| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Department of Surgery, Section of Urology [M. G. R., M. G. S., C. J. V., J. R-D., M. A. R., M. L. D.], Cellular and Molecular Biology Graduate Program [J. R-D.], Department of Pathology [M. A. R.], and the University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center [M. G. R., M. G. S., C. J. V., J. R-D., M. A. R., M. L. D.], University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0944
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
, ß, and
catenin that is necessary
for the adhesive function of E-cadherin (11
, 14, 15, 16, 17)
.
Studies from our laboratory using cell culture and in vivo
models have demonstrated the role of E-cadherin-dependent aggregation
in prostate and mammary epithelial survival. We have also demonstrated
that the posttranslational cleavage of the native
E-cad120 results in a novel membrane-bound
Mr 97,000 fragment
(E-cad97) in cells destined to undergo apoptosis
(18)
. This cleavage effectively removes the ß-catenin
binding domain, rendering the E-cadherin molecule functionless. This
inactivating truncation of E-cadherin may then represent a novel
mechanism by which E-cadherin function is abrogated in human prostate
cancer. In this study, we evaluated whether this truncation occurs in
human prostate tissue with subsequent loss of the ß-catenin binding
domain and to determine whether E-cadherin truncation relates to
clinical prostate cancer progression. | Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Protein Preparation and Western Blot Analysis.
To prepare protein lysates from procured human tissue, the samples were
homogenized and allowed to lyse for 1 h (on ice) in protein lysis
buffer [50 mM Tris (pH 7.5), 120 mM NaCl, and
0.5% NP40] in combination with the following protease inhibitors: 40
µM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 50 µg/ml leupeptin,
50 µg/ml aprotinin, and 200 µM orthovanidate. Lysates
were centrifuged, and the supernatants were collected and quantitated
in triplicate in a 96-well microtiter Bradford assay. All experimental
samples were quantitated on the same microtiter plate against the same
BSA standard curve. The absorbance was read using a dual mode (test
filter at 595 nm and reference filter at 405 nm on a Dynatech
Laboratories MRX Microplate reader using End Point Program version
1.1). Curve fitting was done using a linear power fit with tails.
Protein (150 µg) from each tumor and normal pair was loaded and
separated on 6% Tris/Glycine precast NOVEX gels and analyzed using the
NOVEX and enhanced chemiluminescence (Amersham) detection systems as
described previously (19)
.
| Bradford Assay for Microtiter Plate |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Antibodies.
To detect the E-cad120 and
E-cad97 forms of human E-cad, the HECD-1
monoclonal antibody (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.), which was raised
against the extracellular domain of E-cad, was used. The E-cad
cytoplasmic antibody 4A2 was a gift from Dr. Margaret Wheelock
(University of Toledo, Toledo, OH). For ß-catenin
immunoprecipitations and Western blots, the CAT-5H10 antibody (Zymed
Laboratories, Inc.) was used. The appropriate horseradish
peroxidase-conjugated antimouse and antirat secondary antibody was,
respectively, obtained from Amersco and Jackson ImmunoResearch
Laboratories.
Immunoprecipitation Experiments.
The case-matched tumor and normal tissue lysates were prepared and
quantitated as described above. For the immunoprecipitation reactions,
the above protein lysis buffer was used. The lysates were precleared
with the protein G-Sepharose beads (Zymed Laboratories, Inc.) before
the immunoprecipitation reactions, and beads were diluted with an equal
volume of Tris buffered saline (0.1% Tween 20, pH 7.6)/2.5%
milk before use. After preclearing, 500 µg of protein were equalized
to 500 µl with the protein lysis buffer. Ten micrograms of
ß-catenin primary antibody were added and rotated at 4°C overnight.
Protein G-conjugated Sepharose beads (120 µl blocked) were added and
allowed to mix 90 min at 4°C. The beads were pelleted and washed four
times with 500 µl of the protein lysis buffer. Thirty µl of
twice reducing sample buffer was added to each pellet, and the
samples were heated at 100°C for 5 min and separated using 6%
Tris/Glycine precast NOVEX acrylamide gels.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Results from Western blot analysis of the 18 matched normal tumor pairs
are shown in Fig. 1
. In all of the tumor samples there is significant accumulation of
E-cad97. In the normal specimens, 6 samples were
devoid of the truncated band whereas the remaining 12 samples
exhibited, in most cases, moderate accumulation of
E-cad97. To further characterize this apparent
increase in E-cad97 in the tumor relative to its
case matched normal, densitometry was performed to quantitate band
intensity. Then, the fraction of truncated E-cadherin was determined
for both the tumor and normal samples for each patient. The net
difference between the ratio of
E-cad97:E-cad120 in the
tumor relative to its case-controlled normal emphasizes a relative
increase of E-cad97 in the cancerous phenotype as
graphically illustrated in Fig. 2
. The actual densitometric data from individual specimens and the
differences in ratios between tumor tissue and matched normal tissue
controls are given in Table 1
. In only four patients was the ratio of
E-cad97:E-cad120 greater in
the normal tissue as compared with its case-matched tumor. In the
remaining 14 patients, there is an increase in the
E-cad97:E-cad120 ratio in
tumor aspect of the prostate gland compared with case-matched normal.
The mean ratio of
E-cad97:E-cad120 for the
normal group was 0.50 and for the tumor was 0.76. For the 18 patients,
distribution of the
E-cad97:E-cad120 ratio was
not normal in nature, and, therefore, a nonparametric analysis was
performed. The Wilcoxon matched pairs test established a significant
difference between the
E-cad97:E-cad120 ratio in
the tumor relative to its matched normal, P = 0.035 (Fig. 2)
.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The aforementioned studies have examined E-cadherin expression by immunohistochemical analysis of processed tissue sections. However, immunohistochemistry using the HECD-1 antibody cannot discriminate between the full-length E-cad120 and truncated E-cad97. We demonstrate in this study evidence that the cleavage of E-cadherin in prostate tissue samples is easily and clearly detectable by Western blot and that the cleavage of E-cad120 effectively removes the ß-catenin binding domain. Removal of the ß-catenin binding domain inactivates E-cadherin, rendering it incapable of participating in intercellular adhesion. On the basis of our coimmunoprecipitation data, which demonstrates the absence of truncated E-cad97 in the ß-catenin functional complex, we believe that the presence of E-cad97 then is indicative of ineffectual E-cadherin.
When the 18 prostatectomy specimens were analyzed with Western blot, there was a variable but significant difference between the case-matched tumor and normal specimens with respect to the relative amount of cleaved E-cadherin. Wilcoxon matched pairs analysis confirms a relative increase in the truncation in the tumor as compared with its normal. These results are based on the direct comparison between normal and cancer tissue from the same specimen eliminating potential confounding effects of comparing tumor and normal from different patients. Although equal amounts of lysate were loaded for each sample, the actual percentage of epithelium may vary depending on the relative amount of stroma present. We, therefore, calculated a ratio of E-cad97:E-cad120 to establish a value that is independent from the epithelial and stromal distribution.
A key determinant in tumor progression is the ability of cancer cells to survive and proliferate in the absence of extracellular contact. In tumors of epithelial origin, the loss of adhesion dependence may arise through alterations of E-cadherin-mediated pathways. This laboratory has previously demonstrated the role of E-cadherin-dependent aggregation in prostate and mammary epithelial survival and the correlation of E-cadherin truncation and inactivation in cells destined to undergo apoptosis (13 , 18) . Thus, the question arises, does the truncation and inactivation of E-cadherin correlate with apoptosis and the malignant phenotype of prostate carcinoma? There are two possible scenarios: because of the correlation between E-cadherin truncation and apoptosis, the accumulation of E-cad97 may reflect an increase in apoptotic index in prostate tumor cells. This is supported by one study that has demonstrated a positive correlation between apoptosis and an increasing malignant potential in prostate cancer (22) . In the second scenario, we postulate that the accumulation of E-cad97 truncation may reflect early apoptotic signaling events resulting from the breakdown of adhesive interactions. However, although these cells may be in a detached state they are unable to execute apoptosis because of downstream mutations or inactivating events. Therefore, the truncated species may be accumulating in tumor cells that are not undergoing apoptosis. Undoubtedly, further analysis that will delineate the apoptotic and proliferative indices will help answer these questions.
Our study has used frozen tissue that was histologically confirmed as either normal prostatic tissue or tumor to analyze E-cad processing on the protein level. We have described a functional aberration in E-cad as a consequence of cleavage with subsequent loss of the ß-catenin binding motif. As can be appreciated from the Western analysis of the 18 matched tumor normal pairs, there is a statistically significant increase in the ratio of the truncated E-cad97 to the native E-cad120 in the tumor relative to its case-matched normal control. The relative loss of ß-catenin binding domain in the tumor, as demonstrated by increased accumulation of E-cad97 that is not present in the functional complex with ß-catenin, provides an alternative mechanism for the loss of E-cadherin function.
It is prudent to restate that inactivation of E-cadherin in prostate cancer does result from prodigious allelic loss (7) . Disruption of E-cadherin transcription does represent one mechanism by which E-cadherin is inactivated in this disease (7, 8, 9) . Aberrant translational regulation and possibly posttranslational events have also been proposed as alternative mechanisms of E-cadherin dysfunction, but these possibilities have not previously been evaluated in clinical prostate cancer. Our findings indicate that the posttranslational truncation of E-cadherin is a novel and readably attainable end point for evaluating loss of E-cadherin function that is significantly associated with the malignant transformation of the human prostate.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by the National Cancer Institute
Specialized Programs of Research Excellence in Prostate Cancer Grants
P50 CA69568 and 1RO1 DK56137. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Box 0944, Room 6219 CGC, 1500 East Medical Center Drive,
Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0944. Phone: (734) 647-8121; Fax: (734) 647-9271;
E-mail: mday{at}umich.edu ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are:
E-cad120, Mr 120,000 E-cadherin;
E-cad97, Mr 97,000 E-cadherin. ![]()
Received 7/25/00. Accepted 11/27/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-catenin expression in prostate cancer: correlation with patient survival. Cancer Res., 57: 3189-3193, 1997.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Ortega, A. Moran, C. de Juan, C. Frias, S. Hernandez, J.-A. Lopez-Asenjo, A. Sanchez-Pernaute, A. Torres, P. Iniesta, and M. Benito Differential Wnt Pathway Gene Expression and E-Cadherin Truncation in Sporadic Colorectal Cancers with and without Microsatellite Instability Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2008; 14(4): 995 - 1001. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Gomez, A. de las Pozas, T. Reiner, K. Burnstein, and C. Perez-Stable Increased expression of cyclin B1 sensitizes prostate cancer cells to apoptosis induced by chemotherapy Mol. Cancer Ther., May 1, 2007; 6(5): 1534 - 1543. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Simian, A. Molinolo, and C. Lanari Involvement of Matrix Metalloproteinase Activity in Hormone-Induced Mammary Tumor Regression Am. J. Pathol., January 1, 2006; 168(1): 270 - 279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Dalrymple, L. Antony, Y. Xu, A. R. Uzgare, J. T. Arnold, J. Savaugeot, L. J. Sokoll, A. M. De Marzo, and J. T. Isaacs Role of Notch-1 and E-Cadherin in the Differential Response to Calcium in Culturing Normal versus Malignant Prostate Cells Cancer Res., October 15, 2005; 65(20): 9269 - 9279. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Foley, D. Hollywood, and M. Lawler Molecular pathology of prostate cancer: the key to identifying new biomarkers of disease Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2004; 11(3): 477 - 488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Chatterjee, Y. Bai, Z. Wang, S. Beach, S. Mott, R. Roy, C. Braastad, Y. Sun, A. Mukhopadhyay, B. B. Aggarwal, et al. RKIP Sensitizes Prostate and Breast Cancer Cells to Drug-induced Apoptosis J. Biol. Chem., April 23, 2004; 279(17): 17515 - 17523. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Platica, E. Ivan, J. F. Holland, A. Ionescu, S. Chen, J. Mandeli, P. D. Unger, and O. Platica A pituitary gene encodes a protein that produces differentiation of breast and prostate cancer cells PNAS, February 10, 2004; 101(6): 1560 - 1565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Kuefer, M. D. Hofer, J. E. Gschwend, K. J. Pienta, M. G. Sanda, A. M. Chinnaiyan, M. A. Rubin, and M. L. Day The Role of an 80 kDa Fragment of E-cadherin in the Metastatic Progression of Prostate Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2003; 9(17): 6447 - 6452. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Imai, A. Horiuchi, C. Wang, K. Oka, S. Ohira, T. Nikaido, and I. Konishi Hypoxia Attenuates the Expression of E-Cadherin via Up-Regulation of SNAIL in Ovarian Carcinoma Cells Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2003; 163(4): 1437 - 1447. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Fu, P. C. Smith, L. Zhang, M. A. Rubin, R. L. Dunn, Z. Yao, and E. T. Keller Effects of Raf Kinase Inhibitor Protein Expression on Suppression of Prostate Cancer Metastasis J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2003; 95(12): 878 - 889. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Rios-Doria, K. C. Day, R. Kuefer, M. G. Rashid, A. M. Chinnaiyan, M. A. Rubin, and M. L. Day The Role of Calpain in the Proteolytic Cleavage of E-cadherin in Prostate and Mammary Epithelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., January 3, 2003; 278(2): 1372 - 1379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Rosivatz, I. Becker, K. Specht, E. Fricke, B. Luber, R. Busch, H. Hofler, and K.-F. Becker Differential Expression of the Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Regulators Snail, SIP1, and Twist in Gastric Cancer Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2002; 161(5): 1881 - 1891. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |