| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Regular Articles |
Roy E. Coats Research Laboratories, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1714 [J. L. D., W. H. M.]; Department of Nuclear Science, Tsing-Hua University, Hsin-Chu, Taiwan [C-S. C.]; and Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan [J-H. H.]
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
. There is literature to support possible roles for TNF-
as a contributor to edema, gliosis, and demyelination in the brain, all of which are histopathologically associated with radiation-induced brain damage. We have examined the role of TNF-
signaling in the response to brain irradiation using TNFRp55- or TNFRp75-deficient and control mice. Mice lacking TNFRp75 exhibited increased early radiation-induced apoptosis in putative stem cell regions of the brain. At 1 month, they had decreased proliferative responses in the same regions, and by 3 months they were demonstrating dose-dependent seizures and other severe neurological abnormalities that were not seen in control or TNFRp55-/- mice. Seizure activity correlated with the onset of extensive demyelination, and by 6 months, levels of myelin basic protein in irradiated TNFRp75-/- mice were
40% of those seen in the other two strains; the animals were moribund and had to be euthanized. These observations indicate that radiation-induced TNF-
, acting through TNFRp75, protects against the development of late complications of brain irradiation. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The potential consequences of damaging normal tissue within the chosen radiation field can be very severe and limit this form of therapy. Fractionation and careful treatment planning using shaped beams are used in the clinic to spare normal tissue, but some is inevitably still in the field. Understanding the mechanisms of late radiation-induced damage in the CNS3 at the molecular and cellular level could lead to novel strategies for radioprotection of normal brain tissues that would allow increases in dose and the probability of tumor cure.
The clinical symptoms that may follow brain irradiation can be divided into three major groups according to the time after treatment at which they occur. The acute (during or within the first 24 h after treatment) and subacute effects (a few weeks to a few months later) that include nausea and vomiting tend to be transient and usually resolve on their own. However, late effects (those occurring 6 months to several years after treatment) can be very severe and may seriously decrease the quality of life of the patient. These effects are especially dangerous because they are generally irreversible.
The histopathological features associated with symptoms of brain irradiation are very diverse, although they are almost always confined to the white matter. Vascular damage is reported commonly, and it has been suggested that the cerebral microvasculature might be the primary lesion leading to increased blood-brain barrier permeability, edema, and lymphocyte infiltration in the early phases, as well as telangiectasias, thromboses, and hemorrhage in the late phase (2) . Cells of the parenchyma are also affected, as is evidenced by gliosis and demyelination. Despite the apparent diversity of radiation-induced histopathological lesions in the CNS, three cardinal features of late radiation damage can be defined. These are edema, gliosis, and late demyelination.
The molecular and cellular mechanisms governing the development of these responses are not clear but appear to coordinate parenchymal and vascular cells in a response to damage (2)
. Cytokines and growth factors in large part regulate such interactions. Growth factors such as platelet-derived growth factor, ciliary neurotrophic factor, nerve growth factor, and fibroblast growth factor, as well as cytokines like transforming growth factor-ß, are known to be important in the development and homeostasis of normal brain (3, 4, 5, 6)
. Furthermore, studies in other models of brain injury have implicated the proinflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF-
and IL-1, in the pathogenesis of CNS damage. For example, TNF-
and IL-1 have been implicated in edema seen after ischemic and hypoxic injury (7
, 8)
. TNF-
and IL-1 can also regulate proliferation of astrocytes in response to various types of CNS injury (9, 10, 11)
, implicating them in gliosis. TNF-
is also cytotoxic to oligodendrocytes in vitro (12)
and is expressed in lesions in multiple sclerosis (13
, 14)
as well as in EAE (15)
, implicating this cytokine in demyelination.
Because proinflammatory cytokine production has been associated with edema, gliosis, and demyelination in other models and these are the three cardinal features of radiation-induced brain damage, we examined this aspect of the brains response to irradiation in mice. Previously, we reported that radiation induces a coordinated proinflammatory response in the CNS that involves, in particular, the cytokine TNF-
(16, 17, 18)
. mRNA levels for this cytokine peak after 28 h and return to baseline by 24 h after irradiation. Also during the acute phase, radiation causes apoptosis of cells in white matter areas such as the corpus callosum, as well as in putative stem cell areas such as the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and the subventricular zone in the walls of the lateral ventricles (19
, 20)
.
After the acute phase, the TNF-
response in mouse brain follows a cyclic pattern during the subacute and late phases, with peaks occurring at around 23 and 56 months after irradiation (17
, 21)
. These peaks in TNF-
expression correlate with nadirs in levels of oligodendrocyte markers (myelin basic protein levels and cyclic nucleotide phosphohydrolase activity), increases in expression of proteins associated with reactive gliosis, such as glial fibrillary acidic protein, and, interestingly, with the appearance of observable neurological side effects (22
, 23)
. To further investigate the role of TNF-
pathways in the development of radiation-induced brain injury, we compared the molecular, cellular, and neurological responses of TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 knockout mice and intact C57BL/6 control mice to brain irradiation. Differences were found that indicate that these dual receptors may mediate mutually antagonistic responses and that the TNFRp75, in particular, performs a radioprotective function after brain irradiation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
All experiments were performed using a minimum of three mice per time or dose point, with each experiment repeated three times.
Irradiations.
The irradiation protocol has been described previously (16)
. Briefly, C57BL/6, TNFRp55-/-, and TNFRp75-/- mice, 68 weeks of age, were anesthetized with Nembutal and placed on their sides into an irradiation jig that allows irradiation of the midbrain while shielding the esophagus, eyes, and the rest of the body. The jig was then placed into a 250 kVp orthovoltage X-ray machine (Phillips), and the midbrains were given the stated radiation doses at a dose rate of 2.88 Gy/min.
RNA Isolation and RNase Protection Assays.
For isolation of total RNA from brain tissue for RNase protection assays, mice were sacrificed by cervical dislocation at various time points after irradiation, as described previously (16)
. Brains were removed, and the midbrain sections were dissected out and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. For each time point, three midbrains (still frozen) were homogenized in lysis buffer (4 M guanidine, 25 mM sodium citrate, 0.5% sarcosyl, and 0.1 M 2-mercaptoethanol) in a glass tissue homogenizer. RNA was extracted from these lysates in phenol:chloroform:isoamyl alcohol followed by isopropanol precipitation, as described previously by Chomczynski and Sacchi (24)
. RNA pellets were then washed in 70% ethanol and resuspended in diethyl pyrocarbonate-treated water at a concentration of 5 µg/µl. Radiolabeling of the probes was carried out using [
-32P]dUTP (ICN Biomedicals, Irvine, CA) and the In Vitro Transcription kit from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturers instructions. We used either the mCK-3b (BD PharMingen) or an in-house probe set containing TNF-
, IL-1
, IL-1ß, and RPL32 for all assays. After overnight hybridization of probe with 25 µg (5 µl) of total RNA from each sample, RNase protection was carried out using the reagents from the RiboQuant RPA kit (BD PharMingen). Protected species were separated on a 5% polyacrylamide sequencing gel. Bands were imaged using a STORM PhosphorImager (Molecular Dynamics), and densitometry measurements were performed with ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).
Preparation of Brain Tissue for Histology.
For apoptosis (TUNEL), proliferation (BrdUrd) assays, demyelination (Luxol fast blue), and routine staining (H&E), brains were removed and fixed in 10% buffered formalin for 2 weeks. Brains were cut at the level of the bregma using a brain matrix (Harvard Apparatus, Holliston, MA), and the two halves were embedded side-by-side in paraffin. Tissue sections (5-µm thick) were cut for further analysis.
TUNEL Assays.
Apoptosis in tissue sections was visualized in situ using a TUNEL (TdT-mediated UTP nick-end labeling) assay. Brains from three mice/strain were removed at specified time points (0, 2, 6, and 24 h after irradiation) and processed as above. In situ TUNEL assays were performed on five brain sections from each mouse. The TUNEL labeling reaction was carried out using the In Situ Cell Death Detection kit (Roche) in accord with the manufacturers instructions and with appropriate specificity controls. Briefly, sections were incubated with proteinase K (20 µg/ml in 10 mM Tris/HCl; Fisher Biotech) at 37°C for 30 min and washed twice with PBS. Sections were then incubated in TdT/fluorescein-conjugated nucleotide mix for 1 h at 37°C in a humidified chamber and washed three times in PBS. Sections were incubated with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated antifluorescein antibody for 1 h at 37°C, washed, and incubated with Naptha/Fast Red alkaline phosphatase substrate (Sigma Chemical Co.), which stained apoptotic cells red. The sections were then counterstained with hematoxylin and visualized by light microscopy. Apoptotic cells were counted as a percentage of the total number of cells/field for several areas in the brain, including the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus and the corpus callosum.
BrdUrd Incorporation and Detection.
In situ proliferation was assessed by BrdUrd uptake and staining. At various time points after irradiations, three mice of each strain were injected i.p. with 0.2 ml of a freshly prepared BrdUrd solution (Calbiochem; 6.6 mg/ml) to pulse-label cells in S-phase. After 1 h, mice were deeply anesthetized and perfused by a transcardiac route with 10% buffered formalin using a peristaltic pump (Bio-Rad). The brains were processed as described above. BrdUrd-labeled cells were detected in five sections/brain using a BrdUrd Staining kit (Oncogene Research Products) according to the protocol provided. Briefly, endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched using a solution of 30% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Sections were incubated with trypsin, and cellular DNA was denatured with sodium hydroxide. Sections were blocked and incubated for 45 min with biotinylated anti-BrdUrd antibody, followed by incubation with streptavidin-peroxidase. Diaminobenzidine substrate was used for visualization of BrdUrd-positive cells. BrdUrd-positive cells were counted in the same areas of the brain as were the TUNEL-positive cells, and percentages were calculated using the same technique.
Myelin Staining.
To stain for myelin content, tissue sections from mice at 0, 3, and 5.5 months after irradiation were treated with Luxol fast blue and cresyl violet. Sections were stained overnight in Luxol Fast Blue (Sigma Chemical Co.) at 56°C and washed in 95% ethanol and distilled water to remove excess blue stain. The color was then differentiated (until white matter was easily distinguishable from gray matter) in lithium carbonate solution for 15 s, followed by distilled water and three washes of 80% alcohol. Slides were washed in distilled water and stained for 6 min in prewarmed, 56°C cresyl violet solution (Sigma Chemical Co.) to stain nuclei. The cresyl violet stain was differentiated in several changes of 95% ethanol, followed by incubation in butanol for 20 min, a rinse in absolute alcohol, and an incubation in chloroform for 30 min. Slides were passed through fresh xylene twice, mounted with Permount (Fisher), and coverslipped.
Isolation and Assay of MBP in Mouse Brain.
MBP was isolated from mouse midbrain tissue by the method of Deibler et al. (25)
. Three midbrains from each strain were combined to produce pooled extract for each time point (0, 3, and 5.5 months). Tissue was weighed and homogenized in 19 volumes of a chloroform:methanol (2:1) solution. The homogenates were left overnight at 4°C and then centrifuged at 5,000 x g for 10 min. The pellets were homogenized in acidified water (pH 3.0) and left at room temperature for 1 h. After centrifugation at 12,000 x g for 1 h, the supernatants were removed and dialyzed for 4 h against 1 M Tris-HCl (pH 8.8) using a Slide-a-Lyzer 10K dialysis cassette (Pierce). Total protein concentration was measured by the BCA method (Pierce), and MBP was assayed by ELISA. Extracts were placed in NUNC ELISA plates and incubated at 37°C for 1 h and at 4°C overnight. The plates were washed with buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA and 0.05% Tween 20, pH 7) three times and blocked with a solution of 4% BSA in Tris (pH 7.4) at 37°C for 1 h and at 4°C overnight. After washing, MBP monoclonal antibody (1:100) derived from the GB-1 clone (gift from Dr. Champagoni, University of California at Los Angeles) was added, and the plate was incubated at 37°C for 1 h. After washing, a 1:2000 dilution of horseradish peroxidase-conjugated antimouse IgG (Chemicon) was added for 45 min at 37°C, followed by washing, incubation at room temperature with tetramethylbenzoate substrate solution (Endogen), and reading in a Tecan plate reader at 450 nm. Bovine MBP was used as a standard (Sigma Chemical Co.).
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Previously, we have shown that demyelination occurs in C3H mice during both the subacute and late phases after radiation, and that its extent at 6 months after irradiation correlates well with the delivered dose (22)
. Because demyelination is a cardinal feature of radiation-induced brain damage and is thought to contribute to many observed neurological side effects, the extent of demyelination was assessed in the TNFR knockout and control mice. Demyelination was quantified using an ELISA-based assay for MBP. The data at 5.5 months after 25 Gy of radiation, pooled from three separate experiments, are presented in Fig. 2
. The response of wild-type C57BL/6 mice was similar to that found for C3H/Sed//Kam mice at 6 months after 25 Gy with a 20% decrease in total MBP content that was statistically significant (P < 0.05; Ref. 22
). Brains from TNFRp55-/- mice had a similar, although slightly less (1416%), reduction. In contrast, MBP levels in TNFRp75-/- mice had decreased by 40% by 5.5 months after 25 Gy. Indeed, even after 3 months after irradiation, TNFRp75-/- brains demonstrated MBP levels that had already been reduced to
80% of the control values (data not shown).
|
|
|
mRNA expression at
2 h that returned to baseline levels by 24 h. TNFRp55-/- mice showed a similar pattern of TNF-
mRNA expression, both quantitatively and qualitatively. In contrast, TNF-
mRNA in irradiated TNFRp75-/- brains rose to levels that were consistently two to three times higher than the other two strains at 2 h.
|
1 month after 25 Gy (17
, 21
, 23)
. To study the potential role of TNF-
signaling in the proliferative response, we irradiated mice from the control and receptor knockout strains and pulse-labeled S-phase cells in the brain at 1 month after irradiation with BrdUrd. There were few proliferative cells in sections from unirradiated brains of all strains. However, 1 month after irradiation an increased number was present, particularly along the blades of the granule cell layer in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus. Brains from TNFRp75-/- mice showed markedly less radiation-induced proliferation than those from C57BL/6 and TNFRp55-/- mice (Table 2)
|
gene expression by evaluating cytokine responses at 48 h, 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months after irradiation (Fig. 5)
mRNA expression was elevated at 1 and 2 weeks and peaked 1 month after irradiation. It decreased slightly thereafter but remained elevated above baseline levels throughout the 6-month time course study, similar to what we observed in C3H mice (18)
. TNF-
mRNA responses in TNFRp55-/- mice and TNFRp75-/- mice were similar to controls over the first 2 weeks. In TNFRp55-/- mice, TNF-
mRNA expression levels remain at this elevated level out to 6 months. In contrast, in TNFRp75-/- mice, levels returned to baseline by 1 month after the radiation dose and never increased thereafter.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The ability of C57Bl/6 mice to survive relatively high doses of radiation to the brain contrasts with C3H/Sed//Kam mice, which die around 6 months after 3040 Gy brain irradiation (23) . The extent of demyelination after 25 Gy is similar in both strains after 56 months, but it is more focal in the former strain. No other significant differences were observed, and there was little vascular damage in either strain, but the finding raises the question of whether death after brain irradiation in C3H mice is unrelated to demyelination. Given the close dose-response relationship and histological findings (19) , demyelination is obviously a cardinal feature of the response, but death may be attributable to damage to specific critical areas in the brain, and the pattern of demyelination may be important. On the other hand, others have observed differences between C3H and C57Bl/6 mice strains in the response of other tissues to radiation, and in particular radiation-induced fibrosis (27) . When the molecular basis of these differences is elucidated, they may indicate a mechanism that is shared and involved in brain responses to irradiation.
TNF-
, as well as many other cytokines and growth factors, has varying effects on the different cell types in the CNS, including oligodendrocytes, astrocytes, and even neurons. The responses induced are critical for the development and maintenance of the normal central nervous system, as evidenced by certain gene knockout models (3
, 28)
. These signals must be tightly controlled so that they are expressed and received at the appropriate time and by the appropriate cell type. Radiation-induced proinflammatory gene expression can be considered as a coordinated attempt at wound healing response that involves interactions between parenchymal and vascular cells, as well as infiltrating leukocytes that migrate to the site of injury (18)
. The repetitive cyclical response observed with time after irradiation may be evidence of dysregulation of this response caused by radiation-induced cell loss and attempts at recovery, leading to inappropriate expression or "out-of-context" reactions. In TNFRp75-/- mice, clearly, several aspects of these apparently coordinated responses are severely affected, arguing in favor of a role for this receptor in linking and controlling acute, subacute, and late molecular and cellular events after irradiation.
It is tempting to think that the increase in acute radiation-induced apoptosis within putative stem cell areas in the brain of TNFRp75-/- mice is linked to the later observed decreased proliferative response in the same areas. Identification of the cells in these areas has been hampered by the lack of markers of stem cell lineage (29)
, and attempts are being made to better characterize the cells in the apoptotic and proliferative responses. Stem cells in these areas have been shown to proliferate, differentiate, and migrate to sites of injury in the CNS of the rodent, sometimes to areas as distant as the spinal cord (29, 30, 31)
. Hopewell and Cavanaugh (31)
were the first to show changes in proliferation in the rat subependymoma after irradiation, showing a decrease in mitotic count during the first 24 h after irradiation with subsequent recovery by 3 months if the dose was 20 Gy or lower. No recovery was seen at higher doses, even after 6 months. Recently, Tada et al. (30)
have shown similar patterns of response in the subependymoma. It has been suggested that the cells in the neural stem cell areas can regenerate functional neurons after injury, especially within the pyramidal layer (32, 33, 34)
. The effect of TNF-
signaling on these specialized stem cell populations requires further investigation, especially because both TNF-
production and radiation-induced apoptosis are elevated in TNFRp75-/- brain at this early time point. In vitro experiments are under way to examine this relationship.
Our data suggest that TNF-
signaling, particularly through TNFRp75, has a central role in regulating the balance, not only of cell death, but also of cell proliferation after radiation exposure. TNF-
expression in TNFRp75-/- brain was abrogated by 1 month after irradiation, as was the proliferative response. There is evidence that TNF-
is protective during other demyelinating diseases, such as EAE (35)
. Also, recent studies have also suggested a protective role for TNFRp75 in other types of brain injury. For example, Eugster et al. (36)
have shown that signaling through TNFRp75 is neuroprotective during the course of EAE. Also, Shen et al. (37)
have shown a protective role for TNFRp75 in hypoxic injury, as well as in ß-amyloid toxicity in the brain. Finally, it has been shown that knocking out both TNFRs exacerbates damage from ischemia and seizures in mice (38)
. This contrasts with the original concept, which was largely derived from the observation that TNF-
was cytotoxic for oligodendrocytes in vitro (39
, 40)
and that TNF-
was detrimental, rather than protective, in the CNS (14
, 41)
. It should be noted, however, that certain clinical symptoms may still be associated with TNF-
production, including edema and somnolence. This may be why there is no obvious clinical connection between acute symptoms and late brain damage after irradiation.
The exact mechanism of TNFRp75-mediated radioprotection of the brain remains unclear. It is known that TNFRp75, upon binding TNF-
, can activate NF-
B (42
, 43)
, leading to transcription of genes involved in cell survival that can mitigate the effects of various insults, which includes countering TNF-
-induced apoptosis mediated through TNFRp55 (42)
. One potential NF-
B-dependent mechanism that could prevent cell death or enhance cell survival after irradiation is activation of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAP1, cIAP2, and XIAP) that bind to TNFRp75/TRAF2 complexes and interfere with the apoptotic mechanism, primarily by interfering with caspase-3 and caspase-7 actions (44, 45, 46)
. Although TNFRp55 can also induce NF-
B activation through activating kinase RIP (47
, 48)
, our preliminary data indicate a blunted NF-
B response to irradiation in the TNFRp75-/- mouse brain.4
Because TNFRp75 does not contain a death domain, we hypothesize that this particular pathway to activation of NF-
B counterbalances proapoptotic responses mediated through TNFRp55 pathways and is important in the response of the CNS to irradiation, although other pathways may contribute. Although the TNFRp55-/- mice showed no overt phenotype in this study, in vitro experiments with oligodendrocytes indicate mutual antagonism between TNFRp55 and TNFRp75 pathways.4
The lack of TNF-
expression in the late phases after brain irradiation of TNFRp75-/- mice is of interest. The TNF-
gene itself is a target gene for NF-
B, and the failure of TNFRp75-/- mice to maintain TNF-
production supports its role in a "positive feedback" process that involves TNFRp75-/- and NF-
B activation. TNFRp75 may therefore be required for sustaining a NF-
B response that is required for normal tissue repair and maintenance. There is evidence that TNFRp75 sustains immune responses mediated by TNF-
(49)
, and a similar mechanism may occur after injury in the CNS.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 Supported by National Cancer Institute Grant 66605 and the Singleton Fund. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California- Los Angeles, 10833 Leconte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1714. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: CNS, central nervous system; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; IL, interleukin; EAE, experimental autoimmune encephalitis; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; MBP, myelin basic protein; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling; NF-
B, nuclear factor-
B; RPA, RNase protection assay. ![]()
4 J. L. Daigle, unpublished observations. ![]()
Received 5/24/01. Accepted 10/17/01.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-1ß mediate intercellular adhesion molecule-1 induction via microglia-astrocyte interaction in CNS radiation injury. J. Neuroimmunol., 95: 95-106, 1999.[Medline]
B and c-jun transcription factors in multiple sclerosis lesions. Implications for oligodendrocyte pathology. Am. J. Pathol., 155: 1433-1438, 1999.
expression by resident microglia and infiltrating leukocytes in the central nervous system of mice with experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Regulation by Th1 cytokines. J. Immunol., 154: 944-953, 1995.[Abstract]
in the central nervous system. Eur. J. Immunol., 27: 905-913, 1997.[Medline]
B activation, and increased sensitivity to TNF-induced cell death in TRAF2-deficient mice. Immunity, 7: 715-725, 1997.[Medline]
B control. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 10057-10062, 1997.
B-regulated X-chromosome-linked IAP gene expression protects endothelial cells from tumor necrosis factor
-induced apoptosis. J. Exp. Med., 188: 211-216, 1998.
B signal. Immunity, 8: 297-303, 1998.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. H. Darzy and S. M. Shalet Absence of Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) Neurosecretory Dysfunction but Increased Cortisol Concentrations and Production Rates in ACTH-Replete Adult Cancer Survivors after Cranial Irradiation for Nonpituitary Brain Tumors J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., September 1, 2005; 90(9): 5217 - 5225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-Q. Li, P. Chen, A. Haimovitz-Friedman, R. M. Reilly, and C. S. Wong Endothelial Apoptosis Initiates Acute Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption after Ionizing Radiation Cancer Res., September 15, 2003; 63(18): 5950 - 5956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Mizumatsu, M. L. Monje, D. R. Morhardt, R. Rola, T. D. Palmer, and J. R. Fike Extreme Sensitivity of Adult Neurogenesis to Low Doses of X-Irradiation Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 4021 - 4027. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |