| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Experimental Therapeutics |
Sensitizes Low Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-expressing Carcinomas for Anti-EGFR Therapy1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology [M. H., M. R., J. K., R. K.], Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology [C. S., M. S.], Central Research Unit [A. S-K.], School of Medicine, J. W. Goethe University, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany, and Lukas Krankenhaus [H-G. S.], 41460 Neuss, Germany
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(TNF-
) treatment in
vivo. Moreover, tumors that primarily do not respond to
antibody treatment can be made susceptible by additional TNF-
treatment. To investigate the in vivo effects of
monoclonal antibodies, we treated tumors derived from cell lines (A431
and Detroit 562) as well as spontaneously occurring squamous cell
carcinomas and adenocarcinomas (transplanted on
NMRI-nu/nu mice) generally with EMD 55900 (40 µg/g
mouse) and its humanized version EMD 72000 (40 µg/g mouse). When
treated with EMD 55900 and EMD 72000, carcinomas with an EGFR
concentration of
70 fmol/mg protein showed significant reduction in
tumor size compared with untreated controls. The degree of tumor
regression correlated with the EGFR concentration of the tumor. In mice
treated with TNF-
(0.5 µg/g mouse) and EMD 55900/72000
simultaneously, we observed enhanced antitumor effects up to complete
tumor eradication. Carcinomas with an EGFR concentration <70 fmol/mg
protein could be made susceptible to treatment with EMD 55900 and EMD
72000 by simultaneous treatment with TNF-
, resulting in a
significant reduction in tumor size. | INTRODUCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
3
with the EGFR (1)
. Because TNF-
has been identified as
a potential cytokine for inducing apoptosis, its apoptotic
effects may be used therapeutically. TNF-
binds to specific cell
surface receptors and activates a cell death program as described
previously (1
, 2)
. The stimulated TNF-
receptor induces
apoptosis through the stimulation of intracellular caspases. In
contrast, the inhibition of these proteases (caspases)
suppresses TNF-
-induced apoptosis (1)
. EGFR expression
has been strongly increased by TNF-
via the p55 TNF-
receptor (3
, 8)
. Furthermore, TNF-
improves the
vascular permeability of the tumor microvasculature and increases the
uptake of immunoglobulins and monoclonal antibodies into the tumor
(4)
. Recent studies (1)
revealed evidence
that TNF-
reduces EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation by stimulating a
protein tyrosine phosphatase. It also has been demonstrated that EGF
inhibits TNF-
-induced apoptosis (5)
. This suggests a
sensitizing effect between the blocking of the EGFR and the effects of
TNF-
. It is well known that different malignant tumors overexpress the EGFR or amplify genes encoding the EGFR. In tumors of the head and neck, EGFR gene amplification occurs in 1020% of squamous cell carcinomas, whereas overexpression of the EGFR occurs in a much higher proportion (6) . In mammary carcinomas, gene amplification has been observed only rarely (6) . Overexpression of the EGFR on cellular surfaces in adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland also occurs rarely (6) . There have been a few studies showing that targeting the overexpressed EGFR with monoclonal antibodies leads to a reduction in tumor growth in vivo (2 , 7, 8, 9, 10, 11) . For strong antitumor activity of the monoclonal antibodies, high expression of the EGFR seems to be required (12 , 13) .
Referring to former studies (1, 2, 3)
characterizing the
interactive effect of TNF-
and monoclonal antibodies against the
EGFR, we investigated possible new implications for anti-EGFR
monoclonal antibody treatment. In this report, we first described the
observation, in a large series of xenotransplant experiments, of a
sensitizing effect between monoclonal antibody treatment against the
EGFR and treatment with TNF-
. The combination of both agents
resulted in enhanced tumor regression.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and Antibodies.
10 pM,
5 x 108 sites/µg membrane
protein); and (b) a relatively low-affinity, high-capacity
component (Kd
1
nM, 2 x 1010 sites/µg membrane protein).
Plasma-elimination half-lives of the murine (EMD 55900) and reshaped
(EMD 72000) version were similar: short in the Cynomolgous
monkey (26 h for EMD 55900 and 31 h for EMD 72000) and long in
rats (240 h for EMD 55900 and 225 h for EMD 72000; Ref.
12
). Biodistribution studies of
125I-EMD 72000 in xenografted nude mice revealed
a tumor:blood ratio of 1:2 on day 1 and 5:1 on day 18, respectively
(12)
. TNF-
generously was provided by G. R.
Adolf, Bender (Boehringer Mannheim), Vienna, Austria.
Cell Lines.
Cell lines A431 (squamous cell carcinoma of the vulva) and Detroit 562
(squamous cell carcinoma of the pharynx) were obtained from the
American Type Culture Collection (Nr.CRL-1555 and CCL-138). For
establishing cell lines as tumors on NMRI nu/nu mice (68
weeks of age), 2 x 107
cells of A431 and Detroit 562 squamous cell carcinoma cell lines
were injected s.c.
Tumors.
Spontaneously occurring tumors derived from gynecological and head and
neck patients were established on nude mice by direct transplantation
of small tumor pieces (
2 mm) s.c. We used squamous cell carcinomas of
the larynx, pharynx, and uterine cervix. Adenocarcinomas were derived
from tumors of the mammary gland. Established tumors on nude mice were
transplanted again onto NMRI nu/nu mice as described
previously (14)
.
Treatment Course.
Xenotransplants (n = 1060) derived from squamous cell
carcinomas of the uterine cervix and vulva (n = 180), mammary adenocarcinomas (n = 420), and squamous cell carcinoma of the larynx (n = 200) and pharynx (n = 260) were
investigated. Tumor size was measured with vernier calipers every 5
days. Tumor size was calculated by the product of length x width. One week after transplantation, nude mice were
randomly divided into groups of 10 animals [(a) control
group; (b) antibody group; (c) TNF-
group; and
(d) combined treatment group]. Treatment was started when
tumors of all groups reached a mean size of 25
mm2. Typically, treatment of nude mice with EMD
55900/EMD 72000 and TNF-
consisted of a fixed regimen. Nude mice
were injected i.p. a total of two times with the monoclonal antibody at
a dose of 40 µg antibody/g body weight on days 1 and 7 of the
treatment course. This concentration of EMD 55900/EMD 72000 has been
established previously as the dose of monoclonal antibodies required
for prevention of tumor growth in the nude mouse model
(14)
. TNF-
was given five times once a day (on days
26 of the treatment course between antibody treatments) at a dose of
0.5 µg/g body weight. In the combined treatment group, animals
received the described compounds according to the regimen described
above. Controls were treated accordingly with the vehicle. The mice
were followed up for tumor growth for at least 42 days.
Analysis of EGFR Concentration.
Tissues obtained from transplanted tumors were dissected and then
pulverized in liquid N2 by a microdismembrator
(Braun, Melsungen, Germany). The tissue powder was suspended in a
phosphate buffer [0.14 M NaCl, 2.6 mM KCL, 8
mM Na2HPO4
(pH7,4), and 1% Tween 20], then homogenized in a Teflon/glass
homogenizer. Ultracentrifugation for 1 h at 100,000 x g yielded a supernatant containing the cytosolic
fraction and soluted cell membranes. Protein content was measured in
the supernatant by Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany).
The solution was normalized to a protein content of 50 µg/ml. From
each sample, 200 µl in doubles of the solution were used to measure
EGFR concentration by ELISA (Immundiagnostik, Bensheim, Germany).
Statistics.
For statistical analysis, the Kruskal-Wallis test for
k-independent samples as well as the Mann-Whitney
U test were used because of nonparametric data.
Ps were considered to be significant at
0.05.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
Monotherapy Leads to Moderate Growth Reduction.
monotherapy moderately reduces tumor size in
either high or low EGFR-expressing tumors. However, those effects were
only significant in high EGFR-expressing tumors (P < 0.01).
TNF-
Enhances Anti-EGFR Effects and Sensitizes Cancer Cells to
Antibody Treatment.
To examine whether the antitumor effects of monoclonal antibodies could
be enhanced by TNF-
, we decided to apply TNF-
to nude mice
bearing xenografts with variable concentrations of the EGFR. Antibody
application resulted in significant growth inhibition only in the high
EGFR-expressing group. In experiment G, 35 days posttreatment, tumor
size in the EMD 55900 group showed a reduction to 5% of the control
size (Fig. 1)
; in experiment A, antibody treatment reduced tumor size
to 0.025% of the control size (Fig. 3)
. In experiments B and F, antibody treatment reduced tumor size to 16%
and 22% of the control size (P < 0.001;
Figs. 4
and 5
), respectively.
|
|
|
could not enhance those
effects any further (Fig. 3)
Xenotransplants with EGFR concentrations of <70 fmol/mg were not
significantly growth-inhibited by EMD 55900 and only a little
susceptible to growth inhibition by TNF-
alone (Fig. 3)
. However,
treatment of low-EGFR-level tumors with the combination of TNF-
and
EMD 55900 showed highly significant (P < 0.001) tumor growth reduction compared with the control group. In
tumors with low EGFR-expression, combination treatment led to a
tumor size reduction of 50% of the control size (Fig. 2)
. For example,
in experiment I, which is shown in Fig. 6
, tumors were neither susceptible to treatment with EMD 55900 nor with
TNF-
, but showed a highly significant tumor growth reduction to 30%
of the control size (P < 0.0001) in response
to combination treatment, suggesting a synergistic effect between
TNF-
and anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50 fmol/mg protein occurs in 5% of those
neoplasias, whereas squamous cell carcinomas of the vulva and the
uterine cervix express the EGFR in concentrations of
50 fmol/mg in
33% and 62% of cases, respectively (14)
. In contrast,
nearly 100% of squamous cell carcinomas of the larynx and pharynx
express the EGFR in concentrations of
50 fmol/mg protein
(14)
. In this context we and others (14) could show that the growth inhibitory effects of the monoclonal antibodies EMD 55900 and EMD 72000 depend mainly on the EGFR expression value rather than on the tumor entity. Our data demonstrate a strong EGFR-dependent antitumor efficacy of both monoclonal antibodies on squamous cell carcinoma xenografts of the head and neck and the uterine cervix as well as adenocarcinomas of the mammary gland.
Therefore, we determined a cut-off level of EGFR expression (70 fmol/mg) in tumor xenografts to optimize the use of monoclonal antibodies as therapeutic agents. Carcinomas with low EGFR protein levels (<70 fmol/mg) were not susceptible to treatment with the antibodies. In contrast, carcinomas with high EGFR protein levels (>70 fmol/mg) were highly significantly growth-inhibited.
It has not been demonstrated thus far that carcinomas expressing low
levels of the EGFR also can be made susceptible to EGFR antibody
therapy. Considering earlier studies on the antitumor effects of
TNF-
(1, 2, 3
, 21, 22, 23)
, we introduced this cytokine into
our investigations to enhance antibody efficacy if antibody treatment
as monotherapy did not lead to maximum tumor size reduction. It has
been shown that EGFR expression has been increased by TNF-
via the
p55 TNF receptor (1)
. Furthermore it was demonstrable that
vascular permeability of the tumor microvasculature has been increased
by TNF-
, leading to improved uptake of monoclonal antibodies into
the tumor (4)
. It is also known that proinflammatory
cytokines such as TNF-
are able to activate a cell death program
(1
, 2)
. Therefore, apoptosis is being induced by the
TNF-
receptor through receptor clustering and stimulation of
caspases. Inhibition of these caspases suppresses TNF-
-induced
apoptosis (1)
. Recently it has been shown that TNF-
reduces EGFR tyrosine phosphorylation via stimulating a protein
tyrosine phosphatase, leading to blockade of the EGFR-mediated
signal transduction (1)
. It also has been demonstrated
that EGF inhibits TNF-
-induced apoptosis (5)
.
In conclusion, there seems to exist a sensitizing or synergistic effect
resulting from the interaction between the EGFR blocked by monoclonal
antibodies and TNF-
, resulting in tumor size reduction. The
combination treatment of monoclonal antibodies and TNF-
led to a
highly significant and synergistic tumor growth reduction in xenografts
with high EGFR expression values. However, if EMD 55900 or EMD 72000
treatment alone led to maximum tumor size reduction, additional TNF-
application could not enhance those effects any more. Xenografted
tumors with low EGFR protein concentrations (<70 fmol/mg) showed only
little tumor size reduction when treated with monoclonal antibodies or
TNF-
alone. A putative mechanism for these observations could be an
enhancement of EGFR expression induced by TNF-
resulting in
increased occupancy of EGFRs by anti-EGFR antibodies. This thesis is
supported by the fact that combination treatment led to significant
tumor size reduction, even if monotherapy of either antibodies or
TNF-
showed very little effect by itself. Therefore we hypothesize
that TNF-
leads to an increase in the vascular permeability of the
connective tissue stalk supporting the neoplastic epithelial cells of
the tumor. This could lead to an enhanced extravascular concentration
of the applied monoclonal antibodies in the tumor environment resulting
in increased occupancy of EGFRs. Furthermore the combination treatment
could lead to an increase in apoptosis of the neoplastic cells. These
mechanisms are probably predominant in tumors with low EGFR
concentration. To summarize, the observed effects of antibodies against
the EGFR can reduce tumor growth even in cancers with low EGFR
expression in the presence of cytokines like TNF-
. This may extend
EGFR antibody treatment to a broader spectrum of carcinomas and
influence future treatment protocols after our phase I/II studies with
EGFR antibodies in cancers of the head and neck and other epithelial
tumors.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 This work was supported by grants from the Georg
and Franziska Speyersche-Hochschulstiftung and the Deutsche
Forschungsgemeinschaft (BE 1068/2-1). ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at J. W. Goethe University, School of Medicine, Department
of Otorhinolaryngology, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt,
Germany. ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: TNF-
, tumor
necrosis factor
; EGFR, epidermal growth factor receptor. ![]()
4 H. G. Schnuerch, et al.,
unpublished data. ![]()
Received 3/24/00. Accepted 12/ 8/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and
-interferon enhancement of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody binding to human melanoma cells.. J. Immunother., 13: 166-174, 1993.
.. Cancer Immunol. Immunother., 47: 167-175, 1998.[Medline]
.. Cancer Res., 52: 5887-5892, 1992.This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. G. Johns, R. M. Perera, S. C. Vernes, A. A. Vitali, D. X. Cao, W. K. Cavenee, A. M. Scott, and F. B. Furnari The Efficacy of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Specific Antibodies against Glioma Xenografts Is Influenced by Receptor Levels, Activation Status, and Heterodimerization Clin. Cancer Res., March 15, 2007; 13(6): 1911 - 1925. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Francoual, M.-C. Etienne-Grimaldi, J.-L. Formento, D. Benchimol, A. Bourgeon, M. Chazal, C. Letoublon, T. Andre, N. Gilly, J.-R. Delpero, et al. EGFR in colorectal cancer: more than a simple receptor Ann. Onc., June 1, 2006; 17(6): 962 - 967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-N. U. Chen, R. L. Woodbury, L. E. Kathmann, L. K. Opresko, R. C. Zangar, H. S. Wiley, and B. D. Thrall Induced Autocrine Signaling through the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Contributes to the Response of Mammary Epithelial Cells to Tumor Necrosis Factor {alpha} J. Biol. Chem., April 30, 2004; 279(18): 18488 - 18496. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Atalay, F. Cardoso, A. Awada, and M. J. Piccart Novel therapeutic strategies targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) family and its downstream effectors in breast cancer Ann. Onc., September 1, 2003; 14(9): 1346 - 1363. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W.-H. Shen, J.-H. Zhou, S. R. Broussard, G. G. Freund, R. Dantzer, and K. W. Kelley Proinflammatory Cytokines Block Growth of Breast Cancer Cells by Impairing Signals from a Growth Factor Receptor Cancer Res., August 15, 2002; 62(16): 4746 - 4756. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |