
[Cancer Research 61, 647-653, January 15, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research
Molecular Biology and Genetics |
Cyclin E is the Only Cyclin-dependent Kinase 2-associated Cyclin that Predicts Metastasis and Survival in Early Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer1
Carsten Müller-Tidow2,
Ralf Metzger,
Katrin Kügler,
Sven Diederichs,
Gregory Idos,
Michael Thomas,
Barbara Dockhorn-Dworniczak,
Paul M. Schneider,
H. Phillip Koeffler,
Wolfgang E. Berdel and
Hubert Serve
Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology [C. M-T., K. K., S. D., M. T., W. E. B., H. S.], and Department of Pathology [B. D-D.], University of Münster, 48129 Münster, Germany; Department of Visceral and Vascular Surgery, University of Cologne, 50924 Cologne, Germany [R. M., P. M. S.]; and Division of Hematology/Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Research Institute/University of California at Los Angeles School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California 90048 [G. I., H. P. K.]
 |
ABSTRACT
|
|---|
Progression through G1-S transition and S phase of the cell
cycle is mediated by cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2), which interacts
with several cyclins. Two of these, cyclin E and cyclin A2 (also known
as cyclin A), are overexpressed in many cancers. Cyclin E2 and cyclin
A1 are recently discovered cdk2-interacting cyclins that are found in
malignant tumor cell lines and in acute myeloid leukemia, respectively.
Expression and prognostic role of these cyclins in solid tumors is
unknown. Here, we have analyzed expression and prognostic relevance of
the cdk2-associated cyclins in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Fresh-frozen biopsies (n = 70)
from completely resected tumors with stage I to IIIA NSCLC were
studied. Gene expression was analyzed by quantitative real-time reverse
transcription-PCR. Expression levels of cyclin E
(P = 0.04) and cyclin A2
(P = 0.004) were significantly higher in
the tumor samples than in normal controls. Cyclin A1,
cyclin A2, and cyclin E2 expression
levels did not have prognostic relevance for survival. The mean
survival time associated with low and high levels of cyclin
E was 69.4 and 47.2 months, respectively, which was
statistically significant (P = 0.03).
Differences in survival were particularly pronounced in stages I and
II. Cyclin E was also closely associated with the
development of distant metastasis (P = 0.01). Finally, we confirmed by immunohistochemistry analyses that
cyclin E mRNA expression was closely associated with
cyclin E protein expression. In conclusion, cyclin E is
a strong independent prognostic indicator in patients with early-stage
NSCLC, whereas cyclin E2, cyclin A1, and
cyclin A2 do not have a prognostic role in NSCLC.
 |
INTRODUCTION
|
|---|
Dysregulation of the cell cycle is a prerequisite for the
formation of most if not all malignant tumors (1)
. The
relevant mechanisms that drive the cell from the
G0/G1 phase into S phase
have been discovered in recent years (2
, 3)
. The
importance of G1-S progression in the formation
of tumors has been highlighted by a high incidence of aberrations in
involved genes in a wide variety of tumors (1)
. The
central gene that controls S phase entry is
RB.3
RB and its related family members p107 and
p130 are important for the control of DNA synthesis and S
phase progression (4)
. RB in its under-phosphorylated form
binds tightly to E2F, recruiting a repressor complex to responsive
genes by binding to E2F sites in their promoters. These repressive
effects are overcome during G1-S progression by
consecutive phosphorylation of RB at different sites by
cyclin-cdk complexes (5)
. During the
G1 phase, RB phosphorylation is
mediated by D-type cyclins complexed with cdk4 and cdk6. These
phosphorylations appear to be growth factor-dependent and constitute
the final messenger in signal transduction pathways originating from
transmembrane receptors. In addition, steroid hormones such as estrogen
have been shown to interact directly with D-type cyclins (6
, 7)
. After passing G1 phase, the cell
arrives at the G1-S checkpoint, which is
critically controlled by cdk2 that associates with E- and A-type
cyclins (8)
. Cyclin E-cdk2 complexes induce RB
phosphorylation at sites distinct from cyclin D (5)
.
Finally, complete phosphorylation of RB triggers the
initiation of S phase. Overexpression of cyclin D1,
cyclin E, and cyclin A have been demonstrated to
promote S phase entry (9
, 10)
. Physiologically, cyclin E
levels determine the time point when cells enter S phase (11
, 12)
, and activation of cyclin E appears to be a main
function of cyclin D1 (13)
. In addition, the
cyclin E promoter is transactivated by the E2F transcription factor,
and cyclin E protein is targeted for destruction by ubiquitination
(14
, 15)
.
The important role of cyclin E has also been demonstrated by
reports that cyclin E is overexpressed in several types of
cancer (16, 17, 18, 19)
. Immunohistochemistry studies demonstrated
that high levels of cyclin E and low levels of
p27 predicted a poor prognosis in young breast cancer
patients (12)
. In addition, cyclin E expression
in cancer is often deregulated with regard to the cell cycle
(20)
. In two recent papers, the expression of cyclin
E has been studied in lung cancer patients by immunohistochemistry
(21
, 22) . The findings obtained suggested that a high
labeling index for cyclin E protein might be associated with a poorer
prognosis for patients with early-stage NSCLC (21
, 22)
. However, there are no data regarding the important question
of whether this effect is confined to cyclin E, or whether
expression levels of other cdk2-associated cyclins are associated with
a poor prognosis in NSCLC as well.
Recently, a new mammalian cyclin, cyclin E2, has been cloned
that shows a high degree of homology to cyclin E (23
, 24)
. This cyclin was expressed in lung cancer cell lines but not
in their nontransformed counterparts (25)
. The unknown
importance of E-type cyclins in early stage NSCLC prompted us to study
the level of expression and the prognostic role of cyclin E and cyclin
E2 in early-stage NSCLC. Furthermore, A-type cyclins may drive cells
into S phase, and levels of cyclin A2 (formerly cyclin A) are
associated with the percentage of tumor cells in S phase
(26)
. Cyclin A1 is a recently cloned A-type cyclin that is
highly expressed in acute leukemias (27)
.
To study expression of the cdk2-interacting cyclins, we developed
real-time quantitative RT-PCR assays that are based on the 5' nuclease
assay (28
, 29)
. Quantitative real-time PCR allows for an
accurate quantitation of gene expression that is less error-prone and
much more accurate than immunohistochemistry. In addition, quantitative
RT-PCR can be performed on very small amounts of tumor tissue.
In this study, we demonstrate that expression of E-type and A-type
cyclins in NSCLC is independent of tumor stage and is not associated
with size or grade of the tumor. Overexpression of cyclin E
and cyclin A2, but neither cyclin E2 nor
cyclin A1, was found in a high percentage of tumor samples.
In addition, high expression levels of cyclin E were associated with
the subsequent development of metastasis and a poor prognosis. In
summary, we show that in stage I and II NSCLC, cyclin E
constitutes an important independent prognostic parameter for survival.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS
|
|---|
Tumor Specimens and Survival Data.
Primary tumor specimens were obtained at the time of initial surgery
for NSCLCs at a university hospital in Germany. Samples were
snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C. Only samples
from individuals with stages I to IIIA that were resected without
pathological evidence for remaining tumor (R0 resection) were
included into this study. In addition, patients who survived for <90
days after surgery were excluded. Patient characteristics are presented
in Table 1
. Patients with stage IIIA tumors received radiation therapy after
surgery. All patients were followed-up for a minimum period of 5 years.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 1 Patient characterization
Included into the study were patients with pathologically confirmed
R0 resection of NSCLC stage I to IIIA who survived for at least
90 days after surgery.
|
|
RNA Isolation and cDNA Preparation.
The tumor samples were checked for the percentage of tumor cells by
histology, and only tumor biopsies with at least 70% cancer cells were
used for subsequent analyses. Similarly, cancer-free control samples
were confirmed by histological examination. For RNA preparation,
samples were disrupted into small pieces, and RNA was isolated from
tumor samples using Trizol reagent (Life Technologies, Inc.). A total
of 1 µg of RNA from each sample was reverse-transcribed using an
oligo d(T) primer and MMLV reverse transcriptase according to
the protocol of the manufacturer (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). The cDNA
was diluted to give a total volume of 200 µl, and 5 µl of this
dilution was used for each PCR reaction. The quality of the cDNA was
confirmed by amplification of GAPDH (see below), and only samples with
consistent and strong amplification of GAPDH were included in
the final analyses.
Analyses of Gene Expression by Real-time Quantitative RT-PCR.
The quantitation of cyclin mRNA levels was carried out using a
real-time fluorescence detection method (28
, 30)
. The cDNA
was prepared as described above and amplified by PCR in the ABI Prism
7700 sequence detector (PE Biosystems, Foster City, CA). The
following primers and probes were used (all 5'to 3' direction, the
sequence in the middle indicates the probe): Cyclin E: CTC CAG GAA GAG
GAA GGC AA, FAM-CGT GAC CGT TTT TTT GCA GGA TCC-TAMRA, and TCG ATT TTG
GCC ATT TCT TCA; Cyclin E2: TGT TGG CCA CCT GTA TTA TCT GG, FAM-CAC TCA
TGT TGA GAC TTA ATC CCT AAT GTG GCA-TAMRA, ATC TGG AGA AAT CAC TTG TTC
CTA TTT C; Cyclin A2: AGC TGC CTT TCA TTT AGC ACT CTA C, FAM-TCA CGG
GAC AAA GCT GGC CTG AA-TAMRA, TTA AGA CTT TCC AGG GTA TAT CCA GTC; and
PCNA: ATC ATT ACA CTA AGG GCC GAA GAT AAC, FAM- CCT TGG CGC TAG TAT TTG
AAG CAC CAA ACC-TAMRA, TCA TTT CAT AGT CTG AAA CTT TCT CCT G. The
cyclin A1 and GAPDH primers and probes have been described previously
(29)
. Primer and probe combinations were positioned to
span an exon-exon junction. When genomic DNA was used as a template, no
bands were seen after PCR amplification. The probes were labeled at the
5' end with VIC (GAPDH probe) or with FAM (all others)
and at the 3' end with TAMRA, which served as a quencher. The 5'
to 3' nuclease activity of the Taq polymerase cleaved the probe and
released the fluorescent dyes (VIC or FAM), which were detected by the
laser detector of the sequence detector (29)
. After the
detection threshold was reached, the fluorescence signal was
proportional to the amount of PCR product generated. Initial template
concentration could be calculated from the cycle number when the amount
of PCR product passed a threshold set in the exponential phase of the
PCR reaction. Relative gene expression levels were calculated using
standard curves generated by serial dilutions of U937 cDNA. The
relative amounts of gene expression were calculated by using the
expression of GAPDH as an internal standard. At least two independent
analyses were performed for each sample and for each gene. Analyses of
gene expression data were performed without the knowledge of patient
data.
Statistical data analyses were performed using SPSS 9.0 and the
statistical tests indicated in "Results." The following parameters
were included into the Cox regression analysis for individuals with
stages I and II NSCLC: (a) cyclin E; (b)
cyclin E2; (c) cyclin A1; (d) cyclin A2,
(e) p53 mutation status; (f) sex; (g)
smoker/nonsmoker; (h) tumor diameter; (i)
histological subtype; (j) stage (I or II); (k)
tumor grade; and (l) patient age. A P < 0.05 was
considered as significant.
Immunohistochemistry.
Anti-cyclin E monoclonal antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA) was used
for immunohistochemical analysis. Frozen sections from corresponding
tumor material were cut at a thickness of 56 µm and mounted on
poly-L-lysine-coated glass slides and fixed in an ice-cold
methanol/aceton mix (1:1). Sections were digested with proteinase K
(0.1 µg/ml) in 1 M Tris-buffer (pH 7.5) at 37° for 5
min. Reaction was stopped in 70% ethanol, and slides were rinsed in
PBS. A 1:50 dilution of the primary antibody was applied for 45 min at
room temperature, and then a rabbit-antimouse (RPMI 1640, 1:30; 30 min
at room temperature; DAKO, Copenhagen, Denmark) and a mouse-antirabbit
phosphatase-anti-alkaline phosphatase complex (RPMI 1640, 1:100;
60 min at room temperature; Dako). Finally, the sections were rinsed in
destilled water for 10 min and counterstained with hematoxylin and
mounted in Kaysers glycerine gelatin. Omission of the primary
antibody served as negative control. Slides were examined at x100 and
x200 by an experienced pathologist, who was not informed of the
results obtained from mRNA measurements. They were judged as
"negative," "positive," or "strongly positive," depending
on the percentage of the cells showing a nuclear staining pattern. At
least five visual fields at x200 were examined on at least two slides
per section.
 |
RESULTS
|
|---|
Tumors from 70 patients with early NSCLC were surgically resected,
and patients with stage IIIA disease subsequently received radiation
therapy. This study included only patients with stages I to IIIA
disease who were resected without pathological evidence of remaining
tumor. Clinical characteristics are shown in Table 1
. Parts of the
surgically resected tumors were immediately shock-frozen and stored at
-70°C until analysis. All specimens were confirmed to contain a high
percentage of tumor cells (>70%). Lung tissue without histological
evidence of tumor infiltration was isolated from 12 of the individuals
to serve as a control. RNA preparation and reverse transcription were
carried out as described in "Material and Methods." Subsequently,
expression levels for the different cyclins and GAPDH were analyzed
using real-time quantitative RT-PCR. At least two independent analyses
of each cDNA sample were performed for each gene and comparisons of
these results showed a very high degree of reproducibility (Fig. 1A)
. For relative quantitation of gene expression, standard
curves with serial dilutions of cDNA were established (Fig. 1B)
. The amount of gene expression was standardized to
expression levels of the housekeeping gene GAPDH.

View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 1. Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses. A,
cDNA from patients and controls was subjected to two independent PCR
reactions in a SDS 7700 Sequence detection system. Fluorescent probes
were used to analyze the amount of the specific PCR product during each
cycle (see "Materials and Methods"). The cycle number where the
fluorescence reached the detection threshold was recorded
(CT-value). Shown are the
CT-values for two independent analyses of cyclin E
expression. In almost all cases, the degree of correlation between the
first and second analyses was very high. Only very few samples
amplified differently between the two experiments. These samples were
independently analyzed a third time. B, a standard curve
derived from serial (4-fold) dilutions of a tumor cell line cDNA (U937)
was used to calculate the actual concentration in the patient sample.
Each curve shows amplification of a standard sample. Duplicates of each
standard were run on each plate, and the overlapping curves represent
the duplicates. The determined amount of the gene of interest was then
divided by the amounts of GAPDH detected in the sample to standardize
for differences in reverse transcription efficiency. Relative gene
expression was calculated as the amount of target gene expression
(compared with standard cDNA)/the amount of GAPDH (compared with
standard cDNA).
|
|
Twelve lung tissue samples without evidence of tumor
infiltration were used as controls. The cutoff value for normal
versus elevated cyclin expression was set at the mean of
controls plus twice the SD (Table 2)
. Levels of cyclin mRNA of tumor samples and controls are shown in Fig. 2
. Interestingly, expression of cyclin E2 was lower in most
tumor samples than in controls, and none of the tumor samples reached
the cutoff value. For cyclin A1, one control and six tumor
samples were above the cutoff value. In contrast to the low expression
levels seen for cyclin A1 and cyclin E2, a large
fraction of patients presented with elevated levels of cyclin
E (41%, 29 of 70) and cyclin A2 (31%, 22 of 70).
Cyclin E levels did not correlate significantly with the
size of the tumor or the proliferating fraction of the tumor as
indicated by PCNA expression (Table 3)
. Cyclin A2 levels were significantly higher in tumor
samples than in controls (Fig. 2)
. In contrast with cyclin
E, a close association between cyclin A2 expression and
PCNA was noted (Table 3)
.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2 Expression levels of cyclins in NSCLC
The means and standard deviations of cyclin expression levels were
calculated for control and tumor samples.
|
|

View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 2. Cyclin expression in NSCLC and control lung tissue. Cyclin
expression in cancer-free lung tissue from 12 patients was used as a
control. The mean + 2 x SD of controls (Table 2)
was used to determine the cutoff value for overexpression. The
cutoff values are shown as dotted lines and indicated by
an arrow. For calculation of the cutoff value for cyclin
A1, the one control sample with high cyclin A1 expression was excluded.
Cyclin overexpression was detected in 41% (29 of 70) of tumors for
cyclin E, in 31% (22 of 70) for cyclin A2, in 9% (6 of 70) for cyclin
A1, and in 0% (0 of 70) for cyclin E2.
|
|
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 3 Correlation coefficients
This table shows the linear correlation coefficients between levels of
gene expression in the tumor samples (n = 70). Significant correlation coefficients are indicated with the
respective P. All other correlations were not significant.
|
|
Survival of patients was closely associated with the stage of the
disease. Those with stage I showed a mean survival of 77.7 months
(95%CI 68.487.0 months), and stages II and IIIA patients had a mean
survival of 63.9 months (95%CI 44.783.2 months), and 28.8 months
(95%CI 17.739.8 months), respectively (P < 0.0001). No significant association existed between the stage
of disease and expression levels of the various cyclins (data not
shown).
To analyze the relationship between cyclin expression and prognosis,
patients were grouped according to high and low expression. For
cyclin E and cyclin A2, the cutoff values as
defined in Table 2
were used. Concerning cyclin A1 and
cyclin E2, because few or none of the samples showed
increased expression, the tumor samples were split into two groups at
the median of the expression level.
Patients with low levels of cyclin E at diagnosis showed a
mean survival time of 71.7 months (95%CI 60.283.2 months), whereas
the mean survival time for patients with high cyclin E
levels was only 47.7 months (95%CI 37.657.8 months). This difference
was statistically significant (P = 0.03, log
rank test; Fig. 3A
). Differences in the expression levels of either
cyclin E2, cyclin A1, or cyclin A2 did
not predict survival (Fig. 3A)
. We further analyzed the
predictive role of low versus high cyclin E
expression in different stages of NSCLC. Strong predictive values of
cyclin E expression were detected for stage I (mean survival
59.0 versus 90.9 months) and stage II disease (mean survival
40.6 versus 74.8 months; Fig. 3B
). No significant
difference could be detected in stage IIIA patients (mean survival 30.3
versus 26.4 months).
Most patients with early-stage NSCLC died because of the subsequent
development of distant metastasis. Because all tumors were completely
resected, occult metastasis had to be present at the time of surgery.
We analyzed whether cyclin expression was directly associated with the
subsequent development of distant metastasis (Fig. 4)
. The percentage of all patients who developed distant metastasis was
37.1% (26 of 70). Fewer than 25% of patients with low cyclin
E levels (10 of 41) developed distant metastasis. However, 55%
(16 of 29) of patients with high cyclin E levels developed
distant metastasis (P = 0.01). In contrast to
the predictive value of cyclin E levels, no relationship was
found between the development of metastasis and expression levels for
cyclin E2 (P = 1.0) and
cyclin A1 (P = 0.8). The small
differences seen for cyclin A2 did not reach statistical
significance (P = 0.18; Fig. 4
).

View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 4. Overexpression of cyclin E is closely associated with
development of distant metastasis. Patients with low levels of cyclin E
infrequently developed distant metastasis (24%, 10 of 41). However,
the majority of patients with high levels of cyclin E subsequently
presented with distant metastasis (55%, 16 of 29). This difference was
statistically significant (P = 0.01,
Fishers exact test). No significant differences in the frequency of
development of metastasis occurred between low and high expression
levels of any of the other cyclins.
|
|
To confirm whether the cyclin E mRNA-levels measured by
real-time RT-PCR correlated with the expression of cyclin E
protein levels, we performed immunohistochemistry on tumors from 17
randomly selected patients. These tumor samples contained different
expression levels of cyclin E mRNA as judged by real-time
RT-PCR (Fig. 5)
. We found a strong association between cyclin E expression
in immunohistochemistry and the quantitative expression data obtained
by real-time RT-PCR (Fig. 6)
. The mean cyclin E mRNA expression levels of tumors without
immunohistochemistry staining (negative) was 2.52 ± 1.3
SD (n = 8), whereas mRNA expression of
positive tumors was 9.59 ± 5.7 SD
(n = 9). The differences in expression were
statistically highly significant (P = 0.01;
Mann-Whitney u-test).

View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 5. Analyses of cyclin E expression by immunohistochemistry.
To analyze whether cyclin E mRNA expression correlated with protein
expression, frozen sections were stained with anti-cyclin E antibody as
outlined in "Materials and Methods." A, strong
nuclear staining for cyclin E was seen in the tumor. B,
in contrast, no staining was detectable in sections from the tumor.
|
|

View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
|
Fig. 6. Close association between cyclin E mRNA and
protein levels. Seventeen randomly picked tumors were analyzed by
immunohistochemistry and regarded as "positive" or "negative."
The graph shows the quantitative mRNA values of positive
and negative samples. Also indicated are means and
standard deviations. The difference was statistically highly
significant (P = 0.01).
|
|
Cox regression analysis was used to determine the independent
prognostic value of E-type cyclins in early-stage NSCLC. The disease
stage at presentation is known to be the major determinant of survival
in NSCLC. Stage IIIA disease is characterized by the presence of
metastatic lymph nodes in the mediastinum. These patients already have
a far less favorable prognosis than those with stage I/II disease and
the likelihood of occult metastasis is high. Therefore, we limited the
Cox regression analysis to stages I and II patients
(n = 50), where the prognosis is difficult to
predict. Within this group, tumor grade (P = 0.01), disease stage (P = 0.02), and high
levels of cyclin E (P = 0.02)
emerged as independent determinants of subsequent tumor-related death.
Neither a patients sex, smoking habits, tumor size, histological
subtype, levels of expression of cyclin E2, cyclin
A1, cyclin A2, or PCNA, mutational status of
p53, or patient age at diagnosis were of prognostic
importance.
 |
DISCUSSION
|
|---|
The main findings of our study are as follows: (a) mRNA
levels of cyclin E and cyclin A2, but not
cyclin A1 or cyclin E2, are elevated in a large
fraction of patients with early-stage NSCLC; (b) expression
of cyclin A2 is associated with proliferation in NSCLC;
(c) levels of cyclin E do not correlate with
cellular proliferation in NSCLC; (d) elevated expression of
cyclin E is closely associated with the development of
distant metastasis; and (e) levels of cyclin E
expression constitute an independent prognostic parameter for survival
in early stage NSCLC.
To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that real-time
quantitative RT-PCR might be of clinical use for the prediction of
metastasis and survival of patients with solid tumors. Analyses of gene
expression levels can be performed at the mRNA as well as on the
protein level. The level of cyclin E protein, measured by
immunohistochemistry, has been studied previously in NSCLC (21
, 22)
. Analyses of expression levels by immunohistochemistry
reveal information about protein stability and the spatial organization
of its expression. On the other hand, immunohistochemistry usually
results in semiquantitative data only, and the reliability depends on
the antibody and detection system used and may be subject to bias.
Western blotting, another method to measure protein levels, does not
give any information about the cell type expressing the protein and is
rather difficult to perform on a large number of patient samples.
Measurements at the RNA level can overcome some of these obstacles. For
clinical specimens, analyses by RT-PCR provide a rapid way of analyzing
the presence or absence of specific transcripts. However, before the
advent of real-time PCR, the accurate measurement of the amount of
transcripts in the specimen was time-consuming and error prone. In our
study, we have used the 5' nuclease assay to determine quantitatively
the level of expression of cdk2-associated cyclins in NSCLC specimens.
Despite the convenience and accuracy of real-time PCR, several factors
have to be taken into account to avoid potential pitfalls that might
hamper the quality of the data. To minimize the problem of normal cell
contamination of the tumor sample, we only used specimens that
contained a high percentage (>70%) of tumor cells. To exclude
analysis of genomic DNA that might contaminate the RNA preparation, the
probes were designed to cover an exon-exon junction of the gene of
interest. Because pseudogenes might be present in genomic DNA, we
checked the samples for amplification in reverse transcription
reactions in the absence of reverse transcriptase. In addition, all
samples were quantitated according to a standard curve, which was run
on every PCR plate. Furthermore, the same standard samples were used
for each PCR plate to standardize results among different plates. All
samples were analyzed at least twice on independently prepared and
analyzed reaction plates. In our experience, this type of analysis
results in highly reproducible data with a high degree of correlation
of data points obtained at different occasions (Fig. 1A)
.
Because of the exponential nature of PCR, the minimum difference in
expression levels that can be detected by the 5' nuclease assay is
about 2-fold. In our analyses, we demonstrated that expression levels
of cyclins, and in particular cyclin E, vary in a wide
range. For example, high expressing samples can have more than
1000-fold higher expression than samples expressing low levels of
cyclin E. We could also demonstrate, that the cyclin
E mRNA levels measured in our assay correlated well with
immunohistochemical staining patterns of the cyclin E protein (Fig. 6)
.
The cell cycle is a basic cellular mechanism that controls fundamental
processes such as growth and proliferation as well as apoptosis
(31)
. A large body of data evidences the pivotal role of
the RB pathway in the G1-S transition and its
aberrations in tumor cells (1)
. Cdk2-containing complexes
are critically involved in phosphorylating RB at the
G1-S transition. Cyclin genes are often amplified
in cancers (32)
. Thus, elevated levels of cyclin
E are not surprising in malignant tumors. However, it is unclear
is whether cyclin E is merely reflecting the enhanced
proliferation of the transformed cells, or whether elevated levels of
cyclin E itself confer a more malignant phenotype.
Cyclin A2, the main partner for cdk2 during S phase, was
found to be elevated in a significant portion of the tumors. Its
expression correlated well with levels of PCNA, suggesting that
cyclin A2 expression was a consequence rather than a cause
of enhanced proliferation in these tumors. We also studied expression
and significance of the cdk2 partners cyclin A1 and
cyclin E2, two cdk2 partners that are much less studied.
Cyclin A1 is 60% identical to cyclin A2, and it
enhances the cdk2 kinase activity to phosphorylate RB
(33)
. Its expression is regulated differently than the
expression of cyclin A2 (34
, 35) . Under
physiological conditions, cyclin A1 is highly
expressed in testis, and it is essential for spermatogenesis (36
, 37)
. In malignant disease, cyclin A1 is highly
expressed in some leukemic blasts derived from myeloid lineages
(27
, 37)
. The homozygous deletion of cyclin A2
leads to embryonal lethality indicating that cyclin A1 does
not substitute for cyclin A2 (38)
. In the
current study, we found increased cyclin A1 expression in
six patient samples, whereas the majority of lung tumors expressed very
low levels of cyclin A1. These findings show that
cyclin A1 expression occurs in some solid tumors but in
general appears to be a rare event.
Cyclin E2 is a recently cloned homologue of cyclin
E and its expression was reported previously in several lung
cancer-derived cell lines (25)
. Our data show that
expression of cyclin E2 in primary NSCLC is very low, and it
is not associated with levels of either PCNA or cyclin E.
These findings indicate that functions of cyclin E2 in the cell cycle
obviously differ from those of cyclin E. In addition, its
low expression in primary tumors casts doubt onto a role for
this cyclin in the pathogenesis of NSCLC. The discrepancy between the
prominent expression found in cell lines with primary tumors needs
additional investigation.
Cyclin E was overexpressed in the majority of tumor samples
studied and closely associated with survival in early-stage NSCLC. Of
all of the cdk2-associated cyclins studied, cyclin E was the
only one to have prognostic relevance. Inasmuch as all tumors included
into our study were pathologically confirmed to be completely resected,
enhanced cellular proliferation by itself would not worsen the
prognosis of the patient. In addition, tumor size did not correlate
with levels of cyclin E in our study. Also, cyclin
E levels in our study and in a previous study (21)
did not correlate with levels of PCNA; and levels of cyclin
A2, which we show to be closely associated with cellular
proliferation, did not predict survival. It has been shown that cyclin
E expression in cancer cells can be unrelated to the phase of the cell
cycle (39)
. A possible explanation for the strong
prognostic value of cyclin E may be suggested by our finding
that elevated levels of cyclin E were closely associated
with the development of distant metastasis. How could cyclin
E be linked to metastasis? One possibility is that targets of
cyclin E-cdk2 complexes are involved in the loss of cellular adherence,
and the increased cellular mobility associated with mitosis strengthens
this point of view. Another possible explanation is conveyed by recent
findings that overexpression of cyclin E leads to increased
chromosome instability (40)
. High levels of cyclin E lead
to impaired S phase progression and the development of aneuploidy in
the cell population. This phenomenon was observed solely when
cyclin E, but not when cyclin A2 or cyclin
D1, were overexpressed. These findings in cell lines correspond
well with the unique prognostic role of cyclin E levels in
our study population. The induction of chromosomal instability by
deregulation of cyclin E might be an important mechanism in
the development of metastasis in early-stage NSCLC. To analyze this
possibility in more detail, we used comparative genomic hybridization
to examine overall genomic instability in high- and low-cyclin
E-expressing tumors. However, we did not detect significant
differences (data not shown). An alternative hypothesis might be that
cyclin E is simply an indicator gene and does not have
pathogenetic relevance. Even if this is the case, analyses of
cyclin E expression levels might be clinically useful as an
indicator for the likelihood of metastasis in NSCLC. This information
may help to choose patients who are most likely to profit from adjuvant
or neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic treatment strategies in the early
stages of the disease.
 |
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
|
|---|
We thank Silvia Klümpen and Annette Westermann for
excellent technical assistance.
 |
FOOTNOTES
|
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 Supported by grants from the Deutsche Krebshilfe
(10-1539-Mü1), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Mu 1328/2-1,
Se 600/2-2), the IMF-Program (Mü429926, Mü529905, and
SE119908) at the University of Münster, and the University of
California Tobacco Related Disease Program. This study is part of
Katrin Küglers M. D. thesis work. 
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at: Department of Medicine, Hematology and Oncology,
University of Münster, Domagkstr. 3, 48129 Münster,
Germany. Phone: 49-251-835-6229; Fax: 49-251-835-2673; E-mail: muellerc{at}unimuenster.de 
3 RB, retinoblastoma gene product; cdk,
cyclin-dependent kinase; NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; RT-PCR,
reverse transcription-PCR; GAPDH, glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate
dehydrogenase; TAMRA, 6-carboxytetramethylrhodamine; PCNA,
proliferating cell nuclear antigen. 
Received 3/24/00.
Accepted 11/ 8/00.
 |
REFERENCES
|
|---|
-
Sherr C. J. Cancer cell cycles. Science (Washington DC), 274: 1672-1677, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hatakeyama M., Weinberg R. A. The role of RB in cell cycle control. Prog. Cell Cycle Res., 1: 9-19, 1995.[Medline]
-
Planas-Silva M. D., Weinberg R. A. The restriction point and control of cell proliferation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 9: 768-772, 1997.[Medline]
-
Zhang H. S., Gavin M., Dahiya A., Postigo A. A., Ma D., Luo R. X., Harbour J. W., Dean D. C. Exit from G1 and S phase of the cell cycle is regulated by repressor complexes containing HDAC-Rb-hSWI/SNF and Rb-hSWI/SNF. Cell, 101: 79-89, 2000.[Medline]
-
Lundberg A. S., Weinberg R. A. Functional inactivation of the retinoblastoma protein requires sequential modification by at least two distinct cyclin-cdk complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 753-761, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zwijsen R. M. L., Buckle R. S., Hijmans E. M., Loomans C. J. M., Bernards R. Ligand-independent recruitment of steroid receptor coactivators to estrogen receptor by cyclin D1. Genes Dev., 12: 3488-3498, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Prall O. W., Rogan E. M., Musgrove E. A., Watts C. K., Sutherland R. L. c-Myc or cyclin D1 mimics estrogen effects on cyclin E-Cdk2 activation and cell cycle reentry. Mol. Cell. Biol., 18: 4499-4508, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Schulman B. A., Lindstrom D. L., Harlow E. Substrate recruitment to cyclin-dependent kinase 2 by a multipurpose docking site on cyclin A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 95: 10453-10458, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Resnitzky D., Gossen M., Bujard H., Reed S. I. Acceleration of the G1/S phase transition by expression of cyclins D1 and E with an inducible system. Mol. Cell. Biol., 14: 1669-1679, 1994.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Rosenberg A. R., Zindy F., Le Deist F., Mouly H., Metaneau P., Brechot C., Lamas E. Overexpression of human cyclin A advances entry into S phase. Oncogene, 10: 1501-1509, 1995.[Medline]
-
Dulic V., Lees E., Reed S. I. Association of a human cyclin E with a periodic G1-S phase protein kinase. Science (Washington DC), 257: 1958-1961, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Porter P. L., Malone K. E., Heagerty P. J., Alexander G. M., Gatti L. A., Firpo E. J., Daling J. R., Roberts J. M. Expression of the cell-cycle regulators p27Kip1 and cyclin E alone and in combination, correlate with survival in young breast cancer patients. Nat. Med., 3: 222-225, 1997.[Medline]
-
Geng Y., Whoriskey W., Park M. Y., Bronson R. T., Medema R. H., Li T., Weinberg R. A., Sicinski P. Rescue of cyclin D1 deficiency by knock-in cyclin E. Cell, 97: 767-777, 1999.[Medline]
-
Geng Y., Eaton E. N., Picon M., Roberts J. M., Lundberg A. S., Gifford A., Sardet C., Weinberg R. A. Regulation of cyclin E transcription by E2Fs and retinoblastoma protein. Oncogene, 12: 1173-1180, 1996.[Medline]
-
Botz J., Zerfass-Thome K., Spitkovsky D., Delius H., Vogt B., Eilers M., Hatzigeorgiou A., Jansen-Durr P. Cell cycle regulation of the murine cyclin E gene depends on an E2F binding site in the promoter. Mol. Cell. Biol., 16: 3401-3409, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Dellas A., Schultheiss E., Leivas M. R., Moch H., Torhorst J. Association of p27Kip1, cyclin E and c-myc expression with progression and prognosis in HPV-positive cervical neoplasms. Anticancer Res., 18: 3991-3998, 1998.[Medline]
-
Eguchi N., Fujii K., Tsuchida A., Yamamoto S., Sasaki T., Kajiyama G. Cyclin E overexpression in human gallbladder carcinomas. Oncol. Rep., 6: 93-96, 1999.[Medline]
-
Erlanson M., Portin C., Linderholm B., Lindh J., Roos G., Landberg G. Expression of cyclin E and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27 in malignant lymphomas-prognostic implications. Blood, 92: 770-777, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Furihata M., Ohtsuki Y., Sonobe H., Shuin T., Yamamoto A., Terao N., Kuwahara Prognostic significance of cyclin E and p53 protein overexpression in carcinoma of the renal pelvis and ureter. Br. J. Cancer, 77: 783-788, 1998.[Medline]
-
Nielsen N. H., Arnerlov C., Cajander S., Landberg G. Cyclin E expression and proliferation in breast cancer. Anal. Cell. Pathol., 17: 177-188, 1998.[Medline]
-
Fukuse T., Hirata T., Naiki H., Hitomi S., Wada H. Prognostic significance of cyclin E overexpression in resected non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res., 60: 242-244, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Mishina T., Dosaka-Akita H., Hommura F., Nishi M., Kojima T., Ogura S., Shimizu M., Katoh H., Kawakami Y. Cyclin E expression, a potential prognostic marker for non-small cell lung cancers. Clin. Cancer Res., 6: 11-16, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Zariwala M., Liu J., Xiong Y. Cyclin E2, a novel human G1 cyclin and activating partner of CDK2 and CDK3, is induced by viral oncoproteins. Oncogene, 17: 2787-2798, 1998.[Medline]
-
Lauper N., Beck A. R., Cariou S., Richman L., Hofmann K., Reith W., Slingerland J. M., Amati B. Cyclin E2: a novel CDK2 partner in the late G1 and S phases of the mammalian cell cycle. Oncogene, 17: 2637-2643, 1998.[Medline]
-
Gudas J. M., Payton M., Thukral S., Chen E., Bass M., Robinson M. O., Coats S. Cyclin E2, a novel G1 cyclin that binds cdk2 and is aberrantly expressed in human cancers. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 612-622, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Volm M., Koomägi R., Mattern J., Stammler G. Cyclin A is associated with an unfavorable outcome in patients with non-small cell lung carcinomas. Br. J. Cancer, 75: 1774-1778, 1997.[Medline]
-
Yang R., Nakamaki T., Lubbert M., Said J., Sakashita A., Freyaldenhoven B. S., Spira S., Huynh V., Müller C., Koeffler H. P. Cyclin A1 expression in leukemia and normal hematopoietic cells. Blood, 93: 2067-2074, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Gibson U. E., Heid C. A., Williams P. M. A novel method for real time quantitative RT-PCR. Genome Res., 6: 995-1001, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Livak K. J., Flood S. J., Marmaro J., Giusti W., Deetz K. Oligonucleotides with fluorescent dyes at opposite ends provide a quenched probe system useful for detecting PCR product and nucleic acid hybridization. PCR Methods Appl., 4: 357-362, 1995.[Medline]
-
Heid C. A., Stevens J., Livak K. J., Williams P. M. Realtime quantitative PCR. Genome Res., 6: 986-994, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Hirama T., Koeffler H. P. Role of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors in the development of cancer. Blood, 86: 841-854, 1995.[Free Full Text]
-
Sherr C. J. D-type cyclins. Trends Biochem. Sci., 20: 187-190, 1995.[Medline]
-
Yang R., Müller C., Huynh V., Fung Y. K., Yee A. S., Koeffler H. P. Functions of cyclin A1 in the cell cycle and its interactions with transcription factor E2F-1 and the Rb family of proteins. Mol. Cell. Biol., 19: 2400-2407, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Müller C., Yang R., Beck-von-Peccoz L., Idos G., Verbeek W., Koeffler H. P. GC boxes are required for cell cycle-regulated activation of the cyclin A1 promoter. Cloning of the gene and characterization of the promoter region. J. Biol. Chem., 274: 11220-11228, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Müller C., Readhead C., Diederichs S., Idos G., Yang R., Tidow N., Serve H., Berdel W. E., Koeffler H. P. Methylation of the cyclin A1 promoter correlates with gene silencing in somatic cell lines, while tissue-specific expression of cyclin A1 is methylation independent. Mol. Cell. Biol., 20: 3316-3329, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Liu D., Matzuk M. M., Sung W. K., Guo Q., Wang P., Wolgemuth D. J. Cyclin A1 is required for meiosis in the male mouse. Nat. Genet., 20: 377-380, 1998.[Medline]
-
Yang R., Morosetti R., Koeffler H. P. Characterization of a second human cyclin A that is highly expressed in testis and in several leukemia cell lines. Cancer Res., 57: 913-920, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
-
Murphy M., Stinnakre M. G., Senamaud-Beaufort C., Winston N. J., Sweeney C., Kubelka M., Carrington M., Brechot C., Sobczak-Thepot J. Delayed early embryonic lethality following disruption of the murine cyclin A2 gene. Nat. Genet., 15: 83-86, 1997.[Medline]
-
Keyomarsi K., Conte D., Toyofuku W., Fox M. P. Deregulation of cyclin E in breast cancer. Oncogene, 11: 941-950, 1995.[Medline]
-
Spruck C. H., Wong K. A., Reed S. I. Deregulated cyclin E induces chromosomal instability. Nature (Lond.), 401: 297-300, 1999.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:

|
 |

|
 |
 
A. H. Sikkema, S. H. Diks, W. F.A. den Dunnen, A. ter Elst, F. J.G. Scherpen, E. W. Hoving, R. Ruijtenbeek, P. J. Boender, R. de Wijn, W. A. Kamps, et al.
Kinome Profiling in Pediatric Brain Tumors as a New Approach for Target Discovery
Cancer Res.,
July 15, 2009;
69(14):
5987 - 5995.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. Ozeki and J. E. Shively
Differential cell fates induced by all-trans retinoic acid-treated HL-60 human leukemia cells
J. Leukoc. Biol.,
September 1, 2008;
84(3):
769 - 779.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
Y. Ma, S. Fiering, C. Black, X. Liu, Z. Yuan, V. A. Memoli, D. J. Robbins, H. A. Bentley, G. J. Tsongalis, E. Demidenko, et al.
Transgenic cyclin E triggers dysplasia and multiple pulmonary adenocarcinomas
PNAS,
March 6, 2007;
104(10):
4089 - 4094.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C-Q Zhu, W Shih, C-H Ling, and M-S Tsao
Immunohistochemical markers of prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer: a review and proposal for a multiphase approach to marker evaluation.
J. Clin. Pathol.,
August 1, 2006;
59(8):
790 - 800.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
P. Potemski, E. Pluciennik, A. K. Bednarek, R. Kusinska, D. Jesionek-Kupnicka, G. Pasz-Walczak, C. Watala, and R. Kordek
Cyclin E Expression in Operable Breast Cancer Quantified Using Real-Time RT-PCR: A Comparative Study with Immunostaining
Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol.,
March 1, 2006;
36(3):
142 - 149.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Singhal, A. Vachani, D. Antin-Ozerkis, L. R. Kaiser, and S. M. Albelda
Prognostic Implications of Cell Cycle, Apoptosis, and Angiogenesis Biomarkers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Review
Clin. Cancer Res.,
June 1, 2005;
11(11):
3974 - 3986.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Muller-Tidow, S. Diederichs, E. Bulk, T. Pohle, B. Steffen, J. Schwable, S. Plewka, M. Thomas, R. Metzger, P. M. Schneider, et al.
Identification of Metastasis-Associated Receptor Tyrosine Kinases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Cancer Res.,
March 1, 2005;
65(5):
1778 - 1782.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
S. Diederichs, E. Bulk, B. Steffen, P. Ji, L. Tickenbrock, K. Lang, K. S. Zanker, R. Metzger, P. M. Schneider, V. Gerke, et al.
S100 Family Members and Trypsinogens Are Predictors of Distant Metastasis and Survival in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Cancer Res.,
August 15, 2004;
64(16):
5564 - 5569.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Muller-Tidow, B. Steffen, T. Cauvet, L. Tickenbrock, P. Ji, S. Diederichs, B. Sargin, G. Kohler, M. Stelljes, E. Puccetti, et al.
Translocation Products in Acute Myeloid Leukemia Activate the Wnt Signaling Pathway in Hematopoietic Cells
Mol. Cell. Biol.,
April 1, 2004;
24(7):
2890 - 2904.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Muller-Tidow, J. Schwable, B. Steffen, N. Tidow, B. Brandt, K. Becker, E. Schulze-Bahr, H. Halfter, U. Vogt, R. Metzger, et al.
High-Throughput Analysis of Genome-Wide Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Expression in Human Cancers Identifies Potential Novel Drug Targets
Clin. Cancer Res.,
February 15, 2004;
10(4):
1241 - 1249.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
U. Kronenwett, S. Huwendiek, C. Ostring, N. Portwood, U. J. Roblick, Y. Pawitan, A. Alaiya, R. Sennerstam, A. Zetterberg, and G. Auer
Improved Grading of Breast Adenocarcinomas Based on Genomic Instability
Cancer Res.,
February 1, 2004;
64(3):
904 - 909.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
A.-I. Saez, A.-J. Saez, M.-J. Artiga, A. Perez-Rosado, F.-I. Camacho, A. Diez, J.-F. Garcia, M. Fraga, R. Bosch, S.-M. Rodriguez-Pinilla, et al.
Building an Outcome Predictor Model for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
Am. J. Pathol.,
February 1, 2004;
164(2):
613 - 622.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
C. Hamdouchi, H. Keyser, E. Collins, C. Jaramillo, J. E. De Diego, C. D. Spencer, J. A. Dempsey, B. D. Anderson, T. Leggett, N. B. Stamm, et al.
The discovery of a new structural class of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, aminoimidazo[1,2-a]pyridines
Mol. Cancer Ther.,
January 1, 2004;
3(1):
1 - 9.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
|
 |
|

|
 |

|
 |
 
M. D. Brundage, D. Davies, and W. J. Mackillop
Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : A Decade of Progress
Chest,
September 1, 2002;
122(3):
1037 - 1057.
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
[PDF]
|
 |
|