| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
Advances in Brief |
Human Genetics Research Division [S. Y., S. D., S. J. T., I. D., W. M. H.] and Medical Statistics Group [R. M. P.], University of Southampton School of Medicine, and Department of Histopathology, Southampton University Hospitals NHS Trust [A. C. B., J. M. T.], Southampton, United Kingdom
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Tumor Histopathology Data.
Histopathological prognostic features of each case were assessed as
defined in the literature and used in previous studies (7
, 8) . Radial growth phase CMMs were defined as those
limited in extent to the epidermis (melanoma in situ) or
showing early invasion of the upper dermis but with dermal nests of
melanocytes no larger than those at the dermoepidermal junction and
containing no mitotic figures. Vertical growth phase CMM showed
expansive growth within the dermis, evidenced by nests of
neoplastic melanocytes that were larger than those at the
dermoepidermal junction or by the presence of mitotic figures
within dermally located melanocytes (8)
. For vertical
growth phase CMM, the mitotic count/mm2 of
tumor was assessed as nil, 16, or >6, and the number of
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes was evaluated as absent,
nonbrisk/focal, or brisk (8)
. The presence of tumor
regression, defined as segmental tumor loss, was also recorded.
Clinical Follow-up Data.
The following variables were recorded for each patient, subject to
availability of clinical data: (a) gender; (b)
age; (c) site of CMM; (d) length of clinical
follow-up; (e) presence of recurrent or metastatic tumor;
(f) disease-free survival; and (g) overall
survival time. The clinicopathological stage of each patient at initial
presentation for whom full data were available was calculated using the
Tumor-Node-Metastasis system (9)
.
Controls.
Controls consisted of stored DNA samples derived from 142 cadaveric and
noncadaveric solid organ and bone marrow donors. All patients and
donors were Caucasian.
Preparation of DNA Samples
DNA was extracted from Formalin-fixed, paraffin wax-embedded
tissue blocks from CMM patients as described previously (7
, 10)
. Briefly, two to five 20-µm sections were cut from each
tissue block and dewaxed in xylene (Merck, Ltd., Poole, United Kingdom)
and xylene-ethanol washes. DNA was extracted from the resulting
cellular material by proteinase-K digestion. Control DNA samples were
originally prepared from peripheral blood by standard
salt-precipitation protocols (11)
.
Determination of Genotypes
A recently published method was used to determine the genotypes
of the subjects (12)
. Briefly, PCR was carried out in a
total volume of 25 µl containing 50 ng of genomic DNA; 10 pmol of the
forward and reverse primers (5'-TCGTGAGAATGTCTTCCCATT-3' and
5'-TCTTGGATTGATTTGAG- ATAAGTGAAATC-3', respectively); 200
mM each dATP, dCTP, dGTP and dTTP; 20 mM
Tris-HCl (pH 8.4); 50 mM KCl; 0.05% (v/v) W1 (Life
Technologies, Inc.); 1.5 mM MgCl2;
and 1 unit Taq polymerase (Life Technologies, Inc.). The solution was
overlaid with 25 µl of liquid paraffin and incubated for 1 min at
95°C, and then by 35 cycles of 30 s at 95°C, 30 s at
55°C, and 30 s at 72°C. A 15-µl aliquot of PCR products was
mixed with a 5-µl solution containing 2 µl of 10x NEBuffer 2 [50
mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 10 mM
MgCl2, and 1 mM DTT (pH 7.9)], 0.2
µl of BSA (10 mg/ml), 0.3 µl Xmn I (20 units/ml), and
2.5 µl of sterile deionized H2O. The
5-µl aliquot of the digests was mixed with 2 µl of loading buffer
and electrophoresed on a 10% horizontal nondenaturing polyacrylamide
gel at 150 V for 2.5 h. The gel was then stained with Vistra Green
(Amersham) and scanned with a fluorimager (FI595; Molecular
Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA).
Statistical Analyses
Differences in genotype and allele frequencies between the
patients and the healthy British Caucasian controls were tested using
2 analyses. Genotype and allele frequencies
were compared similarly between British Caucasian and Japanese healthy
subjects (latter frequencies derived from the literature
(13)
. Odds ratios and asymptotic confidence intervals were
calculated. Genotype frequencies were also compared within patient
subgroups according to tumor growth phase, Breslow depth (invasive
CMM), mitotic index (vertical growth phase CMM), clinicopathological
phase at presentation, and the presence of disease
recurrence/metastasis. Disease-free survival according to genotype was
displayed graphically among surgically treated subjects using
Kaplan-Meier curves. Relative hazards between genotypes and their
associated 95% confidence intervals were estimated within a Cox
regression model, and differences between genotypes were tested from
the log likelihood ratio. Survival analysis was carried out within
Stata.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
MMP-1 Genotype and Invasiveness of Melanoma.
In the CMM patients, there was an association between the 2G
allele and deep invasive tumors; 34% of patients with vertical growth
phase lesions were homozygous for the 2G allele compared
with 17% of patients with horizontal growth phase lesions
(P = 0.0333; Table 2
).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
510% of all cases being familial (14)
. In
nonfamilial CMM cases, both susceptibility to and prognosis in this
malignancy have been shown to be influenced by human leukocyte
antigen DQB1 polymorphisms (7)
or
DQB1-associated haplotypes (15)
, although other
nonimmunogenetic factors have also been implicated (4, 5, 6)
.
The most important prognostic factor is stage at time of presentation,
and a melanoma is most capable of being cured by surgical excision when
it is at the superficial stage ("radial" growth phase CMM,
as opposed to vertical growth phase CMM; Ref. 16
). Radial
growth phase CMMs exist solely within the epidermis or may contain
small numbers of nondividing cells within the superficial dermis.
Vertical growth phase CMMs contain neoplastic melanocytes actively
growing within the dermis and possess the capability to metastasize to
regional lymph nodes and distant organs. In vertical growth phase CMMs,
prognosis is also influenced by the depth of invasion of the lesion
(Breslow depth and Clarkes level), the mitotic index and presence of
tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes within the dermal component, and the
presence or absence of tumor regression (8)
. Several MMPs, including MMP-1, are expressed in cutaneous melanomas, and it has been demonstrated that these MMPs play a role in melanoma cell invasion with overexpression being associated with metastasis and unfavorable prognosis (17, 18, 19) . As mentioned above, the MMP-1 gene variation investigated in this study has been shown previously to have an allele-specific effect on the levels of MMP expression in cultured melanoma cells (3) . It has also been reported that ovarian tumor and endometrial cancer tissues from patients carrying the 2G allele contain higher levels of MMP-1 transcripts compared with those from patients not carrying this allele (13 , 20) . In a recent Japanese study of ovarian cancer, the proportion of patients who carried the 2G allele was significantly higher than in the control subjects, suggesting that individuals carrying the 2G allele are genetically predisposed to the development of ovarian cancer (13) . In our study, no difference in MMP-1 genotype frequency between CMM patients and healthy subjects was detected. This may indicate a difference in genetic risk factors between melanoma and ovarian cancer or a difference in genetic risk factors for cancers between Orientals and Caucasians. It was noted that the MMP-1 genotype frequencies within our healthy Caucasian control population differed significantly from those within the healthy Japanese subjects used in a previous study (13) .
The association of the 2G allele of the MMP-1 gene with vertical growth phase CMM and the trend toward lower survival rate observed in this study is consistent with the hypothesis that variation in MMP genes can influence the potential for tumor invasion and metastasis through modulation of the expression and/or activity of these extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes. No associations were demonstrable between MMP-1 genotype and the histopathological markers of prognosis in vertical growth phase CMM that we examined. Histological features such as Breslow depth, mitotic index, and the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes have been proven to correlate with prognosis in vertical growth phase CMM (8) . Therefore, examination of a larger patient series may be required to investigate potential associations between MMP-1 genotype and both these more detailed histological features and clinical outcome.
To our knowledge, this is the first report of a study of a naturally occurring variant in an MMP gene in relation to the invasiveness of carcinoma. The data generated in this study support the hypothesis that variation in the MMP-1 gene influences the potential for invasion and metastasis of CMM through modulation of the expression of this matrix-degrading enzyme.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
1 S. Y. thanks the British Heart Foundation for
support on studies of MMP genes (PG/98183 and PG/98192).
This work was also supported by a research grant to W. M. H.,
A. C. B., and J. M. T. from the Association for International
Cancer Research, St. Andrews, Scotland (99-121). I. D. is a Lister
Institute Research Professor and thanks the United Kingdom MRC (Program
Grant G9828424) and the Wessex Medical Trust for support for
facilities. ![]()
2 To whom requests for reprints should be
addressed, at Human Genetics, Duthie Building (Mailpoint 808),
Southampton General Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD,
United Kingdom. Phone: 44 (0) 23-8079-4929; Fax:
44 (0) 23-8079-4264; E-mail: Shu.Ye{at}soton.ac.uk ![]()
3 The abbreviations used are: MMP, matrix
metalloproteinase; G, guanine; CMM, cutaneous malignant melanoma. ![]()
Received 8/17/00. Accepted 12/20/00.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Peng, L. Cao, W. Wang, L. Xian, D. Jiang, J. Zhao, Z. Zhang, X. Wang, and L. Yu Polymorphisms in the promoter regions of matrix metalloproteinases 1 and 3 and cancer risk: a meta-analysis of 50 case-control studies Mutagenesis, October 20, 2009; (2009) gep041v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Sauter, A. Rosenberger, L. Beckmann, S. Kropp, K. Mittelstrass, M. Timofeeva, G. Wolke, A. Steinwachs, D. Scheiner, E. Meese, et al. Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) Is Associated with Early-Onset Lung Cancer Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2008; 17(5): 1127 - 1135. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Decock, J.-R. Long, R. C. Laxton, X.-O. Shu, C. Hodgkinson, W. Hendrickx, E. G. Pearce, Y.-T. Gao, A. C. Pereira, R. Paridaens, et al. Association of Matrix Metalloproteinase-8 Gene Variation with Breast Cancer Prognosis Cancer Res., November 1, 2007; 67(21): 10214 - 10221. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Steagall, C. G. Glasgow, O. M. Hathaway, N. A. Avila, A. M. Taveira-DaSilva, A. Rabel, M. P. Stylianou, J.-P. Lin, X. Chen, and J. Moss Genetic and morphologic determinants of pneumothorax in lymphangioleiomyomatosis Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, September 1, 2007; 293(3): L800 - L808. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. G. Pearce, R. C. Laxton, A. C. Pereira, and S. Ye Haplotype Effects on Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Gene Promoter Activity in Cancer Cells Mol. Cancer Res., March 1, 2007; 5(3): 221 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sugimoto, S. Yoshida, S. Kennedy, M. Deguchi, N. Ohara, and T. Maruo Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 and -9 Promoter Polymorphisms and Endometrial Carcinoma Risk in a Japanese Population Reproductive Sciences, October 1, 2006; 13(7): 523 - 529. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. K. Nelson, S. Subbaram, K. M. Connor, J. Dasgupta, X.-F. Ha, T.-C. Meng, N. K. Tonks, and J. A. Melendez Redox-dependent Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Expression Is Regulated by JNK through Ets and AP-1 Promoter Motifs J. Biol. Chem., May 19, 2006; 281(20): 14100 - 14110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Fang, X. Jin, R. Wang, Y. Li, W. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Wang, D. Wen, L. Wei, and J. Zhang Polymorphisms in the MMP1 and MMP3 promoter and non-small cell lung carcinoma in North China Carcinogenesis, February 1, 2005; 26(2): 481 - 486. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Zinzindohoue, T. Lecomte, J.-M. Ferraz, A.-M. Houllier, P.-H. Cugnenc, A. Berger, H. Blons, and P. Laurent-Puig Prognostic Significance of MMP-1 and MMP-3 Functional Promoter Polymorphisms in Colorectal Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., January 15, 2005; 11(2): 594 - 599. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.J. BISSELL, P.A. KENNY, and D.C. RADISKY Microenvironmental Regulators of Tissue Structure and Function Also Regulate Tumor Induction and Progression: The Role of Extracellular Matrix and Its Degrading Enzymes Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol, January 1, 2005; 70(0): 343 - 356. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-C. Fong, C. M. Dutton, S. S. Cha, N. Garamszegi, F. H. Sim, and S. P. Scully Absence of a Correlation between the Presence of a Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 Promoter and Outcome in Patients of Chondrosarcoma Clin. Cancer Res., November 1, 2004; 10(21): 7329 - 7334. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Yu, Y. Zhou, X. Miao, P. Xiong, W. Tan, and D. Lin Functional Haplotypes in the Promoter of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Predict Risk of the Occurrence and Metastasis of Esophageal Cancer Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7622 - 7628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhou, C. Yu, X. Miao, W. Tan, G. Liang, P. Xiong, T. Sun, and D. Lin Substantial reduction in risk of breast cancer associated with genetic polymorphisms in the promoters of the matrix metalloproteinase-2 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 genes Carcinogenesis, March 1, 2004; 25(3): 399 - 404. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ghilardi, M. L. Biondi, M. Erario, E. Guagnellini, and R. Scorza Colorectal Carcinoma Susceptibility and Metastases Are Associated with Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 Promoter Polymorphisms Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1940 - 1942. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. M. Wenham, B. Calingaert, S. Ali, K. McClean, R. Whitaker, R. Bentley, J. M. Lancaster, J. Schildkraut, J. Marks, and A. Berchuck Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Gene Promoter Polymorphism and Risk of Ovarian Cancer Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2003; 10(6): 381 - 387. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Miao, C. Yu, W. Tan, P. Xiong, G. Liang, W. Lu, and D. Lin A Functional Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 Gene Promoter (-1306C/T) Is Associated with Risk of Development but not Metastasis of Gastric Cardia Adenocarcinoma Cancer Res., July 15, 2003; 63(14): 3987 - 3990. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. A. Wyatt, C. I. Coon, J. J. Gibson, and C. E. Brinckerhoff Potential for the 2G Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Promoter of Matrix Metalloproteinase to Enhance Gene Expression in Normal Stromal Cells Cancer Res., December 15, 2002; 62(24): 7200 - 7202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Ghilardi, M. L. Biondi, M. Caputo, S. Leviti, M. DeMonti, E. Guagnellini, and R. Scorza A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase-3 Promoter Enhances Breast Cancer Susceptibility Clin. Cancer Res., December 1, 2002; 8(12): 3820 - 3823. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Joos, J.-Q. He, M. B. Shepherdson, J. E. Connett, N. R. Anthonisen, P. D. Pare, and A. J. Sandford The role of matrix metalloproteinase polymorphisms in the rate of decline in lung function Hum. Mol. Genet., March 1, 2002; 11(5): 569 - 576. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Zhu, M. R. Spitz, L. Lei, G. B. Mills, and X. Wu A Single Nucleotide Polymorphism in the Matrix Metalloproteinase-1 Promoter Enhances Lung Cancer Susceptibility Cancer Res., November 1, 2001; 61(21): 7825 - 7829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Zhang, S. Dhillon, I. Geary, W. M. Howell, F. Iannotti, I. N.M. Day, and S. Ye Polymorphisms in Matrix Metalloproteinase-1, -3, -9, and -12 Genes in Relation to Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Stroke, September 1, 2001; 32(9): 2198 - 2202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Cancer Research | Clinical Cancer Research |
| Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention | Molecular Cancer Therapeutics |
| Molecular Cancer Research | Cancer Prevention Research |
| Cancer Prevention Journals Portal | Cancer Reviews Online |
| Annual Meeting Education Book | Meeting Abstracts Online |