Cancer Research Donn Young  Telomeres
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seliger, B.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seliger, B.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, C.
[Cancer Research 61, 1095-1099, February 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Immunology

Characterization of the Major Histocompatibility Complex Class I Deficiencies in B16 Melanoma Cells1

Barbara Seliger2, Ursula Wollscheid, Frank Momburg, Thomas Blankenstein and Christoph Huber

Johannes Gutenberg Universität, III. Medizinische Klinik, 55131 Mainz [B. S., U. W., C. H.]; Deutsches Krebsforschungsinstitut, 69720 Heidelberg [F. M.]; and Max Delbrück Centrum für Molekulare Medizin, 13122 Berlin, [T. B.] Germany


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The murine B16 melanoma system represents an important in vivo model for the evaluation of T cell-based immunization and vaccination strategies, although deficient MHC class I surface expression has been identified in these cells. We postulate here that the MHC class I-deficient phenotype of B16 melanoma cells is attributable to down-regulation or the loss of the expression and function of multiple components of the MHC class I antigen-processing pathway, including the peptide transporter associated with antigen processing, the proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and LMP10, PA28{alpha} and -ß, and the chaperone tapasin. In contrast, calnexin, calreticulin, ER60, and protein disulfide isomerase expression are unaltered or only marginally suppressed in these cells. The level of down-regulation of the components of the antigen-processing pathway is either transcriptionally or posttranscriptionally controlled and could be corrected in all cases by IFN-{gamma} treatment, which also reconstituted MHC class I surface expression. Thus, B16 melanoma cells can be used as a model for the characterization of the mechanisms underlying the coordinated dysregulation of the antigen-processing components, which should provide new insights into the development of tumors and the factors controlling this process.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
B16 melanoma cells have deficient MHC class I surface expression and demonstrate weak immunogenicity. Despite the same origin, several B16 melanoma sublines with different metastatic potentials and behaviors have been established (1 , 2) . In vivo studies demonstrated that immunization of C57BL/6 mice with B16 melanoma cells generated humoral rather than T-cell responses, which resulted in the development of numerous mAbs.3 These mAbs have been effectively used in the eradication of melanoma, lung, and liver metastases attributable to antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (3 , 4) . In addition, H-2 gene transfer enhances the immunogenic phenotype of B16 melanoma cells and causes their rejection in immunocompetent hosts (5 , 6) , which is associated with a complete loss of melanoma-associated antigen expression, reduced substrate adherence, the inhibition of melanogenesis, and the loss of metastatic capacity (5, 6, 7) .

Although B16 melanoma cells fail to induce strong T cell-mediated immune responses, some B16 melanoma antigen-specific T cells have also been described (8 , 9) . Adoptively transferred surrogate marker OVA-specific CD8+ T cell populations in mice bearing established OVA-transfected B16 melanoma lung metastases mediate a reduction of tumor growth and, subsequently, a prolonged survival (10) . In addition, the poorly immunogenic phenotype of B16 cells could be altered by the fusion of dendritic cells with syngeneic B16 melanoma cells (11) .

Despite these reports, the use of the H-2-deficient B16 melanoma model as a prototype for T cell-based immunotherapies independent of cross-priming has to be reconsidered (12) . Abnormalities of MHC class I surface antigens are often associated with an immune escape of tumor cells. The reduction or loss of MHC class I surface expression in human and murine tumors of distinct histologies could be attributable to structural alterations and/or dysregulation of various components of the MHC class I APM (13, 14, 15, 16) . The complexity of the MHC class I antigen pathway has been well defined in the last decade. The pathway includes four major components: (a) the multicatalytic proteasome, in particular the LMPs 2, 7, and 10, and its PAs, PA28{alpha} and -ß; (b) TAP; (c) numerous chaperones; and (d) the MHC class I molecules (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22) . Deficient expression of LMP, PA28, and TAP alters both the quality and/or quantity of the peptide repertoire presented in the context of MHC class I molecules (19) . In addition, down-regulated or a lack of tapasin expression also affects MHC class I expression (23 , 24) .

The underlying mechanism of the impaired MHC class I surface expression in B16 melanoma cells has not yet been identified. We now present evidence that the deficient H-2 expression of B16 melanoma cells is attributable to a coordinate suppression of multiple components of the MHC class I APM. These defects could be corrected by IFN-{gamma} administration, which transcriptionally induces the expression of various APM components, thereby also enhancing MHC class I surface expression in B16 cells. Thus, our data have important implications for the use of the B16 melanoma model in immunotherapeutical studies and the interpretation of their results as well as for the identification of the underlying mechanisms of the impaired expression of the antigen-processing genes.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Cell Lines and IFN-{gamma} Treatment.
Different B16 melanoma sublines with a distinct metastatic potential were established from C57BL/6 melanoma. B16F1 exhibiting a low metastatic potential was established from metastatic foci in the lung of i.v. injected B16 cells (2) . In contrast, B16F10 cells, established by 10 successive selections for lung metastases after i.v. injection, are highly metastatic. The two B16 subclones, kindly provided by I. John Fidler (MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX), RMA cells, and the respective TAP-deficient RMA-S cells, both derived from a Rauscher virus-induced T-cell lymphoma, were grown in RPMI 1640 (Seromed, Berlin, Germany) containing 10% (v/v) FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, penicillin (100 units/ml), and streptomycin (100 µg/ml; Refs. 1 and 25 ). The murine renal cell carcinoma cell line Renca was maintained in Dulbecco’s modified medium supplemented with 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, and respective antibiotics. For IFN-{gamma} stimulation, tumor cells were incubated in the presence of 20 ng/ml murine recombinant IFN-{gamma} (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) for 24–48 h at 37°C (26) .

Flow Cytometry.
The mAbs used in this study were antimouse H-2KbDb (Cedarlane, Hornby, Canada) and the FITC-conjugated goat antimouse immunoglobulin (Beckman/Coulter, Krefeld, Germany) as the secondary mAb. For staining of MHC class I antigens, cells were incubated with the primary mAb for 30 min on ice, washed twice in PBS and incubated further with a FITC-conjugated goat antimouse immunoglobulin (Coulter/Beckman, Krefeld, Germany) as a secondary mAb for an additional 30 min. After washing in PBS/1% heat-inactivated FCS, cells were analyzed on a flow cytometer (Coulter Epics XL MCL; Beckman/Coulter, Krefeld, Germany).

MHC Class I Stability Assays.
Peptide-binding assays were performed using the H-2Kb restricted peptide SIINFEKL (OVA pos 257–264) and the human HLA-A2-restricted nonsense peptide (HIV pos 476–484), as described recently by Wölfel et al. (27) . Briefly, 3 x 105 cells/well were incubated for 16 h in serum-free RPMI 1640 (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) in the presence or absence of the respective peptides (100 µM, dissolved in PBS containing 5% DMSO) with or without 2.5 µg/ml human ß2-microglobulin (Sigma, Deisenhofen, Germany), before MHC class I surface expression was determined by flow cytometry.

Stable Transfection.
The TAP1 and TAP2 expression vectors4 carrying the human TAP1 or TAP2 cDNA, respectively, under the control of the cytomegalo virus-promoter and the neoR gene as a selection marker, as well as the control vector P46 carrying the neoR gene alone, were used for stable gene transfers. Transfections were performed with 2.5 x 106 cells in a volume of 500 µl of MEM containing 1% heat-inactivated FCS and 10 µg of linearized plasmid DNA using electroporation (450V, 1200 µF, 2 µs; EPI 2500; Fischer, Heidelberg, Germany). After pulsing, the cells were plated in complete medium on Petri dishes and 48 h later, neoR cells were selected in complete RPMI 1640 containing 600 µg/ml G418 (Seromed, Berlin, Germany). Four weeks later, neoR cells were analyzed for the expression of the transgene as well as for MHC class I surface antigens.

RT-PCR Analysis.
All oligonucleotides used for PCR amplifications were purchased from Biometra (Göttingen, Germany) and are listed in Table 1Citation . For conventional RT-PCR analysis, reverse transcription was performed using 1 µg of total cellular RNA extracted by guanidinium isothiocyanate/cesium chloride preparation (28) in 22-µl reaction volume in the presence of a hexanucleotide mixture (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) and 10 units of Moloney leukemia virus reverse transcriptase (United States Biochemical, Cleveland, OH). For amplification, 2-µl aliquots of cDNA were used as a template in 50 µl of reaction buffer containing the respective concentration (pmol) of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µM deoxynucleotide triphosphate (Perkin-Elmer, Weiterstadt, Germany), the appropriate amount of 10x PCR-buffer (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and 1.5 units Taq DNA Polymerase (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) or Ampli-Taq-Gold (Perkin-Elmer). One-step PCR was performed as described recently (29) using 200 ng of total RNA. The cDNA amplifications were performed with multiple primer sets in a thermocycler (Biometra, Göttingen, Germany) with 24–35 cycles of denaturation (1 min; 95°C), specific annealing (1 min; 56°C-63°C), and elongation (1 min, 72°C). The amplification products were separated on 1–2% agarose gels, stained with ethidium bromide, and photographed under UV light. Specificity of amplification reactions was confirmed by Southern blot.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Characteristics of the primers employed for RT-PCR analyses

 
Western Blot Analysis.
Protein extracts were prepared from 1–5 x 106 cells by the standard procedure and electrophoresed (20 µg protein/lane) on 10 or 15% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were electrophoretically transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schüll, Dassel, Germany) using a tank blotter (Bio-Rad, Munich, Germany). and visualized by Ponceau S. The filters were incubated with the mAb antimouse TAP1 (1:750), antimouse TAP2 (1:250), antimouse LMP2 (1:250), and antimouse LMP7 (1:750), kindly provided by Dr. Klaus Früh (Howard Johnsson, La Jolla, CA), as well as with antimouse LMP10 (1:1000), antimouse PA28{alpha} (1:2000), and antimouse PA28ß mAb (1:1000; Affinity, Exeter, United Kingdom) at 4°C overnight and then incubated with horseradish peroxidase goat antirabbit immunoglobulin (1:1250; DAKO, Hamburg, Germany) for 60 min at room temperature. Filters were then processed using the chemiluminescence kit (ECL; Amersham, Braunschweig, Germany) and exposed to X-OMAT Blue films (Kodak, Rochester, NY). The experiments were performed at least twice.

Peptide Translocation Assay.
Cells (2.5 x 106) per incubation were harvested and washed with the incubation buffer [130 mM KCl, 10 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 2 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, and 5 mM HEPES (pH 7.3); Ref. 30 ]. Cells were permeabilized with 2 IU streptolysin O/ml (Welcome Reagent Ltd., Beckenham, United Kingdom) in 50 µl of incubation buffer for 10 min at 37°C before the addition of 10 µl ATP (10 mM; La Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), 2.5 µl of radioiodinated model peptides (peptide no. 63, RYWANATRSI; peptide no. 67, RYWANATRSF; and peptide no. 600, TNKTRIDGQY) and incubation buffer to a final volume of 100 µl. Peptide translocation was performed routinely for 15 min at 37°C. The permeabilized cells were lysed with 1 ml of NP-40 lysis mix. The glycosylated peptides within the endoplasmic reticulum were recovered with ConA-Sepharose (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) as described previously (30) .


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Association of Antigen-Processing Defects with the Lack of MHC Class I Surface Expression in B16 Cells.
Limited information is available about the mechanisms underlying the H-2-deficient phenotype of B16 melanoma cells. Because MHC class I surface expression of TAP-deficient cells can be increased and stabilized by culture at low, unphysiological temperatures or in the presence of specific MHC class I-binding peptides, we determined whether the level of MHC class I expression of two B16 cell variants, i.e., B16F1 and B16F10, could be enhanced under these culture conditions. The T-cell lymphoma cell line RMA, its antigen-processing mutant RMA-S, and the renal cell carcinoma cell line Renca served as controls. The different cell lines were incubated for 16 h in parallel at 37°C in the absence or presence of H-2-binding peptides or at 26°C before MHC class I surface expression was examined by flow cytometry. The results demonstrated that both B16 melanoma cell lines and RMA-S cells expressed barely detectable levels of H-2 antigens, whereas RMA and Renca cells expressed high levels of MHC class I surface antigens. H-2 surface expression was enhanced by neither incubation at low temperatures nor by incubation at 37°C in the presence of specific H-2-binding peptides in both B16 subclones, RMA, and Renca cells. In contrast, an increase of MHC class I antigen expression under these culture conditions was observed in the TAP2-deficient RMA-S cells (Table 2)Citation . These data suggest that decreased levels of MHC class I surface antigens in B16 melanoma cells appear to be caused not only by an impaired peptide supply in the endoplasmic reticulum but rather to be attributable to a more complex process.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 2 H-2 surface expression of B16 cells under various culture conditions

Cells were incubated in parallel at 37°C in the absence and presence of 20 ng/ml IFN-{gamma} for 48 h, in the presence of 100 µM specific H-2KbDb-binding peptide in the presence of 2.5 µg/ml human ß2-m (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) for 16 h or at 26°C for 16 h before flow cytometry was performed as described in "Material and Methods." The experiments were performed at least three times. Representative data of these independent experiments are expressed as mean specific fluorescence intensity.

 
Indeed, RT-PCR analysis revealed a significant coordinated down-regulation, or even a total inhibition, of mRNA transcription of the major components of the antigen-processing family, including the proteasome subunits LMP2, LMP7, and LMP10, the PAs PA28{alpha} and -ß, the peptide transporter TAP1, and tapasin in both B16 subclones when compared with RMA control cells (Fig. 1A)Citation . Interestingly, the steady-state mRNA levels of TAP2, calnexin, calreticulin, ER60, and protein disulfide isomerase were either unaltered or only marginally down-regulated in both B16 cell lines (Fig. 1ACitation ; data not shown).



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. RT-PCR and Western blot analysis of B16 and RMA cells for various APM components. A, total cellular RNA from untreated and IFN-{gamma}-treated (20 ng/ml; 24 h) B16F1, B16F10, and RMA cells was extracted and subjected to RT-PCR analysis. The detailed information of the primers used is listed in Table 1Citation . Amplification of the ß-actin cDNA served as internal control. B, for Western blot analysis, protein extracts (35 µg/lane) of IFN-{gamma}-treated (20 ng/ml; 48 h) and -untreated cells were used. The filters were consecutively stained with the respective mAb as described in "Materials and Methods." Both RT-PCR and Western blot analysis were performed at least twice and representative data are shown.

 
As representatively shown for B16F10 cells, Western blot analysis demonstrated a coordinated lack of protein expression of the major APM components, such as both peptide transporter subunits, LMP2, LMP7, LMP10, and PA28{alpha} and -ß (Fig. 1B)Citation . The results also suggest a differential regulation of the various APM components. The presence of normal levels of TAP2 mRNA (Fig. 1A)Citation coupled with low TAP2 protein levels (Fig. 1B)Citation appears to be attributable to either posttranscriptional down-regulation, a decrease in TAP2 translation, or TAP2 protein stability. In contrast, the lack of or low levels of steady-state mRNA and proteins for the other APM components, such as TAP1, tapasin, the LMP subunits, and PA28, may account for the transcriptional control of these components.

To examine whether the impaired TAP expression in B16 cells was directly associated with a strong suppression of the peptide transport rate, peptide translocation assays were performed. Streptolysin O-permeabilized B16 cells and respective controls (RMA, RMA-S, and Renca) were incubated in the presence and absence of ATP with three different iodinated model peptides (nos. 63, 67, and 600) carrying a glycosylation sequence, respectively. As demonstrated representatively in Fig. 2Citation , for the peptides no. 63 and no. 67, TAP function was nearly totally inhibited in the B16 subclones in the absence and presence of ATP. As expected, similar results were obtained for the TAP2-deficient RMA-S cells (data not shown). In contrast, Renca cells used as positive controls showed high levels of peptide transport in the presence of ATP (Fig. 2)Citation , which was comparable with that of RMA cells (data not shown). Similar results were obtained in translocation assays using peptide no. 600 (data not shown).



View larger version (25K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. TAP-dependent peptide translocation of input peptides. The peptides no. 63 (RYWANATRSI) and no. 67 (RYWANATRSF) were translocated in the presence and absence of ATP by streptolysin O-permeabilized tumor cells. The translocated peptides were isolated and quantitated as described in "Materials and Methods." The experiments were performed at least three times, and representative results shown in this figure are expressed as a percentage of the translocated peptides.

 
IFN-{gamma}-mediated Restoration of MHC Class I Surface Expression Attributable to Increase of the Expression of APM Components.
To investigate whether IFN-{gamma} was able to revert the deficient expression of MHC class I APM genes, the steady-state mRNA and protein levels of the various APM components in the two B16 subclones were analyzed after 24 and 48 h of IFN-{gamma} treatment, respectively. As shown in Fig. 1Citation , the mRNA and protein expression of the peptide transporter, the LMP subunits, the PAs, and/or tapasin was stimulated in the B16F1 and B16 F10 cell lines upon IFN-{gamma} administration. The IFN-{gamma}-mediated induction of these APM components was accompanied by an increase in MHC class I surface expression in both B16 subclones and in RMA and Renca cells but not in TAP2-deficient RMA-S cells (Table 1)Citation .

No Correction of MHC Class I Surface Expression by TAP Gene Transfer into B16 Cells.
To investigate whether TAP down-regulation is the major component affecting the MHC class I surface expression, TAP1 or TAP2 genes alone and in combination were stably introduced into both B16 melanoma subclones. After selection in G-418, neoR clones were analyzed for integration and expression of the transgenes by genomic and RT-PCR analysis, respectively. All neoR B16 transfectants showed both integration and expression of the TAP subunits. However, flow cytometry revealed that overexpression of TAP1 and TAP2 alone or in combination was not accompanied by an induction of H-2 antigen expression (data not shown). Because the impaired expression of MHC class I antigens could not be reconstituted by TAP gene transfer, the coordinated down-regulation of multiple APM components seems to account for the deficient levels of MHC class I antigens on B16 melanoma cells and their immune escape phenotype. The underlying mechanisms of such concordant dysregulation of APM components still have to be elucidated.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present experiments identify a combined down-regulation of multiple APM components as a strategy for the immune evasion of B16 melanoma cells. This is in line with results in human tumor cells and virus-infected cells, as well as in in vitro models of oncogenic transformation, describing LMP, PA28, TAP, and/or tapasin down-regulation combined with altered MHC class I surface expression (13, 14, 15, 16 , 23 , 26 , 31) .

A coordinated suppression of LMP, PA28, TAP, tapasin, and MHC class I heavy chain was observed in the B16 subclones (Fig. 1Citation , Table 2Citation ), but both the extent as well as the level of down-regulation of these components appear to be distinct. With the exception of TAP2 and a number of chaperones, low levels of steady-state mRNA as well as protein was found for various APM components. Transcriptional down-regulation or low mRNA stability may account for this defect. In contrast, the normal levels of TAP2 mRNA associated with low TAP2 protein levels may be attributable to a posttranscriptional or translational down-regulation or may occur at the posttranslational level (Fig. 1)Citation .

The simultaneous down-regulation involved genes not only clustered in the MHC class II locus, suggesting a general mechanism of APM-component suppression in the B16 melanoma system. Thus, the B16 melanoma model serves as an example of how tumor cells can and do avoid the host immune system. These results are in accordance with those of Johnsen et al., (32) demonstrating an impaired expression of various APM molecules in tumors of distinct origin. On the other hand, these data are in contrast with oncogene- and virus-transformed murine fibroblasts, in which a concordant lack of a few specific APM components was described, whereas the expression of other APM genes was only marginally affected or unaltered (23 , 26 , 31) . Because of the extensive defects in the B16 system, more than known previously, the generation of T-cell responses may require either the repair of the dysfunctional mechanisms, which is difficult unless the precise lesion(s) is (are) identified, or cross-priming (12) .

The underlying mechanisms of the described concordant dysregulation of APM components in B16 cells still have to be elucidated. The immune escape phenotype of B16 cells could be abolished by cytokine treatment, but not by gene transfer of one of the major APM components, the peptide transporter TAP (data not shown), as it has been shown for human tumor cells (33, 34, 35, 36) . Because the decreased expression of proteasome subunits is not likely to decrease MHC class I expression (15) , one might speculate that the defect described in B16 subclones is attributable to impaired tapasin expression.

Because of the IFN-{gamma}-mediated induction of APM components in B16 cells, the deficient expression of these genes appears to be attributable to regulatory mechanisms rather than to structural alterations (Fig. 1Citation ; Table 2Citation ). At least for TAP1 and LMP2, a concordant expression has been implemented in both human and murine cells because of a shared bidirectional promoter (37) . Although the TAP1/LMP2, LMP7, LMP10, and PA28{alpha} promoters contain different elements, the observed simultaneous down-regulation of these APM components argues for a common regulatory mechanism in B16 melanoma cells, which is presently under investigation. In addition to the IFN-{gamma}-mediated stimulation of various APM components, MHC class I surface expression was also increased upon IFN-{gamma} treatment of B16 subclones, but to a lesser extent (Table 2)Citation . These data suggest that additional regulatory factors, which are important for efficient MHC class I antigen processing and presentation, may exist. This hypothesis is also strengthened (1) by the fact that the MHC class I surface expression of B16 subclones could be enhanced by neither the incubation of cells at low temperatures nor by the addition of exogeneous MHC class I-binding peptides (Table 2Citation ; Ref. 2 ) and by the partial reconstitution of the MHC class I surface expression in adenovirus 12-transformed fibroblasts after the gene transfer of deficient APM components (31) . In addition, the induction of APM component expression upon IFN-{gamma} treatment may affect the H-2-deficient phenotype of B16 cells by altering the quality and quantity of generated antigenic peptides. Immunization with B16 cells stably transfected with the IFN-{gamma} gene alone, or particularly in combination with H-2 genes, induced cytotoxic T-cell responses, a longer survival, and a significant inhibition of metastasis formation (5 , 6 , 38) . However, these CD8+ cytotoxic T lymphocytes may not be directed solely against the peptide repertoire presented by unmodified B16 cells.

Because of the extensive defects, more than known previously, T cell-based immunotherapy in the B16 system is much more difficult than expected. The generation of T-cell responses and an effective antitumor immunity may require the correction of the underlying dysfunction, e.g., by IFN-{gamma}. Thus, given the presence of the deficiencies in the antigen-processing pathway, the B16 melanoma cells should not be used as a prototype for vaccination and immunization strategies, or, at least, investigators using this model must be aware of its demanding nature. A complete understanding of the processes involved in APM suppression of B16 cells will provide new insights into the molecular mechanisms of immune escape as well as into the possibilities of how to repair those pathways. In this respect, B16 melanoma cells represent an excellent model system to study the regulation of APM components, to identify new factors involved in this process, and to optimize the effectivity of immunotherapy in correcting these defects.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Drs. Thomas Spies for the TAP1 and TAP2 plasmids, Klaus Früh for antisera against mouse TAP1/2, LMP2, and LMP7, and Dirk Jung for constructing the TAP expression vectors.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by a grant from the Sonderforschungbereich 311 and 432 projects C8 and A5. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Johannes Gutenberg University, III. Department of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. Phone: 0049-6131-176760; Fax: 0049-6131-176678; E-mail: B.Seliger{at}3-med.klinik.uni-mainz.de Back

3 Abbreviations used are: mAb, monoclonal antibody; APM, antigen-processing machinery; OVA, ovalbumin; LMP, low molecular weight protein; neoR, neomycin resistance; RT-PCR, reverse transcription-PCR; PA, proteasome activator; TAP, transporter associated with antigen processing. Back

4 Jung and Seliger, unpublished observations. Back

Received 4/19/00. Accepted 11/29/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Fidler I. J. Selection of successive tumor lines for metastasis.. Nat. New Biol., 242: 148-149, 1973.[Medline]
  2. Poste G., Doll J., Hart I. R., Fidler I. J. In vitro selection of murine B16 melanoma variants with enhanced tissue-invasive properties.. Cancer Res., 40: 1636-1644, 1980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Eisenthal A., Lafreniere R., Letor A., Rosenberg S. Effect of anti-B16 melanoma monoclonal antibody on established murine B16 melanoma liver metastases.. Cancer Res., 47: 7140-7145, 1987.
  4. Hearing V. J., Leong S. P., Vieira W., Law L. W. Suppression of established pulmonary metastases by murine melanoma-specific monoclonal antibodies.. Int. J. Cancer, 47: 148-153, 1991.[Medline]
  5. Gorelik E., Jay G., Kwiatkowski B., Herberman R. Increased sensitivity to MHC-nonrestricted lysis of BL6 melanoma cells by transfection with class I H-2Kb gene.. J. Immunol., 145: 1621-1632, 1990.[Abstract]
  6. Li M., Muller J., Xu F., Hearing V. J., Gorelik E. Inhibition of melanoma-associated antigen expression and ecotropic retrovirus production in B16BL6 melanoma cells transfected with major histocompatibility complex class I genes.. Cancer Res., 56: 4464-4474, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Gorelik E., Gunji Y., Herberman R. H-2 antigen expression and NK sensitivity of BL6 melanoma cell.. J. Immunol., 140: 2096-2102, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Itoh T., Storkus W. J., Gorelik E., Lotze M. T. Partial purification of murine tumor-associated peptide epitopes common to histologically distinct tumors, melanoma and sarcoma, that are presented by H-2Kb molecules and recognized by CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes.. J. Immunol., 153: 1202-1215, 1994.[Abstract]
  9. Harada M., Tamada K., Abe K., Yasumoto K., Kimura G., Nomoto K. Role of the endogenous production of interleukin 12 in immunotherapy.. Cancer Res., 58: 3073-3077, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Dobrzanski M. J., Reome J. B., Dutton R. W. Therapeutic effects of tumor-reactive type 1 and type 2 CD8+ T cell subpopulations in established pulmonary metastases.. J. Immunol., 162: 6671-6678, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Wang J., Saffold S., Cao Y., Krauss J., Chen W. Eliciting T cell immunity against poorly immunogenic tumors by immunization with dendritic cell-tumor fusion vaccines.. J. Immunol., 161: 5516-5524, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Dranoff G., Jaffee E., Lazenby A., Golumbek P., Levitsky H., Brose K., Jackson V., Hamada H., Pardoll D., Mulligan R. C. Vaccination with irradiated tumor cells engineered to secrete murine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates potent, specific, and long-lasting anti-tumor immunity.. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 3539-3543, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Garrido F., Ruiz-Cabello F., Cabrera T., Perez-Villar J. J., Lopez-Botet M., Duggan-Keen M., Stern P. L. Implication for immunosurveillance of altered HLA class I phenotypes in human tumours.. Immunol. Today, 18: 89-95, 1997.[Medline]
  14. Goodenow R., Vogel J., Linsk R. Histocompatibility antigens on murine tumors.. Science (Washington DC), 230: 777-783, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Seliger B., Maeurer M. J., Ferrone S. TAP off–tumors on. Immunol. Today, 18: 1997a292-299, [Medline]
  16. Ferrone S., Marincola F. M. Loss of HLA class I antigens by melanoma cells: molecular mechanisms, functional significance and clinical relevance.. Immunol. Today, 16: 487-494, 1995.[Medline]
  17. Koopmann J-O., Hämmerling G. J., Momburg F. Generation, intracellular transport and loading of peptides associated with MHC class I molecules.. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 9: 80-88, 1997.[Medline]
  18. Lehner P. J., Cresswell P. Processing and delivery of peptides presented by MHC class I molecules.. Curr. Opin. Immunol., 8: 59-67, 1996.[Medline]
  19. Groettrupp M., Soza A., Kuckelhorn U., Kloetzel P. M. Peptide antigen production by the proteasome: complexity provides efficiency.. Immunol. Today, 17: 429-435, 1996.[Medline]
  20. Spies T., Bresnahan M., Bahram S., Arnold D., Blanck G., Mellins E., Pious D., De Mars R. T. A gene in the human major histocompatibility complex class II region controlling the class I antigen presentation pathway.. Nature (Lond.), 348: 744-747, 1990.[Medline]
  21. Hammond C., Helenius A. Quality control in the secretory pathway.. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 7: 523-529, 1995.[Medline]
  22. Sadasivan B., Lehner P. J., Ortmann B., Spies T., Cresswell P. Roles for calreticulin and a novel glycoprotein, tapasin, in the interaction of MHC class I molecules with TAP.. Immunity, 5: 103-114, 1996.[Medline]
  23. Bennett E. M., Bennink J. R., Yewdell J. W., Brodsky F. M. Cutting edge: adenovirus E19 has two mechanisms for affecting class I MHC expression.. J. Immunol., 162: 5049-5052, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Schoenhals G. J., Krishna R. M., Grandea A. G., III, Spies T., Peterson P. A., Yang Y., Früh K. Retention of empty MHC class I molecules by tapasin is essential to reconstitute antigen presentation in invertebrate cells.. EMBO J., 18: 743-753, 1999.[Medline]
  25. Ljunggren H. G., Kärre K. Host resistance directed selectively against H-2 deficient lymphoma variants.. J. Exp. Med., 162: 1745-1759, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Seliger B., Harders C., Lohmann S., Momburg F., Urlinger S., Tampé R., Huber C. Down-regulation of the MHC class I antigen-processing machinery after oncogenic transformation of murine fibroblasts.. Eur. J. Immunol., 28: 122-133, 1998.[Medline]
  27. Wölfel T., Van Pel A., Brichard V., Schneider J., Seliger B. , Meyer zum Büschenfelde, K-H., and Boon, T.. Two tyrosinase nonapeptides recognized on HLA-A2 melanomas by autologous cytolytic T-lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol., 24: 759-764, 1994.
  28. Chirgwin J. M., Przybyla A. E., MacDonald R. J., Rutter W. Isolation of biologically active ribonucleic acid from sources enriched in ribonuclease.. Biochemistry, 18: 5294-5299, 1979.[Medline]
  29. Neumann E., Engelsberg A., Decker J., Störkel S., Jaeger E., Huber C., Seliger B. Heterogenous expression of the tumor-associated antigens RAGE-1, PRAME, and glycoprotein 75 in human renal cell carcinoma: candidates for T cell-based immunotherapies?. Cancer Res., 58: 4090-4095, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Neefjes J. J., Momburg F., Hämmerling G. J. Selective and ATP-dependent translocation of peptides by MHC-encoded transporter.. Science (Washington DC), 261: 769-771, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Rotem-Yehudar R., Groettrup M., Soza A., Kloetzel P., Ehrlich R. LMP-associated proteolytic activities and TAP-dependent peptide transport for class I MHC molecules are suppressed in cell lines transformed by the highly oncogenic adenovirus 12.. J. Exp. Med., 183: 499-514, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Johnsen A., France J., Sy M. S., Harding C. V. Down-regulation of the transporter for antigen presentation, proteasome subunits, and class I major histocompatibility complex in tumor cell lines.. Cancer Res., 58: 3660-3667, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Eppersson D. E., Arnold D., Spies T., Cresswell P., Pober J. S., Johnson D. R. Cytokines increase transporter in antigen processing-1 expression more rapidly than HLA class I expression in endothelial cells.. J. Immunol., 149: 3297-3301, 1992.[Abstract]
  34. Seliger B., Hammers S., Höhne A., Zeidler R., Knuth A., Gerharz C-D., Huber C. IFN-{gamma}-mediated coordinated transcriptional regulation of the human TAP1 and LMP2 genes in human renal cell carcinoma.. Clin. Cancer Res., 3: 573-578, 1997.[Abstract]
  35. Restifo N. P., Esquivel F., Kawakami Y., Yewdell J. W., Mule J., Rosenberg S. A., Bennink J. R. Identification of human cancers deficient in antigen processing.. J. Exp. Med., 177: 265-272, 1993.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Kallfelz M., Jung D., Hilmes C., Knuth A., Jaeger E., Huber C., Seliger B. Induction of immunogenecity of a human renal-cell carcinoma cell line by TAP1 gene transfer.. Int. J. Cancer, 81: 125-133, 1999.[Medline]
  37. Wright K. L., White L. C., Kelly A., Beck S., Trowsdale J., Ting J. P. Y. Coordinate regulation of the human TAP-1 and LMP-2 genes from a shared bidirectional promoter.. J. Exp. Med., 181: 1459-1471, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  38. Lim Y. S., Kang B. Y., Kim E. J., Kim S. H., Hwang S. Y., Kim T. S. Augmentation of therapeutic antitumor immunity by B16F10 melanoma cells transfected by interferon {gamma} and allogeneic MHC class I cDNAs.. Mol. Cells, 8: 629-636, 1998.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
I. Pellicciotta, X. Cortez-Gonzalez, R. Sasik, Y. Reiter, G. Hardiman, P. Langlade-Demoyen, and M. Zanetti
Presentation of Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase, a Self-Tumor Antigen, is Down-regulated by Histone Deacetylase Inhibition
Cancer Res., October 1, 2008; 68(19): 8085 - 8093.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. D. Pavelko, K. L. Heckman, M. J. Hansen, and L. R. Pease
An Effective Vaccine Strategy Protective against Antigenically Distinct Tumor Variants
Cancer Res., April 1, 2008; 68(7): 2471 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Lou, G. Basha, R. P. Seipp, B. Cai, S. S. Chen, A. R. Moise, A. P. Jeffries, R. S. Gopaul, T. Z. Vitalis, and W. A. Jefferies
Combining the Antigen Processing Components TAP and Tapasin Elicits Enhanced Tumor-Free Survival
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2008; 14(5): 1494 - 1501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp. Biol. Med.Home page
J. N. Kochenderfer and R. E. Gress
A Comparison and Critical Analysis of Preclinical Anticancer Vaccination Strategies
Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2007; 232(9): 1130 - 1141.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
T. W. Kim, T. Y. Lee, H. C. Bae, J. H. Hahm, Y. H. Kim, C. Park, T. H. Kang, C. J. Kim, M. H. Sung, and H. Poo
Oral Administration of High Molecular Mass Poly-{gamma}-Glutamate Induces NK Cell-Mediated Antitumor Immunity
J. Immunol., July 15, 2007; 179(2): 775 - 780.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
P. Zhang, A. L. Cote, V. C. de Vries, E. J. Usherwood, and M. J. Turk
Induction of Postsurgical Tumor Immunity and T-Cell Memory by a Poorly Immunogenic Tumor
Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6468 - 6476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. N. Kochenderfer, J. L. Simpson, C. D. Chien, and R. E. Gress
Vaccination regimens incorporating CpG-containing oligodeoxynucleotides and IL-2 generate antigen-specific antitumor immunity from T-cell populations undergoing homeostatic peripheral expansion after BMT
Blood, July 1, 2007; 110(1): 450 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. N. Kochenderfer, C. D. Chien, J. L. Simpson, and R. E. Gress
Synergism between CpG-Containing Oligodeoxynucleotides and IL-2 Causes Dramatic Enhancement of Vaccine-Elicited CD8+ T Cell Responses
J. Immunol., December 15, 2006; 177(12): 8860 - 8873.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
X.-Y. Wang, H. Arnouk, X. Chen, L. Kazim, E. A. Repasky, and J. R. Subjeck
Extracellular Targeting of Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Glucose-Regulated Protein 170 Enhances Tumor Immunity to a Poorly Immunogenic Melanoma
J. Immunol., August 1, 2006; 177(3): 1543 - 1551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. A. McWilliams, S. M. McGurran, S. W. Dow, J. E. Slansky, and R. M. Kedl
A Modified Tyrosinase-Related Protein 2 Epitope Generates High-Affinity Tumor-Specific T Cells but Does Not Mediate Therapeutic Efficacy in an Intradermal Tumor Model
J. Immunol., July 1, 2006; 177(1): 155 - 161.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. Lasfar, A. Lewis-Antes, S. V. Smirnov, S. Anantha, W. Abushahba, B. Tian, K. Reuhl, H. Dickensheets, F. Sheikh, R. P. Donnelly, et al.
Characterization of the Mouse IFN-{lambda} Ligand-Receptor System: IFN-{lambda}s Exhibit Antitumor Activity against B16 Melanoma.
Cancer Res., April 15, 2006; 66(8): 4468 - 4477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. F. Setiadi, M. D. David, S. S. Chen, J. Hiscott, and W. A. Jefferies
Identification of Mechanisms Underlying Transporter Associated with Antigen Processing Deficiency in Metastatic Murine Carcinomas
Cancer Res., August 15, 2005; 65(16): 7485 - 7492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
C. Blank, I. Brown, A. K. Kacha, M. A. Markiewicz, and T. F. Gajewski
ICAM-1 Contributes to but Is Not Essential for Tumor Antigen Cross-Priming and CD8+ T Cell-Mediated Tumor Rejection In Vivo
J. Immunol., March 15, 2005; 174(6): 3416 - 3420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. De Palma, I. Marigo, F. Del Galdo, C. De Santo, P. Serafini, S. Cingarlini, T. Tuting, J. Lenz, G. Basso, G. Milan, et al.
Therapeutic Effectiveness of Recombinant Cancer Vaccines Is Associated with a Prevalent T-Cell Receptor {alpha} Usage by Melanoma-specific CD8+ T Lymphocytes
Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 64(21): 8068 - 8076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Leukoc. Biol.Home page
S. E. Finkelstein, D. M. Heimann, C. A. Klebanoff, P. A. Antony, L. Gattinoni, C. S. Hinrichs, L. N. Hwang, D. C. Palmer, P. J. Spiess, D. R. Surman, et al.
Bedside to bench and back again: how animal models are guiding the development of new immunotherapies for cancer
J. Leukoc. Biol., August 1, 2004; 76(2): 333 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
J. Leitch, K. Fraser, C. Lane, K. Putzu, G. J. Adema, Q.-J. Zhang, W. A. Jefferies, J. L. Bramson, and Y. Wan
CTL-Dependent and -Independent Antitumor Immunity Is Determined by the Tumor Not the Vaccine
J. Immunol., May 1, 2004; 172(9): 5200 - 5205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. Blank, I. Brown, A. C. Peterson, M. Spiotto, Y. Iwai, T. Honjo, and T. F. Gajewski
PD-L1/B7H-1 Inhibits the Effector Phase of Tumor Rejection by T Cell Receptor (TCR) Transgenic CD8+ T Cells
Cancer Res., February 1, 2004; 64(3): 1140 - 1145.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. M. Prins, S. K. Odesa, and L. M. Liau
Immunotherapeutic Targeting of Shared Melanoma-Associated Antigens in a Murine Glioma Model
Cancer Res., December 1, 2003; 63(23): 8487 - 8491.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JEMHome page
W. W. Overwijk, M. R. Theoret, S. E. Finkelstein, D. R. Surman, L. A. de Jong, F. A. Vyth-Dreese, T. A. Dellemijn, P. A. Antony, P. J. Spiess, D. C. Palmer, et al.
Tumor Regression and Autoimmunity after Reversal of a Functionally Tolerant State of Self-reactive CD8+ T Cells
J. Exp. Med., August 18, 2003; 198(4): 569 - 580.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Immunol.Home page
E. Y. Chiang, M. Henson, and I. Stroynowski
Correction of Defects Responsible for Impaired Qa-2 Class Ib MHC Expression on Melanoma Cells Protects Mice from Tumor Growth
J. Immunol., May 1, 2003; 170(9): 4515 - 4523.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. Duguay, F. Mercier, J. Stagg, D. Martineau, J. Bramson, M. Servant, R. Lin, J. Galipeau, and J. Hiscott
In Vivo Interferon Regulatory Factor 3 Tumor Suppressor Activity in B16 Melanoma Tumors
Cancer Res., September 15, 2002; 62(18): 5148 - 5152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
Y. Sun, A. J. A. M. Sijts, M. Song, K. Janek, A. K. Nussbaum, S. Kral, M. Schirle, S. Stevanovic, A. Paschen, H. Schild, et al.
Expression of the Proteasome Activator PA28 Rescues the Presentation of a Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte Epitope on Melanoma Cells
Cancer Res., May 1, 2002; 62(10): 2875 - 2882.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
T. Hayashi and D. L. Faustman
Development of Spontaneous Uterine Tumors in Low Molecular Mass Polypeptide-2 Knockout Mice
Cancer Res., January 1, 2002; 62(1): 24 - 27.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Seliger, B.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Seliger, B.
Right arrow Articles by Huber, C.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online