Cancer Research CR  Jordan
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinilla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Valmori, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinilla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Valmori, D.
[Cancer Research 61, 5153-5160, July 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Immunology

Combinatorial Peptide Libraries as an Alternative Approach to the Identification of Ligands for Tumor-reactive Cytolytic T Lymphocytes1

Clemencia Pinilla2,,3, Verena Rubio-Godoy2, Valerie Dutoit, Philippe Guillaume, Richard Simon, Yindong Zhao, Richard A. Houghten, Jean-Charles Cerottini, Pedro Romero and Danila Valmori4

Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies and Mixture Sciences, Inc., San Diego, California 92121 [C. P., R. A. H.]; Division of Clinical Onco-Immunology, Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland [V. R-G., V. D., J-C. C., P. R., D. V.]; Multidisciplinary Oncology Center, University Hospital, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland [P. G.]; and Molecular Statistics and Bioinformatic Section, Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [R. S., Y. Z.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The recent identification of molecularly defined human tumor antigens recognized by autologous CTLs has opened new opportunities for the development of antigen-specific cancer vaccines. Despite extensive work, however, the number of CTL-defined tumor antigens that are suitable targets for generic vaccination of cancer patients is still limited, mostly because of the painstaking and lengthy nature of the procedures currently used for their identification. A novel approach is based on the combined use of combinatorial peptide libraries in positional scanning format (positional scanning synthetic combinatorial peptide libraries, PS-SCLs) and tumor-reactive CTL clones. To validate this approach, we herein analyzed in detail the recognition of PS-SCLs by Melan-A-specific CTL clones. Our results indicate that, at least for some clones, most of the amino acids composing the native antigenic peptide can be identified through the use of PS-SCLs. Interestingly, this analysis also allowed the identification of peptide analogues with increased antigenic activity as well as agonist peptides containing multiple amino-acid substitutions. In addition, biometrical analysis of the data generated by PS-SCL screening allowed the identification of the native ligand in a public database. Overall, these data demonstrate the successful use of PS-SCLs for the identification and optimization of tumor-associated CTL epitopes.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
There is growing evidence for immune recognition of cancer cells by autologous human T cells (1 , 2) . Elucidating the nature of antigens recognized by tumor-reactive T cells is a prerequisite for designing effective cancer vaccines. Mostly based on in vitro recognition of cultured melanoma cell lines by autologous CD8+ and, less frequently, CD4+ tumor-reactive T-cell clones (3 , 4) , several categories of genes coding for potential tumor-associated antigens have been characterized (5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10) . However, peptides derived from these proteins and recognized by tumor-specific T cells are identified at a much slower rate.

Several approaches have been designed to this end. One approach consists in narrowing down the gene segment encoding the antigenic peptide by using target cells transfected with gene fragments. The deduced amino acid sequence of this segment is used to produce synthetic peptides that are then tested in a target-sensitization assay for recognition by tumor-reactive T-cell clones. An alternative approach is based on the acid elution and high-performance liquid chromatography fractionation of peptides present at the surface of in vitro cultured tumor cell lines (11) , which are then tested for recognition by tumor-reactive T-cell clones. By using this approach, the naturally presented peptide tyrosinase368–376 was shown to differ from the tyrosinase gene-deduced sequence (12) as a result of a posttranslational modification (13) . However, this approach is technically challenging, and its success relies on the relative abundance of few tumor-derived peptides at the surface of the few tumor cell lines that are able to grow in vitro to the high numbers required for peptide acid elution. Finally, a third strategy is based on the synthesis of putative antigenic peptides, corresponding to linear amino acid sequences of a known tumor antigen-associated protein and selected on the basis of the ability to bind to a particular MHC-class I molecule. The synthetic peptides are used to stimulate CD8+ T cells from either cancer patients or normal individuals. If peptide-specific CTL clones are obtained, they are used to assess whether the antigenic peptide is presented at the surface of tumor cells. However, a major drawback of this approach is that CTLs obtained in this way often fail to recognize tumor cells endogenously expressing the protein because the selected peptide is not generated efficiently by the processing machinery of the cell (14) .

Overall, these procedures are time consuming, labor intensive and not free from pitfalls. A novel approach for the direct identification of tumor-associated peptide epitopes is based on the use of combinatorial peptide libraries in positional scanning format. Typically, such libraries are composed of trillions of peptides systematically arranged in mixtures with defined amino acids at each position. The PS-SCL5 approach has been successfully applied in both the identification of biologically active peptides (15, 16, 17) and the study of B- and T-cell specificity (18) .

As a first step toward the use of the PS-SCL approach for the identification of CTL-defined tumor antigens, we analyzed in detail the recognition of PS-SCLs by tumor-reactive CD8+ T-cell clones that are specific for the cell-lineage-differentiation antigen Melan-A and that differ in terms of avidity and fine specificity. Our results show that, at least for some clones, most of the amino acids present in the native sequence could be identified among the most active peptide mixtures. Interestingly, through this approach, we could identify Melan-A peptide analogues with increased activity as well as agonist peptides containing multiple amino acid substitutions. In addition, biometrical analysis of the data generated by the PS-SCL screening allowed the identification of the native ligand in public databases. These data demonstrate that PS-SCLs can be used for the identification and optimization of tumor-associated CTL epitopes.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Libraries and Peptides Synthesis.
Two L-amino acid synthetic positional scanning peptide libraries, a nonapeptide (PCL 97–3) and a decapeptide (DCR 207) libraries arranged in a positional scanning format were prepared at Mixture Sciences Incorporated or at Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies (San Diego, CA) as described previously using the simultaneous multiple peptide synthesis method (19) . The nonapeptide PS-SCL consists of 180 mixtures in the OX8 format, where O represents one of the 20 natural L-amino acids in a defined position and X represents a mixture of all of the natural amino acids, with the exception of Cys (C), at each of the remaining positions. Each mixture in the library is composed of 1.6 x 1010 peptides, and the total X9 library consists of 3.1 x 1011 different nonamer peptides in approximate equimolar concentration. Assuming an average Mr of 1080 and a concentration of 100 µg/ml of the mixture, the concentration of each individual peptide is 5.5 x 10-15 M. The decapeptide PS-SCL consists of 200 mixtures in the OX9 format. In this PS-SCL the X represents a mixture of 18 amino acids [Cys and Trp (W) are not included]. Each mixture is composed of 1.9 x 1011 peptides and the total X10 library consists of 4.0 x 1012 of different peptides. Assuming an average Mr of 1200 and a concentration of 100 µg/ml of the mixture, the concentration of each individual peptide is 4.4 x 10-16 M. Both PS-SCLs have the N-terminal amino and the C-terminal amide. Individual peptides were synthesized by the simultaneous-multiple-peptide-synthesis method (19) . Purity and identity of each peptide were characterized using an electrospray mass spectrometer interfaced with a liquid chromatography system.

T-Cell Clones and Lines.
Melan-A-specific CTL clones were derived from tumor-infiltrated lymph node cells of patient LAU 203 by limiting dilution cultures in the presence of irradiated allogeneic PBMCs, phytohemagglutinin, and hrIL-2 as described previously (20) . They were subsequently expanded by periodical (3–4-week) restimulation into microtiter plates together with irradiated feeder cells in the presence of PHA and hrIL2. For peptide stimulation of PBMC, CD8+ lymphocytes were positively selected by magnetic cell sorting from PBMCs of HLA-A*0201 melanoma patients using a miniMACS device (Miltenyi Biotec GmBH, Sunnyvale, CA). Cells of the CD8- fraction were irradiated (3,000 rads) and used as autologous APCs. CD8+ highly enriched lymphocytes (1 x 106/condition) were stimulated with peptide (1 mM) and irradiated autologous APCs in 2 ml of medium containing hrIL-2 (100 units/ml; Glaxo, Geneva, Switzerland; kindly provided by Dr. M. Nabholz, ISREC, Epalinges, Switzerland) and hrIL-7 (10 ng/ml; R&D Systems, Europe, Oxon, United Kingdom). Cells underwent two additional cycles of weekly restimulation with peptide-pulsed APCs prior to A2/Melan-A tetramer analysis. Where indicated, CD8+ tetramer+ and CD8+ tetramer- cells were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting.

Antigen Recognition Assay.
Antigen recognition was assessed using a chromium-release assay as described previously (20) . Briefly, target cells were labeled with 51Cr for 1 h at 37°C and washed twice. Labeled target cells (1000 cells/well) were incubated in the presence of libraries (100 µg/ml final), or, in peptide titration experiment, with various concentrations of peptide, for 15 min at room temperature before the addition of effector cells at a L:T ratio of 10:1. Chromium release was measured in supernatants harvested after 4-h incubation at 37°C. The percentage specific lysis was calculated as:

Scoring Matrix and Database Searches.
A scoring matrix for each individual experiment was generated by transforming the percentage specific lysis of each mixture defined with 1 of the 20 L-amino acids in each of the 10 positions of the decamer libraries into numerical values that account for the SDs of replicates.6 The final scoring matrix for database search was derived by taking the average of the score matrices of multiple experimental data. On the basis of the assumption of independent and additive contribution of each position of a peptide, the score for an individual peptide was then calculated by adding the individual stimulatory values of the 10 amino acids in a decamer. A program was designed to use the matrix to score all of the overlapping 10-mers contained in the GenPept database and thus identify sequences with the predicted highest stimulatory values.

HLA-A*0201 Binding Assay.
The peptide-binding capacity to HLA-A*0201 was assessed in a functional competition assay based on the inhibition of recognition of the antigenic peptide tyrosinase368–376 (YMDGTMSQV) (12) by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL clone LAU 156 34 as described previously (20) . Briefly, T2 cells were 51Cr labeled in the presence of anti-class I mAb W6/32. Various concentrations of competitor peptides (50 µl) were incubated with 51Cr-labeled T2 cells (50 µl; 1000 cells/well) for 15 min at room temperature. A suboptimal dose (1 nM) of the antigenic peptide (50 µl) was then added together with specific CTLs (5000 cells/well; 50 µl). Chromium release was measured after a 4-h incubation at 37°C. The concentration of each competitor peptide required to achieve 50% inhibition of target cell lysis was then determined and is indicated as [nM] 50%. To facilitate comparison, the relative competitor activity of each peptide was calculated as the IC50 of the native Melan-A decapeptide divided by the IC50 of the competitor peptide.

Tetramers, mAbs, and Flow Cytometry Immunofluorescence Analysis.
Tetramers were prepared as described previously (21) . As the antigenic peptide, the Melan-A26–35 A27L analogue (ELAGIGILTV) was used; it has a higher binding affinity and stability than the native Melan-A decapeptide (EAAGIGILTV) or the nonapeptide (AAGIGILTV; Ref. 22 ). Interchangeability of native Melan-A decapeptide and the A27L analogue in terms of staining specificity has been assessed previously (21) . Peptide-stimulated CD8+-highly enriched T cells were stained with PE-labeled tetramers (10 µg/ml in 20 µl of mixture) during 1 h at room temperature; then 20 µl of anti-CD8FITC mAb (1:25 dilution; Becton Dickinson, San Jose, CA) were added and incubated for an additional 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed once in the same buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry. Data analysis was performed using Cell Quest software.


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recognition of Peptide Libraries by CD8+ Melan-A-specific T-Cell Clones.
We have previously shown that HLA-A2+ melanoma patients often develop a natural CD8+ T-cell response specific for the 26 (27)-35 region of Melan-A (21) . We have also observed that, although Melan-A-specific CTLs largely differ in terms of both avidity and fine specificity, the large majority preferentially recognize the decapeptide Melan-A26–35 as compared with the nonapeptide Melan-A27–35 (20 , 22) . Three CD8+ Melan-A-specific T-cell clones from patient LAU 203 were selected for this study. As illustrated in Fig. 1ACitation , the clones efficiently lysed the Melan-A-expressing autologous melanoma line Me 290, whereas they failed to lyse the Melan-A-expressing but HLA-A2- melanoma line Me 242. However, they largely differed in the recognition of antigenic synthetic peptides Melan-A26–35 (EAAGIGILTV) and Melan-A27–35 (AAGIGILTV) in terms of both avidity and fine specificity (Fig. 1B)Citation . Clone LAU 203 1.3 recognized peptide Melan-A27–35 better than it did Melan-A26–35; clone LAU 203 1.5 recognized peptide Melan-A26–35 better than it did Melan-A27–35; and clone LAU 203 17 recognized both peptides with similar efficiency. Fig. 1BCitation also shows that antigenic peptides containing an amidated carboxyl terminus were less efficiently recognized than peptides containing a free COOH terminus. This result was explained by a decreased HLA-A2 binding capacity of amidated nona- and deca- Melan-A peptide as compared with the corresponding carboxyl-free peptides as determined by functional competition assay (Ref. 20 ; and data not shown). However, the difference in COOH termini did not modify the hierarchy of peptide recognition. The selected clones were used to test the recognition of a nonapeptide PS-SCL and a decapeptide PS-SCL by standard chromium-release assay.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Tumor lysis and fine specificity of peptide recognition of Melan-A-specific CD8+ T-cell clones. Clones LAU 203 1.5, LAU 203 17, and LAU 203 1.3 were tested for antigen recognition in a 4-h chromium-release assay as detailed in "Materials and Methods." In A, lysis of chromium-labeled target cells was assessed at the indicated L:T ratio in the absence (open symbols) or presence (solid symbols) of peptide Melan-A26–35 (EAAGIGILTV). Me 290 (HLA-A*0201+, Melan-A+) and Me 242 (HLA-A*0201-, Melan-A+) are melanoma lines obtained in our laboratory from melanoma patients LAU 203 and LAU 92, respectively. In B, lysis of T2 cells was assessed at a L:T ratio of 10:1 in the presence of serial dilutions of the indicated peptides.

 
A compilation of the results of this analysis is reported in Table 1Citation . Only very low levels of specific lysis were obtained with clone LAU 203 1.3 with either the nona- or the decapeptide PS-SCL (less than 10%; not shown). Higher levels of specific lysis were obtained with clones LAU 203 1.5 and LAU 203 17, mainly with the decapeptide PS-SCL. Fig. 2Citation shows, as an example, the results obtained for clone LAU 203 1.5 and the decapeptide PS-SCL. At position 1, the highest activity was detected for the mixture having Arg (R) at this position. The mixtures containing at position 2 those amino acids known to function as strong anchors for binding to HLA-A*0201, i.e., Val (V), Ile (I), Leu (L), and Met (M), were among the most active in the lytic assay. In agreement with these data, we have previously shown that substitution of A27 of Melan-A26–35 with Leu results in improved recognition by Melan-A-specific CD8+ T cells (23) . At position 3, the two most active mixtures were defined with Thr (T) and Ala (A), the latter being the residue present at this position in the native decapeptide sequence. Similarly, at positions 4–7, the most active mixtures were defined with amino acids present at the corresponding positions in the native sequence. At position 8, several mixtures were active including, for example, those defined with His (H) and Phe (F) and, to a lesser extent, the mixture defined with Leu, which is the amino acid present at this position in Melan-A26–35. The mixture defined with Pro (P) at position 9 was well recognized followed by Thr, which is the residue present in the native peptide. Finally, at position 10, several mixtures including the ones defined with the native Val were identified. Thus, remarkably, for 8 of the 10 positions, mixtures containing amino acids corresponding to the native amino acid present at the selected position were among the most antigenic.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Summary of the recognition of nonapeptide and decapeptide PS-SCLs by Melan-A-specific clones

 


View larger version (38K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Recognition of decapeptide PS-SCL (DCR 207) by clone LAU 203 1.5. Recognition was assayed in a 4-h 51Cr release assay as detailed in "Materials and Methods." Each panel shows the level of specific lysis (Y axes) obtained in the presence of individual sublibraries, each containing 1 of the 20 natural amino acids at the defined positions (X axes). Thus, panel P1 contains the sublibraries with a defined amino acid at position 1 of the decapeptide. The amino acids are named according to the single-letter code. , amino acid corresponding to Melan-A26–35 native peptide sequence.

 
Similar results were obtained with clone LAU 203 17 and the decapeptide PS-SCL. In this case (Table 1)Citation , mixtures containing the amino acid corresponding to the native one for 7 of the 10 positions were among the most active. Interestingly, the mixture defined with Ala was identified among the most active at position 1 in line with our previous study that demonstrated that substitution of E26 with Ala resulted in improved recognition by most Melan-A-specific CD8+ T-cell clones (20) . We have also observed that this substitution synergizes with the substitution of A27 with Ala, generating a potent analogue (ALAGIGILTV; Ref. 24 ). Again, anchor amino acids for binding to HLA-A*0201 were identified at position 2. At position 3, mixtures containing Thr and Trp in addition to the native Ala were the most active. With the exception of position 7, at which a modest level of activity was detected for mixtures defined with Trp or Phe, either a Trp or the native amino acid were identified at the remaining positions.

A relatively low level of specific lysis was obtained for clone LAU 203 1.5 with the nonapeptide PS-SCL in agreement with the preference of this clone for the native decapeptide. In contrast, clone LAU 203 17, which recognized native Melan-A nona- and decapeptides with similar efficiency, also efficiently recognized the nonapeptide PS-SCL. However, in this case, the most active mixtures did not correspond to the ones defined with the native amino acids. All together, these results illustrate that, although no conclusive data could be obtained with the nonapeptide PS-SCL, for two of three Melan-A clones analyzed, most of the amino acids composing the native antigenic peptide could be identified with the decapeptide PS-SCL.

A biometrical data analysis (Ref. 25 and Zhao et al.6 ) that allows the comparison of the results of the PS-SCL screening with protein databases was used to assess whether the information derived from the decapeptide PS-SCL scan would have been adequate for the identification of the native ligand in case it had been unknown. The percentage specific killing values obtained for each mixture of the decapeptide PS-SCL were used to generate a score matrix. The score matrix was then used to calculate a predicted stimulatory score for each decapeptide present in proteins of a public database. Retrieved peptides were ranked according to their predicted stimulatory score. Table 2Citation shows the ranking for Melan-A26–35 obtained with the data generated with clones LAU 203 1.5 and LAU 203 17. The results show that the known native ligand ranked 4th and 22nd for clones LAU 203 17 and LAU 203 1.5, respectively, from a total of ~13 million decapeptides.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 Rank of Melan-A26–35 among all decapeptides on human database

 
Recognition of Decapeptide Analogues Deduced from PS-SCL Analysis.
On the basis of the results of the screening of decapeptide PS-SCL, two series of peptides containing amino acids that were defined in the most active mixtures for clones LAU 203 1.5 and 17 were synthesized and tested for recognition in peptide titration experiments. For clone LAU 203 1.5, the series included peptides having either single or multiple substitutions, whereas for clone LAU 203 17, only peptides containing multiple substitutions were synthesized. An illustration of the results of these analyses is given in Figs. 3Citation and 4Citation for clones LAU 203 1.5 and 17, respectively.



View larger version (47K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Recognition of single or multisubstituted analogues deduced from the screening of decapeptide PS-SCL by clone LAU203 1.5. In A, the relative antigenic activity of single or multisubstituted analogues deduced from the decapeptide PS-SCL was assessed in a 4-h 51Cr release assay, as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The peptide concentration required to obtain 50% of maximal activity ([nM] 50%) was determined for each peptide. Then, the relative antigenic activity was calculated as the [nM] 50% for the reference peptide Melan-A26–35 divided by that of the corresponding peptide analogue. In B, peptide titrations are shown for the native peptide Melan-A26–35 and for four analogues carrying a single substitution. Nr., number; E, Glu (amino acid).

 


View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Recognition of single or multisubstituted analogues deduced from the screening of decapeptide PS-SCL by clone LAU 203 17. In A, relative antigenic activity of single or multisubstituted analogues deduced from the decapeptide PS-SCL was assessed. In B, peptide titrations are shown for the native peptide Melan-A26–35 as well as for selected analogues.

 
For clone LAU 203 1.5, several peptides containing multiple substitutions including Val at position 2 (peptides 74, 76, 77, 80) were recognized as efficiently as the native peptide (Fig. 3)Citation . In contrast, peptides that contained single or multiple substitutions but not Val at position 2 were poorly recognized. These results can be explained, at least partially, by the improved binding to HLA-A*0201 consequent to the introduction of an anchor residue at position 2. Indeed, peptide 65 (containing Val as a single substitution at position 2) was significantly better recognized than the native decapeptide (66-fold) and showed an increased binding (3-fold; Fig. 5ACitation ) to HLA-A*0201.



View larger version (35K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Binding to HLA-A*0201 and recognition of peptide analogues 65, 81, 89, and 96 by polyclonal Melan-A monospecific cell lines from melanoma patients LAU 181 and LAU 233. In A, competitor activity was measured on the basis of the inhibition of recognition of peptide tyrosinase368–376 by the specific CTL clone LAU 156 34, as detailed in "Materials and Methods." The relative competitor activity was calculated using peptide 63 as the reference peptide with an arbitrary competitor activity of 1. The antigenic peptide Influenza matrix58–66 (Flu MA), which has been shown to bind to HLA-A*0201 with high affinity, was used as an internal standard. In B, peptide titrations are shown for the native peptide Melan-A26–35 as well as for peptides 65 (EVAGIGILTV); 81 (ALAGIGILTV); 89 (ALTGIGILTV); and 96 (ALTGWWWLTV).

 
For clone LAU 203 17, two peptides (81 and 89, containing A1, L2 and A1, L2, T3) were recognized much more efficiently than the native peptide (Fig. 4)Citation . The peptides exhibited an enhanced binding to HLA-A*0201 (Fig. 5A)Citation that could, at least partially, explain their improved recognition. In agreement with this interpretation is the observation that enhanced recognition was not clone specific, because peptides 65, 81, and 89 were recognized much more efficiently than was the native decapeptide and were recognized also by polyclonal Melan-A-specific cultures derived from two additional melanoma patients (Fig. 5B)Citation . Peptides containing Trp at positions 3–8, either as a single or a multiple substitution, were, in general, poorly recognized by clone LAU 203 17 with few exceptions (peptides 96 and 100). Indeed and remarkably, peptide 96 (ALTGWWWLTV), which contains six substituted positions, was recognized at least as efficiently as the native peptide was by clone LAU 203 17, as well as by polyclonal cultures (Fig. 5B)Citation . Efficient recognition of peptide 96 by Melan-A-specific T cells could not be solely explained by its improved binding to HLA-A*0201 as compared with the native decapeptide sequence. Indeed, peptide 93, which also exhibited highly improved binding, was not recognized. In addition, the C-terminal carboxyl analogue of peptide 96 was not recognized by Melan-A-specific CTLs, although it was able to bind to HLA-A*0201 with higher affinity than did its C-terminal amide form (data not shown).

As shown in Fig. 6ACitation , peptide 96 was immunogenic and able to stimulate the expansion of Melan-A specific T-cell precursors. Remarkably, in vitro stimulation of CD8+ T cells from patient LAU 203 with this peptide resulted in a significant expansion of Melan-A-specific T cells, as assessed by staining with A2/Melan-A tetramers (21) , more efficiently than stimulation with the native decapeptide, although less efficiently as compared with an enhanced analogue (peptide 81). To assess the extent of cross-reactivity between CTLs elicited by stimulation with the peptide analogue and the native decapeptide, CD8+ tetramer+ and CD8+ tetramer- fractions were isolated by tetramer-guided cell sorting, and their lytic activity was assayed on T2 or tumor cell targets (Fig. 6B)Citation . Comparable levels of specific lysis on T2 cells were detected for the CD8+ tetramer+ cell fraction in the presence of peptides 63 and 96. The two peptides were recognized with comparable efficiency by CD8+ tetramer+ T cells as determined by peptide titration assay (Fig. 6C)Citation For the CD8+ tetramer- cell fraction, however, a lower but significant level of specific lysis was detected on T2 cells in the presence of peptide 96 but not in the presence of peptide 63, thus suggesting the presence, within this cell fraction, of a subpopulation non-cross-reactive with the native peptide (Fig. 6B)Citation . In addition, CD8+ tetramer+ but not CD8+ tetramer- cells were able to efficiently lyse Melan-A-expressing tumor cells (Fig. 6B)Citation . All together, these results show that peptides with little sequence homology but that are fully cross-reactive with the native peptide can be identified through the screening and deconvolution of PS-SCLs.



View larger version (43K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Elicitation of Melan-A specific T-cell response by stimulation with a library-deduced peptide mimic. A, stimulatory capacity of native and analogue Melan-A peptides monitored by flow cytometry with A2/Melan-A peptide tetramers. CD8+ T cells from patient LAU 203 were stimulated with the indicated peptide as detailed in "Materials and Methods." Cultures were stained 7 days after the third stimulation with A2/Melan-A tetramersPE together with anti-CD8FITC mAb. Numbers in the upper right quadrant, the percentage of A2/Melan-A tetramersPE and CD8FITC double+ cells. CD8+ tetramer+ and CD8+ tetramer- fractions from peptide 96-stimulated culture were isolated by tetramer-guided cell sorting. In B, the lytic activity of CD8+ tetramer+ and CD8+ tetramer- fractions was assayed on T2 cells alone as well as in the presence of peptides 63 or 96. Additionally, the lysis of two tumor cell lines (Me 275, Me 290) was assessed in the absence of peptide. In C, the efficiency of recognition of peptides 63 and 96 by CD8+ tetramer+ T cells was quantitated in a peptide titration assay as detailed in "Materials and Methods."

 

    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Recent studies have reported the use of combinatorial peptide libraries to identify sequences that are able to stimulate CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell clones (18) . To explore the possibility of applying this methodology to the identification of antigens recognized by tumor-reactive CD8+ T-cell clones, we have analyzed the recognition of PS-SCLs by tumor-reactive Melan-A-specific CD8+ T-cell clones. Our results show that for two of the three clones analyzed (namely the ones that preferentially recognize the decapeptide Melan-A26–35) most of the amino acids present at the corresponding positions in the native sequence (7 of 10 for clone LAU 203 17, and 8 of 10 for clone LAU 203 1.5) were identified with a decapeptide PS-SCL. In addition, biometrical analysis of the data generated by PS-SCL screening allowed the identification of the native ligand in a public database.6 All together, these results strongly encourage the use of PS-SCLs for the identification of the antigenic sequences recognized by CTL clones of unknown specificity. It is of note that, although the clones used here were of known HLA restriction, this approach is easily applicable to clones restricted to other HLA molecules, as well as to clones of unknown restriction, simply by using autologous APCs.

It is not immediately clear why the native sequence was not identified with the nonapeptide PS-SCLs. This is particularly intriguing in the case of clone LAU 203 17, which recognizes nona- and decapeptides with comparable avidity. However, a similar analysis of the nonapeptide PS-SCL [specific for peptide tyrosinase368–376 (12) ] with a CTL clone resulted in the identification of most of the amino acids present at the corresponding position in the native tyrosinase peptide sequence among the most active peptide mixtures (data not shown) which argues against a general lack of recognition of the nonapeptide PS-SCL by CTL clones. Thus, in the case of CTL clones of unknown specificity, it would be advantageous to test PS-SCLs of different lengths to maximize the chances of obtaining positive results. Also, the reasons why some tumor-reactive clones (e.g., clone LAU 203 1.3) fail to efficiently recognize any of the analyzed peptide libraries are not clear and remain to be further investigated.

The peptide libraries used in the present study are made of synthetic peptides having a C-terminal amide. Although the C-terminal amide Melan-A26 (27)-35 peptides bind HLA-A*0201 with a lower affinity than do their C-terminal carboxyl forms and are recognized less efficiently by Melan-A-specific CTLs, the overall effect of C-termini amidation on the recognition of PS-SCLs is difficult to evaluate. Indeed, it has been recently shown that C-terminal amidation of Melan-A26–35 protects the peptide from enzymatic degradation and significantly increases the peptide half-life in serum (26) . Protection from enzymatic degradation could be critical for the recognition of single peptides present at subfemtomolar concentration in the PS-SCLs. Future experiments will directly address these issues by comparing the recognition of amidated and carboxyl-free PS-SCLs.

In the case of clones LAU 203 17 and 1.5, several amino acids that are different from the amino acid present at the corresponding position of the native sequence were also identified. In some cases, the replacement of native amino acids with these amino acids, either as single (peptide 65) or multiple substitutions (peptides 81 and 89), resulted in an improved recognition by CTLs as well as in highly improved immunogenicity. This effect was not clone specific and could be at least partially explained by an improved binding to HLA-A2. In several other cases, substitution of native amino acids with defined amino acids present in the active mixtures as single, and often as multiple substitutions, resulted in peptides of reduced antigenicity. Sometimes, however, as illustrated by our findings with peptide 96, multiple substitution of native amino acids with defined amino acids in the active mixtures may allow the identification of fully cross-reactive analogues without obvious sequence homology to the native sequence. The identification of these analogues depends strictly on the PS-SCL used, as suggested by the observation that the carboxyl-free analogue of peptide 96 was not recognized by Melan-A-specific CTLs, although it was able to bind to HLA-A*0201 with higher affinity than was its amidated form. It is of note that, taking into account that PS-SCLs were tested at 100 µg/ml final, the concentration of each individual peptide is of 5.5 x 10-15 M and 4.4 x 10-16 M in each mixture, for the nonapeptide and decapeptide PS-SCL, respectively. Because the recognition signal in our chromium-release assay is completely extinguished at peptide concentrations lower than 10-12 M, it is clear that multiple peptides in the mixtures are simultaneously recognized by the T-cell clone. Overall, these data are in agreement with previous observations on TCR recognition. Indeed, although TCR recognition was initially believed to be highly specific, recent studies have shown that it is, at the same time, highly degenerate (27) . Many different MHC-peptide complexes can bind to a single TCR with different affinities, which results in a variety of functions going from full T-cell activation to antagonism. Besides high-affinity ligands being able to fully activate mature T cells under physiological conditions, MHC-peptide complexes that bind to the TCR with low affinities play an important role during thymic selection (28) and in the survival of mature T cells in the periphery (29) .

These phenomena are particularly relevant when analyzing autoreactive T-cell clones. However, because of their complexity, the molecular basis as well as the extent of the degeneracy of T-cell recognition of antigen-specific clonal T-cell populations is difficult to evaluate. Degeneracy of antigen recognition by Melan-A-specific T cells has been previously addressed (30) by searching a protein database using the program findpatterns with an input pattern generated based on the recognition data of a total of 46 analogues that are singly substituted at positions P1-P9 of Melan-A27–35. Among the candidate mimicry peptides retrieved in that study, peptide gC448–488 from a herpes virus was cross-recognized by a Melan-A-specific CTL. However, this peptide was not recognized by several other monoclonal and polyclonal Melan-A-specific T-cell populations derived in our laboratory, including the ones used in the present study (data not shown). An alternative and more comprehensive method for the identification of epitope mimics from either human autoantigens or pathogens consists in screening protein databases with scoring matrices generated from PS-SCL screening data by transforming the stimulatory potency of each of the 20 amino acids in each position of the libraries into numerical values as described recently (Ref. 25 and Zhao et al.6 ). By applying this method, we were able to identify the native Melan-A peptide sequence among decapeptides present in proteins of public databases. Recognition of additional sequences identified with this analysis is currently being assessed in our laboratory. In conclusion, in the present study we have focused on the analysis of the T-cell recognition of PS-SCLs by using a 51Cr release assay that measures the lytic activity of in vitro cultured CD8+ T-cell populations. This provides a valid strategy to rapidly obtain information about sequences recognized by tumor-reactive CTL clones of clinical relevance. At the same time, it will be instrumental to analyze the extent of degeneracy in TCR recognition of tumors antigens. In addition, by simultaneously measuring other cell functions such as proliferation and cytokine secretion, more complete information could be obtained. These issues will be the focus of future studies.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Nicole Montandon for excellent technical assistance and Martine van Overloop for assistance in manuscript preparation. And we are grateful to the melanoma patients for their generous participation in this research project.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 V. R-G. was supported by the Swiss Cancer League Grant SKL 782-2-1999. Back

2 C. P. and V. R-G. contributed equally to this work. Back

3 To whom correspondence about the use of combinatorial peptide libraries should be addressed, at Torrey Pines Institute for Molecular Studies and Mixture Sciences, Inc., 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, CA, 92121. E-mail: cpinilla{at}tpims.org Back

4 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Division of Clinical Onco-Immunology, Hôpital Orthopédique, Avenue Pierre-Decker, 4, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland. Phone: 41-21-314-01-76; Fax: 41-21-314-74-77; E-mail: danila.valmori{at}inst.hospvd.ch Back

5 The abbreviations used are: PS-SCL, positional scanning synthetic combinatorial peptide library; PBMC, peripheral blood-derived mononuclear cell; hrIL, human recombinant interleukin; APC, antigen-presenting cell; mAb, monoclonal antibody; PE, phycoerythrin; TCR, T-cell receptor for antigen; L:T, lymphocyte:target cell (ratio). Back

6 Y. Zhao, B. Gran, C. Pinilla, S. Markovic-Plese, B. Hemmer, A. Tzou, L. Whithney, W. E. Biddison, R. Martine, and R Simon. Combinatorial peptide libraries and biometric score matrices permit the quantitative analysis of specific and degenerate interactions between clonotypic T-cell receptors and MHC-peptide ligands, in press. Back

Received 1/26/01. Accepted 4/26/01.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Boon T., van der Bruggen P. Human tumor antigens recognized by T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med., 183: 725-729, 1996.[Free Full Text]
  2. Rosenberg S. A. A new era for cancer immunotherapy based on the genes that encode cancer antigens. Immunity, 10: 281-287, 1999.[Medline]
  3. Romero P. Cytolytic T lymphocyte responses of cancer patients to tumor-associated antigens. Springer Semin. Immunopathol., 18: 185-198, 1996.[Medline]
  4. Pardoll D. M., Topalian S. L. The role of CD4+ T cell responses in antitumor immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 10: 588-594, 1998.[Medline]
  5. Coulie P. G., Brichard V., Van Pel A., Wolfel T., Schneider J., Traversari C., Mattei S., De Plaen E., Lurquin C., Szikora J. P., et al A new gene coding for a differentiation antigen recognized by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes on HLA-A2 melanomas[see comments]. J. Exp. Med., 180: 35-42, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. van der Bruggen P., Traversari C., Chomez P., Lurquin C., De Plaen E., Van den Eynde B., Knuth A., Boon T. A gene encoding an antigen recognized by cytolytic T lymphocytes on a human melanoma. Science (Wash. DC), 254: 1643-1647, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Wolfel T., Hauer M., Schneider J., Serrano M., Wolfel C., Klehmann-Hieb E., De Plaen E., Hankeln T., Meyer zum Buschenfelde K. H., Beach D. A p16INK4a-insensitive CDK4 mutant targeted by cytolytic T lymphocytes in a human melanoma. Science (Wash. DC), 269: 1281-1284, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wang R. F., Wang X., Atwood A. C., Topalian S. L., Rosenberg S. A. Cloning genes encoding MHC class II-restricted antigens: mutated CDC27 as a tumor antigen. Science (Wash. DC), 284: 1351-1354, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. De Plaen E., Arden K., Traversari C., Gaforio J. J., Szikora J. P., De Smet C., Brasseur F., van der Bruggen P., Lethe B., Lurquin C., et al Structure, chromosomal localization, and expression of 12 genes of the MAGE family. Immunogenetics, 40: 360-369, 1994.[Medline]
  10. Sahin U., Tureci O., Pfreundschuh M. Serological identification of human tumor antigens. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9: 709-716, 1997.[Medline]
  11. Engelhard V. H. Direct identification of tumor-associated peptide antigens. Springer Semin. Immunopathol., 18: 171-183, 1996.[Medline]
  12. Wolfel T., Van Pel A., Brichard V., Schneider J., Seliger B., Meyer zum Buschenfelde K. H., Boon T. Two tyrosinase nonapeptides recognized on HLA-A2 melanomas by autologous cytolytic T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol., 24: 759-764, 1994.[Medline]
  13. Skipper J. C., Hendrickson R. C., Gulden P. H., Brichard V., Van Pel A., Chen Y., Shabanowitz J., Wolfel T., Slingluff C. L., Jr., Boon T., Hunt D. F., Engelhard V. H. An HLA-A2-restricted tyrosinase antigen on melanoma cells results from posttranslational modification and suggests a novel pathway for processing of membrane proteins. J. Exp. Med., 183: 527-534, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Valmori D., Gileadi U., Servis C., Dunbar P. R., Cerottini J. C., Romero P., Cerundolo V., Levy F. Modulation of proteasomal activity required for the generation of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte-defined peptide derived from the tumor antigen MAGE-3. J. Exp. Med., 189: 895-906, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Dooley C. T., Houghten R. A. The use of positional scanning synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries for the rapid determination of opioid receptor ligands. Life Sci., 52: 1509-1517, 1993.[Medline]
  16. Eichler J., Lucka A. W., Houghten R. A. Cyclic peptide template combinatorial libraries: synthesis and identification of chymotrypsin inhibitors. Pept. Res., 7: 300-307, 1994.[Medline]
  17. Houghten R. A., Pinilla C., Appel J. R., Blondelle S. E., Dooley C. T., Eichler J., Nefzi A., Ostresh J. M. Mixture-based synthetic combinatorial libraries. J. Med. Chem., 42: 3743-3778, 1999.[Medline]
  18. Pinilla C., Martin R., Gran B., Appel J. R., Boggiano C., Wilson D. B., Houghten R. A. Exploring immunological specificity using synthetic peptide combinatorial libraries. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 11: 193-202, 1999.[Medline]
  19. Pinilla C., Appel J. R., Houghten R. A. Investigation of antigen-antibody interactions using a soluble, non-support-bound synthetic decapeptide library composed of four trillion (4 x 1012) sequences. Biochem. J., 301: 847-853, 1994.
  20. Valmori D., Gervois N., Rimoldi D., Fonteneau J. F., Bonelo A., Lienard D., Rivoltini L., Jotereau F., Cerottini J. C., Romero P. Diversity of the fine specificity displayed by HLA-A*0201-restricted CTL specific for the immunodominant Melan-A/MART-1 antigenic peptide[Published erratum appears in J. Immunol., 163: 1093, 1999]. J. Immunol., 161: 6956-6962, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Romero P., Dunbar P. R., Valmori D., Pittet M., Ogg G. S., Rimoldi D., Chen J-L., Liénard D., Cerottini J. C., Cerundolo V. Ex vivo staining of metastatic lymph nodes by class I major histocompatibility complex tetramers reveals high numbers of antigen-experienced tumor-specific cytolytic T lymphocytes. J. Exp. Med., 188: 1641-1650, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Romero P., Gervois N., Schneider J., Escobar P., Valmori D., Pannetier C., Steinle A., Wolfel T., Lienard D., Brichard V., van Pel A., Jotereau F., Cerottini J. C. Cytolytic T lymphocyte recognition of the immunodominant HLA-A*0201-restricted Melan-A/MART-1 antigenic peptide in melanoma. J. Immunol., 159: 2366-2374, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Valmori D., Fonteneau J. F., Lizana C. M., Gervois N., Lienard D., Rimoldi D., Jongeneel V., Jotereau F., Cerottini J. C., Romero P. Enhanced generation of specific tumor-reactive CTL in vitro by selected Melan-A/MART-1 immunodominant peptide analogues. J. Immunol., 160: 1750-1758, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Valmori D., Pittet M. J., Rimoldi D., Lienard D., Dunbar R., Cerundolo V., Lejeune F., Cerottini J. C., Romero P. An antigen-targeted approach to adoptive transfer therapy of cancer. Cancer Res., 59: 2167-2173, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Hemmer B., Gran B., Zhao Y., Marques A., Pascal J., Tzou A., Kondo T., Cortese I., Bielekova B., Straus S. E., McFarland H. F., Houghten R., Simon R., Pinilla C., Martin R. Identification of candidate T-cell epitopes and molecular mimics in chronic Lyme disease[see comments]. Nat. Med., 5: 1375-1382, 1999.[Medline]
  26. Brinckerhoff L. H., Kalashnikov V. V., Thompson L. W., Yamshchikov G. V., Pierce R. A., Galavotti H. S., Engelhard V. H., Slingluff C. L., Jr. Terminal modifications inhibit proteolytic degradation of an immunogenic MART-1(27–35) peptide: implications for peptide vaccines. Int. J. Cancer, 83: 326-334, 1999.[Medline]
  27. Hemmer B., Vergelli M., Pinilla C., Houghten R., Martin R. Probing degeneracy in T-cell recognition using peptide combinatorial libraries. Immunol Today., 19: 163-168, 1998.[Medline]
  28. Kisielow P., von Boehmer H. Development and selection of T cells: facts and puzzles. Adv. Immunol., 58: 87-209, 1995.[Medline]
  29. Kirberg J., Berns A., von Boehmer H. Peripheral T cell survival requires continual ligation of the T cell receptor to major histocompatibility complex-encoded molecules. J. Exp. Med., 186: 1269-1275, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Loftus D. J., Castelli C., Clay T. M., Squarcina P., Marincola F. M., Nishimura M. I., Parmiani G., Appella E., Rivoltini L. Identification of epitope mimics recognized by CTL reactive to the melanoma/melanocyte-derived peptide MART-1(27–35). J. Exp. Med., 184: 647-657, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. J. Armishaw, N. Singh, J. L. Medina-Franco, R. J. Clark, K. C. M. Scott, R. A. Houghten, and A. A. Jensen
A Synthetic Combinatorial Strategy for Developing {alpha}-Conotoxin Analogs as Potent {alpha}7 Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor Antagonists
J. Biol. Chem., January 15, 2010; 285(3): 1809 - 1821.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int ImmunolHome page
V. Voelter, N. Rufer, S. Reynard, G. Greub, R. Brookes, P. Guillaume, F. Grosjean, T. Fagerberg, O. Michelin, S. Rowland-Jones, et al.
Characterization of Melan-A reactive memory CD8+ T cells in a healthy donor
Int. Immunol., August 1, 2008; 20(8): 1087 - 1096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
K. R. Jordan, R. H. McMahan, J. Z. Oh, M. R. Pipeling, D. M. Pardoll, R. M. Kedl, J. W. Kappler, and J. E. Slansky
Baculovirus-Infected Insect Cells Expressing Peptide-MHC Complexes Elicit Protective Antitumor Immunity
J. Immunol., January 1, 2008; 180(1): 188 - 197.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Lustgarten, A. L. Dominguez, and C. Pinilla
Identification of Cross-Reactive Peptides Using Combinatorial Libraries Circumvents Tolerance against Her-2/neu-Immunodominant Epitope
J. Immunol., February 1, 2006; 176(3): 1796 - 1805.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
Y. Wang, A. Rubtsov, R. Heiser, J. White, F. Crawford, P. Marrack, and J. W. Kappler
Using a baculovirus display library to identify MHC class I mimotopes
PNAS, February 15, 2005; 102(7): 2476 - 2481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
V. Rubio-Godoy, V. Dutoit, Y. Zhao, R. Simon, P. Guillaume, R. Houghten, P. Romero, J.-C. Cerottini, C. Pinilla, and D. Valmori
Positional Scanning-Synthetic Peptide Library-Based Analysis of Self- and Pathogen-Derived Peptide Cross-Reactivity with Tumor-Reactive Melan-A-Specific CTL
J. Immunol., November 15, 2002; 169(10): 5696 - 5707.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
V. Dutoit, V. Rubio-Godoy, M. J. Pittet, A. Zippelius, P.-Y. Dietrich, F. A. Legal, P. Guillaume, P. Romero, J.-C. Cerottini, R. A. Houghten, et al.
Degeneracy of Antigen Recognition as the Molecular Basis for the High Frequency of Naive A2/Melan-A Peptide Multimer+ CD8+ T Cells in Humans
J. Exp. Med., July 15, 2002; 196(2): 207 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Rubio-Godoy, C. Pinilla, V. Dutoit, E. Borras, R. Simon, Y. Zhao, J.-C. Cerottini, P. Romero, R. Houghten, and D. Valmori
Toward Synthetic Combinatorial Peptide Libraries in Positional Scanning Format (PS-SCL)-based Identification of CD8+ Tumor-reactive T-Cell Ligands: A Comparative Analysis of PS-SCL Recognition by a Single Tumor-reactive CD8+ Cytolytic T-Lymphocyte Clone
Cancer Res., April 1, 2002; 62(7): 2058 - 2063.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
A. Zippelius, M. J. Pittet, P. Batard, N. Rufer, M. de Smedt, P. Guillaume, K. Ellefsen, D. Valmori, D. Lienard, J. Plum, et al.
Thymic Selection Generates a Large T Cell Pool Recognizing a Self-Peptide in Humans
J. Exp. Med., February 19, 2002; 195(4): 485 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
Y. Zhao, B. Gran23, C. Pinilla, S. Markovic-Plese, B. Hemmer, A. Tzou, L. W. Whitney, W. E. Biddison, R. Martin, and R. Simon
Combinatorial Peptide Libraries and Biometric Score Matrices Permit the Quantitative Analysis of Specific and Degenerate Interactions Between Clonotypic TCR and MHC Peptide Ligands
J. Immunol., August 15, 2001; 167(4): 2130 - 2141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pinilla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Valmori, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pinilla, C.
Right arrow Articles by Valmori, D.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online