| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Genetics Department, Medicine Branch, Division of Clinical Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [D. H. L., M. P. M., P. D. A.], and Departments of Cancer Genetics [D. S. C.], Immunology [D. H. L.], and Molecular and Cellular Biology [K. W. G.], Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York 14263
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Coexpression of SCL and LMO1 leads to a number of consistent abnormalities in the developing thymus before the onset of a clinically detectable malignancy (6 , 11) . Paradoxically, thymi from young SCL/LMO1 double transgenic mice aged 45 weeks are reduced in size and have a >3-fold reduction in the number of total thymocytes. This reduction is attributable, at least in part, to an increase in the number of apoptotic CD4+/CD8+ cells (6 , 11) . There is a prominent reduction in CD4+/CD8+ cells and a small absolute increase in the number of immature CD4-/CD8- cells. At the same time, expansion of an oligoclonal population of cells with clonal TCRß gene rearrangements can be detected. However, this oligoclonal population of cells is not frankly malignant, as evidenced by their failure to generate tumors when injected into immunodeficient nude mice (6) . The rate at which malignancies develop in SCL/LMO1 mice, along with the aforementioned failure of thymocytes from 45 week-old mice to produce tumors in immunodeficient mice, suggests that additional genetic events are likely to be required before SCL/LMO1 thymocytes become fully malignant. One hypothesis consistent with these observations is that activation of both SCL and LMO1 in the developing thymus leads to expansion of a relatively limited number of clones, one of which undergoes additional mutation(s) and becomes fully malignant.
scid mice (12) are immunodeficient because of their inability to effectively recombine antigen receptor genes; the molecular basis for this inability is caused by a mutation in the gene coding for DNAPKcs (13) . This inability leads to a block in thymocyte development at the CD4+/CD8+ stage, because of a lack of a functional TCRß gene rearrangement, a process that is required for thymocytes to progress to the CD4+/CD8+ stage. However, the inability of scid mice to rearrange antigen receptor genes, although severe, is not complete, as evidenced by the appearance of rare, "leaky" scid lymphocytes with functional rearrangements of TCR or immunoglobulin genes (14) . To determine whether the T-lymphocyte developmental block present in scid thymocytes would protect mice from the leukemogenic effect of SCL and LMO1 transgenes, we crossed SCL and LMO1 transgenes onto a homozygous scid background.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test with one degree of freedom. Animals
were maintained under standard conditions according to institutional
animal care and use guidelines.
Nucleic Acid Manipulations.
Genomic DNA isolation and Southern blots were performed as described
previously (7)
. Probes used in this study included a
1.2-kb HindIII-XbaI human SCL cDNA
fragment (67HX, Ref. 7
), a PCR-amplified human
LMO1 cDNA fragment (nucleotides 544957 of GenBank
accession no. M26682), PCR-amplified murine pre-T
(nucleotides
218622 of GenBank accession no. NM 011195), and TCR J
1, Cß2,
and C
(all gifts of Dr. Ilan Kirsch, National Cancer Institute).
Sample Isolation and Immunophenotype.
Thymus and spleen or tumor masses were removed from mice and placed on
ice in RPMI 1640 containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 5 µg/ml
penicillin, and 5 µg/ml streptomycin. Single cell suspensions were
made using a loose fitting ground glass homogenizer. Debris was removed
by gravity sedimentation, and the single cell suspension was used for
subsequent studies. Cells were immunophenotyped using conjugated
monoclonal antibodies and standard techniques as described previously
(6)
. The conjugates used were CD4 FITC, CD8 R-PE, CD25
R-PE, CD44 FITC, TCR
/ß R-PE (all from Caltag, Burlingame, CA),
IgM FITC (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), and CD45 R-PE (Life
Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD).
Analysis of TCRß Gene Rearrangements.
TCR gene rearrangements were assayed by Southern blot
hybridization to TCR C
, Cß2, or J
1 probes as described
(6)
. For a subset of samples, TCRß gene rearrangements
were amplified for sequence analysis using a modification of a
previously published protocol (17)
. First strand cDNA was
synthesized from 1 µg of total RNA using Superscript II reverse
transcriptase (Life Technologies, Inc.); the quality of the cDNA was
assessed by amplification of ß-actin, using sense
(5'-GTGGGCCGCTCTAGGCACCAA-3') and antisense
(5'-CTCTTTGATGTCACGCACGATTTC-3') primers. TCRß mRNA was
amplified using a degenerate Vß region primer
(5'-TAAGCGGCCGCATGSLYTGGTAYWXXCAG-3'; S = G or T,
L = A, G, or T, Y = C or T, W = A or C, X = A or G) and a Cß primer
(5'-CCCACCAGCTCAGCTCCACGTGG-3'), the sequence of which is identical for
both Cß1 and Cß2. The cycling parameters were 40 cycles of 94°C
for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72°C for 1 min, followed by a
terminal extension of 10 min at 72°C. The PCR products were gel
purified and subcloned into pGEM T-Easy (Promega, Madison WI).
Individual plasmid clones were isolated for sequence analysis.
| Results and Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
SCL/LMO1/scid Mice Show Clonal TCRß Gene
Rearrangements.
Interestingly, all SCL/LMO1/scid tumor
samples (n = 11) that were analyzed by
Southern blot showed clonal or oligoclonal TCRß gene rearrangements
and, in at least 8 of the 11 cases, biallelic TCRß gene
rearrangements (Fig. 2)
. We used a reverse transcriptase-PCR approach to sequence the TCRß
coding junctions from six samples (Table 1)
. The TCRß PCR products were subcloned into plasmid vectors for
sequence analysis. In five of the six cases, we recovered the same
unique rearrangement from multiple plasmid subclones; however, in
sample 58/4, we recovered nine different rearrangements, although the
Southern blot for this sample showed only two clear rearranged
fragments. The V(D)J rearrangements that were observed in only a single
plasmid subclone from tumor 58/4 may have been derived by ongoing
rearrangements of a parental clone and/or contaminating nonmalignant T
cells. In sum, 14 unique rearrangements were sequenced; all 14 were in
frame. As reported previously for antigen receptor coding junctions
from scid mice (18
, 19)
, these junctions
typically had P rather than N region nucleotide additions, some of
which were exceptionally long (nine nucleotides). However, in contrast
to other reports (19)
, we did not see abnormally large
nucleotide deletions at the coding junctions; this may be attributable
to a biological selection for cells that had undergone an in-frame,
functional TCRß rearrangement (see below). TCR rearrangement by
inversion has been thought to be uncommon in scid
thymocytes; however, we recovered a sample (62/1) that had rearranged
TCRß V14S1 and J1S5 by inversion. Two samples (from mice 58/4 and
70/1) had abnormal coding junctions that included J region heptameter
signal sequence; one of these (58/4) joined a known J region heptameter
sequence to V coding sequences similar to hybrid junctions described
previously for scid mice (20)
.
|
|
1 probe revealed only germline TCR
bands of the
expected intensity (data not shown), indicating that there were no
clonal TCR
rearrangements and suggesting that there were no clonal
TCR
rearrangements, because a TCR
rearrangement would delete
TCRJ
1 sequences. Moreover, we were unable to detect expression of
TCR
mRNA in these tumor samples. However, all six
SCL/LMO1/scid tumor samples assayed
expressed pre-T
mRNA (data not shown).
Clonal Expansion of Thymocytes in Young
SCL/LMO1/scid Mice.
Thymocytes were harvested from
SCL/LMO1/scid,
SCL/scid, LMO1/scid, and
scid mice at 4 and 12 weeks of age. In contrast to thymi
from scid mice, which are typically atretic and consist of
>85% DN cells, thymi from
SCL/LMO1/scid mice invariably showed
an increase in cellularity, a relative increase in CD4+CD8+ cells, a
relative decrease in DN cells (Fig. 3)
, and oligoclonal TCRß gene rearrangements at both 12 and 4 weeks of
age (Fig. 2, C and D)
. Thymocytes from
LMO1/scid mice often, but not invariably, showed
a similar increase in CD8+ SP and CD4+8+ CD4+CD8+ cells, a decrease in
DN cells, and oligoclonal TCRß gene rearrangements at 4 or 12 weeks.
Although thymocytes harvested from SCL/scid mice
at 4 weeks of age were indistinguishable from scid
thymocytes, thymocytes from two of five SCL/scid
mice also showed an increase in CD48+ and CD4+8+ cells and clonal
TCRß gene rearrangements at 12 weeks of age. These findings stand in
contrast with our prior studies (6)
on thymocytes from
clinically healthy, non-scid SCL and LMO1
transgenic mice. In those studies, SCL transgenic mice did
not display T-cell abnormalities in terms of immunophenotype or
clonality at ages 412 weeks; LMO1 transgenic mice also
failed to show abnormalities in immunophenotype or clonality at 4 weeks
of age, and only rarely (one of seven) showed evidence of clonal
predominance at 12 weeks of age (6)
. A potential
explanation for this difference is that these abnormalities (clonal
predominance and increased number of DN thymocytes) might be masked by
a population of normal, polyclonal thymocytes in the
non-scid mouse that are not present in the
thymocyte-deficient scid mouse.
|
In this study, we have demonstrated that the onset of leukemia is significantly delayed in SCL/LMO1/scid mice compared with SCL/LMO1/wt mice. In fact, 3 of 20 SCL/LMO1/scid mice survived >1 year, whereas only 1 of >100 SCL/LMO1 mice studied in our prior studies had survived for as long as 1 year without evidence of leukemia/lymphoma (6 , 7) .4 Four groups have crossed p53-deficient mice, which are prone to developing B- and T-cell malignancies, with either scid (21, 22, 23) or RAG1- or RAG2-deficient mice (24 , 25) . In light of our results, it is somewhat surprising that these studies have generally shown that the inability to rearrange TCR genes does not delay the onset of disease and, in some cases, actually seems to accelerate the onset of T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (23, 24, 25) . These differences suggest that the mechanism(s) underlying malignant transformation may be different between p53-/-/scid and SCL/LMO1/scid mice. In the case of p53-deficient scid mice, it has been proposed that "broken" DNA ends, which are usually eliminated via a p53-dependent process, persist and serve as a potential source for oncogenic chromosomal translocations. However, in the case of SCL/LMO1/scid mice, the biological equivalent of a chromosomal translocation (i.e., a mutation that leads to inappropriate activation of SCL and LMO1) is present in the germ line of the transgenic mice. The insertion of SCL and LMO1 mutations in the mouse germ line serves to bypass the usual mechanism (chromosomal translocation joining SCL or LMO1 with TCR genes) used to activate SCL and LMO1. Whereas it is likely that SCL and LMO1 exert their leukemogenic effect, at least in part, through a functional inactivation of the E-proteins E2A and HEB (6 , 7 , 11) , the downstream targets for chromosomal translocations in p53-deficient scid mice have not been identified.
The observation that all of the
SCL/LMO1/scid tumors analyzed showed
in-frame clonal (or oligoclonal) TCRß gene rearrangements was
unexpected, because the vast majority of scid thymocytes do
not rearrange TCR genes. This finding suggests that only the rare
scid thymocyte which undergoes an in-frame TCRß gene
rearrangement is able to develop to the point at which it becomes
susceptible to the oncogenic effect of the SCL and
LMO1 transgenes. The observation that most (at least 8 of
11) of the tumors had both TCRß alleles rearranged (Fig. 2
and data
not shown) suggests that the malignant scid thymocytes are
not necessarily impaired in the ability to rearrange TCRß but rather
in the ability to generate in-frame TCRß rearrangements containing
functional CDR3 coding sequences.
It would seem likely that TCRß proteins from the
SCL/LMO1/scid tumor cells pair with
pre-T
instead of TCR
, because we did not detect evidence of
either TCR
mRNA expression or clonal TCR
rearrangements. The
observation that pre-T
mRNA was expressed, in light of a recent
report (11)
showing the combination of SCL and
LMO1 inhibits pre-T
mRNA production, presents an apparent
paradox. However, it is possible that the lack of effective TCR
recombination leads to a selection for relatively rare cells with
TCRß and pre-T
expression as an alternative to TCR
/ß cells.
The combination of SCL and LMO1 transgenes
provides a mouse model of T-ALL that is likely to be relevant to the
human condition, because SCL and LMO1 (or the
closely related LMO2) are frequently activated in the
leukemic cells of patients with T-ALL. This study demonstrates that the
rare scid thymocyte with an in-frame TCRß gene
rearrangement is a preferred target for the oncogenic effect of
SCL and LMO1 and that the scid defect
offers a relative protection against the oncogenic action of these two
genes. These results provide a potential explanation for the clinical
observation that SCL gene rearrangements are restricted to
T-ALL samples of the
/ß lineage (26
, 27)
, as opposed
to the
/
lineage, and support the hypothesis that in-frame TCRß
gene rearrangements are required for the oncogenic effect of
SCL and LMO1.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported in part by grants from the National
Cancer Institute to P. D. A. while he was at Roswell Park Cancer
Institute. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should addressed,
at National Cancer Institute, Division of Clinical Sciences, Advanced
Technology Center, 8717 Grovemont Circle, Gaithersburg, MD 20877.
Phone: (301) 435-5005; Fax: (301) 402-3134; E-mail: aplanp{at}mail.nih.gov ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: SCL,
SCL/tal; TCR, T-cell receptor; T-ALL, T-cell acute
lymphoblastic leukemia; wt, wild type; scid, severe
combined immunodeficient; DN, CD4-CD8-. ![]()
4 D. S. Chervinsky and P. D. Aplan, unpublished
data. ![]()
Received 6/20/01. Accepted 7/18/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
.. EMBO J., 15: 5160-5166, 1996.[Medline]
chain expression.. Nature Immunology, 1: 138-144, 2000.[Medline]
/ß lineage: T cell receptor
gene deletion mechanism affects multiple genes.. J. Exp. Med., 177: 965-977, 1993.
ß lineage.. Blood, 80: 1511-1520, 1992.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. R. Gothert, R. L. Brake, M. Smeets, U. Duhrsen, C. G. Begley, and D. J. Izon NOTCH1 pathway activation is an early hallmark of SCL T leukemogenesis Blood, November 15, 2007; 110(10): 3753 - 3762. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fischer, G. Mann, M. Konrad, M. Metzler, G. Ebetsberger, N. Jones, B. Nadel, O. Bodamer, O. A. Haas, K. Schmitt, et al. Screening for leukemia- and clone-specific markers at birth in children with T-cell precursor ALL suggests a predominantly postnatal origin Blood, October 15, 2007; 110(8): 3036 - 3038. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fasseu, P. D. Aplan, M. Chopin, N. Boissel, J.-C. Bories, J. Soulier, H. von Boehmer, F. Sigaux, and A. Regnault p16INK4A tumor suppressor gene expression and CD3{epsilon} deficiency but not pre-TCR deficiency inhibit TAL1-linked T-lineage leukemogenesis Blood, October 1, 2007; 110(7): 2610 - 2619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-W. Lin, R. A. Nichols, J. J. Letterio, and P. D. Aplan Notch1 mutations are important for leukemic transformation in murine models of precursor-T leukemia/lymphoma Blood, March 15, 2006; 107(6): 2540 - 2543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Vaillant, K. Blyth, L. Andrew, J. C. Neil, and E. R. Cameron Enforced Expression of Runx2 Perturbs T Cell Development at a Stage Coincident with {beta}-Selection J. Immunol., September 15, 2002; 169(6): 2866 - 2874. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |