| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Department of Surgery and Surgical Basic Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507 [W. Y., A. M., K. F., T. N., N. I., T. M., H. O., M. I.], and Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo 113-8519 [S. A.], Japan
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Moreover, fibroblasts have the advantage that they are easily isolated and cultured even from small biopsy and specimens from the recipients themselves can be expanded to large numbers in cell culture. In addition, they can be readily transfected with liposomal or viral vectors because of their rapid growth in vitro (11, 12, 13) .
In regard to a strategy for killing the tumor, we focused on antiangiogenesis. Several studies have indicated that wound fluid has a high degree of angiogenic activity and could enhance the angiogenic switch of avascular, dormant microtumors (14 , 15) . Among the angiogenic molecules, VEGF2 is a potent participant in both wound healing and tumor growth. Brown et al. (16) showed that VEGF was up-regulated during wound repair, suggesting that it plays important roles in this process. We have demonstrated previously that VEGF induced strong tumorigenicity in the peritoneal cavity as well as in various organs (17 , 18) . Moreover, suppression of VEGFby competitive inhibition with the soluble form of Flt-1, which is a receptor for VEGF, contributed to the inhibition of tumor growth (19, 20, 21) . These lines of evidence led us the hypothesis that halting VEGF-dependent angiogenesis by implantation of fibroblasts genetically modified to carry sFlt-1 could induce inhibition of tumor wound recurrence.
To evaluate this hypothesis, we first examined the wound-specific accumulation of fibroblasts by transfecting the cells with the GFP gene. Then, we developed an intraabdominal cancer recurrence model using a rat colon cancer cell line, RCN-9. In addition, we constructed an adenovirus designated as AdFex, which encoded the soluble form of Flt-1. Autologous FibroFex were implanted into the syngenic wound recurrence model. The evidence presented here provided a novel strategy for treatment of wound-related disease, particularly cancer recurrence.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A rat colon cancer cell line, RCN-9, was obtained from the Riken Inc. and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS and P/S. All of the cultures were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere with 100% humidity.
Transfection with GFP Gene.
Fibroblasts were seeded in 10-cm tissue culture plates the day before transfection. For each plate, 36 µl of Fugene 6 was mixed with 600 µl of serum-free DMEM and left for 5 min. This mixture was added to 24 µg of reporter plasmid pEGFP-N1 (Clontech, CA) and incubated for 15 min. Then, 5.4 ml of medium was added, and the DNA/Fugene mixture was added to the plates without removing the medium from the cells. Cells were then harvested by trypsinization (0.25% trypsin/0.02% EDTA in PBS) and implanted into the animals.
Retroperitoneal Wound Models and Accumulation of GFP Gene-transfected Fibroblasts.
F344 rats (8-week-old males obtained from Charles River, Yokohama, Japan) were anesthetized with diethyl ether. A 1 cm x 1 cm intra-abdominal wound was made by resection of the right retroperitoneal epithelium. The wounded animals were divided into four groups comprised of five rats each as follows: (a) peritoneum-derived fibroblasts were i.p. administrated immediately after injury; (b) skin-derived fibroblasts were i.p. administered immediately after injury; (c) peritoneum-derived fibroblasts were i.p. administered 1 week after injury; and (d) 100 µg of naked plasmid pEGFP-N1 in 200 µl of PBS were i.p. injected immediately after injury. Aliquots of 1 x107 fibroblasts in 200 µl of PBS were used in each rat. Five days after administration, the rats were sacrificed and checked under a stereofluorescence microscope (Olympus, Japan). Frozen sections were also examined to confirm the results.
Tumor Growth at the Site of Retroperitoneal Injury: Wound Recurrence Model.
After 1-cm2 right retroperitoneal resection, the abdominal wall was closed, and i.p. injection of 1 x 107 RCN-9 cells in 1 ml of PBS was immediately performed.
Adenoviral Vectors.
The replication-deficient adenovirus vectors used in this study were E1a-, partially E1b-, and partially E3- vectors based on human adenovirus type 5 (Riken. Inc., Tsukuba, Japan). Each vector contained an expression cassette using the CAG (chicken beta-actin promoter associated with cytomegalovirus enhancer) promoter/enhancer, an artificial splice sequence, followed by different transgenes and a poly(A) sequence. In AdFex, the cDNA encoded the first three immunoglobulin-like loops of sFlt-1, which were involved in high-affinity binding of VEGF(22)
but lacked the transmembrane and intracellular domains. AdGFP contained the cDNA for GFP(Riken Inc.). All of the adenoviral vectors were propagated in 293 cells, purified by two rounds of cesium chloride density centrifugation, dialyzed, and stored at -70°C. The titer (expressed as plaque-forming units/milliliter) of each viral stock was determined by plaque assay with 293 cells. All of the vector preparations were demonstrated to be free of replication-competent adenoviruses. The transduction of AdGFP and AdFex into fibroblasts was performed at a multiplicity of infection of 50.
Western Blot Analysis for sFlt-1.
Aliquots of 20 µg of protein were separated by 10% SDS-PAGE under reducing conditions and blotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Immobilon-PVDF; Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA). First, they were incubated with rabbit antibody against NH2 terminus of mouse sFlt-1 (kindly provided by Dr. Masabumi Shibuya, Tokyo University, Tokyo, Japan; Ref. 22
), diluted 1:200 for 60 min at room temperature, and then with goat antirabbit IgG (H+L) conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Zymed Laboratories, Inc., San Francisco, CA) diluted 1:1000 for 60 min at room temperature. Finally, the enhanced chemiluminescence system (Amersham) was used for detection. Protein concentration was determined using BCA* Protein Assay Reagents, Pierce (Rockford, IL). The amount of sFlt-1 was determined by area analysis of autoradiograms using an ARGUS-50, 3.3 (Hamamatsu, Japan).
Collection of Wound Fluid and a Migration Assay.
Before and 1, 3, 24, 72, and 168 h after retroperitoneal wounding in 10 rats, 3 ml of PBS used to wash each wound was collected and designated as wound fluid 0, 1, 3, 24, 72, and 168 h, respectively. The migration ability of fibroblasts was assayed using a Transwell chamber (Corning Inc., Corning, NY). A 4 x 105/ml suspension of single cells in conditioned medium was applied to the upper chamber, and medium containing 10% wound fluid was applied to the lower chamber. After incubation for 20 h, cells on the upper side of the membrane were removed. The number of cells that had passed through the membrane to the lower side was counted under a microscope after staining with Diff-Quik (International Reagent Corp., Kobe, Japan).
Detection of Neovascularization with the Dorsal Air Sac Method.
The dorsal air sac method was performed as described previously (23)
. FibroFex or AdGFP were washed three times with PBS and suspended in PBS at a concentration of 2 x 106 cells/0.2 ml. A Millipore chamber (diameter, 10 mm; filter pore size, 0.45 µm) was filled with 0.2 ml of the cells and implanted s.c. into the dorsal side of the rats. On day 5 after implantation, the rats were anesthetized and fixed in the prone position. A wide, rectangular incision was made in the skin on the dorsal side, and the skin was carefully ablated. To locate the chamber-contacting region, a ring (Millipore) of the same shape as the chamber was placed onto the s.c. tissues adjacent to the chamber region, and the area was photographed. The s.c. tissues were then fixed and made into paraffin sections for microvessel staining.
Microvessel Staining and Evaluation.
As an indicator of angiogenesis, microvessels were counted in immunohistochemically stained sections under light microscopy. Antifactor VIII polyclonal antibody (Dako Polyclonal; Dako Corporation, Carpinteria, CA) was used after the immunoperoxidase procedure (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA; Ref. 24
). After screening the areas with intense neovascularization at a low magnification (x40 or x100), microvessels were counted in a x200 field (0.739 mm2/field). In all of the samples, the mean value for the number of microvessel was calculated from five different x200 fields.
Statistical Analysis.
The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS, Release 6.0 (NANKODO Co. Ltd., Chicago, IL). Analysis of the significance of difference among multiple groups (chemoattractant activity, tumor volume, and MVD in the wound recurrence model after treatment) was performed by ANOVA. The survival curves were plotted according to the Kaplan-Meier method, and the statistical differences were analyzed by using the generalized log-rank test. P < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significant.
| RESULTS AND DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
GFP Gene-transfected Autologous Fibroblasts Accumulate Specifically in the Wound after Immediate Implantation.
Green fluorescence was observed in the right retroperitoneal wound after immediate postoperative implantation of GFP gene-transfected autologous fibroblasts (Fig. 1)
. Under higher magnification (x100), we identified morphologically that the fluorescence was derived from fibroblasts as confirmed on frozen sections. Fibroblasts derived from both the peritoneum and skin migrated exclusively to the wound after implantation. Such specific accumulation was also observed in the wound recurrence model. Faint fluorescence was observed at the paramedian incision site. On the other hand, when the fibroblasts were administered i.p. 7 days after retroperitoneal injury, no specific fluorescence was observed in the retroperitoneal space. Injection into the wound of either naked pEGFP-N1 cDNA or AdGFP resulted in no specific fluorescence.
|
|
|
|
|
Considering the potential role of angiogenic factors, especially VEGF, on tumor growth, sFlt-1 is a potent candidate for transfection into fibroblasts, thereby leading to the prevention of tumor recurrence around the surgically resected area. The VEGF expression in the wound fluid of normal rat appeared as fast as 1 h. After a peak at 24 h, it was down-regulated and disappeared on day 7 (data not shown). We believe 7 day is the predominant period for angiogenesis in wound healing of rats. The transient expression of adenovirus is efficient in this study. Because fibroblasts administrated i.p. were preferentially accumulated in the retroperitoneal wound, systemic angiogenesis and healing of the abdominal wall were not affected.
The present study also showed that injured tissue secreted chemoattractants for migration of fibroblasts as early as 1 h after injury, production of which decreased as wound repair progressed. In addition, changes in the pattern of chemoattractant activity in the wound fluid suggested that early after injury is an appropriate time to administer the fibroblasts.
Thus, exogenously inoculated fibroblasts exhibited wound-specific accumulation, and genetically engineered fibroblasts can facilitate specific gene delivery to the surgical wound, which is an area of high-risk of cancer recurrence. In conclusion, fibroblasts transfected with sFlt-1 using an adenoviral vector inhibited tumor growth at the site of surgical injury. This method of fibroblast-mediated gene therapy is a promising novel strategy for preventing and controlling wound-related recurrence of cancer after surgery.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Surgery and Surgical Basic Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54-Shogoin Kawara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Phone: 81-75-751-3446; Fax: 81-75-751-3219; E-mail: weigeyang{at}hotmail.com ![]()
2 The abbreviations used are: VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; P/S, penicillin-streptomycin; GFP, green fluorescent protein; sFlt-1, soluble Flt-1; AdFex, adenovirus encoded with sFlt-1; AdGFP, adenovirus encoded with GFP; FibroFex fibroblasts transfected with AdFex; FibroGFP, fibroblasts transfected with AdGFP. ![]()
Received 2/12/01. Accepted 9/ 4/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. J. Bunch, S. Mahapatra, G. K. Bruce, S. B. Johnson, D. V. Miller, B. D. Horne, X.-L. Wang, H.-C. Lee, N. M. Caplice, and D. L. Packer Impact of Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 on Atrioventricular Node Conduction Modification by Injected Autologous Fibroblasts in the Canine Heart Circulation, May 30, 2006; 113(21): 2485 - 2494. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Schmidt, J. Hoffend, A. Altmann, L. G. Strauss, A. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss, B. Engelhardt, D. Koczan, J. Peter, S. Vorwald, H. Eskerski, et al. Transfer of the sFLT-1 Gene in Morris Hepatoma Results in Decreased Growth and Perfusion and Induction of Genes Associated with Stress Response Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2005; 11(6): 2132 - 2140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. De Wever, W. Westbroek, A. Verloes, N. Bloemen, M. Bracke, C. Gespach, E. Bruyneel, and M. Mareel Critical role of N-cadherin in myofibroblast invasion and migration in vitro stimulated by colon-cancer-cell-derived TGF-{beta} or wounding J. Cell Sci., September 15, 2004; 117(20): 4691 - 4703. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Pereboeva, S. Komarova, G. Mikheeva, V. Krasnykh, and D.T. Curiel Approaches to Utilize Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells as Cellular Vehicles Stem Cells, July 1, 2003; 21(4): 389 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Sugimoto, Y. Hamano, D. Charytan, D. Cosgrove, M. Kieran, A. Sudhakar, and R. Kalluri Neutralization of Circulating Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) by Anti-VEGF Antibodies and Soluble VEGF Receptor 1 (sFlt-1) Induces Proteinuria J. Biol. Chem., April 4, 2003; 278(15): 12605 - 12608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |