| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
, Implicated in Spontaneous and DNA Damage-induced Mutagenesis, Is Overexpressed in Lung Cancer1
Divisions of Pathology [J. O-W., K. K., Y. T., S. S., M. T.] and Thoracic Diseases [H. K.], Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, Chiba 260-8717, Japan, and Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan [H. O.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Pol
) is a newly identified low-fidelity polymerase implicated in spontaneous and DNA damage-induced mutagenesis. As an initial study to investigate its possible involvement in tumorigenesis, we compared the expression level of Pol
in tumors and adjacent nontumorous tissues by Northern blot, semiquantitative RT-PCR, and Western blot analyses. In this study, paired tumor and normal specimens from 29 patients with stages I to IIIb non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), including 13 adenocarcinomas, 15 squamous cell cancers, and 1 adenosquamous carcinoma, were analyzed, among which different levels of tumor-associated Pol
overexpression were observed in 21 of 29 matched specimens. In addition, five matched specimens exhibited elevated Pol
expression in both tumor and control tissues, whereas only one nontumorous tissue expressed a higher level of Pol
than its tumor counterpart. The preferential up-regulation of Pol
expression in tumors was highly significant (P < 0.001). There was no apparent correlation of Pol
expression levels with tumor histology, grade, and stage or with smoking history. Southern blot analysis did not show amplification of the Pol
gene, indicating that the elevated Pol
expression is likely attributable to dysregulated transcription. Our data suggest that Pol
may contribute to lung tumor development by accelerating the accumulation of mutations. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, Pol
, Pol
, Pol
, and Rev1 (1, 2, 3)
. Either error-free or error-prone bypass can be accomplished depending on the polymerases used, the type of lesions encountered, and the sequence context of the lesions. Errors, however, seem to occur in most cases and result in mutagenesis. Interestingly, deficiency in Pol
, which is able to correctly bypass UV-induced cyclobutane thymine dimers, causes xeroderma pigmentosum variant, a genetically inherited disorder highly susceptible to sunlight-induced skin cancers (4
, 5)
. Although this finding illustrates the significance of this class of polymerases in human disease, the biological functions of the other lesion-bypassing polymerases are still poorly understood.
Pol
is a low-fidelity polymerase with moderate processivity and is highly inaccurate when replicating undamaged DNA (6, 7, 8)
. Pol
is the mammalian homologue of the Escherichia coli DinB (9
, 10)
, which is required for
-phage untargeted mutagenesis (11)
. Overexpression of DinB in E. coli greatly increases mutagenesis in the absence of exogenous DNA-damaging agent (12)
. Likewise, transient expression of the Pol
gene in cultured mouse cells caused a 10-fold increase in the incidence of mutations in the endogenous Hprt locus (10)
. In addition, Pol
can carry out error-prone bypass of certain DNA lesions (6
, 13)
, including an abasic site, N-2-acetylaminofluorene guanine adduct and 8-oxoguanine. Collectively, these results have implicated Pol
in mutagenesis.
Despite the highly mutagenic properties of Pol
, no evidence has been provided that indicates its possible involvement in human cancer. In the present study, we have examined Pol
expression in paired tumor and normal specimens from NSCLC.3
The analysis revealed elevated Pol
expression in a high percentage of lung tumors in comparison with their nontumorous tissue counterparts. Our data suggest a link between Pol
expression and lung cancer and implicate a role for Pol
in tumorigenesis.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
RNA Extraction and RT-PCR Analysis.
Surgically resected tissue (
100 mg) was homogenized mechanically in 1 ml of TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc., Rockville, MD), and the total RNA was extracted according to the manufacturers protocol. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 5 µg of total RNA using SuperScript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.) and random primers following the companys protocol. PCR reaction was performed in 20 µl of buffer containing 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM each dNTP, 5 pmol each primer, and 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). For glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene expression, forward (5'-ACCACAGTCCATGCCATCAC-3') and reverse (5'-TCCACCACCCTGTTGCTGTA-3') primers were used, and the amplification was performed at 94°C for 15 s, 60°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 40 s for 25 cycles. For human Pol
expression, forward (5'-GCCATGCCAGGATTTATTGCTA-3') and reverse (5'-CTCCTTTGTTGGTGTTTCCT-3') primers were used, and the reaction was performed at 95°C for 5 s, 61°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 2 min for 30 cycles. For Pol
expression, forward (5'-ACCCAGGCAACTACCCAAAAC-3') and reverse (5'-GGGCTCAGTTCCTGTACTTTG-3') primers were used, and the amplification was carried out at 95°C for 5 s, 61°C for 10 s, and 72°C for 1 min for 30 cycles.
Northern and Southern Blot Analyses.
For Northern blot analysis, 10 µg of total RNA was resolved in 1% formaldehyde agarose gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The membrane was baked at 80°C for 1 h under vacuum and hybridized with a 32P-labeled 1133-bp human Pol
cDNA fragment (corresponding to nucleotides +451 to +1583 relative to the translational start codon +1). The membrane was stripped and rehybridized with an 18S rRNA probe to ensure the equal loading of the RNA. For Southern blot analysis, 10 µg of high-molecular weight DNA was digested with HindIII, size-fractionated in 0.7% agarose gel, transferred to a nylon membrane, and hybridized with the same human Pol
probe. The membrane was similarly rehybridized with a human Rev3 probe corresponding to nucleotides 1772 to 2979 of the published sequence (14)
.
Western Blot Analysis.
The tissue (100 mg) was homogenized in 1 ml of lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 6.8), 2% SDS, 1 M 2-mercaptoethanol, and 10% glycerol] containing a cocktail of protease inhibitors (Sigma Chemical Co.), 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and 1 mM EDTA and then sonicated for 2 min. The lysate proteins were centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 3 min, and the supernatant was heated at 100°C for 5 min before loading to an 8% SDS polyacrylamide gel. The resolved proteins were transferred to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane with a semidry blotter, blocked with I-block (Tropix, Bedford, MA) at 4°C overnight, reacted with 0.3 µg/ml of the rabbit antibodies to Pol
and then by horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat antibodies to rabbit IgG (Life Technologies, Inc.). The membrane was developed with enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), following the companys protocol.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Expression in Tumors and Their Matched Nontumorous Tissue.
expression. The clinicopathological features of these cancers are summarized in Table 1
was overexpressed in tumors but not in their nontumorous tissue counterparts (Fig. 1A)
expression was elevated both in tumor and nontumorous tissues in four matched specimens (cases 11, 16, 19, and 21) and was undetectable in one matched specimen (case 14; Fig. 1A
expression in five of eight tumors (cases 23, 24, and 2628) and decreased Pol
expression in one tumor (case 29) relative to their control tissues (Fig. 1B)
expression could be detected both in tumor and nontumorous tissues in case 22, whereas only faint bands were detectable in case 25. The preferential up-regulation of Pol
expression in tumor relative to nontumor is statistically significant (P < 0.001; Fishers exact test), and the overall expression pattern of the Pol
gene is summarized in Table 1
, a related translesional DNA polymerase belonging to the same Dinb/UmuC superfamily (9
, 10)
. In contrast to Pol
, Pol
was expressed at similar levels in both tumor and normal specimens (Fig. 1C)
expression is specific for lung cancer.
|
|
protein. Consistent with the results of Northern blot and RT-PCR analysis, the Mr 96,000 Pol
protein was observed in tumors but not in their control tissues in cases 35 and was undetectable in case 25 (Fig. 2)
protein was reduced to Mr
85,000. This smaller product is likely derived from alternatively spliced transcripts (9)
. Although in general the elevated Pol
RNA expression was accompanied by an increase in Pol
protein, the nontumorous tissue of case 11 expressed a higher level of Pol
mRNA (Fig. 1A)
protein (Fig. 2)
expression may be regulated by both transcriptional and posttranscriptional mechanisms. The Mr 96,000 band could also be detected in COS-7 cells transfected with a human Pol
cDNA but not an empty vector (Fig. 2)
gene product. There was no apparent correlation between Pol
expression levels and specific clinicopathological features of the NSCLC. A greater number of lung cancer specimens are now under investigation to determine whether elevated Pol
expression might be related to smoking history, metastasis, and clinical outcome.
|
Gene Is Not Amplified.
gene. On the basis of the relative band intensities between the Pol
gene and Rev3, a ubiquitously expressed gene (15)
, we concluded that the Pol
gene was not amplified in the tumors (Fig. 3)
probe detected four bands (5, 3.8, 3.3, and 2.1 kb) in all tumor and nontumorous tissues, as well as in the control placental DNA. There were no aberrant bands in any of the tumor tissues examined. Therefore, no chromosomal translocations were evident with the Pol
probe we used.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
for both undamaged and damaged DNA, no evidence has been provided thus far to indicate its relevance in human cancer. The present study is the first documentation that Pol
is overexpressed in malignant human tissues compared with their matched normal tissue counterparts. Because Pol
is highly mutagenic when copying undamaged DNA, the elevated Pol
expression might cause an increased spontaneous mutation rate. In addition, the ability of Pol
to erroneously bypass an abasic site, N-2-acetylaminofluorene-adduct and 8-oxoguanine, implicates that mutagenesis induced by these DNA lesions may be greatly enhanced. Pol
may thus contribute to tumorigenesis by accelerating the accumulation of both spontaneous and DNA damage-triggered mutations. Moreover, elevated Pol
expression in the majority of NSCLCs, irrespective of their stages, suggests its possible involvement in both the initiation and progression of tumors.
Using the same matched specimens of NSCLC, we have recently shown that the human Rev3 gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of Pol
, is not overexpressed in tumors (15)
. Whereas human Rev3 appears to be involved in UV-induced mutagenesis (14)
, its biochemical properties for undamaged and damaged DNA have not been defined. In addition, we have shown in the present study that the expression of Pol
is not altered in these lung cancer cells, indicating that the elevated Pol
expression does not simply reflect some global alteration associated with tumorigenesis but is specific for lung cancer. The lack of Rev3 and Pol
overexpression in the same NSCLC indicates that the expression of these polymerases is differentially regulated. Their potential roles in tumorigenesis may differ depending on the type, origin, and tissue specificity of cancers.
The most important risk factor for lung cancer is tobacco smoking. Among the many constituents found in tobacco smoke, BaP is the most potent carcinogen known (16
, 17)
. In E. coli, the induction of -1 frameshift mutations by a BaP adduct in one particular template sequence of 5'-GGGBaP-3' was shown to require DinB (18)
. In contrast, human Pol
, the homologue of E. coli DinB, was reported to bypass a different BaP adduct in a relatively error-free manner under in vitro conditions (13)
. Although additional studies are required to reveal the biochemical properties of Pol
, it is possible that error-free or error-prone bypass of BaP adducts by Pol
may depend on the type of adducts and the sequence context. It remains an interesting issue as to whether elevated Pol
expression may be relevant to a smoking-associated increase of lung cancer incidence. In any case, the mutagenic properties of Pol
for several other types of DNA lesions, as well as its extreme inaccuracy when replicating undamaged DNA, strongly suggest that its elevated expression may result in enhanced mutagenesis, thereby contributing to tumorigenesis.
It is unclear what causes the up-regulation of Pol
expression in such a high percentage of lung tumors and in some nontumorous tissues. Pol
is normally expressed at low levels in most tissues except for the testis (9
, 10)
. Our data indicate that the enhanced Pol
expression is not attributable to its gene amplification. One possibility for the elevated Pol
transcription is its translocation to the vicinity of an actively transcribed gene locus. With the Pol
probe used, however, we could not detect apparent gene rearrangements within the Pol
locus, although the possibility that translocations might occur in the 5' or 3' flanking region cannot be excluded. A more likely possibility is that Pol
gene expression may be under the control of certain transcription factors whose expressions are dysregulated during the course of neoplastic transformation. An intriguing possibility is that Pol
transcription might be directly or indirectly regulated by the tumor suppressor p53, which is mutated in
60% of the lung cancers, or by the products of the Myc family of oncogenes, which are frequently amplified and overexpressed in tumors.
Deficiency in DNA repair genes is associated with high susceptibility to cancer. In this regard, DNA repair genes are tumor suppressors. The highly mutagenic properties of Pol
and its elevated expression in tumor tissues as revealed in the present study collectively suggest that Pol
could act as an oncogene. Future studies are required to determine the function of Pol
in vivo, in particular its role in tumorigenesis. It remains to be examined whether other members of the recently identified lesion-bypassing DNA polymerases (1, 2, 3)
might also be overexpressed in human malignancies.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture and Technology in Japan. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, Division of Pathology, 666-2 Nitona, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8717, Japan. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; BaP, benzo(a)pyrene; Pol, DNA polymerase. ![]()
Received 3/28/01. Accepted 5/24/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. Nature (Lond.), 399: 700-704, 1999.[Medline]
. Genes Dev., 14: 1589-1594, 2000.
synthesizes DNA with extraordinary low fidelity. Nucleic Acids Res., 28: 4147-4156, 2000.
, the product of the human DINB gene. J. Biol. Chem., 275: 39678-39684, 2000.
: evidence for the requirement for the dinB gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83: 3904-3908, 1986.
in vitro. Nucleic Acids Res., 28: 4138-4146, 2000.
. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 6876-6880, 1998.
catalytic subunit (Rev3) gene is ubiquitously expressed in normal and malignant human tissues. Int. J. Oncol., 18: 97-103, 2001.[Medline]
-dihydroxy-9
, 10
-epoxy-7,8,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[a]pyrene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 75: 5358-5361, 1978.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L. S. Waters, B. K. Minesinger, M. E. Wiltrout, S. D'Souza, R. V. Woodruff, and G. C. Walker Eukaryotic Translesion Polymerases and Their Roles and Regulation in DNA Damage Tolerance Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., March 1, 2009; 73(1): 134 - 154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Loeb, J. H. Bielas, R. A. Beckman, and I. W. Bodmer Cancers Exhibit a Mutator Phenotype: Clinical Implications Cancer Res., May 15, 2008; 68(10): 3551 - 3557. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Lin, J. Gu, C. Lu, M. R. Spitz, and X. Wu Expression of telomere-associated genes as prognostic markers for overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Cancer Res., October 1, 2006; 12(19): 5720 - 5725. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. D. Kennedy and A. D. D'Andrea DNA Repair Pathways in Clinical Practice: Lessons From Pediatric Cancer Susceptibility Syndromes J. Clin. Oncol., August 10, 2006; 24(23): 3799 - 3808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-Y. Choi, K. C. Angel, and F. P. Guengerich Translesion Synthesis across Bulky N2-Alkyl Guanine DNA Adducts by Human DNA Polymerase {kappa} J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21062 - 21072. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Ukai, T. Maruyama, S. Mochizuki, R. Ouchida, K. Masuda, K. Kawamura, M. Tagawa, K. Kinoshita, A. Sakamoto, T. Tokuhisa, et al. Role of DNA polymerase {theta} in tolerance of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage in mouse B cells Genes Cells, February 1, 2006; 11(2): 111 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Bavoux, A. M. Leopoldino, V. Bergoglio, J. O-Wang, T. Ogi, A. Bieth, J.-G. Judde, S. D. J. Pena, M.-F. Poupon, T. Helleday, et al. Up-Regulation of the Error-Prone DNA Polymerase {kappa} Promotes Pleiotropic Genetic Alterations and Tumorigenesis Cancer Res., January 1, 2005; 65(1): 325 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Yang, Z. Chen, Y. Liu, R. J. Hickey, and L. H. Malkas Altered DNA Polymerase {iota} Expression in Breast Cancer Cells Leads to a Reduction in DNA Replication Fidelity and a Higher Rate of Mutagenesis Cancer Res., August 15, 2004; 64(16): 5597 - 5607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Besaratinia and G. P. Pfeifer Enhancement of the Mutagenicity of Benzo(a)pyrene Diol Epoxide by a Nonmutagenic Dose of Ultraviolet A Radiation Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 63(24): 8708 - 8716. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Okada, E. Sonoda, Y. M. Yamashita, S. Koyoshi, S. Tateishi, M. Yamaizumi, M. Takata, O. Ogawa, and S. Takeda Involvement of Vertebrate Polkappa in Rad18-independent Postreplication Repair of UV Damage J. Biol. Chem., December 6, 2002; 277(50): 48690 - 48695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Ogi, Y. Shinkai, K. Tanaka, and H. Ohmori Polkappa protects mammalian cells against the lethal and mutagenic effects of benzo[a]pyrene PNAS, November 26, 2002; 99(24): 15548 - 15553. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Bergoglio, C. Bavoux, V. Verbiest, J.-S. Hoffmann, and C. Cazaux Localisation of human DNA polymerase {kappa} to replication foci J. Cell Sci., January 12, 2002; 115(23): 4413 - 4418. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |