Cancer Research Meeting Calendar  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
[Cancer Research 61, 4885-4891, June 15, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Inhibition of Epidermal Growth Factor-induced RhoA Translocation and Invasion of Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells by 3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitors1

Toshiyuki Kusama2, Mutsuko Mukai, Teruo Iwasaki, Masaharu Tatsuta, Yoshirou Matsumoto, Hitoshi Akedo and Hiroyuki Nakamura

Departments of Tumor Biochemistry [T. K., M. M., H. A., H. N.] and Gastrointestinal Oncology [M. T.], Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, Osaka 537-8511, Japan; First Department of Surgery, Yamanashi Medical University, Yamanashi 409-3898, Japan [T. K., Y. M.]; and First Department of Pathology, Hyogo College of Medicine, Nishinomiya 663-8501, Japan [T. I., H. A.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors prevent the conversion of HMG-CoA to mevalonate and thereby inhibit the synthesis of other products derived from this metabolite. This includes a number of small prenylated GTPases involved in cell growth, motility, and invasion. We studied the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (fluvastatin and lovastatin) on in vitro invasion of human pancreatic cancer PANC-1 cells. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) induced a dose-dependent increase of PANC-1 cell invasion in a modified Boyden chamber assay. Stimulation of cancer cells with EGF induced translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction and actin stress fiber assembly. Furthermore, Clostridium botulinum C3 transferase, a specific inhibitor of Rho, inhibited the ability of EGF to promote invasion, indicating that EGF-induced cancer cell invasion is regulated by Rho signaling. Treatment of PANC-1 cells with fluvastatin markedly attenuated EGF-induced translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction and actin stress fiber assembly, whereas it did not inhibit the tyrosine phosphorylation of EGF receptor and c-erbB-2. The induction of cancer cell invasion by EGF was inhibited by the addition of fluvastatin or lovastatin in a dose-dependent manner. The effects of fluvastatin or lovastatin on cell morphology and invasion were reversed by the addition of all-trans-geranylgeraniol but not by the addition of all-trans-farnesol. These results suggest that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors affect RhoA activation by preventing geranylgeranylation, which results in inhibition of EGF-induced invasiveness of human pancreatic cancer cells.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with an overall 5-year survival rate of less than 1% and a median survival of approximately 5–6 months (1 , 2) . One reason for this poor prognosis is the propensity of pancreatic cancer cells to invade adjacent tissues and to metastasize. Pancreatic cancer is often associated with the overexpression of a variety of mitogenic growth factors and their receptors, including EGF3 and related receptors, and this overexpression has been consistently found to play a leading role in the progression of pancreatic cancer (3) .

EGF has been reported to induce rapid alteration in the organization of the actin microfilament system, resulting in extensive membrane ruffling, lamellipodia formation, and cortical actin polymerization (4, 5, 6) . Actin cytoskeletal reorganization is regulated by the Rho family of small GTPases (7, 8, 9) . Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 regulate signal transduction from receptors in the membrane and a variety of cellular events related to cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, cell morphology, motility, and invasion, acting as molecular switches in the cell (10 , 11) . Previously, we reported several findings that support the involvement of Rho in cancer cell invasion (12 , 13) . Furthermore, the translocation of Rho protein from the cytosol to the plasma membrane has been implicated in cancer cell invasion (14 , 15) .

HMG-CoA reductase inhibition causes a block of the biochemical pathway, leading to the biosynthesis of farnesyl and geranylgeranyl PPis (16 , 17) . These isoprenoids are covalently linked to cysteine residues located at discrete sites near the COOH-terminal end of target proteins by a reaction catalyzed by specific transferases. Protein targets for isoprenylation include small G proteins, which require this posttranslational modification to undergo a series of changes that lead to their attachment to the plasma membranes and their full function (18) . Although HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been extensively studied as possible chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of cancer cell growth (19) , invasion (20 , 21) , and metastasis (20, 21, 22, 23) , no detailed data have been provided as yet on the exact mechanism(s) of their inhibitory effect on cancer cell invasion. In the present study, we show that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors markedly attenuate EGF-induced translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction, actin stress fiber assembly, and the in vitro invasive capacity of human pancreatic cancer cells.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Materials.
C3 was kindly supplied by Dr. B. Syuto, Department of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Agriculture, Iwate University (Morioka, Japan). The following materials were purchased from the sources indicated: (a) FBS, BioWhittaker (Walkersville, MD); (b) RPMI 1640, Life Technologies, Inc. (Grand Island, NY); (c) recombinant human EGF, Austral Biologicals (San Ramon, CA); (d) growth factor-reduced Matrigel, Becton Dickinson Labware (Bedford, MA); (e) Transwell chambers, Costar (Cambridge, MA); (f) PD 98059, Alexis (San Diego, CA); (g) lovastatin and genistein, Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan); (h) LY 294002 and wortmannin, Biomol Research Laboratories (Plymouth Meeting, PA); (i) anti-EGFR mAb, anti-c-erbB2 polyclonal Ab, and anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10, Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY); (j) mouse anti-RhoA mAb, rabbit anti-RhoA polyclonal Ab, and protein A/G-agarose, Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA); (k) rhodamine-phalloidin, Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR); (l) antirabbit IgG rohdamine-conjugated secondary Ab, BioSource (Camarillo, CA); and (m) all other chemicals and reagents, Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Fluvastatin was isolated from the marketed product (Tanabe Seiyaku Co., Osaka, Japan). It was dissolved at 30 mM in methanol and stored at -20°C.

Cells and Cell Cultures.
Human pancreatic cancer cell lines PANC-1 and ASPC-1 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA). Human pancreatic cancer cell line MIAPaCa-2, human colon cancer cell line WiDr, and human breast cancer cell line MCF-7 were obtained from the Japanese Cancer Research Resources Bank (Tokyo, Japan). Human pancreatic cancer cell line PSN-1 was a gift from the Genetics Division, National Cancer Research Institute (Tokyo, Japan). PANC-1 and MIAPaCa-2 cells were grown in DMEM; ASPC-1, PSN-1, and WiDr cells were grown in RPMI 1640; and MCF-7 cells were grown in MEM. All media were supplemented with 10% FBS, penicillin G (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml). Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% carbon dioxide.

Matrigel Invasion Assay.
Cell invasion through reconstituted basement membrane Matrigel was assayed by a method reported previously (24) . Briefly, polycarbonate membranes (8.0-µm pore size) of the upper compartment of Transwell culture chambers were coated with 5% Matrigel. Subconfluent cells were starved for 24 h and harvested with 0.05% trypsin containing 0.02% EDTA, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended at 1 x 106 cells/ml in serum-free medium with 0.1% fraction V BSA. The cell suspension (100 µl) was placed in the upper compartment, and the lower compartment was immediately filled with 600 µl of serum-free medium containing 0.1% BSA and the indicated ligand. After 16 h of incubation, the membranes were stained with May-Grunwald and Giemsa solution. Cells on the upper surface of the filter were removed carefully with a cotton swab, and the cells that had migrated through the membrane to the lower surface were counted in nine different fields under a light microscope at x400 magnification. Each experiment was performed in triplicate wells and repeated three times.

Immunofluorescence.
Cells were seeded onto 35-mm culture dishes and incubated for 1 h. Subsequently, the cells were incubated for 24 h in serum-free medium containing 0.1% BSA with the indicated additions and challenged with 1 nM EGF for the indicated time periods at 37°C. Cells were then fixed with 5% paraformaldehyde in PBS for 10 min, washed with PBS, permeabilized in 1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min, washed, and blocked with 1% BSA in TTBS. For visualization of filamentous actin, the cells were exposed to rhodamine-phalloidin for 30 min at 37°C and washed with TTBS. After final washes, coverslips were mounted on the dishes using a 50% solution of glycerol in PBS. The cells were examined under a fluorescence microscope Olympus BX50 (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan).

For RhoA staining, fixed and permeabilized cells were incubated for 2 h with rabbit anti-RhoA Ab diluted in 1% BSA-TTBS (1:200) for 2 h at 37°C, rinsed three times with TTBS, and then incubated for 30 min with a 1:80 dilution of antirabbit IgG rohdamine-conjugated secondary Ab.

Immunoblotting and Immunoprecipitation.
Serum-starved subconfluent cells were washed with cold PBS and solubilized in lysis buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP40, 0.1% SDS, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 2 mM sodium vanadate, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride for 30 min at 4°C. The lysate was homogenized and centrifuged at 15,000 rpm for 30 min at 4°C to remove debris, and the protein concentration was measured using a DC protein assay kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA) and adjusted to 1 mg/ml with lysis buffer. Lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to Fine trap NT-31 membranes (Nihon Eido, Tokyo, Japan). After blocking, the membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the indicated primary Abs and for 1 h with the corresponding secondary horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Abs. Membranes were washed three times in TTBS for 5 min after each incubation step. Visualization was performed by using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Little Chalfont, Buckinghamshire, United Kingdom). For reprobing, membranes were stripped with a solution containing 2% SDS, 100 mM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 62.5 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8) for 30 min at 50°C.

For immunoprecipitations, lysates (500 µg in 500 µl of lysis buffer) were incubated with primary Ab at 4°C overnight, followed by a 2-h incubation with protein A/G-agarose at 4°C. Precipitates were washed five times with ice-cold lysis buffer, resuspended in loading buffer, and boiled for 5 min at 100°C. After centrifugation, the supernatants were subjected to immunoblotting as described above. The blot membranes were scanned with a GT-7600S flat scanner (Epson, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed with NIH image software.

Separation of Particulate and Cytosolic Fractions.
Separation of cytosolic and membrane fractions was performed as described previously (14) . Serum-starved subconfluent cells were incubated with EGF for the indicated time periods at 37°C. The cells were then washed with cold PBS and lysed by freeze-thawing in ice-cold lysis buffer containing 50 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM MgCl, 10 mM sodium fluoride, 1 mM DTT, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 10 µg/ml aprotinin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and centrifuged at 100,000 x g for 30 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected as the cytosolic fraction. Pellets were homogenized in the above-mentioned lysis buffer containing 2% Triton X-114 and centrifuged at 800 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The supernatant was collected and is referred to here as the membrane fraction. The protein concentrations in the cytosolic fraction and the membrane fraction were measured using a DC protein assay kit and adjusted to the same concentration with the lysis buffer, and then these fractions were subjected to immunoblotting. The blot membranes were scanned as described above.

Statistical Analysis.
The statistical significance of the differences between groups was calculated by applying Student’s two-tailed t test, and P < 0.05 was considered significant.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Effect of EGF on the in Vitro Invasiveness of Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells.
The possibility that EGF stimulates the invasiveness of human pancreatic cancer cells was studied in a Matrigel invasion assay in Transwell culture chambers. Cells were incubated for 16 h in the absence or presence of 0.01–1 nM EGF in the lower compartment of the culture chambers, and then the cells that passed through the Matrigel-coated membranes to the lower surface of the filters were counted. As shown in Fig. 1ACitation , the invasive capacity of PANC-1 cells was stimulated by EGF in a dose-dependent manner. During this incubation period, the number of PANC-1 cells increased approximately 10% in the presence of 1 nM EGF (data not shown).



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of EGF on pancreatic cancer cell invasion. A, dose dependence study of the effect of EGF. PANC-1 cells (1 x 105 cells/well) were added to the upper wells of a 24-Transwell chamber and incubated in the presence or absence of EGF in the lower compartment. B, effect of blocking the MAPK, PI3K, and tyrosine phosphorylation signal transduction pathways on cancer cell invasion. PANC-1 cells were pretreated for 30 min with DMSO (Control), PD 98059 (10 µM), LY 294002 (2 µM), wortmannin (0.5 µM), or genistein (10 µg/ml) before the addition of the cell suspension to the filter. The cells (1 x 105 cells/well) were added to the upper compartment, and EGF (1 nM) was added to the lower compartment. C, effect of blocking the Rho signal transduction pathway on cancer cell invasion. PANC-1 cells were incubated in medium containing 10% FBS and digitonin (25 µM) in the absence or presence of C3 (5 µg/ml) for 24 h. After the cells were washed twice with PBS, 1 x 105 cells/well were added to the upper compartment and incubated in the presence of EGF (1 nM) in the lower compartment. Migration across the Matrigel-coated polycarbonate membrane was assessed after 16 h. The number of cells in nine separate high-power microscopic fields (magnification, x400) was counted in triplicate wells. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE of three separate experiments in triplicate wells. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 versus control.

 
As a prelude to identifying the signaling mechanism(s) by which EGF stimulates invasion, we initially assessed the effects of inhibitors of MAPK (PD 98059) and PI3K (LY 294002 or wortmannin) on PANC-1 cell invasion stimulated by EGF. When cells were incubated for 16 h with 10 µM PD 98059 in the Transwell chamber, EGF-induced cancer cell invasion was not altered (Fig. 1B)Citation . In contrast, 2 µM LY 294002 or 0.5 µM wortmannin inhibited EGF-induced cancer cell invasion significantly (Fig. 1B)Citation . Genistein, an inhibitor of tyrosine phosphorylation, also inhibited the cancer cell invasion in response to EGF (Fig. 1B)Citation . None of the inhibitors altered the capacity of the cells to exclude trypan blue, indicating that under the experimental conditions used in the present study, the inhibitors did not injure the cells.

Because EGF is known to stimulate the small GTPase Rho (7) , the role of Rho in EGF-induced cancer cell invasion was tested by suppressing Rho function with C3 (a specific inhibitor of Rho). When PANC-1 cells were pretreated with 5 µg/ml C3 for 24 h in the presence of 10% FBS, EGF-induced cell invasion was suppressed to approximately 13% in comparison with cells not treated with C3 (Fig. 1C)Citation . These results indicate that Rho and PI3K are essential for EGF-induced cancer cell invasion.

Effects of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors on Cell Morphology and Cytoskeletal Organization.
Because HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors cause cell rounding by prevention of isoprenylation proteins important for cytoskeletal organization (25, 26, 27) , we first studied the effect of fluvastatin or lovastatin on the morphology of human pancreatic cancer cells. Typical shapes of PANC-1 cells are shown in Fig. 2Citation . Untreated PANC-1 cells were flat and well spread, but exposure of the cells to 15 µM fluvastatin resulted in cell retraction from the substratum, rounding up, and loss of contacts between neighboring cells. The same morphological changes were observed when lovastatin was used instead of fluvastatin. After a 24-h incubation of PANC-1 cells with 15 µM fluvastatin or lovastatin, cell growth was not altered significantly, and these morphological changes were reversed 24 h after the removal of fluvastatin (data not shown).



View larger version (139K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Effect of fluvastatin on PANC-1 cell morphology. Cells were incubated for 24 h in medium containing 0.1% BSA with 15 µM fluvastatin in the absence or presence of GGOL or FOL and observed by phase-contrast microscopy. A, untreated cells; B, cells treated with fluvastatin only; C, cells treated with fluvastatin and 10 µM GGOL; D, cells treated with fluvastatin and 10 µM FOL.

 
The role of geranylgeranylated or farnesylated proteins was studied by treating cells with GGOL or FOL in the presence of fluvastatin. The cells treated with fluvastatin in the presence of GGOL (10 µM) were well spread, like the control cells (Fig. 2C)Citation , but the cells treated with fluvastatin in the presence of 10 µM FOL remained spindle-shaped (Fig. 2D)Citation . These results indicate that geranylgeranylation of Rho is required for the well-spread morphology of PANC-1 cells.

The exposure of cells to growth factors has been shown to cause cytoskeletal reorganization and altered cell morphology, which have accordingly been implicated in the enhancement of cell migration and invasion (6 , 7 , 9) . Therefore, we investigated whether EGF stimulation results in actin cytoskeletal rearrangements in PANC-1 cells. As shown in Fig. 3Citation , serum-starved cells displayed low levels of F-actin as judged by phalloidin staining (Fig. 3A)Citation . The treatment of cancer cells with 1 nM EGF resulted in a dramatic increase in polymerized cortical actin (Fig. 3B)Citation . In contrast, cells preincubated with 15 µM fluvastatin for 24 h were round, and EGF-induced cortical actin polymerization was greatly reduced (Fig. 3C)Citation . The effect of fluvastatin on EGF-induced actin stress fiber assembly was reversed by the addition of GGOL (data not shown).



View larger version (48K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Effect of fluvastatin on actin cytoskeletal redistribution after EGF stimulation. PANC-1 cells were incubated for 24 h in medium containing 0.1% BSA in the absence or presence of fluvastatin (15 µM). After further incubation with EGF (1 nM) for 15 min, cells were stained with rhodamine-phalloidin to visualize actin stress fibers. A, untreated cells; B, cells treated with EGF; C, cells treated with fluvastatin and EGF.

 
Inhibitory Effects of HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitors on EGF-induced Cell Invasion.
The effect of HMG-CoA inhibitors on the in vitro invasiveness of EGF-stimulated cells was assessed using the Matrigel invasion assay. The migration of PANC-1 cells through the Matrigel-coated polycarbonate membrane was inhibited by the addition of fluvastatin or lovastatin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4A)Citation . Half-maximal inhibition was estimated to occur at about 3 µM fluvastatin or lovastatin, and approximately 70% inhibition was observed with 15 µM fluvastatin or lovastatin (Fig. 4A)Citation . The inhibitory effect of fluvastatin or lovastatin on EGF-induced PANC-1 cell invasion was completely reversed 24 h after removal of the inhibitors. The presence of 15 µM fluvastatin or lovastatin did not reduce PANC-1 cell attachment to Matrigel-coated dishes 1 h after seeding and did not affect the cell growth during the 16-h incubation period (data not shown). These results suggest that fluvastatin and lovastatin inhibit the migration of the cells toward the chemoattractant EGF located in the lower chamber.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on EGF-induced invasion of PANC-1 cells. A, dose dependence study of the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Cells were resuspended in serum-free medium containing 0.1% BSA with the indicated concentration of fluvastatin ({square}) or lovastatin ({blacksquare}). B, the effects of FOL and GGOL on fluvastatin-treated cells. Cells were resuspended in serum-free medium containing 0.1% BSA with 15 µM fluvastatin in the absence or presence of 10 µM FOL or 10 µM GGOL. The cells (1 x 105 cells/well) were added to the upper compartment, and the lower compartment was immediately filled with the same medium containing 1 nM EGF. In vitro invasion was assessed after 16 h. Data are expressed as the mean ± SE of three separate experiments in triplicate wells. *, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01 versus control with EGF stimulation. {dagger}, P < 0.01 versus fluvastatin-treated cells with EGF stimulation.

 
The role of geranylgeranylated or farnesylated proteins was studied by treating cells with GGOL or FOL. Whereas neither GGOL nor FOL induced control cell invasion without EGF stimulation, the inhibitory effect of fluvastatin on EGF-induced PANC-1 cell invasion was reversed by the addition of GGOL, but not by the addition of FOL (Fig. 4B)Citation .

To examine the cell type specificity of inhibition, the effect of fluvastatin on the invasiveness of a variety of cancer cells was studied. Fluvastatin inhibited the EGF-induced invasiveness of ASPC-1 and MIAPaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer cells and WiDr human colon cancer cells (Table 1)Citation . Furthermore, fluvastatin inhibited the serum-induced invasiveness of PSN-1 human pancreatic cancer cells and MCF-7 human breast cancer cells, indicating that the inhibitory effect of fluvastatin was not specific to PANC-1 cells.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Effect of fluvastatin on cancer cell invasion

 
Inhibitory Effect of Fluvastatin on EGF-induced Translocation of RhoA from the Cytosol to the Membrane Fraction.
Because EGFR tyrosine kinase activity has been shown to be involved in cell motility (28) , we sought to determine whether fluvastatin would inhibit tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR and c-erbB-2. PANC-1 cells were preincubated for 24 h with or without fluvastatin and stimulated with EGF, and cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR Ab or anti-c-erbB-2 Ab, followed by immunoblotting with antiphosphotyrosine Ab. As shown in Fig. 5Citation , pretreatment with fluvastatin did not attenuate the EGF-stimulated phosphorylation of either receptor.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Western blot analysis of the effect of fluvastatin on EGF-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR and c-erbB-2. PANC-1 cells were incubated for 24 h in medium containing 0.1% BSA with the indicated concentration of fluvastatin and then incubated for 5 min in the absence (-) or presence (+) of EGF (1 nM). After cell lysis, lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-EGFR Ab (A) or anti-c-erbB-2 Ab (B), followed by immunoblotting with 4G10 antiphosphotyrosine Ab (top panels). The membrane was stripped and reprobed with an anti-EGFR Ab (A) or anti-c-erbB-2 Ab (B) to demonstrate specificity and equal loading (bottom panels).

 
Because RhoA must be targeted to the plasma membrane for its activation (14 , 15) , we first examined the effect of fluvastatin on the translocation of RhoA protein from the cytosol to the membrane fraction in PANC-1 cells. In serum-starved PANC-1 cells, approximately 26% of the RhoA protein was present in the membrane fraction without any stimulation. The incubation of these cells with 15 µM fluvastatin caused RhoA to decrease in the membrane fraction and to accumulate in the cytosolic fraction in a time-dependent manner (Fig. 6A)Citation . Translocation of RhoA from the membrane to the cytosol became evident after 60 min of fluvastatin treatment. To determine whether the inhibition of cell invasion by fluvastatin is mediated by suppression of RhoA activation, we examined the effect of fluvastatin on the translocation of RhoA after stimulation with EGF. Western blot analysis showed that stimulation of PANC-1 cells with 1 nM EGF for 30 min resulted in a 1.7-fold increase in the amount of RhoA translocated from the cytosol to the membrane fraction, as compared with control (Fig. 6, B and C)Citation . To confirm RhoA localization in PANC-1 cells under culture conditions, cells were immunostained with a RhoA-specific Ab. In control cells, RhoA immunostaining was confined largely to the cytosol (Fig. 7A)Citation . In contrast, the stimulation of PANC-1 cells with EGF resulted in the translocation of RhoA to the membrane at the edges of lamellae (Fig. 7B)Citation . The translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction in response to EGF was markedly blocked by pretreatment with fluvastatin in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 6, B and CCitation , and Fig. 7DCitation ). The effect of fluvastatin on EGF-induced translocation of RhoA was blocked by the addition of GGOL, but not by the addition of FOL (Fig. 6, B and CCitation , and Fig. 7, E and FCitation ).



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction. A, time course of the effect of fluvastatin on the RhoA translocation. PANC-1 cells were incubated in medium containing 0.1% BSA with fluvastatin (15 µM) for the indicated time periods. B, effect of fluvastatin on EGF-induced translocation of RhoA. Cells were incubated for 120 min in medium containing 0.1% BSA with fluvaststin in the absence or presence of 10 µM FOL or 10 µM GGOL and then incubated for 30 min in the absence (top) or presence (bottom) of EGF (1 nM). Proteins were extracted and separated into cytosolic (c) and membrane (m) fractions, and then RhoA was detected by immunoblotting as described in "Materials and Methods." C, relative RhoA protein concentration in the membrane fraction (percentage of total). Columns, means of three independent experiments; bars, SD. *, P < 0.05 versus control without EGF stimulation; {dagger}, P < 0.05 versus control with EGF stimulation.

 


View larger version (110K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Effect of fluvastatin on RhoA localization in PANC-1 cells. Cells were incubated for 120 min in medium containing 0.1% BSA without (A and B) or with (C–F) 15 µM fluvaststin in the absence (C and D) or presence of 10 µM FOL (E) or 10 µM GGOL (F). After further incubation with EGF (1 nM) for 15 min (B and D–F), cells were stained for RhoA using indirect immunofluorescence as described in "Materials and Methods."

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cancer cells require more cholesterol than normal cells (29 , 30) . This requirement seems to be satisfied by a higher HMG-CoA reductase activity or a higher activity of low density lipoprotein receptor. HMG-CoA reductase activity was shown to be higher in colorectal cancer not expressing low density lipoprotein receptor, and these features are associated with decreased patient survival (31 , 32) . These data suggest the involvement of high HMG-CoA reductase activity and high levels of mevalonate-derived metabolites, such as isoprenoid compounds, in the biological aggressiveness of cancer.

All HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors in clinical use (lovastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin, and fluvastatin) are reversible inhibitors that interfere with catalysis of the rate-limiting step in cholesterol biosynthesis. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors, including simvastatin and lovastatin, prevent cell proliferation by inducing a block of the cell cycle in G1 phase (33, 34, 35) . Pravastatin was demonstrated to inhibit the growth of AH130 hepatoma cells and to improve the survival of rats bearing the ascites-form tumor (36) . Although lovastatin has been studied extensively as a possible chemotherapeutic agent for reduction of cancer cell invasion and metastasis (20, 21, 22, 23) , the exact mechanism(s) of the inhibitory effects of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors on cancer cell invasion has not been clarified. Furthermore, the effect of fluvastatin, the first entirely synthetic HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor (37) , on cancer cell invasion has not hitherto been determined. Here we show for the first time that fluvastatin inhibited the translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane and the in vitro invasion of human pancreatic cancer cells in response to EGF. The cancer cell invasion was similarly inhibited by lovastatin.

We found that fluvastatin inhibited EGF-induced translocation of RhoA and cancer cell invasion by preventing geranylgeranylation of RhoA. This is supported by the following observations: (a) C3, a specific inhibitor of Rho, inhibited EGF-stimulated invasion (Fig. 1C)Citation ; (b) stimulation of PANC-1 cells with EGF induced translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction (Figs. 6BCitation and 7BCitation ) and actin stress fiber assembly (Fig. 3B)Citation ; (c) pretreatment of cells with fluvastatin inhibited the EGF-stimulated translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction (Figs. 6BCitation and 7DCitation ) and actin stress fiber assembly (Fig. 3C)Citation ; (d) the inhibitory effect of fluvastatin on the induction of RhoA translocation and cell invasiveness by EGF was reversed by the addition of GGOL, but not by the addition of FOL (Figs. 4B)Citation , 6BCitation , and 7, E and FCitation .

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are targeted to the liver and have elimination half-lives of 1.2–3 h (37) . Despite their short systemic exposure times, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors have been demonstrated to inhibit lung metastasis (20 , 22) and lymph node metastasis (21) . In the present study, the translocation of RhoA from the membrane to the cytosol fraction in PANC-1 cells became evident after 1 h of fluvastatin treatment (Fig. 6A)Citation , and EGF-induced translocation of RhoA from the cytosol to the membrane fraction was blocked by the pretreatment of cells for 2 h with fluvastatin (Fig. 6B)Citation . Koch et al. (26) demonstrated that the translocation of ADP-ribosylated Rho protein from the membrane to the cytosol fraction in NIH 3T3 cells was observed after 6 h of treatment with lovastatin. These data suggest that membrane binding of Rho protein is inhibited within several hours when geranylgeranylation of Rho protein is prevented by treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors.

On the other hand, farnesylated Ras proteins are associated with cell proliferation, and farnesyltransferase inhibitors suppress Ras-mediated tumor growth (38) . The incubation of PANC-1 cells with 1 nM EGF for 24 h caused an approximately 10% increase in cell growth (data not shown). Although MAPK inhibitor PD 98059 (10 µM) completely suppressed the stimulation of cell growth by EGF, the induction of cell invasiveness by EGF was not altered by 10 µM PD 98059 (Fig. 1B)Citation . Consistent with this, Chen et al. (28) demonstrated that induction of mitogenesis and cell motility by EGF is mediated through different pathways. The incubation of PANC-1 cells for 24 h with 15 µM fluvastatin did not significantly alter basal cell growth (data not shown). FOL could not prevent the effect of fluvastatin on EGF-induced cell invasion (Fig. 4B)Citation . These results indicate that the inhibition of cell invasion by fluvastatin is independent of farnesylated proteins and that it is not the result of growth inhibition by fluvastatin.

Tyrosine kinase receptors for growth factors such as insulin and platelet-derived growth factor have been implicated in the regulation of HMG-CoA reductase (39 , 40) . Recent studies have shown that HMG-CoA reductase activity is modulated by EGF and tyrosine kinase in human breast cancer cells overexpressing c-erbB-2 (41 , 42) . We showed that fluvastatin did not attenuate the EGF-stimulated tyrosine phosphorylation of EGFR and c-erb-B-2 (Fig. 5)Citation . When PANC-1 cells were treated with genistein, an inhibitor of tyrosine phosphorylation, the enhancement of invasion in response to EGF was blocked (Fig. 1B)Citation . Under conditions in which tyrosine kinase receptors were active, but HMG-CoA reductase was not (treatment with EGF and fluvastatin), the addition of GGOL enhanced the invasive ability of cancer cells. However, GGOL alone did not induce the invasiveness of control cells without EGF stimulation (Fig. 4B)Citation . These findings suggest that, at least in our assay system, both activation of tyrosine kinase receptors and geranylgeranylation of RhoA are necessary for cancer cell invasion.

Growth factors mediate their biological effects by binding to and activating receptors with tyrosine kinase activity, leading to a series of molecular events that are ultimately manifested as biological responses (43 , 44) . Multiple receptor targets, including PI3K (45 , 46) , Src (47) , and phospholipase C{gamma} (45 , 48) , contribute to efficient signaling for growth factor-induced cell migration. We demonstrated that induction of cell invasion by EGF was inhibited by the PI3K inhibitors wortmannin and LY 294002 (Fig. 1B)Citation . Consistent with these results, Asslan et al. (42) demonstrated that EGF enhances HMG-CoA reductase activity through a PI3K pathway independent of the extracellular signal-regulated kinase/MAPK or c-Jun-NH2-terminal kinase/stress-activated protein kinase pathways. Furthermore, PI3K activity, which is localized in the membrane fraction, is decreased by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (49) . Together, these data suggest the involvement of PI3K activity in the tyrosine kinase receptor-RhoA invasion cascade via HMG-CoA reductase activity.

Our results highlight the importance of HMG-CoA reductase metabolism in cancer cell invasion in response to EGF and suggest that HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors affect EGF-induced translocation of RhoA and cancer cell invasion by preventing geranylgeranylation of RhoA. A significant inhibitory effect of fluvastatin or lovastatin on EGF-induced PANC-1 cell invasion was observed at a concentration of 1.5 µM, and half-maximal inhibition was estimated to occur at about 3 µM (Fig. 4A)Citation . Although the inhibitory fluvastatin concentration was higher than the peak plasma concentration of fluvastatin (0.1–1.5 µM) detected in clinical trials (34) , the inhibitory concentration of lovastatin was comparable to the plasma concentration of lovastatin (0.1–3.9 µM) measured in a Phase I study in patients with cancer (50) . HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are well absorbed, actively targeted to the liver, and safe for use in long-term treatment (37) . These data strongly suggest that these inhibitors have the potential to prevent pancreatic cancer cell invasion and liver metastasis at concentrations that might be relatively nontoxic to normal cells in comparison to most presently used anticancer agents.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by a Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Health and Welfare for the Second-Term Comprehensive 10-Year Strategy for Cancer Control, Japan. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Tumor Biochemistry, Osaka Medical Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases, 1-3-3 Nakamichi, Higashinari-ku, Osaka 537-8511, Japan. Phone: 81-6-6972-1181; Fax: 81-6-6972-7749; E-mail: kusama{at}mail.mc.pref.osaka.jp Back

3 The abbreviations used are: EGF, epidermal growth factor; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A; C3, Clostridium botulinum C3 exoenzyme; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3'-kinase; MAPK, mitogen-activated protein kinase; GGOL, all-trans-geranylgeraniol; FOL, all-trans-farnesol; FBS, fetal bovine serum; mAb, monoclonal antibody; Ab, antibody; TTBS, Tris-buffered saline containing 1% Tween 20. Back

Received 7/20/00. Accepted 4/17/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Gudjonsson B. Carcinoma of the pancreas: a critical analysis of costs, results of resections, and the need for standardized reporting. J. Am. Coll. Surg., 181: 483-503, 1995.[Medline]
  2. Parker S. L., Tong T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J. Clin., 65: 5-27, 1996.
  3. Korc M. Role of growth factors in pancreatic cancer. Surg. Oncol. Clin. N. Am., 7: 25-41, 1998.[Medline]
  4. Welsh J. B., Gill G. N., Rosenfeld M. G., Wells A. A negative feedback loop attenuates EGF-induced morphological changes. J. Cell Biol., 114: 533-543, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rijken P. J., Hage W. J., van Bergen en Henegouwen P. M. P., Verkleij A. J., Boonstra J. Epidermal growth factor induces rapid organization of the actin microfilament system in human A431 cells. J. Cell Sci., 100: 491-499, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Peppelenbosch M. P., Tertoolen L. G. J., Hage W. J., de Laat S. W. Epidermal growth factor-induced actin remodeling is regulated by 5-lipoxygenase and cyclooxygenase products. Cell, 74: 565-575, 1993.[Medline]
  7. Ridley A. J., Hall A. The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. Cell, 70: 389-399, 1992.[Medline]
  8. Nobes C. D., Hall A. Rho, Rac, and Cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. Cell, 81: 53-62, 1995.[Medline]
  9. Hall A. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. Science (Wash. DC), 279: 509-514, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Keely P. J., Westwick J. K., Whitehead I. P., Der C. J., Parise L. V. Cdc42 and rac1 induce integrin-mediated cell motility and invasiveness through PI(3)K. Nature (Lond.), 390: 632-636, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Clark E., King W. G., Brugge J. S., Symons M., Hynes R. O. Integrin-mediated signals regulated by members of the Rho family of GTPases. J. Cell Biol., 142: 573-586, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Imamura F., Shinkai K., Mukai M., Yoshioka K., Komagome R., Iwasaki T., Akedo H. Rho-mediated protein tyrosine phosphorylation in lysophosphatidic acid induced tumor cell invasion. Int. J. Cancer, 65: 627-632, 1996.[Medline]
  13. Yoshioka K., Matsumura F., Akedo H., Itoh K. Small GTP-binding protein Rho stimulates the actomyosin system, leading to invasion of tumor cells. J. Biol. Chem., 273: 5146-5154, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Yoshioka K., Nakamori S., Itoh K. Overexpression of small GTP-binding protein RhoA promotes invasion of tumor cells. Cancer Res., 59: 2004-2010, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. O’Connor K. L., Nguyen B-K., Mercurio A. M. RhoA function in lamellae formation and migration is regulated by the {alpha}6ß4 integrin and cAMP metabolism. J. Cell Biol., 148: 253-258, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Grunler J., Ericsson J., Dallner G. Branch-point reactions in the biosynthesis of cholesterol, dolichol, ubiquinone and prenylated proteins. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 1212: 259-277, 1994.[Medline]
  17. Goldstein J. L., Brown M. S. Regulation of the mevalonate pathway. Nature (Lond.), 343: 425-430, 1990.[Medline]
  18. Bourne H. R., Sanders D. A., McCormick F. The GTPase superfamily: a conserved switch for diverse cell functions. Nature (Lond.), 348: 125-132, 1990.[Medline]
  19. Sumi S., Beauchamp R. D., Townsend C. M., Uchida T., Murakami M., Rajaraman S., Ishizuka J., Thompson J. C. Inhibition of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell growth by lovastatin. Gastroenterology, 103: 982-989, 1992.[Medline]
  20. Alonso D. F., Farina H. G., Skilton G., Gabri M. R., De Lorenzo M. S., Gomez D. E. Reduction of mouse mammary tumor formation and metastasis by lovastatin, an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway of cholesterol synthesis. Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 50: 83-93, 1998.[Medline]
  21. Matar P., Rozados V. R., Binda M. M., Roggero E. A., Bonfil R. D., Scharovsky O. G. Inhibitory effect of lovastatin on spontaneous metastasis derived from a rat lymphoma. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 17: 19-25, 1999.[Medline]
  22. Jani J. P., Specht S., Stemmler N., Blanock K., Singh S. V., Gupta V., Katoh A. Metastasis of B16F10 mouse melanoma inhibited by lovastatin, an inhibitor of cholesterol biosynthesis. Invasion Metastasis, 13: 314-324, 1993.[Medline]
  23. Mehta N., Hordies J., Sykes D., Doerr R. J., Cohen S. A. Low density lipoproteins and lovastatin modulate the organ-specific transendothelial migration of primary and metastatic human colon adenocarcinoma cell lines in vitro. Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 16: 587-594, 1998.[Medline]
  24. Albini A., Iwamoto Y., Kleinman H. K., Martin G. R., Aaronson J. M., Kozlowski J. M., McEwan R. N. A rapid in vitro assay for quantitating the invasive potential of tumor cells. Cancer Res., 47: 3239-3245, 1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Fenton R. G., Kung H-F., Longo D. L., Smith M. R. Regulation of intracellular actin polymerization by prenylated cellular proteins. J. Cell Biol., 117: 347-356, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Koch G., Benz C., Schmidt G., Olenik C., Aktories K. Role of rho protein in lovastatin-induced breakdown of actin cytoskeleton. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 283: 901-909, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Ghosh P. M., Ghosh-Choudhury N., Moyer M. L., Mott G. E., Thomas C. A., Foster B. A., Greengerg N. M., Kreisberg J. I. Role of RhoA activation in the growth and morphology of a murine prostate tumor cell line. Oncogene, 18: 4120-4130, 1999.[Medline]
  28. Chen P., Gupta K., Wells A. Cell movement elicited by epidermal growth factor receptor requires kinase and autophosphorylation but is separable from mitogenesis. J. Cell Biol., 124: 547-555, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Rudling M. J., Angelin B., Peterson C. O., Collins V. P. Low density lipoprotein receptor activity in human intracranial tumors and its relation to the cholesterol requirement. Cancer Res., 50: 483-487, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Kawata S., Takaishi K., Nagase T., Ito N., Matsuda Y., Tamura S., Matsuzawa Y., Tarui S. Increase in the active form of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase in human hepatocellular carcinoma: possible mechanism for alteration of cholesterol biosynthesis. Cancer Res., 50: 3270-3273, 1990.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Caruso M. G., Osella A. R., Notarnicola M., Berloco P., Leo S., Bonfiglio C., Di Leo A. Prognostic value of low density lipoprotein receptor expression in colorectal carcinoma. Oncol. Rep., 5: 927-930, 1998.[Medline]
  32. Caruso M. G., Notarnicola M., Santillo M., Cavallini A., Di Leo A. Enhanced 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase in human colorectal cancer not expressing low density lipoprotein receptor. Anticancer Res., 19: 451-454, 1999.[Medline]
  33. Jakobisiak M., Bruno S., Skierski J. S., Darzynkiewicz Z. Cell cycle-specific effects of lovastatin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 88: 3628-3632, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Keyomarsi K., Sandoval L., Band V., Pardee A. B. Synchronization of tumor and normal cells from G1 to multiple cell cycle by lovastatin. Cancer Res., 51: 3602-3609, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Addeo R., Altucci L., Battista T., Bonapace I. M., Cancemi M., Cicatiello L., Germano D., Pacilio C., Salzano S., Bresciani F., Weisz A. Stimulation of human breast cancer MCF-7 cells with estrogen prevents cell cycle arrest by HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 220: 864-870, 1996.[Medline]
  36. Kawata S., Kakimoto H., Ishiguro H., Yamasaki E., Inui Y., Matsuzawa Y. Effect of pravastatin, a potent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitor, on survival of AH130 hepatoma-bearing rats. Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 83: 1120-1123, 1992.[Medline]
  37. Plosker G. L., Wagstaff A. J. Fluvastatin: a review of its pharmacology and use in the management of hypercholesterolaemia. Drugs, 51: 433-459, 1996.[Medline]
  38. Kohl N. E., Mosser S. D., deSolms S. J., Giuliani E. A., Pompliano D. L., Graham S. L., Smith R. L., Scolnick E. M., Oliff A., Gibbs J. B. Selective inhibition of ras-dependent transformation by a farnesyltransferase inhibitor. Science (Wash. DC), 260: 1934-1937, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  39. Ness G. C., Zhao Z., Wiggins L. Insulin and glucagon modulate hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase activity by affecting immunoreactive protein levels. J. Biol. Chem., 269: 29168-29172, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  40. Carlberg M., Larsson O. Stimulatory effect of PDGF on HMG-CoA reductase activity and N-linked glycosylation contributes to increased expression of IGF-1 receptors in human fibroblasts. Exp. Cell Res., 223: 142-148, 1996.[Medline]
  41. Asslan R., Pradines A., Favre G., Le Gaillard F. Tyrosine kinase-dependent modulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase in human breast adenocarcinoma SKBR-3 cells. Biochem. J., 330: 241-246, 1998.
  42. Asslan R., Pradines A., Pratx C., Allal C., Favre G., Le Gaillard F. Epidermal growth factor stimulates 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase expression via the ErbB-2 pathway in human breast adenocarcinoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 260: 699-706, 1999.[Medline]
  43. Ullrich A., Schlessinger J. Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell, 61: 203-212, 1990.[Medline]
  44. Pawson T. Protein modules and signaling networks. Nature (Lond.), 373: 573-580, 1995.[Medline]
  45. Kundra V., Escobedo J. A., Kazlauskas A., Kim H. K., Rhee S. G., Williams L. T., Zetter B. R. Regulation of chemotaxis by the platelet-derived growth factor receptor-ß. Nature (Lond.), 367: 474-476, 1994.[Medline]
  46. Kotani K., Yonezawa K., Hara K., Ueda H., Kitamura Y., Sakaue H., Ando A., Chavanieu A., Calas B., Grigorescu F., Nishiyama M., Waterfield M. D., Kasuga M. Involvement of phosphoinositide 3-kinase in insulin- or IGF-1-induced membrane ruffling. EMBO J., 13: 2313-2321, 1994.[Medline]
  47. Brunton V. G., Ozanne B. W., Paraskeva C., Frame M. C. A role for epidermal growth factor receptor, c-Src and focal adhesion kinase in an in vitro model for the progression of colon cancer. Oncogene, 14: 283-293, 1997.[Medline]
  48. Chen P., Xie H., Sekar M. C., Gupta K., Wells A. Epidermal growth factor receptor-mediated cell motility: phospholipase C activity is required, but mitogen-activated protein kinase activity is not sufficient for induced cell movement. J. Cell Biol., 127: 847-857, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  49. Nakagawa H., Mutoh T., Kumano T., Kuriyama M. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor-induced L6 myoblast cell death: involvement of the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase pathway. FEBS Lett., 438: 289-292, 1998.[Medline]
  50. Thibault A., Samid D., Tompkins A. C., Figg W. D., Cooper M. R., Hohl R. J., Trepel J., Liang B., Patronas N., Venzon D. J., Reed E., Myers C. E. Phase I study of lovastatin, an inhibitor of the mevalonate pathway, in patients with cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., 2: 483-491, 1996.[Abstract]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. J. Hamilton, K. C. Goldberg, E. A. Platz, and S. J. Freedland
The Influence of Statin Medications on Prostate-specific Antigen Levels
J Natl Cancer Inst, November 5, 2008; 100(21): 1511 - 1518.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
J. Woodard, A. Sassano, N. Hay, and L. C. Platanias
Statin-Dependent Suppression of the Akt/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Signaling Cascade and Programmed Cell Death 4 Up-Regulation in Renal Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., July 15, 2008; 14(14): 4640 - 4649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
W. R. Farwell, R. E. Scranton, E. V. Lawler, R. A. Lew, M. T. Brophy, L. D. Fiore, and J. M. Gaziano
The Association Between Statins and Cancer Incidence in a Veterans Population
J Natl Cancer Inst, January 16, 2008; 100(2): 134 - 139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Kotamraju, C. L. Willams, and B. Kalyanaraman
Statin-Induced Breast Cancer Cell Death: Role of Inducible Nitric Oxide and Arginase-Dependent Pathways
Cancer Res., August 1, 2007; 67(15): 7386 - 7394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
V. Khurana, H. R. Bejjanki, G. Caldito, and M. W. Owens
Statins Reduce the Risk of Lung Cancer in Humans: A Large Case-Control Study of US Veterans
Chest, May 1, 2007; 131(5): 1282 - 1288.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. S. Ahn, G. Sethi, and B. B. Aggarwal
Simvastatin Potentiates TNF-{alpha}-Induced Apoptosis through the Down-Regulation of NF-{kappa}B-Dependent Antiapoptotic Gene Products: Role of I{kappa}B{alpha} Kinase and TGF-beta-Activated Kinase-1
J. Immunol., February 15, 2007; 178(4): 2507 - 2516.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
H. Liu, D. C. Radisky, C. M. Nelson, H. Zhang, J. E. Fata, R. A. Roth, and M. J. Bissell
Mechanism of Akt1 inhibition of breast cancer cell invasion reveals a protumorigenic role for TSC2.
PNAS, March 14, 2006; 103(11): 4134 - 4139.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
K. Hindler, C. S. Cleeland, E. Rivera, and C. D. Collard
The Role of Statins in Cancer Therapy.
Oncologist, January 1, 2006; 11(3): 306 - 315.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
C. Pioche-Durieu, C. Keryer, S. Souquere, J. Bosq, W. Faigle, D. Loew, M. Hirashima, N. Nishi, J. Middeldorp, and P. Busson
In Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells, Epstein-Barr Virus LMP1 Interacts with Galectin 9 in Membrane Raft Elements Resistant to Simvastatin
J. Virol., November 1, 2005; 79(21): 13326 - 13337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
M. Mukai, T. Kusama, Y. Hamanaka, T. Koga, H. Endo, M. Tatsuta, and M. Inoue
Cross Talk between Apoptosis and Invasion Signaling in Cancer Cells through Caspase-3 Activation
Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9121 - 9125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
W-B Zhong, Y-C Liang, C-Y Wang, T-C Chang, and W-S Lee
Lovastatin suppresses invasiveness of anaplastic thyroid cancer cells by inhibiting Rho geranylgeranylation and RhoA/ROCK signaling
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2005; 12(3): 615 - 629.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
A. Horiguchi, M. Sumitomo, J. Asakuma, T. Asano, T. Asano, and M. Hayakawa
3-Hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A Reductase Inhibitor, Fluvastatin, as a Novel Agent for Prophylaxis of Renal Cancer Metastasis
Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2004; 10(24): 8648 - 8655.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Goldshmit, C. E. Walters, H. J. Scott, C. J. Greenhalgh, and A. M. Turnley
SOCS2 Induces Neurite Outgrowth by Regulation of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Activation
J. Biol. Chem., April 16, 2004; 279(16): 16349 - 16355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
O. Rey, J. Yuan, S. H. Young, and E. Rozengurt
Protein Kinase C{nu}/Protein Kinase D3 Nuclear Localization, Catalytic Activation, and Intracellular Redistribution in Response to G Protein-coupled Receptor Agonists
J. Biol. Chem., June 20, 2003; 278(26): 23773 - 23785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Guha, J. A. Lunn, C. Santiskulvong, and E. Rozengurt
Neurotensin Stimulates Protein Kinase C-dependent Mitogenic Signaling in Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cell Line PANC-1
Cancer Res., May 15, 2003; 63(10): 2379 - 2387.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
N. M. Rubenstein, Y. Guan, P. L. Woo, and G. L. Firestone
Glucocorticoid Down-regulation of RhoA Is Required for the Steroid-induced Organization of the Junctional Complex and Tight Junction Formation in Rat Mammary Epithelial Tumor Cells
J. Biol. Chem., March 14, 2003; 278(12): 10353 - 10360.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
K. K. W. Chan, A. M. Oza, and L. L. Siu
The Statins as Anticancer Agents
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2003; 9(1): 10 - 19.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Sawada, K.-i. Morishige, M. Tahara, R. Kawagishi, Y. Ikebuchi, K. Tasaka, and Y. Murata
Alendronate Inhibits Lysophosphatidic Acid-induced Migration of Human Ovarian Cancer Cells by Attenuating the Activation of Rho
Cancer Res., November 1, 2002; 62(21): 6015 - 6020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Guha, O. Rey, and E. Rozengurt
Neurotensin Induces Protein Kinase C-dependent Protein Kinase D Activation and DNA Synthesis in Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cell Line PANC-1
Cancer Res., March 1, 2002; 62(6): 1632 - 1640.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
K. L. O'Connor and A. M. Mercurio
Protein Kinase A Regulates Rac and Is Required for the Growth Factor-stimulated Migration of Carcinoma Cells
J. Biol. Chem., December 14, 2001; 276(51): 47895 - 47900.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kusama, T.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online