Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2010  EMT and Cancer Progression and Treatment
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pihan, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Doxsey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pihan, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Doxsey, S. J.
[Cancer Research 61, 2212-2219, March 1, 2001]
© 2001 American Association for Cancer Research


Tumor Biology

Centrosome Defects Can Account for Cellular and Genetic Changes That Characterize Prostate Cancer Progression1

German A. Pihan2, Aruna Purohit, Janice Wallace, Raji Malhotra, Lance Liotta and Stephen J. Doxsey2

Department of Pathology [G. A. P., J. W., R. M.] and Program in Molecular Medicine [A. P., S. J. D.], University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, and Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland 20892 [L. L.]


    ABSTRACT
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Factors that determine the biological and clinical behavior of prostate cancer are largely unknown. Prostate tumor progression is characterized by changes in cellular architecture, glandular organization, and genomic composition. These features are reflected in the Gleason grade of the tumor and in the development of aneuploidy. Cellular architecture and genomic stability are controlled in part by centrosomes, organelles that organize microtubule arrays including mitotic spindles. Here we demonstrate that centrosomes are structurally and numerically abnormal in the majority of prostate carcinomas. Centrosome abnormalities increase with increasing Gleason grade and with increasing levels of genomic instability. Selective induction of centrosome abnormalities by elevating levels of the centrosome protein pericentrin in prostate epithelial cell lines reproduces many of the phenotypic characteristics of high-grade prostate carcinoma. Cells that transiently or permanently express pericentrin exhibit severe centrosome and spindle defects, cellular disorganization, genomic instability, and enhanced growth in soft agar. On the basis of these observations, we propose a model in which centrosome dysfunction contributes to the progressive loss of cellular and glandular architecture and increasing genomic instability that accompany prostate cancer progression, dissemination, and lethality.


    INTRODUCTION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Prostate carcinoma is the most common gender-specific cancer in the United States, accounting for nearly one-third of all cancers affecting men (1) . The lifetime risk of developing invasive prostate carcinoma in the United States is ~20% (2, 3, 4, 5) , whereas that of octogenarians based on histopathological examination of the prostate at autopsy approaches 80% (6) . Despite the high incidence of prostate carcinoma, the lifetime risk of dying from the disease is much lower, currently estimated to be ~3.6% (1 of 28; Surveillance Epidemiology & End Results, NCI, 2000, personal communication). These epidemiological trends, which may intensify in the coming decades because of the aging of the Baby Boom generation and our increasing ability to recognize tumors at earlier stages, mean that 180,000 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in the coming year in the United States.

Radical prostatectomy is the most common therapy for the small group of patients with high-grade tumors. However, there currently are no sound medical facts to direct treatment of the majority of patients that present with lower grade tumors (7 , 8) . Because a subgroup of patients with low-grade carcinoma ultimately develop aggressive, often lethal cancers, current therapeutic recommendations are to treat all patients with an intent to cure (7 , 8) . Thus, the most pressing need in the management of prostate carcinoma is to develop a noninvasive test to distinguish clinically indolent (low-grade) carcinoma from potentially fatal disease (see "Discussion"; Ref. 9 ). This test would spare the majority of patients with indolent prostate cancer from unnecessary prostatectomy. Reducing such surgeries would result in significant cost savings in health care, decreased therapy-related morbidity, and more focused therapy on the more homogeneous group of patients with aggressive disease, where the efficacy of newer therapies could be assessed more quickly (9) .

One of the best predictors of prostate cancer progression is the Gleason score, a numerical measure compiled from the two most prevalent histological Gleason grades. The Gleason grade reflects cytoarchitectural features that become increasingly aberrant with tumor progression (10 , 11) . Recent results indicate that the parameter with the greatest predictive power is the proportion of tumor with the highest Gleason grades (4 and 5; Ref. 12 ). An intimate relationship between Gleason grade, aneuploidy, and unfavorable clinical outcome has long been known (13, 14, 15, 16, 17) . This suggests that the molecular components and subcellular structures that control cell and tissue architecture and genetic fidelity are likely to contribute to tumor progression. These parameters have the potential to dictate the clinical behavior of tumors and thus serve as predictors of aggressive cancer.

In a search for cellular elements that contribute to the constellation of cellular and genetic features found in high Gleason grade prostate carcinoma, we focused on centrosomes (18) . Centrosomes are tiny cellular organelles that nucleate microtubule growth and organize the mitotic spindle for segregating chromosomes into daughter cells (reviewed in Refs. 19 and 20 ). As organizers of microtubules, centrosomes also play an important role in many microtubule-mediated processes, such as establishing cell shape and cell polarity, processes essential for epithelial gland organization (21, 22, 23, 24) . Centrosomes also coordinate numerous intracellular activities in part by providing docking sites for regulatory molecules, including those that control cell cycle progression, centrosome and spindle function, and cell cycle checkpoints (20 , 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29) . Because high Gleason grade prostate cancer is characterized by defects in the same set of cellular processes controlled by centrosomes, we hypothesized that centrosome dysfunction may be the biological basis for these phenotypic abnormalities.

In this report, we show that centrosome defects are found in essentially all high-grade prostate cancers. Moreover, centrosome defects are present in low-grade tumors, and they increase with increasing Gleason grade and with increasing genomic instability. Artificial induction of centrosome abnormalities in cultured prostate cells by overexpression of the centrosome protein pericentrin reproduces many features of aggressive prostate cancer. We discuss our results in terms of a centrosome-mediated mechanism for tumor progression. Centrosome abnormalities in prostate cancer could be exploited to develop markers for tumor virulence and selective therapies that target tumor-specific centrosome abnormalities, thus circumventing the greatest limitation of current chemotherapy—its lack of tumor selectivity.


    MATERIALS AND METHODS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Immunohistochemical Detection of Centrosomes in Archival Tissue Sections of Prostate Carcinoma.
Archived cases of invasive prostate carcinoma treated by radical prostatectomy were selected from the files of the Department of Pathology of the University of Massachusetts Medical Center accrued between the months of July 1995 and June of 1997. Criteria for inclusion were availability of archival tissue blocks from which good quality histology sections could be prepared. Sections with the highest Gleason grade from each radical prostatectomy were selected because there is good indication that the highest Gleason grade is the best indicator of clinical outcome (12) . We analyzed only high quality tissue sections (109 total) from radical prostatectomies with invasive carcinoma representing Gleason grades 2–5 and from metastatic prostate carcinoma (31 cases). Immunostaining for pericentrin was judged satisfactory when the characteristic single or paired centrosome pattern (30) was detected in nonneoplastic cells adjacent to the tumor (Table 1)Citation .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

 
Table 1 Centrosome abnormalities in prostate carcinoma

 
Immunohistochemistry for pericentrin (18) was performed on serial paraffin sections (5 µm thick) attached to positively charged glass slides (Ventana Medical Systems). The first section of each series was stained with H&E to confirm the presence and grade of the carcinoma and to map the tumor within the section. Parallel sections were processed for centrosome staining by immunohistochemistry. Sections were first heated in a microwave pressure cooker for 30 min in a solution containing 0.2 mM EDTA (18) to render centrosome antigens immunoreactive to pericentrin antibodies (30, 31, 32) . Antibody was diluted 1:1000 in TBST [50 mM Tris (pH 6.5), 150 mM NaCl, and 0.5% Tween 20], added to sections at room temperature, and incubated for 1 h. Biotinylated secondary antibody (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) was applied in TBST for 1 h and amplified by the avidin-biotin-complex method as described (ABC; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). To block endogenous biotin- and avidin-binding sites, sections were treated with a solution of biotin, followed by a solution of avidin before application of the primary antibody. To avoid nonspecific binding by primary and secondary antibodies, washing solutions contained 5% w/v BSA and 5% v/v goat serum. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by preincubation in a solution of 3% H2O2. After immunostaining, sections were lightly counterstained in hematoxylin.

Criteria for Centrosome Defects.
We considered centrosomes abnormal if they had a diameter at least twice that of centrosomes in normal prostate gland epithelium, if they were present in numbers >2, and if they were structurally abnormal, as described previously (18) . In some cases, we analyzed levels of the centrosome protein pericentrin at centrosomes and in the cytoplasm by quantifying the opacity/translucence of immunoperoxidase staining. Briefly, bright-field immunoperoxidase images of tumor and normal prostate glands taken at x1000 were digitally color-inverted so the immunoperoxidase product was a bright signal whose luminosity was proportional to the intensity of the original brown signal. Signals were measured as the integral of a 5-µm area about five times the size of a centrosome, as delineated with the marquee function of Photoshop. Signal emanating from the neighboring cytoplasm was subtracted from the respective centrosome measurement. For cytoplasmic pericentrin measurements, background signals emanating from nontissue sources were subtracted. Inclusion of internal controls (normal glands present within the same section) allowed us to obtain semiquantitatively measurements of pericentrin levels within and between tumors. This approach has been used to establish differences in protein levels of other proteins (33) . Members of our Biostatistics core (Dr. Chung Cheng, University of Massachusetts Medical School) performed statistical analysis.

In Situ Hybridization with Chromosome-specific Centromere Probes.
For in situ hybridization studies, tissue sections parallel to those stained for centrosomes were deparaffinized and heated in a microwave pressure cooker for 20 min in a solution containing 0.01 M sodium citrate (pH 6.0). After cooling to room temperature, sections were treated with a solution of pepsin (40 µg/ml) in 0.1 N HCl for 10 min. Pepsin digestion was stopped by washing the sections several times in 2x SSC at room temperature, and slides were dehydrated in a series of alcohols and air-dried. Biotinylated probes to the centromeric regions of chromosomes 1 or 8 were added in hybridization buffer, and slides were mounted, sealing coverslips with rubber cement. Target DNA and probes were codenatured in a Hybrite oven (Vysis, Downers Grove, IL; Ref. 18 ), and slides were washed several times in SSC buffers for maximum stringency (Vysis), processed to detect signals (NEN Life Science Products, Boston, MA), and lightly counterstained with hematoxylin to reveal nuclei. Data are shown for chromosome 8 (Figs. 5Citation and 7Citation ) and is similar to that observed with probes to chromosome 1 (not shown).



View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 5. Chromosome instability increases with increasing Gleason grade in invasive prostate carcinoma. In situ hybridization with a chromosome 8-specific centromeric probe in a normal gland (A) and Gleason grade 4 prostate carcinoma (B). Inset in A, a low-power (x40) view of an H&E-stained parallel section showing a normal gland (A) and high-grade prostate carcinoma (B). The figure shows that significant numbers of tumor cells have greater than three signals/nuclei (B, arrowheads), whereas no cell shows more than two signals in the normal epithelium (A). The extent of CIN (as the fraction of cells with chromosome 8 copy number >2) is greater in tumors of combined Gleason grades 4 and 5 than those of Gleason grades 2 and 3 (C) and correlates with the cumulative extent of centrosome abnormalities (D, correlation coefficient, r = 0.445). Bars, SE.

 


View larger version (108K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 7. Permanent prostate tumor cell lines expressing pericentrin have tumor-like features. A, Western blot after immunoprecipitation of HA-pericentrin from cell lysates. Centrosome defects were detected and quantified as described in Fig. 6BCitation . In situ hybridization with centromere probes to chromosome 8 to evaluate chromosome instability (C and D) or with propidium iodide to determine DNA content by flow cytometry (E and F) is shown. Y axis, propidium iodide fluorescence. Changes in cellular architecture are observed in HA-pericentrin cells (H) compared with controls (G, note larger cells with larger nuclei). HA-pericentrin-expressing cells exhibit enhanced growth in agarose (J) compared with controls (I), as shown by a significant increase in colony size (K, Peri+) but not number (L, Peri+).

 
A total of 100–120 nuclei in tumor and nontumor areas of the section (identified by hematoxylin counterstain) were scored for centromere signals. CIN3 was determined by computing the fraction of cells with signals greater than the mode (34) , a parameter known to underestimate the true CIN level (18 , 34) . To avoid the compounding effect of nuclear truncation artifact in tissue sections, we computed only chromosome gains. Cells in the G2 phase of the cell cycle, which normally have four copies of each chromosome, were distinguishable from cells with supernumerary chromosomes because sister chromosomes (and centromere signals) in these cells occur in pairs.

Pericentrin Transfections into Normal or Tumor-derived Prostate Cell Lines.
Full length HA-tagged pericentrin in pcDNA I (2 µg; Ref. 32 ; Invitrogen) was used for transient transfection (Lipofectamine; Life Technologies, Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) of the 1542-NPTX cell line derived from normal prostate epithelium by transformation with E6 and E7 from human papillomavirus type 16 (35) . Cells transfected with vector alone served as controls. Permanent pericentrin-expressing PC-3 cells were constructed by cloning full-length HA-pericentrin into the pRetroON vector (Clontech), which codes for a reverse tetracycline transactivator protein and contains tetracycline transactivator responsive elements that drive transcription of the gene of interest. The transactivator is reported to bind and activate the promoter in the presence of tetracycline/doxycycline. After sequence confirmation, the cDNA was introduced into PC-3 cells (American Type Culture Collection) by transient transfection (as above), and 24 permanent lines were obtained after antibiotic selection (Clontech); cell lines expressing vector alone served as controls. We found that HA-pericentrin in these lines was expressed in the absence of doxycycline and did not significantly increase in the presence of doxycycline. The pericentrin-expressing cells exhibited dramatically different features than control cells in the absence of the drug; these features did not noticeably increase in the presence of drug, and they were indistinguishable from features observed in transiently transfected 1542 NPTX cells (Fig. 6)Citation and COS cells (32) . Protein expression in the absence of induction from the pRetroON vector and the lack of inducibility of the vector has been noted by Clontech,4 and they have discontinued its sale. Imperfections in the inducibility of the vector did not impact on our study because we obtained several permanent pericentrin-expressing cell lines. In this study, we present data from cells treated with doxycycline for 48 h.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 6. Transient expression of pericentrin in "normal" near-diploid prostate cells induces centrosome defects, nuclear abnormalities, and aneuploidy. 1542-NPTX cells were transfected with the HA-pericentrin construct or vector alone and grown for an additional 40 hours. A, Western blot after immunoprecipitation of HA-pericentrin from cell lysates. Microspectrofluorometric quantification of DNA stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole shows that most HA-pericentrin-expressing cells (C) had higher or lower nuclear DNA content than control cells (B). The average nuclear DNA content of individual cells (D) was three times greater than that of control cells (D, >100 cells/column). Bars, SE. Centrosome defects detected in cells stained for {gamma}-tubulin were >20-fold higher in HA-pericentrin-expressing cells (E).

 
Immunofluorescence Analysis of Cell Lines.
Pericentrin-expressing 1542 NPTX cells (48 h after transfection) and PC-3 cells were fixed in cold methanol and costained for {gamma}-tubulin to label centrosomes and HA to locate transfected cells (1542 NPTX) as described (32) . DNA was stained with 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and levels were quantified as described (32) .

Growth in Agarose of Prostate Cell Lines Permanently Expressing Pericentrin.
To study the in vitro behavior of cells with deregulated expression of pericentrin, we used the agarose colony assay of Bishop with minor modifications (36) . One hundred thousand HA-pericentrin-expressing cells or empty vector cells were plated in duplicate in six-well plates in 0.35% low-melting point agarose over a cushion of 0.7% agarose. Cells were fed full growth medium (10% FCS, 90% RPMI, plus antibiotics and glutamine) and assessed for growth at 3 and 7 days using an inverted microscope equipped with a film camera. Images were then taken at x40, and colonies were counted and sized after an additional x10 projection onto a screen. A total of 10 images/cell line were analyzed (between 500 and 1000 colonies).


    RESULTS
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Centrosome Abnormalities in Prostate Carcinoma.
In this study, we analyzed prostate tumors of different cytological grades for the presence of centrosome defects. We selected the area with the highest Gleason grade within each radical prostatectomy, because this parameter appears to be the single most important determinant of clinical outcome (12) . We avoided the breakdown of data by Gleason score, as customarily done in clinical data representations, because it represents a compound measure of multiple Gleason grades and may thus obscure the significance of our observations. We examined paraffin sections from radical prostatectomies containing tumors ranging from Gleason grades 2 to 5 (n = 103). Gleason grade 1 tumors were not included, because they are rare and relatively difficult to recognize, and because they may have a different ontogenic derivation than more common carcinomas (37) . We also analyzed a group of metastatic prostate carcinomas comprised primarily of lymph node and bone marrow metastases (n = 31).

Three parameters were initially used to monitor centrosome abnormalities: larger diameter, elevated number, and abnormal structure (Figs. 1Citation and 2Citation ). These parameters were used previously by our group to provide the first evidence for centrosome abnormalities in malignant tumors of multiple tissue origin (18) . Analysis of metastatic carcinomas using these criteria demonstrated that all had abnormal centrosomes (31 of 31; Table 1Citation ). The proportion of tumor with centrosome defects varied from 15% to virtually 100% of tumor cells. These results confirm our previous results showing that centrosomes are abnormal in prostate tumors (18) and extend these observations to demonstrate that centrosome abnormalities in metastatic tumors appear to be universally present and severe. The majority of carcinomas confined to the prostate (Gleason grades 2–5) also had abnormal centrosomes (101 of 109, Table 1Citation ; Fig. 1Citation ). However, abnormalities in this heterogeneous group of tumors were more variable than those observed in metastatic carcinomas. Some exhibited defects in only one or two of the three parameters, and the proportions of tumor tissue with centrosome abnormalities were generally lower than in metastatic tumors. In no instance did we observe centrosome abnormalities in nontumor tissues adjacent to tumors (Table 1Citation ; Fig. 1Citation ).



View larger version (144K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 1. Centrosome abnormalities in invasive prostate carcinoma compared with adjacent normal tissue. Sections from radical prostatectomies were stained for pericentrin (brown) as described in "Materials and Methods." A, prominent centrosome abnormalities are seen in small tumor glands (between arrowheads) compared with centrosomes in three large normal glands (top left, top, and bottom right). x100. B–G: higher magnification (x1000) of centrosomes in tumor cells (C–G) and nontumor cells (B). Centrosomes in tumor cells (arrowheads) are larger in diameter (C, G, arrowheads), elongated (E, arrowheads), multiple and apparently fragmented (D and F), and contain more pericentrin (C–G) than control centrosomes (arrowheads in B). Most tumors had combinations of centrosome defects.

 


View larger version (52K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 2. Centrosome diameter and number are increased, and pericentrin levels are elevated in prostate carcinoma. Measurements from a single grade 3 prostate carcinoma are shown. A–D, densitometric measurements of centrosomes and cytoplasm were performed on tumor tissues and nontumor tissues as described in "Materials and Methods" (33) . Immunoperoxidase reaction product was quantified by measuring translucence in boxes shown in A and B. Insets in A and B, higher magnification of centrosomes in measuring boxes to show dramatic differences in centrosome size. A: left box, cytoplasmic pericentrin; right box, centrosomal pericentrin. B: left box, centrosomal pericentrin; right box, cytoplasmic pericentrin. C and D, an average of eight measurements of centrosomal and cytoplasmic pericentrin in nontumor (Normal) and tumor tissues, respectively. Centrosome size (E) and number (F, normalized to nuclei) were determined as described in "Materials and Methods." Each column in E and F represents the average of >100 measurements taken from one tumor. Ps in C–F were obtained by paired Student’s t test. Bars, SE.

 
We reasoned that variability in centrosome defects in this heterogeneous mix of tumors might reflect differences in biological behavior and Gleason grade. To test this, we analyzed six cases each of tumors with Gleason grades 2 through 5 for the three parameters of centrosome defects. In addition, we examined in detail the distribution and levels of pericentrin, a highly conserved integral centrosome protein involved in centrosome and spindle organization and chromosome segregation (30, 31, 32) . Because our previous work had strongly suggested that levels of the centrosome protein pericentrin were higher in tumor versus nontumor tissues (18) , we analyzed pericentrin levels using a quantitative method established for tissues processed for immunohistochemistry (Ref. 33 ; Fig. 2, C and DCitation ). Of the five parameters measured, four were significantly higher in tumors of high Gleason grades (combined 4 and 5) compared with those of low Gleason grades (combined 2 and 3; Figs. 3Citation and 4Citation ). Centrosome size and number were 2-fold higher in tumors of high Gleason grade (Fig. 4, A and B)Citation , and pericentrin levels at the centrosome and in the cytoplasm were significantly higher in high-grade tumors (Fig. 4, C and D)Citation . In contrast, neither the severity nor prevalence of structural abnormalities in centrosomes increased with higher Gleason grade (data not shown). Among the structural defects were elongated centrosomes (length:width ratio >5; Figs. 1ECitation and 3ICitation ) that were never observed in normal human prostate cells. This suggested that elongated centrosomes were tumor specific and had potential to serve as a diagnostic marker (see "Discussion"). For all five categories of centrosome defects, the distribution within tumors was somewhat heterogeneous, a pattern reminiscent of that reported for tumor DNA content (38, 39, 40, 41) .



View larger version (121K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 3. Centrosome abnormalities increase with increasing Gleason grade: pictorial view. Histological features of a normal prostate gland (A) and prostate carcinoma of Gleason grades 3 (D) and 5 (G) on H&E-stained sections are shown. Areas similar to those imaged in the left column were stained for pericentrin at x400 (B, E, and H) and x1000 (C, F, and I). With advancing Gleason grade, centrosomes become progressively larger, structurally more abnormal, and greater in number.

 


View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 4. Centrosome abnormalities and pericentrin levels increase with increasing Gleason grade: quantitative analysis. Centrosome diameter (A), centrosome number (centrosome:nuclei ratio, B), centrosomal pericentrin (C), and cytoplasmic pericentrin (D) were determined as described in "Materials and Methods." The first column in A–D represents the mean of measurements made on six tumors of grade 2 and six of grade 3 combined; the second column, similar numbers of grades 4 and 5. All values, a percentage increase above nontumor cells present within the tissue sections (Y axis). The data demonstrate that abnormal centrosome features are statistically greater in tumors of higher Gleason grade. Ps obtained by paired Student’s t test. Bars, SE.

 
Relationship between Centrosome Abnormalities and Chromosomal Instability.
Because centrosomes play a role in the maintenance of genomic stability through control of mitotic chromosome segregation, we asked if there was a correlation between abnormal centrosomes and genomic instability, specifically CIN. CIN, as first described by Lengauer et al. (34) , is a measure of the nonmodal distribution of chromosomes that is thought to result from persistent missegregation of chromosomes during mitosis. In this study, we examined the nonmodal distribution of chromosome 8 in prostate tumors of different Gleason grades using centromere-specific nucleotide probes and in situ hybridization (see "Materials and Methods" and Fig. 5Citation ). As expected, the extent of CIN in tumor tissues was significantly greater than in nontumor tissues (Fig. 5)Citation . Interestingly, the extent of CIN was significantly greater in Gleason grade 4/5 than in Gleason grade 2/3 (Fig. 5C)Citation . Finally, the extent of CIN correlated with the extent of centrosome abnormalities in parallel sections from the same set of tumors (Fig. 5D)Citation , suggesting a relationship between centrosome defects and genomic instability in prostate tumor progression.

Induction of Centrosome Defects in Prostate Cells by Ectopic Expression of the Centrosome Protein Pericentrin Induces a Prostate Tumor-like Phenotype.
If elevated pericentrin levels and centrosome defects observed in prostate tumor tissues contribute to cellular and genetic changes that occur during tumor progression, they may have the potential to induce similar changes when experimentally induced in cultured cells. To directly test this idea, we induced centrosome defects in prostate cells in vitro. We expressed a HA-tagged pericentrin protein in cell lines derived from normal prostate epithelium (1542-NPTX; Ref. 35 ) and from metastatic prostate cancer (PC-3) both by transient transfection and by construction of permanent cell lines (Figs. 6Citation and 7Citation ).

Elevation of pericentrin levels induced or exacerbated genetic instability and cellular changes in 1542-NPTX and PC-3 cells, respectively. 1542-NPTX cells transiently transfected with the HA-pericentrin construct exhibited numerous defects in centrosome size, shape, and number (Fig. 6E)Citation as revealed by immunofluorescence staining for the centrosome protein {gamma}-tubulin (42) . Defective centrosomes were usually associated with structurally disorganized mitotic spindles, and chromosomes associated with these abnormal spindles were often misaligned and missegregated, indicating that the cells were undergoing aberrant mitoses (data not shown). Consistent with this idea were dramatic changes in nuclear morphology observed in interphase cells (lobate and misshapen nuclei, micronuclei, and multiple nuclei). Moreover, DNA levels were elevated in a large proportion of HA-pericentrin cells but not in control cells, demonstrating that pericentrin expression induced aneuploidy/polyploidy (Fig. 6, B–D)Citation . Control cells included cells transfected with vector alone (Fig. 6)Citation , a truncated pericentrin construct (43) and ß-galactosidase (data not shown). Similar results were observed in green fluorescent protein-pericentrin transfected cells (data not shown), indicating that this phenotype was attributable to pericentrin overexpression and unrelated to the expression tag. These studies demonstrate that tumor-like changes in cellular architecture and genetic composition can take place within one to three cell cycles after HA-pericentrin expression.

To examine the long-term effects of HA-pericentrin expression, we constructed permanent prostate tumor-derived cell lines (PC-3; see "Materials and Methods"). The pericentrin-expressing PC-3 cell lines (total, 24) exhibited several abnormal features compared with control PC-3 cells containing empty vector (Fig. 7)Citation . Six cell lines were examined in detail, and all gave a similar phenotype; below we present data from one line (PeriPC-3–4.1). The presence of the HA-pericentrin construct was confirmed by PCR analysis (data not shown), and the HA-tagged pericentrin protein was detected by Western blot (Fig. 7A)Citation . Defects in centrosomes, spindles, and nuclei were significantly higher than in control cells and were strikingly similar to defects observed in transiently transfected 1542-NPTX cells (Fig. 6)Citation and in prostate tumors (Figs. 1Citation and 2Citation ). DNA content analyzed by flow cytometry (Fig. 7, E and F)Citation and chromosomal instability assayed by in situ hybridization with centromere probes for chromosome 8 (Fig. 7, C and D)Citation were significantly higher in pericentrin-expressing PC-3 cells. Moreover, the cellular architecture of pericentrin-PC-3 cells was dramatically altered (Fig. 7, G and H)Citation , and the cells grew more rapidly in soft agar compared with controls (Fig. 7, I–K)Citation . Taken together, these data demonstrate that expression of a single centrosome protein in normal and prostate tumor cells can induce or exacerbate abnormalities in centrosome number and structure, cellular architecture, nuclear morphology, cell growth, and genomic stability, features that are characteristically altered in aggressive prostate tumors.


    DISCUSSION
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The results presented here demonstrate that centrosomes are structurally and numerically abnormal in the vast majority of metastatic and invasive prostate carcinomas. These abnormalities are frequent and usually occur together in the same tumor. The extent of centrosome abnormalities in invasive prostate carcinoma correlates with the Gleason grade in that tumors with the highest Gleason grade have more extensive centrosome abnormalities. The extent of chromosome instability correlates with the extent of centrosome abnormalities, both increasing with increasing Gleason grade. These observations are consistent with the idea that centrosome defects contribute to genomic instability during prostate cancer progression. Support for this idea comes from data showing that artificial induction of centrosome defects by pericentrin overexpression can induce genetic instability, loss of cellular architecture, and rapid cell growth in prostate cells.

The in vivo and in vitro data presented in this report implicate centrosomes in the progression of prostate cancer. In our current model (Fig. 8)Citation , centrosome dysfunction causes modification of the microtubule cytoskeleton and contributes directly to cellular and glandular disorganization and genomic instability, creating cells that are predisposed to additional changes that lead to aggressive tumor development. We do not know whether centrosome abnormalities develop in a progressive manner (Fig. 8Citation , solid arrow) or in a discontinuous fashion (Fig. 8Citation , segmented arrows). Elucidation of the mechanisms by which centrosome changes occur may provide insights into the evolutionary pathway of the cytoarchitectural features that occur during prostate cancer progression (44 , 45) .



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
[Download PPT slide]
 
Fig. 8. Centrosome-based model for prostate cancer progression. Diagram of normal (above) and neoplastic prostate glands (below) showing the most salient cytoarchitectural features of tumors with increasing Gleason grade. In our model, centrosomes (*) become increasingly abnormal and misallocated during tumor progression, concurrent with abnormalities in nuclei and nucleoli (filled dot), cellular and glandular disorganization, and chromosome instability. Filled arrows, currently favored evolutionary pathways; segmented arrows, possible alternative pathways. Neither pathway has been convincingly demonstrated for prostate carcinoma. Gleason grade I and prostatic intraepithelial neoplasm lesions are not represented.

 
Our observations of CIN in prostate carcinoma are consistent with those made previously by Lengauer et al. (34) in colon carcinoma cells, and they suggest that CIN may be the most important cause of aneuploidy in colon and prostate tumors. Because centrosome abnormalities are found in essentially all carcinomas examined to date (18) , they may be a major cause of aneuploidy/CIN in solid tumors (18 , 46) . Consistent with this idea are data implicating centrosome dysfunction in CIN and aneuploidy in colon carcinoma cell lines (47) .

Our work has important implications for prostate cancer progression, prognosis, and treatment. Our observations suggest that progressive dysfunction of centrosomes occurs in prostate carcinoma, and that this can have far-reaching effects on cell morphology and genetic composition. Elucidating the mechanism(s) that leads to centrosome dysfunction in prostate carcinoma and the fundamental differences between centrosomes of low- and high-grade tumors could lead to the development of markers for tumor virulence. Such markers could play a critical role in identifying the subset of patients destined to develop aggressive, lethal prostate carcinoma. For example, elevated levels of centrosome proteins could provide a potential marker for early prostate lesions. If released into the circulation like prostate-specific antigen, these proteins could provide a noninvasive method to detect early lesions that lead to aggressive disease. Centrosome abnormalities also constitute an attractive, novel therapeutic target because they are tumor specific. It may be possible to develop chemical inhibitors against molecular components of centrosomes, such as pericentrin, that could correct or reverse centrosome defects, genetic instability, and tumor progression.


    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
We thank Dr. G. Stein and G. Sluder (Department of Cell Biology) for critical reading of the manuscript and Dr. C. Hsieh (Biostatistics Core Facility, University of Massachusetts Cancer Center) for assistance with statistical analysis.


    FOOTNOTES
 
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

1 Supported by Grants PC970425 and PC000018 (to G. A. P. and S. J. D.) from the Department of Defense, Grant RO1 GM51994 (to S. J. D.) from the NIH, and funds from the Massachusetts Department of Public Health and Our Danny Cancer Fund (to G. A. P. and S. J. D.). S. J. D. is a recipient of an Established Investigator Award 96-276 from the American Heart Association. Back

2 To whom requests for reprints should be addressed, at Department of Pathology, Room S2–141, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655. Phone: (508) 856-4124; Fax: (508) 856-5780; E-mail: German.pihan{at}umassmed.edu, or Department of Molecular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 373 Plantation Street, Worcester, MA 01605. Phone: (508) 856-1613; Fax: (508) 856-4289; E-mail: stephen.doxey{at}umassmed.edu Back

3 The abbreviations used are: CIN, chromosomal numerical instability; HA, hemagglutinin antigen. Back

4 Personal communication. Back

Received 8/25/00. Accepted 12/29/00.


    REFERENCES
 Top
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 

  1. Greenlee R. T., Murray T., Bolden S., Wingo P. A. Cancer statistics, 2000. CA Cancer J. Clin., 50: 7-33, 2000.[Abstract]
  2. Merrill R. M., Weed D. L., Feuer E. J. The lifetime risk of developing prostate cancer in white and black men. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev., 6: 763-768, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Miller B., Ries L., Hankey B. Cancer Statistics Review: 1973–1989, NIH publication 92-2789 Department of Health and Human Services Bethesda, MD 1992.
  4. Seidman H., Mushinski M. H., Gelb S. K., Silverberg E. Probabilities of eventually developing or dying of cancer–United States, 1985. CA Cancer J. Clin., 35: 36-56, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Silverberg E. Statistical and epidemiologic data on urologic cancer. Cancer (Phila.), 60: 692-717, 1987.[Medline]
  6. Bostwick D. G., Cooner W. H., Denis L., Jones G. W., Scardino P. T., Murphy G. P. The association of benign prostatic hyperplasia and cancer of the prostate. Cancer (Phila.), 70: 291-301, 1992.[Medline]
  7. Fowler F. J., Jr., McNaughton Collins M., Albertsen P. C., Zietman A., Elliott D. B., Barry M. J. Comparison of recommendations by urologists and radiation oncologists for treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 283: 3217-3222, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Wilt T. J. Uncertainty in prostate cancer care: the physician’s role in clearing the confusion. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 283: 3258-3260, 2000.[Free Full Text]
  9. von Eschenbach A. The challenge of prostate cancer. CA Cancer J. Clin., 49: 262-263, 2000.[Medline]
  10. Gleason D. F. Classification of prostatic carcinomas. Cancer Chemother. Rep., 50: 125-128, 1966.[Medline]
  11. Gleason D. F., Mellinger G. T. Prediction of prognosis for prostatic adenocarcinoma by combined histological grading and clinical staging. J. Urol., 111: 58-64, 1974.[Medline]
  12. Stamey T. A., McNeal J. E., Yemoto C. M., Sigal B. M., Johnstone I. M. Biological determinants of cancer progression in men with prostate cancer. J. Am. Med. Assoc., 281: 1395-1400, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Dejter S. W., Jr., Cunningham R. E., Noguchi P. D., Jones R. V., Moul J. W., McLeod D. G., Lynch J. H. Prognostic significance of DNA ploidy in carcinoma of prostate. Urology, 33: 361-366, 1989.[Medline]
  14. Frankfurt O. S., Chin J. L., Englander L. S., Greco W. R., Pontes J. E., Rustum Y. M. Relationship between DNA ploidy, glandular differentiation, and tumor spread in human prostate cancer. Cancer Res., 45: 1418-1423, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Greene D. R., Taylor S. R., Wheeler T. M., Scardino P. T. DNA ploidy by image analysis of individual foci of prostate cancer: a preliminary report. Cancer Res., 51: 4084-4089, 1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Hussain M. H., Powell I., Zaki N., Maciorowski Z., Sakr W., KuKuruga M., Visscher D., Haas G. P., Pontes J. E., Ensley J. F. Flow cytometric DNA analysis of fresh prostatic resections. Cancer (Phila.), 72: 3012-3019, 1993.[Medline]
  17. Scrivner D. L., Meyer J. S., Rujanavech N., Fathman A., Scully T. Cell kinetics by bromodeoxyuridine labeling and deoxyribonucleic acid ploidy in prostatic carcinoma needle biopsies. J. Urol., 146: 1034-1039, 1991.[Medline]
  18. Pihan G. A., Purohit A., Wallace J., Knecht H., Woda B., Quesenberry P., Doxsey S. J. Centrosome defects and genetic instability in malignant tumors. Cancer Res., 58: 3974-3985, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Kellogg D. R., Moritz M., Alberts B. M. The centrosome and cellular organization. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 63: 639-674, 1994.[Medline]
  20. Zimmerman W., Sparks C. A., Doxsey S. J. Amorphous no longer: the centrosome comes into focus. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 11: 122-128, 1999.[Medline]
  21. Bornens M. Cell polarity: intrinsic or externally imposed?. New Biol., 3: 627-636, 1991.[Medline]
  22. Meads T., Schroer T. A. Polarity and nucleation of microtubules in polarized epithelial cells. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 32: 273-288, 1995.[Medline]
  23. Rizzolo L. J., Joshi H. C. Apical orientation of the microtubule organizing center and associated {gamma}-tubulin during the polarization of the retinal pigment epithelium in vivo. Dev. Biol., 157: 147-156, 1993.[Medline]
  24. Whitehead C. M., Salisbury J. L. Regulation and regulatory activities of centrosomes. J. Cell. Biochem., 32–33 (Suppl.): 192-199, 1999.
  25. Brown C. R., Hong-Brown L. Q., Doxsey S. J., Welch W. J. Molecular chaperones and the centrosome. J. Biol. Chem., 271: 833-840, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Pines J. Four-dimensional control of the cell cycle. Nat. Cell Biol., 1: E73-E79, 1999.[Medline]
  27. Pockwinse S. M., Krockmalnic G., Doxsey S. J., Nickerson J., Lian J. B., van Wijnen A. J., Stein J. L., Stein G. S., Penman S. Cell cycle independent interaction of CDC2 with the centrosome, which is associated with the nuclear matrix-intermediate filament scaffold. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94: 3022-3027, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  28. Raff J. W. The missing (L) UNC?. Curr. Biol., 9: R708-R710, 1999.[Medline]
  29. Sluder G., Hinchcliffe E. H. Control of centrosome reproduction: the right number at the right time. Biol. Cell, 91: 413-427, 1999.[Medline]
  30. Doxsey S. J., Stein P., Evans L., Calarco P. D., Kirschner M. Pericentrin, a highly conserved centrosome protein involved in microtubule organization. Cell, 76: 639-650, 1994.[Medline]
  31. Dictenberg J. B., Zimmerman W., Sparks C. A., Young A., Vidair C., Zheng Y., Carrington W., Fay F. S., Doxsey S. J. Pericentrin and {gamma}-tubulin form a protein complex and are organized into a novel lattice at the centrosome. J. Cell Biol., 141: 163-174, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Purohit A., Tynan S. H., Vallee R., Doxsey S. J. Direct interaction of pericentrin with cytoplasmic dynein light intermediate chain contributes to mitotic spindle organization. J. Cell Biol., 147: 481-492, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Matkowskyj K. A., Schonfeld D., Benya R. V. Quantitative immunohistochemistry by measuring cumulative signal strength using commercially available software photoshop and matlab. J. Histochem. Cytochem., 48: 303-312, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Lengauer C., Kinzler K. W., Vogelstein B. Genetic instability in colorectal cancers. Nature (Lond.), 386: 623-627, 1997.[Medline]
  35. Bright R. K., Vocke C. D., Emmert-Buck M. R., Duray P. H., Solomon D., Fetsch P., Rhim J. S., Linehan W. M., Topalian S. L. Generation and genetic characterization of immortal human prostate epithelial cell lines derived from primary cancer specimens. Cancer Res., 57: 995-1002, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Ziegler S. F., Levin S. D., Perlmutter R. M. Transformation of NIH 3T3 fibroblasts by an activated form of p59hck. Mol. Cell. Biol., 9: 2724-2727, 1989.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  37. Grignon D. J., Sakr W. A. Zonal origin of prostatic adenocarcinoma: are there biologic differences between transition zone and peripheral zone adenocarcinomas of the prostate gland?. J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl., 19: 267-269, 1994.[Medline]
  38. Irinopoulou T., Vassy J., Beil M., Nicolopoulou P., Encaoua D., Rigaut J. P. Three-dimensional, DNA image cytometry by confocal scanning laser microscopy in thick tissue blocks of prostatic lesions. Cytometry, 27: 99-105, 1997.[Medline]
  39. Irinopoulou T., Vassy J., Rigaut J. P. Application of confocal scanning laser microscopy to 3-D DNA image cytometry of prostatic lesions. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol., 20: 351-357, 1998.[Medline]
  40. Petein M., Michel P., van Velthoven R., Pasteels J. L., Brawer M. K., Davis J. R., Nagle R. B., Kiss R. Morphonuclear relationship between prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and cancers as assessed by digital cell image analysis. Am. J. Clin. Pathol., 96: 628-634, 1991.[Medline]
  41. Warzynski M. J., Soechtig C. E., Maatman T. J., Goldsmith L. C., Grobbel M. A., Carothers G. G., Shockley K. F. DNA heterogeneity determined by flow cytometry in prostatic adenocarcinoma–necessitating multiple site analysis. Prostate, 27: 329-335, 1995.[Medline]
  42. Schiebel E. {gamma}-tubulin complexes: binding to the centrosome, regulation, and microtubule nucleation. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 12: 113-118, 2000.[Medline]
  43. Young A., Dictenberg J., Purohit A., Tuft R., Doxsey S. J. Cytoplasmic dynein-mediated assembly of pericentrin and {gamma}-tubulin onto centrosomes. Mol. Biol. Cell, 11: 2047-2056, 2000.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  44. Epstein J. I., Carmichael M. J., Partin A. W., Walsh P. C. Small high grade adenocarcinoma of the prostate in radical prostatectomy specimens performed for nonpalpable disease: pathogenetic and clinical implications. J. Urol., 151: 1587-1592, 1994.[Medline]
  45. McNeal J. E. Prostatic microcarcinomas in relation to cancer origin and the evolution to clinical cancer. Cancer (Phila.), 71: 984-991, 1993.[Medline]
  46. Pihan G. A., Doxsey S. J. The mitotic machinery as a source of genetic instability in cancer. Semin. Cancer Biol., 9: 289-302, 1999.[Medline]
  47. Ghadimi B. M., Sackett D. L., Difilippantonio M. J., Schrock E., Neumann T., Jauho A., Auer G., Ried T. Centrosome amplification and instability occurs exclusively in aneuploid, but not in diploid colorectal cancer cell lines, and correlates with numerical chromosomal aberrations. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 27: 183-190, 2000.[Medline]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
S. Yang, X. Liu, Y. Yin, M. N. Fukuda, and J. Zhou
Tastin is required for bipolar spindle assembly and centrosome integrity during mitosis
FASEB J, June 1, 2008; 22(6): 1960 - 1972.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
M C. Miller, G. V Doyle, and L. W M M Terstappen
Monitoring and Characterization of CTC in Cancer Patients
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 12, 2008; 2008(1): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
Z. Matijasevic, H. A. Steinman, K. Hoover, and S. N. Jones
MdmX Promotes Bipolar Mitosis To Suppress Transformation and Tumorigenesis in p53-Deficient Cells and Mice
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2008; 28(4): 1265 - 1273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. J. Chng, E. Braggio, G. Mulligan, B. Bryant, E. Remstein, R. Valdez, A. Dogan, and R. Fonseca
The centrosome index is a powerful prognostic marker in myeloma and identifies a cohort of patients that might benefit from aurora kinase inhibition
Blood, February 1, 2008; 111(3): 1603 - 1609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
C. Kasbek, C.-H. Yang, A. M. Yusof, H. M. Chapman, M. Winey, and H. A. Fisk
Preventing the Degradation of Mps1 at Centrosomes Is Sufficient to Cause Centrosome Reduplication in Human Cells
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2007; 18(11): 4457 - 4469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
C. I. van de Wetering and C. M. Knudson
Chromosomal Instability and Supernumerary Centrosomes Represent Precursor Defects in a Mouse Model of T-Cell Lymphoma
Cancer Res., September 1, 2007; 67(17): 8081 - 8088.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
B. Rebacz, T. O. Larsen, M. H. Clausen, M. H. Ronnest, H. Loffler, A. D. Ho, and A. Kramer
Identification of Griseofulvin as an Inhibitor of Centrosomal Clustering in a Phenotype-Based Screen
Cancer Res., July 1, 2007; 67(13): 6342 - 6350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Tanaka, Y. Hashimoto, T. Ito, K. Kondo, M. Higashiyama, S. Tsunoda, C. Ortiz, Y. Sakai, J. Inazawa, and Y. Shimada
The Suppression of Aurora-A/STK15/BTAK Expression Enhances Chemosensitivity to Docetaxel in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., February 15, 2007; 13(4): 1331 - 1340.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Shao, Y. Wang, S. Jin, Y. Song, X. Wang, W. Fan, Z. Zhao, M. Fu, T. Tong, L. Dong, et al.
Gadd45a Interacts with Aurora-A and Inhibits Its Kinase Activity
J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28943 - 28950.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
O. Date, M. Katsura, M. Ishida, T. Yoshihara, A. Kinomura, T. Sueda, and K. Miyagawa
Haploinsufficiency of RAD51B Causes Centrosome Fragmentation and Aneuploidy in Human Cells.
Cancer Res., June 15, 2006; 66(12): 6018 - 6024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
M. C Fleisch, C. A Maxwell, and M.-H. Barcellos-Hoff
The pleiotropic roles of transforming growth factor beta in homeostasis and carcinogenesis of endocrine organs.
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2006; 13(2): 379 - 400.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
W. J. Chng, G. J. Ahmann, K. Henderson, R. Santana-Davila, P. R. Greipp, M. A. Gertz, M. Q. Lacy, A. Dispenzieri, S. Kumar, S. V. Rajkumar, et al.
Clinical implication of centrosome amplification in plasma cell neoplasm
Blood, May 1, 2006; 107(9): 3669 - 3675.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. Suizu, A. Ryo, G. Wulf, J. Lim, and K. P. Lu
Pin1 Regulates Centrosome Duplication, and Its Overexpression Induces Centrosome Amplification, Chromosome Instability, and Oncogenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., February 15, 2006; 26(4): 1463 - 1479.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J.-M. Peloponese Jr., K. Haller, A. Miyazato, and K.-T. Jeang
Abnormal centrosome amplification in cells through the targeting of Ran-binding protein-1 by the human T cell leukemia virus type-1 Tax oncoprotein
PNAS, December 27, 2005; 102(52): 18974 - 18979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. S. Golubkov, A. V. Chekanov, S. J. Doxsey, and A. Y. Strongin
Centrosomal Pericentrin Is a Direct Cleavage Target of Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase in Humans but Not in Mice: POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR TUMORIGENESIS
J. Biol. Chem., December 23, 2005; 280(51): 42237 - 42241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
MutagenesisHome page
M. Fenech
The Genome Health Clinic and Genome Health Nutrigenomics concepts: diagnosis and nutritional treatment of genome and epigenome damage on an individual basis
Mutagenesis, July 1, 2005; 20(4): 255 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
V. S. Golubkov, S. Boyd, A. Y. Savinov, A. V. Chekanov, A. L. Osterman, A. Remacle, D. V. Rozanov, S. J. Doxsey, and A. Y. Strongin
Membrane Type-1 Matrix Metalloproteinase (MT1-MMP) Exhibits an Important Intracellular Cleavage Function and Causes Chromosome Instability
J. Biol. Chem., July 1, 2005; 280(26): 25079 - 25086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Hum ReprodHome page
A. Can, O. Semiz, and O. Cinar
Bisphenol-A induces cell cycle delay and alters centrosome and spindle microtubular organization in oocytes during meiosis
Mol. Hum. Reprod., June 1, 2005; 11(6): 389 - 396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
E. Tanaka, Y. Hashimoto, T. Ito, T. Okumura, T. Kan, G. Watanabe, M. Imamura, J. Inazawa, and Y. Shimada
The Clinical Significance of Aurora-A/STK15/BTAK Expression in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2005; 11(5): 1827 - 1834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JDRHome page
S.C. Reshmi and S.M. Gollin
Chromosomal Instability in Oral Cancer Cells
Journal of Dental Research, February 1, 2005; 84(2): 107 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
N. J. Quintyne, J. E. Reing, D. R. Hoffelder, S. M. Gollin, and W. S. Saunders
Spindle Multipolarity Is Prevented by Centrosomal Clustering
Science, January 7, 2005; 307(5706): 127 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
R. Fan, T. S. Kumaravel, F. Jalali, P. Marrano, J. A. Squire, and R. G. Bristow
Defective DNA Strand Break Repair after DNA Damage in Prostate Cancer Cells: Implications for Genetic Instability and Prostate Cancer Progression
Cancer Res., December 1, 2004; 64(23): 8526 - 8533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
P Dey
Aneuploidy and malignancy: an unsolved equation
J. Clin. Pathol., December 1, 2004; 57(12): 1245 - 1249.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Hida, Y. Hida, D. N. Amin, A. F. Flint, D. Panigrahy, C. C. Morton, and M. Klagsbrun
Tumor-Associated Endothelial Cells with Cytogenetic Abnormalities
Cancer Res., November 15, 2004; 64(22): 8249 - 8255.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
D. G. Hayward, R. B. Clarke, A. J. Faragher, M. R. Pillai, I. M. Hagan, and A. M. Fry
The Centrosomal Kinase Nek2 Displays Elevated Levels of Protein Expression in Human Breast Cancer
Cancer Res., October 15, 2004; 64(20): 7370 - 7376.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
M. Martinez-Campos, R. Basto, J. Baker, M. Kernan, and J. W. Raff
The Drosophila pericentrin-like protein is essential for cilia/flagella function, but appears to be dispensable for mitosis
J. Cell Biol., June 7, 2004; 165(5): 673 - 683.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Cell Sci.Home page
M. Delattre and P. Gonczy
The arithmetic of centrosome biogenesis
J. Cell Sci., May 1, 2004; 117(9): 1619 - 1630.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
D. Chen, A. Purohit, E. Halilovic, S. J. Doxsey, and A. C. Newton
Centrosomal Anchoring of Protein Kinase C {beta}II by Pericentrin Controls Microtubule Organization, Spindle Function, and Cytokinesis
J. Biol. Chem., February 6, 2004; 279(6): 4829 - 4839.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
FASEB J.Home page
N. AHMAD
Polo-like kinase (Plk) 1: a novel target for the treatment of prostate cancer
FASEB J, January 1, 2004; 18(1): 5 - 7.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurosci.Home page
A. H. Yang, D. Kaushal, S. K. Rehen, K. Kriedt, M. A. Kingsbury, M. J. McConnell, and J. Chun
Chromosome Segregation Defects Contribute to Aneuploidy in Normal Neural Progenitor Cells
J. Neurosci., November 12, 2003; 23(32): 10454 - 10462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Gromley, A. Jurczyk, J. Sillibourne, E. Halilovic, M. Mogensen, I. Groisman, M. Blomberg, and S. Doxsey
A novel human protein of the maternal centriole is required for the final stages of cytokinesis and entry into S phase
J. Cell Biol., May 12, 2003; 161(3): 535 - 545.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
G. A. Pihan, J. Wallace, Y. Zhou, and S. J. Doxsey
Centrosome Abnormalities and Chromosome Instability Occur Together in Pre-invasive Carcinomas
Cancer Res., March 15, 2003; 63(6): 1398 - 1404.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
D. Li, J. Zhu, P. F. Firozi, J. L. Abbruzzese, D. B. Evans, K. Cleary, H. Friess, and S. Sen
Overexpression of Oncogenic STK15/BTAK/Aurora A Kinase in Human Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., March 1, 2003; 9(3): 991 - 997.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
J. J. Keats, T. Reiman, C. A. Maxwell, B. J. Taylor, L. M. Larratt, M. J. Mant, A. R. Belch, and L. M. Pilarski
In multiple myeloma, t(4;14)(p16;q32) is an adverse prognostic factor irrespective of FGFR3 expression
Blood, February 15, 2003; 101(4): 1520 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BloodHome page
K. Neben, C. Giesecke, S. Schweizer, A. D. Ho, and A. Kramer
Centrosome aberrations in acute myeloid leukemia are correlated with cytogenetic risk profile
Blood, January 1, 2003; 101(1): 289 - 291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
B. Spankuch-Schmitt, J. Bereiter-Hahn, M. Kaufmann, and K. Strebhardt
Effect of RNA Silencing of Polo-Like Kinase-1 (PLK1) on Apoptosis and Spindle Formation in Human Cancer Cells
J Natl Cancer Inst, December 18, 2002; 94(24): 1863 - 1877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. Sen, H. Zhou, R.-D. Zhang, D. S. Yoon, F. Vakar-Lopez, S. Ito, F. Jiang, D. Johnston, H. B. Grossman, A. C. Ruifrok, et al.
Amplification/Overexpression of a Mitotic Kinase Gene in Human Bladder Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, September 4, 2002; 94(17): 1320 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
V. Bergoglio, M.-J. Pillaire, M. Lacroix-Triki, B. Raynaud-Messina, Y. Canitrot, A. Bieth, M. Gares, M. Wright, G. Delsol, L. A. Loeb, et al.
Deregulated DNA Polymerase {beta} Induces Chromosome Instability and Tumorigenesis
Cancer Res., June 1, 2002; 62(12): 3511 - 3514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cell Growth Differ.Home page
M. R. Flory, M. Morphew, J. D. Joseph, A. R. Means, and T. N. Davis
Pcp1p, an Spc110p-related Calmodulin Target at the Centrosome of the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Cell Growth Differ., February 1, 2002; 13(2): 47 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
W. L. Lingle, S. L. Barrett, V. C. Negron, A. B. D'Assoro, K. Boeneman, W. Liu, C. M. Whitehead, C. Reynolds, and J. L. Salisbury
Centrosome amplification drives chromosomal instability in breast tumor development
PNAS, February 19, 2002; 99(4): 1978 - 1983.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pihan, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Doxsey, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pihan, G. A.
Right arrow Articles by Doxsey, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Cancer Research Clinical Cancer Research
Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Molecular Cancer Research Cancer Prevention Research
Cancer Prevention Journals Portal Cancer Reviews Online
Annual Meeting Education Book Meeting Abstracts Online