved, it suggests that the exquisite sensitivity of Brca1-deficient cells to interstrand cross-linking agents may provide an extremely favorable therapeutic ratio in the treatment of tumors derived from BRCA1 mutation. This hypothesis can be explored in the recently derived Brca1-deficient mouse mammary tumors (28) .

The predominant function of BRCA1 that suppresses tumorigenesis has been difficult to determine, likely because of the tightly coordinated functions of DNA damage signaling, repair, and transcriptional regulation of cellular damage response genes. Genes involved in limiting chromosome aberrations would be anticipated to act cooperatively with both cell checkpoints and transcription machinery. An expectation supported by this study is that cells with defective DNA DSB repair develop chromosome instability that leads to a selective advantage either in cell growth or in the suppression of cell death and, ultimately, to tumorigenesis.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. Beverly Koller (University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC) for providing the Brca1-/- 236.44 ES and Brca1-/-, tgt cell lines.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 This work was supported by DAMD17-98-1-8334 from the Department of the Army, 1P50CA68425 from the NIH Specialized Program of Research Excellence in Breast Cancer, and the Breast Cancer Research Fund. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue New York, NY 10021. Phone: (212) 639-2168; Fax: (212) 717-3821; E-mail: moynaham{at}mskcc.org Back

3 Current address: Department of Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109. Back

4 The abbreviations used are: DSB, double-strand break; IR, ionizing radiation; ES, embryonic stem; NHEJ, nonhomologous end-joining; HDR, homology-directed repair; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; Tg, transgene; pBS, pBluescript; purR, puromycin-resistant; hygR, hygromycin-resistant; DR-GFP, direct repeat-green fluorescent protein; neo, neomycin phosphoribosyl transferase; hprt, hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase; XRCC, X-ray cross-complementing repair. Back

Received 1/22/01. Accepted 5/ 2/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gowen L. C., Avrutskaya A. V., Latour A. M., Koller B. H., Leadon S. A. BRCA1 required for transcription-coupled repair of oxidative DNA damage. Science (Wash. DC), 281: 1009-1012, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Moynahan M. E., Chiu J. W., Koller B. H., Jasin M. Brca1 controls homology-directed DNA repair. Mol. Cell, 4: 511-518, 1999.[Medline]
  3. Scully R., Ganesan S., Vlasakova K., Chen J., Socolovsky M., Livingston D. M. Genetic analysis of BRCA1 function in a defined tumor cell line. Mol. Cell, 4: 1093-1099, 1999.[Medline]
  4. Cortez D., Wang Y., Qin J., Elledge S. J. Requirement of ATM-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA1 in the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks. Science (Wash. DC), 286: 1162-1166, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tibbetts R. S., Cortez D., Brumbaugh K. M., Scully R., Livingston D., Elledge S. J., Abraham R. T. Functional interactions between BRCA1 and the checkpoint kinase ATR during genotoxic stress. Genes Dev., 14: 2989-3002, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lee J. S., Collins K. M., Brown A. L., Lee C. H., Chung J. H. hCds1-mediated phosphorylation of BRCA1 regulates the DNA damage response. Nature (Lond.), 404: 201-204, 2000.[Medline]
  7. Chai Y. L., Cui J., Shao N., Shyam E., Reddy P., Rao V. N. The second BRCT domain of BRCA1 proteins interacts with p53 and stimulates transcription from the p21WAF1/CIP1 promoter. Oncogene, 18: 263-268, 1999.[Medline]
  8. Li S., Chen P. L., Subramanian T., Chinnadurai G., Tomlinson G., Osborne C. K., Sharp Z. D., Lee W. H. Binding of CtIP to the BRCT repeats of BRCA1 involved in the transcription regulation of p21 is disrupted upon DNA damage. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 11334-11338, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Li S., Ting N. S., Zheng L., Chen P. L., Ziv Y., Shiloh Y., Lee E. Y., Lee W. H. Functional link of BRCA1 and ataxia telangiectasia gene product in DNA damage response. Nature (Lond.), 406: 210-215, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Wang Y., Cortez D., Yazdi P., Neff N., Elledge S. J., Qin J. BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. Genes Dev., 14: 927-939, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shen S. X., Weaver Z., Xu X., Li C., Weinstein M., Chen L., Guan X. Y., Ried T., Deng C. X. A targeted disruption of the murine Brca1 gene causes {gamma}-irradiation hypersensitivity and genetic instability. Oncogene, 17: 3115-3124, 1998.[Medline]
  12. Scully R., Chen J., Plug A., Xiao Y., Weaver D., Feunteun J., Ashley T., Livingston D. M. Association of BRCA1 with Rad51 in mitotic and meiotic cells. Cell, 88: 265-275, 1997.[Medline]
  13. Scully R., Chen J., Ochs R. L., Keegan K., Hoekstra M., Feunteun J., Livingston D. M. Dynamic changes of BRCA1 subnuclear location and phosphorylation state are initiated by DNA damage. Cell, 90: 425-435, 1997.[Medline]
  14. Zhong Q., Chen C. F., Li S., Chen Y., Wang C. C., Xiao J., Chen P. L., Sharp Z. D., Lee W. H. Association of BRCA1 with the hRad50-hMre11–p95 complex and the DNA damage response. Science (Wash. DC), 285: 747-750, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Gowen L. C., Johnson B. L., Latour A. M., Sulik K. K., Koller B. H. Brca1 deficiency results in early embryonic lethality characterized by neuroepithelial abnormalities. Nat. Genet., 12: 191-194, 1996.[Medline]
  16. Snouwaert J. N., Gowen L. C., Latour A. M., Mohn A. R., Xiao A., DiBiase L., Koller B. H. BRCA1 deficient embryonic stem cells display a decreased homologous recombination frequency and an increased frequency of non-homologous recombination that is corrected by expression of a Brca1 transgene. Oncogene, 18: 7900-7907, 1999.[Medline]
  17. Bhattacharyya A., Ear U. S., Koller B. H., Weichselbaum R. R., Bishop D. K. The breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1 is required for subnuclear assembly of Rad51 and survival following treatment with the DNA cross-linking agent cisplatin. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 23899-23903, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Moynahan M. E., Pierce A. J., Jasin M. BRCA2 is required for homology-directed repair of chromosomal breaks. Mol. Cell, 7: 263-272, 2001.[Medline]
  19. Moynahan M. E., Jasin M. Loss of heterozygosity induced by a chromosomal double-strand break. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 8988-8993, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Richardson C., Moynahan M. E., Jasin M. Double-strand break repair by interchromosomal recombination: suppression of chromosomal translocations. Genes Dev., 12: 3831-3842, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Pierce A. J., Johnson R. D., Thompson L. H., Jasin M. XRCC3 promotes homology-directed repair of DNA damage in mammalian cells. Genes Dev., 13: 2633-2638, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Essers J., Hendriks R. W., Swagemakers S. M., Troelstra C., de Wit J., Bootsma D., Hoeijmakers J. H., Kanaar R. Disruption of mouse RAD54 reduces ionizing radiation resistance and homologous recombination. Cell, 89: 195-204, 1997.[Medline]
  23. te Riele H., Maandag E. R., Clarke A., Hooper M., Berns A. Consecutive inactivation of both alleles of the pim-1 proto-oncogene by homologous recombination in embryonic stem cells. Nature (Lond.), 348: 649-651, 1990.[Medline]
  24. Foray N., Randrianarison V., Marot D., Perricaudet M., Lenoir G., Feunteun J. {gamma}-rays-induced death of human cells carrying mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2. Oncogene, 18: 7334-7342, 1999.[Medline]
  25. Liu N., Lamerdin J. E., Tebbs R. S., Schild D., Tucker J. D., Shen M. R., Brookman K. W., Siciliano M. J., Walter C. A., Fan W., Narayana L. S., Zhou Z. Q., Adamson A. W., Sorensen K. J., Chen D. J., Jones N. J., Thompson L. H. XRCC2 and XRCC3, new human Rad51-family members, promote chromosome stability and protect against DNA cross-links and other damages. Mol. Cell, 1: 783-793, 1998.[Medline]
  26. De Silva I. U., McHugh P. J., Clingen P. H., Hartley J. A. Defining the roles of nucleotide excision repair and recombination in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in mammalian cells. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 7980-7990, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Xu X., Weaver Z., Linke S. P., Li C., Gotay J., Wang X. W., Harris C. C., Ried T., Deng C. X. Centrosome amplification and a defective G2-M cell cycle checkpoint induce genetic instability in BRCA1 exon 11 isoform-deficient cells. Mol. Cell, 3: 389-395, 1999.[Medline]
  28. Xu X., Wagner K. U., Larson D., Weaver Z., Li C., Ried T., Hennighausen L., Wynshaw-Boris A., Deng C. X. Conditional mutation of Brca1 in mammary epithelial cells results in blunted ductal morphogenesis and tumour formation. Nat. Genet., 22: 37-43, 1999.[Medline]
  29. Cui X., Brenneman M., Meyne J., Oshimura M., Goodwin E. H., Chen D. J. The XRCC2 and XRCC3 repair genes are required for chromosome stability in mammalian cells. Mutat. Res., 434: 75-88, 1999.[Medline]
  30. Yu V. P., Koehler M., Steinlein C., Schmid M., Hanakahi L. A., van Gool A. J., West S. C., Venkitaraman A. R. Gross chromosomal rearrangements and genetic exchange between nonhomologous chromosomes following BRCA2 inactivation. Genes Dev., 14: 1400-1406, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Caldecott K. W., Jeggo P. A. Cross-sensitivity of {gamma}-ray-sensitive hamster mutants to cross-linking agents. Mutat. Res., 255: 111-121, 1991.[Medline]
  32. Kemp L. M., Jeggo P. A. Radiation-induced chromosome damage in X-ray-sensitive mutants (xrs) of the Chinese hamster ovary cell line. Mutat. Res., 166: 255-263, 1986.[Medline]
  33. Karanjawala Z. E., Grawunder U., Hsieh C. L., Lieber M. R. The nonhomologous DNA end joining pathway is important for chromosome stability in primary fibroblasts. Curr. Biol., 9: 1501-1504, 1999.[Medline]
  34. Difilippantonio M. J., Zhu J., Chen H. T., Meffre E., Nussenzweig M. C., Max E. E., Ried T., Nussenzweig A. DNA repair protein Ku80 suppresses chromosomal aberrations and malignant transformation. Nature (Lond.), 404: 510-514, 2000.[Medline]
  35. Gao Y., Ferguson D. O., Xie W., Manis J. P., Sekiguchi J., Frank K. M., Chaudhuri J., Horner J., DePinho R. A., Alt F. W. Interplay of p53 and DNA-repair protein XRCC4 in tumorigenesis, genomic stability and development. Nature (Lond.), 404: 897-900, 2000.[Medline]
  36. Griffin C. S., Simpson P. J., Wilson C. R., Thacker J. Mammalian recombination-repair genes XRCC2 and XRCC3 promote correct chromosome segregation. Nat. Cell Biol., 2: 757-761, 2000.[Medline]
  37. Tutt A., Gabriel A., Bertwistle D., Connor F., Paterson H., Peacock J., Ross G., Ashworth A. Absence of Brca2 causes genome instability by chromosome breakage and loss associated with centrosome amplification. Curr. Biol., 9: 1107-1110, 1999.[Medline]
  38. Gottifredi V., Shieh S. Y., Taya Y., Prives C. p53 accumulates but is functionally impaired when DNA synthesis is blocked. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 98: 1036-1041, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Johnson R. D., Jasin M. Sister chromatid gene conversion is a prominent double-strand break repair pathway in mammalian cells. EMBO J., 19: 3398-3407, 2000.[Medline]
  40. Marians K. J. PriA-directed replication fork restart in Escherichia coli. Trends Biochem. Sci., 25: 185-189, 2000.[Medline]
  41. Cressman V. L., Backlund D. C., Avrutskaya A. V., Leadon S. A., Godfrey V., Koller B. H. Growth retardation, DNA repair defects, and lack of spermatogenesis in BRCA1-deficient mice. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 7061-7075, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Thakur S., Zhang H. B., Peng Y., Le H., Carroll B., Ward T., Yao J., Farid L. M., Couch F. J., Wilson R. B., Weber B. L. Localization of BRCA1 and a splice variant identifies the nuclear localization signal. Mol. Cell. Biol., 17: 444-452, 1997.[Abstract]
  43. Wilson C. A., Payton M. N., Elliott G. S., Buaas F. W., Cajulis E. E., Grosshans D., Ramos L., Reese D. M., Slamon D. J., Calzone F. J. Differential subcellular localization, expression and biological toxicity of BRCA1 and the splice variant BRCA1-{delta}11b. Oncogene, 14: 1-16, 1997.[Medline]
  44. Davies A. A., Mason J-Y., McIlwraith M. J., Stasiak A. Z., Venkitaraman A. R., West S. C. Role of BRCA2 in control of the Rad51 recombination and DNA repair protein. Mol. Cell, 4: 273-282, 2001.
  45. Deng C. X., Brodie S. G. Roles of BRCA1 and its interacting proteins. Bioessays, 22: 728-737, 2000.[Medline]
  46. Rodriguez J. A., Henderson B. R. Identification of a functional nuclear export sequence in BRCA1. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 38589-38596, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  47. Gualberto A., Aldape K., Kozakiewicz K., Tlsty T. D. An oncogenic form of p53 confers a dominant, gain-of-function phenotype that disrupts spindle checkpoint control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 5166-5171, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  48. Blandino G., Levine A. J., Oren M. Mutant p53 gain of function: differential effects of different p53 mutants on resistance of cultured cells to chemotherapy. Oncogene, 18: 477-485, 1999.[Medline]
  49. Fero M. L., Randel E., Gurley K. E., Roberts J. M., Kemp C. J. The murine gene p27Kip1 is haplo-insufficient for tumour suppression. Nature (Lond.), 396: 177-180, 1998.[Medline]
  50. Venkatachalam S., Shi Y. P., Jones S. N., Vogel H., Bradley A., Pinkel D., Donehower L. A. Retention of wild-type p53 in tumors from p53 heterozygous mice: reduction of p53 dosage can promote cancer formation. EMBO J., 17: 4657-4667, 1998.[Medline]
  51. Bennett L. M., McAllister K. A., Malphurs J., Ward T., Collins N. K., Seely J. C., Gowen L. C., Koller B. H., Davis B. J., Wiseman R. W. Mice heterozygous for a Brca1 or Brca2 mutation display distinct mammary gland and ovarian phenotypes in response to diethylstilbestrol. Cancer Res., 60: 3461-3469, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  52. McHugh P. J., Sones W. R., Hartley J. A. Repair of intermediate structures produced at DNA interstrand cross-links in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 3425-3433, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
S. M. H. Sy, M. S. Y. Huen, and J. Chen
PALB2 is an integral component of the BRCA complex required for homologous recombination repair
PNAS, April 28, 2009; 106(17): 7155 - 7160.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
M. Santarosa, L. Del Col, E. Tonin, A. Caragnano, A. Viel, and R. Maestro
Premature senescence is a major response to DNA cross-linking agents in BRCA1-defective cells: implication for tailored treatments of BRCA1 mutation carriers
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2009; 8(4): 844 - 854.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
L. J. Reid, R. Shakya, A. P. Modi, M. Lokshin, J.-T. Cheng, M. Jasin, R. Baer, and T. Ludwig
E3 ligase activity of BRCA1 is not essential for mammalian cell viability or homology-directed repair of double-strand DNA breaks
PNAS, December 30, 2008; 105(52): 20876 - 20881.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann OncolHome page
B. Sirohi, M. Arnedos, S. Popat, S. Ashley, A. Nerurkar, G. Walsh, S. Johnston, and I. E. Smith
Platinum-based chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
Ann. Onc., November 1, 2008; 19(11): 1847 - 1852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
J. I. Weberpals, K. V. Clark-Knowles, and B. C. Vanderhyden
Sporadic Epithelial Ovarian Cancer: Clinical Relevance of BRCA1 Inhibition in the DNA Damage and Repair Pathway
J. Clin. Oncol., July 1, 2008; 26(19): 3259 - 3267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
R. Shakya, M. Szabolcs, E. McCarthy, E. Ospina, K. Basso, S. Nandula, V. Murty, R. Baer, and T. Ludwig
The basal-like mammary carcinomas induced by Brca1 or Bard1 inactivation implicate the BRCA1/BARD1 heterodimer in tumor suppression
PNAS, May 13, 2008; 105(19): 7040 - 7045.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Seong, M. G. Sehorn, I. Plate, I. Shi, B. Song, P. Chi, U. Mortensen, P. Sung, and L. Krejci
Molecular Anatomy of the Recombination Mediator Function of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad52
J. Biol. Chem., May 2, 2008; 283(18): 12166 - 12174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
L. Chen, C. J. Nievera, A. Y.-L. Lee, and X. Wu
Cell Cycle-dependent Complex Formation of BRCA1{middle dot}CtIP{middle dot}MRN Is Important for DNA Double-strand Break Repair
J. Biol. Chem., March 21, 2008; 283(12): 7713 - 7720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Mechilli, A. Schinoppi, K. Kobos, A. T. Natarajan, and F. Palitti
DNA repair deficiency and acetaldehyde-induced chromosomal alterations in CHO cells
Mutagenesis, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 51 - 56.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
M. Laufer, S. V. Nandula, A. P. Modi, S. Wang, M. Jasin, V. V. V. S. Murty, T. Ludwig, and R. Baer
Structural Requirements for the BARD1 Tumor Suppressor in Chromosomal Stability and Homology-directed DNA Repair
J. Biol. Chem., November 23, 2007; 282(47): 34325 - 34333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
haematolHome page
M. A. Dimopoulos, V. L. Souliotis, A. Anagnostopoulos, C. Bamia, A. Pouli, I. Baltadakis, E. Terpos, S. A. Kyrtopoulos, and P. P. Sfikakis
Melphalan-induced DNA damage in vitro as a predictor for clinical outcome in multiple myeloma
Haematologica, November 1, 2007; 92(11): 1505 - 1512.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. D. Treszezamsky, L. A. Kachnic, Z. Feng, J. Zhang, C. Tokadjian, and S. N. Powell
BRCA1- and BRCA2-Deficient Cells Are Sensitive to Etoposide-Induced DNA Double-Strand Breaks via Topoisomerase II
Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7078 - 7081.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
C. R. James, J. E. Quinn, P. B. Mullan, P. G. Johnston, and D. P. Harkin
BRCA1, a Potential Predictive Biomarker in the Treatment of Breast Cancer
Oncologist, February 1, 2007; 12(2): 142 - 150.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
S. Shanley, K. McReynolds, A. Ardern-Jones, R. Ahern, I. Fernando, J. Yarnold, G. Evans, D. Eccles, S. Hodgson, S. Ashley, et al.
Acute Chemotherapy-Related Toxicity Is Not Increased in BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers Treated for Breast Cancer in the United Kingdom
Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2006; 12(23): 7033 - 7038.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
S. V. Diaz-Perez, D. O. Ferguson, C. Wang, G. Csankovszki, C. Wang, S.-C. Tsai, D. Dutta, V. Perez, S. Kim, C. D. Eller, et al.
A Deletion at the Mouse Xist Gene Exposes Trans-effects That Alter the Heterochromatin of the Inactive X Chromosome and the Replication Time and DNA Stability of Both X Chromosomes
Genetics, November 1, 2006; 174(3): 1115 - 1133.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann. Surg. Oncol.Home page
N. S. Sivarajasingham, L. Cawkwell, R. P. Baker, S. L. O'Kane, E. F. Smyth, J. V. T. Tilsed, M. B. Watson, J. Greenman, and J. R. T. Monson
Implication of the BRCA2 and Putative ''BRCA3'' Genes in Dukes' Stage C, Replication Error-Negative Colon Cancer
Ann. Surg. Oncol., June 1, 2006; 13(6): 881 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. I. Yarden and M. Z. Papa
BRCA1 at the crossroad of multiple cellular pathways: approaches for therapeutic interventions.
Mol. Cancer Ther., June 1, 2006; 5(6): 1396 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. M. Simons, A. A. Horwitz, L. M. Starita, K. Griffin, R. S. Williams, J.N. M. Glover, and J. D. Parvin
BRCA1 DNA-Binding Activity Is Stimulated by BARD1
Cancer Res., February 15, 2006; 66(4): 2012 - 2018.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Cousineau, C. Abaji, and A. Belmaaza
BRCA1 Regulates RAD51 Function in Response to DNA Damage and Suppresses Spontaneous Sister Chromatid Replication Slippage: Implications for Sister Chromatid Cohesion, Genome Stability, and Carcinogenesis
Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 65(24): 11384 - 11391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
R. D. Kennedy and A. D. D'Andrea
The Fanconi Anemia/BRCA pathway: new faces in the crowd
Genes & Dev., December 15, 2005; 19(24): 2925 - 2940.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Cancer ResHome page
J. Zhang and S. N. Powell
The Role of the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor in DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Mol. Cancer Res., October 1, 2005; 3(10): 531 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. D. Choudhury, H. Xu, A. P. Modi, W. Zhang, T. Ludwig, and R. Baer
Hyperphosphorylation of the BARD1 Tumor Suppressor in Mitotic Cells
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 24669 - 24679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
S. A. Narod and K. Offit
Prevention and Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 10, 2005; 23(8): 1656 - 1663.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
K. Trenz, P. Schutz, and G. Speit
Radiosensitivity of lymphoblastoid cell lines with a heterozygous BRCA1 mutation is not detected by the comet assay and pulsed field gel electrophoresis
Mutagenesis, March 1, 2005; 20(2): 131 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
K. Nakanishi, Y.-G. Yang, A. J. Pierce, T. Taniguchi, M. Digweed, A. D. D'Andrea, Z.-Q. Wang, and M. Jasin
Human Fanconi anemia monoubiquitination pathway promotes homologous DNA repair
PNAS, January 25, 2005; 102(4): 1110 - 1115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant BiolHome page
A.N.J. TUTT, C.J. LORD, N. MCCABE, H. FARMER, N. TURNER, N.M. MARTIN, S.P. JACKSON, G.C.M. SMITH, and A. ASHWORTH
Exploiting the DNA Repair Defect in BRCA Mutant Cells in the Design of New Therapeutic Strategies for Cancer
Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 139 - 148.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. D. Kennedy, J. E. Quinn, P. B. Mullan, P. G. Johnston, and D. P. Harkin
The Role of BRCA1 in the Cellular Response to Chemotherapy
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 17, 2004; 96(22): 1659 - 1668.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. M. Stark, A. J. Pierce, J. Oh, A. Pastink, and M. Jasin
Genetic Steps of Mammalian Homologous Repair with Distinct Mutagenic Consequences
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2004; 24(21): 9305 - 9316.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Y. Canitrot, J.-P. Capp, N. Puget, A. Bieth, B. Lopez, J.-S. Hoffmann, and C. Cazaux
DNA polymerase {beta} overexpression stimulates the Rad51-dependent homologous recombination in mammalian cells
Nucleic Acids Res., September 27, 2004; 32(17): 5104 - 5112.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
A. D. Choudhury, H. Xu, and R. Baer
Ubiquitination and Proteasomal Degradation of the BRCA1 Tumor Suppressor Is Regulated during Cell Cycle Progression
J. Biol. Chem., August 6, 2004; 279(32): 33909 - 33918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
M. S. Van der Heijden, J. R. Brody, E. Gallmeier, S. C. Cunningham, D. A. Dezentje, D. Shen, R. H. Hruban, and S. E. Kern
Functional Defects in the Fanconi Anemia Pathway in Pancreatic Cancer Cells
Am. J. Pathol., August 1, 2004; 165(2): 651 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. S. Boehden, A. Restle, R. Marschalek, C. Stocking, and L. Wiesmuller
Recombination at chromosomal sequences involved in leukaemogenic rearrangements is differentially regulated by p53
Carcinogenesis, August 1, 2004; 25(8): 1305 - 1313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
P. Morales-Ramirez, T. Vallarino-Kelly, V. L. Cruz-Vallejo, R. Lopez-Iturbe, and H. Alvaro-Delgadillo
In vivo kinetics of micronuclei induction by bifunctional alkylating antineoplastics
Mutagenesis, May 1, 2004; 19(3): 207 - 213.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. Zhang, H. Willers, Z. Feng, J. C. Ghosh, S. Kim, D. T. Weaver, J. H. Chung, S. N. Powell, and F. Xia
Chk2 Phosphorylation of BRCA1 Regulates DNA Double-Strand Break Repair
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2004; 24(2): 708 - 718.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
A. Rothfuss and M. Grompe
Repair Kinetics of Genomic Interstrand DNA Cross-Links: Evidence for DNA Double-Strand Break-Dependent Activation of the Fanconi Anemia/BRCA Pathway
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 1, 2004; 24(1): 123 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Seal, R. Barfoot, H. Jayatilake, P. Smith, A. Renwick, L. Bascombe, L. McGuffog, D. G. Evans, D. Eccles, D. F. Easton, et al.
Evaluation of Fanconi Anemia Genes in Familial Breast Cancer Predisposition
Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8596 - 8599.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Deans, C. S. Griffin, P. O'Regan, M. Jasin, and J. Thacker
Homologous Recombination Deficiency Leads to Profound Genetic Instability in Cells Derived from Xrcc2-Knockout Mice
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8181 - 8187.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
U. K. Westermark, M. Reyngold, A. B. Olshen, R. Baer, M. Jasin, and M. E. Moynahan
BARD1 Participates with BRCA1 in Homology-Directed Repair of Chromosome Breaks
Mol. Cell. Biol., November 1, 2003; 23(21): 7926 - 7936.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
J. E. Quinn, R. D. Kennedy, P. B. Mullan, P. M. Gilmore, M. Carty, P. G. Johnston, D. P. Harkin, U. Benatti, L. C. Boffa, and M. Ferrarini
BRCA1 Functions as a Differential Modulator of Chemotherapy-induced Apoptosis
Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6221 - 6228.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
S. Houghtaling, C. Timmers, M. Noll, M. J. Finegold, S. N. Jones, M. S. Meyn, and M. Grompe
Epithelial cancer in Fanconi anemia complementation group D2 (Fancd2) knockout mice
Genes & Dev., August 15, 2003; 17(16): 2021 - 2035.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. L. Donahue, R. Lundberg, R. Saplis, and C. Campbell
Deficient Regulation of DNA Double-strand Break Repair in Fanconi Anemia Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29487 - 29495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
E. E. McCarthy, J. T. Celebi, R. Baer, and T. Ludwig
Loss of Bard1, the Heterodimeric Partner of the Brca1 Tumor Suppressor, Results in Early Embryonic Lethality and Chromosomal Instability
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2003; 23(14): 5056 - 5063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. S. van der Heijden, C. J. Yeo, R. H. Hruban, and S. E. Kern
Fanconi Anemia Gene Mutations in Young-onset Pancreatic Cancer
Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2585 - 2588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DevelopmentHome page
X. Xu, O. Aprelikova, P. Moens, C.-X. Deng, and P. A. Furth
Impaired meiotic DNA-damage repair and lack of crossing-over during spermatogenesis in BRCA1 full-length isoform deficient mice
Development, May 1, 2003; 130(9): 2001 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
C.-X. Deng and R.-H. Wang
Roles of BRCA1 in DNA damage repair: a link between development and cancer
Hum. Mol. Genet., April 2, 2003; 12(90001): R113 - 123.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. M. Stark and M. Jasin
Extensive Loss of Heterozygosity Is Suppressed during Homologous Repair of Chromosomal Breaks
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 733 - 743.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
H. Zheng, X. Wang, A. J. Warren, R. J. Legerski, R. S. Nairn, J. W. Hamilton, and L. Li
Nucleotide Excision Repair- and Polymerase {eta}-Mediated Error-Prone Removal of Mitomycin C Interstrand Cross-Links
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2003; 23(2): 754 - 761.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. L. Donahue and C. Campbell
A DNA Double Strand Break Repair Defect in Fanconi Anemia Fibroblasts
J. Biol. Chem., November 22, 2002; 277(48): 46243 - 46247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Taniguchi, I. Garcia-Higuera, P. R. Andreassen, R. C. Gregory, M. Grompe, and A. D. D'Andrea
S-phase-specific interaction of the Fanconi anemia protein, FANCD2, with BRCA1 and RAD51
Blood, September 18, 2002; 100(7): 2414 - 2420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
T. Taniguchi and A. D. D'Andrea
The Fanconi anemia protein, FANCE, promotes the nuclear accumulation of FANCC
Blood, September 18, 2002; 100(7): 2457 - 2462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
N. G. Howlett, T. Taniguchi, S. Olson, B. Cox, Q. Waisfisz, C. de Die-Smulders, N. Persky, M. Grompe, H. Joenje, G. Pals, et al.
Biallelic Inactivation of BRCA2 in Fanconi Anemia
Science, July 26, 2002; 297(5581): 606 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. M. Stark, P. Hu, A. J. Pierce, M. E. Moynahan, N. Ellis, and M. Jasin
ATP Hydrolysis by Mammalian RAD51 Has a Key Role during Homology-directed DNA Repair
J. Biol. Chem., May 31, 2002; 277(23): 20185 - 20194.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genes Dev.Home page
W. S. Joo, P. D. Jeffrey, S. B. Cantor, M. S. Finnin, D. M. Livingston, and N. P. Pavletich
Structure of the 53BP1 BRCT region bound to p53 and its comparison to the Brca1 BRCT structure
Genes & Dev., March 1, 2002; 16(5): 583 - 593.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Kraakman-van der Zwet, W. J. I. Overkamp, R. E. E. van Lange, J. Essers, A. van Duijn-Goedhart, I. Wiggers, S. Swaminathan, P. P. W. van Buul, A. Errami, R. T. L. Tan, et al.
Brca2 (XRCC11) Deficiency Results in Radioresistant DNA Synthesis and a Higher Frequency of Spontaneous Deletions
Mol. Cell. Biol., January 15, 2002; 22(2): 669 - 679.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum Mol GenetHome page
M. Grompe and A. D'Andrea
Fanconi anemia and DNA repair
Hum. Mol. Genet., October 1, 2001; 10(20): 2253 - 2259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moynahan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jasin, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Moynahan, M. E.
Right arrow Articles by Jasin, M.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online