| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Endocrinology |
Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition [C. D. A., K. F. A., Y. H. J., S. M. V., W. G. H.], and Division of Nutritional Sciences [C. D. A., W. G. H.], University of Illinois, Urbana, Illinois 61801
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Clinical and preclinical laboratory animal and in vitro studies have demonstrated the hormonal activity of dietary isoflavones. Our laboratory has examined the estrogenic activity of genistein. In vitro, when human estrogen-dependent breast cancer (MCF-7) cells were treated with increasing concentrations of genistein (110 µM), the cells expressed increased mRNA levels of pS2, an estrogen-responsive gene, in a dose-dependent manner. In vivo, 25-day-old ovariectomized, athymic mice consuming dietary genistein for 5 days had increased number and size of terminal end buds in the mammary gland when compared with control animals (5) . Not only do the isoflavones have estrogenic activity on various tissues when given in pure form but also when consumed in products such as soy protein isolate. In humans, Petrakis et al. (6) demonstrated that consumption of soy protein isolate had stimulatory effects on the breast tissue of premenopausal women. They found that duct fluid aspirates contained greater numbers of hyperplastic epithelial cells in women consuming soy protein isolate. Nipple aspirate apolipoprotein D and pS2 expression has also been shown to be elevated in women consuming 60 g of soy in the form of ground, textured vegetable protein for as little as 2 weeks (7) . These data collected from both laboratory animals and humans demonstrate the estrogenic activity of the isoflavones whether they are taken as a pure compound or consumed in soy protein isolate containing isoflavones.
The role that isoflavones play in breast cancer is unclear. Some reports indicate that exposure to genistein is preventative in the development of breast cancer (8, 9, 10)
, whereas others show that genistein stimulates the growth of existing estrogen-dependent tumors (5)
. Studies published over the last 5 years have demonstrated that exposure to dietary genistein before puberty reduces the number of chemically induced mammary tumors formed in female Sprague Dawley rats. The authors suggest protection against the development of breast cancer tumors is attributable to the estrogenic effects of genistein that causes increased cellular differentiation in mammary gland cells of prepubertal animals. A differentiated cell undergoes less proliferation and therefore is less likely to progress through the cancer process (8, 9, 10)
. If prepubertal exposure to genistein results in earlier differentiation of the mammary gland, then the assumption can be made that earlier differentiation would be protective against chemically induced mammary tumors. Cohen et al. (11)
found that continual feeding of soy protein isolate (containing 1.67 mg total isoflavones per g isolate) postpubertally for 18 weeks after chemical induction of mammary tumors in rats had no detectable effect on the development of these tumors. Our research has focused on the effect dietary genistein has on the growth of existing estrogen-dependent (MCF-7) tumors in animals with low circulating E24
concentrations. We have demonstrated that genistein fed at 750 ppm stimulates the growth of MCF-7 cells implanted into athymic mice. Mice consuming 750 ppm dose of genistein have a total plasma genistein concentration of
2 µM (5)
. This is a relevant dietary dosage because women who consume varying amounts of isoflavones from soy milk have plasma genistein levels of 0.8-2.2 µM (12)
. In vitro genistein has been shown to stimulate the growth of MCF-7 cells at concentrations as low as 200 nM (2
, 5)
. Whereas these data demonstrate genistein can stimulate the growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer tumors, it has not yet been determined if soy protein isolate, which contains a complex mixture of phytochemicals, can exhibit similar effects on growth of estrogen-dependent tumors.
The study presented here was designed to evaluate the effects of dietary soy protein isolates containing varying concentrations of genistein: (a) on the growth of MCF-7 tumors in athymic mice; (b) on cellular proliferation of estrogen-dependent tumors in ovariectomized athymic mice; and (c) on expression of the estrogen-responsive gene, pS2, in response to dietary exposure to soy protein isolates with varying concentrations of genistein.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
40 mm2. At this point, animals were placed into eight treatment groups (seven animals/group). The treatment groups were: (a) positive control; (b) negative control; (c) dietary soy protein isolate providing 15 ppm genistein; (d) dietary soy protein isolate providing 150 ppm genistein; (e) dietary soy protein isolate providing 300 ppm genistein; (f) dietary genistein in casein-based diet at 15 ppm; (g) 150 ppm; and (h) 300 ppm. The E2 pellet was removed from the negative control animals and from all of the mice on the various dietary treatments. The E2 pellet was also removed from the positive control group, but these animals were again implanted with an identical 2-mg E2 pellet. Negative and positive controls were given AIN 93G as a control diet. This diet provided protein from casein. The remaining animals were put on one of the six treatment diets. Tumor area and body weight were measured weekly. At the end of the study, tumors and plasma samples were collected for tissue analysis. We felt that weekly tumor area was the most critical outcome evaluated. Measurements were made over a total of 29 weeks after removal of E2 pellets. However, at the conclusion of the study, tumors from the negative control, low soy isolate, and low genistein groups were small, making it impossible to collect representative samples for mRNA and cell proliferation data. Therefore, to obtain these measurements for the negative control group, a second set of negative control animals were used. These animals were killed 11 weeks after removal of the E2 pellet when their tumors were at an average cross-sectional area of 25 mm2. We feel this was the most accurate method to obtain tissues from the negative control group that were regressing but still large enough to obtain data for mRNA and immunohistochemical analysis.
Diet Formulation.
AIN-93G semipurified diet was selected as a base diet for control animals as it has been established as meeting all of the nutritional requirements of mice (13)
. Soy oil was removed from all of the diets and corn oil added to eliminate any additional components of soy being added to the diets. Treatment animals were fed either soy isolate-containing diets or AIN-93G diet plus genistein. Three soy protein isolates with varying concentrations of genistein were used in this study. Each isolate was added at 20% of the diet as the sole source of protein in the AIN-93G diet. Both the casein-based diet and the soy-based diet provided
18% protein, but 2.2 g of methionine was added to each kilogram of soy isolate diet to meet the sulfur-containing amino acid requirements and as a result, all of the essential amino acid requirements of the mouse were met. The three soy protein isolates (Protein Technologies International, St. Louis, MO) were processed to contain varying amounts of genistein. There were no significant differences in amino acid content or proximate analysis among the isolates. Additionally, the isolates were very low in fiber and as such the lignin content was negligible. The majority of the isoflavones in the protein isolates were present as the aglycone form (
60%). The genistein contents were 0.075, 0.75, and 1.5 mg genistein (aglycone equivalents)/g of product. This resulted in the final concentrations of genistein in the three soy isolate diets to be 15, 150, and 300 mg genistein/kg diet respectively. To compare the genistein content from soy to pure genistein, it was added to the AIN-93G diet at equal concentrations to that found in the soy isolate diets and provided 15, 150, and 300 ppm genistein in a casein-based diet. The eight final treatment groups were: positive controls (2 mg E2 pellet); negative controls; low soy isolate [LSI (15 ppm genistein)]; medium soy isolate [MSI (150 ppm genistein)]; high soy isolate [HSI (300 ppm genistein)]; low genistein [LG (AIN-93G + 15 ppm genistein)]; medium genistein [MG (AIN-93G + 150 ppm genistein)]; and high genistein [HG (AIN- 93G + 300 ppm genistein)].
E2 Pellet Preparation.
MCF-7 cells will not produce tumors in ovariectomized mice unless they are supplemented with estrogen. Therefore, 1 week after delivery, animals were implanted with E2 pellets. E2 pellets were made containing 2 mg of E2 mixed with 18 mg of cholesterol as a carrier. A 20-mg mixture containing E2 and cholesterol was placed into a pellet mold and pressed into a compact pellet
4.5 mm in diameter and
2.5 mm in depth. Pellets were then placed s.c. in the interscapular region of mice (14)
.
Tumor Implantation.
MCF-7 cells were maintained in 100 mm x 20 mm plastic tissue culture plates in IMEM media (Biofluids) containing 10% fetal bovine serum, penicillin (100 units/ml) and streptomycin (100 units/ml). E2 (1.0 nM) was added in the media to keep the cell line estrogen-dependent. Cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2. Cells were grown to confluence, collected using trypsin-EDTA, and counted. Cells were suspended in matrigel matrix (Becton Dickinson) before being injected (15)
and then 40 µl of the cell suspension 1.5 x 105 cells were injected per site into each of the four flanks of the athymic mice.
Tumors were measured weekly and cross-sectional area was determined using the formula [length/2 x width/2 x
] (5
, 16)
. When tumors reached an average cross-sectional area of 40 mm2, animals were divided into treatment groups with each group normalized for tumor number, tumor size, and animal number. E2 pellets were removed from all of the animals, and the mice were then placed on the treatment diets. Positive control mice were reimplanted with a fresh pellet containing 2 mg of E. We then resumed measuring tumor areas weekly as described above.
Tissue/Tumor Collection.
At the completion of the study, mice were killed by cervical dislocation, and tumors were harvested. Tumors from each mouse were fixed in 10% formalin and embedded for immunohistochemical staining. Additional tumors from each mouse were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA isolation and analysis.
Analysis of Estrogen-responsive pS2 mRNA
RNA Preparation.
The mRNA was isolated using procedures routinely used in our laboratory (17)
. Briefly, frozen tumors (
200 mg) from liquid nitrogen were smashed and the coarse tumor powder was transferred into TRIZOL (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, NY) in a 15-ml tube and was homogenized using a Polytron-Aggregate (Luzern, Switzerland). Chloroform was added into a homogenized tumor sample, shaken vigorously, and then incubated for 10 min at 24°C. The reaction tube was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 15 min at 4°C. The upper portion was removed and transferred into a fresh tube. An equal volume of isopropyl alcohol was added, shaken, and incubated for 10 min at 24°C. The mixture was centrifuged at 12,000 x g for 10 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was washed with ice-cold 75% ethanol and centrifuged at 7,500 x g for 5 min at 4°C. The RNA pellet was air-dried then dissolved with RNase-free dH2O. RNA was stored at -80°C. RNA concentration was measured at 260 and 280 nm (1 A260 nm = 40 µg of single-stranded RNA/ml).
Northern Blot Analysis.
Expression of pS2 was used as a biomarker of estrogenic activity (18)
. For the detection of pS2 expression, 10 µg of RNA were separated on 1.2% formaldehyde denaturing agarose gels and transferred to a Magnacharge, Nylon, Transfer membrane (Osmonics, Westboro, MA). The RNA was UV cross-linked onto the membrane. The membrane was prehybridized in a formamide prehybridization solution containing denatured salmon sperm DNA for 3 h at 42°C. After 3-h prehybridization, the DNA probe was labeled using Random Primers DNA Labeling System (Life Technologies, Inc.). For the estrogen-responsive pS2 gene, a 25 ng of pS2 cDNA, or for the control, a 25 ng of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase cDNA probe was labeled with 50 µCi
-[ 32P]dCTP. The membrane was incubated with 32P-labeled probe overnight at 42°C. The membrane was washed twice with 5 ml of 0.2% SSC/0.1% SDS at 24°C for 5 min each, three times with 5 ml of 0.1% SSC/0.1% SDS at 68°C for 15 min each, and rinsed with 2% SSC. The membrane was exposed to X-ray film for 6 h, and hybridizing RNA molecules were detected by performing autoradiography. Film was analyzed using Collage (version 4.0) software (Image Dynamics Corp.) with Foto Analyst (Futodyne).
Tumor Cell Proliferation Immunohistochemistry
BrdUrd Analysis.
BrdUrd incorporation into cellular DNA was used as an indicator of cells that were actively proliferating (19)
. Four h before killing the animals each mouse was injected i.p. with 50 mg BrdUrd/kg body weight. Tumors were excised, skin and fat removed, and processed for tissue staining. Prepared sections were then stained for the presence of BrdUrd using a modified immunohistochemistry protocol (20)
. Briefly, slides were deparaffinized and hydrated by immersing in xylene twice for 12 min and immersing in a series of alcohol/water solutions for 5 min each. To block endogenous peroxidase, slides were immersed in 0.3% H2O2 for 20 min then washed with distilled water. Slides were then microwaved in a Pyrex dish in 18 mM citrate buffer at pH 6.0 for 20 min and cooled. Then slides were washed in PBS (pH 7.17.4) for 5 min, and tissue sections were rimmed with wax. 50-µl anti-BrdUrd primary antibody (Amersham) was added to slides and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in a humidity chamber. Slides were washed in PBS and 50 µl of diluted secondary antibody (Sigma Chemical Co.) was added to slides and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Slides were then washed in PBS. One drop of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine + Ni enhancer solution, freshly prepared, was added to each slide with a Pasteur pipette. Slides were then washed in water twice, in PBS, and counterstained with 20% hematoxylin for 1 min. The slides were then dehydrated by placing them in 80% alcohol for 5 min, 95% ethanol for 5 min, and 100% ethanol for 5 min followed by xylene four times for 5 min each. Slides were then coverslipped and analyzed by light microscope. Both positive and background stained cells were counted in a given area of tissue. The data were then presented as percentage of cells proliferating in a given area.
Statistical Analysis.
Tumor area data were analyzed using one-way or repeated-measures ANOVA according to the characteristics of the data set using the SAS program. pS2 gene expression data were analyzed using one-way treatment ANOVA. If the overall treatment F-ratio was significant (P < 0.05), the differences between treatment means were tested with Fishers least significant difference test.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
one-tenth that of the E2-treated mice. However, pS2 expression was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in animals consuming the medium and high soy protein isolates when compared with the negative control group. Levels of pS2 expression in tumors from animals that were consuming medium and high concentrations of genistein in the AIN93G diet were also significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the negative control group (Fig. 3)
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The estrogenic activity of isoflavones has been well documented in in vitro, in vivo, and clinical studies. Genistein can bind to the estrogen receptor
with an affinity 100-1000 times lower than E2 (21)
. Additionally, in ovariectomized Sprague Dawley rats, dietary genistein (750 ppm) enhanced lobular-alveolar mammary gland development, increased uterine weight, and at 750 ppm, increased pituitary prolactin secretion and serum prolactin levels. In the uterus, dietary genistein increased c-fos mRNA expression (21)
. In vitro studies showing an increase in the levels of the estrogen-responsive genes pS2 and c-fos when cells are treated with genistein, provide additional evidence of the estrogenic property of genistein (5
, 22)
. Clinical studies have also confirmed the preclinical studies evaluating the estrogenicity of genistein. Premenopausal women consuming textured vegetable protein containing 45 mg of isoflavones had prolonged menstrual cycles. Additionally, the follicular phase was extended by suppression of the normal surge of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone (23
, 24)
. These data in conjunction with the observations that dietary soy increases cell proliferation in human breast tissue (6)
and increases pS2 expression (7)
demonstrates biological (estrogenic) activity in humans.
Isoflavones are being marketed to postmenopausal women in both supplement form and in soy food products for the relief of the symptoms of menopause. It is, therefore, critical to understand what activities genistein may have in these women. Consideration must be given to how genistein may influence the endogenous levels of serum E2 in women consuming the compound. There is evidence suggesting diets high in soy have the ability to lower serum E2 concentrations (25
, 26)
. A study supporting this finding showed that normally cycling women consuming a soy diet containing
154 mg total isoflavones/day had a 25% reduction in circulating E2 (27)
. Contrarily, other studies in which premenopausal women have consumed soy have found no change in serum E2 concentrations (6
, 28)
, and one study showed increased serum E2 in women consuming soy (23)
. It is unclear how isoflavones in soy effect normal circulating E2 concentrations in premenopausal women. Postmenopausal women consuming a soy diet have been shown to have no change in serum circulating E2 levels (28)
. This finding in conjunction with reports that genistein acts estrogenically, and postmenopausal women naturally have low plasma concentrations of E2, suggest that in a postmenopausal woman, these weak estrogens may have significant estrogenic activity.
At concentrations above 10 µM genistein has been demonstrated to inhibit in vitro cell proliferation in a variety of cell types including estrogen-dependent (MCF-7) and estrogen-independent (MDA-468) human breast cancer cells (29) . Genistein has also been shown to inhibit activities of protein tyrosine kinase at concentrations >20 µM (30) . However, at levels as low as 200 nM, genistein stimulates the growth of MCF-7 cells in vitro (2 , 5) and in vivo at 1 µM (5) . In MCF-7 cells, at concentrations from 2090 µM genistein inhibited DNA synthesis, but stimulated DNA synthesis at concentrations of 0.110 µM (31) . In this study we demonstrated that dietary genistein consumed at 15 ppm, whether from soy protein or as a pure compound, does not stimulate growth that is significantly different from the negative control group lacking any form of estrogen exposure in regard to stimulation of MCF-7 tumor growth. These results suggest that there is a level of dietary genistein that will not lead to an increase in tumor growth. Additional investigation will be necessary to determine the concentration of this threshold dose.
Numerous studies have focused on the chemopreventative effects of genistein and demonstrate that if exposed to isoflavones before puberty a rat has a reduced risk of developing breast cancer when exposed to a chemical carcinogen (8, 9, 10) . It is reasonable then to assume a similar protective effect might be seen in women if they are exposed to isoflavones before puberty. Early exposure of women in Asia to isoflavones may explain in part why Asian women have a lower rate of breast cancer incidence when compared with American women. It is hypothesized that a high soy diet throughout life protects against development of breast cancer. This idea is supported by the fact that upon moving to the United States, Asian women have a similar breast cancer rate as that of American women after two generations, indicating early exposure is critical (32, 33, 34) . In evaluating the correlation between urinary phytoestrogen levels and breast cancer incidence in postmenopausal women, a recent report showed high urinary genistein excretion was weakly and nonsignificantly associated with a reduced breast cancer risk (35) . Another study shows no effect of soy consumption on the progression of chemically induced mammary tumors in the rat (11) . However, it is important to note that in this study animals were intact with normal circulating E2. Paradoxically, we have shown that, in ovariectomized mice transplanted with human estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells, genistein and now soy protein isolates containing genistein stimulated tumor growth (5) . Ovariectomized athymic mice implanted with MCF-7 cells are an appropriate model of postmenopausal women with estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Plasma levels of E2 in ovariectomized athymic mice are 2738 pg/ml compared with postmenopausal women 1040 pg/ml (36) . We believe the low endogenous estrogen environment created in this model by ovariectomizing the mice affords genistein the opportunity to be a significant source of estrogenicity in these animals and, hence, allows for the compound to stimulate the growth of these tumors. Therefore, if a postmenopausal woman with low endogenous E2 levels has an existing estrogen-dependent breast tumor it is also possible that consumption of dietary genistein from various food sources including soy protein isolate may produce sufficient plasma levels of genistein to result in enhanced estrogen-dependent tumor growth as observed in athymic mice. These results collectively suggest that the time of exposure to genistein is critical to the overall effect genistein will have on estrogen-dependent breast cancer tumor growth.
From the discussion presented here it is clear that the isoflavones possess diverse biological activities and potency. These activities are often dependent upon the concentration and timing of administration of the isoflavones. As a result, it is important to focus on what activities occur at plasma concentrations that are relevant to what is observed in humans consuming isoflavone containing diets. In regard to breast cancer, the isoflavones, specifically genistein, have paradoxical effects that can be resolved when you consider dosage and timing of administration. For example, prepubertal exposure to genistein appears to be protective against the development of breast cancer, but consumption of the phytoestrogen in either pure form or in soy protein isolate, after development of an estrogen-dependent breast cancer may enhance the growth of that tumor as determined by this study. Additional investigation into the biological activities of the isoflavones and soy itself is needed. The use of soy protein isolate as a dietary supplement may have numerous health benefits such as reducing risk of coronary heart disease by lowering serum cholesterol. However, for the subgroup of postmenopausal women who have or are at high risk of developing breast cancer there is need for additional consideration into the possibility of enhancing estrogen-dependent tumor growth by consumption of isoflavone containing products.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by NIH Grant CA77355 (to W. G. H.). ![]()
2 C. D. A. and K. F. A. contributed equally to this paper. ![]()
3 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at 580 Bevier Hall, Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801. Phone: (217) 244-5414; Fax: (217) 244-7877; E-mail: helferic{at}uiuc.edu ![]()
4 The abbreviations used are: E2, 17ß-estradiol; BrdUrd, 5-bromo-2'-deoxyuridine; LSI, low soy isolate; MSI, medium soy isolate; HSI, high soy isolate; LG, low genistein; MG, medium genistein; HG, high genistein; AIN 93G, American Institute of Nutrition 93 growth diet. ![]()
Received 8/ 9/00. Accepted 4/27/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin synthesis is increased pretransitionally in pigs fed the phenethanolamine ractopamine. Endocrinology, 126: 3096-3100, 1990.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Messina and A. H Wu Perspectives on the soy-breast cancer relation Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2009; 89(5): 1673S - 1679S. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Jiang, N. M. Patterson, Y. Ling, J. Xie, W. G. Helferich, and D. J. Shapiro Low Concentrations of the Soy Phytoestrogen Genistein Induce Proteinase Inhibitor 9 and Block Killing of Breast Cancer Cells by Immune Cells Endocrinology, November 1, 2008; 149(11): 5366 - 5373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Chang, T. H. Charn, S.-H. Park, W. G. Helferich, B. Komm, J. A. Katzenellenbogen, and B. S. Katzenellenbogen Estrogen Receptors {alpha} and {beta} as Determinants of Gene Expression: Influence of Ligand, Dose, and Chromatin Binding Mol. Endocrinol., May 1, 2008; 22(5): 1032 - 1043. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Bhatia, F. Greer, and and the Committee on Nutrition Use of Soy Protein-Based Formulas in Infant Feeding Pediatrics, May 1, 2008; 121(5): 1062 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Dip, S. Lenz, J.-P. Antignac, B. Le Bizec, H. Gmuender, and H. Naegeli Global gene expression profiles induced by phytoestrogens in human breast cancer cells Endocr. Relat. Cancer, March 1, 2008; 15(1): 161 - 173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Duffy, K. Perez, and A. Partridge Implications of Phytoestrogen Intake for Breast Cancer CA Cancer J Clin, September 1, 2007; 57(5): 260 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gallo, E. Mantuano, M. Fabrizi, C. Ferlini, S. Mozzetti, I. De Stefano, and G. Scambia Effects of a phytoestrogen-containing soy extract on the growth-inhibitory activity of ICI 182 780 in an experimental model of estrogen-dependent breast cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2007; 14(2): 317 - 324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. B. Michaud, J. P. Karpinski, K. L. Jones, and J. Espirito Dietary supplements in patients with cancer: Risks and key concepts, part 2 Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., March 1, 2007; 64(5): 467 - 480. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rice and S. A Whitehead Phytoestrogens and breast cancer -promoters or protectors? Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2006; 13(4): 995 - 1015. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Messina, W. McCaskill-Stevens, and J. W. Lampe Addressing the soy and breast cancer relationship: review, commentary, and workshop proceedings. J Natl Cancer Inst, September 20, 2006; 98(18): 1275 - 1284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Gallo, C. Ferlini, M. Fabrizi, S. Prislei, and G. Scambia Lack of stimulatory activity of a Phytoestrogen-containing soy extract on the growth of breast cancer tumors in mice Carcinogenesis, July 1, 2006; 27(7): 1404 - 1409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Ju, K. F. Allred, C. D. Allred, and W. G. Helferich Genistein stimulates growth of human breast cancer cells in a novel, postmenopausal animal model, with low plasma estradiol concentrations Carcinogenesis, June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1292 - 1299. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Ju, J. Fultz, K. F. Allred, D. R. Doerge, and W. G. Helferich Effects of dietary daidzein and its metabolite, equol, at physiological concentrations on the growth of estrogen-dependent human breast cancer (MCF-7) tumors implanted in ovariectomized athymic mice Carcinogenesis, April 1, 2006; 27(4): 856 - 863. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Yang, Z. T. Zhou, and J. P. Ge Effect of genistein on DMBA-induced oral carcinogenesis in hamster Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2006; 27(3): 578 - 583. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. H Wu, F. Z Stanczyk, C. Martinez, C.-C. Tseng, S. Hendrich, P. Murphy, S. Chaikittisilpa, D. O Stram, and M. C Pike A controlled 2-mo dietary fat reduction and soy food supplementation study in postmenopausal women Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2005; 81(5): 1133 - 1141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Liu, S. Edgerton, X. Yang, A. Kim, D. Ordonez-Ercan, T. Mason, K. Alvarez, C. McKimmey, N. Liu, and A. Thor Low-Dose Dietary Phytoestrogen Abrogates Tamoxifen-Associated Mammary Tumor Prevention Cancer Res., February 1, 2005; 65(3): 879 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L Hilakivi-Clarke, C Wang, M Kalil, R Riggins, and R G Pestell Nutritional modulation of the cell cycle and breast cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, December 1, 2004; 11(4): 603 - 622. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Allred, K. F. Allred, Y. H. Ju, T. S. Goeppinger, D. R. Doerge, and W. G. Helferich Soy processing influences growth of estrogen-dependent breast cancer tumors Carcinogenesis, September 1, 2004; 25(9): 1649 - 1657. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Sparreboom, M. C. Cox, M. R. Acharya, and W. D. Figg Herbal Remedies in the United States: Potential Adverse Interactions With Anticancer Agents J. Clin. Oncol., June 15, 2004; 22(12): 2489 - 2503. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-F. Chen and M.-S. Wong Genistein Enhances Insulin-Like Growth Factor Signaling Pathway in Human Breast Cancer (MCF-7) Cells J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., May 1, 2004; 89(5): 2351 - 2359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. D. Allred, K. F. Allred, Y. H. Ju, L. M. Clausen, D. R. Doerge, S. L. Schantz, D. L. Korol, M. A. Wallig, and W. G. Helferich Dietary genistein results in larger MNU-induced, estrogen-dependent mammary tumors following ovariectomy of Sprague-Dawley rats Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2004; 25(2): 211 - 218. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. G. Foster, E. V. Younglai, O. Boutross-Tadross, C. L. Hughes, and M. G. Wade Mammary Gland Morphology in Sprague-Dawley Rats following Treatment with an Organochlorine Mixture in Utero and Neonatal Genistein Toxicol. Sci., January 1, 2004; 77(1): 91 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bentrem, J. E. Fox, S. T. Pearce, H. Liu, S. Pappas, D. Kupfer, J. W. Zapf, and V. C. Jordan Distinct Molecular Conformations of the Estrogen Receptor {alpha} Complex Exploited by Environmental Estrogens Cancer Res., November 1, 2003; 63(21): 7490 - 7496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Belenky, J. Prasain, H. Kim, and S. Barnes DING, a Genistein Target in Human Breast Cancer: A Protein Without a Gene J. Nutr., July 1, 2003; 133(7): 2497S - 2501. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. S. Kurzer Phytoestrogen Supplement Use by Women J. Nutr., June 1, 2003; 133(6): 1983S - 1986. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Oktay, E. Buyuk, O. Davis, I. Yermakova, L. Veeck, and Z. Rosenwaks Fertility preservation in breast cancer patients: IVF and embryo cryopreservation after ovarian stimulation with tamoxifen Hum. Reprod., January 1, 2003; 18(1): 90 - 95. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. A. Weiger, M. Smith, H. Boon, M. A. Richardson, T. J. Kaptchuk, and D. M. Eisenberg Advising Patients Who Seek Complementary and Alternative Medical Therapies for Cancer Ann Intern Med, December 3, 2002; 137(11): 889 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-L. Sun, J.-M. Yuan, K. Arakawa, S.-H. Low, H.-P. Lee, and M. C. Yu Dietary Soy and Increased Risk of Bladder Cancer: the Singapore Chinese Health Study Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., December 1, 2002; 11(12): 1674 - 1677. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Jin and R. S. MacDonald Soy Isoflavones Increase Latency of Spontaneous Mammary Tumors in Mice J. Nutr., October 1, 2002; 132(10): 3186 - 3190. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Birdsall, S. Rey, J. Martin, and M. Rogers Naturopathic Medicine Analysis Integr Cancer Ther, June 1, 2002; 1(2): 189 - 192. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. H. Ju, D. R. Doerge, K. F. Allred, C. D. Allred, and W. G. Helferich Dietary Genistein Negates the Inhibitory Effect of Tamoxifen on Growth of Estrogen-dependent Human Breast Cancer (MCF-7) Cells Implanted in Athymic Mice Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(9): 2474 - 2477. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Messina, C. Gardner, and S. Barnes Gaining Insight into the Health Effects of Soy but a Long Way Still to Go: Commentary on the Fourth International Symposium on the Role of Soy in Preventing and Treating Chronic Disease J. Nutr., March 1, 2002; 132(3): 547S - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Messina and C. L. Loprinzi Soy for Breast Cancer Survivors: A Critical Review of the Literature J. Nutr., November 1, 2001; 131(11): 3095S - 3108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |